Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

The International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions, ISSAIs, are issued by the

ISSAI 1520 International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions, INTOSAI. For more information visit
www.issai.org

Practice Note to ISA 520

Analytical Procedures
INTOSAI
INTO S AI Pr o f e s si o n a l S t an d ar ds Co m mitt e e
PSC-Secretariat
Rigsrevisionen • Store Kongensgade 45 • 1264 Copenhagen K • Denmark
Tel.:+45 3392 8400 • Fax:+45 3311 0415 •E-mail: [email protected]

IN TO SA I

E XP ERIE NT IA MUT UA
EX P ERIEN TIA M UTU A
OM NIBU S P RO DE ST
OMNIBUS
PRODEST

INTOSAI General Secretariat - RECHNUNGSHOF


(Austrian Court of Audit)
DAMPFSCHIFFSTRASSE 2
A-1033 VIENNA
AUSTRIA
Tel.: ++43 (1) 711 71 • Fax: ++43 (1) 718 09 69

E-MAIL: [email protected];
WORLD WIDE WEB: http://www.intosai.org

This Practice Note in combination with the International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 520 “Analytical Procedures” issued by the
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) constitute ISSAI 1520.
ISSAI 1520
practice note 520

Practice Note1 to International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 520

Analytical Procedures

Background

This Practice Note provides supplementary guidance on ISA 520 – Analytical Procedures. It is read
together with the ISA. ISA 520 is effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2009. The Practice Note is effective the same date as the ISA.

Introduction to the ISA


ISA 520 deals with the auditor’s use of analytical procedures as substantive procedures (“substantive an-
alytical procedures”). It also deals with auditor’s responsibility to perform analytical procedures near the
end of the audit that assist the auditor when forming an overall conclusion on the financial statements.
ISA 3152 deals with the use of analytical procedures as risk assessment procedures. ISA 3303 includes
requirements and guidance regarding the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures in response to
assessed risks; these audit procedures may include substantive analytical procedures.

Content of the Practice Note


P1. The Practice Note provides additional guidance for public sector auditors related to:
(a) Overall Considerations.
(b) Substantive Analytical Procedures.
(c) Investigating Results of Analytical Procedures.
(d) Nature of Analytical Procedures.

Applicability of the ISA in Public Sector Auditing

P2. ISA 520 is applicable to auditors of public sector entities in their role as auditors of financial
statements.

1 All Practice Notes are considered together with ISSAI 1000, “General Introduction to the Financial Audit Guidelines.”
2 ISA 315, “Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment,” paragraphs P6(b).
3 ISA 330, “The Auditor’s Reponses to Assessed Risks,” paragraphs 6 and 18.


Analytical Procedures
ISSAI 1520
practice notE 520

Additional Guidance on Public Sector Issues


P3. ISA 520 contains application and other explanatory material with considerations specific to
public sector entities in paragraph A11 of the ISA.

Overall Considerations
P4. The objectives of a financial audit in the public sector are often broader than expressing an opin-
ion whether the financial statements have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance
with the applicable financial reporting framework (i.e. the scope of the ISAs). The audit mandate,
or obligations for public sector entities, arising from legislation, regulation, ministerial direc-
tives, government policy requirements, or resolutions of the legislature may result in additional
objectives. These responsibilities may include, for example, performing procedures and reporting
instances of non-compliance with authorities, and the effectiveness of internal controls. However,
even where there are no such additional objectives, there may be general public expectations in
this regard. Public sector auditors may design and perform analytical procedures in light of these
additional responsibilities. However, these procedures on their own may not be effective for
meeting these additional responsibilities.

P5. Analytical procedures related to program expenditure within the public sector are likely to
include comparisons with non-financial data because there is normally less comparable finan-
cial information to perform analytical procedures. Therefore, the evaluation of controls over the
reliability of non-financial data used in the analytical procedures is important within the public
sector.

Substantive Analytical Procedures


P6. When designing and performing substantive analytical procedures, either alone or in combination
with tests of details, as stated in paragraph 5 of the ISA, public sector auditors may consider that
analytical procedures do not normally provide evidence about certain additional objectives, such
as compliance with authorities.

P7. When designing analytical procedures, public sector auditors consider the information obtained
and conclusions reached in related audit activities, including performance and other audits. When
relying on other audit activities, public sector auditors evaluate whether the related objectives,
assertions covered and tests performed are appropriate for the purpose of the financial statement
audit.

P8. Paragraph 5(d) of the ISA requires the auditor to determine the difference of recorded amounts
from expected values that is acceptable without investigation. This determination is influenced by
materiality, which in the public sector is influenced by the audit mandate and public expectations.
ISSAI 13154 and ISSAI 13205 provide further guidance on this matter.

4 ISSAI 1315, “Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment.”
5 ISSAI 1320, “Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit.”


Analytical Procedures
ISSAI 1520
practice note 520

P9. When assessing the reliability of data as referred to in paragraph A12 (a) of the ISA, public sector
auditors may use information obtained from other entities within the government even though
they ultimately report to the same authority. For example, comparative data in the public sector
may include comparisons between similar entities and/or programs.

P10. When considering the guidance in paragraph A13 for performing analytical procedures, public
sector auditors understand the design and may need to test the operating effectiveness of controls
over the entity’s non-financial information used in analytical procedures.

Investigating Results of Analytical Procedures


P11. Public sector auditors consider that they may have additional responsibilities when management
is unable to provide explanations for differences identified in performing analytical procedures
referred to in paragraph A21 of the ISA. For example, public sector auditors in some audit
environments, such as a Court of Accounts environment, may need to investigate further the
underlying reasons for the lack of information and determine who is responsible.

Definition of Analytical Procedures


P12. In performing analytical procedures, either as substantive analytical procedures or to assist when
forming an overall conclusion, as stated in paragraph A1 of the ISA public sector auditors may
also consider relationships such as:
• Expenditures versus budget or appropriations;
• Benefit payments, such as child support and pensions versus demographic information;
• Tax revenues versus demographic information or economic conditions or indicators;
• Interest as a percentage of national debt compared to the government borrowing rate;
• Results accomplished in relation to expenditure, where performance information is included as
part of the financial statements; and
• Government grants for economic and social development, e.g. grants for low income farmers
and grants for school buildings, versus economic and demographic indicators.
In order to be an effective procedure, such tests need to be at an appropriate level of detail.


Analytical Procedures

You might also like