Attorney NOTICE of Fraud Upon Court: Case Number
Attorney NOTICE of Fraud Upon Court: Case Number
_________________________________ _____________________________________________
1. I have and maintain full compliance with my Oath. See: AO 153 Attorney Oath on Admission
2. I have never been disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command.
401.
3. I have never willfully disobeying any lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command of
any court. 402.
4. I have never advocated the obstruction of court orders, obstructed court orders or interfered in
court orders. 1509.
5. makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry 1001
6. I have never allowed, been aware of perjury nor have I done Subornation of Perjury on behalf of my
client, in order to obstruct a court order, further a case, or to get back at someone. 1622
7. Obstruction of court orders I have never willfully prevented, obstructed, impeded, or interfered
with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of
rights. 1509.
8. I have never conspired with a private citizen, as an attorney and or with state actor, to kidnap.
1983.
9. I have never conspired to do any overt act to assist in custodial interference.
10. I have never advocated that my client abduct, restrain, confine or carry away the children.
11. I have never assisted in an abduction or wrongful retention of children against a court order.
12. I have never opposed the return of the children once my client failed to prove her accusations.
TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 121 > § 11601. abduction or wrongful retention of children
(2) Persons should not be permitted to obtain custody of children by virtue of their wrongful removal
or retention.
TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 121 > § 11603 Child Abduction Judicial remedies
(B) in the case of an action for arrangements for organizing or securing the effective exercise of rights
of access, that the petitioner has such rights.
(2) In the case of an action for the return of a child, a respondent who opposes the return of the child
has the burden of establishing—
(A) by clear and convincing evidence that one of the exceptions set forth in article 13b or 20 of the
Convention applies; and
(B) by a preponderance of the evidence that any other exception set forth in article 12 or 13 of the
Convention applies.
Article XI.
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity,
commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or
Subjects of any Foreign State.
US citizens (FEDERAL CITIZENS) are FOREIGN to the several States and SUBJECTS of the FEDERAL
UNITED STATES/STATE of NEW COLUMBIA/DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
ATTORNIES are considered FOREIGN AGENTS under the FOREIGN AGENTS
REGISTRATION ACT (FARA) and are SUBJECTS of the BAR ASSOCIATION.
Government Is Foreclosed from Parity with Real People
– Supreme Court of the United States 1795
"An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness".
(Trinsey v. Pagliaro D.C.Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647)
This applies both with Federal Rules of Evidence and State Rules of Evidence.... there must be a
competent first hand witness (a body). Their has to be a real person making the complaint and bringing
evidence before the court. Corporations are paper and can't testify.
"The prosecutor is not a witness; and he should not be permitted to add to the record either by subtle or
gross improprieties. Those who have experienced the full thrust of the power of government when
leveled against them know that the only protection the citizen has is in the requirement for a fair
trial." Donnelly v. Dechristoforo, 1974.SCT.41709 <http://www.versuslaw.com> ¶ 56; 416 U.S. 637
(1974) Mr. Justice Douglas, dissenting.
"Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not sufficient for motion to dismiss or for summary
judgment," Trinsey v. Pagliaro, D. C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647.
"Factual statements or documents appearing only in briefs shall not be deemed to be a part of the record
in the case, unless specifically permitted by the Court " – Oklahoma Court Rules and Procedure,
Federal local rule 7.1(h).
Frunzar v. Allied Property and Casualty Ins. Co. (Iowa 1996)† 548 N.W.2d 880 Professional
statements of litigants attorney are treated as affidavits, and attorney making statements may be cross-
examined regarding substance of statement. [And, how many of those Ass-Holes have "first hand
knowledge"? NONE!!!]
Porter v. Porter (N.D. 1979 ) 274 N.W.2d 235 ñ The practice of an attorney filing an affidavit on behalf
of his client asserting the status of that client is not approved, inasmuch as not only does the affidavit
become hearsay, but it places the attorney in a position of witness thus compromising his role as
advocate.