Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Attorney NOTICE of Fraud Upon Court

_________________________________ _____________________________________________

Case Number: Attorney Notice

BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON THE ACCUSER! No proof, no abduction!

1. I have and maintain full compliance with my Oath. See: AO 153 Attorney Oath on Admission
2. I have never been disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command.
401.
3. I have never willfully disobeying any lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command of
any court. 402.
4. I have never advocated the obstruction of court orders, obstructed court orders or interfered in
court orders. 1509.
5. makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry 1001
6. I have never allowed, been aware of perjury nor have I done Subornation of Perjury on behalf of my
client, in order to obstruct a court order, further a case, or to get back at someone. 1622
7. Obstruction of court orders I have never willfully prevented, obstructed, impeded, or interfered
with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of
rights. 1509.
8. I have never conspired with a private citizen, as an attorney and or with state actor, to kidnap.
1983.
9. I have never conspired to do any overt act to assist in custodial interference.
10. I have never advocated that my client abduct, restrain, confine or carry away the children.
11. I have never assisted in an abduction or wrongful retention of children against a court order.
12. I have never opposed the return of the children once my client failed to prove her accusations.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 21 > § 401. Power of court


A court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion,
such contempt of its authority, and none other, as
(1) Misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of
justice;
(2) Misbehavior of any of its officers in their official transactions;
(3) Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 21 > § 402 Contempt


Any person, corporation or association willfully disobeying any lawful writ, process, order, rule,
decree, or command of any district court of the United States or any court of the District of
Columbia, by doing any act or thing therein, or thereby forbidden, if the act or thing so done be
of such character as to constitute also a criminal offense under any statute of the United States or
under the laws of any State in which the act was committed, shall be prosecuted for such
contempt as provided in section 3691 of this title and shall be punished by a fine under this title
or imprisonment, or both.
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 47 > § 1001
§ 1001. Statements or entries generally
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the
executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material
fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5
years, or both.
(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for
statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or
magistrate in that proceeding.
(c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply
only to—
(1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of
property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document
required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer
within the legislative branch; or
(2) any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee,
subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the
House or Senate.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 79 > § 1622 Subornation of Perjury


Sec. 1622. Subornation of perjury
Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 73 > § 1509


TITLE 18--CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I--CRIMES CHAPTER 73--OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
Sec. 1509. Obstruction of court orders
Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully
attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of
duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on
the ground that such conduct is a crime.

A PRIVATE CITIZEN BE HELD LIABLE UNDER § 1983


While a private citizen cannot ordinarily be held liable under § 1983 because that statute requires
action under color of state law, if a private citizen conspires with a state actor, then the private citizen
is subject to § 1983 liability. Brokaw v. Mercer County, 235 F.3d 1000 (7th Cir 2001) quoting
Bowman v. City of Franklin, 980 F.2d 1104, 1107 (7th Cir. 1992) "To establish § 1983 liability
through a conspiracy theory, a plaintiff must demonstrate that: (1) a state official and private
individual(s) reached an understanding to deprive the plaintiff of his constitutional rights, and (2) those
individual(s) were willful participants in joint activity with the State or its agents." Fries v. Helsper,
146 F.3d 452, 457 (7th Cir. 1998) (internal quotation and citations omitted).
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 55 > § 1201. Kidnapping, abduction, or unlawful restraint
If two or more persons conspire to violate this section and one or more of such persons do any overt
act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years
or for life.

TITLE 18 > PART II > CHAPTER 227 > § 3559


(C) the term “kidnapping” means an offense that has as its elements the abduction, restraining,
confining, or carrying away of another person by force or threat of force;

TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 121 > § 11601. abduction or wrongful retention of children
(2) Persons should not be permitted to obtain custody of children by virtue of their wrongful removal
or retention.

TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 121 > § 11603 Child Abduction Judicial remedies
(B) in the case of an action for arrangements for organizing or securing the effective exercise of rights
of access, that the petitioner has such rights.
(2) In the case of an action for the return of a child, a respondent who opposes the return of the child
has the burden of establishing—
(A) by clear and convincing evidence that one of the exceptions set forth in article 13b or 20 of the
Convention applies; and
(B) by a preponderance of the evidence that any other exception set forth in article 12 or 13 of the
Convention applies.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > § 2 Principals aids, abets,


(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces
or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.
(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would
be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > § 2 Principals


(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces
or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.
(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would
be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > § 4 Misprision of felony


Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United
States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person
in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than three years, or both.

TITLE 28 > PART II > CHAPTER 31 > § 528


§ 528. Disqualification of officers and employees of the Department of Justice
The Attorney General shall promulgate rules and regulations which require the disqualification of any officer or
employee of the Department of Justice, including a United States attorney or a member of such attorney’s staff, from
participation in a particular investigation or prosecution if such participation may result in a personal, financial, or
political conflict of interest, or the appearance thereof. Such rules and regulations may provide that a willful
violation of any provision thereof shall result in removal from office.
EXHIBIT 022 - NOTICE OF ATTORNEYS NOT ALLOWED TO
TESTIFY
 
It’s a VIOLATION of the 11th Amendment for a FOREIGN CITIZEN to INVOKE the JUDICIAL POWER of
the State.

Article XI.
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity,
commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or
Subjects of any Foreign State.

US citizens (FEDERAL CITIZENS) are FOREIGN to the several States and SUBJECTS of the FEDERAL
UNITED STATES/STATE of NEW COLUMBIA/DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
ATTORNIES are considered FOREIGN AGENTS under the FOREIGN AGENTS 
REGISTRATION ACT (FARA) and are SUBJECTS of the BAR ASSOCIATION.
 
Government Is Foreclosed from Parity with Real People
– Supreme Court of the United States 1795

"An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness". 
(Trinsey v. Pagliaro D.C.Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647)

This applies both with Federal Rules of Evidence and State Rules of Evidence.... there must be a
competent first hand witness (a body). Their has to be a real person making the complaint and bringing
evidence before the court. Corporations are paper and can't testify.
 
"The prosecutor is not a witness; and he should not be permitted to add to the record either by subtle or
gross improprieties. Those who have experienced the full thrust of the power of government when
leveled against them know that the only protection the citizen has is in the requirement for a fair
trial." Donnelly v. Dechristoforo, 1974.SCT.41709 <http://www.versuslaw.com> ¶ 56; 416 U.S. 637
(1974) Mr. Justice Douglas, dissenting.
 
"Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not sufficient for motion to dismiss or for summary
judgment," Trinsey v. Pagliaro, D. C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647.
 
"Factual statements or documents appearing only in briefs shall not be deemed to be a part of the record
in the case, unless specifically permitted by the Court " – Oklahoma Court Rules and Procedure,
Federal local rule 7.1(h).
 
Frunzar v. Allied Property and Casualty Ins. Co. (Iowa 1996)† 548 N.W.2d 880 Professional
statements of litigants attorney are treated as affidavits, and attorney making statements may be cross-
examined regarding substance of statement. [And, how many of those Ass-Holes have "first hand
knowledge"? NONE!!!]

Porter v. Porter (N.D. 1979 ) 274 N.W.2d 235 ñ The practice of an attorney filing an affidavit on behalf
of his client asserting the status of that client is not approved, inasmuch as not only does the affidavit
become hearsay, but it places the attorney in a position of witness thus compromising his role as
advocate.

You might also like