Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

The Patriot Act: When Truth Becomes

Treason
By Susan Lindauer

May 27, 2011 "The Peoples Voice" - May 23, 2011 --  Many Americans
think they understand the dangers of the Patriot Act, which Congress has
vowed to extend 4 more years in a vote later this week. Trust me when I
say, Americans are not nearly frightened enough.

Ever wonder why the truth about 9/11 never got exposed? Why Americans
don't have a clue about leadership fraud surrounding the War on Terror?
Why Americans don't know if the 9/11 investigation was really successful?
Why the Iraqi Peace Option draws a blank? Somebody has known the
whereabouts of Osama bin Laden--- or his grave—for the past 10 years.
But nobody's talking to the people.

In significant part, that's because of the Patriot Act--- a law that equates
free speech with sedition. It's got a big agenda, with 7,000 pages of
Machiavellian code designed to interrupt individual questioning of
government policy. In this brave new world, free speech under the Bill of
Rights effectively has been declared a threat to government controls for
maintaining stability. And the Patriot Act has become the premiere weapon
to attack whistle blowers and dissidents who challenge the comfort of
political leaders hiding inconvenient truths from the public. It's all the rage
on Capitol Hill, as leaders strive to score TV ratings, while demogauging
their "outstanding leadership performance" on everything from national
security to environmental policy.

Truth has Become Treason

But wait---Congress assures us the Patriot Act only targets foreigners, who
come to our shores seeking to destroy our way of life through violent,
criminal acts. Good, law abiding Americans have nothing to fear. The
Patriot Act restricts its powers of "roving wiretaps" and warrantless
searches to international communications among "bad guys." Congress has
sworn, with hand on heart, it's only purpose is breaking down terrorist cells
and hunting out "lone wolf" mad men.

That's what they told you, right? And you believed them? You trust the
government. Well, that was your first mistake. With regards to the Patriot
Act, it's a fatal one. Would the government lie to you? You betcha! And
they have.

The Patriot Act reaches far beyond terrorism prevention. In my home state
of Maryland, State Police invoked the Patriot Act to run surveillance on the
Chesapeake Climate Action Network dedicated to wind power, recycling
and protection of the Chesapeake Bay. They infiltrated the DC Anti War
Network, suggesting the group might be a front for "white supremacists,"
and Amnesty International, claiming to investigate "civil rights abuses."
Opponents of the death penalty also got targeted (in case they got violent).

Bottom line: truth tellers who give Americans too much insight on any
number of issues are vulnerable to a vast arsenal of judicial weapons
typically associated with China or Myanmar. In the Patriot Act, the
government has created a powerful tool to hunt out free thinking on the left
or right. It doesn't discriminate. Anyone who opposes government policy is
at risk.

How do I know all this? Because I was the second non-Arab American ever
indicted on the Patriot Act. My arrest defied all expectations about the law.
I was no terrorist plotting to explode the Washington Monument. Quite the
opposite, I had worked in anti-terrorism for almost a decade, covering Iraq
and Libya, Yemen, Egypt and Malaysia at the United Nations. At the
instruction of my CIA handler, I had delivered advance warnings about the
9/11 attack to the private staff of Attorney General John Ashcroft and the
Office of Counter-Terrorism in August, 2001. FBI wire taps prove that I
carried details of a comprehensive peace framework with Iraq up and down
the hallowed corridors of Capitol Hill for months before the invasion,
arguing that War was totally unnecessary.

I delivered those papers to Democrats and Republicans alike; to my own


second cousin, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card; and to Secretary
of State Colin Powell, who lived next door to my CIA handler. Gratis of
the Patriot Act, we had the manila envelope and my hand written notes to
Secretary Powell, dated a week before his infamous speech at the United
Nations. My papers argued that no WMDs would be found inside Iraq, and
that the peace framework could achieve all U.S. objectives without firing a
shot.

In short, I was an Asset who loudly opposed War with Iraq, and made
every effort to correct the mistakes in assumptions on Capitol Hill.

Then I did the unthinkable. I phoned the offices of Senator Trent Lott and
Senator John McCain, requesting to testify before a brand new, blue ribbon
Commission investigating Pre-War Intelligence. Proud and confident of my
efforts, I had no idea Congress was planning to blame "bad intelligence"
for the unpopular War.

Over night I became Public Enemy Number One on Capitol Hill.

Thirty days later I awoke to hear FBI agents pounding on my door. My


nightmare on the Patriot Act lasted 5 years--- Four years after my arrest,
the Court granted me one morning of evidentiary testimony by two
supremely credible witnesses. Parke Godfrey verified my 9/11 warnings
under oath. Otherwise, I never got my day in Court.

The Patriot Act's Arsenal to Stop Free Speech

If you care about America and the traditions of freedom, whether you're
progressive or conservative, you should be angry about this law.

First come the warrantless searches and FBI tracking surveillance. My


work in anti-terrorism gave me no protection. I got my first warrantless
search after meeting an undercover FBI agent to discuss my support for
free elections in Iraq and my opposition to torture and sexual humiliation of
Iraqi detainees. (Sorry guys, body wires don't lie.)

If truth tellers don't get the message to shut their mouths, the Justice
Department ratchets up the pressure. Defendants face secret charges, secret
evidence and secret grand jury testimony. Throughout five years of
indictment, my attorneys and I never got to read a single FBI interview or
grand jury statement. Under the Patriot Act, the whistleblower/defendant
has no right to know who has accused him or her of what criminal
activities, or the dates of the alleged offenses, or what laws got broken.

Of course, I was able to piece together my activities. I knew that "sometime


in October, 2001" an Iraqi diplomat gave me the English translation of a
book on depleted uranium, which showed how cancer rates and birth
defects had spiked in Iraqi children.

And I was quite certain that on October 14, 1999, an Iraqi diplomat asked
me how to channel major financial contributions to the Presidential
Campaign of George Bush and Dick Cheney. The Justice Department got
the date from me, since I reported my conversation immediately to my
Defense Intelligence handler, Paul Hoven.

It's unlikely the grand jury knew that, since the Justice Department has the
prerogative to keep a grand jury in the dark. In this brave new world, a
grand jury can be compelled to consider indictments carrying 10 years or
more in prison, without the right to review evidence, or otherwise
determine whether an individual's actions rise to the level of criminal
activity at all.

That's just the beginning. Once Congress scores an indictment against a


political opponent, the Justice Department can force Defense attorneys to
undergo protracted security clearances, while the whistle blower cum
defendant waits in prison -- usually in solitary confinement or the SHU.
After the security clearance, prosecutors have an ironclad right to bar
attorneys from communicating communications from the prosecution to the
defendant, on threat of disbarment, stiff fines or prison sentence.

Scared yet? Once you get to trial, the situation gets much worse. The
Patriot Act declares that a prosecutor has no obligation to show evidence of
criminal activity to a jury at all. And the Defense can be denied the right to
argue a rebuttal to those secret charges, because it requires speculation that
might mislead the jury—or might expose issues that the government
considers, well, secret. After all that a Judge can instruct a jury that the
prosecution regards the secret evidence as sufficient to merit conviction on
the secret charges. The Jury can be barred from considering the lack of
evidence in weighing whether to convict.

Think I'm exaggerating? You would be wrong. That's what happened to


me. All of it—with one major glitch. All of this presumes the whistle
blower's lucky enough to get a trial. I was denied mine, though I fought
vigorously for my rights. Instead, citing the Patriot Act, I got thrown in
prison on a Texas military base without so much as a hearing—and
threatened with indefinite detention and forcible drugging, to boot.

Americans are not nearly afraid enough.

Neither is Congress. As of this week, members of Congress should be very


afraid. Anyone who votes to extend the Patriot Act should expect to pack
their bags in 2012. They will be targeted for defeat. Above all, the words
"freedom" and "Constitution" will never appear in their campaigns without
suffering extreme public scorn—never, ever again.

Susan Lindauer is the author of "Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story


of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq," which describes
her work as an Asset covering Iraq and Libya, and her arrest on the
Patriot Act shortly after requesting to testify before Congress about the
CIA's advance warnings about 9/11 and a peace option in Iraq.

You might also like