Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Being a lawyer can be 

very rewarding for someone who is passionate


about the law and the responsibilities it comes with. However, the job
can involve lack of work-life balance, stress, pressure, etc. Article
19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees Freedom of Speech
and Expression. In the case of Tata Yellow Pages v. MTNL, the SC
made an important observation. It held that freedom of speech and
expression extends to commercial speech. This includes advertising.
Despite having a thousand lawyers enrolled with bar council every
year, neither law professionals nor the law firms have the right to
advertise their profession. Lawyers are prohibited from doing
anything that might influence prospective client. The prohibition on
advertising is based on the old British notion that law is a “noble
profession”.

Justice Krishna Iyer, in the case of  Bar Council of Maharashtra v.


M.V. Dadholkar, stated that “the canon of ethics and propriety for the
legal profession totally taboo conduct by way of soliciting,
advertising, scrambling and other obnoxious practices, subtle or
clumsiness, for the betterment of the legal business. The law is not a
trade, briefs no merchandise and to the heaven of commercial
competition or procurement should not vulgarise the legal
profession”. This perception about the prohibition stems from the
very fact that the legal profession is considered as a noble profession.

In this era of globalization, where on the one hand advertisements and


promotions are weapons for the professionals, they also act as a
shields for the consumer of the services. The restrictions on the
advertising in the legal profession has its good and bad impact on the
lawyers and the clients. It is the time that the concerned authorities
realize it soon. It is only then, that the dual benefit, both to lawyers
and to the consumers can be served well by making according
required amendment.
However, the Bar Council of India (BCI) has not completely ignored
the developments in the liberalized generation. The BCI recently
decided to amend Rule 36 of the BCI Rules by adding a clause that
allows advocates to maintain websites about themselves or their law
firms to provide information about their business and help people to
make more informed choices. The BCI should not ban advertising per
se. Instead, as long as it promotes legal awareness and gives a chance
to the client to choose the right advocate, it should be permitted. The
BCI should lay down rules related to this matter. This fulfils the need
for advertising and keeping a check and regulating it. In this way, BCI
would retain the regulatory role. This would further allow advocates
to publicize their services. At the same time, clients could exercise
their right to information.

In the present scenario, lawyers have faced the loss of income during
the pandemic and the following lockdown. There have been reports of
suicides and depression. Thus, a petitioner has filed a plea in the
Supreme Court. It prayed that the BCI bring in changes to the BCI
Rules by issuing modification of rules. It also prayed to initiate
modifications under Section 49 of the Advocates Act, 1961.The
recent death by suicide by a 35-year-old advocate indicates the
situation of the advocates. Many advocates are going through a
financial crunch due to the closure of Courts.

The emerging legal service sector is equally beneficial to all


consumers of legal services, without discrimination. In the age of
consumerism and competition law, consumer’s right to free and fair
competition is paramount and cannot be denied by any other
consideration. Trade in legal services focuses on benefits accruing to
consumers from the legal service sector, particularly the quality of
service available with respect to particular fields.
Presently, various legal-tech platforms are sprouting in the legal
domain which allows advocates to list their qualification, expertise,
experience etc., in order to provide a litigator with options to choose
from. The legal profession has relied on word-of-mouth for years
now. A time has come when Indian legal industry should embrace the
change and indulge in the healthy marketing of their brand.
Nonetheless, the Legislature needs to draft certain guidelines for
advertising the legal practice to keep a check on malpractice .
Thus, it can be said that being advertisement a powerful tool used for
making consumers aware about specialisation, achievements and
experiences. Lawyer should be allowed using this in this modern era
keeping the nobility and integrity of this profession maintained.

You might also like