Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Assessment Criteria CUEGIS

    Uploaded by

    Advit
    71 views4 pages
    The document outlines five criteria (A-E) for evaluating business management assessments. Criterion A addresses a student's knowledge and understanding of business concepts. Criterion B focuses on a student's ability to apply concepts to real-world organizations. Criterion C examines the extent to which a student makes reasoned, justified arguments. Criterion D assesses the clarity of a student's structure and organization. Criterion E considers a student's ability to give balanced perspectives of stakeholders. Each criterion includes descriptors for performance levels ranging from 0 to 4 marks.

    Original Description:

    IB Assessment Criteria for CUEGIS Essay

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document outlines five criteria (A-E) for evaluating business management assessments. Criterion A addresses a student's knowledge and understanding of business concepts. Criterion B focuses on a student's ability to apply concepts to real-world organizations. Criterion C examines the extent to which a student makes reasoned, justified arguments. Criterion D assesses the clarity of a student's structure and organization. Criterion E considers a student's ability to give balanced perspectives of stakeholders. Each criterion includes descriptors for performance levels ranging from 0 to 4 marks.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    71 views4 pages

    Assessment Criteria CUEGIS

    Uploaded by

    Advit
    The document outlines five criteria (A-E) for evaluating business management assessments. Criterion A addresses a student's knowledge and understanding of business concepts. Criterion B focuses on a student's ability to apply concepts to real-world organizations. Criterion C examines the extent to which a student makes reasoned, justified arguments. Criterion D assesses the clarity of a student's structure and organization. Criterion E considers a student's ability to give balanced perspectives of stakeholders. Each criterion includes descriptors for performance levels ranging from 0 to 4 marks.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    Criterion 

    A: Knowledge and conceptual understanding  
    This criterion addresses the extent to which the student demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the 
    given concepts and relevant business management content (theories, techniques or tools, depending on the 
    requirements of the question).  
     
    Marks  Level descriptor 

    0  The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.  

    1  Superficial knowledge of the given concepts is demonstrated. Business management content 
    is not selected or the content selected is irrelevant.  

    2  Satisfactory understanding of one or both of the given concepts is demonstrated. Some 
    business management content selected is relevant. The relevant content is satisfactorily 
    explained.  

    3  Good understanding of one or both of the given concepts is demonstrated. The business 
    management content selected is relevant, though it may not be sufficient. The relevant 
    content is generally well explained, though the explanation may lack some depth or breadth. 

    4  Good understanding of both of the given concepts is demonstrated. The business 
    management content selected is relevant, sufficient and well explained. 
     
     
    Criterion B: Application  
    This criterion addresses the extent to which the student is able to apply the given concepts and the relevant 
    business management content (theories, techniques or tools, depending on the requirements of the 
    question) to his or her chosen real­world organization(s). The real­world organization(s) must not be the 
    organization featured in the prescribed case study for paper 1.  
     
    Marks  Level descriptor 

    0  The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.  

    1  The given concepts and/or any relevant business management content are connected to the 
    real­world organization(s), but this connection is inappropriate or superficial.  

    2  The given concepts and/or relevant business management content are connected 
    appropriately to the real­world organization(s), but this connection is not developed.  

    3  The given concepts and relevant business management content are generally well applied to 
    explain the situation and issues of the real­world organization(s), though the explanation may 
    lack some depth or breadth. Examples are provided.  

    4  The given concepts and relevant business management content are well applied to explain 
    the situation and issues of the real­world organization(s). Examples are appropriate and 
    illustrative. 
     
     
    Criterion C: Reasoned arguments  
    This criterion assesses the extent to which the student makes reasoned arguments. This includes making 
    relevant and balanced arguments by, for example, exploring different practices, weighing up their strengths 
    and weaknesses, comparing and contrasting them or considering their implications, depending on the 
    requirements of the question. It also includes justifying the arguments by presenting reasonable evidence or 
    other support for the claims made.  
     
    Marks  Level descriptor 

    0  The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.  

    1  Statements are made but these are superficial.  

    2  Relevant arguments are made but these are mostly unjustified. 

    3  Relevant arguments are made and these are mostly justified. 

    4  Relevant, balanced arguments are made and these are well justified. 
     
    Criterion D: Structure  
    This criterion assesses the extent to which the student organizes his or her ideas with clarity, and presents 
    a structured piece of writing comprised of: 
    ● an introduction 
    ● a body  
    ● a conclusion  
    ● fit­for­purpose paragraphs.  
     
    Marks  Level descriptor 

    0  The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.  

    1  Two or fewer of the structural elements are present, and few ideas are clearly organized.   

    2  Three of the structural elements are present, or most ideas are clearly organized. 

    3  Three or four of the structural elements are present, and most ideas are clearly organized.  

    4  All of the structural elements are present, and ideas are clearly organized. 
       
    Criterion E: Individuals and societies  
    This criterion assesses the extent to which the student is able to give balanced consideration to the 
    perspectives of a range of relevant stakeholders, including individuals and groups internal and external to the 
    organization.  
     
    Marks  Level descriptor 

    0  The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.  

    1  One individual or group perspective is considered superficially or inappropriately.   

    2  One relevant individual or group perspective is considered appropriately, or two relevant 
    individual or group perspectives are considered superficially or inappropriately. 

    3  At least two relevant individual or group perspectives are considered appropriately. 

    4  Balanced consideration is given to relevant individual and group perspectives. 
     
     

    You might also like