Collecting, Documenting & Reporting Private Security: A Practical Guide For Civil Society
Collecting, Documenting & Reporting Private Security: A Practical Guide For Civil Society
DOCUMENTING
& REPORTING
on PRIVATE
SECURITY
A PRACTICAL GUIDE
FOR CIVIL SOCIETY
International
Code of Conduct
Association
January 2021 COLLECTING,
DOCUMENTING
A PRACTICAL GUIDE
& REPORTING FOR CIVIL SOCIETY
to support implementation
onPRIVATE of the International Code
of Conduct for Private
SECURITY Security Service Providers
Collecting Information
About DCAF
CHAPTER
2
on Private Security
1. Differentiating private security
Since 2000, DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance has
from other security actors
facilitated, driven and shaped security sector reform (SSR) policy and
programming around the world. DCAF assists partner states in developing 2. Identifying applicable standards
laws, institutions, policies and practices to improve the governance of 3. Selecting information sources
their security sector through inclusive and participatory reforms based on
international norms and good practices. DCAF creates innovative knowl-
Documenting and Reporting
edge products, promotes norms and good practices, and provides legal and
policy advice. The Centre also supports capacity building of state, civil
society and private sector stakeholders by providing access to independent
CHAPTER
3
on Private Security
expertise and information on Security Sector Governance and Reform 1. Documenting
(SSG/R). • Key considerations before
documenting and reporting
• Private security documentation checklist
Supported by
2. Reporting
• Information that is pertinent for civil society
• Reporting mechanisms regarding
private security
CONCLUSION
2 3
Introduction
ACKNOWLEGEMENTS
This tool was developed by the International Code of Conduct Association (ICoCA)
OBJECTIVE & PURPOSE OF THE TOOL
and DCAF – Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance. ICoCA and DCAF
would like to sincerely thank the 16 civil society organisations across Latin America The private security industry has grown exponentially in many countries
and Africa for responding to questionnaires to inform the tool development meth- in the last quarter of century and is oftentimes larger than police, military
odology. A special recognition also goes to ICoCA and DCAF partner Observatoire and prison services combined. Despite its weight in the security, economic
d’Etudes et d’Appui à la Responsabilité Sociale et Environnementale (OEARSE) and social sectors of countries, there is a general lack of information and
based in DRC for coordinating the research of 13 civil society organisations on the data on the size and numbers of private security companies and employ-
ground and for the input and advice provided throughout the project. A big thanks ees as well as on the exact nature of their operations and activities.
goes also to the 13 civil society organisations based in DRC for their input, research
and continuous feedback to make the tool as practical as possible. In many contexts, national legal frameworks and policies do not effec-
tively regulate the industry and there is a lack of oversight. This leads
Lastly, ICoCA and DCAF would like to express their sincere gratitude for the generous to an increased risk of human rights abuses, such as sexual harassment,
support of the UK Government and the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign exploitation and abuse and excessive use of force.
Affairs Peace and Human Rights Division in making this project possible.
Civil society plays a fundamental role in promoting a better understand-
ACRONYMS ing of private security, ensuring that violations are reported and that
applicable national laws and policies address all relevant issues.
CSO Civil Society Organisation
DCAF Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance This tool provides guidance to civil society organisations (CSOs) in
collecting, documenting and reporting on private security. For this, it
DRC Democratic Republic of Congo draws on the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service
FARDC Forces armées de la République démocratique du Congo Providers (the Code). This Code articulates important principles for
private security companies based on human rights and international
ICoCA International Code of Conduct Association (ICoCA)
humanitarian law, including the prohibition of torture, human trafficking,
The Code International Code of Conduct for Private Security and rules on the use of force. It serves as a useful reference to ensure
Service Providers good private security governance and therefore to prevent and address
human rights abuses by private security companies. The Code is over-
ISO International Organization for Standardization
seen by the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service
ISWAP Islamic State in West Africa Province Providers’ Association (ICoCA) a multi-stakeholder initiative formed in
MSF Médecins sans Frontières 2013 that brings together governments, civil society organisations and
private security companies.
NGO Non-Governmental Organization
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
OHCHR Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Human Rights
PNC Police Nationale Congolaise
PSC Private Security Companies
UNGPs UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
VPs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights
4 5
HOW TO USE THIS TOOL Human rights monitoring is a specialized function that requires sound
substantive knowledge, a distinct set of technical skills and the applica-
This tool addresses CSOs that work in the field of human rights protec- tion of thorough methodologies. If you would like to learn more about
tion and are interested in contributing to good private security gover- human rights monitoring specifically, you may find this resource useful:
nance. This tool assumes that CSOs have access to monitoring guidance Manual on Human Rights Monitoring (OHCHR): searchlibrary.ohchr.org/re-
and seeks to offer a specialised complement to such guidance by provid- cord/4835?ln=en This Manual was developed by the Office of the United
ing insight on collecting, documenting and reporting on private security Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and integrates
specifically. It provides an overview of international norms and standards the experience and good practices developed by OHCHR’s human rights
applying to private security and includes good practices and additional officers over two decades of fieldwork, including guidance on analysis,
elements to consider when integrating a private security focus in larger protection of witnesses, victims and sources, and monitoring of economic,
human rights promotion and protection work. social and cultural rights.
While this tool contains a core structure that is applicable to all contexts,
some sections are meant to be adapted for each setting as the private
security landscape changes from country to country. These sections
include boxes entitled “in context” where country specific information
IN CONTEXT
can be added.
Are there manuals and monitoring tools available offering CSOs guidance
on how to monitor and document human rights abuses?
THE FIRST CHAPTER lays out the role of civil society in private security
governance by highlighting the particularity of the sector and its charac-
teristics, through demonstrating how this sector’s operations can present
a risk for human rights and providing insights into the role civil society
can play in preventing and mitigating human rights abuses by private
security companies.
6 7
Civil Society and Private
1 Security Governance
1.1 WHAT IS PRIVATE SECURITY?
In the last 20 years, there has been a world-wide increase in the number
of private security companies (PSCs). The role of PSCs is especially
visible where there is insufficient provision of security services by the
State, or when natural disasters or armed violence make it necessary to
strengthen security measures.
$
244 20+ 50 %
BILLION MILLION
Market value Number of Of the world’s
of the private private security population live
security industry workers in countries where
per year worldwide private security
workers outnumber
public police
officers
LACK OF AVAILABLE
IN CONTEXT DATA & INFORMATION
LACK OF OVERSIGHT
COMPLEX BUSINESS
RELATIONSHIPS
A lack of capacity to monitor the industry, its evolving and diverse nature, In many contexts, private security guards seem to execute the same
untransparent practices and exponential growth may be reasons for a lack services as public security officers. They could be performing a summary
of official data on the private security sector in many states, i.e. numbers, search of individuals, conducting investigations on specific criminal and/or
size, services, activities, etc. civil cases, ask for individuals’ identity papers etc. In addition, public and
private security often work together in mixed teams. For example, armed
The lack of data results in low levels of awareness in many societies about police cooperate with private security teams– this is especially the case in
the nature of private security services, how these are regulated and how countries where private security companies are prohibited from carrying
they differ from public security. Also, there is often no effective dem- firearms. “Rapid intervention teams” are manned by both private security
ocratic oversight of private security. This makes it challenging to know guards and police and stand ready in case of emergency. Corporate trans-
about the prevalence of human rights abuses and formulate strategies to ports can be escorted by units manned by both police and private secu-
prevent them. rity. In some countries, private security companies provide training to po-
lice units. Additionally, they can switch between public and private: often
A low level of awareness within domestic human rights constituencies, public security personnel hired for private security shifts in their free time
the increased privatisation of security, along with the withdrawal of the to augment their salary. As a result, citizens may struggle in distinguishing
state in a number of areas, lead to the fact that human rights abuses or between the type of actor they are encountering and the competences
other misconduct go unreported. they have. For public and private security there are different rules regard-
ing use of force, searching or arresting people, etc. Mixed public-private
teams make it also challenging to determine who controls and commands
IN CONTEXT and ultimately who is responsible and accountable for misconduct.
IN CONTEXT
With the constant evolution of the private security industry, the need for The private security industry operates both at the international and na-
effective regulation has increased. Many states lack adequate national legal tional levels. The sector is constituted by both multinationals operating in
frameworks and resources to regulate and oversee the private security multiple sites all over the world and small businesses present in one com-
industry and thus to prevent/address human rights abuses or other mis- munity village. For example, some private security companies have over
conduct by companies or their personnel. Often states do not have laws 100’000 employees serving clients across countries. Sometimes, these
in place regulating private security services specifically, including on the international PSCs work through subsidiaries, companies which have a
use of firearms, storage of ammunition, working conditions and training. distinct legal entity for the purpose of taxation, regulation or liability but
Authorities in charge of the licensing of private security companies are they are owned/controlled by the parent company. Often international
in many cases located in the Ministries of Interior and have often limited PSCs rely on subcontractors, local PSCs in-country, to deliver the service.
expertise and resources to monitor the industry. Local PSCs may just operate in that specific area or have offices across
the country. For international clients, a combination of international and
local PSCs could be considered as the optimum solution. This in principle
ensures respect for international standards as well as local embeddedness.
IN CONTEXT However, these setups can make it difficult to establish accountability and
responsibility as there is often a lack of transparency in the relationships
between private security companies and their subcontractors. The diffi-
cult question to address for civil society is to establish accountability and
responsibility when private security companies’ headquarters are abroad
or when a company subcontracts the services to another company.
EXAMPLE
USA
1.5X China
~2X
India
~5X
Brazil
2X South
Africa
2.5X
1
Due to the challenges and complexity linked to private security outlined STATE DUTY TO PROTECT HUMAN RIGHTS
above, this industry poses a specific risk for the protection of human rights.
States have the responsibility to respect, protect and fulfil international
human rights law obligations within their jurisdiction. This includes the
duty to protect against human rights abuse by third parties, including
“ Quite simply, because of the types of services that private security companies business enterprises.
provide, they are in a position to violate human rights in numerous different
ways. For example, PSC personnel may carry weapons which impacts on the
2
THE CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY TO RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS
right to life or they may be involved in detaining individuals which impacts
on the right to liberty as well as the right to be free from torture and inhuman Businesses must act with due diligence to avoid infringing on the
rights of others and to address any negative impacts for individuals
and degrading treatment. They may also be linked to negative human rights
and communities. This includes for example conducting human rights
impacts through their government clients as well as their business relation- impact assessments.
ships. In addition, the increasing privatisation and outsourcing of security
by states means that the security industry is expanding rapidly into new
3
ACCESS TO REMEDY FOR VICTIMS OF BUSINESS-RELATED ABUSE
spheres of operation, this in turn means that the risk of human rights vio-
lations increases. The difficulty is that there is limited oversight of PSCs in Access to remedy for victims of business-related abuses: This includes
both the state and corporate responsibility to provide access to remedy.
relation to human rights.”*
As part of their duty to protect individuals within their jurisdiction
from business-related human rights abuse, states must ensure that
when such abuses occur under their jurisdiction those affected have
Where there is limited oversight and weak legal frameworks, it is not
access to an effective remedy through judicial, administrative, and
always clear how PSCs can be held accountable for human rights abuses.
legislative means.
As human rights are primarily applicable to states, their enforceability with
the corporate sector has been subject to debate in the international are-
na for many years. As a response, in 2011 the UN Human Rights Council When a private security company has infringed the human rights of an
adopted the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) individual, this individual should have access to a mechanism provided
www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_ by the state in order to access an effective remedy for the violation
en.pdf. These Guiding Principles provide the first global standard for incurred. The corporate responsibility includes preventing and reme-
preventing and addressing the risk of adverse impacts on human rights diating any infringement of rights linked to their actions through for
linked to business activity. They clearly state that while states are the main example a company grievance mechanism or a mechanism developed
subject of human rights’ law, the corporate sector has a duty to respect jointly with communities. Having effective grievance mechanisms
human rights. in place is crucial in upholding the state’s duty to protect and the
corporate responsibility to respect. The UNGPs dictate that such
mechanisms should be legitimate, accessible, predictable, rights-com-
patible, equitable, and transparent.
* Mcleod Sorcha in Whose responsibility? Reflections on accountability of private security in
Southeast Europe, Franziska Klopfer and Nelleke van Amstel (Eds.), DCAF, 2017.
IN CONTEXT
Human Rights Impacted Example
1
assisting alleged victims of private security, working with private security
CSO ROLE
to support human rights compliance through capacity-building etc.
PROMOTE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING
This tool focuses on three interrelated activities that can be conducted OF THE PRIVATE SECURITY INDUSTRY
separately or in sequence:
CSO
ROLE:
Monitoring
Private
Security
2 CSO ROLE
SUPPORTING PRIVATE SECURITY
GOVERNANCE NATIONALLY
CSO
ROLE:
Monitoring
3 CSO ROLE
SUPPORTING PRIVATE SECURITY
GOVERNANCE GLOBALLY
Private
Security
PARTICIPATE IN INITIATIVES aiming to strengthen private
security governance at national, regional (such as the Private
Security Governance Observatory at www.observatoire-se-
curite-privee.org/en) or international level (such as the Inter-
national Code of Conduct Association at www.icoca.ch).
RAISE AWARENESS among clients about
their responsibilities and duty to contract
4
responsible private security services.
CSO ROLE
RAISE AWARENESS about the regulatory BUILDING CAPACITY AND SHARING EXPERTISE
framework and international standards,
expected behavior of private security
Provide CAPACITY-BUILDING on human rights to PSCs.
companies and challenges among
communities and other stakeholders. SUPPORT PSCs in vetting personnel.
IN CONTEXT
OECD
Guidelines for
Multinational
International Entreprises
Code of Conduct
for Private
Security Service National
Providers Law
LAWS, RULES,
PRINCIPLES
AND STANDARDS
UN Guiding
APPLICABLE
Principles on ISO 18788
Business and TO PSCs
Human Rights
(UNGPs)
ISO 28007
PSC.1
Today, the signatory status does not exist anymore, and PSCs can apply • Selection and Vetting of Personnel
for membership on a voluntary basis with the International Code of
Conduct Association (ICoCA). The ICoCA is the body overseeing the • Training of Personnel
implementation of the Code and based in Geneva, Switzerland. The Asso- • Selection and Vetting of Subcontractors
ciation is governed by three groups of Members, namely private security
companies, civil society organisations and governments. • Management of Weapons and Material
of War
The Code sets forth international principles specifically for PSCs operating
in complex environments. These principles are based on human rights • Safe and Healthy Working Environment
and international humanitarian law.
• Incident Reporting
The Code contains two sets of principles that address: • Company Grievance Mechanisms
1. how private security personnel should behave;
• Meeting Liabilities
2. how private security companies should be managed and governed.
Use of Force
?
?
IN CONTEXT
QUESTIONS | Have you observed situations where guards used force?
What happened? What type of weapons (batons, etc.) do private security
guards carry?
A member of a community approaches a private security guard protecting the
mining site. The person holds a tree branch and looks very angry. How should
the guard react?
The Code
The use of force by private security guards is strictly restricted to the defence
of her/himself and to defend others and the property they protect against an
imminent threat.
A guard must always try to de-escalate the situation and use force proportionate
to the threat.
The Code
Private security guards are only allowed to detain persons if state authorities
have asked them to do so and the details are regulated in a contract. For example,
they can decide to outsource the protection of prisons or the guarding, transport
or questioning of prisoners to private security companies. Otherwise detention
by private security guards is prohibited.
In situations, where the state has delegated the authority to detain individuals to
private security companies, these are required to properly train guards detaining
individuals in the applicable national and international law.
Most importantly, guards must treat all detained persons humanely at all times.
The Code
Private security personnel are prohibited in any circumstance to torture individ-
uals, to punish them or treat them in any way which is degrading or inhuman.
Companies must report such acts to their clients and to Competent Authorities.
Competent Authorities may be those of:
• the country where the acts took place,
• the country of nationality of the victim,
• the country of nationality of the perpetrator.
The Code
Private security personnel are not allowed to engage in or be complicit in trafficking
of persons, slavery or child labour.
Guards are required to report any observations or suspicions of such acts to the
company or a Competent Authority.
The Code
Private security personnel are not allowed to:
• engage in sexual exploitation or gender-based violence.
• benefit from sexual exploitation or gender-based violence.
Such behaviour includes for example sexual harassment of a colleague, using pros-
titution, rape.
Where such behaviour took place, the company is recommended to offer assistance
to the harmed individual such as medical aid, psychological support or other help
they might need.
??
QUESTIONS | How do you recognise in your country that vehicles used by
private security are registered with the relevant authorities? Do you recognise
private security guards in your country and for whom they are working?
Identification and Registering
A security guard is involved in a traffic accident and continues driving unharmed.
The injured persons in the other car see how a white car continues driving with a
driver in uniform and a logo on his arm. What can the injured persons do?
The Code
All private security personnel should be identifiable with their name and the com-
pany they are working for, for example through the company logo on their uniform.
The following should be registered and licensed with the relevant national authorities:
• Vehicles;
• Hazardous materials such as ammunition, chemicals, etc.
The Code
Private security companies should select their personnel carefully. When hiring
personnel, companies must check the following:
• The candidate’s identity;
• That the candidate providing security services is not under 18 years of age;
• The candidate’s education history;
• The employment history of a candidate;
• That the candidate has no crime history/criminal record;
• That the candidate has no history of abusing human rights;
• That the candidate has sufficient physical fitness to perform
the assigned duties;
• That the candidate has sufficient mental fitness to perform the assigned duties;
• In case of previous military experience, that the candidate has
not been dishonourably discharged;
• That the candidate has the requisite qualifications as defined by the contract.
Companies must ask candidates applying for a position with a private security
company to authorise access to prior employment and government records.
Companies should keep passports, or other identification documents of their
personnel for the shortest period of time reasonable.
Once the person is hired, a company is required to assess her/his performance on a
regular basis for example through tests and training.
No tolerance for discrimination! When PSCs hire and assess their personnel they
should not discriminate on grounds of race, colour, sex, religion, social origin, social
status, indigenous status, disability, or sexual orientation.
All policies, employment material such as the Code, contract terms and conditions
need to be clearly communicated to personnel and be available in written form and
in a language they can understand.
PSCs need to keep employment records and reports on past and current personnel
for a period of 7 years.
The Code
PSCs are required to train their personnel when they start their job and then on
a regular basis.
The Code
If private security companies decide to subcontract services, they have to eval-
uate them carefully and assess how they respect the Code on a regular basis.
A company needs to make sure that a subcontractor carrying out security services
operates in accordance with the principles of the Code. If a subcontractor is not
operating up to standard, a PSC needs to take measures to remedy that.
The Code
In some countries private security guards are allowed to carry firearms. This is
regulated by national law.
PSCs are required to obtain and maintain authorisations for the possession and
use of weapons, ammunitions and other hazardous materials.
The Code
PSCs are required to ensure that reasonable precautions are taken to protect
relevant staff in high-risk or life-threatening operations.
This includes:
• Assessing the risks of injury to personnel and the local population;
• Provide adequate training to personnel;
• Provide adequate protective equipment, weapons and ammunition;
• Provide medical support;
• Other measures addressing psychological health, deters work-place
violence, misconduct, alcohol and drug abuse, sexual harassment and
other improper behaviour.
Companies should not tolerate harassment and abuse of co-workers.
The Code
PSCs need to document and investigate any incident involving the use of weap-
ons, escalation of force, damage to equipment, injury to persons, attacks criminal
acts, traffic accidents or incidents involving other security forces.
The Code
Every company should be able to receive complaints from its own employees
as well as the public. For people to know about it, what they need to do and
how it works, a company needs to make it known.
Ideally this information is available through a link on their main page of the
website.
Complainants should also have a choice of different communication options
through which they can submit a complaint. Some companies have feedback
boxes, posters or a phone number on their car through which people can reach
them. Sometimes companies or their clients have dedicated staff members who
are in touch with community elders and listen to any concerns people may have.
When companies receive complaints, they are required to acknowledge
receipt of the complaint, investigate the complaint properly and inform the
complainant about next steps and all necessary information.
When complainants meet with company staff in charge of the complaint, they
should be allowed to bring a friend, colleague or family member with them for
their support.
A company also needs to make sure that complainants are protected from any
further harm.
Companies are required to find a solution for the complaint which is fair and
compensates the complainant adequately for the damage experienced. For more information on Company Grievance Mechanisms
www.icoca.ch/en/guidance#1
The Code
Companies need to ensure that they always have sufficient financial capacity
in place to be able to meet commercial liabilities for damages to any person or
property.
INFORMATION SOURCES
Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) worldwide use several channels
to gather information linked to private security. We review each in
turn highlighting tips, best practices and challenges.
IN CONTEXT
Description Alleged victims approach CSOs for help and support. Either
& Process the civil society organisation has the capacity to handle
the case (legal background, expertise) or the CSO guides
the victim to the appropriate organisations/entities. This
information source could potentially provide the most
direct, accurate and detailed account of incidents. When
CSOs seek to support alleged victims either to prevent
further harm or seek remedies, this is the primary chan-
nel of information. However, reliability of alleged victims’
reports needs to be carefully assessed.
The Community/
The General Public
Description In many contexts, working groups are established to The International Code of Conduct Association is a multi-stakeholder
& Process address a specific issue (e.g. local security, human rights, initiative composed by states, private security companies and civil
border management challenges, etc.) either on a regular society organisations. All stakeholders share best practices, exchange
or ad hoc basis. Working groups usually have established information on promoting responsible private security and oversee
procedures, where they either have regular meetings/ implementation of the International Code of Conduct for Private
or include systemised reporting. Such groups potentially Security Service Providers.
allow for coordinated and systematic information collec-
icoca.ch/about/
tion whilst including a variety of expertise and locations.
If groups are composed of stakeholders from the public
and private sector and representing different industries The Voluntary Principles Working Group in South Kivu builds trust in
and functions, information received can come from multistakeholder working settings to increase collaboration between
different angles and perspectives. Such groups some- private sector, civil society organisations, security forces and other
times conduct early warning and prevention of incidents. public authorities. Security and human rights risks in the extractive
(See concrete examples on the next page). sector are jointly identified and addressed.
Risk/ Given that the maintenance of a private security registry The Private Security Governance Observatory is a network of African
Challenges requires considerable resources, the regulatory authority civil society organisations that seeks to share knowledge and rein-
sometimes does not have updated information. In some force their organizational capacity to promote good governance of
contexts, states are affected by issues of corruption and the private sector.
of conflict of interest. For instance, some private security
companies are owned by public officials linked to the Main activities:
authority or have special relationships with some • Research, awareness raising and building a network;
companies. Information from such channels must thus be
carefully assessed. • Support to CSO engagement with national authorities,
companies and other stakeholders at national, regional,
and international levels;
Tips/Good Some CSOs have established formal or informal partner-
Practices ships/relationships with private security authorities to • Experience sharing within and across regions.
exchange information on the sector. Many CSOs stressed observatoire-securite-privee.org/en
that being seen as a credible organisation by the authority
is very important for the quality of the exchange.
Example 2
Armed attackers shoot and kill a PSC guard
protecting an entrance to a mine.
Private Security
3.1 WHAT SHOULD BE DOCUMENTED
• Informed consent:
Always make sure that you have the consent of the
alleged victims before using that information.
n WHEN
Time and Date n MEMBER OR AFFILIATE OF ICoCA • Check the ICoCA website
As ICoCA members or affiliates, PSCs www.icoca.ch
have committed to comply with the • Check if you see a logo on
n WHO WAS INVOLVED the company website, uniform
Code, and to be submitted to ICoCA’s
Possible remedies will be different if • Uniform or other
core function (i.e., certification,
police, army, private security company, • Weapon monitoring and complaints).
client or other actor responsibililty is • Logo
established?
n CERTIFIED • Check for certification logos
To achieve certification, PSCs had to on the website or description
n NAME OF THE PRIVATE SECURITY • Company logo on the uniform/
vehicle or other material demonstrate that they comply with of the company
COMPANY INVOLVED
recognized international standards. • Depending on the nationality
of the company you may also
n NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL • If safe and possible go to the com- check websites of private security
Important information to identify the pany offices associations
different options for contacing the • Check the company website
company. An international company • Check the client website/material
n WHO IS THE CLIENT • Check the company website
can be contacted both in-country or • Check with the regional/
OF THE COMPANY • Reach out to the local community
at the headquarters level national authorities
• If safe, talk to peoople living Clients have a responsibility in the
and working around the location operations of the PSC they hire
where the incident happened, especially when in their service.
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLES Ministry responsible for overseeing
MEDICAL private security companies or their
Hospitals, Médecins sans frontiers (MSF), National Red Cross, Human rights institutions
clients
International Red Cross Courts
Certification Body
LEGAL Private security companies
Legal clinics, specialised CSOs, public services. International Code of Conduct
Clients of private security companies Association
such as oil companies, mines,
African Observatory for Private
embassies,
Security Governance
United Nations
RECOMMENDATION Working groups of the Voluntary
Licensing authority of private Principles for Security Human Rights
Continuously update and have readily available a list of reporting security companies
Mechanisms Linked To The The Montreux Document, which includes good practices for states to
regulate private security companies, recommends that states designate
Private Security Industry a central authority to issue operating licences to every PSC wishing to
offer its services on its territory. Operating licences should be issued for
a limited amount of time and a renewable period based on clear criteria.
Grievance mechanisms of clients of private security companies For private security companies there are specific standards they can get
Clients of private security companies often have grievance mechanisms certified to. For example, ISO 18788 for land-based PSCs, ISO 28007 for
in place. For example, you may want to inform the Embassy protected maritime PSCs, or the US standard PSC.1.
by private security guards or home country of an international company.
If you observe an incident, you may check if the company involved is cer-
Extractive companies have their own grievance mechanisms which are tified and by which Certification Body. You may then report the incident
sometimes managed jointly with the surrounding communities or the to the Certification Body which can revoke the certification if it assesses
private security company protecting the extractive company. Some that the company does no longer meet the specific standard. This may
extractive companies require all complaints against their private security cause the company to lose its clients.
providers to be reported directly to them and not to the private security
provider. Examples
Certification Bodies certifying to standards for private security companies
Humanitarian actors such as the International Committee of the Red Cross include:
(ICRC), Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) or others may have mechanisms • MSS Global, UK: www.mssglobal.com
in place as well.
• Intertek, UK: www.intertek.com
• LRQA, UK: www.lr.org/en-gb/management-systems
• Asociación de Empresas Seguras, Colombia: aes.org.co
2
sations seeking to work on private security governance and oversight.
Request more information from submitter if needed. It should be approached as a living document which can be adapted
to different contexts, depending on the size and nature of the private
3 If conditions are met and with consent of submitter and security industry and its regulatory framework. This tool specifically
alleged victim, ICoCA will contact the member company. addresses civil society organisations that seek to increase their under-
standing of private security, the applicable international standards and
6
tool responds to a call by key stakeholders such as regulators, clients,
ICoCA will monitor implementation of corrective
civil society organisations themselves to support civil society in better
measures by member companies and affiliates.
understanding and monitoring the private security industry as well as in
7
reporting misconduct. However, donors and governments need to step
If company does not cooperate in good faith, possibility
up and support civil society in this important work, as they themselves
for ICoCA to suspend/terminate membership/affiliation.
increasingly use private security services while regulation and oversight
remains often insufficient.
WHO CAN SUBMIT COMPLAINT? Anyone This tool also contributes to raising awareness about the International
Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers across a variety of
stakeholders, notably civil society organisations, private security companies
CONCERN WHO/WHAT? and their clients as well as governments. A result of negotiations between
private security companies, civil society and states, it recalls minimum
Complaint concerning private security company which is either standards based on human rights and international humanitarian law
ICoCA member or affiliate. applicable to private security companies and their personnel. The Code
constitutes a useful frame of reference for any actor in a variety of contexts
Alleging a violation of the International Code of Conduct for Private working on private security. In that sense, this tool is a contribution to
Security Service Providers that has occurred or is about to occur. applying the Code and its standards in practice.
HOW?
Through complaint form on the ICoCA website: www.icoca.ch
Comments and feedback should be sent to:
E-mail to [email protected] [email protected] or [email protected].
90 Chapter 3 | Documenting and Reporting Collecting, Documenting and Reporting | A Practical Guide for Civil Society 91
International
Code of Conduct
Association