Assignment of Major Issues Group2
Assignment of Major Issues Group2
1
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
COTENTS:
Introduction
Pakistan in 2021 as compared to 1947
Explanation of eras
The flat fifties, 1947 to 1958
The golden sixties, 1958 to 1968
Outcomes of the polices are follows in 1960s
Policy failures
The socialist seventies, 1971 to 1977
The democratic period of PPP from 1971 to 1974
The PPP government period from 1976 to 1977
Failures of Bhutto government
The revivalist eighties, 1977 to 1988
Prime Minister JUNAJO`S period (1986 to May 1988)
The muddling nineties, 1988 to 1999
Nawaz Sharif`s period from 1990 to April 1993
Benazir Bhutto`s period from October 1994 to November 1996
The period from February 1997 to 1999
Summary of eras from 1999 to 2021
Conclusion
________________________________
_____________ _
2
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
INTRODUCTION:
Structural transformation is defined as the conversion of an economy from low efficiency and
labor-intensive economic activities to high efficiency and skill intensive activities.
Over the time period, the structure of economy does not remain same. This study examines the
interaction between economic growth and its determinant for Pakistan. Since fixed parameter
approaches do not take into account effect of structural changes on parameter constancy.
As we know that Pakistan got independence on 14th August 1947, and since its emergence its
economy has experienced a lot of changes, i.e, a number of approaches have been followed for
the elevation of its status and multiple verities of politics have been adopted by its authorities
giving rise to different outcomes.
Economic and social outcomes in Pakistan over the last sixty years are a mixture of paradox.
Pakistan economy grew at a fairly impressive rate 0f 6% per year throughout the first four
decades of the nation existence.
In structural transformation it is important to know that How and Where it has taken place in the
different basic factors of economy. As agricultural transformation is being replaced by services
and industrial sectors etc.
For example: In past 60% economy of Pakistan was hooked on agriculture. Now only 40%
economy depends upon agriculture. And other 20% have been disseminated towards other
sectors.
• Pakistan in 2021 as Compared to 1947
3
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
4
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
5
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
Broadly Ayub_Shoib _Haq model of economic development which wes practiced in the
60`s had the following important Features:
1. Irrespective of distributional aspects effects should be made to increase GNP of country.
In this connection Dr. Haq suggested for increasing the incomes of the rich segment of
the economy. Accordingly, the rich class was exempted from the taxes so that their
savings could be boosted up. For this purpose Government provide different incentives
to investors like
Tax rebate
Tax concession
Loans at reduced rates an
Reduced duties on imports
Lack of trade unions
Antimonopoly laws
Provisions of raw material etc.
at reduced rate and provisions of foreign exchange loans to investors.
2. The era of sixties is a representative of free enterprise system where all the controls
were abolished on prices, profits, and imports.
3. Raising the shares of rich in GNP with the view of maximizing the growth rate.
GDP growth rate in this era jumped to an average annual rate of 6 percent from 3
percent in 1950s. The manufacturing sector expended by 9 percent annually various
new industries were set up. Agriculture sector grew respectable rate of 4 percent with
the introduction of Green Revolution technology.
Outcomes of the polices are followed in 1960s :
The model of economic development practiced in Pakistan during this era was highly
applauded by world and other developing countries because it yielded very remaekable
and ostensible quantitative results.
In 1965 war with India forced to divert the resources towards defence. Moreover , the
foreign aid was suspended and there were country _ wide crop failures.19966_67, there
was a severe shortage of food_ grains in the country. Accordingly, 829000 tons of wheat
and 197000 tons of rice had to be imported. In this result inflation is aggravate.
However, during 1967_68 along with improvement in crops and tight monetary policy
the inflation rate was control to same degree.
The fall in agriculture production in 1965_67 had negative effects on the growth of
economy. Even, then it is realized that agriculture sector should be promoted. Green
Revolution was introduced in this era.
In July, 1965 the 3rd five year plan was launched. In this plan government face many
difficulties and problems. Emphasis was laid upon the establishment of consumer goods
industries.
Policy failures:
No increase in Real Wages
6
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
As Bhutto s PPP got the votes as a reaction against GNP ism , therefore the party was aimed at
bringing a structural change in the economy. After devaluation on 11th May 1972 the new
exchange rate was Rs 11, while the previous rate was Rs 4.67
The floods in 1973 also have had a negative impact on the growth of agriculture and industrial
outputs. Such all problems became responsible for building up of inflationary tendencies in the
country.
The next three year of PPP government starting from 1973 to 1974 were very disappointing and
disturbing PPP was a Socialism oriented party and it believed in structural changes in the
economy. It took the steps to enhance the role of public :Publice sector investment went on
increasing while the role of private sector went on decreasing. The act of Nationalization badly
7
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
affect the private industrialists and Businessmen. The sluggish industrial behavior have bad
impact on agriculture sector. In 1976 once again, the economy had to face the devastating
floods which badly affected the major cultivable land.
8
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
Nine different governments ruled in Pakistan in this period. this period face highest political instability.
When new elections were held, PPP of Benazir Bhutto came into the power in 1988. In 1988 to89 the
growth rate was estimated at 6.9%, but the actual growth was 5.1%. Such decline in growth rate was
attributed to:
9
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
In 1989 PPP announced new Industrial Policy, whereby the number of firms was reduced from
12 to 7 for whom`s establishment no prior permission will be required.
Aimed at increasing the role of private sector in the country.
Benazir government was dismiss during 1990 on the charge of corruption. As the result of new
election PML came in to power. Nawaz Sharif Government ruled over the country from 1990 to
1993. Then in October 1993 after new election PPP come back in to rolled.
Therefore, to analyses the economic performance from 1990to1997 will consider two periods:
1. Nawaz Sharif`s period from November 1990 to April 1993.
2. Benazir Bhutto`s period from October 1994 to November 1996.
The results of the reforms introduced by Nawaz sharif government, started coming out.
10
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
2008-2013
11
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
When General Pervez Musharraf resigned, the PPP took control in 2008, and the country once
again suffered economically. The growth saw masssive decline either agricultural or overall
economical growth.
Economic growth slowed down to 4.09%, and the yearly growth fell to 2%.
Agricultural growth: 2%
LSM growth: 4.4%
Average growth rate: 4%
2013-2018
PPP rule continued until 2013, after which the PML-N took charge. The PML-N managed to fix a
crippled economy by using IMF loans. GDP growth saw an increase year-on-year and inflation
dropped for most of their rule. Macro-economic stability ensued and Moody’s declared
Pakistan’s economy stable.
2018-2020
In 2018, the PTI was elected for the first time. Prime Minister Imran Khan was confident that his
party will bring all the statistical success for the Pakistani Economy. However, the party
introduced various economic reforms that had the wrong effect.
GDP growth rate fell to a historic low of 0.99% in 2019, much below the 5.55% in 2017.
Furthermore, macroeconomic stability had diminished as the government added $70 billion in
loans to the already existing debt. The economic situation has been worsened in 2020 by the
coronavirus pandemic, which has erased millions of jobs and plunged the country into a deep
crisis. Analysts have expected low growths in every sector.
Despite the various challenges, Pakistan has progressed a lot. The country managed to become
a semi-industrial one and a hub for business activity.
12
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
Industry 22.04%
9.6%
Services 18.34%
37.2%
1947 53.86%
53% 2019
Conclusion
According to above discussion we concluded that economy of Pakistan is not able to
attain sustainable growth. Because of instability in politics which is followed in all ears
and have been discussed above. Political parties don't pay attention to fulfill their duties
they only focus on to depraved the opponents. Mostly Pakistan economic development
is seeing in those areas in which martial law was imposed.
Political Instability and Economic Growth
Pakistan has had twenty-three governments in last sixty years, including: fourteen
electively appointed prime ministers, five interim governments and thirty-three years
of military rule under four different leaders. Excluding the military and interim
governments, the average life span of a politically elected government has been less
than two years. If the five-year period of Bhutto is excluded, then the average span falls
to 1.6 years.
The economic policy regime, on the other hand, has only changed twice in all of
Pakistan‘s history. The liberal private sector-led growth model that was put in place in
the 1950s and accelerated in the 1960s was rolled back by Bhutto in the 1970s and
became the socialist economic model. Since the rejection of this model in 1977 and the
revival of the liberal model,the general thrust of economic policy has remained
unalterable.
While the government‘s implementation of policies, programs and projects has seen
uneven and confusing results, the initiative in driving the economy can be credited to
the private sector.The agricultural sector, representing 20 percent of GDP, is owned and
managed by private farmers. Only public administration, defense services and public
utilities are directly managed and operated by the government.
Imports and exports of goods and services are also privately managed. A rough
approximation indicates that goods and services are produced, traded and distributed
by the private sector that is about 90 percent or more of the national income. While the
government directly or indirectly owns, manages, controls or regulates the remaining 10
13
Structural Transformation in Pakistan.
percent of national income. So it is the strength of private initiative, with all its flaws,
operating in a relatively liberal policy environment, that has been the main driver of
long-term economic growth
In Pakistan, transitions from one political regime to another have been quite difficult,
causing uncertainty and short-term reductions in the speed of economic growth. The
transfer of power from the military to civilian regimes in 1971, 1988 and 2008 were
marked with macroeconomic instability, a decline in economic activities, rises
unemployment and inflation and the adoption of a wait-and-see attitude by investors.
But economic recovery has also been resilient;short-term losses caused by political
volatility have not been large enough to offset the positive long-term religion economic
movement.
________________________________________________________________________
________
14