Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Officer Involved Shooting - 1-4-2022
Officer Involved Shooting - 1-4-2022
District Attorney
Prosecutorial District 16
Durham County
Clarence Birkhead
Sheriff
Durham County Sheriff’s Office
510 S. Dillard St.
Durham, NC, 27701
Sheriff Birkhead,
I have reviewed the investigation surrounding of the use of force by Durham County Sheriff Deputy Sgt. Timothy J.
Price on January 4, 2022. This case was investigated by the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation, Case File
Number 2022-00016. The purpose of this review was to determine whether the conduct of Sgt. Price was unlawful
when he shot Stephanie Monique Wilson.
This letter specifically does not address law enforcement tactics nor whether Sgt. Price followed proper Durham
County Sheriff’s Office procedure or directives.
1. OVERVIEW
On January 4, 2022, the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation (NCSBI) was requested to
investigate the officer-involved shooting of Stephanie Monique Wilson. On this same date, the NCSBI
responded to 421 John Jones Road, Bahama, North Carolina, and began the investigation. During the
investigation, NCSBI agents interviewed both civilian and law enforcement witnesses and reviewed the following:
• Video and audio footage (including in-car cameras in deputies’ vehicles)
• Social media recordings and text messages
• Law enforcement radio transmissions
• Autopsy photographs and findings
• Durham County Sheriff’s Office records
• Law enforcement and crime scene reports related to the incident
After a thorough review of the NCSBI case file, the Durham County District Attorney's Office will not seek criminal
charges in this matter.
2. STATEMENT OF FACTS
On Tuesday, January 4, 2022, Durham County Sheriff’s Office deputies responded to 421 John Jones Road,
Bahama, North Carolina, in response to a 911 call for service regarding a breaking and entering in progress. The
caller reported being home alone and believes someone was trying to kick in the door. The caller was later
identified as Stephanie Monique Wilson. Deputies who responded included:
• Sgt. Jason Petty
• Deputy Doyle Midgette
Prosecutorial District 16
Durham County
Sgt. Petty and Deputies Midgette and Morgan arrived first on the scene in the same vehicle. Their arrival was
followed closely by the arrival of Sgt. Price and Deputy Kelly in separate vehicles. All vehicles parked in the
driveway of the residence at 421 John Jones Road. Sgt. Petty was concerned about the presence of two German
Shepherd dogs and asked Sheriff’s Office Communications to contact the person requesting the call to retrieve the
dogs. It was at this time that Sgt. Petty noticed Stephanie Monique Wilson standing behind a cinderblock wall
located on the right driveway near the right side of the house. Sgt. Petty saw Wilson holding a black long gun and
shouted “gun” to surrounding deputies. Sgt. Price then yelled that Wilson had “a long gun” that was later
identified as a shotgun. At this point, the deputies took cover behind the vehicles and both Petty and Price
ordered Wilson to drop the gun.
Contemporaneously to the arrival of the deputies, Wilson began a series of Facebook Live videos inside the
residence in which she appears agitated and can be seen loading and racking a shotgun. In the videos, she can also
be seen moving outside the residence. She places her mobile phone down with the Facebook Live still streaming.
The video is fixed on the sky, but the audio continues to record. Wilson can be heard telling viewers that she is in a
“standoff with police.” There is no discernible audio of deputies on the stream, but Wilson is clearly engaged in
conversation with someone. She can be heard saying “Y’all gonna have to shoot me, dawg”, “Make it easier on
both of us” and “I’m not fixing to put this gun down.” Wilson can be heard saying several times that she is not
going to put the gun down. However, she can also be heard telling deputies that she is not going to shoot them.
Wilson can be heard racking the shotgun in the audio.
Sgt. Petty initiated verbal contact, but communication was difficult. Sgt. Price described the scene as “a lot going
on at one time.” Petty tried to talk with Wilson for several minutes to convince Wilson to put the gun down.
Sheriff’s Office Communications established contact with Wilson by phone which appeared to add to the
confusion. The Facebook Live stream ends when Wilson answers. Wilson communicates she is upset and agitated
but Sgt. Petty has trouble understanding why. Wilson repeatedly lifts and points the shotgun at deputies. At this
point, several deputies have arrived and have taken up positions behind the residence and in the woods near the
residence. All had views of Wilson and the shotgun. The final time Wilson lifted the gun, several deputies described
her as taking a “shooting stance.” It was then that Sgt. Price fired a single round. No other deputies fired their
weapons. Wilson sustained a gunshot wound to the right of her neck below the jawline. Deputies Wilson and
Morgan secured the weapon and called for EMS. Wilson was pronounced dead at the scene.
3. LEGAL STANDARD
The use of force by a law enforcement officer in North Carolina is governed by N.C. Gen. Stat§ 15A-401(d)(2),
which states in pertinent part:
Prosecutorial District 16
Durham County
"The reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on
the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight. .. [T]he 'reasonableness' inquiry in an excessive force
case is an objective one: the question is whether the officers' actions are 'objectively reasonable' in light of the
facts and circumstances confronting them, without regard to their underlying intent or motivation" Graham v.
Connor. 490 U.S. 386, 396-97 (1989) (citing Scott v. United States. 436 U.S. 128, 137-139 (1978)); Scott v. Harris.
550 U.S. 372, 383-387 (2007).
The prosecution of any crime related to the death of Ms. Wilson would require proof beyond a reasonable doubt
that Sgt. Price was not legally justified in using deadly force pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat§ 15A-
401(d)(2).
The question, therefore, is whether a reasonable officer in Sgt. Price’s position would have felt that it was
"reasonably necessary" to use deadly force to defend himself and other deputies from what he reasonably
believed to be the use or imminent use of deadly physical force by Ms. Wilson.
The evidence in this case shows that Ms. Wilson was upset on the afternoon of January 4, 2022. Facebook Live
footage and text messages with her roommate and friends indicated that she may have been contemplating
suicide. She initiated a false emergency call to 911 to induce an armed law enforcement response to her home.
When Sherriff deputies arrived, she displayed a shotgun which she pointed at them several times and which
deputies saw her continuously load and unload. Deputies continuously ordered Wilson to disarm – commands to
which she did not respond. When she did respond to commands, Wilson refused to obey and her observed
behavior was erratic and unpredictable.
The evidence from this investigation establishes that a reasonable officer in Sgt. Price’s position would have
believed that he and the other deputies were in danger of imminent deadly physical force from Ms. Wilson.
Prosecutorial District 16
Durham County
Because the totality of the evidence in this case establishes that a reasonable officer in Sgt. Price’s position would
have reasonably believed that Ms. Wilson was preparing herself in a “shooting stance” and that such movement
constituted an imminent threat of deadly physical force, the force used by Sgt. Price was not excessive under the
circumstances.
Therefore, it is my conclusion that there is insufficient evidence to support the filing of criminal charges.
Sincerely,
Satana Deberry
District Attorney, 16th Prosecutorial District