Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 77

MARINE MICROBIOLOGY

The 3rd Edition of this book captures all the recent amazing advances in our understanding of the marine microbiology world
but still manages to present the concepts in a an easy, informative and entertaining way that will engage the novice to the expert.
What a great book and a fun read.
- David Bourne, James Cook University and The Australian Institute of Marine Science

It is great to see another edition of the book given that marine microbiology is such a fast moving and scientifically diverse field.
Munn’s new edition will be a great resource for new students and advanced scientists alike.
- Greta Reintjes, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany

Reading this textbook has made me realise how much the field of marine microbiology has progressed in recent decades.
I recommend this book also to biogeochemists and ecologists in search of the Big Picture of ocean functioning. The many details
of interactions emerging from the microbial world are amazing and shed light on the factors driving evolution of these ancient
ecosystems.
- Victor Smetacek, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany

It has been astonishing to see the evolution of this book over the years. With its many ‘RESEARCH FOCUS’ boxes and
‘SIDEBARS’, this is more than your usual textbook. It is written in an enthusiastic, thought-provoking manner, encompassing
the most up-to-date concepts in marine microbiology. From planktonic tunicates involved in carbon cycling, to viruses infecting
other viruses, this essential read has it all!
- Jozef I. Nissimov, Lecturer in Microbial Oceanography, SAMS, Scottish Marine Institute, UK

Colin B. Munn obtained a BSc (Hons) degree from University College London and a PhD from the University of Birmingham. He
is an Honorary Fellow of the Marine Institute of University of Plymouth, England and was Associate Professor of Microbiology
and Admissions Tutor for Marine Biology programs until 2017. He has a long experience of research in various aspects of
microbiology, with particular interests in the interactions between symbiotic and pathogenic microorganisms and their hosts.
He has held former positions as Visiting Professor at the University of Victoria, Central University of Venezuela and St Georges
University, Grenada and a visiting researcher (Leverhulme Fellow) at James Cook University and the Australian Institute of
Marine Science. He has served as external examiner for Bachelor’s, Master’s, and PhD degrees in many countries and as a special
assessor for molecular and organismal biology for the UK Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. He has extensive
research experience in a range of microbiological topics, with special interest in interactions between pathogenic and symbiotic
microbes and their hosts.
MARINE MICROBIOLOGY

ECOLOGY & APPLICATIONS


Third Edition

Colin B. Munn
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742

© 2020 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC


CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business

No claim to original U.S. Government works

Printed on acid-free paper

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-367-18356-1 (Paperback)


International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-367-18359-2 (Hardback)

This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been
made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the
validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the
copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to
publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let
us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.

Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted,
or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, includ­
ing photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written
permission from the publishers.

For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com
(http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers,
MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety
of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment
has been arranged.

Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation without intent to infringe.

Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at


http://www.taylorandfrancis.com

and the CRC Press Web site at


http://www.crcpress.com
Contents

Chapter 1 Microbes in the Marine Microbes in sea ice form an important part of the food
web in polar regions 22
Environment 1 Microbial activity underpins productive food webs in
ORIGINS AND SCOPE OF MARINE coral reefs 25
MICROBIOLOGY 2 Living organisms are the habitats of many microbes 25
Conclusions 25
Marine microbiology has developed into one of the most References and further reading 26
important areas of modern science 2
Microbes include microscopic cellular organisms and
non-cellular viruses 2 Chapter 2 Methods in Marine
Marine microorganisms are found in all three domains of Microbiology 29
cellular life 3
Horizontal gene transfer confounds our understanding of SAMPLING METHODS 30
evolution 4 Sampling the marine environment requires special
Viruses are non-cellular entities with great importance in techniques 30
marine ecosystems 4
Microbial processes shape the living world 5 IMAGING TECHNIQUES 32
Marine microbes show great variation in size 5 Light and electron microscopy are used to study
OCEAN HABITATS 6 morphology and structure of microbes 32
Epifluorescence light microscopy enables enumeration
The world’s oceans and seas form an interconnected of marine microbes 33
water system 6 Confocal laser scanning microscopy enables recognition
The upper surface of the ocean is in constant motion of living microbes within their habitat 35
owing to winds 8 Flow cytometry measures the number and
Deep-water circulation systems transport water between size of particles 35
the ocean basins 8 Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) allows
Light and temperature have important effects on visualization and quantification of specific microbes 36
microbial processes 9
Microbes occur in all the varied habitats found in CULTIVATION OF MICROORGANISMS 38
the oceans 10 Different microorganisms require specific culture media
Seawater is a complex mixture of inorganic and organic and conditions for growth 38
compounds, colloids, and gels 10 Enrichment culture selects for microbes with specific
The sea surface is covered by a gelatinous biofilm 14 growth requirements 40
SEDIMENTS AND SURFACES 14 Phenotypic testing is used for characterization of many
cultured bacteria 40
Microbes play a major role in marine sediments 14 Analysis of microbial cell components can be used for
Deep marine sediments contain a vast reservoir of bacterial classification and identification 42
ancient microbes 16
Microbes colonize surfaces through formation of METHODS BASED ON DNA AND RNA ANALYSIS 42
biofilms and mats 16 Nucleic acid-based methods have transformed
SOME EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL HABITATS—THE understanding of marine microbial diversity
DEEP SEA, POLAR OCEANS, CORAL REEFS, AND and ecology 42
LIVING ORGANISMS 19 Amplification and sequencing of ribosomal RNA
genes is widely used in microbial systematics and
Microbial activity at hydrothermal vents fuels an oasis diversity studies 42
of life in the deep sea 19 Isolation of genomic DNA or RNA is the first step in all
Cold seeps also support diverse life based on nucleic acid-based investigations 45
chemosynthesis 21 The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) forms the basis of
Microbes inhabit the interface of brine pools in the deep sea 21 many techniques 45
vi CONTENTS

Genomic fingerprinting can be used to assess diversity


SOURCES OF ENERGY AND CARBON 73

of cultured isolates 47

Microbes obtain energy from light or oxidation of


Determination of DNA properties is used in bacterial

compounds 73

and archaeal taxonomy 48

Microbes differ in their source of carbon to make

DNA sequence data are used for identification and

cellular material 74

phylogenetic analysis 48

DGGE and TRFLP can be used to assess composition


PHOTOTROPHY AND CHEMOTROPHY 74

of microbial communities 49
Phototrophy involves conversion of light energy to
Advances in DNA sequencing enable improved microbial
chemical energy 74

community analysis 50
Oxygenic photosynthesis involves two distinct but

Elucidating the full genome sequence of microbes


coupled photosystems 76

provides insights into their functional roles 52


Anaerobic anoxygenic photosynthesis uses only one

Metabarcoding and metagenomics have led to major


type of reaction center 76

advances in microbial community analysis 53


Aerobic anoxygenic phototrophy is widespread in

Omics technologies provide information about the


planktonic bacteria 77

functional gene composition of a microbial community 55


Some phototrophs use rhodopsins as light-harvesting

Genomes can now be obtained from single cells in


pigments 77

environmental samples 56
Chemolithotrophs use inorganic electron donors as

IN SITU ACTIVITY OF MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES 57


a source of energy and reducing power 79

Many bacteria oxidize sulfur compounds 80

Microelectrodes and biosensors measure microbial

Many chemolithotrophs use hydrogen as an

processes at the microhabitat scale 57

electron donor 81

Radioisotopes can be used to detect metabolic activity

Bacterial and archaeal nitrification is a major process

in a community 57

in the marine nitrogen cycle 81

Stable-isotope probing (SIP) tracks fluxes of nutrients in

Ammonia can also support anaerobic

communities 58

chemolithoautotrophy 82

NanoSIMS allows metabolic transfers to be measured at

subcellular levels 58
CARBON AND NITROGEN FIXATION 83

Microarrays enable assessment of gene activity in the


The Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle is the main
environment 59
method of carbon fixation in autotrophs 83

Metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics, and metabolomics


Some Archaea and Bacteria use alternative pathways

reveal microbial activities in the environment 59


to fix CO2 83

Microfluidics enables study of microscale processes 60


Fixation of nitrogen makes this essential element

Mesocosm experiments attempt to simulate natural


available for building cellular material in all life 84

conditions 60

Remote sensing permits global analysis of microbial


HETEROTROPHIC METABOLISM 85

activities 61
Many marine microbes obtain energy by the
Conclusions 62
fermentation of organic compounds 85

References and further reading 62


Anaerobic respiration has major importance in marine

processes 86

Chapter 3 Metabolic Diversity and


Nitrate reduction and denitrification release nitrogen and

other gases 86

Ecophysiology 65
Sulfate reduction is a major process in marine sediments 86

A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF CELL STRUCTURE AND


MICROBIAL PRODUCTION AND OXIDATION OF

FUNCTION 66
METHANE 87

Bacteria and archaea show a variety of cell forms and


Methanogenesis is unique to the Archaea 87

structural features 66
Methane is produced in the surface ocean by bacterial

The cytoplasmic membrane controls cell processes via


cleavage of phosphonates 88

transport of ions and molecules 66


Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) in sediments is

Cells may contain organelles, microcompartments, and


coupled to sulfate reduction 88

inclusion bodies 67
Many marine microbes oxidize methane and other C1

The nature of the cell envelope has a major effect on


compounds 90

physiology 68
NUTRIENT ACQUISITION AND MICROBIAL

Genome size and organization determines bacterial and


GROWTH 90

archaeal lifestyles 69

Microbes use a variety of mechanisms to regulate


Microbial metabolism depends on nutrient uptake 90

cellular activities 73

CONTENTS vii

Acquisition of iron is a major challenge for marine The order Caulobacterales contains prosthecate bacteria 121

microbes 92
Several alphaproteobacterial genera show magnetotaxis 123

Marine bacterioplankton use two trophic strategies 92


Magnetotaxis is also found in other classes and phyla 124

Growth rate and turnover of organic material depend on


The order Betaproteobacteriales includes many

nutrient concentrations 93
rare OTUs 124

Copiotrophic marine bacteria may show rapid growth


The Gammaproteobacteria is a very large and

in culture 93
diverse class 124

Bacteria adapt to starvation by coordinated changes to


The Gammaproteobacteria includes many uncultivated

cell metabolism 94
species of sulfide-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) 126

Some bacteria enter a “viable but nonculturable” state


The family Vibrionaceae includes many important

in the environment 95
pathogens and symbionts 127

Many bacteria use motility to search for nutrients and


Members of the order Oceanospirillales break down

optimal conditions 95
complex organic compounds 127

Flagella also have a mechanosensory function 97


The family Thiotrichaceae includes some

Microbes also respond to light, magnetic fields, and


important SOB 128

other stimuli 100


The proposed phylum Desulfobacterota contains

Gliding and twitching motility occur on surfaces 100


anaerobic sulfate- or sulfur-reducing bacteria (SRB) 129

Microbes colonize surfaces via formation of biofilms 101


The proposed phylum Epsilonbactereota contains major

Pili are important for bacterial attachment to surfaces


contributors to productivity at hydrothermal vents 129

and genetic exchange 102


Myxobacteria have a complex life cycle 132

Antagonistic interactions between microbes occur on


The Bdellovibrionales contains predatory bacteria 132

particles or surfaces 102


Members of the Zetaproteobacteria are microaerophilic

Quorum sensing is an intercellular communication


iron-oxidizers 133

system for regulation of gene expression 102


Members of the Cyanobacteria carry out oxygenic

PHYSICAL EFFECTS ON MICROBIAL GROWTH


photosynthesis 133

A genome-based classification of the Cyanobacteria is

AND SURVIVAL 105

under development 134

Most marine microbes grow at low temperatures 105


Prochlorococcus is the most abundant photosynthetic

Microbes growing in hydrothermal systems are


organism 134

adapted to very high temperatures 105


Synechococcus spp. dominate the upper photic zone 136

Microbes that inhabit the deep ocean must withstand


Some free-living and symbiotic cyanobacteria

a very high hydrostatic pressure 106


fix nitrogen 136

Ultraviolet irradiation has lethal and mutagenic effects 107


Filamentous cyanobacteria are important in the

Bacterial bioluminescence may protect bacteria from


formation of microbial mats 139

ROS and UV damage 108


Members of the Planctomycetes have atypical cell

Microbes use various mechanisms to prevent


structure 139

osmotic damage 108


The phylum Bacteroidetes has a major role in nutrient

Conclusions 109
cycling via degradation of polymers 140

References and further reading 109


Members of the phylum Chloroflexi are widespread but

poorly characterized 141

Chapter 4 Diversity of Marine


The phyla Aquificae and Thermotogae are deeply

Bacteria 113
branching primitive thermophiles 141

The Firmicutes are a major branch of Gram-

OVERVIEW OF BACTERIAL DIVERSITY 114


positive Bacteria 142

Members of the Actinobacteria are a rich source of

Understanding of diversity has been revolutionized by secondary metabolites, including antibiotics 143

phylogenetic and genomic techniques 114


Conclusions 144

Bacterial systematics is in transition due to application


References and further reading 144

of genomic methods 115

OTUs and ASVs are used to represent diversity in

community analyses 118


Chapter 5 Marine Archaea 149

Marine microbial communities show high alpha


Several aspects of cell structure and function
diversity 119
distinguish the Archaea and Bacteria 150

A TOUR OF THE BACTERIAL AQUARIUM 120


New phylogenomic methods have led to recognition of

multiple phyla of the Archaea 150

The Proteobacteria account for about half of all


bacterial ocean diversity 121
PHYLUM EURYARCHAEOTA 151

Members of the class Alphaproteobacteria are the most


Many members of the Euryarchaeota produce methane 151

abundant marine bacteria 121

viii CONTENTS

Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) in sediments is Photosynthetic prasinophytes are abundant members
carried out by syntrophic archaea 153 of the picoplankton 184
The class Thermococci contains hyperthermophiles Amoebozoa are important grazers of particle-
found at hydrothermal vents 154 associated bacteria 184
Archaeoglobus and Ferroglobus are hyperthermophilic Radiolarians and foraminifera have highly diverse
sulfate-reducers and iron-oxidizers 155 morphologies with mineral shells 185
The Euryarchaeota contains extreme halophiles 155 MARINE FUNGI 186
Uncultivated members of the Euryarchaeota are
abundant in the plankton 155 The Fungi form a distinct monophyletic group on a
branch within the Nucletmycea 186
PHYLUM CRENARCHAEOTA 156
Fungi are increasingly recognized to be major
Members of the Crenarchaeota are thermophiles components of the marine microbiome 187
occurring in hydrothermal vents 156 Conclusions 189
PHYLUM THAUMARCHAEOTA 157 References and further reading 192

A single clade of ammonia-oxidizing archaea


comprises 20% of the picoplankton 157 Chapter 7 Marine Viruses 195
PHYLUM NANOARCHAEOTA 161 Viruses are highly diverse non-cellular microbes 196
Phages are viruses that infect bacterial and
Nanoarchaeum is an obligate parasite of another archaeal cells 200
archaeon 161 The life cycle of phages shows a number of
Conclusions 162 distinct stages 201
References and further reading 162 Lysogeny occurs when the phage genome is integrated
into the host genome 201
Chapter 6 Marine Eukaryotic Loss of viral infectivity arises from damage to the
nucleic acid or capsid 205
Microbes 165 Measurement of virus production rates is important for
quantifying virus-induced mortality 205
MARINE PROTISTS 166
Viral mortality “lubricates” the biological pump 206
Protists are a highly diverse collection of unicellular Nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDVs) are
eukaryotic microbes 166 important pathogens of microalgae and other protists 206
Protists show enormous diversity and classification Other giant viruses are abundant pathogens of
systems are regularly revised 167 heterotrophic protists 210
The -omics approaches have some limitations for RNA viruses also infect protists 211
understanding protist diversity 168 Viral mortality plays a major role in structuring
Picoeukaryotes play a major role in ocean food webs 169 diversity of microbial communities 212
Heterotrophic flagellated protists play a major role in Marine viruses show enormous genetic diversity 214
grazing of other microbes 169 Viromes are creators of genetic diversity and exchange 215
Heterotrophic flagellated protists have different feeding Conclusions 215
mechanisms 170 References and further reading 215
Many protists are mixotrophic 172
The choanoflagellates have a unique morphology
Chapter 8 Microbes in Ocean
and feeding mechanism 172
Dinoflagellates have several critical roles in Processes—Carbon Cycling 219
marine systems 173 Physical factors and biotic processes determine the
Dinoflagellates and other protists undertake diel fate of carbon in the oceans 221
vertical migration 175 Marine phytoplankton are responsible for about half
Some dinoflagellates exhibit bioluminescence 176 of the global primary production 222
The ciliates are voracious grazers of other protists There are wide geographical and seasonal variations in
and bacteria 177 primary production 224
The haptophytes (prymnesiophytes) are some of the Dark ocean carbon fixation makes a major contribution
most abundant components of ocean phytoplankton 178 to primary production 226
Diatoms are extremely diverse and abundant primary Classic food chain and microbial loop processes occur
producers in the oceans 181 in the epipelagic 226
Other stramenopiles may cause harmful blooms 183 The microbial loop results in retention of dissolved
Thraustochytrids and labyrinthulids are active nutrients 227
degraders of organic matter 183 The biological pump transports fixed carbon to the
deep ocean and sediments 228
CONTENTS ix

Carbon export of primary production may change due THE SILICON CYCLE 253
to ocean warming and acidification 228
Silicification of diatoms is an economic process for
Ingestion of bacteria by protists plays a key role in the
construction of a cell wall 253
microbial loop 229
Diatom blooms depend on the availability of silica
The viral shunt catalyzes nutrient regeneration in the
in the environment 254
upper ocean 230
Eutrophication alters the silicon balance in
Microbial processes alter the composition of DOM 231
coastal zones 254
Eutrophication of coastal waters stimulates
Conclusions 255
microbial activity 232
References and further reading 255
Conclusions 233
References and further reading 233
Chapter 10 Microbial Symbioses of
Chapter 9 Microbes in Ocean Marine Animals 259
Processes—Nitrogen, Sulfur, Iron, Symbioses occur in many forms 260
Phosphorus, and Silicon Cycling 235 Chemosynthetic bacterial endosymbionts of animals
were discovered at hydrothermal vents 260
NUTRIENT LIMITATION 236 A wide range of other chemosynthetic endosymbioses
occurs in the deep sea 264
Key elements act as limiting nutrients for Chemosynthetic symbioses are also widespread in
phytoplankton 236 shallow-water sediments 266
Productivity of surface waters shows marked Animals colonizing whale falls depend on autotrophic
geographical variations 236 and heterotrophic symbionts 269
Ocean microbes require iron 237 Sea squirts harbor photosynthetic bacteria 269
Terrestrial runoff, dust, and volcanic ash are major Endosymbionts of bryozoans produce compounds that
sources of iron input 237 protect the host from predation 270
Hydrothermal vents and glacial melting also supply Sponges contain dense communities of specific microbes 273
iron to the oceans 238 Many marine invertebrates depend on photosynthetic
Whales and seabirds play a major role in supply of endosymbionts 275
iron to phytoplankton 241 Zooxanthellae (Symbiodiniaceae) show extensive
THE NITROGEN CYCLE 241 genetic diversity and host specificity 275
Many corals are dependent on zooxanthellae for nutrition 276
There have been major shifts in our understanding
Coral bleaching occurs when the host–symbiont
of the marine nitrogen cycle 241
interactions are uncoupled 278
Diazotrophs incorporate atmospheric nitrogen into
The coral holobiont contains multiple microbial partners 280
organic material 241
Zooxanthellae boost the growth of giant clams 281
Fixed nitrogen is returned to the inorganic pool by
Some fish and invertebrates employ symbiotic bacteria
ammonification and nitrification 243
to make light 284
Assimilation of ammonium and nitrate fuels growth
The bobtail squid uses bacterial bioluminescence for
of phytoplankton and other microbes 244
camouflage 286
Nitrate reduction, denitrification, and anammox reactions
Conclusions 287
return nitrogen to its elemental form and other gases 244
References and further reading 288
Diverse microbial metabolic processes occur in oxygen
minimum zones (OMZs) 245
Microbial processes in sediments are a major Chapter 11 Microbial Diseases of
contributor to nitrogen cycling 247 Marine Organisms 291
THE SULFUR CYCLE 247 Diseases of marine organisms have major ecological
The oceans and sediments contain large quantities and economic impact 292
of sulfur compounds 247 DISEASES OF CORALS, SPONGES,

Metabolism of organic sulfur compounds is especially AND ECHINODERMS 292

important in surface waters 248


DMSP production leads to release of the climate-active Infectious diseases threaten the survival of corals 292
gas dimethyl sulfide (DMS) 248 Vibrios are associated with many coral diseases 293
The fungus Aspergillus sydowii caused mass mortality
THE PHOSPHORUS CYCLE 252 of sea fans in the Caribbean Sea 295
Phosphorus is often a limiting or co-limiting nutrient 252 Black band disease of corals is a disease of corals
Marine microbes are adapted to low and variable worldwide 295
levels of phosphorus 252
x CONTENTS

White plague and white pox are major diseases DISEASES OF MAMMALS 320
affecting Caribbean reefs 298
Dinoflagellate and diatom toxins affect
Protistan parasites may cause tissue necrosis and
marine mammals 320
skeletal erosion 299
Virus disease cause mass mortalities in cetaceans and
Viruses have a pivotal role in coral health 300
pinnipeds 321
Sponge disease is a poorly investigated global
Viruses from nine different families have been linked
phenomenon 301
to diseases of marine mammals 321
Mass mortalities of echinoderms have caused major
Several species of bacteria and fungi infect marine
shifts in reef and coastal ecology 303
mammals 323
DISEASES OF MOLLUSCS 304
DISEASES OF SEA TURTLES 323
Bacteria are a major cause of disease in molluscs 304
Sea turtles are affected by a virus promoting growth
Several protistan diseases affect culture of oysters
of tumors 323
and mussels 305
Virus infections are a major problem in oyster culture 306 DISEASES OF SEAGRASSES AND SEAWEEDS 324
DISEASES OF CRUSTACEANS 306 Heterokont protists cause ecologically important
mortality of seagrasses 324
Bacteria cause epizootics with high mortalities in
Bacteria, fungi, and viruses infect marine macroalgae 324
crustaceans 306
Conclusions 326
Expansion of crustacean aquaculture is threatened by
References and further reading 326
viral diseases 307
Parasitic dinoflagellates also cause
disease in crustaceans 309 Chapter 12 Marine Microbes as
DISEASES OF FISH 309 Agents of Human Disease 331
Microbial diseases of fish cause major losses in
MICROBIAL INFECTIONS 332
aquaculture and natural populations 309
Microbial infections of fish cause a variety of Pathogenic vibrios are common in marine and
disease signs 310 estuarine environments 332
Fish-pathogenic bacteria possess a range of virulence Vibrio cholerae is an autochthonous aquatic bacterium 332
mechanisms 311 Complex regulatory networks control human
Vibrios are responsible for some of the main infections colonization and virulence of V. cholerae 333
of marine fish 311 Mobile genetic elements play a major role in the
Pasteurellosis affects warm-water marine fish 313 biology of Vibrio spp. 333
Aeromonas salmonicida has a broad geographic range Non-O1 and non-O139 serotypes of Vibrio cholerae are
affecting fish in fresh and marine waters 314 widely distributed in coastal and estuarine waters 335
Marine flexibacteriosis is caused by a weakly virulent Vibrio vulnificus is a deadly opportunistic pathogen 337
opportunist pathogen 315 Pathogenicity of V. vulnificus is due to the interaction
Piscirickettsia and Francisella are intracellular of multiple gene products 338
proteobacteria infecting salmon and cod 316 Environmental factors affect the pathogenicity of
Intracellular Gram-positive bacteria cause chronic V. vulnificus 338
infections of fish 316 Vibrio parahaemolyticus is the leading cause of
Some Gram-positive cocci affect the central nervous seafood-associated gastroenteritis 339
system of fish 317 Microbes associated with fish and marine mammals
Viruses cause numerous diseases of marine fish 318 can be transmitted to humans 340
Infectious salmon anemia (ISA) is one of the most DISEASES CAUSED BY MARINE MICROBIAL
serious diseases in salmon culture 318 TOXINS 341
Viral hemorrhagic septicemia (VHS) virus infects many
species of wild fish 318 Scombroid fish poisoning results from bacterial
Lymphocystis virus causes chronic skin infection of fish 319 enzyme activity 341
Birnaviruses appear to be widespread in marine fish Botulism is a rare lethal intoxication from seafood 341
and invertebrates 319 Fugu poisoning is caused by a neurotoxin of
Viral nervous necrosis (VNN) is an emerging disease bacterial origin 342
with major impact 319 TTX is widespread amongst marine animals 343
Protists cause disease in fish via infections, toxins, Some dinoflagellates and diatoms produce harmful
and direct physical effects 319 toxins 343
CONTENTS xi

Paralytic shellfish poisoning is caused by saxitoxins Shellfish from sewage-polluted waters can cause
produced by dinoflagellates 344 human infection 369
Brevetoxin causes illness via ingestion or inhalation Microbiological standards are used for classification of
during red tides 346 shellfish production areas 370
Dinophysiotoxins and azaspiracid toxins from shellfish Direct testing for pathogens in shellfish is possible with
result in gastrointestinal symptoms 346 molecular methods 371
Amnesic shellfish poisoning is caused by toxic diatoms 347 OIL AND OTHER CHEMICAL POLLUTION 372
Ciguatera fish poisoning has a major impact on the
health of tropical islanders 347 Oil pollution of the marine environment is a
Bacteria influence the production of HAB toxins 349 major problem 372
Dinoflagellate and diatom toxins may be antipredator Microbes naturally degrade oil in the sea 372
defense mechanisms 349 Physical and biological processes affect the fate
Complex factors affect the incidence of HABs and of oil spills 373
toxin-associated diseases 350 Bioremediation of oil spills may be enhanced by
Coastal waters must be regularly monitored to assess emulsifiers and nutrients 373
the development of HABs 351 Microbes can detoxify heavy metals from contaminated
Conclusions 351 sediments 376
References and further reading 352 Microbial systems can be used for
ecotoxicological testing 377
Microbial adsorption and metabolism affect
Chapter 13 Microbial Aspects of accumulation of mercury 377
Marine Biofouling, Biodeterioration, Microbial cycling is important in the distribution of
persistent organic pollutants 377
and Pollution 355 Plastic pollution of the oceans is a major global problem 378
Conclusions 379
BIOFOULING AND BIODETERIORATION 356 References and further reading 382
Microbial biofilms initiate the process of biofouling 356
Microbes induce corrosion of metals, alloys, and
composite materials 357
Chapter 14 Marine Microbial
Microbes cause biodeterioration of timber and marine Biotechnology 387
wooden structures 358 Enzymes From Marine Microbes Have Many
Microbial growth and metabolism cause spoilage of Applications 388
seafood products 359 DNA polymerases from hydrothermal vent organisms
Processing, packaging, and inhibitors of spoilage are are widely used in molecular biology 390
used to extend shelf-life 360 Metagenomics and bioinformatics lead to new
Some seafood products are made by deliberate biotechnological developments 390
manipulation of microbial activities 361 Polymers from marine bacteria have many applications 391
MARINE POLLUTION BY SEWAGE AND Microalgae can produce biofuels and edible oils 391
WASTEWATER 361 Marine microbes are a rich source of biomedical
products393
Coastal pollution by wastewater is a source of
Many bioactive compounds from marine invertebrates are
human disease 361
produced by microbes 393
Human viral pathogens occur in sewage-
With so much potential from the sea, why are there so
polluted seawater 362
few new drugs? 395
Fecal indicator organisms (FIOs) are used to assess
Study of complex microbial communities may lead to
public health risks 363
new antibiotics 395
Coliforms and E. coli are unreliable FIOs for seawater
Marine microbes provide various health-
monitoring 363
promoting products 396
Enterococci are more reliable FIOs for seawater
Marine microbes have applications in biomimetics,
monitoring 364
nanotechnology, and bioelectronics 396
Molecular-based methods permit quicker analysis of
Microbial biotechnology has many applications in
indicator organisms and microbial source tracking 365
aquaculture 397
Various alternative indicator species have been
Antimicrobial agents are widely used in aquaculture 397
investigated 366
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major problem in
Countries have different quality standards for
aquaculture 399
bathing waters 367
Vaccination of finfish is widely used in aquaculture 400
xii CONTENTS

Recombinant DNA technology is used to produce Conclusions 405


vaccines for diseases caused by viruses and References and further reading 406
some bacteria 401
Live attenuated vaccines are effective but not
widely used 402 Chapter 15 Concluding Remarks 409
DNA vaccination depends on fish cells expressing a
protective antigen 402
Probiotics, prebiotics, and immunostimulants are
widely used in aquaculture 403 Index 411
List of Research Focus Boxes

1.1 Deep subsurface microbes—are they dead,


9.1 Can artificial fertilization of the oceans with iron

dormant, or just staying alive?


help to mitigate global warming?

1.2 What will happen when the sea-ice melts?


9.2 Transformations of DMSP are major drivers of

diverse ocean processes

2.1 Cultivating the uncultured

10.1 Genomic insights into host–symbiont

3.1 Microbes use solar power to top up energy levels

interactions: infection, colonization, and dissemination

3.2 How can microscale bacterial swimming affect

10.2 Chemosynthetic bacteria fuel ecosystem-

global processes?

engineering bivalves

4.1 High-throughput DNA sequencing provides new

10.3 Do corals have a core microbiome?

insights into marine microbial diversity

10.4 Genomic insights into the evolution of

4.2 Cable bacteria unite to conduct electricity

bioluminescent symbionts of fish

5.1 Evolution of an evolutionary pathway—changing

11.1 The pathogenicity of Vibrio coralliilyticus

views of Archaea in the tree of life

11.2 Caribbean corals under threat from a new

5.2 Deep-sea FISHing—discovery of the role of

disease syndrome

archaea in carbon and nitrogen cycling

12.1 Are human Vibrio infections a microbial

6.1 Sailing towards a better understanding of

barometer for climate change?

heterotrophic ocean protists

13.1 Is it safe to swim? The health effects of

6.2 Exciting times for marine mycology

recreational exposure to seawater

7.1 Models for the co-evolution of bacteria and their phages

13.2 How microbes cleaned up deep-sea oil after the

7.2 “Bloom and bust”—the life cycle of Emiliania


Deepwater Horizon (DWH) disaster

huxleyi and Coccolithovirus (EhV)


13.3 Microorganisms and microplastics

7.3 New ideas about the nature and evolution of viruses

14.1 “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”—phage

8.1 The role of microbes in the ocean carbon cycle


therapy for marine diseases

Preface

In the Foreword to the Second Edition of this textbook published in 2011, Farooq Azam,
Distinguished Professor of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, wrote:

When we think of the ocean we might think of whales, waves, dolphins, fish, the smell of
the sea, its blue color, and its vastness; most of us would not look out at the sea and think
of marine microbes, nor did marine scientists for over a century. They sailed the seas and
strenuously dragged plankton nets through the ocean’s pelagic zone to capture what they
judged would represent the marine biota. But they were unaware that the great majority of
the biota, perhaps 99 percent, easily streamed through the holes of their nets; the holes were
simply too big to capture these microbes. Even when membrane filters and microscopy
were used, and they revealed great diversity of microplankton and nanoplankton, most
microbes evaded detection. The view of the pelagic web of life that emerged, and became
entrenched for a century, was then based on a tiny fraction of marine biota. As a result, fish­
eries scientists used models that did not include marine microbes, as did marine chemists
and geochemists who studied how biological forces influenced the grand cycles of elements
in the ocean. Much had to be revised as the major roles of the microbes were discovered,
following the development of new concepts, incisive imaging, and molecular methods to
observe and study marine plankton.

In this Third Edition, it will become clear that astonishing advances in marine microbiology
have continued to propel the discipline to be one of the most important areas of modern sci­
ence. I hope that readers will share a sense of my excitement of learning about new discover­
ies in this fascinating and fast-moving subject.

This book is intended primarily for upper-level undergraduates and graduate students, but
I anticipate that it will also prove useful to researchers who are interested in some of the
broader aspects and applications outside of their specific area of investigation. University
courses often include some element of microbiology as a specialist option for oceanography
or marine biology majors who have little previous knowledge of microbiology, but marine
microbiology is lightly covered in most textbooks. I hope that this book may play some part
in rectifying this deficiency. I also hope that the book will be useful to microbiology majors
studying courses in environmental microbiology, who may have little knowledge about ocean
processes or the applications of the study of marine microorganisms. I have attempted to
make the book sufficiently self-contained to satisfy all of the various potential audiences.
Above all, I wanted to create a book that is enjoyable to read, with the overall aim of bring­
ing together an understanding of microbial biology and ecology with consideration of the
applications for environmental management, human welfare, health, and economic activity.

As will become evident, many common themes and recurring concepts link the activities,
diversity, ecology, and applications of marine microbes. In each chapter, I have attempted to
summarize the current state of knowledge about each aspect, with extensive cross-linking to
other sections. To improve readability, I rarely cite specific references in the main text, but
each chapter contains special interest boxes, which contain references to recent research.
Short boxes marked with the symbols or highlight important questions or interest­
ing facts that supplement the main text. The choice of these topics is entirely my personal
whim—they represent subjects that I think are particularly intriguing, exciting, controver­
sial, or sometimes fun. Each chapter contains one to three Research Focus Boxes—these are
intended to be relatively self-contained “mini-essays,” which explore in more detail some
hot topics of investigation. Examples include the impacts of rising CO2 levels on microbial
community structure and ocean processes, interactions of microbes with plastic pollution,
symbiotic interactions, and emerging diseases of marine life. They are not intended to be
exhaustive reviews, but I hope that they serve as a stimulus for students to follow up some of
the original research papers suggested and use these as a starting point for further inquiry or
xvi PREFACE

discussion in seminars. The reference list for each chapter contain numerous suggestions for
further reading.

The great advances in marine microbiology have occurred because of the development and
application of innovative new techniques. Therefore, an understanding of the main principles
of these methods is essential if the student is to make sense of research findings. Chapter 2
is written in a style that concentrates on the principles and avoids too much technical detail,
so I implore you to read this chapter right through at an early stage to gain an overview of
methods, referring back whenever a particular technique is mentioned later.

What’s new in this edition? The general aims and structure of the book are similar, but all
material has been updated and most sections have been completely rewritten and expanded to
take account of the many new discoveries in this field since the second edition was published
in 2011, especially the astonishing advances due to extensive application of high-through­
put sequencing, single cell genomics, and analysis of large datasets. Significant advances in
understanding the diversity and evolution of bacteria, archaea, fungi, protists, and viruses
are discussed and their importance in marine processes is explored in detail. There are many
new color diagrams, illustrations, and boxes to aid students’ interest and understanding. I
have also tried to incorporate the numerous helpful comments received from students, course
leaders, and reviewers about previous editions and early drafts of this one. In addition, the
book has a companion website, which provides additional online resources for instructors
and students, including a summary of key concepts and terminology for each chapter, links
to further resources, artwork, videos, and more. My personal blog at www.marinemicro.org
also contains news and longer research articles.

Despite an exhaustive review process, astute readers will undoubtedly spot some errors and
omissions, or have suggestions for improvement. I welcome your comments—please e-mail
me at [email protected] or via the publishers.
Acknowledgments

This book would not have been possible without the continued stimulation of ideas through
teaching my university courses and mentoring research students. It has been a source of
immense pleasure and pride to see my efforts come full circle through the authoritative input
of several of my former students who have gone on to establish successful research careers
in marine microbiology. I am indebted to them and to the many other scientific colleagues
listed below, who gave up their time to comment on the original proposal, review drafts, and
provide valuable suggestions to improve the text. I also thank all those colleagues who pro­
vided images, especially Davis Laundon for his spectacular cover design. I am particularly
grateful to Alice Oven, Senior Editor at CRC Press, for her enthusiasm and encouragement
to produce a Third Edition and for developing the new improved design for the book. I also
thank Sadé Lee, Damanpreet Kaur, Andrew Corrigan, and other members of the editorial
and design team at CRC Press for their expertise and help. Finally, to Sheila—thank you for
your constant love, support, and patience during this venture.

Colin B. Munn,

Marine Institute,

University of Plymouth, UK.

Reviewers
Mike Allen, University of Exeter and Plymouth Marine Laboratory; Rudolf Amann, Max
Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology; Craig Baker-Austin, CEFAS Laboratory; David
Bourne, AIMS and James Cook University; Mya Breitbart, University of South Florida;
Craig Carlson, University of California, Santa Barbara; Ian Cooper, University of Brighton;
Michael Cunliffe, Marine Biological Association of the UK; Jesse Dillon, California
State University, Long Beach; Stuart Donachie, University of Hawaii, Manoa; Alexander
Gruhl, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology; Marcelo Gutiérrez, Universidad de
Concepción, Chile; Oliver Jäckle, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology; Christina
Kellogg, US Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center; Anne
Leonard, University of Exeter; Davis Laundon; Marine Biological Association of the UK;
Sophie Leterme, Flinders University; Lauren Messer, University of Queensland; Jozef
Nissimov, Scottish Association for Marine Science; Mircea Podar, Oak Ridge National
Laboratory; Elizabeth Robertson, Gothenburg University; Emma Ransome, Imperial
College London; Greta Reintjes, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology; Wolfgang
Sand, University of Duisberg-Essen; Val Smith, University of St Andrews; Victor Smetacek,
Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research; Roman Stocker,
Environmental Microfluidics Group, ETH Zürich; Ben Temperton, Exeter University;
Jack Thomson, University of Liverpool; Malin Tietjen, Max Planck Institute for Marine
Microbiology; Richard Thompson, University of Plymouth; Rebecca Vega-Thurber, Oregon
State University; Jack Wang, University of Queensland; Joanna Warwick-Dugdale, Plymouth
Marine Laboratory and University of Exeter; Robyn Wright, University of Warwick; Willie
Wilson, Marine Biological Association of the UK; Erik Zettler, NIOZ Royal Netherlands
Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University; Xiao-Hua Zhang, Ocean University of
China.
Chapter 1
Microbes in the
Marine Environment

Viewed from space, it is clear why our planet would be better named “Ocean” than “Earth.”
More than 70% of the planet’s surface is covered by interconnected bodies of water. Life
originated in the oceans about 3.5 billion years ago and microbes were the only form of life
for two-thirds of the planet’s existence. The development and maintenance of all other forms
of life depend absolutely on the past and present activities of marine microbes. Yet the vast
majority of humans—including many marine scientists—live their lives completely unaware
of the diversity and importance of marine microbes. Such understanding is vital, as we now
live in a period of rapid global change. This chapter introduces the scope of marine microbi-
ology, the different types of marine microbe (viruses, bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protists),
and their place in the living world. The activities of microbes in the many diverse habitats
found in the marine environment are introduced to provide the background for more detailed
consideration in later chapters.

Key Concepts
• Modern methods have led to new ideas about the diversity and evolution of microbial
life.
• Marine microbes are highly diverse and exist in huge numbers, forming a major com-
ponent of biomass on Earth.
• The most abundant marine microbes are exceptionally small.
• The oceans provide diverse specialized habitats, in which physical and chemical con-
ditions determine microbial activities.
• Planktonic microbes are responsible for primary productivity and recycling of organic
compounds in a continuum of dissolved and particulate matter.
• Microbes are important in the formation and fate of sediments and there is abundant
life below the seafloor.
• Microbes colonize the surfaces of inanimate objects and other living organisms by the
formation of biofilms and microbial mats.
2 Chapter 1

ORIGINS AND SCOPE OF MARINE MICROBIOLOGY


Marine microbiology has developed into one of
the most important areas of modern science
Ever since a detailed study of the microbial world began in the late nineteenth century, scien­
tists have asked questions about the diversity of microbial life in the sea, its role in ocean pro­
cesses, its interactions with other marine life, and its importance to humans. However, despite
excellent work by pioneering scientists, progress in understanding accumulated gradually and
some aspects were poorly understood until recently. However, toward the end of the twentieth
century, several factors conspired to propel marine microbiology to the forefront of “main­
stream” science. The involvement of more investigators and the subsequent application of new
technology mean that it is now one of the most exciting and fast-moving areas of investigation.
Today, our subject is characterized by multidisciplinary investigations and widespread appli­
cation of powerful new tools in molecular biology, information technology, remote sensing,
and deep-sea exploration, leading to astonishing discoveries of the abundance, diversity, and
interactions of marine microbial life and its role in global ecology. These continuing new dis­
coveries necessitate radical rethinking of our understanding of ocean processes. We now real­
ize the vital role that marine microbes play in the maintenance of our planet, a fact that will
have great bearing on our ability to respond to problems such as the increase in human popula­
tion, overexploitation of fisheries, climate change, ocean acidification, and marine pollution.
Studies of the interactions of marine microbes with other organisms are providing intrigu­
ing insights into the phenomena of food webs, symbiosis, pathogenicity, and the important
role microbiomes play in metazoan biology. Since some marine microbes produce disease or
damage, we need to study these processes and develop ways to control them. Finally, marine
microbes have beneficial properties such as the manufacture of new drugs and materials, and
the development of new processes in the growing field of marine biotechnology. This chapter
sets the scene for the discussion of all these topics in this book.

Microbes include microscopic cellular


organisms and non-cellular viruses
Defining the terms “microbiology” and “microorganism” is surprisingly difficult!
Microbiology is the study of very small organisms that are too small to be seen clearly with
the naked eye (i.e. less than about 1 mm diameter), but most microbiologists are concerned
with the activities or molecular properties of microbial communities rather than viewing indi­
vidual cells with a microscope. The term “microorganism” simply refers to a form of life that
falls within the microscopic size range, but there is a huge spectrum of diversity concealed by
i TINY MICROBES…

HUGE NUMBERS
this all-encompassing term. Indeed, some “microorganisms” are large enough to see without
using a microscope, so this is not entirely satisfactory either. Some scientists would argue that
Whitman et al. (1998) estimated the distinguishing features of microorganisms are small size, unicellular organization, and
the total number of bacterial osmotrophy (feeding by absorption of nutrients). The osmotrophic characteristic is important
and archaeal cells in the oceans because diffusion processes are a major limitation to cell size, as discussed in the next sec­
to be about 1029. This figure was
tion. However, this characteristic would exclude many microscopic unicellular eukaryotes,
confirmed by Bar-On et al. (2018)
in a recent recalculation based on
many of which feed by phagotrophy (engulfment of particles). For many years, these micro­
analysis of many new datasets; organisms were studied by specialists who had a traditional background in botany or zoology
they also estimated the biomass and classified into “plant-like” (algae) or “animal-like” (protozoa) groups. However, many of
of marine bacteria and archaea these organisms are mixotrophic and can switch from photosynthesis to phagotrophic feed­
at 1.3 and 0.3 gigatons (Gt) of ing, so the “plant” or “animal” similarity is meaningless. This loose grouping of organisms
carbon, respectively. Suttle (2005) is therefore called “protists,” a diverse category encompassing most of the diversity within
calculated the number of viruses the domain Eukarya. Depending on their size (see below), they may also be referred to as
to be about 1030 —again, this was microeukaryotes or picoeukaryotes. The study of marine protists and recognition that they
confirmed by Bar-On et al. (2018). are microbes with a major role in ocean processes has lagged behind the study of bacteria
This is an unimaginably huge num­
until recently. Where do viruses fit? Viruses are obviously microscopic, so I consider them to
ber—1 million, million, million, mil­
be microbes. However, they are not cellular, so cannot be described as microorganisms and
lion, million. If all the marine virus
particles were placed end to end, many would argue that they are not living (this question is explored in depth in Chapter 7).
they would span about 10 million In summary, in this book I use the term “microbe” as a generic descriptor for microscopic
light years (100 times the distance cellular organisms including bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protists, together with the non­
across our own galaxy). cellular viruses.
Microbes in the Marine Environment 3

Marine microorganisms are found in all


three domains of cellular life
Biologists usually rely on the study of morphology and physiological properties to classify living
organisms, but these characteristics have always proved frustratingly unhelpful when dealing
with microbes. Modern methods of classification group organisms by attempting to determine
the evolutionary relationships. Such phylogenetic systems of classification depend on compari­
sons of the genetic information contained in their macromolecules, especially nucleic acids and
proteins. If two organisms are very closely related, we expect the sequence of the individual units
(nucleotides or amino acids) in a macromolecule to be more similar than they would be in two
unrelated organisms. In the 1970s, Carl Woese and colleagues pioneered the use of ribosomal
RNA (rRNA) sequencing in order to develop a better view of microbial diversity. Our view of the
living world has since been revolutionized by advances in this approach, made possible because
of the parallel advances in molecular biological techniques and computer processing of the large
amounts of information generated. Because the secondary structure of rRNA is so important in
the ribosome and the vital cell function of protein synthesis, base sequence changes in the rRNA
molecule occur quite slowly in evolution. In fact, some parts of rRNA are highly conserved and
sequence comparisons can be used to ascertain the similarity of organisms on a broad basis. The
methods and applications of this major technique are described in Chapter 2.

In 1990, Woese identified three distinct lineages of cellular life, referred to as the domains
Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya. A phylogenetic “tree of life” based on rRNA sequences
envisaged divergence of these three domains from an original “universal ancestor”
(Figure 1.1A). A phylogenetic approach to classification is now widely accepted, although
some biologists prefer other systems. Microbiologists like it because we can say that we study
two entire domains of life and a significant proportion of the third! Traditionally, members of
the domains Bacteria and Archaea have been grouped together as “the prokaryotes,” because
they share a simple internal cellular structure without a nucleus. However, the most impor­
tant consequence of the three-domain tree of life is that we now realize that the Bacteria and
Archaea are completely different phylogenetic groups. Archaea are not a peculiar, specialized

Figure 1.1 Representations of the


three domains of life. A. Simple
tree based on early interpretation
of ribosomal RNA sequencing. In
this model, the root of the tree is
envisaged as a hypothetical universal
ancestor from which all life evolved.
B. A three-domain tree based on
evidence of extensive lateral gene
transfer, revealed by studies of other
genes. (Drawn before discovery of
other archaeal branches; see Box 5.1).
C. An artistic representation of major
divisions of the tree of life by Hug
et al. (2016). The numerous known
groups of the Bacteria are shown on
the left, with the large group of cur-
rently uncultivable Bacteria termed
the Candidate Phyla Radiation at
upper right. The Archaea are shown
at the left of the lower branch, with
the Eukarya at the lower right. (See
Figure 4.1 for an updated detailed
version of the tree). Credits: B. Gary
J. Olsen, University of Illinois, based
on concept of W. Ford Doolittle. C.
Zosia Rostomian, Berkeley Lab.
4 Chapter 1

group of bacteria as originally thought (for many years they were called the archaebacteria)

?
TWO DOMAINS but are in fact a completely separate group that actually has closer phylogenetic relation­
OR THREE? ships to the Eukarya than to the Bacteria. This concept has proved to be very influential
There are many differences of in shaping our thinking about the evolution of organisms. As new methods and knowledge
opinion about the relationships about genomes has developed, the simple three-domain tree has changed, as illustrated in
between organisms, especially Figures 1.1B and 1.1C. These developments are discussed in detail in Chapters 4 and 5.
when we try to explain deep
evolutionary branches. Some The members of the Eukarya domain are the protists, fungi, plants, and animals. Their cells
authors believe that new evidence are distinguished by a membrane-bound nucleus and organelles with specific functions.
about the evolution of rRNA and
Mitochondria occur in all eukaryotic cells, with the exception of a few anaerobic protozoa, and
the use of new models to compute
phylogenetic trees calls the three-
carry out the processes of respiratory electron transport. In photosynthetic eukaryotes, chlo­
domain tree concept into ques­ roplasts carry out reactions for the transfer of light energy for cellular metabolism. Various
tion. Embley and Williams (2016) lines of evidence (especially the molecular analysis of the nucleic acids and proteins) support
argue that the discovery of new the “endosymbiosis theory” (originally developed by Lynn Margulis in the 1960s) that the
archaeal groups (see Chapter 5) organelles of eukaryotic cells have evolved by a process of endosymbiosis, in which one cell
supports the idea of a two-domain lives inside another cell for mutual benefit. This theory proposes that the original source of
“eocyte” tree to explain the origin mitochondria in eukaryotic cells occurred when primitive cells acquired respiratory bacteria
of the eukaryotes from within the (most closely related to proteobacteria) and that the chloroplasts evolved from endosymbiosis
Archaea. The “archaeal ances­ with cyanobacteria. Such interactions between different types of cell have continued through­
tor hypothesis” for the origin of
out evolution, and Chapter 10 contains many examples of endosymbiosis involving microbes.
eukaryotes is gaining acceptance,
although Forterre (2015) and Nasir
et al. (2016) provide alternative
explanations. Horizontal gene transfer confounds
our understanding of evolution
The use of rRNA sequences as a basis for phylogenetic classification has revolutionized
our understanding of microbial diversity and phylogeny. However, since advances in DNA
sequencing (see Chapter 2) made it possible to study the sequences of many other genes,
we have found increasing evidence of extensive horizontal gene transfer (HGT, also known
as lateral gene transfer, LGT) between microbes. Such transfers occur most commonly
between related organisms but transfers across bigger genetic distances also occur—even
between domains. Members of the Bacteria and Archaea contain some genes with very simi­
lar sequences, and members of the Eukarya contain genes from both of the other domains.
Some members of the domain Bacteria have even been shown to contain eukaryotic genes.
Previously, evolution was explained only by the processes of mutation and sexual recombina­
tion, but we now know that the pace of evolution is accelerated by the transfer and acquisition
of modules of genetic information. This phenomenon is widespread in modern members
of the Bacteria and Archaea and can occur via three processes. During the process known
as transformation, cells may take up and express naked DNA from the environment, while
conjugation relies on cell–cell contact mediated by pili. The most important source of HGT
is the process of transduction by phages (viruses infecting bacterial or archaeal cells and
introducing “foreign” DNA); this is explored in detail in Chapter 7. The enormous diversity
of marine viruses and the identification of a viral origin of genes in many marine organisms
indicate how important this process has been throughout evolution.

Viruses are non-cellular entities with great


importance in marine ecosystems
Virus particles (virions) consist of a protein capsid containing the viral genome composed of
either RNA or DNA. Because they only contain one type of nucleic acid, viruses must infect
living cells and take over the host’s cellular machinery in order to replicate. It is often thought
that viruses could have evolved (perhaps from bacteria) as obligate parasites that have progres­
sively lost genetic information until they consist of only a few genes, or that they represent
fragments of host-cell RNA or DNA that have gained independence from cellular control. New
ideas about the evolution of viruses are discussed in Chapter 7. The genome of viruses often
contains sequences that are equivalent to specific sequences in the host cell. Viruses exist for
every major group of cellular organisms (Bacteria, Archaea, Fungi, protists, plants, and ani­
mals), but at present we have knowledge of only a tiny proportion of the viruses infecting
marine life. As discussed in Chapter 7, recognition of the abundance and diversity of marine
Microbes in the Marine Environment 5

viruses, and the role that they play in biogeochemical cycles and the control of diversity in
marine microbial communities, has been one of the most important discoveries of recent years.
? TIME TO CHOP DOWN
THE “TREE OF LIFE”?
The idea that relationships
Microbial processes shape the living world between all living organisms can
be represented as a tree of life
Probably the most important overriding features of microbes are their exceptional diversity
helped to shape Darwin’s theory
and ability to occupy every conceivable habitat for life. Indeed, what we consider “conceiv­
of evolution by natural selection
able” is challenged constantly by the discovery of new microbial communities in habitats and has been deeply embed-
previously thought of as inhospitable or carrying out processes that we had no idea were ded in the philosophy of biology
microbial in nature. Bacteria and archaea have shaped the subsequent development of life for more than 150 years. As the
on Earth ever since their first appearance—the metabolic processes that they carry out in importance of endosymbiosis and
the transformation of elements, degradation of organic matter, and recycling of nutrients HGT became better understood,
play a central role in innumerable activities that affect the support and maintenance of all some evolutionary scientists began
other forms of life. Microbial life and the Earth have evolved together, and the activities of to question the validity of the
microbes have affected the physical and geochemical properties of the planet. Indeed, they “tree of life” concept. A seminal
are actually the driving forces responsible for major planetary processes like changes in the paper by Doolittle (1999) argued
that “Molecular phylogeneticists
composition of the atmosphere, oceans, soil, and rocks. This is especially relevant to our
will have failed to find the ‘true
consideration of the marine environment, in view of the huge proportion of the biosphere tree’, not because their methods
that this constitutes. Despite the preponderance of microbes and the importance of their are inadequate or because they
activities, they are unseen in everyday human experience. Microbes live and grow almost have chosen the wrong genes, but
everywhere, using a huge range of resources, whereas plants and animals occupy only a small because the history of life cannot
subset of possible environments and have a comparatively narrow range of lifestyles. properly be represented as a tree.”
Relationships are now envisaged
as complex intertwined branches,
Marine microbes show great variation in size more like a web (Figure 1.1B) or
network of genomes (Dagan and
Table 1.1 shows the range of dimensions and volumes of some representative marine microbes. Martin, 2009). However, this
Even by the usual standards of microbiology, the most abundant microbes found in seawater remains a controversial topic, and
are exceptionally small—much smaller than implied by the common textbook or internet some have argued that analysis
statement that “bacteria are typically a few micrometers in length.” Their very small size is of genome sequences for “core
the main reason that appreciation of their abundance eluded us for so long. As described in genes” still supports the idea of a
Chapter 2, recognition of the abundance of marine microbes depended on the development common ancestor and branching
of fine-pore filters and direct counting methods using epifluorescence microscopy and flow tree (Ciccarelli et al., 2006)—an
cytometry. Small cell size has great significance in terms of the physical processes that affect approach that worked successfully
for Hug et al. (2016) to develop a
life. At the microscale, the rate of molecular diffusion becomes the most important mecha­
new tree of all major groups of life
nism for transport of substances into and out of the cell. Small cells feeding by absorption
(Figure 1.1C).
(osmotrophy) can take up nutrients more efficiently than larger cells. The surface area to
volume ratio (SA/V) is the critical factor because as cell size increases, volume (V) increases
more quickly than surface area (SA), as shown in Figure 1.2A.

The most abundant ocean bacteria and archaea have very small cell volumes and large SA/V
ratios. The majority are smaller than about 0.6 μm in their largest dimension, and many are
less than 0.3 μm, with cell volumes as low as 0.003 μm3. Indeed, the most abundant type
of organism in the oceans (the SAR11 clade, Figure 1.3A) has some of the smallest known
cells. If nutrients are severely limiting, as they are in most of the oceans, selection will favor
small cells. Since the first description of such small cells, termed “ultramicrobacteria,” their
size has provoked considerable controversy. Such extremely small cells could result from a
genetically fixed phenotype maintained throughout the cell cycle or because of physiologi­
cal changes associated with starvation. The latter explanation is supported by the fact that
some cultured bacteria become much smaller when starved. Most naturally occurring bacteria
(identified only by their genetic “signature”) have been impossible to grow in culture—this
is a central problem in marine microbiology, which we shall return to on several occasions
in future chapters. Because of this, it has been difficult to determine whether small size is a
genotypically determined condition for marine bacteria. However, studies with some recently
cultured marine bacteria from low-nutrient (oligotrophic) ocean environments show that addi­
tion of nutrients does not cause an increase in cell size. Cells use various strategies to increase
the SA/V ratio and thus improve efficiency of diffusion and transport. In fact, spherical cells
are the least efficient shape for nutrient uptake, and many marine bacteria and archaea are
thin rods or filaments or may have appendages such as stalks or buds. Figure 1.2B shows
examples of the diverse morphology of marine bacteria in a sample of ocean water. Many of
6 Chapter 1

Table 1.1 Size range of some representative marine microbes

Organism Characteristics Size Volume


(μm)a (μm3)b

Brevidensovirus Icosahedral DNA virus infecting shrimp 0.02 0.000004

Coccolithovirus Icosahedral DNA virus infecting Emiliania huxleyi 0.17 0.003

Thermodiscus Disc-shaped. Hyperthermophilic archaeon 0.2 × 0.08 0.003

“Ca. Pelagibacter ubique”c Crescent-shaped bacterium ubiquitous in ocean plankton (cultured 0.1 × 0.9 0.01
example of SAR11 clade)

Megavirus chilensis Giant virus infecting marine amoebae 0.44 0.045

Prochlorococcus Cocci. Dominant photosynthetic ocean bacterium 0.6 0.1

Ostreococcus Cocci. Prasinophyte alga. Smallest known eukaryote 0.8 0.3

Vibrio Curved rods. Bacteria common in coastal environments and associated 1×2 2
with animals and human diseases

Pelagomonas calceolata Photosynthetic flagellate adapted to low light 2 24

Pseudo-nitzschia Pennate diatom which produces toxic domoic acid 5 × 80 1600

Staphylothermus marinus Cocci. Hyperthermophilic archaeon 15 1800

Thioploca auraucae Filamentous. Sulfur bacterium 30 × 43 30000

Lingulodinium polyedra Bioluminescent bloom-forming dinoflagellate 50 65000

Beggiatoa Filamentous. Sulfur bacterium 50 × 160 314000

Epulopiscium fishelsoni Rods. Bacteria symbiotic in fish gut 80 × 600 3000000

Thiomargarita namibiensis Cocci. Sulfur bacterium 300d 14137100


aApproximate diameter × length; where one value is given, this is the diameter of spherical virus particles or cells. bApproximate values calculated

assuming spherical or cylindrical shapes. cCandidatus, provisional taxonomic name—see Chapter 4. dCells up to 750 μm have been recorded.

the larger organisms overcome the problems of diffusion by having extensive invaginations of
the cytoplasmic membrane or large intracellular vacuoles, increasing the SA. Small cell size
also has important implications for mechanisms of active motility and chemotaxis, because of
the microscale effects of Brownian movement (bombardment by water molecules) and shear
forces. Small marine bacteria have mechanisms of motility and chemotaxis quite unlike those
with which we are familiar from laboratory studies of organisms such as Escherichia coli.

As shown in Table 1.1, marine eukaryotic microbes also show a considerable variation in
size. Many protists have cellular dimensions that are more typical of the familiar bacteria.
The smallest known eukaryote is Ostreococcus tauri, which is only about 0.8 μm in diameter
(Figure 1.3B). Again, the realization that such small cells (now referred to as “picoeukary-
otes”) play a key role in ocean processes escaped attention until quite recently. Many small
protists seem capable of engulfing bacteria of almost the same size as themselves or can prey
on much larger organisms. Many groups of the flagellates, ciliates, diatoms, and dinoflagel-
lates are somewhat larger, reaching sizes up to 200 μm, and amoeboid types (radiolarians and
foraminifera) can be millimeters in diameter. Finally, a few types of bacteria can be bigger
than many protists. The largest of these is Thiomargarita namibiensis (Figure 1.3C). Further
discussion of the size range of microbes is given in the section on plankton below.

OCEAN HABITATS
The world’s oceans and seas form an
interconnected water system
The oceans cover 3.6 × 108 km2 (71% of the Earth’s surface) and contain 1.4 × 1021 liters of
water (97% of the total on Earth). The average depth of the oceans is 3.8 km, with a number
of deep-sea trenches, the deepest of which is the Marianas Trench in the Pacific (11 km). The
Microbes in the Marine Environment 7

Figure 1.2 (a) Diagrammatic rep-


resentation of three spherical cells
showing a reduction in the ratio
of surface area (SA) to volume (V)
as size increases. V is a function of
r = 1.0 µm r = 2.0 µm r = 3.0 µm the cube of the radius (V = (4 / 3)πr 3 )
SA = 12.6 µm2 SA = 50.3 µm2 SA = 113.1 µm
2

V = 4.2 µm3 V = 33.5 µm3 V = 113.1 µm


3 whereas SA is a function of the
square of the radius (SA = 4πr2). Cells
with large SA/V ratios are more
efficient at obtaining scarce nutrients
by absorption across the membrane.
(b) Scanning electron micrograph
of picoplankton, showing various
cell morphologies of marine bac-
SA/V = 3.0 SA/V = 1.5 SA/V = 1.0 teria (cells are artificially colorized
(a) for effect). Bar represents ~ 1 μm.
Credit: Ed DeLong, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology.

(b)

ocean floor contains large mountain ranges and is the site of almost all the volcanic activity
on Earth. More than 80% of the area and 90% of the volume of the oceans occurs beyond the
continental shelf. Most of the deep-sea remains unexplored. It is usual to recognize five major
ocean basins, although they actually form one interconnected water system.

The Pacific is the deepest and largest ocean, almost as large as all the others combined. This
single body of water has an area of 1.6 × 108 km2. The ocean floor in the eastern Pacific is
dominated by the East Pacific Rise, while the western Pacific is dissected by deep trenches.
The Atlantic Ocean is the second largest with an area of 7.7 × 107 km2 lying between Africa,
Europe, the Southern Ocean, and the Americas. The mid-Atlantic Ridge is an underwater
mountain range stretching down the entire Atlantic basin and the deepest point is the Puerto
Rico Trench (8.1 km). The Indian Ocean has an area of 6.9 × 107 km2 and lies between Africa,
the Southern Ocean, Asia, and Australia. A series of ocean ridges cross the basin, and the
deepest point is the Java Trench (7.3 km). The Southern Ocean is the body of water between
60°S and Antarctica. It covers 2.0 × 107 km2 and has a fairly uniform depth of 4–5 km, with
a continual eastward water movement called the Atlantic Circumpolar Current. The Arctic
Ocean, lying north of the Arctic Circle, is the smallest ocean, with an area of 1.4 × 107 km2. As
well as the major oceans, there are marginal seas, including the Mediterranean, Caribbean,
Baltic, Bering, South China Seas, and many others.

At the margins of major landmasses, the ocean is shallow and lies over an extension of the
land called the continental shelf. This extends offshore for a distance ranging from a few
kilometers to several hundred kilometers and slopes gently to a depth of about 100–200 m,
8 Chapter 1

Figure 1.3 Extremes of size in


marine microbes (note different scale
bars). A. Cryo-electron tomography
of “Candidatus Pelagibacter ubique”
cells, one of the smallest bacteria
known (a cultivated representative
of the abundant SAR11 clade). Left:
a tomographic slice of a typical log-
phase cell. Right: the 3D isosurface-
rendered model of the same cell
reveals internal cellular organization.
Model coloring: outer membrane
(blue), inner membrane (cyan),
peptidoglycan (white), cytoplasm
(orange), nucleoid (red), ribosome-
like particles are represented by
yellow spheres. B. Transmission
electron micrograph (TEM) of sec-
tion of Ostreococcus tauri, the small-
est known eukaryote. N = nucleus,
m = mitochondrion, c = chloroplast.
C. Light micrograph of Thiomargarita
namibiensis, the largest known
bacterium, showing sulfur gran-
ules. Credits: A. Xiaowei Zhao and
Daniela Nicastro, University of
Texas SW Medical Center, Stephen before there is a steeper drop-off to become the continental slope. The abyssal plain covers
Giovannoni, Oregon State University, much of the ocean floor; this is a mostly flat surface with few features, but is broken in vari­
and J. Richard McIntosh, University ous places by ocean ridges, deep-sea trenches, undersea mountains, and volcanic sites.
of Colorado. B. Reprinted from
Henderson et al. (2007), CC-BY-2.0.
C. Heide Schulz-Vogt, Max Planck The upper surface of the ocean is in
Institute for Marine Microbiology, constant motion owing to winds
Bremen.
Rotation of the Earth deflects moving air and water in a phenomenon known as the Coriolis
Effect. Wind belts created by differential heating of air masses move the surface water, and in
combination with the Coriolis Effect they generate major surface current systems. This leads
to large circular gyres that move clockwise in the northern hemisphere and anticlockwise
in the southern hemisphere. Such gyres and currents affect the distribution of nutrients and
marine organisms. On the basis of surface ocean temperatures, the marine ecosystem can be
divided into four major biogeographical zones, namely polar, cold temperate, warm temper­
ate (subtropical), and tropical (equatorial). The boundaries between these zones are roughly
defined by latitude but are strongly affected by surface currents moving heat away from the
equator, as well as varying with the season.

Deep-water circulation systems transport


water between the ocean basins
Below a depth of about 200 m, ocean water is less affected by mixing and wind-generated
currents. However, a system of vast undersea rivers transports water around the globe and
has a major influence on the distribution of nutrients (Figures 1.4 and 8.1). This ther­
mohaline circulation system—often referred to as the “global ocean conveyor belt”—is
formed by the effects of temperature and salinity causing differences in the density of
water. Surface water in the North Atlantic flows toward the pole as the Gulf Stream. Water
is removed to the atmosphere by evaporation and during the formation of sea ice in high
latitudes, resulting in higher salinity. The cold, salty water becomes denser and sinks to
form a deep pool, which then flows south toward Antarctica, where more cold, dense water
is added. The current then splits, with one branch going toward the Indian Ocean and the
other to the Pacific Ocean. As the current nears the equator it warms and becomes less
dense, so upwelling occurs. The warmer waters loop back to the Atlantic Ocean, where
they start the cycle again.
Microbes in the Marine Environment 9

Figure 1.4 A. The thermohaline


circulation system (global ocean
“conveyor belt”). (Credit: NASA/JPL.)
B. Approximate locations of the
major warm (red) and cold (blue)
ocean currents and the gyres in the
South Pacific (SPG), North Pacific
(NPG), North Atlantic (NAG), South
Atlantic (SAG), and Indian Ocean
(IOG).

Light and temperature have important


effects on microbial processes
Light is of fundamental importance in the ecology of microbes that use light energy for photo­
synthesis and other functions, thus affecting primary productivity. The extent to which light of
different wavelengths penetrates seawater depends on a number of factors, notably cloud cover,
the polar ice caps, dust in the atmosphere, and variation of the incident angle of solar radiation
according to season and location on the Earth’s surface. Light is absorbed or scattered by organ­
isms and suspended particles. Even in the clearest ocean water, photosynthesis is restricted by
the availability of light of sufficient intensity to the upper 150–200 m (Figure 1.5). This is termed
the photic or euphotic zone (from the Greek for “well lit”). Blue light has the deepest penetration,
and photosynthetic microbes at the lower part of the photic zone have light-harvesting systems
that are tuned to collect blue light most efficiently (p.134). In turbid coastal waters, during sea­
sonal plankton blooms, the euphotic zone may be only a few meters deep, and green and yellow
light have the deepest penetration. Solar radiation also heats surface waters and leads to thermal
stratification of seawater. In tropical seas, the continual input of energy from sunlight leads to
warming of the surface waters to 25–30°C, causing a considerable difference in density from
that of deeper waters. Thus, throughout the year, there is a marked thermocline at about 100–150
m, below which there is a sudden reduction in temperature to 10°C or less. Little mixing occurs
between these layers. In polar seas, the water is permanently cold except for a brief period in
the summer, when a slight thermocline develops. Apart from this period, turbulence created by
surface winds generates mixing of the water to considerable depths. Temperate seas show the
greatest seasonal variation in the thermocline, with strong winds and low temperatures leading
to extensive mixing in the winter. The thermocline develops in the spring, leading to a marked
shallow surface layer of warmer water in summer. As the sea cools and wind increases, the ther­
mocline breaks down again in the autumn. Combined with seasonal variations in light intensity,
these effects of temperature stratification and vertical mixing have a great impact on rates of
photosynthesis and other microbial activities that affect the entire trophic system.
10 Chapter 1

Figure 1.5 Penetration of light of


different wavelengths in seawater.
Credit: Kyle Carothers, NOAA-OE.

Microbes occur in all the varied


habitats found in the oceans
Various ecological zones can be recognized in the marine environment, as shown in
Figure 1.6. Microbes are found everywhere—as members of the plankton, associated with
suspended particles and colloidal materials, attached to surfaces like rocks and submerged
structures, in association with plants and animals, or in sediments.

Plankton is a general term in marine biology referring to organisms suspended in the water
column that do not have sufficient power of locomotion to resist large-scale water currents (in
contrast to the nekton, which are strong-swimming animals). Traditionally, biologists refer
to phytoplankton (plants) and zooplankton (animals). Using this approach, we can add the
terms bacterioplankton for bacteria, virioplankton for viruses, and mycoplankton for fungi.
Traditional concepts of “plant” and “animal” are now unsatisfactory, and the term phytoplank­

? WHY IS THE

SEA SALTY?

ton therefore refers to all photosynthetic microbes, including cyanobacteria, as well as algae
and other eukaryotic protists. Of course, phytoplankton is only active in the photic zone, but
The constant percolation of rain- heterotrophic protists are found at all depths, where active bacterial and archaeal production
water through soil and rocks leads provides their food source. Another approach to classifying the plankton is in terms of size
to weathering, in which some of classes, for which a logarithmic scale ranging from megaplankton (>20 mm) to femtoplankton
the minerals are dissolved. Ground (<0.2 μm) has been devised. Table 1.2 shows the size classes that encompass marine microbes.
water has very low levels of salts Thus, the viruses constitute the femtoplankton, and bacteria and archaea mainly occur in the
and we cannot taste it in the water picoplankton. The recently discovered giant viruses (see Chapter 7) may also be considered
we drink. The addition of salts to to be part of the picoplankton size range. While protists (eukaryotic microbes) have a wide
the oceans from rivers is thus a size range and occur in the picoplankton, nanoplankton, and microplankton, we now know
very slow process, but evaporation
that in most marine samples, the majority of protistan cells are in the picoplankton range. This
of water from the oceans to form
clouds means that the salt concen- system of tenfold progression is not rigorously adhered to, and many investigators define pico­
tration has increased to its present plankton as organisms ≤3 µm. (This cut-off value provides a more coherent pattern in surveys
level over hundreds of millions of to estimate seasonal or geographic changes in abundance of small eukaryotes measured by
years. Seawater also percolates into filtration). Because individual taxa of photosynthetic and heterotrophic protists can span these
the ocean crust where it becomes three size ranges, this system is of little use in identification and classification. However, it is
heated and dissolves minerals, useful for specifying the size ranges that are likely to be collected using filters or meshes with
emerging at hydrothermal vents different cut-off values. It is also useful when considering the feeding of heterotrophic protists,
(Figure 1.13). Submarine volcanoes which generally graze by phagocytosis of organisms in the next size class down. Although
also result in reactions between there are important exceptions, the predator–prey size ratio is typically about 10:1.
seawater and hot rock, resulting in
the release of salts. The salt con-
centration in the oceans appears to Seawater is a complex mixture of inorganic and
be stable, with deposition of salts
in sediments balancing the inputs organic compounds, colloids, and gels
from weathering, hydrothermal
Seawater is a slightly alkaline (pH 7.5–8.4) aqueous solution—a complex mixture of more
vents, and volcanic activity.
than 80 solid elements, gases, and dissolved organic substances. The concentration of these
Microbes in the Marine Environment 11

Estuarine and intertidal Figure 1.6 The major ecological


Epibionts: inanimate objects, detritus zones of the oceans and marine
Estuarine and intertidal Photic zone Plankton and marine snow microbial habitats (not to scale).
Epi- and endobionts: Epi- and endobionts: Epi- and endosymbionts,
coastal plants and animals algae and animals pelagic animals
Depth (m)
Neuston
0
Littoral Cold seeps Epipelagic
(coastal) 100–200
Shelf Mesopelagic
10°C 700–1000
Slope Bathypelagic
<4°C 2000–4000
Hydrothermal vents Abyssopelagic
Sediments, reefs, vents
and seeps. Epi- and Abyssal
endobionts: benthic animals 6000
plain
Hadalpelagic

Neritic (shelf) Deep-sea


10 000
trench

varies considerably according to geographic and physical factors, and it is customary to refer
to the salinity of seawater in parts per thousand (‰) to indicate the concentration of dissolved
substances. The open ocean has a salinity in the range 34–37‰, with differences in different
regions due to dilution by rainfall and evaporation. Oceans in subtropical latitudes have the
highest salinity as a result of higher temperatures, while temperate oceans have lower salinity
as a result of less evaporation. In coastal regions, seawater is diluted considerably by fresh-
water from rivers and terrestrial runoff and is in the range 10–32‰. Conversely, in enclosed
areas such as the Red Sea and Arabian Gulf, the salinity may be as high as 44‰. In polar
areas, the removal of freshwater by the formation of ice also leads to increased salinity. The
major ionic components of seawater are sodium (55% w/v), chloride (31%), sulfate (8%), mag-
nesium (4%), calcium (1%), and potassium (1%). Together, these constitute more than 99%
of the weight of salts. There are four minor ions—namely bicarbonate, bromide, borate, and
strontium—which together make up just less than 1% of seawater. Many other elements are
present in trace amounts (<0.01%), including key nutrients such as nitrate, phosphate, silicate,
and iron. The concentration of these is crucial in determining the growth of marine microbes
and the net productivity of marine systems, as discussed in Chapter 9.

Table 1.2 Classification of plankton by size

Size category Size Examples of microbial groups


range
(μm)

Femtoplankton 0.01–0.2 Virusesa

Picoplankton 0.2–2 (3)b Bacteriac, archaea,


prasinophytes, haptophytes,
some flagellates

Nanoplankton 2–20 Coccolithophores, diatoms,


dinoflagellates, flagellates

Microplankton 20–200 Ciliates, diatoms,


dinoflagellates, foraminifera,
yeasts

aSome giant viruses are >1 µm long. bA value of ≤3 µm is most commonly used, see text. cSome
filamentous cyanobacteria and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria occur in larger size classes (see Table 1.1).
12 Chapter 1

The concentration of salts has a marked effect on the physical properties of seawater. The
freezing point of seawater at 35‰ is −1.9°C, and seawater increases in density up to this point.
As noted above, this results in the formation of masses of cold, dense water in polar regions,
which sink to the bottom of the ocean basins and are dispersed by deep-water circulation cur­
rents. Differences in the density of seawater create a discontinuity called the pycnocline, which
separates the top few hundred meters of the water column from deeper water. This has great
significance, because the gases oxygen and carbon dioxide are more soluble in cold water.

Oxygen is at its highest concentrations in the top 10–20 m of water, owing to exchange
with the atmosphere and production of oxygen by photosynthetic plankton. Concentration
decreases with distance from the surface until it reaches a minimum between 200 and 1000
m, and bacterial decomposition of organic matter may create conditions that are almost
anoxic. Below this, the oxygen content increases again as a result of the presence of dense
water (with increased solubility at lower temperature) that has sunk from polar regions and
been transported on the thermohaline circulation system. This oxygen gradient varies greatly
in different regions, and there are several regions where large bodies of hypoxic water occur
at relatively shallow depths—these are the oxygen minimum zones (Figure 9.7).

The solubility of carbon dioxide is an important factor in controlling the exchange of carbon
between the atmosphere and the oceans and therefore is of huge significance in understand­
ing climatic processes, as discussed in Chapter 8. Only a very small proportion of dissolved
inorganic carbon (DIC) is present in the form of dissolved CO2 gas. Carbon dioxide reacts
with water to form carbonic acid, which rapidly dissociates to form bicarbonate, hydrogen
ions, and carbonate in the reactions:

CO2 (gas) + H 2O � H 2 CO3 � H + + HCO3 − � 2H + + CO32−

These reactions tend to stay in equilibrium, buffering the pH of seawater within a narrow
range and constraining the amount of CO2 taken up from the atmosphere. However, the
IS “DISSOLVED
? ORGANIC MATTER”
REALLY DISSOLVED?
increasing atmospheric levels of CO2 since the industrial revolution are shifting the equilib­
rium and causing the pH to fall because of increased levels of H+ ions, leading to the phe­
nomenon known as ocean acidification, which may have major consequences for ocean life.
Oceanographers tradition-
ally describe organic matter as It is tempting to think of seawater as a homogeneous fluid, with planktonic microbes and nutri­
“dissolved” and “particulate’ ents evenly distributed within it. However, a growing body of evidence indicates that there
(DOM and POM, respectively).
is microscale heterogeneity in the distribution of nutrients around organisms and particles of
Measurements of concentrations
organic matter. Large-scale processes like productivity, nutrient recycling, and geochemical
and fluxes of DOM and its con-
stituent elements carbon (DOC), cycles are the result of microbial activity. In turn, physical processes like turbulence, pho­
nitrogen (DON), and phospho- ton flux, and gas exchange are translated down to the microscale level, affecting microbial
rus (DOP) are among the most behavior and metabolism. Physical factors such as diffusion, shear forces, and viscosity must
important factors in the study of be considered in this context. A pool of small, soluble organic molecules provides the starting
ocean processes. It is important material for bacterial productivity and recycling or carbon compounds that drives ocean food
to remember that the difference webs (see Chapter 8). Only molecules of less than about 600 Da can be assimilated across the
between “dissolved” and “particu- membrane—any larger molecules must be broken down by extracellular enzymes. Seawater
late” is a purely empirical distinc- contains vast amounts of polymers in the form of proteins, carbohydrates, and nucleic acids,
tion, reflecting the size of filters resulting from excretion by organisms or the release of their cellular material by lysis. Free
used in sample preparation. There
dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the form of polymeric macromolecules can spontane­
is no absolute definition, but most
filters used in studies of DOM and
ously assemble to form gels in surface waters, which coalesce to form larger aggregates
POM have pore sizes from about that diffuse into the bulk seawater. It is estimated that at least 10% of organic carbon in the
0.45 to 1.0 μm. Many bacteria oceans exists in this form. We can envisage seawater as a complex three-dimensional gel-like
and almost all viruses would pass network with a continuum between dissolved, colloidal, and particulate material (Figure 1.7).
through such filters and there- As a result, at a micrometer scale—the realm of the microbes—there is great patchiness in
fore appear in the DOM fraction! the distribution of nutrients and the physical properties of microenvironments.
Colloidal material and polymers
aggregate to form particles, and it These microgels can further coalesce into larger structures termed transparent exopolymeric
is only low-molecular-weight com- particles (TEP). These are especially important in the carbon cycle, because they are criti­
pounds like sugars and amino acids
cal in promoting the formation of particles that are sufficiently dense to sink through the
that are truly dissolved. Thus, DOM
water column, depositing carbon in the depths of the ocean and its sediments. This con­
and POM form a continuum, with
microbes spanning both fractions. tinuous shower of clumps and strings of material which falls through the water column is
termed “marine snow” because of its resemblance to falling snowflakes when illuminated
Microbes in the Marine Environment 13

Figure 1.7 Representation of the


size continuum of marine particles,
indicating the size range of plank-
tonic microbes and methods used
to study the different fractions.
Reprinted from Verdugo et al. (2004)
with permission from Elsevier.

underwater. Marine snow consists of aggregates of plankton cells, detritus from dead or
dying plankton, zooplankton fecal material, and inorganic particles, glued together by the
matrix of TEP released from plankton (Figure 1.8). Most particles are 0.5 to a few microme­
ters in diameter, but they can grow to several centimeters in calm waters. Dissolved polymers
aggregate to form nanogels, stabilized by calcium binding. Larger aggregates form microgels
as a result of collision and coagulation of primary particles, and they increase in size as they
acquire more material through these physical processes. The nucleus for snow formation is
often the mucus-based feeding structures used by salps and larvaceans in the zooplankton.
Dying diatoms, at the end of a bloom, often precipitate large-scale snow formation owing to
the production of large amounts of mucopolysaccharides in their cell walls. The generation
of water currents during feeding by flagellates and ciliates colonizing the aggregate also col­
lects particles from the surrounding water and leads to growth of the snow particle.

Marine snow is mainly produced in the upper 100–200 m of the water column, and large par­
ticles can sink up to 100 m per day, allowing them to travel from the surface to the ocean deep
within a matter of days. This is the main mechanism by which a proportion of the photosyn­
thetically fixed carbon is transported from the surface layers of the ocean to deeper waters
and the seafloor. However, aggregates also contain active complex assemblages of bacteria and
protists that graze on them. Levels of microorganisms in marine snow are typically 108–109
mL−1, which are about 100–10000-fold higher than in the bulk water column. As particles sink,
organic material is degraded by extracellular enzymes produced by the resident microbial pop­
ulation. Microbial respiration creates anoxic conditions, so that diverse aerobic and anaerobic
microbes colonize different niches within the snow particle. The rate of solubilization exceeds
the rate of remineralization, so dissolved material leaks from snow particles, leaving a plume of
nutrients in its wake as it spreads by diffusion and advection. This may send chemical signals
that attract small zooplankton to consume the particle as food. The trailing plume also provides
a concentrated nutrient source for suspended planktonic bacteria, which may show chemotac­
tic behavior in order to remain within favorable concentrations. Thus, much of the carbon is
recycled during its descent, but some material reaches the ocean bottom, where it is consumed
by benthic organisms or leads to the formation of sediments. Photosynthesis by algae and bac­
teria leads to the formation of organic material through CO2 fixation, but viruses, heterotrophic
bacteria, and protists all play a part in the fate of this fixed carbon. The balance of their activi­
ties throughout the water column determines the proportions of fixed carbon that are reminer­
alized to CO2, transferred to higher trophic levels, or reach the seafloor. The discovery of this
mechanism, termed the microbial loop, was one of the most important conceptual advances in
biological oceanography, and its significance is considered further in Chapter 8. The sinking
rate of marine snow particles depends greatly in their composition—one area of considerable
current interest and importance is the extent to which microplastics and microbes can affect the
settlement of particles. This is explored in Box 13.1.
14 Chapter 1

Figure 1.8 Schematic diagram Surface Phytoplankton


showing the microbial processes Free-living microbes colonize
occurring in the formation and fate plume of DOM leaching
of a marine snow particle as it falls from sinking particle Metazoan
through the water column. The zooplankton
action of extracellular enzymes and
viral lysis leads to the release of dis- Grazing
solved organic material (DOM).
Bacteria, protists

Chemotaxis

Cellular detritus,
CO2
fecal pellets

Bacterial and
Mucus
protist
assemblages
within particle

Grazing

HOW DID
? CHERNOBYL FALLOUT
HELP THE STUDY OF
Deep ocean Metazoan
zooplankton
MARINE SNOW?
In 1986, a major environmental The sea surface is covered by a gelatinous biofilm
catastrophe occurred when the
nuclear reactor in Chernobyl, The interface between the sea surface and the atmosphere is the site of the exchange of gases,
Ukraine exploded, releasing hun- aerosols and trace elements, in both directions Figure 1.9). We know now that the sea surface
dreds of tons of radioactive par- microlayer (SML, typically up to 1 mm thick) has very different physicochemical and micro-
ticles. These were carried by wind bial composition from the underlying seawater. It contains high concentrations of lipids,
to many distant regions and settled proteins, and polysaccharides, much of it aggregated into TEPs, formed mainly from phy-
with rain on land and sea. Fowler toplankton as described above. The organisms associated with this surface layer are known
et al. (1987) were able to extract
as the neuston. Analysis of the microbial community of the SML shows that the bacterial
some benefit from this tragedy.
community composition contains distinct taxa, but these are interconnected to those in bulk
They had set up sediment traps
to measure vertical transport in seawater below. Surface wind, exposure to UV irradiation, deposition of air-borne dust, and
the Mediterranean Sea. Following other factors are important in determining the composition of the bacterioneuston, and these
the Chernobyl fallout, they found vary greatly according to location. The composition of the phytoneuston—microalgae found
that the pulse of radioactivity— in the SML—is also very different from the phytoplankton, especially in the diversity of
especially the rare nuclides 141Ce diatoms. Recently, fungi have been shown to be a significant component of the SML (p.187).
and 144Ce—was transported to The physical properties of the sea surface are altered by the presence of the SML through the
depths of over 200 m within a few production of surfactants, which modify phenomena such as turbulence and the formation of
days at a rate of 29 m per day. bubbles and micro-waves. This is often visible in the form of surface slicks of calmer water.
Physical processes alone could not This affects the transfer of microbes and organic compounds into the atmosphere via aerosols
account for such rapid settlement.
produced by wind action, which is linked to the formation of clouds and ice, affecting local
Fowler and colleagues concluded
that zooplankton were ingesting
and global climatic conditions (Figure 1.9). This topic is explored further in Chapter 9.
radioactive particles adsorbed to
their food source and repackaging
them as larger, denser particles in SEDIMENTS AND SURFACES
fecal pellets that aggregated with
marine snow to sink at a high rate. Microbes play a major role in marine sediments
Subsequent studies have shown
that the fecal pellets of different More than 70% of the Earth’s surface is covered by marine sediments. On the continental
zooplankton species vary greatly in shelf, sediments are formed due to the accumulation of eroded materials transported into the
their density and sinking rate. ocean as particles of mud, sand, or gravel, together with copious particulate organic matter,
Microbes in the Marine Environment 15

Figure 1.9 Conceptual view of the


processes determining transport
across the sea surface microlayer
(SML). Reprinted from Engel et al.
(2017), CC-BY 3.0.

carbonate- and silica-rich compounds produced by biological activity. The mineral compo­
sition reflects the nature of the rocks and the type of weathering. Large rivers such as the
Amazon, Orinoco, or Ganges transfer millions of tons of fine sediments to the ocean each
year. Most of this mud settles along the continental margins or is funneled as dilute suspen­
sions by submarine canyons. Here, the sediments may be more than 10 km thick. By con­
trast, in much of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans underneath the ocean gyres, the sediments
may only be 100–1000 m thick. Here, far from the continental land masses, abyssal clays are
formed by the deposition of fine sediments from the continents mixed with wind-blown dust,
volcanic ash, and cosmogenic dust from meteor impact. These accumulate very slowly—less
than 1 mm per 1000 years—while biogenous oozes accumulate at up to 4 cm per 1000 years.
Biogenous oozes contain over 30% of material of biological origin, mainly shells of protistan HOW MANY

plankton, mixed with clay. Oozes are usually insignificant in the shallow waters near conti­
nents. Calcareous oozes or muds cover nearly 50% of the ocean floor, especially in the Indian
? MICROBES ARE ON

A GRAIN OF SAND?

and Atlantic Oceans. They are formed by the deposition of the calcium carbonate shells (tests)
of two main types of protist: the coccolithophorids and the foraminifera (see Chapter 6). To answer this question, Probandt
et al. (2018) developed a method
Siliceous oozes are formed from the shells (frustules) of diatoms and radiolarians, which are
to examine individual grains of
composed of opaline silica (SiO2.nH2O). The rate of accumulation of biogenous oozes depends sand from a coastal sediment using
on the rate of production of organisms in the plankton, the rate of destruction during descent to fluorescent in situ hybridization
the seafloor, and the extent to which they are diluted by mixing with other sediments. (FISH) and confocal microscopy,
together with polymerase chain
In the case of coccolithophorids and foraminifera, depth has an important effect on reaction (PCR) amplification of
dissolution of the calcified scales or shells. At relatively high temperatures near the rRNA genes (see Chapter 2 for
surface, seawater is saturated with CaCO3. As calcareous shells sink, CaCO3 becomes methods). They found that indi-
more soluble as a result of the increased content of CO2 in water at lower temperatures vidual grains (just 202–635 µm
and higher pressures. The carbonate compensation depth is the depth at which carbon­ diameter) were colonized by a
highly diverse community of 104 –
ate input from the surface waters is balanced by dissolution in deep waters; this varies
105 microbes (mostly bacteria, with
between 3000 m in polar waters and 5000 m in tropical waters. For this reason, calcare­
smaller numbers of archaea and a
ous oozes tend not to form in waters more than 5000 m deep. Similarly, not all of the few eukaryotes), densely packed in
silica in the frustules of diatoms reaches the ocean floor because bacterial action has a thin film in the indentations on
been shown to play a large part in the dissolution of diatom shells during their descent the sand grain. The wide range of
(p.182). The rate of deposition of protist remains to the seabed is much more rapid than taxa and functional groups found
would be assumed from their small size. This is because they are aggregated into larger shows that the variable physical
particles through egestion as fecal pellets after grazing by zooplankton and through the conditions and nutrient availability
formation of marine snow as described above. In shallower waters near the continen­ in these grains of surface sediment
tal shelf, the high input of terrigenous sediments mixes with and dilutes sediments of clearly provide the right microen-
biogenous origin. vironments for many of the major
metabolic transformations carried
out by different microbial groups—
There is increasing recognition of the importance of microbial activities in the sediment– a microbial zoo on a tiny grain
water interface (SWI) and deep-sea benthic boundary layer (BBL), which is a layer of homo­ of sand!
geneous water 10 m or more thick, adjacent to the sediment surface. The SWI includes high
16 Chapter 1

concentrations of particulate organic debris and dissolved organic compounds that become
adsorbed onto mineral particles.

In nutrient-rich areas with high rates of microbial activity, oxygen may be present in only the
top few millimeters or few centimeters of the sediment, but the structure and composition
of the microbial habitat is modified by benthic “storms” and the action of animals such as
worms and burrowing shrimps, which move and resuspend sediments, transporting oxygen
into deeper layers (bioturbation).

As well as the constant “snowfall” of plankton-derived material, concentrated nutrient inputs


reach the seabed in the form of large animal carcasses. For example, time-lapse photography
has shown how quickly fallen whale carcasses attract colonies of animals, and microbiologi­
cal studies accompanying these investigations have yielded novel bacteria, some with bio­
technological applications (p.390). The microbial communities and symbioses that develop
are similar to those found at hydrothermal vents and cold seeps. Other types of sediment that
provide special habitats for microbes include those in salt marshes, mangroves, and coral
reefs.

Studies of the extent to which carbon fixed in the photic zone finds its way to the seabed, and
its fate in sediments, are important in understanding the role of the oceans in the planetary
carbon cycle. Microbial processes such as production and oxidation of methane and oxidation
and reduction of sulfur compounds are of special interest. Studies of the diversity and activ­
ity of microbial life in the various types of sediment are yielding many new insights, mainly
because of the application of molecular techniques, and these are described in subsequent
chapters.

Deep marine sediments contain a vast


reservoir of ancient microbes
The microbiology of deep marine sediments and subsurface rocks is an area of current active
investigation using deep-core drilling and novel coring devices, and microbes have been
detected to a depth of 1.6 km in porous layers that were laid down as sediments tens or hun­
dreds of million years ago (MYA). Current estimates of the global distribution of bacteria
and archaea in deep sediments, obtained using a variety of techniques, give a consensus
value of about 3 × 1029 bacterial and archaeal cells. The deep biosphere remains one of the
most inaccessible ecosystems on Earth and investigation is expensive and technologically
challenging, but recent research is providing new insights leading to the conclusion that most
organisms are “barely alive” descendants of cells buried over millions of years, as discussed
in Box 1.1)

Microbes colonize surfaces through


formation of biofilms and mats
In the last few decades, the special phenomena that govern the colonization of surfaces by
microbes have come under intense scrutiny, with the growing recognition that such bio­
film formation involves complex physicochemical processes and community interactions.
Biofilms consist of a collection of microbes bound to a solid surface by their extracellular
products, which trap organic and inorganic components. In the marine environment, all kinds
of surfaces including other microbes, plants, animals, sediment particles, rocks, and fabri­
cated structures may become colonized by biofilms. Biofilm formation is considered in more
detail in Chapter 3, and its economic importance in biofouling is discussed in Chapter 13.

As a result of metabolic processes, ecological succession can result in the development of


multi-layered structures known as microbial mats. Mats can be several millimeters to a few
centimeters thick. Depending on the nutritional and environmental conditions, mats may
contain multiple types of bacteria, archaea, protists, and fungi (and their viruses) in combina­
tion with microbial polymers and sedimentary materials. These are particularly important in
shallow and intertidal waters, but they are also found in deeper nutrient-rich water. The com­
position of microbial mats is affected by physical factors such as light, temperature, water
Microbes in the Marine Environment 17

Figure 1.10 Global distribution of


subseafloor sedimentary cell abun-
dance. A. Sedimentation rate. B.
Distance from shore. C. Integrated
number of cells. Reprinted from
Kallmeyer et al. (2012) with per-
mission from National Academy of
Sciences.

content, and flow rate; and by chemical factors such as pH, redox potential, the concentration
of molecular oxygen, sulfide, nitrate, iron, and dissolved organic compounds. Phototrophic
bacteria and diatoms are major components of stratified microbial mats in the photic zone,
and the species composition and zonation are determined by the intensity and wavelength
of light penetration into the mat. Light normally only penetrates about 1 mm into the mat
and anoxic conditions develop below this. The formation and diurnal variations of physico­
chemical gradients (especially of oxygen and sulfide) have a major effect on the distribution
of organisms in the mat. Microbial mats formed by chemosynthetic bacteria are common at
hydrothermal vents (Figure 1.12A).

Stromatolites are formed by the trapping of sedimentary particles, cemented together by


microbial exudates to form reefs or pillar-like structures. Fossils of stromatolites are common
in ancient rocks (Figure 1.12B). Cyanobacteria are active on the surface of the structures and
the underlying material is formed by a slow build-up of lithified remains of the former growth
(<1 mm per year). They occur today in a few shallow marine lagoons, such as Shark Bay in
Western Australia (Figure 1.12C).
18 Chapter 1

BOX 1.1 RESEARCH FOCUS

Deep subsurface microbes—are they dead, dormant, or just staying alive?

Studying deep subsurface sediments. Ensuring that samples are to explain the long-term maintenance of microbes in the sediments
recovered without contamination during drilling is a major chal- over millions of years. They concluded that the organisms in the deep
lenge, depending on multi-national consortia of microbiologists, oligotrophic sediments survive by using the low available energy to
geologists, and chemists, such as the Integrated Ocean Discovery just “staying alive,” rather than growing and reproducing. The rate
Programme (IODP) (Hoehler and Jørgensen, 2013) operating spe- of respiration in these deep sediments was found to be about 104
cialized drilling ships (Figure 1.11). Based on analysis of various times lower than at the seafloor and the density of organisms is only
studies using epifluorescence counts, Whitman et al. (1998) esti- about 100–1000 cells cm−3. Jørgensen (2011) estimates that cells with
mated of the number of bacteria and archaeal cells in the deep such a low metabolic rate might reproduce only once every several
marine subsurface sediments at 3.5 × 1030 bacterial and archaeal thousand years. One possibility is that cells in this nutrient-deprived,
cells. More recent calculations put the figure about ten times lower, semi-solid environment are not subject to predation by protists or
with an estimated biomass of 10 Gt (Pg) carbon (Bar-On et al., attack by viruses and this enables a stable population to exist, with
2018). What are all these organisms doing—are they dead, dor- cells devoting all their metabolic efforts to maintenance (turnover
mant, or alive? Different investigators have produced conflicting and repair of essential cell components like DNA, proteins, and
opinions on this issue (reviewed by Orcutt et al., 2013). membrane lipids) rather than growth and reproduction.

In ocean regions with high productivity, oxygen becomes quickly Could such cells be stimulated into a more active lifestyle? In
depleted below the seafloor and the anaerobic reduction of sulfate experiments conducted by Morono et al. (2011), deep sediments
coupled to the oxidation of organic matter is the dominant metabolic from beneath the Japan sea were incubated with isotope-labeled
process in sediments. However, under the extremely oligotrophic nutrients such as glucose or amino acids. They found that most of
subtropical ocean gyres, the rate of deposition of organic material the cells incorporated these nutrients, increasing their metabolic
reaching the seabed is so low (a few millimeters every 1000 years) rate 1000 times. This could be explained if most of the cells are
that oxygen can penetrate far below the seafloor (Røy et al., 2012). in a truly dormant state, such as endospores that become activated
The amount of energy available to sustain life under these conditions into vegetative growth by the addition of nutrients. This is known
is very limited. Bradley et al. (2019) developed a mathematical model to occur in laboratory studies of endospores. Although endospores
are found in deep sediments and could survive long periods of
environmental stress such as starvation, Jørgensen (2011) argues
that the amount of energy needed to germinate and return to an
active growth state far exceeds that found in these deeply buried,
ancient sediments. Trembath-Reichert et al. (2017) analyzed mate-
rial recovered from a coal seam 2.5 km below the seabed off the
coast of Japan. In this deep sample, the tiny microbial cells were
very scarce (10–100 cm−3) and DNA sequence analysis showed that
the bacterial community composition was more closely related to
that found in forest soil than in marine sediments. This indicates
that they originate from rich organic material from primeval forests
that was buried by subsidence into the ocean over 20 million years
ago and subsequently overlaid by 2 km thick shales. Studies of the
diversity of deep subsurface communities are still rather limited,
although metagenomic analyses are beginning to yield valuable
information. Based on studies of distinctive membrane lipids, sup-
ported by nucleic acid-based techniques, in sediments more than 1
m deep, it appears that archaea constitute a much greater proportion
of the biomass than bacteria (Lipp et al. 2008). Archaea may have a
selective advantage due to the nature of their cell membranes.

Do populations of these buried microbes adapt to the new


low-nutrient conditions by evolving? To answer this question,
Starnawski et al. (2017) investigated the assembly and evolution
of microbial communities in 8700-year-old 10 m thick sediments
in Arhus Bay, Denmark. They used DNA sequencing techniques
to show that a small number of specific bacterial types were pres-
Figure 1.11 A. The ocean drilling vessel JOIDES Resolution. ent throughout all sample depths. This subset represented a small
B. Sampling a sediment core for microbial analysis. Credit: proportion of the diversity near the surface but made up 40–50%
William Crawford, Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, US of the total microbial community in the deeper layers. The authors
Implementing Organization.
Microbes in the Marine Environment 19

BOX 1.1 RESEARCH FOCUS

concluded that rare members of surface sediment microbial commu- concluded that as populations were separated over time (thousands)
nities become predominant as they become buried over thousands of years and space (tens of meters) during burial, there was hardly
of years. By comparing the whole genome sequences obtained from any accumulation of mutations. Given the extremely low generation
single cells from different depths, they showed that their genetic times of cells due to low-nutrient availability, they suggested that
diversification is minimal. Since the stable structure of the sedi- their findings can be generalized to the deepest sediments, which
ments prevents exchange of cells or genes, Starnawski et al. (2017) are millions of years old.

SOME EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL HABITATS—THE MICROBIAL MATS


DEEP SEA, POLAR OCEANS, CORAL i AND EVOLUTION
REEFS, AND LIVING ORGANISMS Some of Earth’s oldest sedimentary
rocks in Western Australia contain
Microbial activity at hydrothermal vents evidence of complex microbial
communities that existed 3.48
fuels an oasis of life in the deep sea billion years ago (BYA). These
Hydrothermal vents form a specialized and highly significant habitat for microbes. They fossilized microbially induced
occur mainly at the mid-ocean ridges at the boundary of the Earth’s tectonic plates, where sedimentary structures (MISS) and
seafloor spreading and formation of new ocean crust is occurring (Figure 1.13A). Over 300 stromatolites are believed to have
formed from mats colonizing an
such sites have been studied in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans and many others are pre-
ancient shoreline or lagoon and
dicted on the basis of geological surveys. Seawater permeates through cracks and fissures
consist of layers of sediment and
in the crust and interacts with the heated underlying rocks, thereby changing the chemical organic material (Noffke et al.,
and physical characteristics of both the seawater and the rock. The permeability structure 2013). These ancient MISS prob-
of the ocean crust and the location of the heat source determine the circulation patterns of ably contained anaerobic photo-
hydrothermal fluids. As cold seawater penetrates into the ocean crust, it is gradually heated trophic bacteria. Cyanobacteria
along its flow path, leading to the removal of magnesium from the fluid into the rock, with evolved subsequently (~3 BYA),
production of acid during the process. This leads to the leaching of other major elements and and this led to the development
transition metals from the rock into the hydrothermal fluid, and sulfate in the seawater is of an oxygen-containing atmo-
removed by precipitation and reduction to hydrogen sulfide. As the percolating fluids reach sphere. This heralded the evolu-
tion of eukaryotic organisms (~2
the proximity of the magma heat source, extensive chemical reactions occur within the rock
BYA) and eventually, multicellular
and the pressurized fluids are heated to over 350°C, becoming buoyant and rising toward the
life (0.6 BYA). Until the start of
ocean floor. As they rise, decompression causes the fluids to cool slightly, and precipitation the Cambrian period (~0.54 BYA),
of metal sulfides and other compounds occurs en route. The hydrothermal fluid is injected microbial mats are believed to have
dominated the surface of the ocean
floor, but this is thought to have
ended with the diversification of
animals that began burrowing into
the seabed.

Figure 1.12 A. Chemosynthetic


microbial mats covering red algae
and coral in an area where hydro-
thermal vent and coral reef com-
munities overlap at 190 m depth. B.
Cross section of stromatolite fossil
(Eocene period, 56–34 MYA) from
Fort Laclede Bed, Wyoming showing
layered structure due to microbial
growth and sediment accumula-
tion. C. Stromatolites at the hyper-
saline Hamelin Pool, Shark Bay, W.
Australia. Credits: A. Submarine
Ring of Fire 2004 Exploration,
NOAA Vents Program; B. James St.
John, CC-BY-SA-2.0 via Wikimedia
Commons; C. Bryn Pnzauger. CC BY
2.0 via Wikimedia Commons.
20 Chapter 1

Figure 1.13 A. Schematic diagram


of processes occurring at hydro- Seawater Plume of superheated vent
thermal vent systems. Gradients of enters
and manganese oxides and
temperature and chemical elements ocean crust silicates precipitate in seawater
create a variety of habitats for diverse
microbial and animal communities. 350°C
B. A venting black smoker emit-
“Smoker” chimney
ting jets of particles of iron sulfide. formed by massive
Image shows a dense colony of Riftia Sedimentation
preciptation of
pachyptila giant tubeworms. Credit:
NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Plume at warm vent
Laboratory. 6–23°C Seawater 2–4°C

Shallow rocks
10–200 m (20–100°C )

Permeat ion Deep rocks


1–3 km (> 350°C) enriched with Cu,
Mn, Fe, Zn, S, Si

Magma heat source

A.

B.

into the ocean as plumes of mineral-rich superheated water. The hottest plumes (up to 350°C)
are generally black, because of the high content of metal sulfide and sulfate particles, and
precipitation occurs as the hot plume mixes with the cold seawater. Some of these precipitates
form chimney structures called “black smokers” (Figure 1.13B) while others are dispersed
through the water and form sediments in the vicinity. In other parts of the vent field, the cir-
culation of hydrothermal fluid may be shallower, leading to diffuse plumes of water heated
to 6–23°C. The gradients of temperature and nutrients that exist at hydrothermal systems
provide a great diversity of habitats for microbes suspended in the surrounding heated waters,
in sediments, and attached to surfaces of the chimneys. Many of these are hyperthermo-
philic bacteria and archaea, which can grow at temperatures up to 121°C, while others grow
at lower temperatures further from the fluid emissions. Molecular studies are revealing an
Microbes in the Marine Environment 21

astonishing diversity of such organisms, many of which have biotechnological applications.


HOW VULNERABLE

The microbiology of the deep subsurface rocks beneath vents is also now under investigation,
and many novel microbes and metabolic processes are being discovered. Microbial activity ? ARE VENT

COMMUNITIES?

in the deep subsurface contributes to the chemical changes in composition during circulation
of the hydrothermal fluids. Hydrothermal vent communities
are among the most productive
Hydrothermal vent systems were first described in 1977, when scientists aboard the submers­ ecosystems on Earth, but they
ible Alvin, from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, were exploring the seabed about cover a relatively small area and
2500 m deep near the Galapagos Islands. The discovery of life around the vents was totally are very ephemeral, lasting only
months or a few years. The flow of
unexpected. The Alvin scientists observed dense communities of previously unknown ani­
vent fluids may gradually decline,
mals, including giant tubeworms, clams, anemones, crabs, and many others. Subsequent
or volcanic eruptions may destroy
research showed that the warm waters near hydrothermal vents contain large populations the site completely. The key ani-
of chemosynthetic bacteria and archaea, which fix CO2 using energy from the oxidation of mals inhabiting these sites depend
sulfides in the vent fluids. This metabolism supports a food chain with many trophic levels on production of large quantities
that is independent of photosynthesis. We now know that many of the animals at vent sites of larvae with sufficiently long
contain chemosynthetic bacteria as symbionts within their tissues or on their surfaces—these lifespans for them to be dispersed
relationships are discussed in Chapter 10. In addition, bacterial populations directly support via currents until a new vent site
the growth of filter-feeding animals, such as clams and mussels, or shrimp that graze on is located. Goffredi et al. (2017)
microbial mats. Previously, animal life was thought always to rely ultimately on the fixation showed that differences in the
of CO2 by photosynthesis, but the vent communities function without the input of material overlying sediment and the chem-
istry of vent fluids can result in
derived from the use of light energy, although the sulfide oxidation depends on dissolved
colonization of neighboring vents
oxygen in the water, and the origin of this is photosynthetic. by very different animal species.
Vent ecosystems clearly show resil-
ience to natural disturbance but
Cold seeps also support diverse life may be threatened by undersea
based on chemosynthesis mining for rare minerals deposited
around vents unless effective con-
Cold seeps are abundant along the continental shelf and slope, where the upwards percola­ servation measures are put in place
tion of fluids through fissures in the sediments is caused by plate tectonic activity and other (Van Dover, 2014).
geological processes, allowing high concentrations of hydrocarbons to seep into the water
column. The temperature of emissions is the same as ambient seawater, or just a little higher,
but they were described as “cold” seeps to distinguish them from the warm and superheated
hydrothermal vents. Cold seeps were first discovered in 1983 in the Gulf of Mexico at a depth
of 3.2 km and have subsequently been found in many other regions. They are most common
along the continental margins, and although they usually occur in deep water (the deepest is
at 7.3 km in the Japan Trench), there are some shallow seeps off the coasts of Chile, northern
California, Oregon, and Denmark.

Methane is produced in anoxic sediments by a range of methanogenic archaea (p.87), and in


very deep sediments it is formed by through thermogenic chemical transformation of organic
matter at high pressure and temperature. Methane has a low density and rises to stability
zones with a specific combination of temperature and pressure under the seabed, where it
combines with water molecules combine to form a stable crystalline structure (clathrate).
Seeps are formed when fissures occur, destabilizing the clathrate due to changes in tempera­
ture or pressure. Some sites are associated with seeps of hypersaline brines or leakage of oil
or gas from hydrocarbons reservoirs. The methane supports prolific chemosynthetic com­
munities consisting of free-living methanotrophic bacteria and archaea, as well as those liv­
ing symbiotically with invertebrates, including bivalve mollusks from five different families
and siboglinid tubeworms (Chapter 10). Reef-like structures are created by the deposition of
calcium carbonate as a product of the anaerobic oxidation of methane (p.89) by consortia of
methanotrophic archaea and sulfate-reducing and bacteria. A wide range of other animals
including polychaete worms, sea stars, urchins, echinoderms, gastropods, crabs and lobsters,
and shrimp are sustained by this chemosynthetic community (Figure 1.14).

Microbes inhabit the interface of


brine pools in the deep sea
Distinct pools of hypersaline water occur in the Gulf of Mexico, Red Sea, and Eastern
Mediterranean Sea, created by movement of the Earth’s crust. For example, those in the
Mediterranean Sea are thought to have been formed when a large area of the sea became
22 Chapter 1

isolated from the Atlantic Ocean about 250 MYA. Regions of the sea evaporated, leaving a

i
LISTENING IN TO
layer of rock salt, which later became covered by sediments after the Mediterranean basin
METHANE SEEPS
reflooded. Movement of the tectonic plates has exposed the salt deposits in a few areas. Here,
To date, most methane seeps the salts have dissolved to form dense pockets of highly concentrated solutions of different
have been discovered via under- salts, separated from the overlying seawater by extremely sharp density gradients (pycno­
water exploration using manned clines) and environmental interfaces (chemoclines). These undersea brine pools have extreme
submersibles or remotely oper- physical and chemical conditions, notably the complete lack of oxygen and near-saturated
ated underwater vehicles (ROVs, solutions of salts (up to ten times the salinity of seawater). They are therefore termed Deep
p.32). Scientists recently detected
Sea, Hypersaline, Anoxic Basins (DHABs).
nearly 1000 seeps about 16 km
off the coast of Oregon by using a
hydrophone to record the sound
The interface is just a few meters thick, and accurate sampling within this chemocline at
of methane bubbles escaping from such a great depth requires great ingenuity. Conventional remotely operated vehicles (ROVs)
the seabed. Dziak et al. (2018) and manned submersibles cannot be used because of the damaging properties of the brines.
found that the frequency of the Because of the extreme conditions, organisms growing in such habitats require special adap­
sound emitted is related to the size tations, and it might be expected that the diversity of microbial types would be low. However,
of the gas bubble. The next step through the use of DNA-based identification methods, many previously unknown taxa of bac­
will be to fine-tune the detec- teria have been identified, occupying narrow niches in the highly stratified interface. Archaea
tion process, so that hydrophone appear to be less prevalent than bacteria. The low availability of organic compounds at such
methods can be used directly to depths suggests that chemoautotrophic metabolism sustains these communities and there is
estimate the size of the methane
evidence for production of methane and sulfur cycling. Eukaryotic microbes (heterotrophic
reservoirs.
protists) are also abundant at the interface, and there is extensive grazing of the bacteria. It
appears that some protists may be protected from the extreme anoxic and sulfidic chemical
conditions by symbiotic interactions or partnerships with bacteria. Each basin seems to be
inhabited by a distinctive set of microbial species, which have adapted through evolution to
the unique chemical conditions of each DHAB.

At the edge of some brine pools, there are communities of mussels containing chemosyn­
thetic bacteria and associated invertebrates, similar to those found at methane seeps.

Microbes in sea ice form an important part


of the food web in polar regions
At the poles, the temperature is so low during the winter that large areas of seawater freeze to
form sea ice, some of which forms adjacent to the coastal shoreline and some of which forms
floating masses of pack ice. Sea ice forms when the temperature is less than −1.9°C, the freez­
ing point of water at 35‰ salinity. The first stage in sea-ice formation is the accumulation of
minute crystals of frazil ice on the surface, which are driven by wind and wave action into
aggregated clumps called grease ice. These turn into pancake-shaped ice floes that freeze
together and form a solid ice cover. At the winter maxima, the combined coverage by sea ice
at the north and south polar regions is almost 10% of the Earth’s surface (1.8 × 107 km2 in
the Antarctic and 1.5 × 107 km2 in the Arctic). During the formation of frazil ice, planktonic
microbes become trapped between the ice crystals and wave motion transports more organ­
isms into the grease ice during its formation. Near the ice-air interface, temperatures may be

Figure 1.14 Mussels and shrimp at


a chemosynthetic cold-seep com-
munity, Gulf of Mexico. Credit:
NOAA-OE, Expedition to the Deep
Slope 2007.
Microbes in the Marine Environment 23

as low as −20°C during the depths of the polar winter, while the temperature at the ice-water
interface remains fairly constant at about −2°C. When seawater freezes, it forms a crystal­
line lattice of pure water, excluding salts from the crystal structure. The salinity of the liquid
phase increases, and its freezing point drops still further. This very cold, high-density, high-
salinity (up to 150‰) water forms brine pockets or channels within the ice, which can remain
liquid to −35°C. The ice becomes less dense than seawater and rises above sea level, with the
channels draining brine through the ice to the underlying seawater. Thus, sea ice is very dif­
ferent from freshwater glacial ice. Loss of sea ice cover is a topic of great concern (Box 1.2).

The structure of sea ice provides a labyrinth of different microhabitats for microbes, with varia­
tions in temperature, salinity, nutrient concentration, and light penetration. This enables coloni­
zation and active metabolism by distinctive mixed communities of cold-adapted (psychrophilic)
photosynthetic and heterotrophic protists and bacteria, as well as viruses. Microbial activities
also alter the physicochemical conditions, mainly owing to the production of large amounts
of cryoprotectant compounds and extracellular polymers, leading to the creation of additional
microenvironments. The dominant photosynthetic organisms near the ice–sea interface are pen­
nate diatoms and small dinoflagellates (Figure 1.15A). The density of diatoms in sea ice may be
up to 1000 times that in surface waters. Through photosynthesis, the microalgae make a small,
but significant, contribution to primary productivity in the polar regions. For example, the con­
tribution of sea ice to primary productivity in the Southern Ocean is only about 5% of the total,
but it extends the short summer period of primary production and provides a concentrated food
source that sustains the food web during the winter. During the Antarctic winter, microalgae on
the undersurface of sea ice are the main source of food for grazing krill, shrimp-like crustaceans
that are the main diet of fish, birds, and mammals in the Southern Ocean. A wide range of pro­
tists and heterotrophic bacteria have been found in sea ice, including new species with biotechno­
logical potential. Some microbes remain active—albeit at a much-reduced metabolic rate—even
in the coldest parts of the ice and in “frost flowers” formed on the surface of the ice, where they
are trapped in pockets of very low temperatures and high-salinity (Figure 1.15B).

Figure 1.15 (a) Light microscopy


image of diatoms living in annual
sea ice, McMurdo Sound, Antarctica.
(b) Frost flowers over young sea ice
in the central Arctic Ocean. Credits:
(a) Gordon T. Taylor, NOAA Corps
Collection. (b) Matthias Wietz, MPI
Marine Microbiology, Bremen.
24 Chapter 1

BOX 1.2 RESEARCH FOCUS

What will happen when the sea-ice melts?

Global warming is affecting polar regions more rapidly than trophic levels. Thus, an increase in small Synechococcus in place
any other parts of the planet. Although there is a large natural of larger phytoplankton in a warmer Arctic Ocean could have major
annual variation in the thickness and extent of summer sea ice in the effects on transfer of productivity to other organisms.
Arctic Ocean, these have shown a dramatic decline since the 1970s.
In 2018, some of the thickest and oldest areas of ice to the north of Benthic microbes are also affected. Antje Boetius and colleagues
Greenland started to break up (Figure 1.16). Notz and Stroeve (2016) at the Alfred Wegener Institute and Max Planck Institute of Marine
provide compelling evidence that this is directly linked to CO2 emis- Microbiology are undertaking an intensive research program to inves-
sions as a result of human activity, and their models predict that the tigate the microbiology of current and archived samples of Arctic
Arctic Ocean will be free of summer ice by the end of this century. deep-sea sediments, revealing important information about changes
The loss of ice cover results in changes to wind patterns and warmer in microbial diversity and how the flux of particulate organic mat-
and less saline waters in the upper ocean. Also, we now know that ter is affected by the loss of permanent ice cover. Rapp et al. (2018)
sea ice absorbs large amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere (Søgaard report the analysis of microbial communities in areas affected by the
et al., 2013). Most significantly, loss of summer ice also reduces the summer ice melt in 2012, which was the largest decline to date. Vast
albedo effect resulting in a positive feedback, which increases the quantities of ice algae associated with the underside of the sea ice
absorption of solar energy by seawater rather than reflecting sun- became detached and sank to the seafloor at over 4000 m in depth.
light. This further accelerates the rise in temperature. Many scien- Using high-throughput DNA sequencing, Rapp and colleagues stud-
tific programmes are investigating the impact of these changes and ied the diversity of different groups of microbes in the sea ice, in
microbiological research is especially important. We urgently need melt water and in the surface sediment beneath the melting ice. The
to know how changes in microbial communities and their activities sea-ice algae aggregates were shown to be mostly composed of dia-
are altering the cycling of carbon and other elements. toms, especially Melosira arctica. The large filaments of this diatom
sank rapidly to the seabed. The sinking aggregates were shown to
Changes in Arctic picophytoplankton. One example of change transport bacteria such as Flavobacteriia and Gammaproteobacteria,
has been observed in apparent shifts of picophytoplankton diversity including Glaciecola and Paraglaciecola. These are known to be
in the Arctic Ocean. Paulsen et al. (2016) found high numbers of the actively involved in the breakdown of algal and other organic mate-
cyanobacterium Synechococcus at high latitudes. This was surpris- rial via the production of extracellular enzymes. Labyrinthulids were
ing, as Arctic water masses are usually thought to be dominated also detected—these protists are known to be active in degradation
by larger picoeukaryotes adapted to low temperatures, such as of algae (p.183). Rapp et al. found that the algal deposits changed
Micromonas spp. This could be attributed in part to a change in the the community composition on the seafloor by introducing bacteria
flow of water from the Atlantic into the Arctic Ocean due to global from the sea ice, although these appeared to be overgrown by spe-
warming, but analysis of the distribution of different genetic clades cific groups of indigenous deep-sea bacteria within a few months.
of the cyanobacteria suggests that some of them have adapted to If strong summer ice melting becomes a regular occurrence as pre-
Arctic conditions. Because populations of Synechococcus are con- dicted, the abrupt export of large amounts of sea-ice algae and asso-
trolled by grazing by small heterotrophic protists, Paulsen and col- ciated microbiota will become more frequent. The authors suggest
leagues concluded that much of their biomass would be recycled that this could lead to permanent changes in bacterial community
within the microbial loop (p.220), rather than transferring to higher composition, which may lead to significant changes in the cycling of
nutrients in the surface sediments.

Changes in Antarctic food webs. Warming is also occurring in


the Antarctic, where increased melting of the ice-sheets increases
the input of fresh water, altering the salinity and structure of the
surrounding water column. Consequent changes in ocean food web
structures will also affect benthic communities, as seasonal shifts
in different types of phytoplankton in the water column or underside
of sea ice will affect the flow of fixed carbon to the seafloor. Based
on a large-scale study of microbial diversity in Antarctic sediments,
Learman et al. (2016) found that community composition varied
greatly with geographic location and was strongly influenced by
the nature of organic matter reaching the seafloor. Warming could
lead to an increase in meltwater, stimulating increased phytoplank-
ton blooms transporting organic matter to the seabed. Learman and
Figure 1.16 Time series showing the Arctic ice remain- colleagues suggest that this might cause a shift from communi-
ing at the end each summer melt season since 1985. The ties dominated by lithotrophic organisms (such as some types of
area of the oldest ice has declined 16-fold. Credit: M. archaea) to a greater proportion of chemoheterotrophs. This could
Tschudi, S. Stewart, University of Colorado, and W. Meier, cause significant changes to biogeochemical cycling.
J. Stroeve, NSIDC.
Microbes in the Marine Environment 25

Microbial activity underpins productive


food webs in coral reefs
The most familiar coral reefs are those found in the shallow photic zone, especially in tropi-
cal and subtropical areas. These present specialized habitats, in which symbiotic interactions
between corals and microbes are responsible for primary production. Symbiotic dinoflagel-
lates (zooxanthellae) are responsible for the fixation of CO2, which promotes growth of the
coral animal tissue and skeleton, but also leads to large excesses of fixed carbon that fuels
microbial processes in the seawater and sediments surrounding the reef. Corals produce large
amounts of mucus, much of which forms TEPs and gels which provide a major source of
nutrients sustaining the growth of planktonic bacteria or aggregate to form sinking particles
which fuel benthic activities. Thus, although coral reefs only occupy about 0.1% of the sea-
floor area and occur in ocean areas of generally low productivity (due to lack of nutrient
input), they are as productive as tropical rain forests and are estimated to contain a third of
all marine species. Recent studies have shown that many other microbes associated with cor-
als and other reef organisms are involved in the primary production and recycling of carbon,
nitrogen, and other key elements. We now recognize that major phase shifts in microbial
activity are responsible for the degradation of coral reefs, with profound implications for
marine life and the destabilization of safety and livelihood of millions of people. Climate
change is a major threat to the world’s reefs, with severe mass bleaching affecting many
tropical reefs (most notably, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef) in years when average sea sur-
face temperatures have been just 1°C or so above normal. As sea levels rise, reefs may not be
able to grow quickly enough to maintain optimum light levels, while ocean acidification will
reduce their ability to calcify. These issues are discussed in detail in Chapter 10.

Living organisms are the habitats of many microbes


Microbial biofilms also form on the surfaces of all kinds of animals, seaweeds, and coastal plants;
these provide a highly nutritive environment through secretion or leaching of organic compounds.
Many organisms seem selectively to enhance surface colonization by certain microbes and dis-
courage colonization by others. This may occur by the production of specific compounds that
inhibit attachment or growth of certain microbes. Once established, particular microbes may
themselves influence colonization by other types. These processes offer obvious applications in
the control of biofouling (p.356). As well as surface (epibiotic) associations, microorganisms can
form endosymbiotic associations within the body cavities, tissue, or cells of living organisms.

Many microalgae (such as diatoms, dinoflagellates, and prymnesiophytes) and other pro-
tists (such as ciliates) harbor bacteria on their surfaces, or as endosymbionts within their
cells (Figure 4.11). Intimate associations between bacterial and archaeal cells are also being
revealed by new imaging techniques (Figure 5.5). Seaweeds and seagrasses have dense popu-
lations of bacteria (up to 106 per cm2) on their surfaces, although this varies considerably with
species, geographic location, and climatic conditions.

The external surfaces and intestinal content of animals provide a variety of habitats to a wide
diversity of microbes. Such associations commonly lead to some mutual benefit for host and
microbe—examples of symbiotic interactions between animals and microbes are considered
in Chapter 10. Pathogenic interactions may also result—microbial diseases of marine organ-
isms are discussed in Chapter 11.

Conclusions
This chapter has introduced the various types of marine microbes and some of the wide range
of habitats that they occupy. The adaptations of marine microbes to the different physical,
chemical, and biological conditions encountered have led to the evolution of highly diverse
microbes. The discovery that these tiny microbes are present in such large numbers and
biomass—and that they are responsible for the biogeochemical processes that shape our
planet—can be viewed as one of the most important advances of modern science. Subsequent
chapters build on this introduction by exploring the mechanisms underlying this diversity of
form and function.
26 Chapter 1

References and further reading Ocean habitats


Origins and scope of marine microbiology Azam, F. and Long, R. A. (2001). Sea snow microcosms. Nature 414: 495–498.
Azam, F. and Malfatti, F. (2007). Microbial structuring of marine ecosys­
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., and Milo, R. (2018). The biomass distribution
tems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5: 782–791.
on Earth. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 115: 6506–6511.
Costello, M. J. and Breyer, S. (2017). Ocean depths: The mesopelagic and
Brown, J. W. (2015). Principles of Microbial Diversity. ASM Press.
implications for global warming. Curr. Biol. 27: R19–R41.
Caron, D. A., Worden, A. Z., Countway, P. D., et al. (2008). Protists are
Cunliffe, M., Engel, A., Frka, S., et al. (2013). Sea surface microlayers: A
microbes too: A perspective. ISME J. 3: 4–12.
unified physicochemical and biological perspective of the air–ocean inter­
Ciccarelli, F. D., Doerks, T., von Mering, C., et al. (2006). Toward auto­ face. Prog. Oceanog. 109: 104–116.
matic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 312: 697.
Cunliffe, M. and Murrell, J. C. (2009). The sea-surface microlayer is a
Dagan, T. and Martin, W. (2009). Getting a better picture of microbial gelatinous biofilm. ISME J. 3: 1001–1003.
evolution en route to a network of genomes. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B Biol.
Engel, A., Bange, H. W., Cunliffe, M., et al. (2017). The ocean’s vital skin:
Sci. 364: 2187–2196.
Toward an integrated understanding of the sea surface microlayer. Front.
Doolittle, W. F. (1999). Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Mar. Sci. 4: 165.
Science 286: 1433.
Fowler, S. W., Buat-Menard, P., Yokoyama, et al. (1987). Rapid removal of
Embley, M. and Williams T. (2016). Only two domains, not three: Chernobyl fallout from Mediterranean surface waters by biological activ­
Changing views on the tree of life. Microbiol. Today 2016: 70–73. ity. Nature 329: 56–58.
Forterre, P. (2015). The universal tree of life: An update. Front. Microbiol. Grossart, H. P., Kiorboe, T., Tang, K. W., et al. (2006). Interactions
6: 717. between marine snow and heterotrophic bacteria: Aggregate formation
Gasol, J. M. and Kirchman, D. (2018). Introduction: The evolution of and microbial dynamics. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 42: 19–26.
microbial ecology of the ocean. In Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, ed. Kjørboe, T. (2001). Formation and fate of marine snow: Small- scale pro­
Gasol, J. M. and Kirchman, D. L., pp. 1–46, Wiley Blackwell. cesses with large-scale implications. Sci. Mar. 65: 57–71.
Grossart, H.-P. and Rojas-Jiminez, K. (2016). Aquatic fungi: Targeting the Mühlenbruch, M., Grossart, H. P., Eigemann, F., and Voss, M. (2018).
forgotten in microbial ecology. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 31: 140–145. Phytoplankton‐derived polysaccharides in the marine environment and their
Henderson, G. P., Gan, L., and Jensen, G. J. (2007). 3-D ultrastructure interactions with heterotrophic bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 20: 2671–2685.
of O. tauri: Electron cryotomography of an entire eukaryotic cell. PLoS Nissimov, J. I. and Bidle, K. D. (2017). Stress, death, and the biological
ONE 2: e749. glue of sinking matter. J. Phycol. 53: 241–244.
Hug, L. A., Baker, B. J., Anantharaman, K., et al. (2016). A new view of Seymour, J. R. and Stocker, R. (2018). The ocean’s microscale: A microbe’s
the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 1: 16048. view of the sea. In Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, ed. Gasol, J. M. and
Karl, D. M. and Proctor, L. M. (2008). Foundations of microbial oceanog­ Kirchman, D. L., pp. 289–466, Wiley Blackwell.
raphy. Oceanography 20: 16–27. Verde, C., Giordano, D., Bellas, C. M., et al. (2016). Polar marine microor­
Keeling, P. J. and de Campo, J. (2017). Marine protists are not just big ganisms and climate change. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 69: 187–215.
bacteria. Curr. Biol. 27: R451–R459. Verdugo, P., Alldredge, A. L., Azam, F., et al. (2004). The oceanic gel
Kolter, R. and Maloy, S. (eds.) (2012). Microbes and Evolution: The World phase: A bridge in the DOM-POM continuum. Mar. Chem. 92: 67–85.
That Darwin Never Saw. ASM Press.
Lawton, G. (2009). Why Darwin was wrong about the tree of life. New Sediments and surfaces
Sci. 2692: 34–39. Betts, H. C., Puttick, M. N., Clark, J. W., et al. (2018). Integrated genomic
Martin, W. and Embley, T. M. (2004). Evolutionary biology: Early evolu­ and fossil evidence illuminates life’s early evolution and eukaryote origin.
tion comes full circle. Nature 431: 134–137. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2: 1556–1562.
Nasir, A., Kim, K. M., Da Cunha, V., and Caetano-Anollés, G. (2016). Bolhuis, H., Cretoiu, M. S. and Stal, L. J. (2014). Molecular ecology of
Arguments reinforcing the three-domain view of diversified cellular life. microbial mats. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 90: 335–350.
Archaea 2016: 1851865. Bradley, J. A., Amend, J. P., and LaRowe, D. E. (2019). Survival of the few­
Schulz, H. N. and Jørgensen, B. B. (2001). Big bacteria. Annu. Rev. est: Microbial dormancy and maintenance in marine sediments through
Microbiol. 55: 105–137. deep time. Geobiol. 17: 43–59.
Sherr, B. F., Sherr, E. B., Caron, D. A., et al. (2007). Oceanic protists. Corinaldesi, C. (2015). New perspectives in benthic deep-sea microbial
Oceanog. 20: 130–134. ecology. Front. Mar. Sci. 2: 5–17.
Suttle, C. (2005). The viriosphere: The greatest biological diversity on Danovaro, R., Corinaldesi, C., Dell’Anno, A., and Rastelli, E. (2017).
Earth and driver of global processes. Environ. Microbiol. 7: 481–482. Potential impact of global climate change on benthic deep-sea microbes.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 364: 23, fnx214.
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., Wiebe, W. J. (1998). Prokaryotes: The
unseen majority. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 6578–6583. Hoehler, T. M. and Jørgensen, B. B. (2013). Microbial life under extreme
energy limitation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11: 83–94.
Yayanos, A. A. (2003). Marine microbiology at Scripps. Oceanography
16: 63–75. Jørgensen, B. B. (2011). Deep subseafloor microbial cells on physiological
standby. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 18193–18194.
Zhao, X., Schwartz, C. L., Pierson, J., et al. (2017). Three-dimensional
structure of the ultraoligotrophic marine bacterium “Candidatus Jørgensen, B. B. and Boetius, A. (2007). Feast and famine—Microbial life
Pelagibacter ubique”. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83: e02807–16. in the deep-sea bed. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5: 770–781.
Microbes in the Marine Environment 27

Kallmeyer, J., Pockalny, R., Adhikari, R. R., et al. (2012). Global distribu­ Ewert, M. and Deming, J. W. (2013). Sea ice microorganisms:
tion of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment. Proc. Environmental constraints and extracellular responses. Biology 2:
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 16213–16216. 603–628.
Learman, D. R., Henson, M. W., Thrash, J. C., et al. (2016). Biogeochemical Garren, M. and Azam, F. (2012). New directions in coral reef microbial
and microbial variation across 5500 km of Antarctic surface sediment ecology. Environ. Microbiol. 14: 833–844.
implicates organic matter as a driver of benthic community structure. Goffredi, S. K., Johnson, S., Tunnicliffe, V., et al. (2017). Hydrothermal
Front. Microbiol. 7: 284. vent fields discovered in the southern Gulf of California clarify role of
Lipp, J. S., Morono, Y., Inagaki, F., and Hinrichs, K. U. (2008). Significant habitat in augmenting regional diversity. Proc. Roy Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 284:
contribution of Archaea to extant biomass in marine subsurface sedi­ 20170817.
ments. Nature 454: 991–994. Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Hughes, T., Anthony, K., et al. (2009). Coral reefs
Morono, Y., Terada, T., Nishizawa, M., et al. (2011). Carbon and nitrogen and rapid climate change: Impacts, risks and implications for tropical soci­
assimilation in deep subseafloor microbial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. eties. IOP Conf. Ser.:Earth Environ. Sci. 6: 302004.
USA 108: 18295–18300. Kallmeyer, J. ed. (2017). Life at Vents and Seeps. Walter de Gruyter,
Noffke, N., Christian, D., Wacey, D., and Hazen, R. M. (2013). Microbially GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
induced sedimentary structures recording an ancient ecosystem in the Kallmeyer, J., Pockalny, R., Adhikari, R. R., et al. (2012). Global distribu­
ca. 3.48 billion-year-old Dresser Formation, Pilbara, Western Australia. tion of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment. Proc.
Astrobiology 13: 1103–1124. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 16213–16216.
Orsi, W. D. (2018). Ecology and evolution of seafloor and subseafloor Kirchman, D. L., Moran, X. A. G. and Ducklow, H. (2009). Microbial
microbial communities. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16: 671–683. growth in the polar oceans—Role of temperature and potential impact of
Prieto-Barajas, C., Valencia-Cantero, E. and Santoyo, G. (2018). Microbial climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7: 451–459.
mat ecosystems: Structure types, functional diversity, and biotechnologi­ Levin, L. A., Baco, A. R., Bowden, D. A., et al. (2016). Hydrothermal
cal application. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 31: 48–56. vents and methane Seeps: Rethinking the sphere of influence. Front. Mar.
Probandt, D., Eickhorst, T., Ellrott, A., et al. (2018). Microbial life on a Sci. 3: 72.
sand grain: From bulk sediment to single grains. ISME J. 12: 623–633. Martin, W., Baross, J., Kelley, D. and Russell, M. J. (2008). Hydrothermal
Røy, H., Kallmeyer, J., Adhikari, R. R., et al. (2012). Aerobic microbial res­ vents and the origin of life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6: 805–814.
piration in 86-million-year-old deep-sea red clay. Science 336: 922–925. Mock, T. and Thomas, D. N. (2005). Recent advances in sea-ice microbiol­
Schrenk, M. O., Huber, J. A., and Edwards, K. J. (2010). Microbial prov­ ogy. Environ. Microbiol. 7: 605–619.
inces in the subseafloor. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2: 279–304. Notz, D. and Stroeve, J. (2016). Observed Arctic sea-ice loss directly fol­
Starnawski, P., Bataillon, T., Ettema, T. J. G., et al. (2017). Microbial com­ lows anthropogenic CO2 emission. Science 354: 747–750.
munity assembly and evolution in subseafloor sediment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Orcutt, B. N., LaRowe, D. E., Biddle, J. F., et al. (2013). Microbial activity
Sci. USA 114: 2940–2945. in the marine deep biosphere: Progress and prospects. Front. Microbiol.
Trembath-Reichert, E., Morono, Y., Ijiri, A., et al. (2017). Methyl- 4: 189.
compound use and slow growth characterize microbial life in 2-km­ Paulsen, M. L., Doré, H., Garczarek, L., et al. (2016). Synechococcus in
deep subseafloor coal and shale beds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114: the Atlantic Gateway to the Arctic Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 3: 191.
E9206–E9215.
Rapp, J. Z., Fernández-Méndez, M., Bienhold, C., and Boetius, A. (2018).
Some special habitats—the deep sea, polar Effects of ice-algal aggregate export on the connectivity of bacterial com­
munities in the central Arctic Ocean. Front. Microbiol. 9: 1035.
oceans, coral reefs, and living organisms
Reysenbach, A.-L. and Cady, S. L. (2001). Microbiology of ancient and
Arrigo, K. R. and Thomas, D. N. (2004). Large scale importance of sea ice modern hydrothermal systems. Trends Microbiol. 9: 79–86.
biology in the Southern Ocean. Antarctic Sci. 16: 471–486.
Rowher, F. and Youle, M. (2010). Coral Reefs in the Microbial Seas. Plaid
Caron, D. A., Gast, R. J. and Garneau, M. (2017). Sea ice as a habitat for Press, San Diego, CA.
micrograzers. In Sea Ice, ed. Thomas, D. N. pp. 370–393. John Wiley &
Sons Ltd. Silveira, C. B., Cavalcanti, G. S., Walter, J. M., et al. (2017). Microbial
processes driving coral reef organic carbon flow. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
Cavicchioli, R. (2015). Microbial ecology of Antarctic aquatic systems. 41: 575–595.
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13: 691–706.
Søgaard, D. H., Thomas, D. N., Rysgaard, S., et al. (2013). The relative
Deming, J. W. and Collins, R. E. (2017). Sea ice as a habitat for Bacteria, contributions of biological and abiotic processes to carbon dynamics in
Archaea and viruses. In Sea Ice, ed. Thomas, D. N., pp. 370–393. John subarctic sea ice. Polar Biol. 36, 1761–1777.
Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Torda, G., Donelson, J. M., Aranda, M., et al. (2017). Rapid adaptive
Dick, G. J., Anantharaman, K., Baker, B. J., et al. (2013). The microbiol­ responses to climate change in corals. Nat. Clim. Change 7: 627–636.
ogy of deep-sea hydrothermal vent plumes: Ecological and biogeographic
linkages to seafloor and water column habitats. Front. Microbiol.4: 124. Van Dover, C. L. (2014). Impacts of anthropogenic disturbances at deep-
sea hydrothermal vent ecosystems: A review. Mar. Environ. Res. 102:
Dziak, R. P., Matsumoto, H., Embley, R. W., et al. (2018). Passive acous­ 59–72.
tic records of seafloor methane bubble streams on the Oregon continental
margin. Deep Sea Res. II: Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 150: 210–217. Verde, C., Giordano, D., Bellas, C. M., et al. (2016). Polar marine microor­
ganisms and climate change. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 69: 187–215.
References
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., and Milo, R. (2018). The biomass distribution Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., Wiebe, W. J. (1998). Prokaryotes: The
on Earth. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 115: 6506–6511. unseen majority. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 6578–6583.
Brown, J. W. (2015). Principles of Microbial Diversity. ASM Press. Yayanos, A. A. (2003). Marine microbiology at Scripps. Oceanography
Caron, D. A., Worden, A. Z., Countway, P. D., et al. (2008). Protists are 16: 63–75.
microbes too: A perspective. ISME J. 3: 4–12. Zhao, X., Schwartz, C. L., Pierson, J., et al. (2017). Three-dimensional
Ciccarelli, F. D., Doerks, T., von Mering, C., et al. (2006). Toward auto­ structure of the ultraoligotrophic marine bacterium “Candidatus
matic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 312: 697. Pelagibacter ubique”. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83: e02807–16.

Dagan, T. and Martin, W. (2009). Getting a better picture of microbial Azam, F. and Long, R. A. (2001). Sea snow microcosms. Nature 414:
evolution en route to a network of genomes. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B Biol. 495–498.
Sci. 364: 2187–2196. Azam, F. and Malfatti, F. (2007). Microbial structuring of marine ecosys­
Doolittle, W. F. (1999). Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. tems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5: 782–791.
Science 286: 1433. Costello, M. J. and Breyer, S. (2017). Ocean depths: The mesopelagic and
Embley, M. and Williams T. (2016). Only two domains, not three: implications for global warming. Curr. Biol. 27: R19–R41.
Changing views on the tree of life. Microbiol. Today 2016: 70–73. Cunliffe, M., Engel, A., Frka, S., et al. (2013). Sea surface microlayers:
Forterre, P. (2015). The universal tree of life: An update. Front. Microbiol. A unified physicochemical and biological perspective of the air–ocean
6: 717. interface. Prog. Oceanog. 109: 104–116.

Gasol, J. M. and Kirchman, D. (2018). Introduction: The evolution of Cunliffe, M. and Murrell, J. C. (2009). The sea-surface microlayer is a
microbial ecology of the ocean. In Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, ed. gelatinous biofilm. ISME J. 3: 1001–1003.
Gasol, J. M. and Kirchman, D. L., pp. 1–46, Wiley Blackwell. Engel, A., Bange, H. W., Cunliffe, M., et al. (2017). The ocean’s vital skin:
Grossart, H.-P. and Rojas-Jiminez, K. (2016). Aquatic fungi: Targeting Toward an integrated understanding of the sea surface microlayer. Front.
the forgotten in microbial ecology. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 31: 140–145. Mar. Sci. 4: 165.

Henderson, G. P., Gan, L., and Jensen, G. J. (2007). 3-D ultrastructure Fowler, S. W., Buat-Menard, P., Yokoyama, et al. (1987). Rapid removal of
of O. tauri: Electron cryotomography of an entire eukaryotic cell. PLoS Chernobyl fallout from Mediterranean surface waters by biological activ­
ONE 2: e749. ity. Nature 329: 56–58.

Hug, L. A., Baker, B. J., Anantharaman, K., et al. (2016). A new view of Grossart, H. P., Kiorboe, T., Tang, K. W., et al. (2006). Interactions
the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 1: 16048. between marine snow and heterotrophic bacteria: Aggregate formation
and microbial dynamics. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 42: 19–26.
Karl, D. M. and Proctor, L. M. (2008). Foundations of microbial oceanog­
raphy. Oceanography 20: 16–27. Kjørboe, T. (2001). Formation and fate of marine snow: Small- scale pro­
cesses with large-scale implications. Sci. Mar. 65: 57–71.
Keeling, P. J. and de Campo, J. (2017). Marine protists are not just big
bacteria. Curr. Biol. 27: R451–R459. Mühlenbruch, M., Grossart, H. P., Eigemann, F., and Voss, M. (2018).
Phytoplankton‐derived polysaccharides in the marine environment and
Kolter, R. and Maloy, S. (eds.) (2012). Microbes and Evolution: The their interactions with heterotrophic bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 20:
World That Darwin Never Saw. ASM Press. 2671–2685.
Lawton, G. (2009). Why Darwin was wrong about the tree of life. New Nissimov, J. I. and Bidle, K. D. (2017). Stress, death, and the biological
Sci. 2692: 34–39. glue of sinking matter. J. Phycol. 53: 241–244.
Martin, W. and Embley, T. M. (2004). Evolutionary biology: Early evolu­ Seymour, J. R. and Stocker, R. (2018). The ocean’s microscale: A
tion comes full circle. Nature 431: 134–137. microbe’s view of the sea. In Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, ed. Gasol,
Nasir, A., Kim, K. M., Da Cunha, V., and Caetano-Anollés, G. (2016). J. M. and Kirchman, D. L., pp. 289–466, Wiley Blackwell.
Arguments reinforcing the three-domain view of diversified cellular life. Verde, C., Giordano, D., Bellas, C. M., et al. (2016). Polar marine micro­
Archaea 2016: 1851865. organisms and climate change. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 69: 187–215.
Schulz, H. N. and Jørgensen, B. B. (2001). Big bacteria. Annu. Rev. Verdugo, P., Alldredge, A. L., Azam, F., et al. (2004). The oceanic gel
Microbiol. 55: 105–137. phase: A bridge in the DOM-POM continuum. Mar. Chem. 92: 67–85.
Sherr, B. F., Sherr, E. B., Caron, D. A., et al. (2007). Oceanic protists. Betts, H. C., Puttick, M. N., Clark, J. W., et al. (2018). Integrated genomic
Oceanog. 20: 130–134. and fossil evidence illuminates life’s early evolution and eukaryote origin.
Suttle, C. (2005). The viriosphere: The greatest biological diversity on Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2: 1556–1562.
Earth and driver of global processes. Environ. Microbiol. 7: 481–482. Bolhuis, H., Cretoiu, M. S. and Stal, L. J. (2014). Molecular ecology of
microbial mats. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 90: 335–350.
30 References

Bradley, J. A., Amend, J. P., and LaRowe, D. E. (2019). Survival of the Dick, G. J., Anantharaman, K., Baker, B. J., et al. (2013). The microbiol­
fewest: Microbial dormancy and maintenance in marine sediments ogy of deep-sea hydrothermal vent plumes: Ecological and biogeographic
through deep time. Geobiol. 17: 43–59. linkages to seafloor and water column habitats. Front. Microbiol.4: 124.
Corinaldesi, C. (2015). New perspectives in benthic deep-sea microbial Dziak, R. P., Matsumoto, H., Embley, R. W., et al. (2018). Passive acoustic
ecology. Front. Mar. Sci. 2: 5–17. records of seafloor methane bubble streams on the Oregon continental
margin. Deep Sea Res. II: Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 150: 210–217.
Danovaro, R., Corinaldesi, C., Dell’Anno, A., and Rastelli, E. (2017).
Potential impact of global climate change on benthic deep-sea microbes. Ewert, M. and Deming, J. W. (2013). Sea ice microorganisms:
FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 364: 23, fnx214. Environmental constraints and extracellular responses. Biology 2:
603–628.
Hoehler, T. M. and Jørgensen, B. B. (2013). Microbial life under extreme
energy limitation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11: 83–94. Garren, M. and Azam, F. (2012). New directions in coral reef microbial
ecology. Environ. Microbiol. 14: 833–844.
Jørgensen, B. B. (2011). Deep subseafloor microbial cells on physiological
standby. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 18193–18194. Goffredi, S. K., Johnson, S., Tunnicliffe, V., et al. (2017). Hydrothermal
vent fields discovered in the southern Gulf of California clarify role of
Jørgensen, B. B. and Boetius, A. (2007). Feast and famine—Microbial
habitat in augmenting regional diversity. Proc. Roy Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 284:
life in the deep-sea bed. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5: 770–781.
20170817.
Kallmeyer, J., Pockalny, R., Adhikari, R. R., et al. (2012). Global distribu­
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Hughes, T., Anthony, K., et al. (2009). Coral reefs
tion of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment. Proc.
and rapid climate change: Impacts, risks and implications for tropical
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 16213–16216.
societies. IOP Conf. Ser.:Earth Environ. Sci. 6: 302004.
Learman, D. R., Henson, M. W., Thrash, J. C., et al. (2016). Biogeochemical
Kallmeyer, J. ed. (2017). Life at Vents and Seeps. Walter de Gruyter,
and microbial variation across 5500 km of Antarctic surface sediment
GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
implicates organic matter as a driver of benthic community structure.
Front. Microbiol. 7: 284. Kallmeyer, J., Pockalny, R., Adhikari, R. R., et al. (2012). Global distribu­
tion of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment. Proc.
Lipp, J. S., Morono, Y., Inagaki, F., and Hinrichs, K. U. (2008). Significant
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 16213–16216.
contribution of Archaea to extant biomass in marine subsurface sedi­
ments. Nature 454: 991–994. Kirchman, D. L., Moran, X. A. G. and Ducklow, H. (2009). Microbial
growth in the polar oceans—Role of temperature and potential impact of
Morono, Y., Terada, T., Nishizawa, M., et al. (2011). Carbon and nitrogen
climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7: 451–459.
assimilation in deep subseafloor microbial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 108: 18295–18300. Levin, L. A., Baco, A. R., Bowden, D. A., et al. (2016). Hydrothermal
vents and methane Seeps: Rethinking the sphere of influence. Front. Mar.
Noffke, N., Christian, D., Wacey, D., and Hazen, R. M. (2013). Microbially
Sci. 3: 72.
induced sedimentary structures recording an ancient ecosystem in the
ca. 3.48 billion-year-old Dresser Formation, Pilbara, Western Australia. Martin, W., Baross, J., Kelley, D. and Russell, M. J. (2008). Hydrothermal
Astrobiology 13: 1103–1124. vents and the origin of life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6: 805–814.
Orsi, W. D. (2018). Ecology and evolution of seafloor and subseafloor Mock, T. and Thomas, D. N. (2005). Recent advances in sea-ice microbi­
microbial communities. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16: 671–683. ology. Environ. Microbiol. 7: 605–619.
Prieto-Barajas, C., Valencia-Cantero, E. and Santoyo, G. (2018). Microbial Notz, D. and Stroeve, J. (2016). Observed Arctic sea-ice loss directly fol­
mat ecosystems: Structure types, functional diversity, and biotechnologi­ lows anthropogenic CO2 emission. Science 354: 747–750.
cal application. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 31: 48–56.
Orcutt, B. N., LaRowe, D. E., Biddle, J. F., et al. (2013). Microbial activity
Probandt, D., Eickhorst, T., Ellrott, A., et al. (2018). Microbial life on a in the marine deep biosphere: Progress and prospects. Front. Microbiol.
sand grain: From bulk sediment to single grains. ISME J. 12: 623–633. 4: 189.
Røy, H., Kallmeyer, J., Adhikari, R. R., et al. (2012). Aerobic micro­ Paulsen, M. L., Doré, H., Garczarek, L., et al. (2016). Synechococcus in
bial respiration in 86-million-year-old deep-sea red clay. Science 336: the Atlantic Gateway to the Arctic Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 3: 191.
922–925.
Rapp, J. Z., Fernández-Méndez, M., Bienhold, C., and Boetius, A. (2018).
Schrenk, M. O., Huber, J. A., and Edwards, K. J. (2010). Microbial prov­ Effects of ice-algal aggregate export on the connectivity of bacterial com­
inces in the subseafloor. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2: 279–304. munities in the central Arctic Ocean. Front. Microbiol. 9: 1035.
Starnawski, P., Bataillon, T., Ettema, T. J. G., et al. (2017). Microbial Reysenbach, A.-L. and Cady, S. L. (2001). Microbiology of ancient and
community assembly and evolution in subseafloor sediment. Proc. Natl. modern hydrothermal systems. Trends Microbiol. 9: 79–86.
Acad. Sci. USA 114: 2940–2945.
Rowher, F. and Youle, M. (2010). Coral Reefs in the Microbial Seas. Plaid
Trembath-Reichert, E., Morono, Y., Ijiri, A., et al. (2017). Methyl- Press, San Diego, CA.
compound use and slow growth characterize microbial life in 2-km­
Silveira, C. B., Cavalcanti, G. S., Walter, J. M., et al. (2017). Microbial
deep subseafloor coal and shale beds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114:
processes driving coral reef organic carbon flow. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
E9206–E9215.
41: 575–595.
Arrigo, K. R. and Thomas, D. N. (2004). Large scale importance of sea
Søgaard, D. H., Thomas, D. N., Rysgaard, S., et al. (2013). The relative
ice biology in the Southern Ocean. Antarctic Sci. 16: 471–486.
contributions of biological and abiotic processes to carbon dynamics in
Caron, D. A., Gast, R. J. and Garneau, M. (2017). Sea ice as a habitat for subarctic sea ice. Polar Biol. 36, 1761–1777.
micrograzers. In Sea Ice, ed. Thomas, D. N. pp. 370–393. John Wiley &
Torda, G., Donelson, J. M., Aranda, M., et al. (2017). Rapid adaptive
Sons Ltd.
responses to climate change in corals. Nat. Clim. Change 7: 627–636.
Cavicchioli, R. (2015). Microbial ecology of Antarctic aquatic systems.
Van Dover, C. L. (2014). Impacts of anthropogenic disturbances at deep-
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13: 691–706.
sea hydrothermal vent ecosystems: A review. Mar. Environ. Res. 102:
Deming, J. W. and Collins, R. E. (2017). Sea ice as a habitat for Bacteria, 59–72.
Archaea and viruses. In Sea Ice, ed. Thomas, D. N., pp. 370–393. John
Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References 31

Verde, C., Giordano, D., Bellas, C. M., et al. (2016). Polar marine micro­ Stingl, U., Tripp, H.J., & Giovannoni, S.J. (2007) Improvements of high-
organisms and climate change. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 69: 187–215. throughput culturing yielded novel SAR11 strains and other abundant
marine bacteria from the Oregon coast and the Bermuda Atlantic Time
Conathon, M. (2013) Rockets top submarines: Space exploration dollars
Series study site. ISME J. 1: 361–371.
dwarf ocean spending. Center for American Progress. Online at https://
www.americanprogress.org/issues/green/news/2013/06/18/66956/rock­ Zengler, K. (2009) Central role of the cell in microbial ecology. Microbiol.
ets-top-submarines-space-exploration-dollars-dwarf-ocean-spending/ Mol. Biol. Rev. 73: 712–729.
(accessed 6 June 2019). Zengler, K., Toledo, G., Rappé, M., et al. (2002) Cultivating the uncul­
Moniz, R. & Coley, K. (2017) Challenges in the deep: The role of manned tured. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 15681–15686.
submersibles in an autonomous age. Online at https://www.oceannews. Bourne, D.G. & Munn, C.B. (2005) Diversity of bacteria associated with
com/featured-stories/challenges-in-the-deep-the-role-of-manned-sub­ the coral Pocillopora damicornis from the Great Barrier Reef. Environ.
mersibles-in-an-autonomous-age (accessed 6 June 2019). Microbiol. 7: 1162–1174.
Rahlff, J., Stolle, C., Wurl, O., et al. (2017) SISI: A new device for in situ Compeau, P.E., Pevzner, P.A., & Tesler, G. (2011) Why are de Bruijn
incubations at the ocean surface. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 5: 46. graphs useful for genome assembly?. Nat. Biotechnol. 29: 987.
Amann, R. & Fuchs, B.M. (2008) Single-cell identification in microbial Coutinho, F.H., Gregoracci, G.B., Walter, J.M., et al. (2018) Metagenomics
communities by improved fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques. sheds light on the ecology of marine microbes and their viruses. Trends
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6: 339–348. Microbiol. 26: 955–965.
Chisholm, S.W., Olson, R.J., Zettler, E.R., et al. (1988) A novel free-living Escobar-Zepeda, A., Vera-Ponce de León, A., & Sanchez-Flores, A.
prochlorophyte abundant in the oceanic euphotic zone. Nature 334: 340. (2015) The road to metagenomics: From microbiology to DNA sequenc­
Johns, C.T., Nissimov, J.I., Grubb, A., et al. (2019) The mutual interplay ing technologies and bioinformatics. Front. Genet. 6: 348.
between calcification and coccolithovirus infection. Environ. Microbiol. Giovannoni, S.J., Britschgi, T.B., Moyer, C.L., & Field, K.G. (1990)
21: 1896–1915. Genetic diversity in Sargasso Sea bacterioplankton. Nature 345: 60–63.
Malfatti, F. & Azam, F. (2009) Atomic force microscopy reveals Heather, J.M. & Chain, B. (2016) The sequence of sequencers: The his­
microscale networks and possible symbioses among pelagic marine bac­ tory of sequencing DNA. Genomics 107: 1–8.
teria. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 58: 1–14.
Hiraoka, S., Yang, C. & Iwasaki, W. (2016) Metagenomics and bioin­
Partensky, F. & Garczarek, L. (2010) Prochlorococcus: Advantages and formatics in microbial ecology: Current status and beyond. Microbes
limits of minimalism. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2: 305–331. Environ. 31: 204.
Pennisi, E. (2017) Meet the obscure microbe that influences climate, Hongoh, Y. & Toyoda, A. (2011) Whole-genome sequencing of uncultur­
ocean ecosystems, and perhaps even evolution. Science. doi: 10.1126/sci­ able bacterium using whole-genome amplification. Methods Mol. Biol.
ence.aal0873. 733: 25–33.
Button, D.K., Schut, F., Quang, P., et al. (1993) Viability and isolation Hugerth, L.W. & Andersson, A.F. (2017) Analysing microbial community
of marine bacteria by dilution culture: Theory, procedures and initial composition through amplicon sequencing: From sampling to hypothesis
results. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 881–891. testing. Front. Microbiol. 8: 1561.
Carini, P. (2019) A “cultural” renaissance: Genomics breathes new life Kim, M., Lee, K.-H., Yoon, S.-W., et al. (2013) Analytical tools and data­
into an old craft. mSystems 4: e00092-19. bases for metagenomics in the next-generation sequencing era. Genom.
Connon, S.A. & Giovannoni, S.J. (2002) High-throughput methods for Inform. 11: 102.
culturing microorganisms in very low-nutrient media yield diverse new Kozińska, A., Seweryn, P., & Sitkiewicz, I. (2019) A crash course in
marine isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 3878–3885. sequencing for a microbiologist. J. Appl. Genet. 60: 103–111.
Donachie, S.P., Foster, J.S., & Brown, M. V (2007) Culture clash: Land, M., Hauser, L., Jun, S.-R., et al. (2015) Insights from 20 years of
Challenging the dogma of microbial diversity—Commentaries. ISME J. bacterial genome sequencing. Funct. Integr. Genom. 15: 141–61.
1: 97–99.
Logares, R., Sunagawa, S., Salazar, G., et al. (2014) Metagenomic 16S
Giovannoni, S.J., Foster, R.A., Rappé, M.S. & Epstein, S. (2007) New rDNA Illumina tags are a powerful alternative to amplicon sequencing
cultivation strategies bring more microbial plankton species into the labo­ to explore diversity and structure of microbial communities. Environ.
ratory. Oceanography 20: 62–69. Microbiol. 16: 2659–71.
Giovannoni, S. & Stingl, U. (2007) The importance of culturing bacterio­ Pedros-Alio, C., Acinas, S.G., Logares, R., & Massana, R. (2018) Marine
plankton in the ‘omics’ age. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5: 820–825. microbial diversity as seen by high-throughput sequencing. In, Microbial
Giovannoni, S.J., Tripp, H.J., Givan, S., et al. (2005) Genetics: Genome Ecology of the Oceans, Third edition., J.M. Gasol & D.L. Kirchman, eds.,
streamlining in a cosmopolitan oceanic bacterium. Science 309: pp. 47–97. John Wiley & Sons.
1242–1245. Rhoads, A. & Au, K.F. (2015) PacBio sequencing and its applications.
Morris, R.M., Rappe, M.S., Connon, S.A., et al. (2002) SAR11 clade Genom. Proteom. Bioinf. 13: 278–289.
dominates ocean surface bacterioplankton communities. Nature 420: Roh, S.W., Abell, G.C.J., Kim, K.-H., et al. (2010) Comparing microar­
806–810. rays and next-generation sequencing technologies for microbial ecology
Rappé, M.S., Connon, S.A., Vergin, K.L. & Giovannoni, S.J. (2002) research. Trends Biotechnol. 28: 291–9.
Cultivation of the ubiquitous SAR11 marine bacterioplankton clade. Salazar, G. & Sunagawa, S. (2017) Marine microbial diversity. Curr. Biol.
Nature 418: 630–632. 27: R489–R494.
Schut, F., Gottschal, J.C. & Prins, R.A. (1997) Isolation and characterisa­ Singer, E., Wagner, M., & Woyke, T. (2017) Capturing the genetic makeup
tion of the marine ultramicrobacterium Sphingomonas sp. strain RB2256. of the active microbiome in situ. ISME J. 11: 1949–1963.
FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 20: 363–369.
Sleigh, C. (2013) The secret life of the laboratory: PCR at 30. The
Guardian. Online at https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/nov/26/
the-secret-life-of-the-laboratory-pcr-at-30 (accessed 7 June 2019).
32 References

Stepanauskas, R. (2012) Single cell genomics: An individual look at Ernst, O.P., Lodowski, D.T., Elstner, M. et al. (2014) Microbial and ani­
microbes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 15: 613–620. mal rhodopsins: structures, functions, and molecular mechanisms. Chem.
Rev. 114: 126–163.
Thomas, T., Gilbert, J., & Meyer, F. (2012) Metagenomics—A guide from
sampling to data analysis. Microb. Inform. Exp. 2: 3. Finkel, O.M., Béjà, O., and Belkin, S. (2013) Global abundance of micro­
bial rhodopsins. ISME J. 7: 448–51.
Thompson, L.R., Sanders, J.G., McDonald, D., et al. (2017) A com­
munal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature, Frigaard, N.U., Martinez, A., Mincer, T.J. et al. (2006) Proteorhodopsin
551(7681): 457. lateral gene transfer between marine planktonic Bacteria and Archaea.
Nature 439: 847–850.
Warwick-Dugdale, J., Solonenko, N., Moore, K., et al. (2019) Long-read
viral metagenomics captures abundant and microdiverse viral popula­ Giovannoni, S.J., Bibbs, L., Cho, J.C. et al. (2005) Proteorhodopsin in the
tions and their niche-defining genomic islands. PeerJ 7: e6800. ubiquitous marine bacterium SAR11. Nature 438: 82–85.
Boughner, L.A. & Singh, P. (2016) Microbial ecology: Where are we Gómez-Consarnau, L., Akram, N., Lindell, K., et al. (2010)
now? Postdoc. J. 4: 3–17. Proteorhodopsin phototrophy promotes survival of marine bacteria dur­
ing starvation. PLoS Biol. 8: e1000358.
Morando, M. & Capone, D.G. (2016) Intraclade heterogeneity in nitrogen
utilization by marine prokaryotes revealed using stable isotope probing Gomez-Consarnau, L., Gonzalez, J.M., Coll-Llado, M. et al. (2007) Light
coupled with tag sequencing (Tag-SIP). Front. Microbiol. 7: 1932. stimulates growth of proteorhodopsin-containing marine Flavobacteria.
Nature 445: 210–213.
Musat, N., Musat, F., Weber, P.K., & Pett-Ridge, J. (2016) Tracking micro­
bial interactions with NanoSIMS. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 41: 114–121. Graham, E.D., Heidelberg, J.F., and Tully, B.J. (2018) Potential for pri­
mary productivity in a globally-distributed bacterial phototroph. ISME
Nagy, K., Ábrahám, Á., Keymer, J.E., & Galajda, P. (2018) Application of
J. 12: 1861–1866.
microfluidics in experimental ecology: The importance of being spatial.
Front. Microbiol. 9: 496. Inoue, K., Kato, Y., and Kandori, H. (2015) Light-driven ion-translocat­
ing rhodopsins in marine bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 23: 91–98.
Radajewski, S., Ineson, P., Parekh, N.R., & Murrell, J.C. (2000) Stable-
isotope probing as a tool in microbial ecology. Nature 403: 646. Kumagai, Y., Yoshizawa, S., Nakajima, Y. et al. (2018) Solar-panel and
parasol strategies shape the proteorhodopsin distribution pattern in
Rusconi, R., Garren, M., & Stocker, R. (2014) Microfluidics expanding
marine Flavobacteriia. ISME J. 12: 1329–1343.
the frontiers of microbial ecology. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 43: 65–91.
McCarren, J., and DeLong, E.F. (2007) Proteorhodopsin photosystem
Rusconi, R. & Stocker, R. (2015) Microbes in flow. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.
gene clusters exhibit co-evolutionary trends and shared ancestry among
25: 1–8.
diverse marine microbial phyla. Environ. Microbiol. 9: 846–858.
Staley, J.T. & Konopka, A. (1985) Measurement of in Situ activities of
Moran, M.A., and Miller, W.L. (2007) Resourceful heterotrophs make
nonphotosynthetic microorganisms in aquatic and terrestrial habitats.
the most of light in the coastal ocean. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5: 792–800.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 39: 321–346.
Pinhassi, J., DeLong, E.F., Béjà, O. et al. (2016) Marine bacterial and
Taylor, G.T. (2019) Windows into microbial seascapes: Advances in
archaeal ion-pumping rhodopsins: genetic diversity, physiology, and ecol­
nanoscale imaging and application to marine sciences. Ann. Rev. Mar.
ogy. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80: 929–954.
Sci. 11: 465–490.
Sharma, A.K., Spudich, J.L., and Doolittle, W.F. (2006) Microbial rho­
Tu, Q., Yu, H., He, Z., et al. (2014) GeoChip 4: A functional gene-array­
dopsins: functional versatility and genetic mobility. Trends Microbiol. 14:
based high-throughput environmental technology for microbial commu­
463–469.
nity analysis. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14: 914–928.
Sieradzki, E.T., Fuhrman, J.A., Rivero-Calle, S. et al. (2018)
Zark, M., Broda, N.K., Hornick, T., et al. (2017) Ocean acidification
Proteorhodopsins dominate the expression of phototrophic mechanisms
experiments in large-scale mesocosms reveal similar dynamics of dis­
in seasonal and dynamic marine picoplankton communities. PeerJ 6:
solved organic matter production and biotransformation. Front. Mar. Sci.
e5798.
4: 271.
Steindler, L., Schwalbach, M.S., Smith, D.P. et al. (2011) Energy starved
Miller, S.D., Haddock, S.H.D., Elvidge, C.D. & Lee, T.F. (2005) Detection
Candidatus Pelagibacter ubique substitutes light-mediated ATP produc­
of a bioluminescent milky sea from space. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102:
tion for endogenous carbon respiration. PLoS One 6: e19725.
14181–14184.
Wang, Z., O’Shaughnessy, T.J., Soto, C.M. et al. (2012) Function and reg­
Nealson, K.H. & Hastings, J.W. (2006) Quorum sensing on a global scale:
ulation of Vibrio campbellii proteorhodopsin: acquired phototrophy in a
Massive numbers of bioluminescent bacteria make milky seas. Appl.
classical organoheterotroph. PLoS One 7: e38749.
Environ. Microbiol. 72: 2295–2297.
Casciotti, K.L., and Buchwald, C. (2012) Insights on the marine microbial
Béjà, O., Aravind, L., Koonin, E. V. et al. (2000) Bacterial rhodopsin: evi­
nitrogen cycle from isotopic approaches to nitrification. Front. Microbiol.
dence for a new type of phototrophy in the sea. Science 289: 1902–1906.
3: 00356
Beja, O., Spudich, E.N., Spudich, J.L. et al. (2001) Proteorhodopsin pho­
Dekas, A.E., Fike, D.A., Chadwick, G.L. et al. (2018) Widespread nitro­
totrophy in the ocean. Nature 411: 786–789.
gen fixation in sediments from diverse deep‐sea sites of elevated carbon
Broda, E. (1977) Two kinds of lithotrophs missing in nature. Z. Allg. loading. Environ. Microbiol. 20: 4281–4296.
Mikrobiol. 17: 491–493.
Dekas, A.E., Poretsky, R.S., and Orphan, V.J. (2009) Deep-sea archaea
Bryant, D.A., and Frigaard, N.U. (2006) Prokaryotic photosynthesis and fix and share nitrogen in methane-consuming microbial consortia.
phototrophy illuminated. Trends Microbiol. 14: 488–496. Science 326: 422–426.
Dubinsky, V., Haber, M., Burgsdorf, I. et al. (2017) Metagenomic analy­ DeLong, E.F. (2002) All in the packaging. Nature 419: 676–677.
sis reveals unusually high incidence of proteorhodopsin genes in the
Kuenen, J.G. (2008) Anammox bacteria: from discovery to application.
ultraoligotrophic Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Environ. Microbiol. 19:
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6: 320–326.
1077–1090.
Pereira, A.D., Cabezas, A., Etchebehere, C. et al. (2017) Microbial com­
munities in anammox reactors: a review. Environ. Technol. Rev. 6: 74–93.
References 33

Stahl, D.A., and de la Torre, J.R. (2012) Physiology and diversity of Croft, M.T., Warren, M.J., and Smith, A.G. (2006) Algae need their vita­
ammonia-oxidizing Archaea. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 66: 83–101. mins. Eukaryot. Cell 5: 1175–1183.
Barton, L.L., and Fauque, G.D. (2009) Biochemistry, physiology and bio­ Decho, A.W., and Gutierrez, T. (2017) Microbial extracellular polymeric
technology of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 68: 41–98. substances (EPSs) in ocean systems. Front. Microbiol. 8: 922.
Liu, Y., Beer, L.L., and Whitman, W.B. (2012b) Sulfur metabolism in Johnstone, T.C., and Nolan, E.M. (2015) Beyond iron: non-classical bio­
archaea reveals novel processes. Environ. Microbiol. 14: 2632–2644. logical functions of bacterial siderophores. Dalt. Trans. 44: 6320–6339.
Lovley, D.R. (2017) Happy together: microbial communities that hook up Kiørboe, T. (2003) Marine snow microbial communities: scaling of abun­
to swap electrons. ISME J. 11: 327–336. dances with aggregate size. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 33: 67–75.
Muyzer, G., and Stams, A.J.M. (2008) The ecology and biotechnology of Kiørboe, T., and Jackson, G.A. (2001) Marine snow, organic solute plumes,
sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6: 441–454. and optimal chemosensory behavior of bacteria. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46:
1309–1318.
Muyzer, G., Yildirim, E., van Dongen, U. et al. (2005) Identification of
“Candidatus Thioturbo danicus,” a microaerophilic bacterium that builds Koch, A.L. (2001) Oligotrophs versus copiotrophs. BioEssays 23:
conspicuous veils on sulfidic sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 657–661.
8929–8933. Lauro, F.M., McDougald, D., Thomas, T. et al. (2009) The genomic
Rückert, C. (2016) Sulfate reduction in microorganisms—recent advances basis of trophic strategy in marine bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106:
and biotechnological applications. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 33: 140–146. 15527–15533.
Thar, R., and Kuhil, M. (2002) Conspicuous veils formed by vibrioid Lipson, D.A. (2015) The complex relationship between microbial growth
bacteria on sulfidic marine sediment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: rate and yield and its implications for ecosystem processes. Front.
6310–6320. Microbiol. 6: 615.
Wasmund, K., Mußmann, M., and Loy, A. (2017) The life sulfuric: micro­ Long, R.A., and Azam, F. (2001) Antagonistic interactions among marine
bial ecology of sulfur cycling in marine sediments. Environ. Microbiol. pelagic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 4975–4983.
Rep. 9: 323–344. Mühlenbruch, M., Grossart, H.-P., Eigemann, F. et al. (2018) Mini-review:
Boetius, A., Ravenschlag, K., Schubert, C.J. et al. (2000) A marine micro­ Phytoplankton-derived polysaccharides in the marine environment and
bial consortium apparently mediating anaerobic oxidation of methane. their interactions with heterotrophic bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 20:
Nature 407: 623–626. 2671–2685.
Born, D.A., Ulrich, E.C., Ju, K.-S. et al. (2017) Structural basis for meth­ Paerl, R.W., Bouget, F.-Y., Lozano, J.-C. et al. (2017) Use of plankton-
ylphosphonate biosynthesis. Science 358: 1336–1339. derived vitamin B1 precursors, especially thiazole-related precursor, by
key marine picoeukaryotic phytoplankton. ISME J. 11: 753–765.
Carini, P., White, A.E., Campbell, E.O. et al. (2014) Methane production
by phosphate-starved SAR11 chemoheterotrophic marine bacteria. Nat. Reintjes, G., Arnosti, C., Fuchs, B.M. et al. (2017) An alternative polysac­
Commun. 5: 4346. charide uptake mechanism of marine bacteria. ISME J. 11: 1640–1650.
Chistoserdova, L., and Kalyuzhnaya, M.G. (2018) Current trends in meth­ Schönheit, P., Buckel, W., and Martin, W.F. (2016) On the origin of heter­
ylotrophy. Trends Microbiol. 26: 703–714. otrophy. Trends Microbiol. 24: 12–25.
Cui, M., Ma, A., Qi, H. et al. (2015) Anaerobic oxidation of methane: an Sowell, S.M., Wilhelm, L.J., Norbeck, A.D. et al. (2009) Transport func­
“active” microbial process. Microbiol. Open 4: 1–11. tions dominate the SAR11 metaproteome at low-nutrient extremes in the
Sargasso Sea. ISME J. 3: 93–105.
DeLong, E.F. (2000) Resolving a methane mystery. Nature 407: 577–579.
Stoecker, D.K., Hansen, P.J., Caron, D.A. et al. (2017) Mixotrophy in the
Karl, D.M., Beversdorf, L., Björkman, K.M. et al. (2008) Aerobic produc­
marine plankton. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 9: 311–335.
tion of methane in the sea. Nat. Geosci. 1: 473–478.
Suffridge, C.P., Gómez-Consarnau, L., Monteverde, D.R. et al. (2018) B
Lever, M.A. (2016) A new era of methanogenesis research. Trends
Vitamins and their congeners as potential drivers of microbial commu­
Microbiol. 24: 84–86.
nity composition in an oligotrophic marine ecosystem. J. Geophys. Res.
Liu, Y., Beer, L.L., and Whitman, W.B. (2012a) Methanogens: a window Biogeosciences 123: 2890–2907.
into ancient sulfur metabolism. Trends Microbiol. 20: 251–258.
Tang, K., Jiao, N., Liu, K. et al. (2012) Distribution and functions of TonB­
Repeta, D.J., Ferrón, S., Sosa, O.A. et al. (2016) Marine methane para­ dependent transporters in marine bacteria and environments: implica­
dox explained by bacterial degradation of dissolved organic matter. Nat. tions for dissolved organic matter utilization. PLoS One 7: e41204.
Geosci. 9: 884–887.
Traving, S.J., Thygesen, U.H., Riemann, L. et al. (2015) A model of extra­
Sun, J., Steindler, L., Thrash, J.C. et al. (2011) One carbon metabolism in cellular enzymes in free-living microbes: which strategy pays off? Appl.
SAR11 pelagic marine bacteria. PLoS One 6: e23973. Environ. Microbiol. 81: 7385–7393.
Valentine, D.L., and Reeburgh, W.S. (2000) New perspectives on anaero­ Barbara, G.M., and Mitchell, J.G. (2003) Bacterial tracking of motile
bic methane oxidation. Environ. Microbiol. 2: 477–484. algae. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 44: 79–87.
Yan, Z., Joshi, P., Gorski, C.A. et al. (2018) A biochemical framework for Barbara, G.M., and Mitchell, J.G. (2003) Marine bacterial organisation
anaerobic oxidation of methane driven by Fe(III)-dependent respiration. around point-like sources of amino acids. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 43:
Nat. Commun. 9: 1642. 99–109.
Adam, N., and Perner, M. (2018) Microbially mediated hydrogen cycling Belas, R. (2014) Biofilms, flagella, and mechanosensing of surfaces by
in deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Front. Microbiol. 9: 02873. bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 22: 517–527.
Bergauer, K., Fernandez-Guerra, A., Garcia, J.A.L. et al. (2018) Organic Fernandez, V.I., Yawata, Y., and Stocker, R. (2019) A foraging mandala
matter processing by microbial communities throughout the Atlantic for aquatic microorganisms. ISME J. 13: 563–575.
water column as revealed by metaproteomics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115:
Guttenplan, S.B., and Kearns, D.B. (2013) Regulation of flagellar motility
E400–E408.
during biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37: 849–871.
34 References

Johansen, J., Pinhassi, J., Blackburn, N. et al. (2002) Variability in motil­ Krupke, A., Hmelo, L.R., Ossolinski, J.E. et al. (2016) Quorum sens­
ity characteristics among marine bacteria. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 28: ing plays a complex role in regulating the enzyme hydrolysis activity of
229–237. microbes associated with sinking particles in the ocean. Front. Mar. Sci.
1: 55.
McCarter, L. (1999) The multiple identities of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.
J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1: 51–57. Matz, C., Webb, J.S., Schupp, P.J. et al. (2008) Marine biofilm bacteria
evade eukaryotic predation by targeted chemical defense. PLoS One 3:
Minamino, T., and Imada, K. (2015). The bacterial flagellar motor and its
e2744.
structural diversity. TrendsMicrobiol 23: 267–274.
Platt, T.G., and Fuqua, C. (2010) What’s in a name? The semantics of
Mitchell, J.G., and Barbara, G.M. (1999) High speed marine bacteria use
quorum sensing. Trends Microbiol. 18: 383–387.
sodium-ion and proton driven motors. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 18: 227–233.
Redfield, R.J. (2002) Is quorum sensing a side effect of diffusion sensing?
Mitchell, J.G., Pearson, L., and Dillon, S. (1996) Clustering of marine bac­
Trends Microbiol. 10: 365–370.
teria in seawater enrichments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62: 3716–3721.
Tait, K., and Havenhand, J. (2013) Investigating a possible role for the
Mitchell, J.G., Pearson, L., Dillon, S. et al. (1995) Natural assemblages of
bacterial signal molecules N-acylhomoserine lactones in Balanus impro­
marine-bacteria exhibiting high-speed motility and large accelerations.
visus cyprid settlement. Mol. Ecol. 22: 2588–2602.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 4436–4440.
Tait, K., Joint, I., Daykin, M. et al. (2005) Disruption of quorum sensing
Muramoto, K., Kawagishi, I., Kudo, S. et al. (1995) High-speed rotation
in seawater abolishes attraction of zoospores of the green alga Ulva to
and speed stability of the sodium-driven flagellar motor in Vibrio algino­
bacterial biofilms. Environ. Microbiol. 7: 229–240.
lyticus. J. Mol. Biol. 251: 50–58.
Ventura, R. (2019) Multicellular individuality: the case of bacteria. Biol.
Pallen, M.J., Penn, C.W., and Chaudhuri, R.R. (2005) Bacterial flagellar
Theory: doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00317-7.
diversity in the post-genomic era. Trends Microbiol. 13: 143–149.
Wheeler, G.L., Tait, K., Taylor, A. et al. (2006) Acyl-homoserine lac­
Rusconi, R., Garren, M., and Stocker, R. (2014) Microfluidics expanding
tones modulate the settlement rate of zoospores of the marine alga Ulva
the frontiers of microbial ecology. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 43: 65–91.
intestinalis via a novel chemokinetic mechanism. Plant, Cell Environ.
Schuergers, N., Lenn, T., Kampmann, R. et al. (2016) Cyanobacteria use 29: 608–618.
micro-optics to sense light direction. Elife 5: e12620.
Bloomfield, S.F., Stewart, G.S.A.B., Dodd, C.E.R. et al. (1998) The viable
Son, K., Guasto, J.S., and Stocker, R. (2013) Bacteria can exploit a flagel­ but non-culturable phenomenon explained? Microbiology 144: 1–3.
lar buckling instability to change direction. Nat. Phys. 9: 494–498.
Oliver, J.D. (2005) The viable but nonculturable state in bacteria. J.
Son, K., Menolascina, F., and Stocker, R. (2016) Speed-dependent che­ Microbiol. 43: 93–100.
motactic precision in marine bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113:
Chénard, C., and Lauro, F.M. eds. (2017) Microbial Ecology of Extreme
8624–8629.
Environments. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Stocker, R. (2011) Reverse and flick: Hybrid locomotion in bacteria. Proc.
Counts, J.A., Zeldes, B.M., Lee, L.L. et al. (2017) Physiological, meta­
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 2635–2636.
bolic and biotechnological features of extremely thermophilic microor­
Stocker, R. (2012) Marine microbes see a sea of gradients. Science 338: ganisms. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 9: e1377.
628–633.
Czyz, A., and Wegrzyn, G. (2001) On the function and evolution of bacte­
Stocker, R., Seymour, J.R., Samadani, A. et al. (2008) Rapid chemotactic rial luminescence. In: Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence (ed. J.
response enables marine bacteria to exploit ephemeral microscale nutri­ F. Case, P. J. Herring, B. H. Robinson, S. D. H. Haddock, L. J. Kricka and
ent patches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 4209–4214. P. E. Stanley). World Science Publishing Company, Singapore, pp. 31–34.
Wilde, A., and Mullineaux, C.W. (2017) Light-controlled motility in Czyz, A., Wrobel, B., and Wegrzyn, G. (2000) Vibrio harveyi biolumi­
prokaryotes and the problem of directional light perception. FEMS nescence plays a role in stimulation of DNA repair. Microbiology 146:
Microbiol. Rev. 41: 900–922. 283–288.
Xie, L., Altindal, T., Chattopadhyay, S. et al. (2011) Bacterial flagellum Durvasula, R., and Subba Rao, D. V. (2018) Extremophiles: From Biology
as a propeller and as a rudder for efficient chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. to Biotechnology. CRC Press.
Sci. USA 108: 2246–2251.
Fang, J., Zhang, L., and Bazylinski, D.A. (2010) Deep-sea piezosphere and
Alberghini, S., Polone, E., Corich, V. et al. (2009) Consequences of rela­ piezophiles: geomicrobiology and biogeochemistry. Trends Microbiol.
tive cellular positioning on quorum sensing and bacterial cell-to-cell 18: 413–422.
communication. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 292: 149–161.
Haddock, S.d., Moline, M.A., and Case, J.F. (2010) Bioluminescence in
Antunes, J., Leão, P., and Vasconcelos, V. (2018) Marine biofilms: diver­ the sea. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2: 443–449.
sity of communities and of chemical cues. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. doi:
Harrison, J.P., Gheeraert, N., Tsigelnitskiy, D. et al. (2013) The limits for
10.1111/1758-2229.12694.
life under multiple extremes. Trends Microbiol. 21: 204–212.
Dunny, G.M., Brickman, T.J., and Dworkin, M. (2008) Multicellular
Huber, H., and Stetter, K.O. (1998) Hyperthermophiles and their possible
behavior in bacteria: communication, cooperation, competition and
potential in biotechnology. J. Biotechnol. 64: 39–52.
cheating. Bioessays 30: 296–298.
Kashefi, K., and Lovley, D.R. (2003) Extending the upper temperature
Hense, B.A., Kuttler, C., Müller, J. et al. (2007) Does efficiency sensing
limit for life. Science 301: 934.
unify diffusion and quorum sensing? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5: 230–239.
Kunzig, R. (2000) Mapping the Deep: The Extraordinary Story of Ocean
Hmelo, L.R. (2017) Quorum sensing in marine microbial environments.
Science. W.W. Norton & Co.
Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 9: 257–281.
Martin, A., and McMinn, A. (2018) Sea ice, extremophiles and life on
Hmelo, L.R., Mincer, T.J., and Van Mooy, B.A.S. (2011) Possible influ­
extra-terrestrial ocean worlds. Int. J. Astrobiol. 17: 1–16.
ence of bacterial quorum sensing on the hydrolysis of sinking particu­
late organic carbon in marine environments. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. Marx, J.-C., Collins, T., D’Amico, S. et al. (2007) Cold-adapted enzymes
3: 682–688. from marine Antarctic microorganisms. Mar. Biotechnol. 9: 293–304.
References 35

Oger, P.M., and Jebbar, M. (2010) The many ways of coping with pres­ Parks, D.H., Chuvochina, M., Waite, D.W. et al. (2018) A standardized
sure. Res. Microbiol. 161: 799–809. bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the
tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol. 36: 996.
Phadtare, S. (2004) Recent developments in bacterial cold-shock response.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 6: 125–136. Pedros-Alio, C., Acinas, S.G., Logares, R. et al. (2018). Marine micro­
bial diversity as seen by hight-throughput sequencing. In: Gasol, J.M. and
Poli, A., Finore, I., Romano, I. et al. (2017) Microbial diversity in extreme
Kirchman, D.L. (eds.) Microbial Ecology of the Oceans. John Wiley &
marine habitats and their biomolecules. Microorganisms 5: 25.
Sons, pp. 47–98.
Rees, J. F., De Wergifosse, B., Noiset, O. et al. (1998) The origins of
Richter, M., and Rosselló-Móra, R. (2009) Shifting the genomic gold
marine bioluminescence: turning oxygen defence mechanisms into deep-
standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
sea communication tools. J. Exp. Biol. 201: 1211–1221.
USA 106: 19126–19131.
Siezen, R.J. (2011) Microbial sunscreens. Microb. Biotechnol. 4: 1–7.
Salazar, G., and Sunagawa, S. (2017a) Marine microbial diversity. Curr.
Tribelli, P., López, N., Tribelli, P.M. et al. (2018) Reporting key features Biol. 27: R489–R494.
in cold-adapted bacteria. Life 8: 8.
Schleifer, K.H. (2009) Classification of Bacteria and Archaea: Past, pres­
Vezzi, A., Campanaro, S., D’Angelo, M. et al. (2005) Life at depth: ent and future. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 32: 533–542.
Photobacterium profundum genome sequence and expression analysis.
Schloss, P.D., Girard, R.A., Martin, T. et al. (2016) Status of the archaeal
Science 307: 1459–1461.
and bacterial census: an update. MBio 7: e00201–e00216.
Zeng, X., Birrien, J.-L., Fouquet, Y. et al. (2009) Pyrococcus CH1, an
Schulz, F., Eloe-Fadrosh, E.A., Bowers, R.M. et al. (2017) Towards a bal­
obligate piezophilic hyperthermophile: extending the upper pressure-
anced view of the bacterial tree of life. Microbiome 5: 140.
temperature limits for life. ISME J. 3: 873–876.
Sogin, M.L., Morrison, H.G., Huber, J.A. et al. (2008) Microbial diversity
Zhang, Y., Li, X., Bartlett, D.H., and Xiao, X. (2015) Current develop­
in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere.” Proc. Natl. Acad.
ments in marine microbiology: high-pressure biotechnology and the
Sci. 103: 12115–12120.
genetic engineering of piezophiles. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 33: 157–164.
Stackebrandt, E., and Ebers, J. (2006) Taxonomic parameters revisited:
Achtman, M., and Wagner, M. (2008) Microbial diversity and the genetic
tarnished gold standards. Microbiol. Today 33:152–155.
nature of microbial species. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6: 431–440.
Waite, D.W., Vanwonterghem, I., Rinke, C. et al. (2017) Comparative
Amann, R., and Rosselló-Móra, R. (2016) After all, only millions? MBio
genomic analysis of the class Epsilonproteobacteria and proposed reclas­
7: e00999–e00916.
sification to Epsilonbacteraeota (phyl. nov.). Front. Microbiol. 8: 682.
Amaral-Zettler, L., Artigas, L.F., Baross, J., et al. (2010). A global
Whitman, W.B., Coleman, D.C., Wiebe, W.J. et al. (1998) Prokaryotes:
census of marine microbes, In: Life in the World’s Oceans. Diversity,
the unseen majority. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 6578–6583.
Distribution, and Abundance. McIntyre, A.D. (ed.) Wiley-Blackwell, pp.
223–246. Willis, A. (2016) Extrapolating abundance curves has no predictive
power for estimating microbial biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
Bergey’s Manual Trust (N.D) Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea
113: E5096.
and Bacteria. Wiley Online Library; available at https://onlinelibrary.
wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118960608. Accessed 23 April 2019. Winter, C., Bouvier, T., Weinbauer, M.G. et al. (2010) Trade-offs between
competition and defense specialists among unicellular planktonic organ­
Callahan, B.J., McMurdie, P.J., and Holmes, S.P. (2017) Exact sequence
isms: the “killing the winner” hypothesis revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol.
variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data
Rev. 74: 42–57.
analysis. ISME J. 11: 2639.
Yarza, P., Yilmaz, P., Pruesse, E. et al. (2014) Uniting the classification
Castelle, C.J., and Banfield, J.F. (2018) Major new microbial groups
of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene
expand diversity and alter our understanding of the tree of life. Cell 172:
sequences. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12: 635–645.
1181–1197.
Yilmaz, P., Yarza, P., Rapp, J.Z. et al. (2016) Expanding the world of
Chun, J., Oren, A., Ventosa, A. et al. (2019) Proposed minimal standards
marine bacterial and archaeal clades. Front. Microbiol. 6: 1524.
for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst.
Evol. Microbiol 68: 461–466. Ferla, M.P., Thrash, J.C., Giovannoni, S.J. et al. (2013) New rRNA gene-
based phylogenies of the Alphaproteobacteria provide perspective on
Curtis, T.P., Sloan, W.T., and Scannell, J.W. (2002) Estimating prokaryotic
major groups, mitochondrial ancestry and phylogenetic instability. PLoS
diversity and its limits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99: 10494–10499.
One 8: e83383.
Garrity, G.M. (2016) A new genomics-driven taxonomy of Bacteria and
Giovannoni, S.J., Hayakawa, D.H., Tripp, H.J. et al. (2008) The small
Archaea: are We There Yet? J. Clin. Microbiol. 54: 1956–1963.
genome of an abundant coastal ocean methylotroph. Environ. Microbiol.
Hug, L.A., Baker, B.J., Anantharaman, K. et al. (2016) A new view of the 10: 1771–1782.
tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 1: 16048.
Greene, S.E., Brilli, M., Biondi, E.G. et al. (2012) Analysis of the CtrA
Jousset, A., Bienhold, C., Chatzinotas, A. et al. (2017) Where less may pathway in Magnetospirillum reveals an ancestral role in motility in alp­
be more: how the rare biosphere pulls ecosystems strings. ISME J. 11: haproteobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 194: 2973–2986.
853–862.
Hughes, V., Jiang, C., and Brun, Y. (2012) Caulobacter crescentus. Curr.
Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, and Amann R. (2017) Uncultivated Biol. 22: R507–R509.
microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J. 11: 2399–2406.
Komeili, A., Vali, H., Beveridge, T.J. et al. (2004) Magnetosome vesicles
Kunin, V., Engelbrektson, A., Ochman, H. et al. (2010) Wrinkles in the are present before magnetite formation, and MamA is required for their
rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 3839–3844.
diversity estimates. Environ. Microbiol. 12: 118–123.
Kolinko, S., Richter, M., Glöckner, F.O. et al. (2016). Single‐cell genom­
Locey, K.J., and Lennon, J.T. (2016) Scaling laws predict global microbial ics of uncultivated deep‐branching magnetotactic bacteria reveals a con­
diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113: 5970–5975. served set of magnetosome genes. Environ. Microbiol.18: 21–37.
Louca, S., Mazel, F., Doebeli, M. et al. (2019) A census-based estimate of
Earth’s bacterial and archaeal diversity. PLOS Biol. 17: e3000106.
36 References

Lin, W., Zhang, W., Zhao, X. et al. (2018). Genomic expansion of mag­ Martin, B.C., Bougoure, J., Ryan, M.H. et al. (2019) Oxygen loss from
netotactic bacteria reveals an early common origin of magnetotaxis with seagrass roots coincides with colonisation of sulphide-oxidising cable
lineage-specific evolution. ISME J. 12: 1508. bacteria and reduces sulphide stress. ISME J. 13: 707–719.
Luo, H., and Moran, M.A. (2014) Evolutionary ecology of the marine Marzocchi, U., Trojan, D., Larsen, S. et al. (2014) Electric coupling
Roseobacter clade. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78: 573–587. between distant nitrate reduction and sulfide oxidation in marine sedi­
ment. ISME J. 8: 1682–1690.
Martins, J.L., Silveira, T.S., Abreu, F. et al. (2007). Grazing protozoa and
magnetosome dissolution in magnetotactic bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. Meysman, F.J.R. (2018) Cable bacteria take a new breath using long-dis­
9: 2775–2781. tance electricity. Trends Microbiol. 26: 411–422.
Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E.F., Lory, S. et al. (eds.) (2014) The Prokaryotes. Nielsen, L.P. (2016) Ecology: Electrical cable bacteria save marine life.
Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria. Springer Berlin, Curr. Biol. 26: R32–R33.
Heidelberg. Nielsen, L.P., Risgaard-Petersen, N., Fossing, H. et al. (2010) Electric
Scheffel, A., Gruska, M., Faivre, D. et al. (2006) An acidic protein aligns currents couple spatially separated biogeochemical processes in marine
magnetosomes along a filamentous structure in magnetotactic bacteria. sediment. Nature 463: 1071–1074.
Nature 440: 110–114. Pfeffer, C., Larsen, S., Song, J. et al. (2012) Filamentous bacteria trans­
Silva, K.T., Abreu, F., Keim, C.N. et al. (2008) Ultrastructure and cyto­ port electrons over centimetre distances. Nature 491: 218–221.
chemistry of lipid granules in the many-celled magnetotactic prokaryote, Plugge, C.M., Zhang, W., Scholten, J.C.M.. et al. (2011) Metabolic flex­
‘Candidatus Magnetoglobus multicellularis.’ Micron 39: 1387–1392. ibility of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2: 81.
Taoka, A., Kiyokawa, A., Uesugi, C. et al. (2017) Tethered magnets are Risgaard-Petersen, N., Damgaard, L.R., Revil, A. et al. (2014) Mapping
the key to magnetotaxis: direct observations of Magnetospirillum mag­ electron sources and sinks in a marine biogeobattery. J. Geophys. Res.
neticum AMB-1 show that MamK distributes magnetosome organelles Biogeosci. 119: 1475–1486.
equally to daughter cells. MBio 8: e00679–e00617.
Schauer, R., Risgaard-Petersen, N., Kjeldsen, K.U. et al. (2014) Succession
Frischkorn, K.R., Stojanovski, A., and Paranjpye, R. (2013) Vibrio para­ of cable bacteria and electric currents in marine sediment. ISME J. 8:
haemolyticus type IV pili mediate interactions with diatom-derived chi­ 1314–1322.
tin and point to an unexplored mechanism of environmental persistence.
Environ. Microbiol. 15: 1416–1427. Seitaj, D., Schauer, R., Sulu-Gambari, F. et al. (2015) Cable bacteria gen­
erate a firewall against euxinia in seasonally hypoxic basins. Proc. Natl.
Jørgensen, B.B., and Gallardo, V.A. (1999) Thioploca spp.: filamentous Acad. Sci. 112: 13278–13283.
sulfur bacteria with nitrate vacuoles. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 28: 301–313.
Trojan, D., Schreiber, L., Bjerg, J.T. et al. (2016) A taxonomic framework
Lin, H., Yu, M., Wang, X. et al. (2018) Comparative genomic analysis for cable bacteria and proposal of the candidate genera Electrothrix and
reveals the evolution and environmental adaptation strategies of vibrios. Electronema. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 39: 297–306.
BMC Genomics 19: 135.
Vetriani, C., Voordeckers, J.W., Crespo-Medina, M. et al. (2014) Deep-
Miller, S.D., Haddock, S.H.D., Elvidge, C.D. and Lee, T.F. (2005). sea hydrothermal vent Epsilonproteobacteria encode a conserved and
Detection of a bioluminescent milky sea from space. Proc. Nat. Acad.Sci widespread nitrate reduction pathway (Nap). ISME J. 8: 1510–1521.
USA 102: 14181–14184.
Zhang, Y.-Q., Li, Y.-Z., Wang, B. et al. (2005) Characteristics and living
Thompson, C.C., Vicente, A., Souza, R.C. et al. (2009) Genomic taxon­ patterns of marine myxobacterial isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:
omy of vibrios. BMC Evol. Biol. 9: 258. 3331–3336.
Thompson, F.L., Gevers, D., Thompson, C.C. et al. (2005) Phylogeny and Mosca, A., Leclerc, M., and Hugot, J.P. (2016) Gut microbiota diversity
molecular identification of vibrios on the basis of multilocus sequence and human diseases: Should we reintroduce key predators in our ecosys­
analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 5107–5115. tem? Front. Microbiol. 7: 455.
Bjerg, J.T., Boschker, H.T.S., Larsen, S. et al. (2018) Long-distance elec­ Raghunathan, D., Radford, P.M., Gell, C. et al. (2019) Engulfment, per­
tron transport in individual, living cable bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. sistence and fate of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus predators inside human
U. S. A. 115: 5786–5791. phagocytic cells informs their future therapeutic potential. Sci. Rep. 9:
Bjerg, J.T., Damgaard, L.R., Holm, S.A. et al. (2016) Motility of electric 4293.
cable bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82: 3816–3821. Rotem, O., Pasternak, Z., and Jurkevitch, E. (2014) Bdellovibrio
Burdorf, L.D.W., Tramper, A., Seitaj, D. et al. (2017) Long-distance and like organisms. In: The Prokaryotes. Deltaproteobacteria and
electron transport occurs globally in marine sediments. Biogeosci. 14: Epsilonproteobacteria. Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E.F., Lory, S. et al. (eds.)
683–701. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 3–17.
Cornelissen, R., and Bøggild, A., Thiruvallur Eachambadi, R. et al. (2018) Laufer, K., Nordhoff, M., Halama, M. et al. (2017) Microaerophilic
The cell envelope structure of cable bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 9: 3044. Fe(II)-oxidizing zetaproteobacteria isolated from low-Fe marine coastal
sediments: physiology and composition of their twisted stalks. Appl.
Kessler, A.J., Wawryk, M., Marzocchi, U. et al. (2018) Cable bacteria
Environ. Microbiol. 83: e03118–e03116.
promote DNRA through iron sulfide dissolution. Limnol. Oceanogr. 64:
1228–1238. Moreira, A.P.B., Meirelles, P.M., and Thompson, F. (2014) The fam­
ily Mariprofundaceae. In: The Prokaryotes. Deltaproteobacteria and
Kuever, J. (2014a) The family Desulfobulbaceae. In: The Prokaryotes.
Epsilonproteobacteria. Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E.F., Lory, S. et al. (eds.)
Deltaproteobacteria and Epsilonproteobacteria. Rosenberg, E., DeLong,
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 403–413.
E.F., Lory, S. et al. (eds.) Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 75–86.
McAllister, S.M., Davis, R.E., McBeth, J.M. et al. (2011) Biodiversity
Kuever, J. (2014b) The family Desulfovibrionaceae. In: The Prokaryotes.
and emerging biogeography of the neutrophilic iron-oxidizing
Deltaproteobacteria and Epsilonproteobacteria. Rosenberg, E., DeLong,
Zetaproteobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77: 5445–5457.
E.F., Lory, S. et al. (eds.) Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 107–133.
Becker, J.W., Hogle, S.L., Rosendo, K. et al. (2019) Co-culture and bioge­
Malkin, S.Y., Seitaj, D., Burdorf, L.D.W. et al. (2017) Electrogenic sulfur
ography of Prochlorococcus and SAR11. ISME J. 13: 1506–1519.
oxidation by cable bacteria in bivalve reef sediments. Front. Mar. Sci. 4:
28.
References 37

Bergman, B., Sandh, G., Lin, S. et al. (2013a) Trichodesmium – a wide­ Zehr, J.P. (2015) How single cells work together. Science 349: 1163–1164.
spread marine cyanobacterium with unusual nitrogen fixation properties. Zehr, J.P., Shilova, I.N., Farnelid, H.M. et al. (2016) Unusual marine uni­
FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37: 286–302. cellular symbiosis with the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium UCYN-A.
Biller, S.J., Berube, P.M., Lindell, D. et al. (2015) Prochlorococcus: the Nat. Microbiol. 2: 16214.
structure and function of collective diversity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13: Boedeker, C., Schüler, M., Reintjes, G. et al. (2017) Determining the bac­
13–27. terial cell biology of Planctomycetes. Nat. Commun. 8: 14853.
Biller, S.J., Schubotz, F., Roggensack, S.E. et al. (2014) Bacterial vesicles Fernández-Gomez, B., Richter, M., Schüler, M. et al. (2013). Ecology
in marine ecosystems. Science 343: 183–186. of marine Bacteroidetes: a comparative genomics approach. ISME J. 7:
Cohen, S.E., and Golden, S.S. (2015) Circadian rhythms in Cyanobacteria. 1026.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79: 373–385. Hehemann, J.H., Correc, G., Barbeyron, T. et al. (2010). Transfer of car­
Coutinho, F., Tschoeke, D.A., Thompson, F. et al. (2016) Comparative bohydrate-active enzymes from marine bacteria to Japanese gut micro-
genomics of Synechococcus and proposal of the new genus biota. Nature 464: 908.
Parasynechococcus. PeerJ 4: e1522. Jeske, O., Schüler, M., Schumann, P. et al. (2015) Planctomycetes do pos­
Dubinsky, Z., and Berman-Frank, I. (2001) Uncoupling primary produc­ sess a peptidoglycan cell wall. Nat. Commun. 6: 7116.
tion from population growth in photosynthesizing organisms in aquatic Kartal, B., de Almeida, N.M., Maalcke, W.J. et al. (2013) How to make a
ecosystems. Aquat. Sci. 63: 4–17. living from anaerobic ammonium oxidation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37:
Ehlers, K., and Oster, G. (2012) On the mysterious propulsion of 428–461.
Synechococcus. PLoS One 7: e36081. Reintjes, G., Arnosti, C., Fuchs, B.M. et al. (2017). An alternative poly­
Farnelid, H., Turk-Kubo, K., Ploug, H. et al. (2019) Diverse diazotrophs saccharide uptake mechanism of marine bacteria. ISME J. 11:1640.
are present on sinking particles in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Wagner, M., and Horn, M. (2006) The Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia,
ISME J. 13: 170–182. Chlamydiae and sister phyla comprise a superphylum with biotechnologi­
Farnelid, H.M., Turk-Kubo, K.A., and Zehr, J.P. (2016) Identification of cal and medical relevance. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17: 241–249.
associations between bacterioplankton and photosynthetic picoeukary­ Wiegand, S., Jogler, M., and Jogler, C. (2018) On the maverick
otes in coastal waters. Front. Microbiol. 7: 339. Planctomycetes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 42: 739–760.
Flombaum, P., Gallegos, J.L., Gordillo, R.A. et al. (2013) Present and Žure, M., Fernandez-Guerra, A., Munn, C.B. et al. (2017). Geographic
future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus distribution at subspecies resolution level: closely related Rhodopirellula
and Synechococcus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110: 9824–9829. species in European coastal sediments. ISME J. 11: 478.
Foster, R.A., Kuypers, M.M.M., Vagner, T. et al. (2011) Nitrogen fixation Žure, M., Munn, C.B., and Harder, J. (2015) Diversity of Rhodopirellula
and transfer in open ocean diatom-cyanobacterial symbioses. ISME J. 5: and related planctomycetes in a North Sea coastal sediment employing
1484–1493. carB as molecular marker. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 362: fnv127.
Hagino, K., Onuma, R., Kawachi, M. et al. (2013) Discovery of an endo­ Bengtsson, M.M., and Øvreås, L. (2010). Planctomycetes dominate bio­
symbiotic nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium UCYN-A in Braarudosphaera films on surfaces of the kelp Laminaria hyperborea. BMC Microbiol.10:
bigelowii (Prymnesiophyceae). PLoS One 8: e81749. 261.
Johnson, Z.I., Zinser, E.R., Coe, A. et al. (2006) Niche partitioning among Angert, E. R., and Clements, K. D. (2004) Initiation of intracellular off­
Prochlorococcus ecotypes along ocean-scale environmental gradients. spring in Epulopiscium. Molec. Microbiol. 51: 827–835.
Science (80-.). 311: 1737–1740.
Kamanda Ngugi, D., Miyake, S., Cahill, M. et al. (2017) Genomic diver­
Kashtan, N., Roggensack, S.E., Rodrigue, S. et al. (2014) Single- sification of giant enteric symbionts reflects host dietary lifestyles. Proc.
cell genomics reveals hundreds of coexisting subpopulations in wild Natl. Acad. USA 1114: E7592.
Prochlorococcus. Science 344: 416–420.
Hanada, S. (2014) The phylum Chloroflexi, the family Chloroflexaceae,
Kent, A.G., Dupont, C.L., Yooseph, S. et al. (2016) Global biogeography and the related phototrophic families Oscillochloridaceae and
of Prochlorococcus genome diversity in the surface ocean. ISME J. 10: Roseiflexaceae. In: The Prokaryotes. Other Major Lineages of Bacteria
1856–1865. and the Archaea. Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E.F., Lory, S. et al. (eds.)
Mishra, A.K., Tiwari, D.N., and Rai, A.N. (2019) Cyanobacteria: From Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 515–532.
Basic Science to Applications. Academic Press. Landry, Z., Swan, B.K., Herndl, G.J. et al. (2017) SAR202 Genomes from
Moore, L.R. (2013). More mixotrophy in the marine microbial mix. Proc. the dark ocean predict pathways for the oxidation of recalcitrant dissolved
Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 110: 8323–8324. organic matter. MBio 8: e00413–e00417.
Muñoz-Marín, M.D.C., Shilova, I.N., Shi, T. et al. (2019) The transcrip­ Mehrshad, M., Rodriguez-Valera, F., Amoozegar, M.A. et al. (2018) The
tional cycle is suited to daytime N2 fixation in the unicellular cyanobacte­ enigmatic SAR202 cluster up close: shedding light on a globally distrib­
rium “Candidatus Atelocyanobacterium thalassa” (UCYN-A). MBio 10: uted dark ocean lineage involved in sulfur cycling. ISME J. 12: 655–668.
e02495–e02418. Barka, E.A., Vatsa, P., Sanchez, L. et al. (2016) Taxonomy, physiology,
Paerl, H. (2017) The cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation paradox in natural and natural products of Actinobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80:
waters. F1000Research 6: 244. 1–43.
Rocap, G., Larimer, F.W., Lamerdin, J. et al. (2003) Genome divergence Garcia, R., and Müller, R. (2014) The family Myxococcaceae. In:
in two Prochlorococcus ecotypes reflects oceanic niche differentiation. The Prokaryotes. Deltaproteobacteria and Epsilonproteobacteria.
Nature 424: 1042–1047. Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E.F., Lory, S. et al. (eds.) Springer Berlin,
Heidelberg, pp. 191–212.
Walter, J.M., Coutinho, F.H., Dutilh, B.E. et al. (2017) Ecogenomics and
taxonomy of Cyanobacteria phylum. Front. Microbiol. 8: 2132. McBride, M.J., Liu, W., Lu, X. et al. (2014) The family Cytophagaceae.
In: The Prokaryotes. Other Major Lineages of Bacteria and the Archaea.
Zehr, J.P. (2011) Nitrogen fixation by marine cyanobacteria. Trends
Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E.F., Lory, S. et al. (eds.) Springer Berlin
Microbiol. 19: 162–173.
Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 577–593.
38 References

Gupta, R.S. (2014) The phylum Aquificae. In: The Prokaryotes. Other Orsi, W.D., Smith, J.M., Wilcox, H.M. et al. (2015) Ecophysiology of
Major Lineages of Bacteria and the Archaea. Rosenberg, E., DeLong, uncultivated marine euryarchaea is linked to particulate organic matter.
E.F., Lory, S. et al. (eds.) Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 417–445. ISME J. 9: 1747–1763.
Adam, P.S., Borrel, G., Brochier-Armanet, C., and Gribaldo, S. (2017) Ruppel, C.D. and Kessler, J.D. (2017) The interaction of climate change
The growing tree of Archaea: New perspectives on their diversity, evolu­ and methane hydrates. Rev. Geophys. 55: 126–168.
tion and ecology. ISME J. 11: 2407–2425. Skennerton, C.T., Chourey, K., Iyer, R. et al. (2017) Methane-fueled syn­
Da Cunha, V., Gaia, M., Gadelle, D. et al. (2017) Lokiarchaea are close trophy through extracellular electron transfer: Uncovering the genomic
relatives of Euryarchaeota, not bridging the gap between prokaryotes and traits conserved within diverse bacterial partners of anaerobic methano­
eukaryotes. PLoS Genet. 13: e1006810. trophic archaea. MBio 8: e00530-17.
Eme, L., Spang, A., Lombard, J. et al. (2017) Archaea and the origin of Sparrow, K.J., Kessler, J.D., Southon, J.R. et al. (2018) Limited contribu­
eukaryotes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15: 711–723. tion of ancient methane to surface waters of the U.S. Beaufort Sea shelf.
Sci. Adv. 4: eaao4842.
Guy, L. and Ettema, T.J.G. (2011) The archaeal ‘TACK’ superphylum and
the origin of eukaryotes. Trends Microbiol. 19: 580–587. Wegener, G., Krukenberg, V., Riedel, D. et al. (2015) Intercellular wiring
enables electron transfer between methanotrophic archaea and bacteria.
Imachi, H., Nobu, M.K., Nakahara, N., et al. (2019) Isolation of an
Nature 526: 587–590.
archaeon at the prokaryote-eukaryote interface. bioRxiv, 726976.
Cerdeño-Tárraga AM. (2009) Genome watch: What a scorcher! Nat. Rev.
Kuypers, M.M.M., Blokker, P., Erbacher, J. et al. (2001) Massive expan­
Microbiol. 7: 408–409.
sion of marine Archaea during a Mid-Cretaceous oceanic anoxic event.
Science 293: 92–95. Heimerl, T., Flechsler, J., Pickl, C. et al. (2017) A complex endomembrane
system in the archaeon Ignicoccus hospitalis tapped by Nanoarchaeum
Lake, J.A., Henderson, E., Oakes, M., and Clark, M.W. (1984) Eocytes: A
equitans. Front. Microbiol. 8: 1072.
new ribosome structure indicates a kingdom with a close relationship to
eukaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 3786–3790. Nicks, T. and Rahn-Lee, L. (2017) Inside out: Archaeal ectosymbionts
suggest a second model of reduced-genome evolution. Front. Microbiol.
Nasir, A., Kim, K.M., Da Cunha, V., and Caetano-Anollés, G. (2016)
8: 384.
Arguments reinforcing the three-domain view of diversified cellular life.
Archaea 2016: 1851865. Waters, E., Hohn, M.J., Ahel, I. et al. (2003) The genome of Nanoarchaeum
equitans: Insights into early archaeal evolution and derived parasitism.
Ren, M., Feng, X., Huang, Y. et al. (2019) Phylogenomics suggests oxygen
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 12984–12988.
availability as a driving force in Thaumarchaeota evolution. ISME J. 13:
2150–2161. Bayer, B., Vojvoda, J., Reinthaler, T. et al. (2019) Nitrosopumilus adri­
aticus sp. nov. and Nitrosopumilus piranensis sp. nov., two ammonia-
Rivera, M.C. and Lake, J.A. (1992) Evidence that eukaryotes and eocyte
oxidizing archaea from the Adriatic Sea and members of the class
prokaryotes are immediate relatives. Science 257: 74–76.
Nitrososphaeria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 69: 1892–1902.
Schloss, P.D., Girard, R.A., Martin,T. et al. (2016) Status of the archaeal
Brochier-Armanet, C., Boussau, B., Gribaldo, S., and Forterre, P. (2008)
and bacterial census: An update. MBio 7: e00201-16.
Mesophilic crenarchaeota: Proposal for a third archaeal phylum, the
Spang, A., Saw, J.H., Jørgensen, S.L. et al. (2015) Complex archaea that Thaumarchaeota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6: 245–252.
bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nature 521: 173–179.
Brochier-Armanet, C., Gribaldo, S., and Forterre, P. (2011) Spotlight on
Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E. (1977) Phylogenetic structure of the pro­ the Thaumarchaeota. ISME J. 6: 227–230.
karyotic domain: The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 74:
Daebeler, A., Herbold, C.W., Vierheilig, J. et al. (2018) Cultivation and
5088–5090.
genomic analysis of “Candidatus Nitrosocaldus islandicus,” an obligately
Woese, C.R., Kandler, O., and Wheelis, M.L. (1990) Towards a natural thermophilic, ammonia-oxidizing thaumarchaeon from a hot spring bio­
system of organisms: Proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and film in Graendalur Valley, Iceland. Front. Microbiol. 9: 193.
Eucarya. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87: 4576–4579.
Herndl, G.J., Reinthaler, T., Teira, E. et al. (2005) Contribution of
Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, K., Caceres, E.F., Saw, J.H. et al. (2017) Asgard Archaea to total prokaryotic production in the deep Atlantic Ocean. Appl.
archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity. Nature Environ. Microbiol. 71: 2303–2309.
541: 353–358.
Karner, M.B., DeLong, E.F., and Karl, D.M. (2001) Archaeal dominance
Cui, M., Ma, A., Qi, H. et al. (2015) Anaerobic oxidation of methane: An in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific Ocean. Nature 409: 507–510.
‘active’ microbial process. Microbiol. Open 4: 1–11.
Könneke, M., Bernhard, A.E., de la Torre, J.R. et al. (2005) Isolation of an
Evans, P.N., Boyd, J.A., Leu, A.O. et al. (2019) An evolving view of meth­ autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon. Nature 437: 543–546.
ane metabolism in the Archaea. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17: 219–232.
Könneke, M., Schubert, D.M., Brown, P.C. et al. (2014) Ammonia-
Haro-Moreno, J.M., Rodriguez-Valera, F., López-García, P. et al (2017) oxidizing archaea use the most energy-efficient aerobic pathway for CO2
New insights into marine group III Euryarchaeota, from dark to light. fixation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 8239–8244.
ISME J. 11: 1102–1117.
Martens-Habbena, W., Berube, P.M., Urakawa, H. et al. (2009) Ammonia
Knittel, K., Losekann, T., Boetius, A. et al. Diversity and distribution oxidation kinetics determine niche separation of nitrifying Archaea and
of methanotrophic Archaea at cold seeps. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: Bacteria. Nature 461: 976–979.
467–479.
Mosier, A.C., Allen, E.E., Kim, M. et al. (2012) Genome sequence of
Martin-Cuadrado, A.-B., Garcia-Heredia, I., Moltó, A.G. et al. (2015) A “Candidatus Nitrosopumilus salaria” BD31, an ammonia-oxidizing
new class of marine Euryarchaeota group II from the mediterranean deep Archaeon from the San Francisco Bay estuary. J. Bacteriol. 194:
chlorophyll maximum. ISME J. 9: 1619–1634. 2121–2122.
McGlynn, S.E., Chadwick, G.L., Kempes, C.P., and Orphan, V.J. (2015) Park, S.-J., Kim, J.-G., Jung, M.-Y. et al. (2012a) Draft genome sequence
Single cell activity reveals direct electron transfer in methanotrophic con­ of an ammonia-oxidizing archaeon, “Candidatus Nitrosopumilus sedi­
sortia. Nature 526: 531–535. minis” AR2, from Svalbard in the Arctic Circle. J. Bacteriol. 194:
6948–6949.
References 39

Park, S.-J., Kim, J.-G., Jung, M.-Y. et al. (2012b) Draft genome sequence Millette, N.C., Grosse, J., Johnson, W.M. et al. (2018) Hidden in plain
of an ammonia-oxidizing archaeon, “Candidatus Nitrosopumilus kore­ sight: The importance of cryptic interactions in marine plankton. Limnol.
ensis” AR1, from marine sediment. J. Bacteriol. 194: 6940–6941. Oceanogr. Lett. 3: 341–356.
Peng, X., Fuchsman, C.A., Jayakumar, A. et al. (2016) Revisiting nitri­ Moreira, D. & López-García, P. (2002) The molecular ecology of micro­
fication in the Eastern Tropical South Pacific: A focus on controls. J. bial eukaryotes unveils a hidden world. Trends Microbiol. 10: 31–38.
Geophys. Res. Ocean. 121: 1667–1684. Moreira, D. & López-García, P. (2003) Are hydrothermal vents oases for
Qin, W., Amin, S.A., Martens-Habbena, W. et al. (2014) Marine ammo­ parasitic protists? Trends Parasitol. 19: 556–558.
nia-oxidizing archaeal isolates display obligate mixotrophy and wide Nissimov, J.I. & Bidle, K.D. (2017) Stress, death, and the biological glue
ecotypic variation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 12504–12509. of sinking matter. J. Phycol. 53: 241–244.
Qin, W., Heal, K.R., Ramdasi, R. et al. (2017) Nitrosopumilus mari­ Rocke, E., Pachiadaki, M.G., Cobban, A. et al. (2015) Protist community
timus gen. nov., sp. nov., Nitrosopumilus cobalaminigenes sp. nov., grazing on prokaryotic prey in deep ocean water masses. PLoS One 10:
Nitrosopumilus oxyclinae sp. nov., and Nitrosopumilus ureiphilus sp. nov., e0124505.
four marine ammonia-oxidizing archaea of the phylum Thaumarchaeota.
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 67: 5067–5079. Sherr, B.F., Sherr, E.B., Caron, D.A. et al. (2007) Oceanic protists.
Oceanography 20: 130–134.
Santoro, A.E. and Casciotti, K.L. (2011) Enrichment and characterization
of ammonia-oxidizing archaea from the open ocean: Phylogeny, physiol­ Stoecker, D.K., Johnson, M.D., de Vargas, C., & Not, F. (2009) Acquired
ogy and stable isotope fractionation. ISME J. 5: 1796–1808. phototrophy in aquatic protists. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 57: 279–310.
Santoro, A.E., Dupont, C.L., Richter, R.A. et al. (2015) Genomic and Strassert, J.F., Karnkowska, A., Hehenberger, E. et al. (2018) Single cell
proteomic characterization of “Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus brevis”: An genomics of uncultured marine alveolates shows paraphyly of basal dino­
ammonia-oxidizing archaeon from the open ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. flagellates. ISME J. 12: 304.
USA 112: 1173–1178. Worden, A.Z. & Not, F. (2008) Ecology and diversity of picoeukaryotes.
Teira, E., Reinthaler, T., Pernthaler, A. et al. (2004) Combining catalyzed In: Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, D.L. Kirchman (ed.). Wiley-Liss
reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization and microautora­ Inc., New York, pp. 159–205.
diography to detect substrate utilization by bacteria and archaea in the Boenigk, J. & Arndt, H. (2002) Bacterivory by heterotrophic flagellates:
deep ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 4411–4414. Community structure and feeding strategies. Ant. van Leuevenhoek 81:
Venter, J.C., Remington, K., Hoffman, J. et al. (2004) Environmental 465–480.
genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304: 66–74. De Corte, D., Paredes, G., Yokokawa, T. et al. (2018) Differential response
Wuchter, C., Abbas, B., Coolen, M.J.L. et al. (2006) Archaeal nitrification of Cafeteria roenbergensis to different bacterial and archaeal prey char­
in the ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103: 12317–12322. acteristics. Microb. Ecol. 78: 1–5.
Wuchter, C., Schouten, S., Boschker, H.T.S., and Sinninghe Damste, J.S. del Campo, J., Not, F., Forn, I. et al. (2013) Taming the smallest predators
(2003) Bicarbonate uptake by marine Crenarchaeota. FEMS Microbiol. of the oceans. ISME J. 7: 351–358.
Lett. 219: 203–207. Fenchel, T. & Patterson, D.J. (1988) Cafeteria roenbergensis nov. gen.,
DeLong, E.F. (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc. Natl. nov. sp., a heterotrophic microflagellate from marine plankton. Mar.
Acad. Sci. USA 89: 5685–5689. Microb. Food Webs 3: 9–19.
Fuhrman, J.A., McCallum, K., and Davis, A.A. (1992) novel major Gawryluk, R.M., del Campo, J., Okamoto, N. et al. (2016) Morphological
archaebacterial group from marine plankton. Nature 356: 148–149. identification and single-cell genomics of marine diplonemids. Curr.
Biol. 26: 3053–3059.
Huber, H. and Stetter, K.O. (1998) Hyperthermophiles and their possible
potential in biotechnology. J. Biotechnol. 64: 39–52. Gimmler, A., Korn, R., de Vargas, C. et al. (2016) The Tara Oceans voy­
age reveals global diversity and distribution patterns of marine planktonic
Kashefi, K. and Lovley, D.R. (2003) Extending the upper temperature ciliates. Sci. Rep. 6: 33555.
limit for life. Science 301: 934.
González, J.M. & Suttle, C.A. (1993) Grazing by marine nanoflagellates
Santoro, A.E., Richter, R.A., and Dupont, C.L. (2019) Planktonic Marine on viruses and virus-sized particles: Ingestion and digestion. Mar. Ecol.
Archaea. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 11: 131–158. Prog. Ser. 94: 1–10.
Adl, S.M., Bass, D., Lane, C.E. et al. (2019) Revisions to the classifica­ Jezbera, J., Hornak, K., & Simek, K. (2005) Food selection by bacterivo­
tion, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. rous protists: Insight from the analysis of the food vacuole content by
66: 4–119. means of fluorescence in situ hybridization. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 52:
Ainsworth, T.D., Fordyce, A.J., & Camp, E.F. (2017) The other microeu­ 351–363.
karyotes of the coral reef microbiome. Trends Microbiol. 25: 980–991. Johnson, M.D., Lasek-Nesselquist, E., Moeller, H.V. et al. (2017)
Caron, D.A., Countway, P.D., Jones, A.C. et al. (2012) Marine protistan Mesodinium rubrum: The symbiosis that wasn’t. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
diversity. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4: 467–493. USA 114: E1040–E1042.
de Vargas, C., Audic, S., Henry, N. et al. (2015) Ocean plankton. Laundon, D., Larson, B.T., McDonald, K. et al. (2019) The architecture of
Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean. Science 348: 1261605. cell differentiation in choanoflagellates and sponge choanocytes. PLOS
Biol. 17: e3000226.
Gast, R.J., Sanders, R.W. & Caron, D.A. (2009) Ecological strategies
of protists and their symbiotic relationships with prokaryotic microbes. Medina, L.E., Taylor, C.D., Pachiadaki, M.G. et al. (2017) A review of
Trends Microbiol. 17: 563–569. protist grazing below the photic zone emphasizing studies of oxygen-
depleted water columns and recent applications of in situ approaches.
Keeling, P.J. & Campo, J. Del (2017) Marine protists are not just big bac­
Front. Mar. Sci. 4: 105.
teria. Curr. Biol. 27: R541–R549.
Pernice, M.C., Forn, I., Gomes, A. et al. (2015) Global abundance of
Lima-Mendez, G., Faust, K., Henry, N. et al. (2015) Determinants of
planktonic heterotrophic protists in the deep ocean. ISME J. 9: 782–792.
community structure in the global plankton interactome. Science 348:
1262073.
40 References

Seeleuthner, Y., Mondy, S., Lombard, V. et al. (2018) Single-cell genom­ Hastings, J.W. (2007) The Gonyaulax clock at 50: Translational control of
ics of multiple uncultured stramenopiles reveals underestimated func­ circadian expression. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 72: 141–144.
tional diversity across oceans. Nat. Commun. 9: 310. Liu, H., Stephens, T.G., González-Pech, R.A. et al. (2018) Symbiodinium
Sengupta, A., Carrara, F. & Stocker, R. (2017) Phytoplankton can actively genomes reveal adaptive evolution of functions related to coral-dinofla­
diversify their migration strategy in response to turbulent cues. Nature gellate symbiosis. Commun. Biol. 1: 95.
543: 555–558. Valiadi, M. & Iglesias-Rodriguez, D. (2013) Understanding biolumi­
Sieracki, M.E., Poulton, N.J., Jaillon, O. et al. (2019) Single cell genomics nescence in dinoflagellates—How far have we come? Microorganism 1:
yields a wide diversity of small planktonic protists across major ocean 3–25.
ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 9: 6025. Wisecaver, J.H. & Hackett, J.D. (2011) Dinoflagellate genome evolution.
Mcmanus, G.B., Schoener, D., & Haberlandt, K. (2012) Chloroplast sym­ Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 65: 369–387.
biosis in a marine ciliate: Ecophysiology and the risks and rewards of Anderson, O.R. (2001) Protozoa, radiolarians. In: Encyclopedia of Ocean
hosting foreign organelles. Front Microbiol 3: 321. Sciences, J. Steele, S. Thorpe & K. Turekian (eds.). Academic Press, pp.
Qiu, D., Huang, L., & Lin, S. (2016) Cryptophyte farming by symbiotic 2315–2319.
ciliate host detected in situ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113: 12208–12213. Gooday, A.J., Sykes, D., Góral, T. et al. (2018) Micro-CT 3D imaging
Stoecker, D.K., Hansen, P.J., Caron, D.A., & Mitra, A. (2017) Mixotrophy reveals the internal structure of three abyssal xenophyophore species
in the Marine Plankton. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 9: 311–335. (Protista, Foraminifera) from the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean. Sci.
Rep. 8: 12103.
Stoecker, D.K., Johnson, M.D., de Vargas, C., & Not, F. (2009) Acquired
phototrophy in aquatic protists. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 57: 279–310. Lampitt, R.S., Salter, I. & Johns, D. (2009) Radiolaria: Major exporters of
organic carbon to the deep ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23: GB1010.
Ward, B.A. (2019) Mixotroph ecology: More than the sum of its parts.
doi: 10.1029/2008GB003221
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116: 5846–5848.
Murray, J. (2008) Ecology and Applications of Benthic Foraminifera.
Balch, W.M. (2018) The ecology, biogeochemistry, and optical properties
Cambridge University Press.
of coccolithophores. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 10: 71–98.
Agha, R., Saebelfeld, M., Manthey, C. et al. (2016) Chytrid parasitism
Monteiro, F.M., Bach, L.T., Brownlee, C. et al. (2016) Why marine phyto­
facilitates trophic transfer between bloom-forming cyanobacteria and
plankton calcify. Sci. Adv. 2: e1501822.
zooplankton (Daphnia). Sci. Rep. 6: 35039.
Taylor, A.R., Brownlee, C., & Wheeler, G. (2017) Coccolithophore cell
Amend, A. (2014) From dandruff to deep-sea vents: Malassezia-like
biology: Chalking up progress. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 9: 283–310.
Fungi are ecologically hyper-diverse. PLoS Pathog. 10: e1004277.
Xu, K., Hutchins, D., & Gao, K. (2018) Coccolith arrangement follows
Amend, A., Burgaud, G., Cunliffe, M. et al. (2019) Fungi in the marine
Eulerian mathematics in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi. Peer J.
environment: Open questions and unsolved problems. MBio 10:
6: e4608.
e101189-18.
Bidle, K.D. (2002) Regulation of oceanic silicon and carbon preservation
Bochdansky, A.B., Clouse, M.A. & Herndl, G.J. (2017) Eukaryotic
by temperature control on bacteria. Science 298: 1980–1984.
microbes, principally fungi and labyrinthulomycetes, dominate biomass
Bidle, K.D. & Azam, F. (1999) Accelerated dissolution of diatom silica by on bathypelagic marine snow. ISME J. 11: 362–373.
marine bacterial assemblages. Nature 397: 508–512.
Cunliffe, M., Hollingsworth, A., Bain, C. et al. (2017) Algal polysaccha­
Bidle, K.D. & Azam, F. (2001) Bacterial control of silicon regeneration ride utilisation by saprotrophic planktonic marine fungi. Fungal Ecol.
from diatom detritus: Significance of bacterial ectohydrolases and species 30: 135–138.
identity. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46: 1606–1623.
Frenken, T., Alacid, E., Berger, S.A. et al. (2017) Integrating chytrid fun­
Gradinger, R., Bluhm, B.A., Hopcroft, R.R. et al. (2010) Marine life in gal parasites into plankton ecology: Research gaps and needs. Environ.
the arctic. In: Life in the World’s Oceans. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, Microbiol. 19: 3802–3822.
pp. 183–202.
Frenken, T., Wierenga, J., van Donk, E. et al. (2018) Fungal parasites of
Kröger, N. & Poulsen, N. (2008) Diatoms—From cell wall biogenesis to a toxic inedible cyanobacterium provide food to zooplankton. Limnol.
nanotechnology. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42: 83–107. Oceanogr, 63: 2384–2393.
Leblanc, K., Queguiner, B., Diaz, F. et al. (2018) Nanoplanktonic dia­ Golubic, S., Radtke, G. & Campion-Alsumard, T.L. (2005) Endolithic
toms are globally overlooked but play a role in spring blooms and carbon fungi in marine ecosystems. Trends Microbiol. 13: 229–235.
export. Nat. Commun. 9: 953.
Grossart, H.-P., Van den Wyngaert, S., Kagami, M. et al. (2019) Fungi in
Akbar, M., Ahmad, A., Usup, G., & Bunawan, H. (2018) Current knowl­ aquatic ecosystems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17: 339–354.
edge and recent advances in marine dinoflagellate transcriptomic
Gutiérrez, M.H., Jara, A.M. & Pantoja, S. (2016) Fungal parasites infect
research. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 6: 13.
marine diatoms in the upwelling ecosystem of the Humboldt current sys­
Figueroa, R.I., Estrada, M., & Garcés, E. (2018) Life histories of microal­ tem off central Chile. Environ. Microbiol. 18: 1646–1653.
gal species causing harmful blooms: Haploids, diploids and the relevance
Gutiérrez, M.H., Pantoja, S., Quiñones, R.A. & González, R.R. (2010)
of benthic stages. Harmful Algae 73: 44–57.
First record of filamentous fungi in the coastal upwelling ecosystem off
Gómez, F. (2012) A quantitative review of the lifestyle, habitat and tro­ central Chile. Gayana 74: 66–73.
phic diversity of dinoflagellates (Dinoflagellata, Alveolata). System.
Gutiérrez, M.H., Pantoja, S., Tejos, E. & Quiñones, R.A. (2011) The role
Biodiv. 10: 267–275.
of fungi in processing marine organic matter in the upwelling ecosystem
Grossart, H.P., Levold, F., Allgaier, M. et al. (2005) Marine diatom off Chile. Mar. Biol. 158: 205–219.
species harbour distinct bacterial communities. Environ. Microbiol. 7:
Hassett, B.T., Borrego, E.J., Vonnahme, T.R. et al. (2019) Arctic marine
860–873.
fungi: Biomass, functional genes, and putative ecological roles. ISME J.
Haddock, S.H.D., Moline, M.A. & Case, J.F. (2010) Bioluminescence in 13: 1484.
the sea. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2: 443–493.
References 41

Hassett, B.T., Ducluzeau, A.-L.L., Collins, R.E. & Gradinger, R. (2017) Derelle, E., Ferraz, C., Escande, M.L., et al. (2008) Life-cycle and genome
Spatial distribution of aquatic marine fungi across the western Arctic and of OtV5, a large DNA virus of the pelagic marine unicellular green alga
sub-arctic. Environ. Microbiol. 19: 475–484. Ostreococcus tauri. PLoS One 3: e2250.
Hassett, B.T. & Gradinger, R. (2016) Chytrids dominate arctic marine Feiner, R., Argov, T., Rabinovich, L., et al. (2015) A new perspective on
fungal communities. Environ. Microbiol. 18: 2001–2009. lysogeny: Prophages as active regulatory switches of bacteria. Nat. Rev.
Microbiol. 13: 641.
Hu, S., Guo, Z., Li, T. et al. (2015) Molecular analysis of in situ diets of
coral reef copepods: Evidence of terrestrial plant detritus as a food source Gregory, A.C., Zayed, A.A., Conceição-Neto, N. et al. (2019) Marine
in Sanya Bay, China. J. Plankton Res. 37: 363–371. DNA  viral macro- and microdiversity from pole to pole. Cell 177:
1109–1123.e14.
Kagami, M., Miki, T. & Takimoto, G. (2014) Mycoloop: Chytrids in
aquatic food webs. Front. Microbiol. 5: 166. Hewson, I. & Fuhrman, J.A. (2006) Viral impacts upon marine bacte­
rioplankton assemblage structure. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 86: 577–589.
Lafferty, K.D., Allesina, S., Arim, M. et al. (2008) Parasites in food webs:
The ultimate missing links. Ecol. Lett. 11: 533–46. Johns, C.T., Grubb, A.R., Nissimov, J.I., et al. (2019) The mutual interplay
between calcification and coccolithovirus infection. Environ. Microbiol.
Maloy, A.P., Culloty, S.C. & Slater, J.W. (2013) Dietary analysis of
21: 1896–1915.
small planktonic consumers: A case study with marine bivalve larvae. J.
Plankton Res. 35: 866–876. Knowles, B., Silveira, C.B., Bailey, B.A., et al. (2016) Lytic to temperate
switching of viral communities. Nature 531: 466.
Nilsson, R.H., Anslan, S., Bahram, M. et al. (2019) Mycobiome diver­
sity: High-throughput sequencing and identification of fungi. Nat. Rev. Martínez, J.M., Schroeder, D.C., & Wilson, W.H. (2012) Dynamics
Microbiol. 17: 95–109. and genotypic composition of Emiliania huxleyi and their co-occur­
ring viruses during a coccolithophore bloom in the North Sea. FEMS
Orsi, W., Biddle, J.F. & Edgcomb, V. (2013) Deep sequencing of sub-
Microbiol. Ecol. 81: 315–323.
seafloor eukaryotic rRNA reveals active fungi across marine subsurface
provinces. PLoS One 8: e56335. Maslov, S. & Sneppen, K. (2017) Population cycles and species diversity
in dynamic Kill-the-Winner model of microbial ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 7:
Paz, Z., Komon-Zelazowska, M., Druzhinina, I.S. et al. (2010)
39642.
Diversity and potential antifungal properties of fungi associated with a
Mediterranean sponge. Fungal Divers. 42: 17–26. Michaelson, L.V., Dunn, T.M., & Napier, J.A. (2010) Viral trans-domi­
nant manipulation of algal sphingolipids. Trends Plant Sci. 15: 651–655.
Taylor, J.D. & Cunliffe, M. (2016) Multi-year assessment of coastal
planktonic fungi reveals environmental drivers of diversity and abun­ Munn, C.B. (2006) Viruses as pathogens of marine organisms—From
dance. ISME J. 10: 2118. bacteria to whales. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 86: 1–15.
Sherwood, A.R., Smith, C.M. &Amend, A.S. (2017) Fungi associated Nissimov, J.I. & Bidle, K.D. (2017) Stress, death, and the biological glue
with mesophotic macroalgae from the ‘Au‘au Channel, west Maui are dif­ of sinking matter. J. Phycol. 53: 241–244.
ferentiated by host and overlap terrestrial communities. Peer J. 5: e3532. Reche, I., D’Orta, G., Mladenov, N. et al. (2018) Deposition rates of
Wainwright, B.J., Zahn, G.L., Spalding, H.L., et al. (2017) Fungi associ­ viruses and bacteria above the atmospheric boundary layer. ISME J. 12:
ated with mesophotic macroalgae from the ‘Au ‘au Channel, west Maui 1154.
are differentiated by host and overlap terrestrial communities. Peer J. 5: Rohwer, F. & Thurber, R. V (2009) Viruses manipulate the marine envi­
e3532. ronment. Nature 459: 207–212.
Xu, Z., Wang, M., Wu, W. et al. (2018) Vertical distribution of microbial Simmonds, P. (2015) Methods for virus classification and the challenge of
eukaryotes from surface to the hadal zone of the Mariana Trench. Front. incorporating metagenomic sequence data. J. Gen. Virol. 96: 1193–1206.
Microbiol. 9: 2023.
Soler, N., Krupovic, M., Marguet, E. & (2015) Membrane vesicles in
Yarden, O. (2014) Fungal association with sessile marine invertebrates. natural environments: A major challenge in viral ecology. ISME J. 9:
Front. Microbiol. 5: 228. 793–796.
Avrani, S., Schwartz, D.A., & Lindell, D. (2012) Virus-host swinging Suttle, C.A. (2005) Viruses in the sea. Nature 437: 359–361.
party in the oceans: Incorporating biological complexity into paradigms
of antagonistic coexistence. Mob. Genet. Elem. 2: 88–95. Suttle, C.A. (2007) Marine viruses—Major players in the global ecosys­
tem. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5: 801–812.
Baran, N., Goldin, S., Maidanik, I., & Lindell, D. (2018) Quantification
of diverse virus populations in the environment using the polony method. Thingstad, T.F. (2000) Elements of a theory for the mechanisms con­
Nat. Microbiol. 3: 62. trolling abundance, diversity, and biogeochemical role of lytic bacterial
viruses in aquatic systems. Limnol. Oceanog. 45: 1320–1328.
Brum, J.R., Schenck, R.O., & Sullivan, M.B. (2013) Global morpho­
logical analysis of marine viruses shows minimal regional variation and Winter, C., Bouvier, T., Weinbauer, M.G. & Thingstad, T.F. (2010) Trade­
dominance of non-tailed viruses. ISME J. 7: 1738–1751. offs between competition and defense specialists among unicellular
planktonic organisms: The “killing the winner” hypothesis revisited.
Cai, L., Jørgensen, B.B., Suttle, C.A. et al. (2019) Active and diverse Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 74: 42–57.
viruses persist in the deep sub-seafloor sediments over thousands of
years. ISME J. 13: 1857–1864. Biller, S.J., Schubotz, F., Roggensack, S.E. et al. (2014) Bacterial vesicles
in marine ecosystems. Science 343: 183–186.
Chaikeeratisak, V., Nguyen, K., Egan, M.E., et al. (2017) The phage
nucleus and tubulin spindle are conserved among large Pseudomonas Breitbart, M., Bonnain, C., Malki, K., & Sawaya, N.A. (2018) Phage pup­
phages. Cell Rep. 20: 1563–1571. pet masters of the marine microbial realm. Nat. Microbiol. 3: 754–766.
Culley, A. (2018) New insight into the RNA aquatic virosphere via Breitbart, M. & Rohwer, F. (2005) Here a virus, there a virus, everywhere
viromics. Virus Res. 244: 84–89. the same virus? Trends Microbiol. 13: 278–284.
Danovaro, R., Dell’Anno, A., Corinaldesi, C. et al. (2008) Major viral Krishnamurthy, S.R., Janowski, A.B., Zhao, G. et al. (2016)
impact on the functioning of benthic deep-sea ecosystems. Nature 454: Hyperexpansion of RNA bacteriophage diversity. PLoS Biol. 14:
1084–1087. e1002409.
42 References

Lindell, D., Jaffe, J.D., Johnson, Z.I. et al. (2005) Photosynthesis genes in Nissimov, J.I., Talmy, D., Haramaty, L. et al. (2019) Biochemical diversity
marine viruses yield proteins during host infection. Nature 438: 86–89. of glycosphingolipid biosynthesis as a driver of Coccolithovirus competi­
tive ecology. Environ. Microbiol. 21: 2182–2197.
Lindell, D., Sullivan, M.B., Johnson, Z.I. et al. (2004) Transfer of photo­
synthesis genes to and from Prochlorococcus viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Nissimov, J.I., Vandzura, R., Johns, C.T. et al. (2018) Dynamics of trans­
Sci. USA 101: 11013–11018. parent exopolymer particle production and aggregation during viral
infection of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi. Environ. Microbiol.
Mann, N.H., Cook, A., Millard, A. et al. (2003) Marine ecosystems:
20(8): 2880–2897.
Bacterial photosynthesis genes in a virus. Nature 424: 741.
Pagarete, A., Allen, M.J., Wilson, W.H. et al. (2009) Host-virus shift of
Ofir, G. &Sorek, R. (2018) Contemporary phage biology: From classic
the sphingolipid pathway along an Emiliania huxleyi bloom: Survival of
models to new insights. Cell 172: 1260–1270.
the fattest. Environ. Microbiol. 11: 2840–2848.
Paul, J.H. (2008) Prophages in marine bacteria: Dangerous molecular
Pagarete, A., Le Corguillé, G., Tiwari, B. et al. (2011) Unveiling the tran­
time bombs or the key to survival in the seas? ISME J. 2: 579–589.
scriptional features associated with coccolithovirus infection of natural
Sullivan, M.B., Lindell, D., Lee, J.A. et al. (2006) Prevalence and evolu­ Emiliania huxleyi blooms. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 78: 555–564.
tion of core photosystem II genes in marine cyanobacterial viruses and
Rose, S.L., Fulton, J.M., Brown, C.M. et al. (2014) Isolation and charac­
their hosts. PLOS Biol. 4: 1344–1357.
terization of lipid rafts in E miliania huxleyi : A role for membrane micro-
Allen, M.J., Forster, T., Schroeder, D.C. et al. (2006) Locus-specific gene domains in host-virus interactions. Environ. Microbiol. 16: 1150–1166.
expression pattern suggests a unique propagation strategy for a giant algal
Rosenwasser, S., Mausz, M.A., Schatz, D. et al. (2014) Rewiring host lipid
virus. J. Virol. 80: 7699–7705.
metabolism by large viruses determines the fate of Emiliania huxleyi, a
Bidle, K.D. (2016) Programmed cell death in unicellular phytoplankton. bloom-forming alga in the ocean. Plant Cell 26: 2689–2707.
Curr. Biol. 26: R594–R607.
Schatz, D., Shemi, A., Rosenwasser, S. et al. (2014) Hijacking of an
Bidle, K.D., Haramaty, L., Barcelos e Ramos, J. & Falkowski, P. (2007) autophagy-like process is critical for the life cycle of a DNA virus infect­
Viral activation and recruitment of metacaspases in the unicellular ing oceanic algal blooms. New Phytol. 204: 854–863.
coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:
Schroeder, D.C., Oke, J., Hall, M. et al. (2003) Virus succession observed
6049–6054.
during an Emiliania huxleyi bloom. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:
Frada, M., Probert, I., Allen, M.J. et al. (2008) The “Cheshire Cat” escape 2484–2490.
strategy of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi in response to viral
Schroeder, D.C., Oke, J., Malin, G. & Wilson, W.H. (2002) Coccolithovirus
infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 15944–15949.
(Phycodnaviridae): Characterisation of a new large dsDNA algal virus
Frada, M.J., Rosenwasser, S., Ben-Dor, S. et al. (2017) Morphological that infects Emiliania huxleyi. Arch. Virol. 147: 1685–1698.
switch to a resistant subpopulation in response to viral infection in the
Sorensen, G., Baker, A.C., Hall, M.J. et al. (2009) Novel virus dynamics
bloom-forming coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi. PLoS Pathogens 13:
in an Emiliania huxleyi bloom. J. Plankton Res. 31: 787–791.
e1006775.
Vardi, A., Van Mooy, B.A.S., Fredricks, H.F. et al. (2009) Viral glyco­
Fulton, J.M., Fredricks, H.F., Bidle, K.D. et al. (2014) Novel molecular
sphingolipids induce lytic infection and cell death in marine phytoplank­
determinants of viral susceptibility and resistance in the lipidome of
ton. Science 326: 861–865.
Emiliania huxleyi. Environ. Microbiol. 16: 1137–1149.
Wilson, W.H., Allen, M.J., Schroeder, D.C. et al. (2005) Complete genome
Jacquet, S., Heldal, M., Iglesias-Rodriguez, D. et al. (2002) Flow cytomet­
sequence and lytic phase transcription profile of a Coccolithovirus.
ric analysis of an Emiliania huxleyi bloom terminated by viral infection.
Science 309: 1090–1092.
Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 27: 111–124.
Wilson, W.H., Tarran, G.A., Schroeder, D. et al. (2002) Isolation of
Laber, C.P., Hunter, J.E., Carvalho, F. et al. (2018) Coccolithovirus facili­
viruses responsible for the demise of an Emiliania huxleyi bloom in the
tation of carbon export in the North Atlantic. Nat. Microbiol. 3: 537.
English Channel. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 82: 369–377.
Mackinder, L.C.M., Worthy, C.A., Biggi, G. et al. (2009) A unicellular
Yamada, Y., Tomaru, Y., Fukuda, H., & Nagata, T. (2018) Aggregate for­
algal virus, Emiliania huxleyi virus 86, exploits an animal-like infection
mation during the viral lysis of a marine diatom. Front. Mar. Sci. 5: 167.
strategy. J. Gen. Virol. 90: 2306–2316.
Ziv, C., Malitsky, S., Othman, A. et al. (2016) Viral serine palmitoyl­
Malitsky, S., Ziv, C., Rosenwasser, S. et al. (2016) Viral infection of the
transferase induces metabolic switch in sphingolipid biosynthesis and is
marine alga Emiliania huxleyi triggers lipidome remodeling and induces
required for infection of a marine alga. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113:
the production of highly saturated triacylglycerol. New Phytol. 210:
E1907–E1916.
88–96.
Abrahão, J., Silva, L., Silva, L.S. et al. (2018) Tailed giant Tupanvirus
Martinez, J.M., Schroeder, D.C., Larsen, A. et al. (2007) Molecular
possesses the most complete translational apparatus of the known viro­
dynamics of Emiliania huxleyi and cooccurring viruses during two sepa­
sphere. Nat. Commun. 9: 749.
rate mesocosm studies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 554–562.
Boyer, M., Azza, S., Barrassi, L. et al. (2011) Mimivirus shows dramatic
Monier, A., Pagarete, A., de Vargas, C. et al. (2009) Horizontal gene
genome reduction after intraamoebal culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
transfer of an entire metabolic pathway between a eukaryotic alga and its
108: 10296–10301.
DNA virus. Genome Res. 19: 1441–1449.
Deeg, C.M., Chow, C.-E.T., & Suttle, C.A. (2018) The kinetoplastid­
Mordecai, G.J., Verret, F., Highfield, A. et al. (2017) Schrödinger’s
infecting Bodo saltans virus (BsV), a window into the most abundant
Cheshire Cat: Are haploid Emiliania huxleyi cells resistant to viral infec­
giant viruses in the sea. Elife 7: e33014.
tion or not? Viruses 9: 51.
Fischer, M.G., Allen, M.J., Wilson, W.H., & Suttle, C.A. (2010) Giant
Nissimov, J.I., Napier, J.A., Allen, M.J., & Kimmance, S.A. (2016)
virus with a remarkable complement of genes infects marine zooplank­
Intragenus competition between coccolithoviruses: An insight on how a
ton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 107: 19508–19513.
select few can come to dominate many. Environ. Microbiol. 18: 133–145.
Fischer, M.G. & Suttle, C.A. (2011) A virophage at the origin of large
Nissimov, J.I., Pagarete, A., Ma, F. et al. (2017) Coccolithoviruses: A
DNA transposons. Science 332: 231–4.
review of cross-kingdom genomic thievery and metabolic thuggery.
Viruses 9: 52.
References 43

Forterre, P. (2010) Giant viruses: Conflicts in revisiting the virus concept. Wessner, D.R. (2010) Discovery of the giant mimivirus. Nat. Ed. 3: 61.
Intervirology 53: 362–378. Azam, F., Fenchel, T., & Field, J.G. (1983) The ecological role of water-
Koonin, E.V. & Yutin, N. (2010) Origin and evolution of eukaryotic large column microbes in the sea. Mar. Ecol.–Prog. Ser. 10: 257–262.
nucleo-cytoplasmic DNA viruses. Intervirology 53: 284–292. Cabanes, D.J.E., Norman, L., Santos-Echeandía, J. et al. (2017) First
La Scola, B., Desnues, C., Pagnier, I. et al. (2008) The virophage as a evaluation of the role of salp fecal pellets on iron biogeochemistry. Front.
unique parasite of the giant mimivirus. Nature 455: 100–4. Mar. Sci. 3: 289.
La Scola, B., Robert, C., Jungang, L. et al. (2003) A giant virus in amoe­ Carlson, C.A., del Giorgio, P.A., & Herndl, G.J. (2007) Microbes and
bae. Science 299: 2033. the dissipation of energy and respiration: From cells to ecosystems.
Oceanography 20: 89–100.
Santini, S., Jeudy, S., Bartoli, J. et al. (2013) Genome of Phaeocystis
globosa virus PgV–16T highlights the common ancestry of the largest Cermeño, P., Chouciño, P., Fernández-Castro, B. et al. (2016) Marine pri­
known DNA viruses infecting eukaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA mary productivity is driven by a selection effect. Front. Mar. Sci. 3: 173.
110: 10800–10805. Chisholm, S.W., Olson, R.J., Zettler, E.R. et al. (1988) A novel free-liv­
Sobhy, H. (2018) Virophages and their interactions with giant viruses and ing prochlorophyte abundant in the oceanic euphotic zone. Nature 334:
host cells. Proteomes 6: 23. 340–343.
Suzan-Monti, M., La Scola, B. & Raoult, D. (2006) Genomic and evolu­ Diaz, R.J. & Rosenberg, R. (2008) Spreading dead zones and conse­
tionary aspects of Mimivirus. Virus Res. 117: 145–155. quences for marine ecosystems. Science 321: 926–929.
Bell, P.J.L. (2001) Viral eukaryogenesis: Was the ancestor of the nucleus Dittmar, T. & Arnosti, C. An inseparable liaison: Marine microbes and
a complex DNA virus? J. Molec. Evol. 53: 251–256. nonliving organic matter. In: Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, 3rd edi­
tion (ed. Gasol, J.M. & Kirchman, D.L.), Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 189–288.
Bell, P. (2013) Meiosis: Its origin according to the viral eukaryogenesis
theory. In Meiosis. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/56876. Dutkiewicz, S., Hickman, A.E., Jahn, O. et al. (2019) Ocean colour signa­
ture of climate change. Nat. Commun. 10: 578.
Broecker, F. & Moelling, K. (2019) What viruses tell us about evolution
and immunity: Beyond Darwin? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1447: 53–68. Fenchel, T. The microbial loop—25 years later. J. Exp. Mar Bio. Ecol.
Chaikeeratisak, V., Nguyen, K., Khanna, K. et al. (2017) Assembly of a 366: 99–103.
nucleus-like structure during viral replication in bacteria. Science 355: Fuhrman, J.A. & Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure
194–197. of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters:
Evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol. 66: 109–120.
Claverie, J.M. (2006) Viruses take center stage in cellular evolution.
Genome Biol. 7, 110. Hansell, D.A. & Carlson, C.A. (eds.) (2014) Biogeochemistry of Marine
Dissolved Organic Matter. Academic Press.
Colson, P., De Lamballerie, X., Fournous, G., & Raoult, D. (2012)
Reclassification of giant viruses composing a fourth domain of life in the Henschke, N., Everett, J.D., Richardson, A.J., & Suthers, I.M. (2016)
new order Megavirales. Intervirology 55: 321–332. Rethinking the role of salps in the ocean. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31: 720–733.
Forterre, P. (2006) Three RNA cells for ribosomal lineages and three Herndl, G.J., Reinthaler, T., Teira, E. et al. (2005) Contribution of Archaea
DNA viruses to replicate their genomes: A hypothesis for the origin of to total prokaryotic production in the ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
cellular domain. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 3669–3674. 71: 2303–2309.
Forterre P. (2012) Virocell concept. In: The Encyclopedia of Life Science. Hirata, T., Aiken, J., Hardman-Mountford, N. et al. (2008) An absorp­
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. tion model to determine phytoplankton size classes from satellite ocean
colour. Remote Sensing Environ. 112: 3153–3159.
Forterre, P. (2013) The virocell concept and environmental microbiology.
ISME J. 7: 233–236. Hobbie, J.E., Daley, R.J., & Jasper, S. (1977) Use of nuclepore filters for
counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
Hutchinson, G.E. (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am. Nat. 95:
33: 1225.
137–145.
ICMS (2000) ICMS Ocean Productivity Study. Rutgers, The State
Koonin, E.V., Senkevich, T.G., & Dolja, V.V. (2006) The ancient Virus
University of New Jersey. Institute of Marine and Coastal sciences. http://
World and evolution of cells. Biol. Dir. 1: 29.
marine.rutgers.edu/opp/
Moelling, K. & Broecker, F. (2019) Viruses and evolution—Viruses first?
Iversen, M.H., Pakhomov, E.A., Hunt, B.P. et al. (2017) Sinkers or float­
A personal perspective. Front. Microbiol. 10: 523.
ers? Contribution from salp pellets to the export flux during a large bloom
Moreira, D. & López-García, P. (2009) Ten reasons to exclude viruses event in the Southern Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top Stud. Oceanogr.
from the tree of life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7: 306–311. 138: 116–125.
Reardon, S. (2017) Giant virus discovery sparks debate over tree of life. Jiao, N., Herndl, G.J., Hansell, D.A. et al. (2010) Microbial production
Nature News (online) doi: 10.1038/nature.2017.21798. of recalcitrant dissolved organic matter: Long-term carbon storage in the
Rosenwasser, S., Ziv, C., Van Creveld, S.G., & Vardi, A. (2016) Virocell global ocean. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8: 593–599.
metabolism: Metabolic innovations during host–virus interactions in the Jürgens, K. & Massana, R. (2008) Protistan grazing on marine bacte­
ocean. Trends Microbiol. 24: 821–832. rioplankton. In: Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, 2nd edition (ed.
Schulz, F., Yutin, N., Ivanova, N.N. et al. (2017) Giant viruses with an Kirchman, D.L.). Wiley, pp. 383–342.
expanded complement of translation system components. Science 356: Kolber, Z. (2007) Energy cycle in the ocean: Powering the microbial
82–85. world. Oceanography 20: 79–88.
Villarreal, L.P. (2004) Are viruses alive? Sci. Am. 291: 100–105. Laber, C.P., Hunter, J.E., Carvalho, F. et al. (2018) Coccolithovirus facili­
Villarreal, L.P. & DeFilippis, V.R. (2000) A hypothesis for DNA viruses tation of carbon export in the North Atlantic. Nat. Microbiol. 537–547.
as the origin of eukaryotic replication proteins. J. Virol. 74: 7079–7084. Legendre, L., Rivkin, R.B., Weinbauer, M.G. et al. (2015) The microbial
Villarreal, L.P. & Witzany, G. (2010) Viruses are essential agents within carbon pump concept: Potential biogeochemical significance in the glob­
the roots and stem of the tree of life. J. Theor. Biol. 262: 698–710. ally changing ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 134: 432–450.
44 References

Madin, L.P., Kremer, P., Wiebe, P.H. et al. (2006) Periodic swarms of the Zhang, C., Dang, H., Azam, F. et al. (2018) Evolving paradigms in bio­
salp Salpa aspera in the slope water off the NE United States: Biovolume, logical carbon cycling in the ocean. Natl. Sci. Rev. 5: 481–499.
vertical migration, grazing, and vertical flux. Deep-Sea Res. I: Oceanogr. Zubkov, M. & Hartmann, M. Ecological significance of microbial tro­
Res. Pap. 53: 804–819. phic mixing in the oligotrophic ocean: The Atlantic Ocean case stud­
Nagata, T. (2008) Organic matter-bacteria interactions in seawater. In: ies. In: Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, 3rd edition (ed. Gasol, J.M. &
Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, 2nd edition (ed. Kirchman, D.L.). Kirchman, D.L.), Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 99–122.
Wiley, pp. 207–242. Bhatia, M.P., Kujawinski, E.B., Das, S.B. et al. (2013) Greenland melt­
Pachiadaki, M.G., Sintes, E., Bergauer, K. et al. (2017) Major role of water as a significant and potentially bioavailable source of iron to the
nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in dark ocean carbon fixation. Science 358: ocean. Nat. Geosci. 6: 274–278.
1046–1051. Bonnain, C., Breitbart, M., & Buck, K.N. (2016) The Ferrojan Horse
Pernthaler, J. (2005) Predation on prokaryotes in the water column and its Hypothesis: Iron-virus interactions in the ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 3: 82.
ecological implications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3: 537–546. Boyd, P.W. & Vivian, C.M.G. (eds.) (2019a) High level review of a
Pernthaler, J. & Amann, R. (2005) Role and fate of heterotrophic microbes wide range of proposed marine geoengineering techniques. Rep. Stud.
in pelagic habitats: Focus on populations. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69: GESAMP 98: 144.
440–461. Boyd, P.W. & Vivian, C.M.G. (2019b) Should we fertilize oceans or seed
Pomeroy, L.R. (1974) The ocean’s food web: A changing paradigm. clouds? No one knows. Nature 570: 155.
Bioscience 24: 409–504. National Research Council (2015) Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide
Pomeroy, L.R., Williams, P.J.L., Azam, F., & Hobbie, J.E. (2007) The Removal and Reliable Sequestration. National Academies Press,
microbial loop. Oceanography 20: 28–33. Washington, DC.
Proctor, L.M. & Fuhrman, J.A. (1990) Viral mortality of marine-bacteria Ratnarajah, L., Nicol, S., & Bowie, A.R. (2018) Pelagic iron recycling
and cyanobacteria. Nature 343: 60–62. in the Southern Ocean: Exploring the contribution of marine animals.
Front. Mar. Sci. 5: 109.
Rahlff, J. (2019) The virioneuston: A review on viral–bacterial associa­
tions at air–water interfaces. Viruses 11: 191. Roman, J., Estes, J.A., Morissette, L. et al. (2014) Whales as marine eco­
system engineers. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12: 377–385.
Reinthaler, T., van Aken, H.M., & Herndl, G.J. (2010) Major contribution
of autotrophy to microbial carbon cycling in the deep North Atlantic’s Roman, J. & McCarthy, J.J. (2010) The whale pump: Marine mammals
interior. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 57: 1572–1580. enhance primary productivity in a coastal basin. PLoS One 5: e13255.
Richardson, T.L. (2019) Mechanisms and pathways of small-phytoplank­ Royal Society (2009) Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance
ton export from the surface ocean. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci.11: 57–74. and uncertainty. Online at https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/publica­
tions/2009/geoengineering-climate/ (accessed 5 July 2019).
Robinson, C. (2008) Heterotrophic bacterial respiration. In: Microbial
Ecology of the Oceans, 2nd edition (ed. Kirchman, D.L.). Wiley, pp. Rubin, M., Berman-Frank, I., & Shaked, Y. (2011) Dust-and mineral-iron
299–327. utilization by the marine dinitrogen-fixer Trichodesmium. Nat. Geosci.
4: 529.
Schiffer, J.M., Mael, L.E., Prather, K.A. et al. (2018) Sea spray aerosol:
Where marine biology meets atmospheric chemistry. ACS Central Sci. Shoenfelt, E.M., Sun, J., Winckler, G. et al. (2017) High particulate
4: 1617–1623. iron(II) content in glacially sourced dusts enhances productivity of a
model diatom. Sci. Adv. 3: e1700314.
Sherr, B.F., Sherr, E.B., & Pedrós-Alió, C. (1989) Simultaneous measure­
ment of bacterioplankton production and protozoan bacterivory in estua­ Smetacek, V. (2018) Seeing is believing: Diatoms and the ocean carbon
rine water. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.54: 209–219. cycle revisited. Protist 169: 791–802.
Sherr, E. & Sherr, B. (2008) Understanding roles of microbes in marine Smetacek, V., Klaas, C., Strass, V.H. et al. (2012) Deep carbon export from
pelagic food webs: A brief history. In: Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, a Southern Ocean iron-fertilized diatom bloom. Nature 487: 313–319.
2nd edition (ed. Kirchman, D.L.). Wiley, pp. 27–44. Smetacek, V. & Naqvi, S.W. (2008) The next generation of iron fertiliza­
Sutherland, K.R., Madin, L.P., & Stocker, R. (2010) Filtration of submi­ tion experiments in the Southern Ocean. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 366:
crometer particles by pelagic tunicates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107: 3957–3967.
15129–15134. Strong, A., Chisholm, S., Miller, C., & Cullen, J. (2009) Ocean fertiliza­
Suttle, C.A. (2007) Marine viruses—Major players in the global ecosys­ tion: Time to move on. Nature 461: 347–348.
tem. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5: 801–812. Tollefson, J. (2017) Iron-dumping ocean experiment sparks controversy.
Talmy, D., Beckett, S.J., Taniguchi, D.A. et al. (2019) An empirical model Nature 545: 393–394.
of carbon flow through marine viruses and microzooplankton grazers. Trick, C.G., Bill, B.D., Cochlan, W.P. et al. (2010) Iron enrichment stimu­
Environ. Microbiol. 21: 2171–2181. lates toxic diatom production in high-nitrate, low-chlorophyll areas. Proc.
Talmy, D., Beckett, S.J., Zhang, A.B. et al. (2019) Contrasting controls on Natl. Acad. Sci. 107: 5887–5882.
microzooplankton grazing and viral infection of microbial prey. Front. Tzubari, Y., Magnezi, L., Be’er, A., & Berman-Frank, I. (2018) Iron and
Mar. Sci. 6: 182. phosphorus deprivation induce sociality in the marine bloom-forming
Waterbury, J.B., Watson, S.W., Guillard, R.R.L., & Brand, L.E. (1979) cyanobacterium Trichodesmium. ISME J. 12: 1682–1693.
Widespread occurrence of a unicellular, marine, planktonic, cyanobacte­ Watson, A.J., Boyd, P.W., Turner, S.M. et al. (2008) Designing the next
rium. Nature 277: 293–294. generation of ocean iron fertilization experiments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
Wilhelm, S.W. & Suttle, C.A. (1999) Viruses and nutrient cycles in the 364: 303–309.
sea. Bioscience 49: 781–788. Weier, J. (2010) On the Shoulders of Giants (Obituary, John Martin).
Yamada, Y., Tomaru, Y., Fukuda, H., & Nagata, T. (2018) Aggregate for­ NASA Earth Observatory, online at https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/
mation during the viral lysis of a marine diatom. Front.Mar. Sci. 5: 167. features/Martin/martin_4.php (accessed 13 Sep 2019).
References 45

Yoon, J.-E., Yoo, K.-C., Macdonald, A.M. et al. (2018) Reviews and syn­ Messer, L.F., Mahaffey, C., Robinson, C. et al. (2016) High levels of het­
theses: Ocean iron fertilization experiments—Past, present, and future erogeneity in diazotroph diversity and activity within a putative hotspot
looking to a future Korean Iron Fertilization Experiment in the Southern for marine nitrogen fixation. ISME J. 10: 1499–1513.
Ocean (KIFES) project. Biogeoscience 15: 5847–5889. Muñoz-Marín, M.D.C., Shilova, I.N., Shi, T. et al. (2019) The transcrip­
Aumont, O., Maury, O., Lefort, S., & Bopp, L. (2018) Evaluating the tional cycle is suited to daytime N2 fixation in the unicellular cyanobacte­
potential impacts of the diurnal vertical migration by marine organisms rium “Candidatus Atelocyanobacterium thalassa” (UCYN-A). MBio 10:
on marine biogeochemistry. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 32: 1622–1643. e02495-18.
Benavides, M., Bonnet, S., Berman-Frank, I., & Riemann, L. (2018) Deep Otero, X.L., De La Peña-Lastra, S., Pérez-Alberti, A. et al. (2018) Seabird
into oceanic N2 fixation. Front. Mar. Sci. 5: 108. colonies as important global drivers in the nitrogen and phosphorus
Bertagnolli, A.D. & Stewart, F.J. (2018) Microbial niches in marine oxy­ cycles. Nat. Commun. 9: 246.
gen minimum zones. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16: 723–729. Pedersen, J.N., Bombar, D., Paerl, R.W., & Riemann, L. (2018)
Berube, P.M., Biller, S.J., Kent, A.G. et al. (2015) Physiology and evolu­ Diazotrophs and N2-fixation associated with particles in coastal estuarine
tion of nitrate acquisition in Prochlorococcus. ISME J. 9: 1195–1207. waters. Front. Microbiol. 9: 2759.

Bianchi, D., Babbin, A.R., & Galbraith, E.D. (2014) Enhancement of Shiozaki, T., Ijichi, M., Isobe, K. et al. (2016) Nitrification and its influ­
anammox by the excretion of diel vertical migrators. Proc. Natl. Acad. ence on biogeochemical cycles from the equatorial Pacific to the Arctic
Sci. USA 111: 15653–15658. Ocean. ISME J. 10: 2184–2197.

Breitburg, D., Levin, L.A., Oschlies, A. et al. (2018) Declining oxygen in Sun, X., Kop, L.F.M., Lau, M.C.Y. et al. (2019) Uncultured Nitrospina­
the global ocean and coastal waters. Science 359: eaam7240. like species are major nitrite oxidizing bacteria in oxygen minimum
zones. ISME J. 13: 2184–2197.
Caputo, A., Stenegren, M., Pernice, M.C., & Foster, R.A. (2018) A short
comparison of two marine planktonic diazotrophic symbioses highlights Ulloa, O., Canfield, D.E., DeLong, E.F. et al. (2012) Microbial ocean­
an un-quantified disparity. Front. Mar. Sci. 5: 2. ography of anoxic oxygen minimum zones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109:
15996–16003.
Chan, F., Barth, J.A., Lubchenco, J. et al. (2008) Emergence of anoxia in
the California current large marine ecosystem. Science 319: 920–920. Walworth, N.G., Fu, F.-X., Lee, M.D. et al. (2018) Nutrient-colimited
Trichodesmium as a nitrogen source or sink in a future ocean. Appl.
Dalsgaard, T., Thamdrup, B., Farías, L., & Revsbech, N.P. (2012) Environ. Microbiol. 84: e02137-17.
Anammox and denitrification in the oxygen minimum zone of the eastern
South Pacific. Limnol. Oceanogr. 57: 1331–1346. Wannicke, N., Frey, C., Law, C.S., & Voss, M. (2018) The response of
the marine nitrogen cycle to ocean acidification. Glob. Change Biol. 24:
Delmont, T.O., Quince, C., Shaiber, A. et al. (2018) Nitrogen-fixing pop­ 5031–5043.
ulations of Planctomycetes and Proteobacteria are abundant in surface
ocean metagenomes. Nat. Microbiol. 3: 804. Zehr, J.P. (2015) How single cells work together. Science 349: 1163–1164.

Farnelid, H., Turk-Kubo, K., Muñoz-Marín, M., & Zehr, J. (2016) New Zehr, J.P. & Kudela, R.M. (2011) Nitrogen cycle of the open ocean: From
insights into the ecology of the globally significant uncultured nitrogen- genes to ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 3: 197–225.
fixing symbiont UCYN-A. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 77: 125–138. Zehr, J.P., Shilova, I.N., Farnelid, H.M. et al. (2017) Unusual marine uni­
Foshtomi, M.Y., Braeckman, U., Derycke, S. et al. (2015) The link cellular symbiosis with the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium UCYN-A.
between microbial diversity and nitrogen cycling in marine sediments is Nat. Microbiol. 2: 16214.
modulated by macrofaunal bioturbation. PLoS One 10: e0130116. Zerkle, A.L. & Mikhail, S. (2017) The geobiological nitrogen cycle: From
Gruber, N. (2016) Elusive marine nitrogen fixation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. microbes to the mantle. Geobiology 15: 343–352.
USA 113: 4246–4248. Alcolombri, U., Ben-Dor, S., Feldmesser, E. et al. (2015) Identification of
Gruber, N. (2019) Consistent patterns of nitrogen fixation identified in the the algal dimethyl sulfide-releasing enzyme: A missing link in the marine
ocean. Nature 566: 191–193. sulfur cycle. Science 348: 1466–1469.

Hagino, K., Onuma, R., Kawachi, M., & Horiguchi, T. (2013) Discovery Amato, P., Joly, M., Besaury, L. et al. (2017) Active microorganisms
of an endosymbiotic nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium UCYN-A in thrive among extremely diverse communities in cloud water. PLoS One
Braarudosphaera bigelowii (Prymnesiophyceae). PLoS One 8: e81749. 12: e0182869.

Harding, K., Turk-Kubo, K.A., Sipler, R.E. et al. (2018) Symbiotic unicel­ Barak-Gavish, N., Frada, M.J., Ku, C. et al. (2018) Bacterial virulence
lular cyanobacteria fix nitrogen in the Arctic Ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. against an oceanic bloom-forming phytoplankter is mediated by algal
Sci. USA 115: 13371–13375. DMSP. Sci. Adv. 4: eaau5716.

Henke, B.A., Turk-Kubo, K.A., Bonnet, S., & Zehr, J.P. (2018) Bourne, D., Iida, Y., Uthicke, S., & Smith-Keune, C. (2007) Changes in
Distributions and abundances of sublineages of the N2-fixing cyanobacte­ coral-associated microbial communities during a bleaching event. ISME
rium “Candidatus Atelocyanobacterium thalassa” (UCYN-A) in the New J. 2: 350–363.
Caledonian coral lagoon. Front. Microbiol. 9: 554. Bullock, H.A., Luo, H., & Whitman, W.B. (2017) Evolution of dimeth­
Kuypers, M.M.M., Marchant, H.K., & Kartal, B. (2018) The microbial ylsulfoniopropionate metabolism in marine phytoplankton and bacteria.
nitrogen-cycling network. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16: 263–276. Front. Microbiol. 8: 637.

Laverock, B., Gilbert, J.A., Tait, K. et al. (2011) Bioturbation: Impact on Charlson, R.J., Lovelock, J.E., Andreae, M.O., & Warren, S.G. (1987)
the marine nitrogen cycle. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 39: 315–320. Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate.
Nature 326: 655–661.
Laverock, B., Smith, C.J., Tait, K. et al. (2010) Bioturbating shrimp alter
the structure and diversity of bacterial communities in coastal marine Curson, A.R.J., Liu, J., Bermejo Martínez, A. et al. (2017)
sediments. ISME J. 4: 1531–1544. Dimethylsulfoniopropionate biosynthesis in marine bacteria and identifi­
cation of the key gene in this process. Nat. Microbiol. 2: 17009.
Martiny, A.C., Kathuria, S., & Berube, P.M. (2009) Widespread meta­
bolic potential for nitrite and nitrate assimilation among Prochlorococcus Curson, A.R.J., Williams, B.T., Pinchbeck, B.J. et al. (2018) DSYB catal­
ecotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 10787–10792. yses the key step of dimethylsulfoniopropionate biosynthesis in many
phytoplankton. Nat. Microbiol. 3: 430–439.
46 References

Dell’Ariccia, G., Phillips, R.A., Van Franeker, J.A. et al. (2017) Comment Yoch, D.C. (2002) Dimethylsulfoniopropionate: Its sources, role in the
on “Marine plastic debris emits a keystone infochemical for olfactory for­ marine food web, and biological degradation to dimethylsulfide. Appl.
aging seabirds” by Savoca et al. Sci. Adv. 3: e1700526. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 5804–5815.
Evans, C., Malin, G., Wilson, W.H., & Liss, P.S. (2006) Infectious titers Dyhrman, S., Ammerman, J., & Van Mooy, B. (2007) Microbes and the
of Emiliania huxleyi virus 86 are reduced by exposure to millimolar marine phosphorus cycle. Oceanography 20: 110–116.
dimethyl sulfide and acrylic acid. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51: 2468–2471. Dyhrman, S.T. (2018) Microbial physiological ecology of the marine
Falkowski, P.G., Katz, M.E., Knoll, A.H. et al. (2004) The evolution of phosphorus cycle. In Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, 3rd edition (Gasol,
modern eukaryotic phytoplankton. Science 305: 354–360. J.M & Kirchman, D.L., eds.), Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 377–434.
Howard, E.C., Henriksen, J.R., Buchan, A. et al. (2006) Bacterial taxa White, A. & Dyhrman, S. (2013) The marine phosphorus cycle. Front.
that limit sulfur flux from the ocean. Science 314: 649–652. Microbiol. 4: 105.
Jones, G., Curran, M., Deschaseaux, E. et al. (2018) The flux and emis­ Baines, S.B., Twining, B.S., Brzezinski, M.A. et al. (2012) Significant sili­
sion of dimethylsulfide from the Great Barrier Reef region and potential con accumulation by marine picocyanobacteria. Nat. Geosci. 5: 886–891.
influence on the climate of NE Australia. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123: Conley, D.J., Frings, P.J., Fontorbe, G. et al. (2017) Biosilicification drives
13835–13856. a decline of dissolved Si in the oceans through geologic time. Front. Mar.
Lenton, T.M., Daines, S.J., Dyke, J.G. et al. (2018) Selection for Gaia Sci. 4: 397.
across multiple scales. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33: 633–645. Struyf, E., Smis, A., Van Damme, S. et al. (2009) The global biogeo­
Lenton, T.M. & Latour, B. (2018) Gaia 2.0. Science 361: 1066–1068. chemical silicon cycle. Silicon 1: 207–213.
Lidbury, I., Kröber, E., Zhang, Z. et al. (2016) A mechanism for bacterial Tang, T., Kisslinger, K., & Lee, C. (2014) Silicate deposition during
transformation of dimethylsulfide to dimethylsulfoxide: A missing link decomposition of cyanobacteria may promote export of picophytoplank­
in the marine organic sulfur cycle. Environ. Microbiol. 18: 2754–2766. ton to the deep ocean. Nat. Commun. 5: 4143.
Moran, M.A., Reisch, C.R., Kiene, R.P., & Whitman, W.B. (2012) Tréguer, P.J. & De La Rocha, C.L. (2013) The world ocean silica cycle.
Genomic insights into bacterial DMSP transformations. Ann. Rev. Mar. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 5: 477–501.
Sci. 4: 523–542. Arrigo, K.R. (2005) Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles.
Pančić, M. & Kiørboe, T. (2018) Phytoplankton defence mechanisms: Nature 437: 349–355.
Traits and trade-offs. Biol. Rev. 93: 1269–1303. Bristow, L.A., Mohr, W., Ahmerkamp, S., & Kuypers, M.M.M. (2017)
Quinn, P.K. & Bates, T.S. (2011) The case against climate regulation via Nutrients that limit growth in the ocean. Curr. Biol. 27: R474–R478.
oceanic phytoplankton sulphur emissions. Nature 480: 51–56. Hutchins, D.A. & Fu, F. (2017) Microorganisms and ocean global change.
Raina, J.B., Dinsdale, E.A., Willis, B.L., & Bourne, D.G. (2010) Do the Nat. Microbiol. 2: 17058.
organic sulfur compounds DMSP and DMS drive coral microbial asso­ Richardson, T.L. (2019) Mechanisms and pathways of small-phytoplank­
ciations? Trends Microbiol.18:101–108. ton export from the surface ocean. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 11: 57–74.
Raina, J.-B., Tapiolas, D.M., Forêt, S. et al. (2013) DMSP biosynthesis Schneider, S.H. (2004) Scientists Debate Gaia: The Next Century, MIT
by an animal and its role in coral thermal stress response. Nature 502: Press.
677–680.
Apprill, A. (2017) Marine animal microbiomes: Toward understanding
Raina, J.-B.B., Tapiolas, D., Willis, B.L., & Bourne, D.G. (2009) Coral- host–microbiome interactions in a changing ocean. Front. Mar.Sci. 4:
associated bacteria and their role in the biogeochemical cycling of sulfur. 222.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 3482–3501.
Bright, M. & Bulgheresi, S. (2010) A complex journey: Transmission of
Reisch, C.R., Moran, M.A., & Whitman, W.B. (2008) Dimethy microbial symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8: 218–230.
lsulfoniopropionate-dependent demethylase (DmdA) from Pelagibacter
ubique and Silicibacter pomeroyi. J. Bacteriol. 190: 8018–8024. Douglas, A.E. & Werren, J.H. (2016) Holes in the hologenome: Why host-
microbe symbioses are not holobionts. mBio 7: e02099-15.
Savoca, M.S. & Nevitt, G.A. (2014) Evidence that dimethyl sulfide facili­
tates a tritrophic mutualism between marine primary producers and top Duperron, S. (2017) Microbial Symbioses. ISTE Press/Elsevier, Oxford.
predators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 4157–4161. Fisher, R.M., Henry, L.M., Cornwallis, C.K. et al. (2017) The evolution of
Savoca, M.S., Wohlfeil, M.E., Ebeler, S.E., & Nevitt, G.A. (2016) Marine host-symbiont dependence. Nat. Commun. 8: 15973.
plastic debris emits a keystone infochemical for olfactory foraging sea­ Hurst, C.J. (ed.) (2016) The Mechanistic Benefits of Microbial Symbionts.
birds. Sci. Adv. 2: e1600395. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
Schiffer, J.M., Mael, L.E., Prather, K.A. et al. (2018) Sea spray aerosol: Margulis, L. (1991) Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innova­
Where marine biology meets atmospheric chemistry. ACS Central Sci. tion: Speciation and morphogenesis. In: Margulis, L., Fester, R., eds.
4: 1617–1623. Symbiogenesis and Symbionticism. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–14.
Seymour, J.R., Simó, R., Ahmed, T., & Stocker, R. (2010) Chemoattraction Moran, N.A. & Sloan, D.B. (2015) The hologenome concept: Helpful or
to dimethylsulfoniopropionate throughout the marine microbial food hollow? PLoS Biol. 13: e1002311.
web. Science 329: 342–345.
Morris J.J. (2018) What is the hologenome concept of evolution?
Vila-Costa, M., Pinhassi, J., Alonso, C. et al. (2007) An annual cycle F1000Research 7: 1664.
of dimethylsulfoniopropionate-sulfur and leucine assimilating bacte­
rioplankton in the coastal NW Mediterranean. Environ. Microbiol. 9: O’Brien, P.A., Webster, N.S., Miller, D.J., & Bourne, D.G. (2019) Host-
2451–2463. microbe coevolution: Applying evidence from model systems to complex
marine invertebrate holobionts. MBio 10: e02241-18.
Wang, R., Gallant, É., & Seyedsayamdost, M.R. (2016) Investigation
of the genetics and biochemistry of roseobacticide production in the Raina, J.B., Eme, L., Pollock, F.J. et al. (2018) Symbiosis in the microbial
Roseobacter clade bacterium Phaeobacter inhibens. MBio 7: e02118. world: From ecology to genome evolution. Biol. Open 7: bio032524.
References 47

Rosenberg, E., Koren, O., Reshef, L. et al. (2007) The role of microor­ Klose, J., Polz, M.F., Wagner, M. et al. (2015) Endosymbionts escape dead
ganisms in coral health, disease and evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5: hydrothermal vent tubeworms to enrich the free-living population. Proc.
355–362. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 112: 11300–11305.
Rosenberg, E. & Zilber-Rosenberg, I. (2018) The hologenome concept of König, S., Gros, O., Heiden, S.E. et al. (2016) Nitrogen fixation in a che­
evolution after 10 years. Microbiome 6: 78. moautotrophic lucinid symbiosis. Nat. Microbiol. 2: 16193.
Schwartzman, J.A. & Ruby, E.G. (2016) Stress as a normal cue in the König, S., Le Guyader, H., & Gros, O. (2015) Thioautotrophic bacte­
symbiotic environment. Trends Microbiol. 24: 414–424. rial endosymbionts are degraded by enzymatic digestion during starva­
tion: Case study of two lucinids Codakia orbicularis and C. orbiculata.
Assié, A., Borowski, C., van der Heijden, K. et al. (2016) A specific and
Microsc. Res. Tech. 78: 173–179.
widespread association between deep-sea bathymodiolus mussels and
a novel family of epsilonproteobacteria. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 8: Li, Y., Liles, M.R., & Halanych, K.M. (2018) Endosymbiont genomes
805–813. yield clues of tubeworm success. ISME J. 12: 2785–2795.
Batstone, R.T., Laurich, J.R., Salvo, F., & Dufour, S.C. (2014) Divergent Mariño, J., Augustine, S., Dufour, S.C., & Hurford, A. (2018) Dynamic
chemosymbiosis-related characters in Thyasira cf. gouldi (Bivalvia: Energy Budget theory predicts smaller energy reserves in thyasirid
Thyasiridae). PLoS One 9: e92856. bivalves that harbour symbionts. J. Sea Res.143: 119–127.
Chen, C., Rogers, A.D., Linse, K. et al. (2015) The “scaly-foot gastro­ Mcmullin, E.R., Hourdez, S., Schaeffer, S.W., & Fisher, C.R. (2003)
pod”: A new genus and species of hydrothermal vent-endemic gastropod Phylogeny and biogeography of deep sea vestimentiferan tubeworms and
(Neomphalina: Peltospiridae) from the Indian Ocean. J. Mollusc. Stud. their bacterial symbionts. Symbiosis 34: 1–41.
81: 322–334. Nussbaumer, A.D., Fisher, C.R., & Bright, M. (2006) Horizontal endo­
Dubilier, N., Bergin, C., & Lott, C. (2008) Symbiotic diversity in marine symbiont transmission in hydrothermal vent tubeworms. Nature 441:
animals: The art of harnessing chemosynthesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6: 345–348.
725–740. Petersen, J.M., Kemper, A., Gruber-Vodicka, H. et al. (2017)
Dubilier, N., Mulders, C., Ferdelman, T. et al. (2001) Endosymbiotic sul­ Chemosynthetic symbionts of marine invertebrate animals are capable of
phate-reducing and sulphide-oxidizing bacteria in an oligochaete worm. nitrogen fixation. Nat. Microbiol. 2: 16195.
Nature 411: 298–302. Pflugfelder, B., Cary, S.C., & Bright, M. (2009) Dynamics of cell prolif­
Dufour, S.C. & Felbeck, H. (2003) Sulphide mining by the superextensile eration and apoptosis reflect different life strategies in hydrothermal vent
foot of symbiotic thyasirid bivalves. Nature 426: 65–67. and cold seep vestimentiferan tubeworms. Cell Tissue Res. 337: 149–165.
Dufour, S.C., Laurich, J.R., Batstone, R.T. et al. (2014) Magnetosome­ Robidart, J.C., Bench, S.R., Feldman, R.A. et al. (2008) Metabolic ver­
containing bacteria living as symbionts of bivalves. ISME J. 8: 2453–2462. satility of the Riftia pachyptila endosymbiont revealed through metage­
nomics. Environ. Microbiol. 10: 727–737.
Duperron, S., Gaudron, S.M., Rodrigues, C.F. et al. (2013) An overview
of chemosynthetic symbioses in bivalves from the North Atlantic and Sayavedra, L., Ansorge, R., Rubin-Blum, M. et al. (2019) Horizontal
Mediterranean Sea. Biogeoscience 10: 3241–3267. acquisition followed by expansion and diversification of toxin-related
genes in deep-sea bivalve symbionts. BioRxiv 505386.
Goffredi, S.K., Jones, W.J., Erhlich, H. et al. (2008) Epibiotic bacteria
associated with the recently discovered Yeti crab, Kiwa hirsuta. Environ. Sayavedra, L., Kleiner, M., Ponnudurai, R. et al. (2015) Abundant toxin-
Microbiol. 10: 2623–2634. related genes in the genomes of beneficial symbionts from deep-sea
hydrothermal vent mussels. eLife 4: e07966.
Grzymski, J.J., Murray, A.E., Campbell, B.J. et al. (2008) Metagenome
analysis of an extreme microbial symbiosis reveals eurythermal adap­ Stewart, F.J., Newton, I.L.G., & Cavanaugh, C.M. (2005) Chemosynthetic
tation and metabolic flexibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: endosymbioses: Adaptations to oxic-anoxic interfaces. Trends Microbiol.
17516–17521. 13: 439–448.
Harmer, T.L., Rotjan, R.D., Nussbaumer, A.D. et al. (2008) Free-living Thurber, A.R., Jones, W.J., & Schnabel, K. (2011) Dancing for food in the
tube worm endosymbionts found at deep-sea vents. Appl. Environ. deep sea: Bacterial farming by a new species of yeti crab. PLoS ONE 6:
Microbiol. 6: 3895–3898. e26243.
Heide, T. van der, Govers, L.L., de Fouw, J. et al. (2012) A three-stage Warén, A., Bengtson, S., Goffredi, S.K., & Van Dover, C.L. (2003) A
symbiosis forms the foundation of seagrass ecosystems. Science 336: hot-vent gastropod with iron sulfide dermal sclerites. Science 302: 1007.
1432–1434. Wentrup, C., Wendeberg, A., Schimak, M. et al. (2014) Forever compe­
Higgs, N.D., Newton, J., & Attrill, M.J. (2016) Caribbean spiny lobster tent: Deep-sea bivalves are colonized by their chemosynthetic symbionts
fishery is underpinned by trophic subsidies from chemosynthetic primary throughout their lifetime. Environ. Microbiol. 16: 3699–3713.
production. Curr. Biol. 26: 3393–3398. Woyke, T., Teeling, H., Ivanova, N.N. et al. (2006) Symbiosis insights
Jäckle, O., Seah, B.K., Tietjen, M. et al. (2019) Chemosynthetic symbi­ through metagenomic analysis of a microbial consortium. Nature 443:
ont with a drastically reduced genome serves as primary energy storage 950–955.
in the marine flatworm Paracatenula. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116: Yao, H., Dao, M., Imholt, T. et al. (2010) Protection mechanisms of the
8505–8514. iron-plated armor of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent gastropod. Proc. Natl.
Kleiner, M., Woyke, T., Ruehland, C., & Dubilier, N. (2011) The Olavius Acad. Sci. USA 107: 987–992.
algarvensis metagenome revisited: Lessons learned from the analysis Danise, S. & Higgs, N.D. (2015) Bone-eating Osedax worms lived on
of the low-diversity microbial consortium of a gutless marine worm. In Mesozoic marine reptile deadfalls. Biol. Lett. 11: 20150072.
Handbook of Molecular Microbial Ecology II. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
Hoboken, NJ, pp. 319–333. Little, C.T. (2017) The prolific afterlife of whales. Sci. Am. 26: 14–19.
Klose, J., Aistleitner, K., Horn, M. et al. (2016) Trophosome of the Deep- Ristova, P.P., Bienhold, C., Wenzhöfer, F. et al. (2017) Temporal and spa­
sea tubeworm Riftia pachyptila inhibits bacterial growth. PLoS One 11: tial variations of bacterial and faunal communities associated with deep-
e0146446. sea wood falls. PLoS ONE 12: e.0169906.
Smith, C.R. & Baco, A.R. (2003) Ecology of whale falls at the deep-sea
floor. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 41: 311–354.
48 References

Anderson, C.M. & Haygood, M.G. (2007) α-proteobacterial symbionts of Hughes, T.P., Barnes, M.L., Bellwood, D.R. et al. (2017) Coral reefs in the
marine bryozoans in the genus Watersipora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Anthropocene. Nature 546: 82–90.
73: 303–311. Hughes, T.P., Kerry, J.T., Baird, A.H. et al. (2018) Global warming trans­
Evans, J.S., Erwin, P.M., Shenkar, N., & López-Legentil, S. (2018) A forms coral reef assemblages. Nature 556: 492–496.
comparison of prokaryotic symbiont communities in nonnative and LaJeunesse, T.C., Parkinson, J.E., Gabrielson, P.W. et al. (2018) Systematic
native ascidians from reef and harbor habitats. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. revision of Symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of
94: fiy139. coral endosymbionts. Curr. Biol. 28: 2570–2580.
Fieseler, L., Horn, M., Wagner, M., & Hentschel, U. (2004) Discovery Morris, L.A., Voolstra, C.R. Quigley, K.M. et al. (2019) Nutrient avail­
of the novel candidate phylum “Poribacteria” in marine sponges. Appl. ability and metabolism affect the stability of coral-Symbiodiniaceae
Environ. Microbiol. 70: 3724–3732. symbioses. Trends Microbiol. 27: 678–689.
Karagodina, N.P., Vishnyakov, A.E., Kotenko, A.L. et al. (2018) NAS (2019) National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine.
Ultrastructural evidence for nutritional relationships between a marine A Research Review of Interventions to Increase the Persistence and
colonial invertebrate (Bryozoa) and its bacterial symbionts. Symbiosis 75: Resilience of Coral Reefs. The National Academies Press, Washington,
155–164. DC.
López-Legentil, S., Turon, X., Espluga, R., & Erwin, P.M. (2015) Neave, M.J., Rachmawati, R., Xun, L. et al. (2017) Differential specificity
Temporal stability of bacterial symbionts in a temperate ascidian. Front. between closely related corals and abundant Endozoicomonas endosym­
Microbiol. 6: 1022. bionts across global scales. ISME J. 11: 186–200.
Moitinho-Silva, L., Nielsen, S., Amir, A. et al. (2017) The sponge micro- Pochon, X., Putnam, H.M., & Gates, R.D. (2014) Multi-gene analysis of
biome project. GigaScience 6: 1–7. Symbiodinium dinoflagellates: A perspective on rarity, symbiosis, evolu­
Pita, L., Rix, L., Slaby, B.M. et al. (2018) The sponge holobiont in a tion. PeerJ 2: e394.
changing ocean: From microbes to ecosystems. Microbiome 6: 46. Pollock, F.J., McMinds, R., Smith, S. et al. (2018) Coral-associated bacte­
Schmitt, S., Tsai, P., Bell, J. et al. (2012) Assessing the complex sponge ria demonstrate phylosymbiosis and cophylogeny. Nat. Commun. 9: 4921.
microbiota: Core, variable and species-specific bacterial communities in Raghukumar, S. (2017) Fungi in Coastal and Oceanic Marine
marine sponges. ISME J. 6: 564–576. Ecosystems: Marine Fungi. Springer International.
Schreiber, L., Kjeldsen, K.U., Funch, P. et al. (2016) Endozoicomonas are Rohwer, F., Seguritan, V., Azam, F., & Knowlton, N. (2002) Diversity and
specific, facultative symbionts of sea squirts. Front. Microbiol. 7: 1042. distribution of coral-associated bacteria. Marine Ecol. Prog. Ser. 243:
Taylor, M.W., Tsai, P., Simister, R.L. et al. (2013) “Sponge-specific” bac­ 1–10.
teria are widespread (but rare) in diverse marine environments. ISME J. Rohwer, F. & Youle, M. (2010) Coral Reefs in Microbial Seas. Plaid
7: 438–443. Press, San Diego.
Thomas, T., Moitinho-Silva, L., Lurgi, M. et al. (2016) Diversity, struc­ Torda, G., Donelson, J.M., Aranda, M. et al. (2017) Rapid adaptive
ture and convergent evolution of the global sponge microbiome. Nat. responses to climate change in corals. Nat. Clim. Change 7: 627.
Commun. 7: 11870.
van de Water, J.A.J.M., Allemand, D., & Ferrier-Pagès, C. (2018) Host-
Ainsworth, T.D., Krause, L., Bridge, T. et al. (2015) The coral core micro- microbe interactions in octocoral holobionts - recent advances and per­
biome identifies rare bacterial taxa as ubiquitous endosymbionts. ISME J. spectives. Microbiome 6: 64.
9: 2261–2274.
van de Water, J.A.J.M., Melkonian, R., Junca, H. et al. (2016) Spirochaetes
Blackall, L.L., Wilson, B., & Oppen, M.J.H. van (2015) Coral—The dominate the microbial community associated with the red coral
world’s most diverse symbiotic ecosystem. Mol. Ecol. 24: 5330–5347. Corallium rubrum on a broad geographic scale. Sci. Rep. 6: 27277.
Bourne, D.G., Morrow, K.M., & Webster, N.S. (2016) Insights into the van Oppen, M.J.H., Oliver, J.K., Putnam, H.M., & Gates, R.D. (2015)
coral microbiome: Underpinning the health and resilience of reef ecosys­ Building coral reef resilience through assisted evolution. Proc. Natl.
tems. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 70: 317–340. Acad. Sci. 112: 2307–2313.
Callahan, B.J., McMurdie, P.J., & Holmes, S.P. (2017) Exact sequence Wada, N., Ishimochi, M., Matsui, T. et al. (2019) Characterization of
variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data coral-associated microbial aggregates (CAMAs) within tissues of the
analysis. ISME J. 11: 2639. coral Acropora hyacinthus. Biorxiv, BioRxiv: 576488.
Davy, S.K., Allemand, D., & Weis, V.M. (2012) Cell biology of cnidarian­ Wada, N., Pollock, F.J., Willis, B.L. et al. (2016) In situ visualization
dinoflagellate symbiosis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 76: 229–61. of bacterial populations in coral tissues: Pitfalls and solutions. PeerJ 4:
Donelson, J.M., Salinas, S., Munday, P.L., & Shama, L.N.S. (2018) e2424.
Transgenerational plasticity and climate change experiments: Where do Webster, N.S. & Reusch, T.B.H. (2017) Microbial contributions to the
we go from here? Glob. Change Biol. 24: 13–34. persistence of coral reefs. ISME J. 11: 2167–2174.
Fine, M. & Loya, Y. (2002) Endolithic algae: An alternative source of pho­ Wegley, L., Edwards, R., Rodriguez-Brito, B. et al. (2007) Metagenomic
toassimilates during coral bleaching. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 269: 1205–1210. analysis of the microbial community associated with the coral Porites
Hernandez-Agreda, A., Gates, R.D., & Ainsworth, T.D. (2017) Defining astreoides. Environ. Microbiol. 9: 2707–2719.
the core microbiome in corals’ microbial soup. Trends Microbiol. 25: Wooldridge, S.A. (2010) Is the coral-algae symbiosis really “mutually
125–140. beneficial” for the partners? BioEssays 32: 615–625.
Hernandez-Agreda, A., Leggat, W., Bongaerts, P., & Ainsworth, T.D. Kellogg, C.A., Goldsmith, D.B., & Gray, M.A. (2017) Biogeographic
(2016) The microbial signature provides insight into the mechanistic basis comparison of Lophelia-associated bacterial communities in the western
of coral success across reef habitats. MBio 7: e00560-16. Atlantic reveals conserved core microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 8: 796.
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Hughes, T., Antoiony, K. et al. (2009) Coral reefs Kellogg, C.A., Lisle, J.T., & Galkiewicz, J.P. (2009) Culture-independent
and rapid climate change: Impacts, risks and implications for tropical characterization of bacterial communities associated with the cold-
societies. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 6: 302004. water coral Lophelia pertusa in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 75: 2294–2303.
References 49

Middelburg, J.J., Mueller, C.E., Veuger, B. et al., (2015) Discovery of McCallum, H.I., Kuris, A., Harvell, C.D. et al. (2004) Does terrestrial
symbiotic nitrogen fixation and chemoautotrophy in cold-water corals. epidemiology apply to marine systems? Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 585–591.
Sci. Rep. 5: 17962. Munn, C.B. (2006) Viruses as pathogens of marine organisms—from
Penn, K., Wu, D., Eisen, J.A., & Ward, N. (2006) Characterization of bacteria to whales. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 86: 1–15.
bacterial communities associated with deep-sea corals on Gulf of Alaska Pitlik, S.D. & Koren, O. (2017) How holobionts get sick—toward a unify­
seamounts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 1680–1683. ing scheme of disease. Microbiome 5: 64.
Röthig, T., Yum, L.K., Kremb, S.G., et al. (2017) Microbial community Starr, M., Lair, S., Michaud, S. et al. (2017) Multispecies mass mortality
composition of deep-sea corals from the Red Sea provides insight into of marine fauna linked to a toxic dinoflagellate bloom. PLoS One 12:
functional adaption to a unique environment. Sci. Rep. 7: 44714. e0176299.
Haygood, M.G. (1993) Light organ symbioses in fishes. Crit. Rev. Takemura, A.F., Chien, D.M., & Polz, M.F. (2014) Associations and
Microbiol. 19: 191–216. dynamics of Vibrionaceae in the environment, from the genus to the
Hellinger, J., Jägers, P., Donner, M. et al. (2017) The flashlight fish population level. Front. Microbiol. 5: 38.
Anomalops katoptron uses bioluminescent light to detect prey in the dark. Austin, B., Austin, D., Sutherland, R. et al. (2005) Pathogenicity of vib­
PLOS ONE 12: e0170489. rios to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum) and Artemia nau­
Hendry, T.A. & Dunlap, P.V. (2011) The uncultured luminous symbiont plii. Environ. Microbiol. 7: 1488–1495.
of Anomalops katoptron (Beryciformes: Anomalopidae) represents a new Ben-Haim, Y. & Rosenberg, E. (2002) A novel Vibrio sp. pathogen of the
bacterial genus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 61: 841–843. coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar. Biol. 141: 47–55.
Hendry, T.A. & Dunlap, P. V (2014) Phylogenetic divergence between the Ben-Haim, Y., Zicherman-Keren, M., & Rosenberg, E. (2003)
obligate luminous symbionts of flashlight fishes demonstrates specificity Temperature-regulated bleaching and lysis of the coral Pocillopora
of bacteria to host genera. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 6: 331–8. damicornis by the novel pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus. Appl. Environ.
Hendry, T.A., Freed, L.L., Fader, D. et al. (2018) Ongoing transposon­ Microbiol. 69: 4236–4242.
mediated genome reduction in the luminous bacterial symbionts of deep- Bourne, D.G., Boyett, H. V, Henderson, M.E. et al. (2008) Identification
sea ceratioid anglerfishes. MBio 9: e01033-18. of a ciliate (Oligohymenophorea: Scuticociliatia) associated with
McAnulty, S.J. & Nyholm, S.V. (2017) The role of hemocytes in the brown band disease on corals of the Great Barrier Reef. Appl. Environ.
Hawaiian bobtail squid, Euprymna scolopes: A model organism for Microbiol. 74: 883–888.
studying beneficial host-microbe interactions. Front. Microbiol. 7: 2013. Cárdenas, A., Neave, M.J., Haroon, M.F. et al. (2018) Excess labile carbon
McFall-Ngai, M. (2014) Divining the essence of symbiosis: Insights from promotes the expression of virulence factors in coral reef bacterioplank­
the squid-vibrio model. PLoS Biol. 12: e1001783. ton. ISME J. 12: 59–76.
Nawroth, J.C., Guo, H., Koch, E. et al. (2017) Motile cilia create fluid- Corinaldesi, C., Marcellini, F., Nepote, E. et al. (2018) Impact of inor­
mechanical microhabitats for the active recruitment of the host microbi­ ganic UV filters contained in sunscreen products on tropical stony corals
ome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.114: 9510–9516. (Acropora spp.). Sci. Total Environ. 637–638: 1279–1285.
Norsworthy, A.N. & Visick, K.L. (2013) Gimme shelter: How Vibrio Danovaro, R., Bongiorni, L., Corinaldesi, C. et al. (2008) Sunscreens
fischeri successfully navigates an animal’s multiple environments. Front. cause coral bleaching by promoting viral infections. Environ. Health
Microbiol. 4: 356. Perspect. 116: 441–447.
Nyholm, S.V. & McFall-Ngai, M.J. (2004) The winnowing: Establishing Davy, S.K., Burchett, S.G., Dale, A.L. et al. (2006) Viruses: agents of
the squid-vibrio symbiosis. Nat. Rev. Micriobiol. 2: 632–642. coral disease? Dis. Aquat. Organ. 69: 101–110.
Nyholm, S.V., Stabb, E.V., Ruby, E.G., & McFall-Ngai, M.J. (2000) Downs, C.A., Kramarsky-Winter, E., Segal, R. et al. (2016)
Establishment of an animal–bacterial association: Recruiting sym­ Toxicopathological effects of the sunscreen UV filter, oxybenzone (ben­
biotic vibrios from the environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: zophenone-3), on coral planulae and cultured primary cells and its envi­
10231–10235. ronmental contamination in Hawaii and the US Virgin Islands. Arch.
Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 70: 265–288.
Baskin, Y. (2006) Sea sickness: the upsurge in marine diseases.
Bioscience 56: 464–469. FFWC (2019) Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Stony
Coral Tissue Loss Disease. Online at: https://myfwc.com/research/hab
Burge, C.A., Friedman, C.S., Getchell, R. et al. (2016) Complementary
itat/coral/disease/ (accessed 4 July 2019).
approaches to diagnosing marine diseases: a union of the modern and the
classic. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371: 20150207. FKNMS (2018) Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Case
Definition: Stony Coral Tissue Loss Disease (SCTLD). Online at: https
Burge, C.A., Mark Eakin, C., Friedman, C.S. et al. (2014) Climate change
://nmsfloridakeys.blob.core.windows.net/floridakeys-prod/media/docs/20
influences on marine infectious diseases: implications for management
181002-stony-coral-tissue-loss-disease-case-definition.pdf (accessed 4
and society. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 6: 249–277.
July 2019).
Casadevall, A. & Pirofski, L. (2014) Microbiology: ditch the term patho­
Garren, M., Son, K., Raina, J.-B. et al. (2014) A bacterial pathogen uses
gen. Nature 516: 165–166.
dimethylsulfoniopropionate as a cue to target heat-stressed corals. ISME
Kasai, H., Nishikawa, S., & Watanabe, K. (2018) Viral diseases affecting J. 8: 999–1007.
aquaculture. In: Seafood Safety and Quality, Bari, Md.L. & Yamakzaki,
Garren, M., Son, K., Tout, J. et al. (2016) Temperature-induced behavioral
K. (eds.), CRC Press, pp. 112–128.
switches in a bacterial coral pathogen. ISME J. 10: 1363–1372.
Lafferty, K.D. (2009) The ecology of climate change and infectious dis­
Gavish, A.R., Shapiro, O.H., Kramarsky-Winter, E., & Vardi, A. (2018)
eases. Ecology 90: 888–900.
Microscale tracking of coral disease reveals timeline of infection and het­
Lafferty, K.D. (2017) Marine infectious disease ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. erogeneity of polyp fate. bioRxiv, 302778.
Evol. Syst. 48: 473–496.
Gibbin, E., Gavish, A., Domart-Coulon, I. et al. (2018) Using NanoSIMS
Lafferty, K.D., Porter, J.W., & Ford, S.E. (2004) Are diseases increasing coupled with microfluidics to visualize the early stages of coral infection
in the ocean? Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. System. 35: 31–54. by Vibrio coralliilyticus. BMC Microbiol. 18: 39.
50 References

Gibbin, E., Gavish, A., Krueger, T. et al. (2019) Vibrio coralliilyti­ Montalvo-Proaño, J., Buerger, P., Weynberg, K.D., & van Oppen, M.J.H.
cus infection triggers a behavioural response and perturbs nutritional (2017) A PCR-Based assay targeting the major capsid protein gene of
exchange and tissue integrity in a symbiotic coral. ISME J. 13: 989–1003. a dinorna-like ssRNA virus that infects coral photosymbionts. Front.
Hallegraeff, G., Coman, F., Davies, C. et al. (2014) Australian dust storm Microbiol. 8: 1665.
associated with extensive Aspergillus sydowii fungal “bloom” in coastal Munn, C.B. (2015) The role of vibrios in diseases of corals. Microbiol.
waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80: 3315–3320. Spectr. 3: doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VE-0006-2014.
Harvell, C.D., Montecino-Latorre, D., Caldwell, J.M. et al. (2019) Disease Mydlarz, L.D., Holthouse, S.F., Peters, E.C., & Harvell, C.D. (2008)
epidemic and a marine heat wave are associated with the continental- Cellular responses in sea fan corals: granular amoebocytes react to patho­
scale collapse of a pivotal predator (Pycnopodia helianthoides). Sci. Adv. gen and climate stressors. PLoS One 3: e1811.
5: eaau7042.
Nissimov, J., Rosenberg, E., & Munn, C.B. (2009) Antimicrobial prop­
Hewson, I., Bistolas, K.S.I., Quijano Cardé et al. (2018) Investigating the erties of resident coral mucus bacteria of Oculina patagonica. FEMS
complex association between viral ecology, environment, and Northeast Microbiol. Lett. 292: 210–215.
Pacific sea star wasting. Front. Mar. Sci. 5: 77.
Page, C. & Willis, B. Epidemiology of skeletal eroding band on the Great
Hewson, I., Button, J.B., Gudenkauf, B.M. et al. (2014) Densovirus asso­ Barrier Reef and the role of injury in the initiation of this widespread
ciated with sea-star wasting disease and mass mortality. Proc. Natl. coral disease. Coral Reefs 27: 257–272.
Acad. Sci. USA 111: 17278–17283. Pascelli, C., Laffy, P.W., Kupresanin, M. et al. (2018) Morphological char­
Hoff, M. (2007) What’s behind the spread of white syndrome in Great acterization of virus-like particles in coral reef sponges. PeerJ 6: e5625.
Barrier Reef corals? PLoS Biol. 5: e164.
Patterson, K.L., Porter, J.W., Ritchie, K.E. et al. (2002) The etiology of
Huggett, M.J. & Apprill, A. (2019) Coral microbiome database: integra­ white pox, a lethal disease of the Caribbean elkhorn coral, Acropora pal­
tion of sequences reveals high diversity and relatedness of coral‐associ­ mata. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99: 8725–8730.
ated microbes. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 11: 372–385. Pita, L., Rix, L., Slaby, B.M. et al. (2018) The sponge holobiont in a
Kimes, N.E., Grim, C.J., Johnson, W.R. et al. (2012) Temperature regula­ changing ocean: from microbes to ecosystems. Microbiome 6: 46.
tion of virulence factors in the pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus. ISME J. Pollock, F.J., Wada, N., Torda, G. et al. (2017) White syndrome-affected
6: 835–846. corals have a distinct microbiome at disease lesion fronts. Appl. Environ.
Lawrence, S.A., Floge, S.A., Davy, J.E. et al. (2017) Exploratory analy­ Microbiol. 83: e02799-16.
sis of Symbiodinium transcriptomes reveals potential latent infection by Precht, W.F., Gintert, B.E., Robbart, M.L. et al. (2016) Unprecedented
large dsDNA viruses. Environ. Microbiol. 19: 3909–3919. disease-related coral mortality in Southeastern Florida. Sci. Rep. 6:
Lesser, M.P., Bythell, J.C., Gates, R.D. et al. (2007) Are infectious dis­ 31374.
eases really killing corals? Alternative interpretations of the experimen­ Reshef, L., Koren, O., Loya, Y. et al. (2006) The Coral probiotic hypoth­
tal and ecological data. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 346: 36–44. esis. Environ. Microbiol. 8: 2068–2073.
Lohr, J., Munn, C.B., & Wilson, W.H. (2007) Characterization of a Reshef, L., Ron, E., & Rosenberg, E. (2008) Genome analysis of the coral
latent virus-like infection of symbiotic zooxanthellae. Appl. Environ. bleaching pathogen Vibrio shiloi. Arch. Microbiol. 190: 185–194.
Microbiol. 73: 2976–2981.
Richardson, L.L. (1998) Coral diseases: what is really known? Trends
Luter, H.M. (2017) Sponge disease and climate change. In: Climate Ecol. Evol. 13: 438–443.
Change, Ocean Acidification and Sponges, Carballo, J.L. & Bell, J.J.
(eds.), Springer, Cham, pp. 411–428. Rosenberg, E., Kushmaro, A., Kramarsky-Winter, E. et al. (2009) The
role of microorganisms in coral bleaching. ISME J. 3: 139–146.
Luter, H.M., Bannister, R.J., Whalan, S. et al. (2017) Microbiome analy­
sis of a disease affecting the deep-sea sponge Geodia barretti. FEMS Rypien, K. & Baker, D. (2009) Isotopic labeling and antifungal resistance
Microbiol. Ecol. 93: fix074. as tracers of gut passage of the sea fan pathogen Aspergillus sydowii. Dis.
Aquat. Organ. 86: 1–7.
Mera, H. & Bourne, D.G. (2018) Disentangling causation: complex roles
of coral-associated microorganisms in disease. Environ. Microbiol. 20: Rypien, K.L. (2008) African dust is an unlikely source of Aspergillus
431–449. sydowii, the causative agent of sea fan disease. Mar. Ecol. Ser. 367:
125–131.
Meron, D., Efrony, R., Johnson, W.R., et al. (2009) Role of flagella in
virulence of the coral pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus. Appl. Environ. Rypien, K.L., Andras, J.P., & Harvell, C.D. (2008) Globally panmictic
Microbiol. 75: 5704–5707. population structure in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus
sydowii. Mol. Ecol. 17: 4068–4078.
Meyer, J.L., Castellanos-Gell, J., Aeby, G.S. et al. (2019) Microbial com­
munity shifts associated with the ongoing stony coral tissue loss disease Santos, E. de O., Alves, N., Dias, G.M. et al. (2011) Genomic and pro­
outbreak on the Florida Reef Tract. bioRxiv, 626408. teomic analyses of the coral pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus reveal a
diverse virulence repertoire. ISME J. 5: 1471–1483.
Miller, M.W., Karazsia, J., Groves, C.E. et al. (2016) Detecting sedimen­
tation impacts to coral reefs resulting from dredging the Port of Miami, Sato, Y., Civiello, M., Bell, S.C. et al. (2016) Integrated approach to
Florida USA. PeerJ 4: e2711. understanding the onset and pathogenesis of black band disease in corals.
Environ. Microbiol. 18: 752–765.
Mills, E., Shechtman, K., Loya, Y., & Rosenbergg, I. (2013) Bacteria
appear to play important roles in both causing and preventing the bleach­ Sato, Y., Ling, E.Y.S., Turaev, D. et al. (2017) Unraveling the microbial
ing of the coral Oculina patagonica. Mar. Eco. Prog. Ser. 489: 155–162. processes of black band disease in corals through integrated genomics.
Sci. Rep. 7: 40455.
Miner, C.M., Burnaford, J.L., Ambrose, R.F. et al. (2018) Large-scale
impacts of sea star wasting disease (SSWD) on intertidal sea stars and Shapiro, O.H., Kramarsky-Winter, E., Gavish, A.R. et al. (2016) A coral-
implications for recovery. PLoS One 13: e0192870. on-a-chip microfluidic platform enabling live-imaging microscopy of
reef-building corals. Nat. Commun. 7: 10860.
Sharp, W. & Maxwell, K. (2018) Investigating the ongoing coral disease
outbreak in the florida keys: collecting corals to diagnose the etiological
agent(s) and establishing sentinel sites to monitor transmission rates and
References 51

the spatial progression of the disease. Report, Florida Fish & Wildlife Weynberg, K.D. (2018) Ecosystems: from open waters to coral reefs.
Research Institute. Online at https://floridadep.gov/sites/default/files/FW In: Malmstrom, C. (ed), Environmental Virology and Virus Ecology.
C-Sentinel-Site-Report-Final.pdf (accessed 4 July 2019). Academic Press, pp. 2–38.
Soffer, N., Brandt, M.E., Correa, A.M. et al. (2014) Potential role of Wilson, B., Muirhead, A., Bazanella, M. et al. (2013) An improved detec­
viruses in white plague coral disease. ISME J. 8: 271–283. tion and quantification method for the coral pathogen Vibrio coralliilyti­
cus. PLoS One 8: e81800.
Soler-Hurtado, M.M., Sandoval-Sierra, J.V., Machordom, A., & Diéguez-
Uribeondo, J. (2016) Aspergillus sydowii and other potential fungal Wilson, W.H. (2011) Coral viruses. In: Hurst, C.J. (ed), Studies in Viral
pathogens in gorgonian octocorals of the Ecuadorian Pacific. PLoS One Ecology: Animal Host Systems. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 143–151.
11: e0165992. Wood, E. (2018) Impacts of sunscreens on corals. Report by the
Stacy, B.A., Wellehan, J.F.X., Foley, A.M. et al. (2008) Two herpesviruses International Coral Reef Initiative (ICRI). https://crm.gov.mp/wp-con
associated with disease in wild Atlantic loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta tent/uploads/crm/ICRI_Sunscreen_0.pdf (accessed 4 March 2019).
caretta). Vet. Microbiol. 126: 63–73. Work, T. & Meteyer, C. (2014) To understand coral disease, look at coral
Sussman, M., Mieog, J.C., Doyle, J., et al. (2009) Vibrio zinc-metallopro­ cells. Ecohealth. 11: 610–618.
tease causes photoinactivation of coral endosymbionts and coral tissue Work, T.M., Richardson, L.L., Reynolds, T.L., & Willis, B.L. (2008)
lesions. PLoS One 4: e4511. Biomedical and veterinary science can increase our understanding of
Sussman, M., Willis, B.L., Victor, S., & Bourne, D.G. (2008) Coral patho­ coral disease. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 362: 63–70.
gens identified for White Syndrome (WS) epizootics in the Indo-Pacific. Arzul, I., Corbeil, S., Morga, B., & Renault, T. (2017) Viruses infecting
PLoS One 3: e2393. marine molluscs. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 147: 118–135.
Sutherland, K.P., Berry, B., Park, A. et al. (2016) Shifting white pox aeti­ Bruto, M., Labreuche, Y., James, A. et al. (2018) Ancestral gene acquisi­
ologies affecting Acropora palmata in the Florida Keys. Phil. Trans. R. tion as the key to virulence potential in environmental Vibrio popula­
Soc. B 371: 20150205. tions. ISME J. 12: 2954–2966.
Sutherland, K.P., Shaban, S., Joyner, J.L. et al. (2011) Human pathogen de Lorgeril, J., Escoubas, J.-M., Loubiere, V. et al. (2018) Inefficient
shown to cause disease in the threatened eklhorn coral Acropora pal­ immune response is associated with microbial permissiveness in juvenile
mata. PLoS One 6: e23468. oysters affected by mass mortalities on field. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 77:
Sweet, M. & Bythell, J. (2012) Ciliate and bacterial communities asso­ 156–163.
ciated with White Syndrome and Brown Band Disease in reef-building Genard, B., Miner, P., Nicolas, J.-L. et al. (2013) Integrative study of
corals. Environ. Microbiol. 14: 2184–2199. physiological changes associated with bacterial infection in Pacific oyster
Sweet, M. & Bythell, J. (2017) The role of viruses in coral health and larvae. PLoS One 8: e64534.
disease. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 147: 136–144. Maloy, A.P., Ford, S.E., Karney, R.C., & Boettcher, K.J. (2007)
Sweet, M., Bulling, M., & Cerrano, C. (2015) A novel sponge disease Roseovarius crassostreae, the etiological agent of Juvenile Oyster
caused by a consortium of micro-organisms. Coral Reefs 34: 871–883. Disease (now to be known as Roseovarius Oyster Disease) in Crassostrea
virginica. Aquaculture 269: 71–83.
Sweet, M.J. & Bulling, M.T. (2017) On the importance of the microbiome
and pathobiome in coral health and disease. Front. Mar. Sci. 4: 9. Meyer, G.R., Lowe, G.J., Gilmore, S.R., & Bower, S.M. (2017) Disease
and mortality among Yesso scallops Patinopecten yessoensis putatively
Sweet, M.J., Jones, R., & Bythell, J.C. (2011) Coral diseases in aquaria
caused by infection with Francisella halioticida. Dis. Aquat. Organ.
and in nature. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 92: 791–801.
125:79–84.
Thurber, R.V., Payet, J.P., Thurber, A.R., & Correa, A.M.S. (2017) Virus–
Mills, A.M., Ward, M.E., Heyl, T.P., & Van Dover, C.L. (2005) Parasitism
host interactions and their roles in coral reef health and disease. Nat. Rev.
as a potential contributor to massive clam mortality at the Blake Ridge
Microbiol. 15: 205–216.
Diapir methane-hydrate seep. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom 85:
Tout, J., Siboni, N., Messer, L.F. et al. (2015) Increased seawater tempera­ 1489–1497.
ture increases the abundance and alters the structure of natural Vibrio
Romalde, J.L., Dieguez, A.L., Lasa, A., & Balboa, S. (2014) New Vibrio
populations associated with the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Front.
species associated to molluscan microbiota: a review. Front. Microbiol.
Microbiol. 6: 432.
4: 413.
Ushijima, B., Videau, P., Burger, A.H. et al. (2014) Vibrio coralliilyti­
Ward, M.E., Van Dover, C.L., & Shields, J.D. (2004) Parasitism in species
cus strain OCN008 is an etiological agent of acute Montipora white syn­
of Bathymodiolus (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) mussels from deep-sea seep and
drome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80: 2102–2109.
hydrothermal vents. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 62: 1–16.
van de Water, J.A.J.M., Allemand, D., & Ferrier-Pagès, C. (2018) Host-
Zielinski, F.U., Pernthaler, A., Duperron, S. et al. (2009) Widespread
microbe interactions in octocoral holobionts - recent advances and per­
occurrence of an intranuclear bacterial parasite in vent and seep bathy­
spectives. Microbiome 6: 64.
modiolin mussels. Environ. Microbiol. 11: 1150–1167.
Walton, C., Hayes, N.K., & Gilliam, D.S. (2018) Impacts of a regional,
Bateman, K.S. & Stentiford, G.D. (2017) A taxonomic review of viruses
multi-year, multi-species coral disease outbreak in Southeast Florida.
infecting crustaceans with an emphasis on wild hosts. J. Invertebr.
Front. Mar. Sci. 5: 323.
Pathol. 147: 86–110.
Ward, J.R. & Lafferty, K.D. (2004) The elusive baseline of marine dis­
Cano-Gõmez, A., Goulden, E.F., Owens, L., & Høj, L. (2010) Vibrio
ease: are diseases in ocean ecosystems increasing? PLoS Biol. 2: e120.
owensii sp. nov., isolated from cultured crustaceans in Australia. FEMS
Webster, N.S. Sponge disease: a global threat? Environ. Microbiol. 9: Microbiol. Lett. 302: 175–181.
1363–1375.
Drake, L.A. & Dobbs, F.C. (2005) Do viruses affect fecundity and sur­
Wegley Kelly, L., Haas, A.F., & Nelson, C.E. (2018) Ecosystem microbi­ vival of the copepod Acartia tonsa Dana? J. Plankton Res. 27: 167–174.
ology of coral reefs: linking genomic, metabolomic, and biogeochemical
Dunlap, D.S., Ng, T.F.F., Rosario, K. et al. (2013) Molecular and micro­
dynamics from animal symbioses to reefscape processes. mSystems 3:
scopic evidence of viruses in marine copepods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.
e00162-17.
S. A. 110: 1375–1380.
52 References

Elliott, D. & Tang, K. (2011) Influence of carcass abundance on estimates Pallen, M.J. & Wren, B.W. (2007) Bacterial pathogenomics. Nature 449:
of mortality and assessment of population dynamics in Acartia tonsa. 835–842.
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 427: 1–12. Reith, M.E., Singh, R.K., Curtis, B. et al. (2008) The genome of
Flegel, T.W. (2009) Current status of viral diseases in Asian shrimp aqua­ Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida A449: insights into the evo­
culture. Isr. J. Aquac. 61: 229–239. lution of a fish pathogen. BMC Genomics 9: 427.
Flegel, T.W. (2019) A future vision for disease control in shrimp aquacul­ Rønneseth, A., Castillo, D., D’Alvise, P. et al. (2017) Comparative assess­
ture. J. World Aquac. Soc. doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12589 ment of Vibrio virulence in marine fish larvae. J. Fish Dis. 40: 1373–1385.
Flegel, T.W., Pasharawipas, T., Owens, L., & Oakey, H.J. (2005) Evidence Vanden Bergh, P. & Frey, J. (2013) Aeromonas salmonicida subsp.
for phage-induced virulence in the shrimp pathogen Vibrio harveyi. 329– salmonicida in the light of its type-three secretion system. Microb.
338. Dis. Asian Aqiuac. V: 329–327. Biotechnol. 7: 381–400.
Kawato, S., Shitara, A., Wang, Y. et al. (2018) Crustacean genome explo­ Vincent, A.T., Trudel, M.V., Freschi, L. et al. (2016) Increasing genomic
ration reveals the evolutionary origin of white spot syndrome virus. J. diversity and evidence of constrained lifestyle evolution due to insertion
Virol. 93: e01144-18. sequences in Aeromonas salmonicida. BMC Genomics 17: 44.
Labreuche, Y., Chenivesse, S., Jeudy, A. et al. (2017) Nigritoxin is a bacte­ Wallace, I.S., McKay, P., & Murray, A.G. (2017) A historical review of
rial toxin for crustaceans and insects. Nat. Commun. 8: 1248. the key bacterial and viral pathogens of Scottish wild fish. J. Fish Dis.
40: 1741–1756.
Munro, J., Oakey, J., Bromage, E., & Owens, L. (2003) Experimental bac­
teriophage-mediated virulence in strains of Vibrio harveyi. Dis. Aquat. Ward, T., Hoedt, F., McLeay, L. et al. (2001) Effects of the 1995 and 1998
Organ. 54: 187–194. mass mortality events on the spawning biomass of sardine, Sardinops
sagax, in South Australian waters. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 58: 865–875.
Oakey, H.J., Cullen, B.R., & Owens, L. (2002) The complete nucleotide
sequence of the Vibrio harveyi bacteriophage VHML. J. Appl. Microbiol. Whittington, R.J., Crockford, M., Jordan, D., & Jones, B. (2008)
93: 1089–1098. Herpesvirus that caused epizootic mortality in 1995 and 1998 in pil­
chard, Sardinops sagax neopilchardus (Steindachner), in Australia is now
Wang, W. (2011) Bacterial diseases of crabs: a review. J. Invertebr.
endemic. J. Fish Dis. 31: 97–105.
Pathol. 106: 18–26.
Bennett, P.M., Jepson, P.D., Law, R.J. et al. (2001) Exposure to heavy met­
Austin, B. & Newaj-Fyzul, A. eds. (2017) Diagnosis and Control of
als and infectious disease mortality in harbour porpoises from England
Diseases of Fish and Shellfish. John Wiley & Sons.
and Wales. Environ. Pollut. 112: 33–40.
Austin, B., Pride, A.C., & Rhodie, G.A. (2003) Association of a bacterio­
Doucette, G.J., Cembella, A.D., Martin, J.L. et al. (2006) Paralytic shell­
phage with virulence in Vibrio harveyi. J. Fish Dis. 26: 55–58.
fish poisoning (PSP) toxins in North Atlantic right whales Eubalaena
Austin, B. & Zhang, X.-H. (2006) Vibrio harveyi: a significant patho­ glacialis and their zooplankton prey in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Mar.
gen of marine vertebrates and invertebrates. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 43: Ecol. Prog. Ser. 306: 303–313.
119–124.
Doucette, G.J., Medlin, L.K., McCarron, P., & Hess, P. (2018) Detection
Beaz-Hidalgo, R. & Figueras, M.J. (2013) Aeromonas spp. whole genomes and Surveillance of Harmful Algal Bloom Species and Toxins. In:
and virulence factors implicated in fish disease. J. Fish Dis. 36: 371–388. Harmful Algal Blooms. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp.
Cárdenas, C., Ojeda, N., Labra, Á., & Marshall, S.H. (2019) Molecular 39–114.
features associated with the adaptive evolution of Infectious Salmon Gulland, F.M.D., Dierauf, L.A., & Whitman, K.L. (2018) CRC Handbook
Anemia Virus (ISAV) in Chile. Infect. Genet. Evol. 68: 203–211. of Marine Mammal Medicine, 3rd edition. CRC Press.
Dallaire-Dufresne, S., Tanaka, K.H., Trudel, M.V. et al. (2014) Virulence, Gulland, F.M.D. & Hall, A.J. (2007) Is marine mammal health deteri­
genomic features, and plasticity of Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. sal­ orating? Trends in the global reporting of marine mammal disease. 4:
monicida, the causative agent of fish furunculosis. Vet. Microbiol. 169: 135–150.
1–7.
Häussermann, V., Gutstein, C.S., Beddington, M., Cassis, D., Olavarria,
Escobar, L.E., Escobar-Dodero, J., & Phelps, N.B.D. (2018) Infectious C., Dale, A.C. et al. (2017) Largest baleen whale mass mortality during
disease in fish: global risk of viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus. Rev. strong El Niño event is likely related to harmful toxic algal bloom. PeerJ
Fish Biol. Fish. 28: 637–655. 5: e3123.
Guanhua, Y., Wang, C., Wang, X. et al. (2018) Complete genome Jepson, P.D., Bennett, P.M., Allchin, C.R. et al. (1999) Investigating poten­
sequence of the marine fish pathogen Vibrio anguillarum and genome- tial associations between chronic exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls
wide transposon mutagenesis analysis of genes essential for in vivo infec­ and infectious disease mortality in harbour porpoises from England and
tion. Microbiol. Res. 216: 97–107. Wales. Sci. Total Environ. 244: 339–348.
Hjerde, E., Lorentzen, M.S., Holden, M.T.G. et al. (2008) The genome Jepson, P.D., Deaville, R., Barber, J.L. et al. (2015) PCB pollution contin­
sequence of the fish pathogen Aliivibrio salmonicida strain LFI1238 ues to impact populations of orcas and other dolphins in European waters.
shows extensive evidence of gene decay. 9:616. Sci. Rep. 6: 18573.
Ina-Salwany, M.Y., Al-Saari, N., Mohamad, A. et al. (2019) Vibriosis in Jo, W.K., Osterhaus, A.D., & Ludlow, M. (2018) Transmission of morbil­
fish: a review on disease development and prevention. J. Aquat. Anim. liviruses within and among marine mammal species. Curr. Opin. Virol.
Health. 31: 3–22 . 28: 133–141.
Kalatzis, P., Castillo, D., Katharios, P. et al. (2018) Bacteriophage inter­ Lefebvre, K.A., Bargu, S., Kieckhefer, T., & Silver, M.W. (2002) From
actions with marine pathogenic vibrios: implications for phage therapy. sanddabs to blue whales: the pervasiveness of domoic acid. Toxicon 40:
Antibiotics 7: 15. 971–977.
Kashulin, A., Seredkina, N., & Sørum, H. (2017) Cold-water vibriosis. Nymo, I.H., Tryland, M., & Godfroid, J. (2011) A review of Brucella
The current status of knowledge. J. Fish Dis. 40: 119–126. infection in marine mammals, with special emphasis on Brucella pinni­
Krkošek, M. (2017) Population biology of infectious diseases shared by pedialis in the hooded seal (Cystophora cristata). Vet. Res. 42: 93.
wild and farmed fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 74: 620–628.
References 53

Pyenson, N.D., Gutstein, C.S., Parham, J.F. et al. (2014) Repeated Baracchini, T., King, A.A., Bouma, M.J. et al. (2017) Seasonality in chol­
mass strandings of Miocene marine mammals from Atacama Region era dynamics: A rainfall-driven model explains the wide range of patterns
of Chile point to sudden death at sea. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281: in endemic areas. Adv. Water Resour. 108: 357–366.
20133316–20133316. Borgeaud, S., Metzger, L.C., Scrignari, T., & Blokesch, M. (2015) The
Rolland, R.M., Hamilton, P.K., Kraus, S.D. et al. (2007) Faecal sampling type VI secretion system of Vibrio cholerae fosters horizontal gene trans­
using detection dogs to study reproduction and health in North Atlantic fer. Science 347: 63–67.
right whales (Euhalaena glacialis). J. Cetac. Res. Man. 8: 121–125. Chourashi, R., Das, S., Dhar, D. et al. (2018) Chitin-induced T6SS in
Ross, P.S. (2002) The role of immunotoxic environmental contaminants Vibrio cholerae is dependent on ChiS activation. Microbiology 164:
in facilitating the emergence of infectious diseases in marine mammals. 751–763.
Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 8: 277–292. Church, S.R., Lux, T., Baker-Austin, C. et al. (2016) Vibrio vulnificus
Ross, P.S., De Swart, R.L., Timmerman, H.H. et al. (1996) Suppression of type 6 secretion system 1 contains anti-bacterial properties. PLoS One
natural killer cell activity in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) fed Baltic Sea 11: e0165500.
herring. Aquat. Toxicol. 34: 71–84. Cianfanelli, F.R., Monlezun, L., & Coulthurst, S.J. (2016) Aim, load,
Scholin, C.A., Gulland, F., Doucette, G.J. et al. (2000) Mortality of sea fire: The type VI secretion system, a bacterial nanoweapon. Trends
lions along the central California coast linked to a toxic diatom bloom. Microbiol.24: 51–62.
Nature 403: 80–84. Colwell, R.R., Huq, A., Islam, M.S. et al. (2003) Reduction of cholera
Smith, J., Connell, P., Evans, R.H. et al. (2018) A decade and a half of in Bangladeshi villages by simple filtration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100:
Pseudo-nitzschia spp. and domoic acid along the coast of southern 1051–1055.
California. Harmful Algae 79: 87–104. Durai, S., Pandian, S.K., & Balamurugan, K. (2011) Changes in
Whatmore, A.M., Dawson, C., Muchowski, J. et al. (2017) Characterisation Caenorhabditis elegans exposed to Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J.
of North American Brucella isolates from marine mammals. PLoS One Microbiol. Biotechnol. 21: 1026–1035.
12: e0184758. Ellison, C.K., Dalia, T.N., Ceballos, A.V. et al. (2018) Retraction of DNA-
Chaloupka, M., Balazs, G.H., & Work, T.M. (2009) Rise and fall over 26 bound type IV competence pili initiates DNA uptake during natural
years of a marine epizootic in Hawaiian green sea turtles. J. Wildl. Dis. transformation in Vibrio cholerae. Nat. Microbiol. 3: 773–780.
45: 1138–1142. Faruque, S.M. & Mekanolos, J.M. (2012) Phage-bacterial interactions in
Greenblatt, R.J., Work, T.M., Balazs, G.H. et al. (2004) The Ozobranchus the evolution of Vibrio cholerae. Virulence 3: 556–565.
leech is a candidate mechanical vector for the fibropapilloma-associated Ghenem, L., Elhadi, N., Alzahrani, F., & Nishibuchi, M. (2017) Vibrio
turtle herpesvirus found latently infecting skin tumors on Hawaiian green parahaemolyticus: A review on distribution, pathogenesis, virulence
turtles (Chelonia mydas). Virology 321: 101–110. determinants and epidemiology. Saudi J. Med. Med. Sci.93: 93–103.
Greenblatt, R.J., Work, T.M., Dutton, P. et al. (2005) Geographic varia­ Hartnell, R.E., Stockley, L., Keay, W. et al. (2019) A pan-European ring
tion in marine turtle fibropapillomatosis. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 36: 527–530. trial to validate an International Standard for detection of Vibrio chol­
Hughes, R.G., Potouroglou, M., Ziauddin, Z., & Nicholls, J.C. (2018) erae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in seafoods. Int. J.
Seagrass wasting disease: nitrate enrichment and exposure to a herbicide Food Microbiol. 288: 58–65.
(Diuron) increases susceptibility of Zostera marina to infection. Mar. Heng, S.-P., Letchumanan, V., Deng, C.-Y. et al. (2017) Vibrio vulnificus:
Poll. Bull. 134: 94–98. An environmental and clinical burden. Front. Microbiol. 8: 997.
Lachnit, T., Thomas, T., & Steinberg, P. (2016) Expanding our under­ Hsueh, P.-R., Lin, C.-Y., Tang, H.-J. et al. (2004) Vibrio vulnificus in
standing of the seaweed holobiont: RNA viruses of the red alga Delisea Taiwan. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10: 1363–1368.
pulchra. Front. Microbiol. 6: 1489.
Huq, A., Yunus, M., Sohel, S.S. et al. (2010) Simple sari cloth filtration
McKeown, D., Schroeder, J., Stevens, K. et al. (2018) Phaeoviral infec­ of water is sustainable and continues to protect villagers from cholera in
tions are present in Macrocystis, Ecklonia and Undaria (Laminariales) Matlab, Bangladesh. MBio 1: e00034-10.
and are influenced by wave exposure in Ectocarpales. Viruses 10: 410.
IPCC (2018) Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5°C above pre-indus­
Qiu, Z., Coleman, M.A., Provost, E. et al. (2019) Future climate change is trial levels. www.ipcc.ch/sr15/. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.
predicted to affect the microbiome and condition of habitat-forming kelp.
Proc. Roy. Soc. B 286: 20181887. Le Roux, F. & Blokesch, M. (2018) Eco-evolutionary dynamics linked
to horizontal gene transfer in vibrios. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 72: 89–110.
Sullivan, B.K., Trevathan-Tackett, S.M., Neuhauser, S., & Govers, L.L.
(2018) Host-pathogen dynamics of seagrass diseases under future global Lekshmi, N., Joseph, I., Ramamurthy, T., & Thomas, S. (2018) Changing
change. Mar. Poll. Bull. 134: 75–88. facades of Vibrio cholerae: An enigma in the epidemiology of cholera.
Indian J. Med. Res. 147: 133–141.
Zozaya-Vald, E., Roth-Schulze, A.J., Egan, S., & Thomas, T. (2017)
Microbial community function in the bleaching disease of the marine Lipp, E.K., Huq, A., & Colwell, R.R. (2002) Effects of global climate on
macroalgae Delisea pulchra. Environ. Microbiol. 19: 3012–3024. infectious disease: The cholera model. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15: 757–770.
Almagro-Moreno, S. & Taylor, R.K. (2013) Cholera: Environmental res­ Nelson, E.J., Harris, J.B. Morrisa Jr, J.G. et al. (2009) Cholera transmis­
ervoirs and impact on disease transmission. Microbiol. Spectrum 1: 1–19. sion: The host, pathogen and bacteriophage dynamic. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.
7: 693–702.
Baker-Austin, C. & Oliver, J.D. (2018) Vibrio vulnificus: New insights
into a deadly opportunistic pathogen. Environ. Microbiol. 20: 423–430. Okada, K., Iida, T., Kita-Tsukamoto, K., & Honda, T. (2005) Vibrios
commonly possess two chromosomes. J. Bacteriol. 187: 752–757.
Baker-Austin, C., Trinanes, J., Gonzalez-Escalona, N., & Martinez-
Urtaza, J. (2017) Non-cholera vibrios: The microbial barometer of climate Phillips, K.E. & Satchell, K.J.F. (2017) Vibrio vulnificus: From oyster
change. Trends Microbiol. 25: 76–84. colonist to human pathogen. PLOS Pathog. 13: e1006053.
Baker-Austin, C., Trinanes, J.A., Taylor, N.G.H. et al. (2012) Emerging Roig, F.J., González-Candelas, F., Sanjuán, E. et al. (2018) Phylogeny of
Vibrio risk at high latitudes in response to ocean warming. Nat. Clim. Vibrio vulnificus from the analysis of the core-genome: Implications for
Change 3: 73–77. intra-species taxonomy. Front. Microbiol. 8: 2613.
54 References

Sakib, S.N., Reddi, G., & Almagro-Moreno, S. (2018) Environmental role Ottesen, E.A. (2016) Probing the living ocean with ecogenomic sensors.
of pathogenic traits in Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 200: e00795-17. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 31: 132–139.
Semenza, J.C., Trinanes, J., Lohr, W. et al. (2017) Environmental suitabil­ Bixler, G.D. & Bhushan, B. (2012) Biofouling: Lessons from nature.
ity of Vibrio infections in a warming climate: An early warning system. Trans. R. Soc. A 370: 2381–2417.
Environ. Health Perspect. 125: 107004. Charles, F., Sauriau, P.-G., Aubert, F., et al. (2018) Sources partitioning
Shapiro, B.J., Levade, I., Kovacikova, G. et al. (2016) Origins of pan­ in the diet of the shipworm Bankia carinata (J.E. Gray, 1827): An experi­
demic Vibrio cholerae from environmental gene pools. Nat. Microbiol. mental study based on stable isotopes. Mar. Environ. Res. 142: 208–213.
2: 16240. de Carvalho, C.C.C.R. (2018) Marine biofilms: A successful microbial
Vezzulli, L., Brettar, I., Pezzati, E. et al. (2012) Long-term effects of strategy with economic implications. Front. Mar. Sci. 5: 126.
ocean warming on the prokaryotic community: Evidence from the vib­ Enning, D. & Garrelfs, J. (2014) Corrosion of iron by sulfate-reducing
rios. ISME J. 6: 21–30. bacteria: New views of an old problem. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80:
Vezzulli, L., Grande, C., Reid, P.C. et al. (2016) Climate influence on 1226–1236.
Vibrio and associated human diseases during the past half-century in the Jia, R., Unsal, T., Xu, D., et al. (2019) Microbiologically influenced cor­
coastal North Atlantic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113: E5062–71. rosion and current mitigation strategies: A state of the art review. Int.
Wagley, S., Borne, R., Harrison, J. et al. (2018) Galleria mellonella as Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 137: 42–58.
an infection model to investigate virulence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Kip, N. & Van Veen, J.A. (2015) The dual role of microbes in corrosion.
Virulence 9: 197–207. ISME J. 9: 542–551.
WHO (2017) Cholera vaccines: WHO position paper – August 2017. Little, B.J., Lee, J.S., & Ray, R.I. (2008) The influence of marine biofilms
Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 92: 477–500. on corrosion: A concise review. Electrochim. Acta 54: 2–7.
Gauthier, D.T. (2014) Bacterial zoonoses of fishes: A review and appraisal Martín-Rodríguez, A.J., Babarro, J.M.F., Lahoz, F., et al. (2015) From
of evidence for linkages between fish and human infections. Vet. Rec. broad-spectrum biocides to quorum sensing disruptors and mussel repel­
203: 27–35. lents: Antifouling profile of alkyl triphenylphosphonium salts. PLoS One
Haenen, O.L., Evans, J.J., & Berthe, F. (2013) Bacterial infections from 10: e0123652.
aquatic species: Potential for and prevention of contact zoonoses. Rev. O’Connor, R.M., Fung, J.M., et al. (2014) Gill bacteria enable a novel
Sci.Tech. (Int. Off. Epizoot.) 32: 497–507. digestive strategy in a wood-feeding mollusk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
Hunt, T.D., Ziccardi, M.H., Gulland, F.M. et al. (2008) Health risks for 111: E5096–104.
marine mammal workers. Dis. Aquat. Org. 81: 81–92. Pal, S., Qureshi, A., & Purohit, H.J. (2018) Intercepting signalling mecha­
Waltzek, T.B., Cortés‐Hinojosa, G., Wellehan Jr, J.F.X., & Gray, G.C. nism to control environmental biofouling. 3Biotech 8: 364.
(2012) Marine mammal zoonoses: A review of disease manifestations. Pandit, S., Sarode, S., Sargunaraj, F., & Chandrasekhar, K. (2018)
Zoonoses Pub. Health 59: 521–535. Bacterial-mediated biofouling: Fundamentals and control techniques. In:
Assunção, J., Guedes, A.C., & Malcata, F.X. (2017) Biotechnological and Biotechnological Applications of Quorum Sensing Inhibitors. Springer
pharmacological applications of biotoxins and other bioactive molecules Singapore, Singapore, pp. 263–284.
from dinoflagellates. Mar. Drugs 15:.393. Sandström, M., Jalilehvand, F., Persson, I., et al. (2002) Deterioration of
Dorantes-Aranda, J.J., Campbell, K., Bradbury, A. et al. (2017) the seventeenth-century warship Vasa by internal formation of sulphuric
Comparative performance of four immunological test kits for the detec­ acid. Nature 415: 893.
tion of Paralytic Shellfish Toxins in Tasmanian shellfish. Toxicon 125: Vigneron, A., Alsop, E.B., Chambers, B., et al. (2016) Complementary
110–119. microorganisms in highly corrosive biofilms from an offshore oil produc­
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain, Knutsen, H.K., tion facility. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82: 2545–2554.
Alexander, J., Barregard, L. et al. (2017) Risks for public health related Vigneron, A., Head, I.M., & Tsesmetzis, N. (2018) Damage to offshore
to the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX) and TTX analogues in marine production facilities by corrosive microbial biofilms. Appl. Microbiol.
bivalves and gastropods. EFSA J. 15: e4752. Biotechnol. 102: 2525–2533.
Feng, C., Teuber, S., & Gershwin, M.E. (2016) Histamine (scombroid) Yang, J.C., Madupu, R., Durkin, A.S., et al. (2009) The complete genome
fish poisoning: A comprehensive review. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 50: of Teredinibacter turnerae T7901: An intracellular endosymbiont of
64–69. marine wood-boring bivalves (shipworms). PLoS One 4: e6085.
Jal, S. & Khora, S.S. (2015) An overview on the origin and production Amos, G.C.A., Hawkey, P.M., Gaze, W.H., & Wellington, E.M. (2014)
of tetrodotoxin, a potent neurotoxin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 119: 907–916. Waste water effluent contributes to the dissemination of CTX-M-15 in the
Magarlamov, T.Y., Melnikova, D.I., & Chernyshev, A.V. (2017) natural environment. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 69: 1785–1791.
Tetrodotoxin-producing bacteria: Detection, distribution and migration Arnold, B.F., Schiff, K.C., Ercumen, A., et al. (2017) Acute illness among
of the toxin in aquatic systems. Toxins 9: 166. surfers after exposure to seawater in dry- and wet-weather conditions.
McLauchlin, J., Little, C.L., Grant, K.A., & Mithani, V. (2006) Am. J. Epidemiol. 186: 866–875.
Scombrotoxic fish poisoning. J. Pub. Health 28: 61–62. Arnold, B.F., Wade, T.J., Benjamin-Chung, J., et al. (2016) Acute gastro­
Rongo, T., Bush, M., & van Woesik, R. (2009) Did ciguatera prompt enteritis and recreational water: Highest burden among young US chil­
the late Holocene Polynesian voyages of discovery? J. Biogeogr. 36: dren. Am. J. Public Health 106: 1690–1697.
1423–1432. Balique, F., Lecoq, H., Raoult, D., et al. (2015) Can plant viruses cross
Gilbert, P.M., Berdalet, E., Burford, M.A. et al. (2018) Global Ecology the kingdom border and be pathogenic to humans? Viruses 7; 2074–2098.
and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms. Springer Nature. Boehm, A.B., Graham, K.E., & Jennings, W.C. (2018) Can we swim yet?
McPartlin, D.A., Loftus, J.H., Crawley, A.S., Silke, J. et al. (2017) Systematic review, meta-analysis, and risk assessment of aging sewage in
Biosensors for the monitoring of harmful algal blooms. Curr. Opin. surface waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52: 9634–9645.
Biotechnol. 45: 164–169.
References 55

Bradley, G., & Hancock, C. (2003) Increased risk of non-seasonal and Rosario, K., Symonds, E.M., Sinigalliano, C., et al. (2009) Pepper mild
body immersion recreational marine bathers contacting indicator micro­ mottle virus as an indicator of fecal pollution. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
organisms of sewage pollution. Mar. Poll. Bull. 46: 791–794. 75: 7261–7267.
Cabelli, V.J., Dufour, A.P., McCabe, L.J., & Levin, M.A. (1982) Stachler, E., Kelty, C., Sivaganesan, M., et al. (2017) Quantitative
Swimming-associated gastroenteritis and water quality. Am. J. Epidemiol. CrAssphage PCR assays for human fecal pollution measurement.
115: 606–616. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51: 9146–9154.
Colson, P., Richet, H., Desnues, C., et al. (2010) Pepper mild mottle virus, Stone, D.L., Harding, A.K., Hope, B.K., & Slaughter-Mason, S. (2008)
a plant virus associated with specific immune responses, fever, abdomi­ Exposure assessment and risk of gastrointestinal illness among surfers. J.
nal pains, and pruritus in humans. PLoS One 5: e10041. Toxicol. Environ. Heal. A-Curr. Issues 71: 1603–1615.
Dutilh, B.E., Cassman, N., McNair, K., et al. (2014) A highly abundant Symonds, E.M., Nguyen, K.H., Harwood, V.J., & Breitbart, M. (2018)
bacteriophage discovered in the unknown sequences of human faecal Pepper mild mottle virus: A plant pathogen with a greater purpose in
metagenomes. Nat. Commun. 5: 4498. (waste)water treatment development and public health management.
Water Res. 144: 1–12.
Fewtrell, L. & Kay, D. (2015) Recreational water and infection: A review
of recent findings. Curr. Environ. Heal. Rep. 2: 85–94. USEPA Office of Science & Technology (2015) Review of coliphages
as possible indicators of fecal contamination for ambient water quality.
Fleisher, J.M., Kay, D., Wyer, M.D., & Godfree, A.F. (1998) Estimates
Available online: www.epa.gov/wqc/review-coliphages-possible-indicat
of the severity of illnesses associated with bathing in marine recre­
ors-fecal-contamination-ambient-water-quality (accessed 2 Feb 2019).
ational waters contaminated with domestic sewage. Int. J. Epidemiol. 27:
722–726. Wade, T.J., Pai, N., Eisenberg, J.N.S., & Colford Jr, J.M. (2003) Do US
Environmental Protection Agency water quality guidelines for recre­
Haramoto, E., Kitajima, M., Hata, A.,et al. (2018) A review on recent
ational waters prevent gastrointestinal illness? A systematic review and
progress in the detection methods and prevalence of human enteric
meta-analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 111: 1102–.1109.
viruses in water. Water Res. 135: 168–186.
Wang, H., Sikora, P., Rutgersson, C., et al. (2018) Differential removal of
Hassard, F., Gwyther, C.L., Farkas, K., et al. (2016) Abundance and dis­
human pathogenic viruses from sewage by conventional and ozone treat­
tribution of enteric bacteria and viruses in coastal and estuarine sedi­
ments. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 221: 479–488.
ments—A review. Front. Microbiol. 7: 1692.
Williams, A.P., Avery, L.M., Killham, K., & Jones, D.L. (2007)
Heaney, C.D., Sams, E., Wing, S., et al. (2009) Contact with beach sand
Persistence, dissipation, and activity of Escherichia coli O157: H7 within
among beachgoers and risk of illness. Am. J. Epidemiol. 170: 164–172.
sand and seawater environments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 60: 24–32.
Jofre, J. & Blanch, A.R. (2010) Feasibility of methods based on nucleic
Bellou, M., Kokkinos, P., & Vantarakis, A. (2013) Shellfish-borne viral
acid amplification techniques to fulfil the requirements for microbiologi­
outbreaks: A systematic review. Food Environ. Virol. 5: 13–23.
cal analysis of water quality. J. Appl. Microbiol. 109: 1853–1867.
Bintsis, T. (2018) Microbial pollution and food safety. AIMS Microbiol.
Kay, D., Wyer, M., Fewtrell, L., et al. (2001) Health effects from recre­
4: 377–396.
ational water contact.
Calci, K.R., Meade, G.K., Tezloff, R.C., & Kingsley, D.H. (2005) High-
Leonard, A.F.C., Singer, A., Ukoumunne, O.C., et al. (2018) Is it safe to
pressure inactivation of hepatitis A virus within oysters. Appl. Environ.
go back into the water? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the
Microbiol. 71: 339–343.
risk of acquiring infections from recreational exposure to seawater. Int. J.
Epidemiol. 47: 572–586. Gram, L. & Dalgaard, P. (2002) Fish spoilage bacteria - problems and
solutions. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13: 262–266.
Leonard, A.F.C., Zhang, L., Balfour, A.J., et al. (2018) Exposure to and
colonisation by antibiotic-resistant E. coli in UK coastal water users: Gyawali, P., Fletcher, G.C., McCoubrey, D.-J., & Hewitt, J. (2019)
Environmental surveillance, exposure assessment, and epidemiological Norovirus in shellfish: An overview of post-harvest treatments and their
study (Beach Bum Survey). Environ. Int. 114: 326–333. challenges. Food Control 99: 171–179.
Mendes Silva, D. & Domingues, L. (2015) On the track for an efficient Hassard, F., Sharp, J.H., Taft, H., et al. (2017) Critical review on the public
detection of Escherichia coli in water: A review on PCR-based methods. health impact of norovirus contamination in shellfish and the environ­
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 113: 400–411. ment: A UK perspective. Food Environ. Virol. 9: 123–141.
Muniesa, M., Jofre, J., Garcia-Aljaro, C., & Blanch, A.R. (2006) Imamura, S., Kanezashi, H., Goshima, T., et al. (2017) Effect of high-
Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157 : H7 and other enterohemorrhagic pressure processing on human noroviruses in laboratory-contaminated
Escherichia coli in the environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40: 7141–7149. oysters by bio-accumulation. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 14: 518–523.
O’Neill, J. (2016) Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: Final report Murchie, L.W., Cruz-Romero, M., Kerry, J.P., et al. (2005) High pressure
and recommendations. The review on antimicrobial resistance. Available processing of shellfish: A review of microbiological and other quality
online: https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160518_Final%20paper_ aspects. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 6: 257–270.
with%20cover.pdf (accessed 2 February 2019). Odeyemi, O.A., Burke, C.M., Bolch, C.C.J., & Stanley, R. (2018) Seafood
Oliver, D.M., Hanley, N.D., van Niekerk, M., et al. (2016) Molecular spoilage microbiota and associated volatile organic compounds at dif­
tools for bathing water assessment in Europe: Balancing social science ferent storage temperatures and packaging conditions. Int. J. Food
research with a rapidly developing environmental science evidence-base. Microbiol. 280: 87–99.
Ambio 45: 52–62. Olatunde, O.O. & Benjakul, S. (2018) Natural preservatives for extending
Pruss, A. (1998) Review of epidemiological studies on health effects from the shelf-life of seafood: A revisit. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 17:
exposure to recreational water. Int. J. Epidemiol. 27: 1–9. 1595–1612.
Quilliam, R.S., Taylor, J., & Oliver, D.M. (2019) The disparity between Pacquit, A., Lau, K.T., McLaughlin, H., et al.(2006) Development of a
regulatory measurements of E. coli in public bathing waters and the volatile amine sensor for the monitoring of fish spoilage. Talanta 69:
public expectation of bathing water quality. J. Environ. Manage. 232: 515–20.
868–874.
56 References

Potasman, I., Paz, A., & Odeh, M. (2002) Infectious outbreaks associ­ Transportation Research Board & National Research Council (2003) Oil
ated with bivalve shellfish consumption: A worldwide perspective. Clin. in the Sea III: Inputs, Fates, and Effects. The National Academies Press,
Infect. Dis. 35: 921–928. Washington, DC.
Tsironi, T.N. & Taoukis, P.S. (2018) Current practice and innovations in Ayangbenro, A.S. & Babalola, O.O. (2017) A new strategy for heavy
fish packaging. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 27: 1024–1047. metal polluted environments: A review of microbial biosorbents. Int. J.
Environ. Res. Public Health 14: 94.
Ventura De Souza, R., Campos, C., Hamilton, L., et al. (2017) A critical
analysis of the international legal framework regulating the microbiologi­ Chakraborty, J. & Das, S. (2016) Molecular perspectives and recent
cal classification of bivalve shellfish production areas. Rev. Aquacult. 10: advances in microbial remediation of persistent organic pollutants.
1025–1033. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23: 16883–16903.
Wells, N., Yusufu, D., & Mills, A. (2019) Colourimetric plastic film indi­ Chen, F., Li, Z.-L., & Wang, A.-J. (2019) Acceleration of microbial
cator for the detection of the volatile basic nitrogen compounds associated dehalorespiration with electrical stimulation. In Bioelectrochemistry
with fish spoilage. Talanta 194: 830–836. Stimulated Environmental Remediation. Springer Singapore, Singapore,
pp. 73–92.
Wu, L., Pu, H., & Sun, D.-W. (2019) Novel techniques for evaluating
freshness quality attributes of fish: A review of recent developments. Cheng, K.Y., Karthikeyan, R., & Wong, J.W.C. (2019) Microbial electro­
Trends Food Sci. Technol. 83: 259–273. chemical remediation of organic contaminants: Possibilities and perspec­
tive. In Microbial Electrochemical Technology, pp. 613–640, Elsevier.
Atlas, R. & Bragg, J. (2009) Bioremediation of marine oil spills: When
and when not—The Exxon Valdez experience. Microb. Biotechnol. 2: Harding, G., Dalziel, J., & Vass, P. (2018) Bioaccumulation of methyl­
213–221. mercury within the marine food web of the outer Bay of Fundy, Gulf of
Maine. PLoS One 13: e0197220.
Atlas, R.M. & Hazen, T.C. (2011) Oil biodegradation and bioremediation:
A tale of the two worst spills in U.S. history. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45: Matturro, B., Frascadore, E., & Rossetti, S. (2017) High-throughput
6709–6715. sequencing revealed novel Dehalococcoidia in dechlorinating micro­
bial enrichments from PCB-contaminated marine sediments. FEMS
Baelum, J., Borglin, S., Chakraborty, R., et al. (2012) Deep-sea bacte­
Microbiol. Ecol. 93: fix134.
ria enriched by oil and dispersant from the Deepwater Horizon spill.
Environ. Microbiol. 14: 2405–2416. Matturro, B., Ubaldi, C., & Rossetti, S. (2016) Microbiome dynamics of
a polychlorobiphenyl (PCB) historically contaminated marine sediment
Bik, H.M., Halanych, K.M., Sharma, J., & Thomas, W.K. (2012)
under conditions promoting reductive dechlorination. Front. Microbiol.
Dramatic shifts in benthic microbial eukaryote communities following
7: 1502.
the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. PLoS ONE 7: e38550.
Outridge, P.M., Mason, R.P., Wang, F., et al. (2018) Updated global
Delmont, T.O. & Eren, A.M. (2017) Simulations predict microbial
and oceanic mercury budgets for the United Nations Global Mercury
responses in the environment? This environment disagrees retrospec­
Assessment 2018. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52: 11466–11477.
tively. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114: E8947–E8949.
Qureshi, A.A., Bulich, A.A., & Isenberg, D.L. (2018) Microtox* toxicity
Hazen, T.C., Dubinsky, E.A., DeSantis, T.Z., et al. (2010) Deep-sea oil
test systems—Where they stand today. In Microscale Testing in Aquatic
plume enriches indigenous oil-degrading bacteria. Science 330: 204–208.
Toxicology, Wells, P.G. & Lee, K. (eds.), CRC Press, pp. 185–199.
Hazen, T.C., Prince, R.C., & Mahmoudi, N. (2016) Marine oil biodegra­
Regnell, O. & Watras, C.J. (2019) Microbial mercury methylation in
dation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50: 2121–2129.
aquatic environments: A critical review of published field and laboratory
Hu, P., Dubinsky, E.A., Probst, A.J., et al. (2017) Simulation of Deepwater studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53: 4–19.
Horizon oil plume reveals substrate specialization within a complex
Sanchez-Ferandin, S. (2015) Assessing ecotoxicity in marine environ­
community of hydrocarbon degraders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114:
ment using luminescent microalgae: Where are we at? Am. J. Plant Sci.
7432–7437.
6: 2502–2509.
Kimes, N.E., Callaghan, A.V., Suflita, J.M., & Morris, P.J. (2014)
Senn, D.B., Chesney, E.J., Blum, J.D., et al. (2010) Stable isotope (N, C,
Microbial transformation of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill—Past, pres­
Hg) study of methylmercury sources and trophic transfer in the northern
ent, and future perspectives. Front. Microbiol. 5: 603.
Gulf of Mexico. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44: 1630–1637.
King, G.M., Kostka, J.E., Hazen, T.C., & Sobecky, P.A. (2015) Microbial
Sunderland, E.M., Krabbenhoft, D.P., Moreau, J.W., et al. (2009) Mercury
responses to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: From coastal wetlands to
sources, distribution, and bioavailability in the North Pacific Ocean:
the deep sea. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 7: 377–401.
Insights from data and models. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 23: GB2010.
Kleindienst, S., Seidel, M., Ziervogel, K., et al. (2015) Chemical disper­
Wang, Y. & Tam, N.F.Y. (2019) Microbial remediation of organic pollut­
sants can suppress the activity of natural oil-degrading microorganisms.
ants. In World Seas an Environmental Evaluation, Sheppard, C. (ed.).
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112: 14900–5.
Acdemic Press, pp. 283–303.
Kleindienst, S., Seidel, M., Ziervogel, K., et al. (2016) Reply to Prince et
Zaferani, S., Pérez-Rodríguez, M., & Biester, H. (2018) Diatom ooze-A
al.: Ability of chemical dispersants to reduce oil spill impacts remains
large marine mercury sink. Science 361: 797–800.
unclear. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113: E1422–3.
Andrady, A.L. (2017) The plastic in microplastics: A review. Mar. Poll.
Prince, R.C., Coolbaugh, T.S., & Parkerton, T.F. (2016) Oil dispersants
Bull. 119: 12–22.
do facilitate biodegradation of spilled oil. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
113: E1421. Austin, H.P., Allen, M.D., Donohoe, B.S., et al. (2018) Characterization
and engineering of a plastic-degrading aromatic polyesterase. Proc. Natl.
Redmond, M.C. & Valentine, D.L. (2012) Natural gas and temperature
Acad. Sci. 115: E4350–E4357.
structured a microbial community response to the Deepwater Horizon oil
spill. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 20292–7. Bakir, A., O'Connor, I.A., Rowland, S.J., et al. (2016) Relative importance
of microplastics as a pathway for the transfer of hydrophobic organic
Ron, E.Z. & Rosenberg, E. (2014) Enhanced bioremediation of oil spills
chemicals to marine life. Environ. Pollut. 219: 56–65.
in the sea. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 27: 191–194.
Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Fileman, E., et al. (2013) Microplastic ingestion by
zooplankton. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47: 6646–6655.
References 57

Cole, M., Lindeque, P.K., Fileman, E., et al. (2016) microplastics alter the Wright, R.J., Gibson, M.I., & Christie-Oleza, J.A. (2019) Understanding
properties and sinking rates of zooplankton faecal pellets. Environ. Sci. microbial community dynamics to improve optimal microbiome selec­
Technol. 50: 3239–3246. tion. Microbiome 7: 85.
De Falco, F., Gullo, M.P., Gentile, G., et al. (2018) Evaluation of micro- Wright, S.L. & Kelly, F.J. (2017) Plastic and human health: A micro issue?
plastic release caused by textile washing processes of synthetic fabrics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51: 6634–6647.
Environ. Pollut. 236: 916–925. Yang, J., Yang, Y., Wu, W.-M., et al. (2014) Evidence of polyethylene
Galgani, L., Engel, A., Rossi, C., et al. (2018) Polystyrene microplastics biodegradation by bacterial strains from the guts of plastic-eating wax-
increase microbial release of marine chromophoric dissolved organic worms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48: 13776–13784.
matter in microcosm experiments. Sci. Rep. 8: 14635. Yang, Y., Yang, J., & Jiang, L. (2016) Comment on “A bacterium that
Gewert, B., Plassmann, M., Sandblom, O., & MacLeod, M. (2018) degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate)”. Science 353: 759.
Identification of chain scission products released to water by plastic Yang, Y., Yang, J., Wu, W.-M., et al. (2015) Biodegradation and miner­
exposed to ultraviolet light. Env. Sci. Technol. Lett. 5: 272–276. alization of polystyrene by plastic-eating mealworms: Part 2. role of gut
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J.R., & Law, K.L. (2017) Production, use, and fate of microorganisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49: 12087–12093.
all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 3: e1700782. Yoshida, S., Hiraga, K., Takehana, T., et al. (2016) A bacterium that
Gregory, M.R. (2009) Environmental implications of plastic debris in degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate). Science 351:
marine settings—Entanglement, ingestion, smothering, hangers-on, 1196–1199.
hitch-hiking and alien invasions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Zettler, E.R., Mincer, T.J., & Amaral-Zettler, L.A. (2013) Life in the
Sci. 364: 2013–25. “plastisphere”: Microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environ.
Harrison, J.P., Schratzberger, M., Sapp, M., & Osborn, A.M. (2014) Sci. Technol. 47: 7137–7146.
Rapid bacterial colonization of low-density polyethylene microplastics in Zobell, C.E. (1943) The effect of solid surfaces upon bacterial activity. J.
coastal sediment microcosms. BMC Microbiol. 14: 232. Bacteriol. 46: 39–56.
Hartmann, N.B., Hüffer, T., Thompson R.C., et al. (2019) Are we speak­ Beygmoradi, A. & Homaei, A. (2017) Marine microbes as a valu­
ing the same language? Recommendations for a definition and categoriza­ able resource for brand new industrial biocatalysts. Biocatal. Agric.
tion framework for plastic debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53: 1039–1047. Biotechnol. 11: 131–152.
Lobelle, D. & Cunliffe, M. (2011) Early microbial biofilm formation on Bonugli-Santos, R.C., dos Santos Vasconcelos, M.R., Passarini, M.R.Z.,
marine plastic debris. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62: 197–200. et al. (2015) Marine-derived fungi: Diversity of enzymes and biotechno­
Long, M., Moriceau, B., Gallinari, M., et al. (2015) Interactions between logical applications. Front. Microbiol. 6: 269.
microplastics and phytoplankton aggregates: Impact on their respective de Freitas, R.C., Marques, H.I.F., da Silva, M.A.C., et al. (2019) Evidence
fates. Mar. Chem. 175: 39–46. of selective pressure in whale fall microbiome proteins and its potential
Lusher, A.L., McHugh, M., & Thompson, R.C. 2013. Occurrence of application to industry. Mar. Genom. 45: 201–227.
microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of pelagic and demersal fish Goffredi, S.K., Johnson, S.B., & Vrijenhoek, R.C. (2007) Genetic
from the English Channel. Mar. Poll. Bull. 67: 94–99. diversity and potential function of microbial symbionts associated with
Napper, I.E., Bakir, A., Rowland, S.J., & Thompson, R.C. (2015) newly discovered species of Osedax polychaete worms. Appl. Environ.
Characterisation, quantity and sorptive properties of microplastics Microbiol. 73: 2314–2323.
extracted from cosmetics. Mar. Poll. Bull. 99: 178–185. Goffredi, S.K., Orphan, V.J., Rouse, G.W., et al. (2005) Evolutionary
Oberbeckmann, S., Osborn, A.M., & Duhaime, M.B. (2016) Microbes innovation: A bone-eating marine symbiosis. Environ. Microbiol. 7:
on a bottle: Substrate, season and geography influence community com­ 1369–1378.
position of microbes colonizing marine plastic debris. PLoS One 11: Miyamoto, N., Yoshida, M., Koga, H., & Fujiwara, Y. (2017) Genetic
e0159289. mechanisms of bone digestion and nutrient absorption in the bone-eating
Oliveira, M., Almeida, M., & Miguel, I. (2019) A micro(nano)plastic boo­ worm Osedax japonicus inferred from transcriptome and gene expression
merang tale: A never ending story? Trends Anal. Chem. 112: 196–200. analyses. BMC Evol. Biol. 17: 17.
Porter, A., Lyons, B.P., Galloway, T.S., & Lewis, C. (2018) Role of marine Parte, S., Sirisha, V.L., & D’Souza, J.S. (2017) Biotechnological applica­
snows in microplastic fate and bioavailability. Environ. Sci. Technol. tions of marine enzymes from algae, bacteria, fungi, and sponges. Adv.
52:.7111–7119. Food Nutr. Res. 80: 75–106.
Reisser, J., Shaw, J., Hallegraeff, G., et al. (2014) Millimeter-sized marine Popovic, A., Tchigvintsev, A., Tran, H., et al. (2015) Metagenomics as
plastics: A new pelagic habitat for microorganisms and invertebrates. a tool for enzyme discovery: Hydrolytic enzymes from marine-related
PLoS One 9: e100289. metagenomes. In: Prokaryotic Systems Biology. Springer, Cham, pp.
1–20.
Romera-Castillo, C., Pinto, M., Langer, T.M., et al. (2018) Dissolved
organic carbon leaching from plastics stimulates microbial activity in the Smith, C.R., Glover, A.G., Treude, T., et al. (2015) Whale-fall ecosystems:
ocean. Nat. Commun. 9: 1430. Recent insights into ecology, paleoecology, and evolution. Ann. Rev. Mar.
Sci. 7: 571–596.
Teuten, E.L., Saquing, J.M., Knappe, D.R.U., et al. (2009) Transport and
release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to wildlife. Beacham, T.A., Sweet, J.B., & Allen, M.J. (2017) Large scale cultiva­
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364: 2027–2045. tion of genetically modified microalgae: A new era for environmental risk
assessment. Algal Res. 25: 90–100.
Thompson, R.C., Olsen, Y., Mitchell, R.P., et al. (2004) Lost at sea: Where
is all the plastic? Science 304: 838. Gupta, A., Barrow, C.J., & Puri, M. (2012) Omega-3 biotechnology:
Thraustochytrids as a novel source of omega-3 oils. Biotechnol. Adv. 30:
Woodall, L.C., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Canals, M., et al. (2014) The deep sea
1733–1745.
is a major sink for microplastic debris. R. Soc. Open Sci. 1: 140317.
Lian, J., Wijffels, R.H., Smidt, H., & Sipkema, D. (2018) The effect of
World Economic Forum (2016) The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking
the algal microbiome on industrial production of microalgae. Microb.
the future of plastics. Available online: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/
Biotechnol. 11: 806–818.
WEF_The_New:Plastics_Economy.pdf (accessed 2 February 2019).
58 References

Milano, J., Ong, C., Masjuki, H.H., et al. (2016) Microalgae biofuels as an Cabello, F.C., Godfrey, H.P., Buschmann, A.H., & Dölz, H.J. (2016)
alternative to fossil fuel for power generation. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. Aquaculture as yet another environmental gateway to the development
58: 180–197. and globalisation of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16:
Shuba, E.S. & Kifle, D. (2018) Microalgae to biofuels: ‘promising’ alter­ e127–133.
native and renewable energy, review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81: Charoonnart, P., Purton, S., Saksmerprome, V., et al. (2018) Applications
743–755. of microalgal biotechnology for disease control in aquaculture. Biology
Vinayak, V., Manoylov, K.M., Gateau, H., et al. (2015) Diatom milking: A (Basel) 7: 24.
review and new approaches. Mar. Drugs 13: 2629–2665. Collins, C., Lorenzen, N., & Collet, B. (2019) DNA vaccination for finfish
Xue, Z., Yu, W., Liu, J., et al. (2018) Edible oil production from microal­ aquaculture. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 85: 106–125.
gae: A review. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 120: 1700428. Dadar, M., Dhama, K., Vakharia, V.N., et al. (2017) Advances in aqua­
Bibi, F., Faheem, M., Azhar, E.I., et al. (2017) Bacteria from marine culture vaccines against fish pathogens: Global status and current trends.
sponges: A source of new drugs. Curr. Drug Metab. 18: 11–15. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 25: 184–217.

Dias, D.A., Urban, S., & Roessner, U. (2012) A historical overview of Dalmo, R.A. (2018) DNA vaccines for fish: Review and perspectives on
natural products in drug discovery. Metabolites 2: 303–336. correlates of protection. J. Fish Dis. 41: 1–9.

Gerwick, W.H. & Fenner, A.M. (2013) Drug discovery from marine Dittmann, K.K., Rasmussen, B.B., Castex, M., et al. (2017) The aquacul­
microbes. Microb. Ecol. 65: 800–806. ture microbiome at the centre of business creation. Microb. Biotechnol.
10: 1279–1282.
ul Hassan, S.S., Anjum, K., Abbas, S.Q., et al. (2017) Emerging biophar­
maceuticals from marine actinobacteria. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. Hølvold, L.B., Myhr, A.I., & Dalmo, R.A. (2014) Strategies and hurdles
49: 34–47. using DNA vaccines to fish. Vet. Res. 45: 21.

Mans, D.R. (2016) Exploring the global animal biodiversity in the search Merrifield, D.L. & Carnevali, O. (2014) Probiotic modulation of the gut
for new drugs–marine invertebrates. J. Transl. Sci. 2: 170–179. microbiota of fish. In: Aquaculture Nutrition. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.,
Chichester, UK, pp. 185–222.
Ali, I., Peng, C., Khan, Z.M., & Naz, I. (2017) Yield cultivation of mag­
netotactic bacteria and magnetosomes: A review. J. Basic Microbiol. 57: Merrifield, D.L., Dimitroglou, A., Foey, A., et al. (2010) The current sta­
643–652. tus and future focus of probiotic and prebiotic applications for salmonids.
Aquaculture 302: 1–18.
Charrier, M., Li, D., Mann, V.R., et al. (2019) Engineering the S-Layer of
Caulobacter crescentus as a foundation for stable, high-density, 2D living Munang’andu, H. (2018) Intracellular bacterial infections: A challenge
materials. ACS Synth. Biol. 8: 181–190. for developing cellular mediated immunity vaccines for farmed fish.
Microorganisms 6: 33.
Farjadian, F., Moghoofei, M., Mirkiani, S., et al. (2018) Bacterial com­
ponents as naturally inspired nano-carriers for drug/gene delivery and Nayak, S.K. (2010) Probiotics and immunity: A fish perspective. Fish
immunization: Set the bugs to work? Biotechnol. Adv. 36: 968–985. Shellfish Immunol. 29: 2–14.

Gordon, R., Losic, D., Tiffany, M.A., et al. (2009) The glass menagerie: Pérez-Sánchez, T., Mora-Sánchez, B., & Balcázar, J.L. (2018) Biological
Diatoms for novel applications in nanotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 27: approaches for disease control in aquaculture: Advantages, limitations
116–127. and challenges. Trends Microbiol. 26: 896–903.

Li, Y.-T., Tian, Y., Tian, H., et al. (2018) A review on bacteriorhodopsin­ Ringø, E., Olsen, R.E., Gifstad, T.Ï., et al. (2010) Prebiotics in aquacul­
based bioelectronic devices. Sensors 18: 1368. ture: A review. Aquac. Nutr. 16: 117–136.

Mishra, M., Arukha, A.P., Bashir, T., et al. (2017) All new faces of dia­ Rodiles, A., Rawling, M.D., Peggs, D.L., et al. (2018) Probiotic appli­
toms: Potential source of nanomaterials and beyond. Front. Microbiol. cations for finfish aquaculture. In: Probiotics and Prebiotics in Animal
8: 1239. Health and Food Safety. Springer, Cham, pp. 197–217.

Patil, M.P. & Kim, G.-D. (2018) Marine microorganisms for synthesis of Salonius, K., Siderakis, C., MacKinnon, A.M., & Griffiths, S.G. (2005)
metallic nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. Colloids Surf. Use of Arthrobacter davidanieli as a live vaccine against Renibacterium
B: Biointerfaces 172: 487–495. salmoninarum and Piscirickettsia salmonis in salmonids. Dev. Biol. 121:
189–197.
Ragni, R., Cicco, S.R., Vona, D., & Farinola, G.M. (2018) Multiple routes
to smart nanostructured materials from diatom microalgae: A chemical Santos, L. & Ramos, F. (2018) Antimicrobial resistance in aquacul­
perspective. Adv. Mater. 30: 1704289. ture: Current knowledge and alternatives to tackle the problem. Int. J.
Antimicrob. Agents 52: 135–143.
Saeedi, P., Moosaabadi, J.M., Sebtahmadi, S.S., et al. (2012) Potential
applications of bacteriorhodopsin mutants. Bioengineered 3: 326–328. Sayes, C., Leyton, Y., & Riquelme, C. (2018) Probiotic bacteria as an
healthy alternative for fish aquaculture. Antibiotic Use in Animals. doi:
Skeffington, A.W. & Scheffel, A. (2018) Exploiting algal mineraliza­ 10.5772/intechopen.71206.
tion for nanotechnology: Bringing coccoliths to the fore. Curr. Opin.
Biotechnol. 49: 57–63. Watts, J.E.M., Schreier, H.J., Lanska, L., & Hale, M.S. (2017) The rising
tide of antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: Sources, sinks and solu­
Sleytr, U.B., Schuster, B., Egelseer, E.-M., & Pum, D. (2014) S-layers: tions. Mar. Drugs 15: e158.
Principles and applications. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38: 823–864.
Atad, I., Zvuloni, A., Loya, Y., & Rosenberg, E. (2012) Phage therapy of
Vala, A.K. (2014) Exploration on green synthesis of gold nanoparticles by the white plague-like disease of Favia favus in the Red Sea. Coral Reefs
a marine-derived fungus Aspergillus sydowii. 34: 194–197. 31: 665–670.
Vargas, G., Cypriano, J., Correa, T., et al. (2018) Applications of magneto- Bhandare, S., Colom, J., Baig, A., et al. (2018) Reviving phage therapy for
tactic bacteria, magnetosomes & magnetosome crystals in biotechnology the treatment of cholera. J. Infect. Dis. 219: 786–794.
and nanotechnology: Mini-review. Molecules 23: 2438.
Christiansen, R.H., Dalsgaard, I., Middelboe, M., et al. (2014) Detection
Adams, A. & Thompson, K.D. Biotechnology offers revolution to fish and quantification of Flavobacterium psychrophilum-specific bacterio­
health management. Trends Biotechnol. 24: 201–205. phages in vivo in rainbow trout upon oral administration: Implications for
disease control in aquaculture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80: 7683–7693.
References 59

Cohen, Y., Pollock, F.J., Rosenberg, E., & Bourne, D.G. (2013) Nakai, T., Sugimoto, R., Park, K.H., et al. (1999) Protective effects of bac­
Phage therapy treatment of the coral pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus. teriophage on experimental Lactococcus garvieae infection in yellowtail.
Microbiologyopen 2: 64–74. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 37: 33–41.
Crothers-Stomps, C., Høj L, Bourne, D.G., et al. (2010) Isolation of lytic Nelson, E.J., Harris, J.B., Morris, J.G., et al. (2009) Cholera transmission:
bacteriophage against Vibrio harveyi. J. Appl. Microbiol. 108: 1744–1750. The host, pathogen and bacteriophage dynamic. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7:
693–702.
Efrony, R., Atad, I., & Rosenberg, E. (2009) Phage therapy of coral white
plague disease: Properties of phage BA3. Curr. Microbiol. 58: 139–145. Richards, G.P. (2014) Bacteriophage remediation of bacterial pathogens
in aquaculture: A review of the technology. Bacteriophage 4: e975540.
Efrony, R., Loya, Y., Bacharach, E., & Rosenberg, E. (2007) Phage ther­
apy of coral disease. Coral Reefs 26: 7–13. Rørbo, N., Rønneseth, A., Kalatzis, P.G., et al. (2018) Exploring the effect
of phage therapy in preventing Vibrio anguillarum infections in cod and
Flegel, T.W., Pasharawipas, T., Owens, L., & Oakey, H.J. (2005) Evidence
turbot larvae. AntibiotIcs 7: 42.
for phage-induced virulence in the shrimp pathogen Vibrio harveyi. Dis.
Asian Aquac. V: 329–337. Teplitski, M. & Ritchie, K. (2009) How feasible is the biological control
of coral diseases? Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 378–385.
Gon Choudhury, T., Tharabenahalli Nagaraju, V., et al. (2017) Advances
in bacteriophage research for bacterial disease control in aquaculture. Verner-Jeffreys, D.W., Algoet, M., Pond, M.J., et al. (2007) Furunculosis
Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 25: 113–125. in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) is not readily controllable by bacte­
riophage therapy. Aquaculture 270: 475–484.
Górski, A., Międzybrodzki, R., Łobocka, M., et al. (2018) Phage therapy:
What have we learned? Viruses 10: 288. Vinod, M.G., Shivu, M.M., Umesha, K.R., et al. (2006) Isolation of Vibrio
harveyi bacteriophage with a potential for biocontrol of luminous vibrio­
Higuera, G., Bastías, R., Tsertsvadze, G., et al. (2013) Recently dis­
sis in hatchery environments. Aquaculture 255: 117–124.
covered Vibrio anguillarum phages can protect against experimentally
induced vibriosis in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Aquaculture 392–395: Wittebole, X., De Roock, S., & Opal, S.M. (2014) A historical overview
128–133. of bacteriophage therapy as an alternative to antibiotics for the treatment
of bacterial pathogens. Virulence 5: 226–235.
Huang, K. & Nitin, N. (2019) Edible bacteriophage based antimicrobial
coating on fish feed for enhanced treatment of bacterial infections in Kumar, J., Singh, D., Tyagi, M.B., & Kumar, A. (2019) Cyanobacteria:
aquaculture industry. Aquaculture 502: 18–25. Applications in biotechnology. In: Cyanobacteria, ed. by Mishra, A.K.,
Tiwari, D.N. and Rai, A.N., Academic Press, pp. 327–346,
Imbeault, S., Parent, S., Lagacé, M., et al. (2006) Using bacteriophages to
prevent furunculosis caused by Aeromonas salmonicida in farmed brook Luna, G.M. (2015) Biotechnological potential of marine microbes.
trout. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 18: 203–214. In: Springer Handbook of Marine Biotechnology. Springer, Berlin,
Heidelberg, pp. 651–661.
Jacquemot, L., Bettarel, Y., Monjol, J., et al. (2018) Therapeutic potential
of a new jumbo phage that infects Vibrio coralliilyticus, a widespread Martín-Rodríguez, A.J., Babarro, J.M.F., Lahoz, F., et al. (2015) From
coral pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 9: 2501. broad-spectrum biocides to quorum sensing disruptors and mussel repel­
lents: Antifouling profile of alkyl triphenylphosphonium salts. PLoS One
Kalatzis, P., Castillo, D., Katharios, P., et al. (2018) Bacteriophage inter­
10: e0123652.
actions with marine pathogenic vibrios: Implications for phage therapy.
Antibiotics 7: 15. Pessôa, M.G., Vespermann, K.A.C., Paulino, B.N., et al. (2019) Newly
isolated microorganisms with potential application in biotechnology.
Karunasagar, I., Shivu, M.M., Girisha, S.K., et al. (2007) Biocontrol of
Biotechnol. Adv. 37: 319–339.
pathogens in shrimp hatcheries using bacteriophages. Aquaculture 268:
288–292. Rahman, P.K.S.M., Mayat, A., Harvey, J.G.H., et al. (2019) Biosurfactants
and bioemulsifiers from marine algae. In, The Role of Microalgae in
Kellogg, C.A. (2007) Phage therapy for Florida corals? U.S. Geological
Wastewater Treatment. Springer, Singapore, pp. 169–188.
Surv. Fact Sheet 2007–3065.
Romano, S. (2018) Ecology and biotechnological potential of bacte­
Lomelí-Ortega, C.O. & Martínez-Díaz, S.F. (2014) Phage therapy against
ria belonging to the genus Pseudovibrio. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84:
Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection in the whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus
e02516-17.
vannamei) larvae. Aquaculture 434: 208–211.
Satheesh, S., Ba-akdah, M.A., & Al-Sofyani, A.A. (2016) Natural anti­
fouling compound production by microbes associated with marine mac­
roorganisms—A review. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 21: 26–35. 408

You might also like