In The Lahore High Court Lahore Judicial Department: Judgment Sheet
In The Lahore High Court Lahore Judicial Department: Judgment Sheet
Judgment Sheet
IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT LAHORE
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Federation:
M/s Mirza Nasar Ahmad, Additional Attorney
General and Tahir Mahmood Ahmad Khokhar
Deputy Attorney General.
Province:
Mr. Shahzad Shaukat, Advocate General, Punjab.
M/s Jawad Yaqoob Malik and Barrister Qasim Ali
Chowhan, Additional Advocates General,
M/s Barrister Hassan Khalid Ranjha, Barrister
Tayyab Jan and Sumera Hussain, Assistant
Advocates General.
President of Pakistan.
Mr. Ahmed Awais, Advocate assisted by M/s Tipu
Salman Makhdoom, Rai Shahid Saleem Khan, Ali
Awais, Moeen Ahmad, Hussain Awais and Belal
Awais, Advocates.
SHORT ORDER
For the reasons to be followed, decision on writ petitions and appeals heard
by this Bench is as under: -
“3. Turning to the second question and keeping in mind the answer to the
first, it is our view that the vote of any member (including a deemed
member) of a Parliamentary Party in a House that is cast contrary to
any direction issued by the latter in terms of para (b) of clause (1) of
Article 63A cannot be counted and must be disregarded, and this is so
regardless of whether the Party Head, subsequent to such vote,
proceeds to take, or refrains from taking, action that would result in a
declaration of defection. The second question referred to this Court
stands answered in the foregoing terms.”
[emphasis supplied]
Speaker) of the election held on 16th April 2022 is, therefore, directed to
recount votes after excluding 25 votes of the defecting members. As a
consequence, if required majority, under Article 130(4), is not secured by any
candidate, he shall proceed for second and further polls under its provisos for
completing the process of election as required under Article 130(4), unless a
candidate is elected by majority votes.
Though on recounting as directed, the consequential procedure and effect
shall be in accordance with the Constitution and Rules made thereunder,
nevertheless, for clarity it is explained that Hamza Shahbaz shall cease to be
Chief Minister, if he loses the required majority after exclusion of 25 votes by
Presiding Officer and the communication of his being elected candidate under
Rule 21 along with Notification dated 30.04.2022 shall deem to have been
quashed. In this eventuality, functions performed and powers exercised, by
Hamza Shahbaz as Chief Minister and his cabinet, in accordance with law,
shall be protected under the de facto doctrine.
3. The session, for this purpose, as originally called by the then Governor shall
be resumed on 1st July 2022 (Friday) at 4:00 pm without fail. All the
functionaries under the Constitution or law, within their respective share of
powers, shall act jointly and severally to implement the directions by this
Court. The session so resumed shall not be prorogued till the election process
is completed and Presiding officer intimates the result of elected Chief
Minister to the Governor under the Rule 21. The Governor shall preform his
duty, under Article 130(5), of administering oath without any hesitation and
by ignoring any apprehension regarding conduct election, at any time before
11:00 am very next day.
We cannot ignore the disorder in various sessions of the Provincial Assembly,
therefore are constrained to observe and direct that any attempt of disorder
from any quarter shall be taken as contempt of court and shall be proceeded
accordingly by this Larger Bench on formal information by any person.
4. We allow writ petitions to the extent and manner noted above, however, rest
of the prayers in the petitions are declined by dismissing the petitions to this
extent.
W.P.Nos.30456, 30459,34726, 32665, 30670, 30569 of 2022 &
ICA Nos.27313, 28417 and 28418 of 2022
5
5. We appreciate that on our verbal instructions, the print and electronic media
has reported proceedings before this Bench professionally and carefully,
however, some Vloggers have scandalised the proceedings recently. We,
therefore, direct the FIA and PEMRA, having jurisdiction in the matter, to
take legal action on their own notice and if so informed by any person. This
Larger Bench shall initiate contempt proceedings for scandalizing the
proceedings before it, if so brought formally before this Court by any person.
(iii) The direction to hold second poll, in no way, would nullify any
direction of Hon’ble Supreme Court as no role of Presiding
Officer/State functionaries is being assumed for conduct of election
and the Hon’ble Division Bench only ordered to ensure conduct of
elections in a fair, transparent and impartial manner, strictly as per
the dictates of the Constitution and the Rules of Procedure of the
Provincial Assembly of the Punjab, 1997.
(iv) Total membership of the Punjab Assembly is 371, the requisite
majority to become Chief Minister is 186 votes. It is evident from
record and admitted by Mr. Ali Zafar, Advocate for petitioners
before this Bench as well as in his written submissions that
respondent-Muhammad Hamza Shahbaz Sharif obtained 197 votes
which fact is also confirmed by the respondents, therefore, stance of
Mr. Amir Rawn, Advocate that actually 195 votes were cast in
favour of respondent does not restrict this Bench to order for second
poll as per the aforesaid provision of the Constitution so as to
implement the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court straightaway,
especially when petitions to the extent of challenging election as a
whole stand dismissed by this Bench.
(v) After excluding 25 votes of defectors, the remaining votes at the
credit of respondent-Muhammad Hamza Shahbaz Sharif are 172,
therefore, he is not member elected within the contemplation of
Article 130(4) of the Constitution and being a stranger to the office
of Chief Minister, cannot be allowed to hold the office; besides, it
will give political advantage to respondent over the other contesting
candidate, thus, office of a non-elected member cannot be protected
which even otherwise appear to be against the mandate of Article
133 of the Constitution;
(vi) Such disqualification will commence from the date when the
Notification declaring the respondent as elected was issued, thus, the
respondent is required to be de-notified;
CONCLUSION