Sample Draft Case Study - PNP & PDEA

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

1

Chapter I

Introduction

The world drug problem, including its political, economic, social, and

environmental costs, constitutes a complex, dynamic, and multi-causal

phenomenon that presents a challenge to the country and its government. The

results of the Dangerous Drugs Board’s latest survey on the drug use situation

in the Philippines show the demand reduction activities involved community

officials and/or local police going to the homes of known users and asking

them to voluntarily surrender and receive treatment (Raymundo, 2017).

With the introduction of the War on Drugs campaign of the government,

it is accorded based on the government’s official count through its campaign.

There are only 5.563 drug personalities have been killed in legitimate police

operations. Before that, however, the Philippine National Police (PNP) itself

reported a higher number, 6.600 drug suspects killed. This means that the rate

of drug-related cases in the country has decreased because of the

implementation of the War on Drugs in the country. The Philippine Drug

Enforcement Agency (PDEA) has also reported that 92% of barangays 1 in the

National Capital Region are affected by illicit drug use (PDEA, 2015). Barangay

is the smallest political unit in the Philippines. Each municipality or city is

therefore made up of barangays (PhilAtlas, 2021).


2

Moreover, drug use is a complex phenomenon, and there is a need for a

holistic perspective on the issue of drug use. Research of community-based

drug recovery in China reports that a lack of coordination, divergent attitudes,

and conflicting targets for police and health officials undermine the shared goal

of treatment (Ma et al., 2016). The Philippines’ Dangerous Drugs Board (2016)

has reported that 90% of those voluntarily surrendered could be treated in the

community (Cepeda, 2016). However, like most countries in Asia, the

Philippines has primarily employed compulsory residential treatment in

resolving illicit drug use problems. Given the overwhelming number of clients,

communities have created their own programs of community services like

cleaning, beautification, tree planting, gardening, and recreational activities

such as sports, zumba, and yoga. Moreover, counseling and spiritual

formation, including Bible study and prayer groups, are also initiated (Vuong et

al., 2017).

In the context of the Philippines, since taking office in June 2016,

President Rodrigo Roa Duterte has launched an immense campaign against

criminality and the illegal drug trade that has resulted in the deaths of

suspected drug personalities and criminals in the country. In his

administration’s anticrime and anti-drug campaign, the president gives police

officers an order to gun down criminals and drug dealers and promises them a

reward for catching drug suspects. Further, it is implemented upon the

approval by the Chief, PNP, in consonance with the six-month extension of

President Duterte to eradicate illegal drugs in the country. There are expected
3

in the implementation of this program: (1) a more balanced, effective, efficient,

and intensive yet more humane law enforcement operations against illegal

drugs; (2) an aggressive approach will be implemented targeting those high-

profile personalities involved in the illegal drug trade; (3) more engagement and

collaboration of the PNP with different government agencies, LGUs, NGOs, and

the community to establish the ‘wholeof-nation approach’ particularly in the

conduct of barangay drug-clearing operations anchored on the principle of

reciprocal responsibility to establish a drug-free community; (4) significant

downtrend in the national crime volume; (5) a lasting change for a safer and a

more secured community (PNP Command Memorandum Circular No. 16-2016).

In Manila, Philippines, four individuals were killed when enforcers of the

Duterte administration’s anti-drug campaign fired at each other in Quezon City

on February 24, 2021. The reason is the failure to coordinate. The Senate has

since launched an investigation into the supposed “misencounter” between

operatives of the Philippine National Police (PNP) and the Philippine Drug

Enforcement Agency (PDEA), whose main office, ironically, is within the police’s

national headquarters in Camp Crame. So far, there has been a push for the

PNP and PDEA to streamline their operations and strengthen coordination with

each other, Rappler writer, Jairo Bolledo (2021).


4

Statement of the Problem

1. What is the relationship between PNP & PDEA misencounter?

2. What could be the reason of PNP & PDEA misencounter?

3. Why there is misencounter between PNP & PDEA?

4. What is the importance of unified guidelines between PNP & PDEA/

Chapter II

Discussion
5

Chapter 3

Conclusion & Recommendations

This chapter presents the conclusion along with the recommendations

formulated in this study.

Conclusion

Based on the data gathered on this study, the following are the

conclusions.

Recommendations

Based on the conclusions of the study, the following are the

recommendations.
6

Definition of Terms
7

Probations of law related to the Misencounter of PNP & PDEA in

Quezon City
8

Documentation

You might also like