Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nelson - Arizona Default

    Uploaded by

    Robert Gehrke
    120 views2 pages
    A default judgment was entered against Nelson Partners by an Arizona court after an architecture firm sued the student housing developer alleging more than $600,000 in unpaid bills.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    A default judgment was entered against Nelson Partners by an Arizona court after an architecture firm sued the student housing developer alleging more than $600,000 in unpaid bills.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    120 views2 pages

    Nelson - Arizona Default

    Uploaded by

    Robert Gehrke
    A default judgment was entered against Nelson Partners by an Arizona court after an architecture firm sued the student housing developer alleging more than $600,000 in unpaid bills.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Case 2:22-cv-00549-DJH Document 17 Filed 06/10/22 Page 1 of 2

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
    8
    9 Rosemann & Associates PC, NO. CV-22-00549-PHX-DJH
    10 Plaintiff,
    DEFAULT JUDGMENT
    11 v.
    12 Nelson Partners Property Management
    Incorporated, et al.,
    13
    Defendants.
    14
    15 Pursuant to Rule 55(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, default
    16 judgment is hereby entered as follows: A. That the March 2, 2022 AAA arbitration award

    17 entered against Defendants (the “Final Award”) in favor of Plaintiff is confirmed


    18 pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 9. B. Judgment is awarded in conformity with the Final Award, in

    19 favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and severally, for claims related to the

    20 Mark Project, in the amount of $435,754.73 plus interest on that sum at the rate of One
    21 Percent (1%) per month compounded until paid. C. Judgment is awarded in conformity
    22 with the Final Award, in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and severally,

    23 for claims related to the Wildcat Project in the amount of $43,765.12 plus interest on that

    24 sum at the rate of One Percent (1%) per month compounded until paid. D. Judgment is

    25 awarded in conformity with the Final Award, in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants,

    26 jointly and severally, for attorneys’ fees in the Underlying Mediation in the amount of
    27 $20,939.00 plus interest thereon at the Arizona statutory rate of Ten Percent (10%) per
    28 year from the date of the Final Award until paid. E. Judgment is awarded in conformity
    Case 2:22-cv-00549-DJH Document 17 Filed 06/10/22 Page 2 of 2

    1 with the Final Award, in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and severally,
    2 for costs in the Underlying Arbitration in the amount of $10,475.00 plus interest thereon
    3 at the Arizona statutory rate of Ten Percent (10%) per year from the date of the Final
    4 Award until paid.
    5 Debra D. Lucas
    District Court Executive/Clerk of Court
    6
    7 June 10, 2022
    8 s/ L. Dixon
    By Deputy Clerk
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28

    -2-

    You might also like