Mansion Party TRO Petition E-Filed
Mansion Party TRO Petition E-Filed
Defendants.
El Paso County Attorney Jo Anne Bernal brings this suit on behalf of the State of Texas to
enjoin and abate a common nuisance, and to prevent irreparable injury, loss, harm and damage,
and files this Original Petition For Abatement and Application for Temporary Restraining Order
against the named Defendants, including an in rem defendant, pursuant to the Texas Rules of
Civil Procedure (TRCP) 680 for violations of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code (CPRC)
Chapter 125, and Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code Chapter (TABC) 101, as the Defendants
maintain their property in a way that creates a common nuisance violating the TABC and poses
an immediate threat of irreparable injury, loss or damage that will result if the conduct occurring
I.
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff, the State of Texas (hereinafter, “State” or “Plaintiff”), appears and is
represented by and through the El Paso County Attorney Jo Anne Bernal, with her principal
office located at 500 E. San Antonio Ave, Room 503, El Paso, Texas 79901, and is duly
authorized under the TRCP and TABC to bring this cause of action to restrain, enjoin and have
abated activities declared to be a common nuisance. The State is not required to verify facts in
support of the request and application for injunctive relief to abate the nuisance activity under
TABC.1 The County provides affidavits and evidence to show irreparable injury, loss, harm and
damage.
2. Defendant, the real property 5081 Fort Defiance, El Paso, Texas 79938 (in rem)
(hereinafter, “Defendant Ft. Defiance” or the “Property”), is zoned residential but is advertised as
a commercial property where events such as parties, pool parties, and other entertainment
gatherings are held for profit. Service of citation may be had upon Ft. Defiance by posting
citation at the Property, by serving the person in care, custody, control or management of or by
serving its property owner, Priscilla Chavez 5081 Fort Defiance Drive El Paso, Texas 79938 or
individual doing business in El Paso County and maintains and/or assists in maintaining the
common nuisances described herein, as the property owner of 5081 Fort Defiance Dr., El Paso,
Texas 79938. Service of citation may be had upon Defendant P. Chavez at 5081 Fort Defiance
a Domestic Limited Liability Company. Service of citation may be had upon Mansion
1
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 125.002(a) and TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE §§ 101.10 and 101.70, permission by
Attorney General’s Office.
Promotions LLC. by serving one of its registered agents, Gabriel A. Chavez 5081 Fort Defiance
doing business in El Paso County and maintains and/or assists in maintaining the common
nuisances described herein of 5081 Fort Defiance Dr., El Paso, Texas 79938. Service of citation
may be had upon Defendant Gabriel A. Chavez at 5081 Fort Defiance Dr., El Paso, Texas 79938
unregistered entity. Exhibits 1 and 2. Service of citation may be had upon GMT Promotions
ENT. by its registered agent, Jesse Hayward Bruce Jr. at 5208 Nome Ave., El Paso, Texas 79924
doing business in El Paso County and maintains and/or assists in maintaining the common
nuisances described herein of 5081 Fort Defiance Dr., El Paso, Texas 79938. Service of citation
may be had upon Defendant Jesse Hayward Bruce Jr. at 5208 Nome Ave., El Paso, Texas 79924
this petition.
II.
DISCOVERY
9. The Plaintiff intends for this case to be governed under Level II Discovery Plan in
III.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
10. Venue and Jurisdiction is proper in El Paso County, Texas because all or part of the acts
or omissions giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred in El Paso County, Texas, and the Property
11. The court has subject matter jurisdiction to hear the application for temporary restraining
order without hearing because the Defendants violate and will continue to violate a provision of
the TABC.3 This Court also has subject matter and personal jurisdiction over the cause and
parties based on the CPRC. The real property made the basis of this cause of action is a common
nuisance as maintained.4 This Court also has subject matter and personal jurisdiction over the
cause and parties based on the CPRC. The real property made the basis of this cause of action is
12. The TABC prescribes mandatory venue of an action to enjoin and abate a common
nuisance in the county in which the nuisance is alleged to exist.6 All allegations have occurred in
13. The court has subject matter and personal jurisdiction over the cause and parties for the
State’s applications for temporary restraining order because the Property made the basis of this
14. The Property upon which the Defendants are maintaining a common nuisance is located
IV.
SUMMARY
2
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 15.016.
3
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE § 101.01(a).
4
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 125.002(a)
5
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 125.002(a)
6
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE § 101.70.
7
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE, § 101.70.
15. The property at 5081 Fort Defiance, El Paso, Texas 79938 is a large house where parties
at the residence are known as “Mansion parties”, hosted by Defendants Mansion Promotions
(a.k.a. Mansion Boys) and GMT Promotions. Defendants Mansion Promotions and GMT
Promotions use social media to advertise parties where they charge a fee for entrance to the
property. The parties are advertised to start around at ten p.m. and go well into the next day. The
parties attract hundreds of young people and juveniles, from ages approximately 15 – 26. As the
Property is located in the county, local law enforcement is not able to meet the demands and
answer all the calls and problems that arise from the parties. Since April of 2022, the El Paso
Sheriff’s Office (EPSO) has responded to assaults, aggravated assaults, shots fired, and general
nuisance calls. Defendant Priscilla and Gabriel Chavez are currently under indictment for money
laundering, and Defendant Chavez is obligated to register quarterly as a sex offender for
aggravated sexual assault of a child in 2002. Evidence obtained through social media shows
young looking people at the party in crowded spaces pouring alcohol from liquor bottles directly
into their mouths. There have been several incidents where party patrons, including juveniles,
have needed emergency medical treatment for what they consumed at the Property.
V.
FACTS
16. The Plaintiff received affidavits from law enforcement officers employed by the EPSO:
of young people to the quiet neighborhood where there are easily “100 – 200” vehicles parked on
5 other deputies on his shift have attempted to warn people about the party, but were
largely ignored.
ii. Vehicles are parked in the middle of the street and block driveways.
iii. Parties typically attract 300 – 400 young people between the ages of 15 –
iv. Sgt. Chavarria has seen intoxicated drivers, juveniles asleep or passed out
on the shoulder of the roadway, people driving without lights, fights, crying females, and
v. On June 18, Sgt. Chavarria came in contact with two separate people who
were found unresponsive. Sgt. Chavarria believes that had medical personnel not been
there to assist, the two individuals would have died from their accidental overdose.
During this time, people identified as security at the Property watched from behind a
A 16 year old female who had stopped breathing was resuscitated with CPR. The
female’s 16-year old cousin admitted they were drinking inside the house and the security
did not check for IDs. The cousin also said it was easy to get alcohol inside, and there are
The other person on the road was a male who was not breathing. Emergency
medical services had to use used a device called Narcan that treats and reverses opioid
vi. Sgt. Chavarria asserts that the parties are increasing to two nights a week
(Friday and Saturday), and if they continue violent crimes will occur and hundreds of
intoxicated juveniles will be on the street and roadways. Sgt. Chavarria believes that the
only way to end the dangers arising from the parties on the Property is to end the parties
at the Property.
b. Dep. Alejandro Luna has responded to the Property while on-duty. Exhibit 4.
i. While on the grave-yard shift, Dep. Luna has encountered juveniles that
ii. On August 6, 2022, Dep. Luna drove by a car near the Property with the
passenger door open. He turned around to check and saw a male face down in the dirt
not moving. The deputy saw vomit on the male, the ground and his car. Deputy Luna
asked the male if he was ok, and noticed he could not sit up on his own and looked as if
her was going to choke. The deputy requested life ambulance. Dep. Luna was able to
discover that the male came from the party at Fort defiance, and he consumed alcohol,
17. Deputy Carolina Perez provided information on the reports generated with the case
numbers associated with the incidents and a description of the criminal activity. This chart is
included as exhibit 5 and was used to keep count of the violations occurring at the Property.
18. Videos posted on social media show the events at the Property. This evidence is made
a. Exhibit 6 shows young people that appear to be juveniles in crowded rooms consuming
liquor, poured directly into their mouths. Outside, there are shots fired and the video abruptly
ends.
b. Exhibit 7 also shows liquor consumption and a person in the crowd wearing a high
related to the Property, listed in exhibit 5. Noted here, as mentioned above, and in the affidavits
of law enforcement, the parties start about 10 p.m. and end around 5 a.m. It is more likely that
while inside the Property, more violations than what has been documented have occurred. What
f. 3 Permit required for the sale of alcohol or license required for the sale of beer13
20. Since April of 2022, officers have encountered 52 violations of the Texas Penal Code and
the Texas Health and Safety Code (THSC). These encounters do not count those offenses that
arose out of the Property and reported later to the El Paso Police Department (such as sexual
assaults or DWIs). These offenses are also listed in exhibit 5 and include but are not limited to at
least:
8
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE § 105.06 Tex. Alco. Bev. Code §§ 106.04 and 106.06
9
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE § 106.03.
10
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE § 106.04.
11
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE § 106.05
12
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE § 106.06
13
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE §§ 11.01 and/or 61.01
14
TEX. HELTH & SFTY CODE, CHAPTER 481
15
TEX. PENAL CODE § 22.01(a)(1)
c. 2 violations for Assault on a Peace Officer16
21. The codes violated and noted in the paragraph above are also violations of the CPRC, and
22. The Property is 2.4300 acres, according to a 2021 tax statement. Exhibit 9.
23. Defendant Property is exempt as a “homestead” according to the records from the El Paso
Tax Assessor Collector. Exhibit 9. Defendants use Property for several businesses, including:
16
TEX. PENAL CODE § 22.01(a)(2)
17
TEX. PENAL CODE § 22.02(a)(2)
18
TEX. PENAL CODE § 29.02
19
TEX. PENAL CODE § 30.04
20
TEX. PENAL CODE § 46.02
21
TEX. PENAL CODE § 49.04
22
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 125.0015(a)(4).
23
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 125.0015(a)(9).
24
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 125.0015(12)
25
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 125.0015(a)(24).
26
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 125.0015(14)
24. The owner of the Property, Defendant Priscilla Chavez, is has charges pending against
25. Defendant Gabriel Chavez, who is the owner of Defendant Mansion Promotions, and the
son of Defendant Priscilla Chavez, has charges pending against him for 3 counts of Money
26. Defendant Gabriel Chavez is a registered sex offender required to report on a quarterly
27. On July 25, 2019, Defendant Priscilla Chavez is alleged to have violated the conditions of
her personal bond for hosting “multiple parties at residence located at 5081 Fort Defiance” and
28. On July 26, 2019, Defendant Gabriel Chavez is alleged to have violated the conditions of
her personal bond for hosting “multiple parties at residence located at 5081 Fort Defiance” and
29. On August 8, 2019 and October 25, 2019, the presiding Judge of Criminal District Court
1, the Hon. Diane Navarrete, amended Defendant Priscilla’s bond order to prohibit parties at the
30. On August 8, 2019 the presiding Judge of Criminal District Court 1, the Hon. Diane
Navarrete, amended Defendant Gabriel Chavez’s bond order to prohibit parties at the Property.
Exhibit 19.
31. On April 3, 2022, Deputy Javier Jimenez responded to an assault at a large party at the
Property. He estimates 100 cars were parked along the roadway and people were walking in the
street. Once inside the property, he saw hundreds of people at the location. People became
hostile towards the Deputies. Security would not allow officers to enter the Property. Dep.
Jimenez noticed many juveniles at the party that appeared intoxicated. He asked to talk to the
Defendant Priscilla Chavez. When she came out, the deputy reminded her of the problems with
parties at the house a few years ago. Defendant Priscilla Chavez responded that she had
permission from Judge Diane Navarrete to have parties. She did not have a copy of the order.
Dep. Jimenez received a call and exchanged email with Defendant Priscilla Chavez’s attorney,
32. Exhibit 20 contains the Affidavit of Deputy Jimenez in addition to emails exchanged with
Defendant Priscilla Chavez’s defense attorney, who also sent “Defendant’s Motion to Modify
Terms and Conditions of Release.” The motion appears to have been filed in Defendant Priscilla
33. The order contained in the documents sent to Dep. Jimenez in Exhibit 20 is signed by “D
Alcala” as presiding judge on April 18, 2022. According to Exhibit 21, this order is not filed.
34. The State could not locate any motion or orders to modify the conditions of Defendant
Gabriel Chavez’s bond, so the condition that there should be “no parties” at his residence, the
35. Defendants Mansion Promotions, GMT Entertainment and Bruce, continually advertise
36. The Property is maintained as a place where persons violate and will likely continue to
37. As mandated by the TABC, the County Attorney’s Office prepared an application for a
temporary restraining order to begin proceedings in district court to restrain the Defendants from
violating the TABC.28 The State brings this Original Application for Restraining Order to
27
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE §§ 101.01 and 101.70(a).
28
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE, § 101.10(a).
temporarily restrain the Property and the Defendants from hosting or allowing parties or any
38. The Property is a place where persons habitually go for the purpose of engaging in
crimes. Defendants knowingly tolerate the activity and fail to make reasonable attempts to abate
these activities.
V.
APPLICABLE LAW AND STATUTORY AUTHORITY
39. The Plaintiff incorporates and re-alleges the paragraphs above as though set forth herein.
40. Generally, injunctive relief is properly issued only when an applicant shows a probable
right of recovery, probable injury, and that there is no other adequate remedy at law available.30
41. A county attorney has authority to institute an action for injunctive relief to restrain a
Section 101.01 of the TABC sets out the procedure for obtaining a restraining order. If a credible
person informs the County Attorney by affidavit that a person is violating or is about to violate a
provision of the TABC, the County Attorney “shall begin proceedings in district court to restrain
the person from violating the code or operating under the permit or license.”31
42. When an applicant shows a violation of a statute that authorizes injunctive relief, the
applicant need not prove imminent, irreparable injury, or that the legal remedy is inadequate.32
29
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE, § 101.10.
30
See PILF Investments, Inc. v. Arlitt, 940 S.W.2d 255, 258 (Tex. App. - San Antonio 1997, no writ); Home Sav. of
America, F.A. v. Van Cleave Dev. Co., 737 S.W.2d 58, 59 (Tex. App. - San Antonio 1987, no writ).
31
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE § 101.01(a).
32
8100 N. Freeway Ltd. v. City of Houston, 329 S.W.3d 858, 862 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.),
and see Schleuter v. City of Fort Worth, 947 S.W.2d 920, 932 (Tex. App. - Fort Worth 1997, pet. denied) (city
ordinance); Bexar County v. North East Indep. Sch. Dist., 802 S.W.2d 854, 859 (Tex. App. - San Antonio 1990, writ
denied) (statute); San Miguel v. City of Windcrest, 40 S.W.3d 104 2000).
43. If the evidence shows that a TABC violation has occurred or is occurring, the State is
entitled to appropriate injunctive relief to prevent the violation from continuing or occurring. No
evidence of imminent harm, irreparable injury, or the absence of an adequate remedy at law is
44. The court may issue a restraining order without a hearing, and on notice and hearing may
grant an injunction to prevent the threatened or further violation or operation. The court may
require the complaining party to file a bond in an amount and with the conditions the court finds
necessary.34
45. Relevant violations of the TABC are committed going to, attending, or departing from
events at the Property, and include, but are not limited to:
a. Sec. 11.01(a) Permit Required – No person who has not who has not first obtained a
permit of the type required for the privilege may, in a wet area, do any of the
following: (1) manufacture, distill, brew, sell, possess for the purpose of sale, import
into this state, export from this state, transport, distribute, warehouse or store liquor or
(2) solicit or take order for liquor.35
b. Sec. 61.01 License Required – No person may manufacture or brew beer for the
purpose of sale, import it into this state, distribute or sell it, or possess it for the
purpose of sale without having first obtained an appropriate license or permit as
provided in this code.36
33
Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, 385 S.W.3d 592 at 601 (Tex. App. – El Paso 2012).
34
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE § 101.01(b).
35
This is interpreted by the TABC to include “free” alcoholic beverages when a person must pay a cover charge for
entrance. This means an advertisement for “$10 cover, and free beer until 10pm” is a violation.
36
Id, as applied to beer.
f. Sec. 106.06 Purchase of Alcohol for a Minor; Furnishing Alcohol to a Minor - A
person commits an offense if he purchases an alcoholic beverage for or gives or with
criminal negligence makes available an alcoholic beverage to a minor.
46. If the court issues a temporary restraining order, upon finding a person has violated the
B. CPRC 125
47. The Civil Practice and Remedies Code (CPRC) provides that a person maintains a
common nuisance if they maintain a place to which persons habitually go for any of the purposes
listed in the CPRC and they “knowingly tolerate the activity and fail to make reasonable attempts
48. A County Attorney has authority to enjoin and abate a nuisance in the county where the
nuisance exists. The suit may be brought against the person who is maintaining or about to
maintain the nuisance, against any person who maintains, owns, uses or is a party to the use of a
place for nuisance purposes constituting a nuisance, and may bring action in rem against the
place itself. All named Defendants either maintain, own, use or are a party to the use of the
property.39
49. Since April 2022, the following violations of the CPRC, that are a direct result of the
events held on the Property, have occurred. The description of the events are documented in
Exhibit 5 as Penal and Health and Safety Code violations. The Defendants have not made any
reasonable attempt to abate the activity. These violations include but are not limited to:
a. CPRC 125.0015 (9) – aggravated assault as described by Section 22.02, Penal Code;
37
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE § 101.01(c).
38
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §§ 125.0015(a) and 125.004(a).
39
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE section 125.002(b).
c. CPRC 125.0015 (a)(4) – unlawfully carrying a weapon as described by Section
46.02, Penal Code;
50. The Plaintiff incorporates and re-alleges the paragraphs above as though set forth herein.
51. To obtain extraordinary relief under TRCP 680, the State must show specific facts by
affidavit that there is immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage that will result to the
applicant before notice can be served and a hearing had thereon. The evidence provided in this
petition shows there is immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage that will result to the
people, including juveniles, that attend events at the Property. The affidavits provided to the
State show a clear risk to health, where people are not only so intoxicated on alcohol or drugs
that they need attention, they are not protected by the Defendants or their agents.
52. The affidavit of Sgt. Chavarria particularly discusses a situation with two people on the
same night who had medical emergencies because of the activities they participated in at the
Property. In addition, the hired security did nothing to aid or protect the people at the party.
Exhibit 3.
53. The affidavits of all law enforcement describe how they are woefully outnumbered when
responding to calls or emergencies at the Property. They describe juveniles that are intoxicated
on alcohol or drugs, people walking in the middle of the street, and no apparent protection or
help when it is needed, other than by the very limited resources of law enforcement.
54. The dangerous activity is documented and then posted on social media, as in exhibit X6
6, which shows a disturbing view of party goers drinking alcohol, and later hearing several shots
fired outside of the Property where there are many cars and people visible.
55. The specific remedy of a TRO is not provided for in this chapter, but the nature of the
CPRC violations and penal code violations rise to the level of danger that irreparable injury, loss,
harm and damage will occur if an immediate stop to the activity at the Property is not stopped.
56. Criminal activity documented in Exhibit 5, a compilation of reports of events made at the
f. Tex. Penal Code Sec. 22.01(a)(1) – A person commits an offense if the person
intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another, including the
person's spouse
g. Tex. Penal Code Sec. 22.01(b)(1) – A person commits an offense if the person
intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another, and the
offense is a felony of the third degree if the offense is committed against a person the
actor knows is a public servant while the public servant is lawfully discharging an
official duty, or in retaliation or on account of an exercise of official power or
performance of an official duty as a public servant;
h. Tex. Penal Code Sec. 22.02(a)(2) – A person commits an offense if the person
intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another and uses or
exhibits a deadly weapon during the commission of the assault.
Tex. Penal Code Sec. 29.02 - A person commits an offense if, in the course of
committing theft as defined in Chapter 31 and with intent to obtain or maintain
control of the property, he intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury
to another;
i. Tex. Penal Code Sec.30.04 - A person commits an offense if the person without the
effective consent of the owner, he breaks into or enters a vehicle or any part of a
vehicle with intent to commit any felony or theft.
k. Tex. Penal Code Sec. 49.04 - A person commits an offense if the person is
intoxicated while operating a motor vehicle in a public place.
l. Chapter 481 of the Texas Health and Safety Code – A person commits an offense
if the person possesses, delivers or uses a controlled substance, including marihuana,
cocaine, ecstasy, psylocibin, THC, etc.
57. The plaintiff is not required to give bond. A nuisance can be temporarily and permanently
enjoined. The final judgment is a judgment in rem and a judgment against the Defendants.
VI.
REQUEST FOR RELIEF
58. The Plaintiff incorporates and re-alleges the paragraphs above as though set forth herein.
59. The County Attorney received affidavits from credible persons informing her that the
named Defendants are violating provisions of the TABC and CPRC and allowing the Property to
cause danger to people in and around the Property, where violent criminal acts are committed
and the health and safety of the attendees of the events at the Property are at risk.40 Defendant
40
See exhibits attached.
Gabriel Chavez is a registered sex offender who lives on the Property and operates Defendant
Mansion Promotions on the property while juveniles attend events on the property. Upon
confirmation that Defendants were violating and will continue to violate the TABC and cause
immediate irreparable injury and damage, the County Attorney brought this action in district
60. Defendants have knowingly maintained and operated an entertainment business out of
their residence. Defendant Gabriel Chavez operates his business, Defendant Mansion Promotions
in flagrant violation of the Court’s Order against him with his pending charges.
61. The evidence shows that violations of the TABC and CPRC at events on the Property risk
the health and safety of the community have occurred or are occurring; so the State is entitled to
62. For violations of the TABC, no evidence of imminent harm, irreparable injury, or the
injunctive relief.42 To obtain injunctive relief, the State is required to show proof of imminent
harm, irreparable injury, and this burden is met with the proof provided in this petition for
violations of the CPRC and TABC, giving the Plaintiff a probable right to recovery.
63. The Plaintiff requests that the court issue a restraining order without a hearing, and grant
an injunction to prevent the threatened or further violation and operation, until such time a
64. The Plaintiff is exempt from bond and court costs under provisions of CPRC section
6.001.
41
TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE § 101.01(a)
Cook v. Tom Brown Ministries, 385 S.W.3d 592 at 601 (Tex. App. – El Paso 2012), and See TEX. ALCO. BEV.
42
El Paso, Texas 79938, the Property, for the use of parties or entertainment purposes is the only
remedy reasonably likely to prevent the use of the Property by Defendants in a way that violates
the TABC and causes imminent harm and irreparable injury to the community and law
promoting, maintaining or using the Property in any way for gatherings, parties,
b. Order all records and documents from April 1, 2019 to present, relating to business
conducted at the Property, including but not limited to the ownership, rental/lease, and
records relating to taxes, employees, clients and the businesses the use or operate out
of the Property.
c. Order Defendants to post on all social media platforms used to advertise, give notice
of and promote events at the Property: “NOTICE events held at the Mansion at 5081
Fort Defiance Drive El Paso, Texas 79938 are temporarily cancelled by court order”
and remain posted and visible until further order of the court.
66. Because of the ongoing illegal activity, an ex parte hearing on temporary restraining
order is warranted to prevent continuing harm to the community which would occur should the
67. The State requests any other reasonable requirements to prevent the ongoing nuisance
been represented by attorney Ray Velarde in the past, and the state will call Mr. Velarde in
compliance with the local rule to give notice of the ex parte hearing.
VIII.
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
69. All conditions precedent to the Plaintiff’s claim for relief have been performed or have
occurred.
X.
PRAYER
70. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Plaintiff prays that the Court grant
judgment in favor of the Plaintiff for a temporary restraining order, and other such relief; and issue
an order in rem against the premises located at as 5081 Fort Defiance Drive El Paso, Texas 79938
prohibiting the Defendants from operating, hosting, advertising, promoting, maintaining or using
the Property in any way for gatherings, parties, entertainments or social activity of any kind for
until a hearing within 14 days of the signing of a temporary restraining order. Further, the Plaintiff
prays for a temporary restraining order, and other such relief; and the issue an order against the
remaining named Defendants Priscilla Chavez, Mansion Promotions LLC., Gabriel Chavez, GMT
Promotions Entertainment and Bruce Jesse Hayward, Jr. ordering Defendants to not operate, host,
advertise, promote, maintain or use the property 5081 Fort Defiance Drive El Paso, Texas 79938
in any way for gatherings, parties, entertainments or social activity of any kind for until a hearing
within 14 days of the signing of a temporary restraining order. The Plaintiff prays that no bond be
required. Plaintiff specifically requests that a temporary injunction hearing be set within 14 days
Respectfully submitted,
JO ANNE BERNAL
El Paso County Attorney
500 East San Antonio, Room 503
El Paso, Texas 79901
Bus: (915) 546-2050
Fax: (915) 546-2133
BY: ______________________________
AMY MONSIVAIS
Assistant County Attorney
Texas Bar No. 24010472