Professional Documents
Culture Documents
La Dart v. Swift
La Dart v. Swift
INTRODUCTION
the owner of the rights to the creative elements of her published book “Lover.” The “Lover”
book was written and designed by TLD and published by AuthorHouse on January 12, 2010.
“Lover” was registered with the United States Copyright Office that same year. Defendant
Taylor Swift (“Swift”), along with the other Defendant Taylor Swift Productions, Inc. (“TSP”)
released the album “Lover” with an accompanying book (“the Swift and TSP ‘Lover’ book”) of
the same name on August 23, 2019. The Swift and TSP “Lover” book included a number of
creative elements that copied the expressive designs and arrangements of the TLD “Lover” book
FACTS
2. The TLD book, “Lover”, (the “TLD Work”) was written by TLD over a number of
years with the final compilation of writings and cover and internal designs and arrangements
1
Case 2:22-cv-02552 Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID 2
completed and published all together in 2010. The full book was registered for copyright on
February 5, 2010, under TX 7-143-843 (Exhibit A)(“TLD’s Registered Copyright”). The 2010
copyright registration used a full copy of the TLD Work as the deposit copy filed with the United
3. It is Plaintiff TLD’s view that the scope of the 2010 copyright registration for the full
TLD Work includes the entirety of the book, including all design and textual elements thereof.
4. The design and textual elements embodied within the TLD Work are original and
unique.
5. The Swift and TSP “Lover” book was released as part of Swift’s “Lover” album on
August 23, 2019, with all credits for design and textual elements claimed as works by Swift
(and/or TSP).
6. Upon information and belief, the Swift and TSP “Lover” book has achieved
considerable sales in association with the Swift “Lover” album through numerous different
sources (retail stores and on-line services, at least) and has reached at least 2.9 million copies
sold within the United States since its release date (over 4 million copies sold internationally).
7. Plaintiff TLD was not accorded any credits nor received any payments related to the
8. The Swift and TSP “Lover” book as released and published by Swift and TSP and
claiming all creative credits for Swift, as well, includes, at least, i) substantially the same format
components within a book, ii) with a substantially similar cover format, with the author
photographed in a downward pose, and color scheme (pastel pinks and blues) with the same title
(again, “Lover”), iii) with substantially the same introduction page formats with a similarly
2
Case 2:22-cv-02552 Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID 3
styled “Lover” title, as well as an earlier photograph of the author in a nature setting and turned
to the right and an accompanying forward with substantially similar greetings and wishes for the
reader, iv) with a substantially similar inner book design with interspersed photographs and
writings throughout the body thereof, v) and with a substantially similar back cover format, with
the author photographed in an upward pose (juxtaposed with the front cover pose), and, again, a
substantially similar color scheme (pastel pinks and blues), all in comparison with the creative
elements of the TLD Work designs owned by TLD in total, as well as protected by TLD’s
9. Stylistically, the Swift and TSP “Lover” book includes creative elements that are not
typical of or present within other published books and as compared with the TLD Work leaves
an overall impression that the Swift and TSP “Lover” book is, again, substantially similar in
terms of the above-noted design elements as those within the TLD Work.
10. The TLD Work was published in 2010 and made available through various channels
by publisher AuthorHouse, thus allowing for repeated and long-term access to Swift and TSP
(either directly or indirectly) until the Swift and TSP “Lover” book was released.
11. The Defendants to this day have neither sought, nor obtained, a license from TLD of
her creative design element rights, nor have they given any credit to TLD in relation to the TLD
Work and the infringing Swift and TSP “Lover” book release, let alone provided any monetary
payments for the TLD Work and the infringing Swift and TSP “Lover” release to the Plaintiff.
3
Case 2:22-cv-02552 Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID 4
CAUSE OF ACTION
12. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each of the foregoing Paragraphs as though fully set
forth herein. The Defendants’ reproduction, distribution, and sales of the infringing work, the
Swift and TSP “Lover” book in the United States and internationally, continue to this day, and
Defendants have not deigned to compensate the copyright owner of the Work (TLD) for the use
of the copyrighted work in the TLD Work. The Defendants’ reproduction, distribution, licensing,
merchandizing, and economic exploitation of the Swift and TSP “Lover” book, and authorizing
others to do the same, infringes Plaintiff’s exclusive rights under the Copyright Act.
13. As a direct and/or proximate result of the Defendants’ wrongful conduct, the Plaintiff
has been irreparably harmed, suffered damage, and Defendants have profited in an amount in the
14. One or more of the Defendants infringed on Plaintiff’s exclusive copyright in the
TLD Work when it distributed and sold the Swift and TSP “Lover” book and generated all other
economic exploitation thereof associated with the same. Such reproduction and release were
wholly unauthorized as it was without any license or consent of authority from the Plaintiff
(TLD). By virtue of this unauthorized commercial exploitation, Defendants have realized illegal
revenues.
exclusive copyright in the TLD Work (again, the TLD “Lover” book), Plaintiff has suffered
damages. Said injuries are continuing and will not abate in the future.
28. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), the Plaintiff is entitled to statutory damages since the
4
Case 2:22-cv-02552 Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID 5
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff TLD respectfully requests that judgment be entered against
A. For judgment that all of the Defendants, by virtue of their involvement with the
creation, publication, reproduction, public dissemination, and distribution of the Swift and TSP
B. For judgment assessing Defendants for the damages in excess of one million dollars
profits attributable to the infringement, or statutory damages (at Plaintiff’s election), under the
Copyright Act, as well as costs and attorney’s fees to the full extent provided for by Sections
501, 504 and 505 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 501, 504 and 505; damages and profits
shall include all profits and damages resulting from exploitation of the work domestically and
internationally.
Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff demands a trial
by jury as to all issues triable by jury, as enumerated and set forth in more detail in this
Complaint.
s/ William S. Parks
William S. Parks, BPR# 27681
William S. Parks, PLLC
172 W. Viking Drive
Cordova, Tennessee 38018
(901) 412-2755
[email protected]
Attorney for Plaintiff Teresa La Dart