Research 101

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

1.

The elements of the crime of acts lasciviousness are: (1) that the
offender commits any act of lasciviousness or lewdness; (2) that it is
done: (a) by using force and intimidation or (b) when the offended
party is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious, or (c) when the
offended party is under 12 years of age; and (3) that the offended
party is another person of either sex.

2. Criminal intent, referred to in the legal world as “mens rea,” refers to


an individual’s state of mind at the time he committed a crime. Those
with criminal intent are fully aware of what they are about to do and
the consequences that their actions can have. For instance, if Paul
thinks up a plan for how he is going to murder his wife, and then he
fatally shoots her, Paul is operating with criminal intent because he
knows that murder is wrong, yet he plans the act, and ultimately
commits it anyway.

Criminal intent can be classified as one of four different kinds of acts:


purposeful, knowing, reckless, and negligent. Criminal acts that are
done purposefully are those that are carried out by someone who is
fully aware of the consequences his actions can cause, such as the
murder example provided above. Criminal intent is a necessary
component in prosecuting a crime. If criminal intent does not exist,
then it stands to reason that the crime that was committed cannot
possibly be considered criminal in nature.

3. Offense necessarily included

A less serious crime that is necessarily committed during the


perpetration of a greater crime because the lesser crime contains
some of the same elements of the greater crime. The greater crime
cannot be proven unless all of the elements of the lesser crime are
proven. For example, trespassing is a lesser included offense of the
crime of burglary. See, e.g. Carter v. United States, 530 U.S. 255
(2000).

4. Unjust Vexation

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. SALVINO SUMINGWA ([G.R.


NO. 183619 : October 13, 2009)

Criminal Case No. 1655 for Unjust Vexation

Appellant was charged with Unjust Vexation, defined and penalized


by Article 287 of the RPC, which reads:

ART. 287. Light coercions. - Any person who, by means of violence,


shall seize anything belonging to his debtor for the purpose of
applying the same to the payment of the debt, shall suffer the penalty
of arresto mayor in its minimum period and a fine equivalent to the
value of the thing, but in no case less than 75 pesos.

Any other coercion or unjust vexation shall be punished by arresto


menor or a fine ranging from 5 to 200 pesos, or both.

The second paragraph of this provision is broad enough to include


any human conduct that, although not productive of some physical
or material harm, could unjustifiably annoy or vex an innocent
person. The paramount question to be considered is whether the
offender's act caused annoyance, irritation, torment, distress, or
disturbance to the mind of the person to whom it was directed.

You might also like