Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem

MOORISH DEED OF SECONDARY CONVEYANCE OF INCORPOREAL HERIDITAMENTS

AN AUTHENTICATED FOREIGN DOCUMENT
HAGUE CONVENTION, 5 OCTOBER 1961

PUBLIC NOTICE, DECLARATIONS,

AND LAWFUL PROTEST
THE LAW DOES NOT PERMIT IMPOSSIBILITIES

County of Marion )
)
State of Indiana Republic
united States of America Asservation )
) L.S._________________________________
Signed only in correct public capacity As beneficiary
to the Original 1786/1836 Treaty Trust Jurisdiction

NOTICE. The term “Original Jurisdiction” herein and in all other documents issued by Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel.
Wendell L. Brown) means the constitution for the united States of America, anno Domini 1787, and articles of
amendment anno Domini 1791 and other original parent agreements as indexed in Paragraph Number 12
below.

FIAT JUSTITIA, RUAT COELUM

Let Right Be Done, Though The Heavens Should Fall

I, Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) in public capacity as beneficiary to the Original Jurisdiction, being of
majority in age, competent to testify, a self-realized entity, a free Man upon his inherit soil, a Moor Autochthon
National of the North Amexem [American] Republic, human upon the free soil, a Moroccan American National
Citizen of the American Republic My yeas being yeas, My nays being nays, do hereby state that the truths and
facts herein are of first hand personal research, true, correct, complete, certain, and not misleading.

PUBLIC NOTICE

THIS DOCUMENT GIVES NOTICE TO all Public Officials by and through the Office of the Secretary of State,
the United States of America a/k/a UNITED STATES a/k/a U.S. a/k/a UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the
Office of the Secretary of State, the State of Indiana a/k/a STATE OF INDIANA a/k/a IN a/k/a "this State" and
to all whom it may concern, of the DECLARATIONS, LAWFUL PROTESTS and other matters contained
herein.

WHEN THIS NOTICE IS AFFIXED TO PREMISES, all property therein and attached thereto is
under the custody and control of the above-noted foreign official and not subject to intrusion
or seizure. THE BEARER OF THIS NOTICE has been duly notified to the Department of State
pursuant to International law and enjoys immunity from criminal and civil jurisdiction, arrest
and detention. Under international convention, the bearer should be treated with respect
and steps should be taken to prevent attack on the bearer‘s freedom, mobility interests and
property.
Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] Page |1
 Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem

DECLARATIONS
APPELATION, STATUS, AND FACTS

1. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, princeps: Menes Ankh-El(ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) of the family
„El‟ meaning „Of God‟ does herby state, assert and aver all of the following:

2. Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) is a living, breathing free Man upon inherit soil, an Ipso
Jure Moor and Autochthon National of the Amexem [America} Republic, de jure beneficiary to the Original
Jurisdiction.

3. Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) is not and cannot be a U.S. Citizen, subject, vessel or
"person" as defined in Title 26 United. States Code, Section 7701 or elsewhere, or any other ens legis artificial
person, individual, entity, fiction of law, procedural phantom or juristic personality, notwithstanding the
reproduction of any such fictions in any media, computer, record or instrument, written or electronic.

4. Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) is foreign to the United States and retains official treaty-
protected authority within His chosen jurisdiction. As beneficiary to the Original Jurisdiction, He is not subject to
nor does He volunteer to submit to or contract with any ens legis artificial or corporate jurisdiction to which a
United States person may be subject.

5. Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) reserves all Rights, Remedies and Defenses granted to
Him by The Creator and memorialized by Menes Ankh-El correct public capacity as beneficiary to the Original
Jurisdiction.

6. Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) waives no Rights, Remedies and Defenses nor yields
imprescriptibly Rights including, without limitation, the Right to movement and travel without restriction,
permission or license in any conveyance of His choosing on 'any public roadway in America, and the right to bear
arms for the protection of His family, friends and neighbors without restriction, unless such waiver is specifically
done so in writing.

7. Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) does not volunteer, consent, or contract to being
identified as, of, or connected by any nexus to, any institutional, bifurcated, public cestui que trust or other
fictional construction of law or ens legis entity of a political state or subdivision thereof, in any capacity including,
without limitation, as trustee, co-trustee, surety, co-surety, officer co-officer, fiduciary or co-fiduciary.

8. Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) the nature and character of his exact and proper
designation as:
™Menes Ankh-El®

Shall be written, formatted, printed, engraved and inscribed now and in perpetuity in all media exactly and precisely
as just above-written with a first and second given name separated from, and joined to, a family name by a mark of
punctuation or the words "of the family"; with the first letter of each given and family name being capitalized and all
other letters being written in lower case fully in accord with the Rules of English Grammar.

Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] Page |2
 Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem
9. Trade Mark notice. The name Menes Ankh-El by common law is Trade Marked ™ and all trade names and
derivatives thereof, whether or not registered, are Trade Marked™ by and property of Menes ankh-El(ex. rel.
Wendell L. Brown) to whom all rights are reserved. The use thereof without the express written permission of
Menes Ankh-El(ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) creates a voluntary an informed consensual contract obligating the
unauthorized user to the payment of a Trade Mark infringement fee as follows:

10. A Trade Mark infringement fee in the sum certain of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) lawful specie, gold, or silver,
American mint, or certified bullion, Lawful coin money at current spot market price pursuant to the Constitution
for the united States of America, 1787 anno Domini, amended anno Domini 1791, Article I, Section 10, Clause I,
shall apply to each unauthorized use of the designation Menes Ankh-El and to each attempt or event of
conversion, alteration, distortion and/or misnomer whether by improper spelling, abbreviation, capitalization,
initializing, reversal of parts, or conversion to a fiction of law or other juristic personality or artificial being.

11. The legal doctrine of idem sonans is inapposite to Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) whether oral or
written; all such improper usages and misnomers comprising infringement on the above-noticed copyright.

12. Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) does hereby accept the Original Jurisdiction, to wit:

A. Constitution for the united States of America, an no Domini 1787, Articles of Amendment anno Domini 1791;
B. National Bill of Rights, anno Domini 1776;
C. The Northwest Ordinance, anno Domini 1787;
D. 1786 Treaty of Peace and Friendship at Morocco with the seal of the Emperor of Morocco June 23, 1786 (25
Shaban, A. H. 1200)
E. United States Republic Constitution: Article III (3), Section two (2), Amendment V (5) (Liberty clause) and
Amendment IX (9) (Reservation of the Rights of the People).

13. Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) does hereby further state, assert and aver the following facts:

A. It is well established under public policy that citations, legislations, prescriptions and other presentments
issued by government bodies politic on the alleged authority of State codes comprise a cloak to disguise
collateral undertaking in U.S. Funds. All such offers want for authority under original organic State
Constitutions pursuant to which they are forbidden and can never be duly enacted.

B. The U.S. a.k.a. the United States is defined as a federal corporation at Title 28 USC 3002(15).

C. The United States is bankrupt pursuant to Perry v. United States, 294 US 330-381 (1935); 79 L. Ed 912.

D. United States is an obligor/grantor to the Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to the Federal Reserve Bank Act of
December 23,1913,38 Stat 265, Ch 6.

E. The said Federal Reserve Bank Act comprises a contractual granting by Congress to the Federal Reserve
Bank of a paramount and enduring (ex-warranto 1913-1933) lien on the assets of the United States and all
parties who would use bank notes issued by the Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to 38 Stat 265, Ch 6 p266-
267.

Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] Page |3
 Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem
F. The Congress of the United States, by authority of the Gold Bullion Coin Act of 1985, Pub. L 99-185,
December 17, 1985, 99 Stat 1177 has decreed its intention that all Americans can no longer be forced into
an obligor/grantor status in relation to said Federal Reserve Bank Notes.

G. The Constitution for the united States of America, 1787, Article I, Section 4, Clause 2 (1856) states that
Congress shall assemble at least once in every year, which shall be the first Monday of December,
Notwithstanding, Amendment XX, Section 2 (1933) states: "The Congress shall assemble at least once in
every year, and that such meeting shall begin at noon on the third day of January, unless they by law appoint
a different day."

14. The Constitution cannot be in conflict with itself. The de jure legislature of the united States of America identified
as "Congress" in the aforementioned Article I, Section 4, Clause 2 (1856) adjourned "sine die" in 1861. Evidence
of its reconvening in the absence of a congressional quorum has not been exhibited by the United States. The
national legislative body discernible in Amendment XX, Section 2 first appeared in 1863 by executive resolution
as a department of the Executive Branch of government pursuant to "Emergency War Powers." This de facto
"Congress" was conceived and continues to sit at the pleasure of the president of the corporate ens legis
UNITED STATES.

15. The de jure private Moors who, by their inherent character in rerum natura, are foreign to and wholly without the
corporate ens legis United States are not subject to the actions, acts and whims of the ens legis Congress of the
corporate UNITED STATES. Accordingly, living Men in rerum natura are not subject to the Federal Reserve
Bank Act of December 23, ·1913 which wants for force and effect of law in the Original Jurisdiction.

16. Disclosure of the facts and frauds stated herein has been denied to Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown)
in his rightful capacity as beneficiary of the Original Jurisdiction by an extraordinary and persistent policy of
covin, conspiracy, and collusion constructed and condoned by the UNITED STATES Congress, Amendment XX,
the Federal Reserve Bank/System, and contractors, agents, assigns, successors, heirs, representatives, obligors
and grantors thereof.

17. It is well settled in law that "no right, ratification or other means, can arise out of fraud."

18. By this PUBLIC NOTICE, DECLARATIONS AND LAWFUL PROTEST, the following addendum is attached by
reference herein in its entirety to any and all Federal Reserve Notes, public policy instruments, and documents
regardless of kind arising from or relating to the Federal Reserve Bank/System which are held, received or used
by Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) now and in perpetuity:

"The use of this instrument/conveyance by Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) is of necessity only and
Under Lawful Protest, nunc pro tunc to December 23, 1913, in the absence of a reasonable alternative."

19. The labor of Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) is measured and valued quantum merit
exclusively, in gold and silver coin. As the value of such labor is tangible, it cannot be measured by any
instrument which serves as evidence of debt, notwithstanding that the operational currency of the corporate
UNITED STATES consists exclusively of instruments noted thereon to be evidence of liability.

Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] Page |4
 Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem

20. Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) hereby expressly states his intention to pay, extinguish and satisfy
all of His obligations and make all parties whole. Accordingly, Menes Ankh-El specifically disavows the use of
"discharge" as a fraudulent transaction which implies payment but serves to covertly transfer the debts of Menes
Ankh-El to other parties contrary to Menes Ankh-El‟s held beliefs.

21. Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) is not now and has never been a United States Citizen under the
Fourteenth Amendment of the ens legis Constitution for the corporate UNITED STATES, notwithstanding any
failures to properly pass the said amendment into law.

22. Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) has the absolute unalienable Divine right to keep and bear arms of
any kind for protection of Self, family, and neighbors, by His own will and this DECLARATION.

23. Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) has the absolute unalienable Divine right to move and travel upon
all public roadways in America, of whatever kind and nature, in whatever mode, carriage or conveyance of
transportation He may choose, without license or permission or any other infringement of that right, by His own
will and this DECLARATION.

24. In addition to all of the above, Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) retains all of the Rights as
enumerated and protected by the constitutions, bills of rights, and ordinance pursuant to the Original Jurisdiction.

LAWFUL PROTEST
25. As it is a crime to conceal a crime and a fraud to conceal a fraud, Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L.
Brown) makes Lawful Protest against, abjures, denounces, refuses, takes exception and does not assent
to:

26. The formation of any institutional, bifurcated, public, cestui que trust in violation of the copyright of Menes Ankh-
El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) previously declared herein.

27. Any allegation or presumption that Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) has consented expressly or
tacitly to being a Citizen pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment of the ens legis Constitution of the UNITED
STATES.

28. Any pledge, mortgage, lien or encumbrance by the Council of State Governors, March 6, 1933 which would
identify Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) as a security, surety, co-surety or collateral for any part or
portion of the public debt which has been hypothecated by the use of counterfeited Federal Reserve securities.

29. The forced involuntary use of U.S. funds such as Federal Reserve Bank/System notes, commercial liability
instruments and electronic liability transactions as part of a scheme to compel the principals to impart artificial
commodity value to the liability evidenced thereon, on the authority of MacLeod v. Hoover, (June 22. 1925) No.
26395, S. Ct. Louisiana; 105 S. Rep. 305, that court citing U.S. Bank v. Bank of Georgia. 23 U.S. 333, 10
W heat, 333, 6 L. Ed. 34.

Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] Page |5
 Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem
30. Any presumption that Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) has volunteered to be a debtor in
possession of Federal Reserve Notes with expectation of a quid pro quo; a guarantor/surety/co-surety on the lien
created by the Federal Reserve Bank Act of December 23, 1913; a party to any confidence game, scheme,
forced cestui que use whereby paper wanting inherent value is placed into circulation by the Federal Reserve
Banks in lieu of Constitutionally required gold or silver; a party to the failure of public officials and Federal
Reserve principles to provide full disclosure of the liabilities and perils of using private scrip, instruments of debt,
corporate U.S. obligations, and Federal Reserve Notes as inauthentic replacements for lawful money.

31. Any presumption that Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) has at any time expressed or implied a
promise to guarantee the debt hypothecated by the said Federal Reserve Act, the private debt of the corporate
UNITED STATES, or any obligations of the Federal Reserve Banks, agents, contractors, assigns, successors,
heirs and grantors thereof, now and in perpetuity.

32. Any presumption that Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) has at any time volunteered expressly or
tacitly to join as a co-conspirator in any fraud, conspiracy, covin, collusion, confederation or joint business
Venture operated by the de facto STATE OF INDIANA and the corporate ens legis UNITED STATES as a
surety, co-surety, guarantor or other obligor.

33. Any attempt to induce Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) to act as a tort feasor to the Constitution for
the united States of America, anno Domini 1787, where at Article I, Section 10, it states "No state shall ...emit
bills of credit; make anything but Gold and Silver Coin a tender in payment of debts," all such offers being
refused for fraud.

34. Pursuant to the Original Grant of Depositum for Bailment via the 1789 Constitution of Indiana, Menes Ankh-El
(ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) makes Lawful Protest against, abjures, denounces, refuses, takes. exception and
does not assent to the calculated use of legal fictions to undermine and convert the political Will of the People on
the free soil of the organic country known as Indiana into a legislative democracy that transforms the free People
into subjects of the municipal law of foreigners within the geographical exterior boundary of Indiana and contrary
to the Northwest Ordinance and the original Grant of the People, September 17, 1787, anno Domini, as
amended 1791, anno Domini.

DEMANDS
35. DEMAND IS HEREBY EXPRESSLY MADE TO IMMEDIATELY:

36. RETURN THE DEPOITUM FOR BAILMENT to Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) in His capacity as
descendent by blood of the original Bailor/Grantor/Settlor and His endowment to warrant same by the Universe,
pursuant to the terms, conditions, stipulations, exceptions and reservations contained within the Original Grant.

37. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, RECOGNITION AND RETURN BY THE BAILEE OF THE SAID DEPOSITUM OF
BAILMENT to Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) as repository trustee for the Original public Trust.

38. EXHIBIT THE AUTHORITY whereby Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) can be compelled, forced or
enticed to falsely act as a tort feasor to Article 1, Section 10, Clause I of the Original Grant against his will by

Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] Page |6
 Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem
using the aforementioned fictional bank notes within a scheme of discharge disguised as payment. Failure to so
exhibit within thirty (30) days of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises stipulation that no such authority exists.

39. EXHIBIT THE AUTHORITY whereby Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) can be compelled forced or
enticed to falsely present himself as a United States Citizen/person in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment
prohibition against slavery and involuntary servitude. Failure to do so exhibit within thirty (30) days of PUBLIC
NOTICE comprises stipulation that no such authority exists.

40. ADMIT OR DENY that all actions of the UNITED STATES, the STATE OF INDIANA and all political subdivisions
thereof whether judicial, administrative, municipal, county or otherwise are by their nature actions indebitatus
assumpsit. Failure to respond within thirty (30) days of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises admission of an ongoing
Fraud against the beneficiaries of the Original Jurisdiction.

"Suits as well as transfers may be the protective coverings of fraud," Steelman v. All Continent Corp., 301 US 278, 81 L. Ed
1085: Shapiro v. Wilgus, 287 U.S. 348, 355, 53 S. Ct. 142, 144,85 AL.R. 128. "The fact that the means employed to effect the
Fraudulent conveyance was the judgment of a court and not a voluntary transfer does not remove the taint of illegality." First
National Bank v. Flershem. 290 US 504, 78 L. Ed, 465. “...it is obvious that the fraud did not occur in open court nor in that
sense enter into the decrees under attack, hence the fraud of which we complain was not susceptible to insulation. In the
language of Shapiro v. Wilgus, 287 US 348, 77 L. Ed 355. It was part and parcel to a scheme whereby the form of a judicial
remedy was to supply a protective cover for a fraudulent design." Also, Steelman, supra Flersham, supra, Braun, supra.,
"'That in the absence of an adversary trial or decision the distinction between extrinsic and intrinsic fraud becomes immaterial
and made clear by the following from Throckmorton opinion,"98 US 61. 65. Braun, supra.

41. EXHIBIT VERIFIED EVIDENCE proving the time, place and nature of full disclosure of the benefits, risks and
perils by which Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) could knowingly volunteer to submit to the Federal
Reserve Bank Act of 1913. Failure to so exhibit within thirty (30) days of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises stipulation
that no such disclosure was made.

42. ADMIT OR DENY that Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) did in fact knowingly and voluntarily ratify
the cestui que trust created by the UNITED STATES through the Federal Reserve Bank Act of 1913 which
resulted in the use of grammatical derivations of Menes Ankh-El’s nomen in a scheme of intentional misnomer
for profit and gain. Failure to respond within thirty (30) days of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises denial that the cestui
que trust created by the UNITED STATES through the Federal Reserve Bank Act of 1913 was ever duly ratified
by Menes Ankh-El and any assumption of such ratification is false.

43. EXHIBIT VERIFIED EVIDENCE proving the knowledgeable and voluntary ratification and acceptance by Menes
Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) of the aforesaid cestui que trust. Failure to so exhibit within thirty (30) days
of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises stipulation that the said cestui que trust was never ratified by Menes Ankh-El
and any assumption of such ratification is false.

44. EXHIBIT VERIFIED EVIDENCE proving the granting of a copyright license by Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell
L. Brown) expressly conveying to the licensee the authority to use the grammatical derivations of the proper
name belonging to Menes Ankh-El in a scheme of intentional misnomer for profit and gain through an
unauthorized cestui que trust. Failure to respond within thirty (30) days of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises stipulation
that all such misnomers and uses of the aforesaid cestui que trust comprise intentional copyright infringement.

Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] Page |7
 Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem
45. I, Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown), do hereby deny having received disclosure of the existence,
benefits, risks and perils of a cestui que trust named derivatively at any time, or having been asked to ratify the
said trust. Consequently, I do hereby deny, denounce, adjure and disavow having ever ratified any such trust.

CAVEAT----LAW
46. All public officials, Officers of government bodies politic, in all branches/departments, Executive, Legislative, or
Judicial, being of Oath of Office, bonded to fidelity, are under ministerial duty, Supervisors v. United States ex
reI. 71 U.S. 435,4 Wall 435, U.S. v. Thomas, 15 Wall 337, U.S. v Lee, 106, US 196, 1 S. Ct 240,
fiduciary/trustees, U.S. v Carter, 217 US 286, 30 S. Ct 515, "The implication of a trust is the implication of every
duty proper to a trust ... Whoever is a fiduciary or in conscience chargeable as a fiduciary is expected to live up
to them." Buffum v. Peter Barceloux Co. 289 US 227, 237: 77 L. 'Ed 1140, 1146, cited Braun v. Hamen, 103 P
2d 685 (1939), wherein it further states "Being fiduciaries, the ordinary rules of evidence are reversed", must
obey the law, Butz v. Economou, (US) 98 S Ct. 2895, Davis v Passman (1979, US) 442 US 226, 99 S. Ct. 2264.

47. "The law will protect an individual who, in the prosecution of a right does everything which the law requires him
to do but fails to obtain his right by the misconduct or neglect of a public officer," Lyle v. Arkansas, 9 Howe 314,
13 L. Ed 153, Duluth & Iron Range Co. v Roy, 173 US 587, 19 S. Ct549, 43 L. Ed 820. "It is a maxim of the law,
admitting few if any exceptions, that every duty laid upon a public officer for the benefit of a private person, is
enforceable by judicial process". Butterworth v U.S. ex reI. Hoe, 112 US 50, 55. Ct. 25, 28 L. Ed 656.

48. "A ministerial officer is liable for an injury done, where his acts are clearly against the law." Tracy v. Swartwout,
JO Pet. 80, 9 L. Ed 354. "The judicially fashioned doctrine of official immunity of judicial, legislative or executive
orders does not reach so far as to immunize criminal conduct prescribed by an Act of Congress." O'Shea·v.
Littleton, 414 US 488, 94 S. Ct. 669, "in equity. there are certain rules prohibiting parties bearing such relations
enter into contracts with each other, courts of equity presume them to be fraudulent, and convert fraudulent party
into a trustee." Perry on Trusts (7th Ed) Sec. 194, in Braun v Hansen (1939) 103 F 2d 685, Under the doctrines
of res gestue, res ipsa loquitur, respondeat superior, as now having prior knowledge, authority, power,
opportunity to prevent or aid in preventing injury, damage having been or about to be committed. Title 42 U.S.C.
Section 1986, as applies to public officials, Officers, by the existence of an agreement between two or more
persons, acting in a private conspiracy, through said conspiracy, to impede or hinder, obstruct or defeat the due
course of justice in a State or Territory. with the purposeful intent to deny the equal protection of the law, under
color of State law or authority, or other, Griffin v. Breckenridge (197 I) 403 US 88, 91 S Ct. 1790, depriving of
having or exercising a Right, Federal Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice Act (Title 42 USCS Section 1985(2),
deprivation of due process, even by federal officials, Williams v. Wright (1976).

49. From Perry on Trusts, (7th ed), Sec. 851 " ... in order that the release, confirmation, waiver, or acquiescence
may have any effect .... The cestui que trust·must also know the Law, and what his rights are, and how they
would be dealt with by the court." The Supreme Court of Arizona in Garrett v Reid Cashion Land, 34 Ariz 245,
270 P. 3044 at page 1052 quotes thus from Adair v Brimmer, 74 NY 539 "Confirmation and ratification imply to
legal minds, knowledge of a defect in the act to be confirmed, and the right to reject or ratify it. The cestui que
trust must therefore not only have been acquainted with the facts, but appraised by the law, of how these facts
would be dealt with by a court of equity. All that is implied in the act of ratification, when set up in equity by a
trustee against his cestui que trust, must be proved, and will not be assumed. The maxim 'ignorantis legis
excusat neminem' cannot be invoked in such a case. The cestui que trust must be shown to have been apprised
of his
Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] Page |8
 Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem
legal rights." (Emphasis added.) Also from Ungrich v Ungrich 115 NYS 413, 417, "The rule (is) that to fasten
ratification upon a cestui que trust he must not only have been acquainted with all the facts, but apprised also in
the law, and how such facts would be dealt with by a court of equity." Likewise, Thaw v Thaw, 27 Fed 2d 729,
US v Carter, 217 US 286, 54 L Ed 769, Wendt v Fisher (Cardozo, J.) 234 NY 439, 154 N.E. 303, Leach v Leach,
65 Wis. 284, 26 NW 754.

50. The delay in discovery of the Frauds stated herein pursuant to Amendment XX provides no defense to the
remedy, laches or otherwise. Michaud v Girod, 4 How 503, @ 561, II LEd 1076, Pomeroy's Equity, Sec. 847,
Wiget v Rockwood 69 F @d326,etseq., and from Texas & Pacific Ry, v Pottorff, 291 US 245, 78 L Ed 777, in
Braun, supra, "the doctrine is thus affirmed. It is the settled doctrine of this court that no rights arise on an ultra
vires contract, even though the contract has been performed; and this conclusion cannot be circumvented by
erecting and estoppel which would prevent challenging the legality of a power exercised." And from US v
Grossmayer, 9 Wall 72, 19 L Ed 6 27, "A transaction originally unlawful cannot be made any better by being
ratified." And, further, following Braun, supra, "It is held axiomatic that no right, by ratification or other means,
can arise out of a fraud," 13 C.J. 492, Sec. 440, 6 R.C. L. p 698, the following is quoted in Thompson on
Corporations, 3'" Ed Sec. 2828, from Central Transportation Co. v Pullman Palace Car Co., 139 US 24, as
established doctrine of the Supreme Court, "No performance of either side can give the lawful contract any
validity, or be the foundation of any right of action upon it." As said long ago by the great Justice Story in Prevost
v Gratz, 6 Wheat 481,497; 5 L Ed 311, 315. "It is currently true that length of time is no bar to a trust clearly
established; and in a case where fraud is imputed and proved, length of time ought not, upon principles of
eternal justice, to be admitted to repel relief, On the contrary, it would seem that the length of time during which
the fraud has been successfully concealed and practiced, is rather an aggravation of the offense, and calls more
loudly upon a court of equity to grant ample and decisive relief," (Emphasis added.)

51. It is a maxim of law that peonage and involuntary servitude are forbidden, and immunity is denied to any party,
real or imagined, person or public official who would or conspire to traffic in slaves or participate in aiding or
abetting, Clyatt v US, 197 US 207 (1905), Plessy v Ferguson, 163 US 537, 542, "Whoever [Title 18 U.S.C. See
1581] holds or returns any person to a condition of peonage, or arrests any person with the intent of placing him
in or returning him to a condition of peonage, shall be fined not more than $5,000.00 or imprisoned not more
than five years."

52. All public officials in receipt of this notice are required by their Oath of Office to answer, Notification of legal
responsibility is "the first essential of due process of law" Connally v General Construction Co, 269 U.S. 385,
391. "Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left
unanswered would be intentionally misleading." U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d. 297. It is the ministerial fiduciary/trustee
duty of each and every government official, officer, agent, contractor and assign of tile UNITED STATES, THE
STATE OF INDIANA, the Federal Reserve Bank/System, the International Monetary Fund, the International
Finance Corporation, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Inter-American
Development Bank, the World Bank, the Commission of the European Communities, the Organization for
Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations and any and all other obligors/grantors who view
this notice ("Respondents") to timely and fully answer, Federal Crop Insurance v Merrill (1947) 332 US 380., 92 L
Ed 10,68 S Ct I, 175 ALR 1075.

53. The period for Respondents to respond to this notice is thirty (30) days. Any party or public official wishing
to answer, respond, refute, rebut, deny, object or protest any statement, term, declaration, denial or provision in

Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] Page |9
 Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem
this presentment must do so by Lawful Protest within thirty (30) days of the date of issuance or forever lose all
rights, titles, interests, and the opportunity to plead. All such responses must be verified and have exhibitions and
factual evidence in support of annexed thereto.

54. Respondents may agree with all statements, terms, declarations, denials, and provisions herein by remaining
silent. Failure to timely respond to all such terms and provisions with which Respondents disagree comprises
Respondents' stipulation and confession jointly and severally to acceptance of all statements, terms,
declarations, denials and provisions herein as facts, the whole truth, correct and fully binding on all parties.

55. This document serves as Notice of Fault in the event Respondents fail to timely respond.

56. Notice of Default shall be issued no sooner than three (3) days after Notice of Fault. Default is final three (3)
days after Notice of Fault is issued. Default comprises Respondents consent jointly and severally to be named as
defendants(s) in various actions, administrative and judicial.

57. Upon Default, all matters are settled res judicata and stare decisis.

58. Default comprises an estoppel of all actions, administrative and judicial, by Respondents against the Princeps:
Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown), 3J, Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence Section 805, p. 192,
Restatement 2d of Torts Section 894 (I) (1979), and now reasonably relied on, Wilbur National Bank v US 294
US 120, 124-125 (1935), due to misconduct by Government agents Heckler v Community Health Services, 467
US 51, at 59, 60, Federal Crop ins., supra. "It [the doctrine of Estoppel by Silence) arises where a person is
under duty to another to speak or failure to speak is inconsistent with honest dealings." In Re McArdles Estate,
140 Misc. 257, et seq., and Silence, to work estoppel, must amount to bad faith, Wise v USDC Ky., 38 F Supp
13'0, 134, where duty and opportunity to speak, Codd v Westchester Fire Ins. Co. 14 Wash. 2d 600,128 P 2d
600,128 P 2d 968,151 ALR 316, creating ignorance of facts, Cushing v US Mas s. 18 F Supp 83, inducing
person claiming estoppel to alter his position, Braunch v. Freking, 219 Iowa 556, 258 NW 892, knowledge of
facts and of rights by person estopped, Harvey v Richard, 200 La. 97, 7 So. 2d 674, willful! or culpable silence,
Lenconi v Fidelity Trust & Savings Bank of Fresno, 96 Cal. App. 490, 273 P. 103 et seq., “Silence" implies
knowledge, and an opportunity to act upon it, Pence v Langdon, 99 US 78@ 581, et seq.

DECLARATION OF FREEHOLD HOMESTEAD

Between UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION (de facto Trustee), Noble Drew Ali (Trustor) and Menes
Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) (Heir Beneficiary/Aboriginal Indigenous National Moor/jus in re(m)/ lpso Jure
Moorish National/Heir/Moabite) Land and Resources At Parcel #8005039 PT S1/2 SE1/4 S16 T16 R3 BEG
1266.6FT W & NRLY72.18FT E136.14FT NW IRR 423.5FT NERLY 183.15 FT SE34FT SW 300.69FT TO BEG
2.422AC AND Parcel # 8049642 PT SE1/4 S16 T16 R3 BEG 1216.6FT W & 78.03FTN OF SE COR CURVE NE
206.16FT NE 130FT NW429.48FT IRR SW 146.71FT SE 340 CURVE SW 258.47FT IRR NE 51.87FT TO BEG
th
1.518AC [Property Locations: W 39 St. INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46228] Northwest Amexem.

This transfer agreement is a transfer instrument from THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL, to the
RIGHTFUL HEIR APPARENT, Aboriginal and Indigenous Natural Person of the Land - not taxed, the princeps:
Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown), In Propia Persona, Sui Heredes.

Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] P a g e | 10
 Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem
In the matter of 'Rights of Parties' and, 'Rights of Property', this instrument obtains justice for the Natural Divine
Being Manifest in Human Flesh, Ipso Jure Moorish National, the princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L.
Brown), and intends to remedy these wrongs by addressing Personum Jurisdiction, which is jurisdiction over the
person. Operating and navigating in a colorable status is dishonorable and injurious to the Natural Divine Being
Manifest In Human Flesh.

This agreement between THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the king: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L.
Brown) is forever cured as princeps: Menes Ankh-El is not a minor; not a ward of the state; and is competent from
this day forth to take his seat amongst the affairs of Men and handle the affairs of his Nation – the Moors of
Northwest Amexem – Northwest Africa – North America – North Gate.

This transfer invokes his unalienable /inalienable secured rights and authority as a lord bailiff , Moor and AI
Maurikanos Estados National and beneficiary:

1. Our Authority Copy Book 5-21, FILE #5-39, Record Group 147 (National Archives), “Social Security
Administration Form 7003.”
2. United States Supreme Court: Supreme Law – Acts of State
3. United States Republic Constitution: Article III (3), Section two (2), Amendment V (5) (Liberty clause) and
Amendment IX (9) (Reservation of the Rights of the People).
4. Universal Declaration of Human Rights – United Nations – Human Rights [Article Fifteen (15)J . .
5. Rights of Indigenous Peoples – UN: General Assembly – Part 1, Article 4.
6. Treaty of Marrakesh[Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1786/1836
7. The Declaration of the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and People United Nations General
Assembly #1514
8. The American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man‟ (Adopted by the Ninth International Conference
of American States Bogota, Columbia, 1948 at Article 5, Article 17, Article 26.)
9. Declaration on the Principles of International Law
10. United States Classified Code: Title 22. Foreign Relations And Intercourse, Page 954, Chapter 2: Consular
Courts, General Jurisdiction; Sections 141-143.
11. Divine Instructions CHAPTER XLVII of The Holy Koran of The Moorish Science Holy Temple of Science
verses 6-11.
12. United States Republic Constitution: Thirteenth Amendment withal twenty sections, specifically complete
th st
implementations of Sections Sixteen and Seventeen of said Amendment(38 Congress, 1 Session),
Published Saturday April 9, 1864 The Congressional Globe, New Series No. 94, by John C. Rives,
Washington, D.C.
13. Resolution Number Seventy-Five (75): Dated Apdll7, 1933 A.D. (Moorish-American Society of Philadelphia
and The Use of Their Names)
14. The American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man‟ (Adopted' by the Ninth International
Conference of American States Bogota, Columbia, 1948 at Article 5, Article 17, Article 26.)
15. Executive Order Number: 13107,63, Federal Register, 68,991 (1998) -Implementation of Human Rights
Treaties
16. Declaration on the Principles of International Law
17. The Divine Constitution By-Laws of Moorish America; Acts IV, V and VI
18. Constitution of The State of Illinois, Adopted in Convention at Springfield, September 3,1970.,Ratified by
the People, December 15,1970. In force July I, 1971. Article VII, Section 6.Powers of Home Rule Units

Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] P a g e | 11
 Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem

With this document in place, proper identity for the princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown),
establishes and removes for the record any and all misrepresentation of abandonment by any foreign entities,
guilds, private foreign unions, etc. or persons alleging anything to the contrary, or On his part as an heir to his vast
heritage and responsibility to his people.

This document was prepared by Menes Ankh-El, and I affirm under the penalties for perjury, that I have
taken reasonable care to redact each social security number in this document, unless required by law.

__________________________
Noble Menes Ankh-El, in proper person, sui juris

DISCLAIMER
THE QUOTATION OF THE PRIVATELY COPYRIGHTED STATUTORY LEGISLATIVELY CREATED CASE LAW
AND STATE AND FEDERAL STATUTES PURSUANT TO PL 88-244, DECEMBER 30, 1963, IS DONE
WITHOUT INTENT TO CREATE A "USE", VIOLATE ANY PRIVATE COPYRIGHT, OR GIVE LEGAL ADVICE TO
ANYONE, AND STANDS SO UNLESS LAWFULLY PROTESTED BY ANY CONCERNED PARTY(IES).

59. Notice to principal is notice to all agents. Notice to an agent is notice to all principals. By this Public
Notice, Declarations, and Lawful Protests the world is now informed.

60. This action is bonded by a third party surety holding twenty-one dollars in silver coinage, .999 fine, minted by the
American Treasury, United States of America. pre-1933 issue. The said bond is annexed hereto and
incorporated verbatim herein in its entirety by reference as if fully reproduced herein.

61. The use of a notary public herein is of necessity and under LAWFUL PROTEST without the creating or implying
the existence of any contract or contracts between Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) and
any other parties, legal entities, the UNITED STATES, the STATE OF INDIANA or agents thereof, public or
private.
BE IT SO EXECUTED, and by this execution, be made to appear, in-deed, enacted,

decreed, This the __________ day of the ______________________month, anno Domini, two thousand and
twelve.

L.S.___________________________________
Signed in correct public capacity as Beneficiary

JURAT

Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] P a g e | 12
 Moorish Americans – Northwest Amexem

Menes Ankh-El, in propria persona, sui heredes

c/o P.O. BOX 88045
Marion County, Indiana [46208]

COUNTY OF MARION )
)ss:
STATE OF INDIANA )

Before me, a notary public in and for the said City and territory, personally appeared the above named; the Princeps:
Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) who acknowledged that he did sign the foregoing instrument, Moorish
Deed Of Secondary Conveyance or Incorporeal Hereditaments, and that the same is his free and voluntary act
and deed.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal this _____day of ______________,
2012.

My commission expires______________________

#_______________
Noble Menes Ankh-El c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Indianapolis, Indiana [46208] P a g e | 13