1

To His Most Reverend Eminence

Cardinal Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer, SJ
Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith

And, by competence:

His Most Reverend Eminence

Cardinal Pietro Parolin
Secretary of State of His Holiness

His Most Reverend Eminence

Cardinal Peter Turkson
Chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of the Sciences
and the Pontifical Academy of the Social Sciences

His Most Reverend Excellency

Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia,
President of the Pontifical Academy for Life

18 October 2022

Your Eminence,

Last year, on October 23, 2021, I wrote a letter to the President of the United States
Bishops’ Conference, which was also sent to you, in which I expressed – as I have
already done publicly – my very strong reservations on various extremely
controversial aspects regarding the moral legitimacy of the use of experimental gene
serums produced using mRNA technology. In that letter, which was written with
the help of eminent scientists and virologists, I highlighted the need to update the
Note on the morality of using some anti-Covid-19 vaccines, due to the scientific
 2

evidence that had emerged even then and moreover had been declared by the
pharmaceutical manufacturers themselves.

Permit me, Your Eminence, to renew my appeal in the light of recent

declarations made by Pfizer to the European Parliament and the publication of
official data by the world health agencies.

First of all, I remind you that the document from the Dicastery over which
you preside was promulgated on December 21, 2020, in the absence of complete
data about the nature of the gene serum and its components, and also without any
results from the efficacy and safety trials. The subject of the Note was limited to the
“moral aspects of the use of the vaccines against Covid-19 that have been developed
from cell lines derived from tissues obtained from two fetuses that were not
spontaneously aborted.” The Congregation further reiterated: “We do not intend
to judge the safety and efficacy of these vaccines, although ethically relevant and
necessary, as this evaluation is the responsibility of biomedical researchers and drug
agencies.” Safety and efficacy were thus not the subject of the Note, which in
expressing an opinion about the “moral aspects of the use” did not deem it
appropriate to comment on the “morality of the production” of these drugs.

The safety and efficacy of the individual vaccines should have been
established after a period of experimentation, which normally takes several years. But
in this case the health authorities have decided to carry out the experimentation on
the entire population, departing from the normal practice of the scientific
community, international regulations, and the laws of individual nations. The
results that are now emerging from the official data published in all the countries
that adopted the mass vaccine campaign are incontestably disastrous: it is emerging
that people who have been subjected to inoculation with the experimental serum
not only have never been protected from contagion by the virus, nor from grave
forms of illness, but they have actually been made more vulnerable to Covid-19 and
its variants due to the irreversible compromising of their immune systems caused by
mRNA technology. The data also highlights serious short- and long-term effects,
such as sterility, the inducement of miscarriages in pregnant women, the
transmission of the virus to children through breastfeeding, the development of
serious heart conditions including myocarditis and pericarditis, the return of
cancerous tumors that had previously been cured, and a whole series of other
debilitating diseases. The many cases of sudden deaths – which until recently were
stubbornly considered as having no relation to inoculation with the serum – are
revealing the consequence of repeated doses, even in people who are young, healthy,
and physically fit. Members of the military, who are rigorously controlled by health
personnel for safety reasons, are showing the same incidence of adverse effects after
receiving the serum. Countless studies are now confirming that the serum may cause
 3

forms of acquired immunodeficiency in those who receive it. Worldwide, the

number of deaths and grave pathologies following vaccination is increasing
exponentially. These vaccines have caused more deaths than all other vaccines
combined in the last thirty years. And not only this: in many nations the number of
those who have died after vaccination is significantly higher than the number of
those who died from Covid.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, although not expressing an
opinion on the efficacy and safety of the serums, nevertheless defined them as
“vaccines,” taking for granted that they would give immunity and protect people
against active and passive contagion. But this element has now been disavowed by
the declarations that are coming from all of the world health authorities and the
WHO, who now say that those who are vaccinated may become infected themselves
and infect other people more seriously than people who are not vaccinated, and also
that their immune systems have been drastically reduced if not actually cancelled.
The drugs that have been called “vaccines” thus do not correspond to the official
definition of a vaccine, to which the Note presumably refers. A vaccine is defined as
a preparation which induces the production of protective antibodies by an
organism, conferring a specific resistance against a determined infective illness
(either viral, bacterial, or protozoal). This definition has now been modified by the
WHO, because otherwise it would not have been able to include anti-covid drugs
within the definition of a vaccine, since these drugs do not induce the production of
protective antibodies and do not confer a specific resistance against the infectious
disease caused by SarsCoV-2.

It should be pointed out that the presence of graphene oxide both in the
batches of the “vaccine” as well as in the blood of those who have been inoculated
has now been proven beyond any reasonable doubt, despite the fact that there is no
scientific justification for its presence nor for its pharmaceutical use on human
beings due to its toxicity. The devastating effects of graphene oxide on the organs of
people who have been subjected to inoculation are now evident, and it is likely that
pharmaceutical companies will soon be held accountable. Your Eminence surely
already knows that the use of these technologies with self-assembling graphene oxide
nanostructures has also been patented in order to allow for the tracking and remote
control of subjects, in particular in order to monitor the vital parameters of each
patient in a way that is connected to the cloud via the Bluetooth signal emitted by
these nanostructures. As proof that this information is not the result of the
ruminations of some conspiracy theorists, Your Eminence perhaps knows that the
European Union has chosen as winners of a competition two projects dedicated to
technological innovation: The Human Brain and Graphene. These two projects will
each receive one billion euros in funding over the next ten years.
 4

The “vaccines” against Covid-19 have been presented as the only possible
alternative to a deadly disease. This was false from the very beginning, and with the
perspective of two years it has also been confirmed as false: there were and are
alternative treatments, but they have been methodically boycotted by the
pharmaceutical companies – because they are inexpensive and not profitable for
them – and discredited by scientific publications financed by BigPharma with
articles that were later withdrawn because they were clearly based on falsified data.
Furthermore, Covid-19 has been revealed to be – as was known and as was
scientifically evident – to be a seasonal form of the coronavirus that is treatable and
not deadly, a form of flu that causes only a minimal number of deaths among people
who already have some other underlying condition. The multi-year monitoring of
the coronavirus leaves no doubt in this regard and also eliminates the element of a
“health emergency” that was used as a pretext to impose the vaccines.

The international norms specify that an experimental drug cannot be

authorized for distribution except in the absence of another effective alternative
treatment. This is why drug agencies around the world have prevented the use of
ivermectin, hyperimmune plasma, and other treatments whose effectiveness has
been demonstrated. There is no need to remind Your Eminence that all of these
agencies, along with the WHO, are almost entirely financed by pharmaceutical
companies and foundations linked to them and that there is a grave conflict of
interest at the highest levels. In the past few days the President of the European
Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, had to answer to the Parliament about the
PNRR funding that was obtained for the laboratories in Italy and Greece where her
husband works, without forgetting that the same President refused to provide the
European Court of Auditors with the text messages she exchanged with the CEO of
Pfizer, Albert Bourla, about supply contracts, messages which still have not been
revealed.

The imposition of the experimental serum took place through a coordinated

employment of methods that was unprecedented in recent history, using mass
manipulation techniques that are well known to psychology experts. In this
operation of media terrorism and the violation of the natural rights of individuals,
accompanied by intolerable blackmail and discrimination, the Catholic Hierarchy
chose to take sides with the system, making itself the promoter of “vaccines,” even
reaching the point of recommending them as a “moral duty.” The media skillfully
used the spiritual authority of the Roman Pontiff and his media influence to
confirm the mainstream narrative, and this was an essential element in the success of
the entire vaccination campaign, convincing many of the faithful to undergo
inoculation because of the trust they have placed in the Pope and his global role. The
vaccination obligations imposed on employees of the Holy See, following the lines
of protocols imposed in other nations, have confirmed the Vatican’s absolute
 5

alignment with extremely careless and reckless positions that are completely void of
any scientific validity. This has exposed the Vatican City State to possible liability
on the part of its officials, with a further burden on its treasury; and the possibility
should not be excluded that the faithful may bring collective lawsuits against their
own Pastors, who have been converted into salesmen of dangerous medicines.

After more than two years, the Church has not considered it necessary to
make any statement to correct the Note, which in the light of new scientific evidence
is now outdated and substantially contradicted by the harsh reality of the facts.
Limiting itself strictly to an evaluation of the morality of the use of the vaccines, the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has not taken account of the
proportionality between the benefits of the gene serum – which have been
completely absent – and the short- and long-term adverse side-effects which are now
before everyone’s eyes. Since it is now evident that the drugs sold as vaccines do not
give any significant benefit and on the contrary may cause a very high percentage of
death or serious diseases even in people for whom Covid is not a serious threat, it is
no longer possible to consider valid any attempt to demonstrate a proportionality
between risks and benefits, thus eliminating one of the assumptions on which the
Note was based: “The morality of vaccination depends not only on the duty to
protect one’s own health, but also on the duty to pursue the common good. In the
absence of other means to stop or even prevent the epidemic, the common good may
recommend vaccination, especially to protect the weakest and most exposed” (n. 5).
We know well that there is no “absence of other means,” and that the serum neither
stops nor prevents the epidemic: this makes the mRNA “vaccine” produced with
aborted cell lines not only morally inacceptable but also absolutely dangerous for
one’s health, and in the case of pregnant women also for the health of their children.

The Church, in expressing a moral evaluation of the vaccines, cannot fail to

take into consideration the many elements that contribute to formulating an overall
judgment. The Congregation cannot limit itself to the general theory of the moral
lawfulness of the drug in itself – a lawfulness that is completely questionable given
its ineffectiveness, the absence of tests of its genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, and
the evidence of side-effects. Instead, the Congregation must speak out about this
fact as soon as possible: Now that the complete uselessness of the serums “to stop or
even prevent the epidemic” has been demonstrated, it can no longer be administered,
and indeed there is a moral obligation for health authorities and drug companies to
recall it as something dangerous and harmful, and for the individual faithful to
refuse inoculation.

I further believe, Most Reverend Eminence, that the time has come for the
Holy See to definitively distance itself from those private entities and multinational
corporations that have believed that they can use the authority of the Catholic
 6

Church to endorse the neo-malthusian project of the United Nations’ Agenda2030

and the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset. It not tolerable that the voice of the
Church of Christ continues to be complicit in a plan to reduce the global population
based on the chronic pathologization of humanity and the induction of sterility; and
this is even more necessary in the face of the scandalous conflict of interests to which
the Holy See is exposed by accepting sponsorship and funding from the architects
of these criminal plans.

It will not escape Your Eminence that there are very serious implications for
the Holy Church as a result of her reckless support for the psychopandemic
narrative. Taking advantage of Francis’ words and addresses to lead the faithful to
submit themselves to a serum that has not only proven to be useless but actually
gravely harmful has seriously compromised the authority of the Vatican, prompting
it to propagate a treatment based on data that has proven to be partial and
counterfeited. This reckless and less-than-transparent behavior involved an
interference by the supreme ecclesiastical Authority in a field of strictly scientific
concern which is instead “the responsibility of biomedical researchers and drug
agencies.” After this betrayal, how will faithful Catholics and those who look to the
Church as a sure guide be able to consider the Church’s positions as reliable and
credible with any amount of serenity or confidence? And how will it be possible to
remedy the damage that has been caused to those who, having neither medical
training or competence, have undergone a treatment that has actually compromised
their health or led to premature death, for the sole reason that it was recommended
to them by the Pope, or the Bishop, or their parish priest, who told them that unless
they were vaccinated they could not come to church, serve Mass, or sing in the choir?

The Catholic Hierarchy has experienced a decline in recent years that is

directly proportional to the support it has given to the globalist ideology: its
commitment to support the vaccine campaign is not an isolated case, judging by the
participation of the Holy See in climate initiatives – which are also based on false
assumptions that have nothing scientific about them – and trans-humanistic
endeavors. But this is not the purpose for which Our Lord placed the Church on
earth: She must first and foremost proclaim the Truth, keeping herself far away from
dangerous involvements with the powerful of the earth, and even more so with those
among them who are notoriously hostile to the teaching of Christ and Catholic
morality. If the Hierarchy does not shake itself away from this obsequious
enslavement, if it does not rediscover the courage and dignity to stand up against the
mentality of the world, it will be overhwhelmed and will fall victim to its own
inability to be a stumbling block and a sign of contradiction.

I am certain, Your Eminence, that you will want to consider the particular
gravity of these themes, as well as the urgency of an enlightened intervention that is
 7

faithful to the teaching of the Gospel and the salus animarum which is and remains
the suprema lex of the Church.

In Christo Rege,

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America