(4a) Motion To Challenge Custody Rights

1 Your name
2 Your address
[City, ST ZIP Code]
3
5 [COURT NAME]
6
7
[PLAINTIFF'S NAME], Case No.: [Number]
8
Plaintiff,
9
NOTICE OF MOTION
10 vs.
DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL WITH
11 PREJUDICE BASED UPON THE
[DEFENDANT'S NAME],
ADJUDICATED FACT SUPREME
12
Defendant COURT ADJUDICATED FACT
13 TROXEL V GRANVILLE 530 US 57
(2000) THIS COURT DOES NOT
14
HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO
15 DENY A FATHER OF HIS
16
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO
CARE, CUSTODY AND CONTROL
17 OF HIS OFFSPRING AND MUST
18 ENSURE 50/50 CUSTODY RIGHTS
TO THE DEFENDANT/FATHER
19
20
21
NOTICE OF MOTION
22
DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BASED UPON THE
23
24 ADJUDICATED FACT SUPREME COURT ADJUDICATED FACT

1
25
NOTICE OF MOTION DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BASED UPON THE
ADJUDICATED FACT SUPREME COURT ADJUDICATED FACT TROXEL V GRANVILLE 530 US 57
26
(2000) THIS COURT DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DENY A FATHER OF HIS
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO CARE, CUSTODY AND CONTROL OF HIS OFFSPRING AND MUST
ENSURE 50/50 CUSTODY RIGHTS TO THE DEFENDANT/FATHER -
1 TROXEL V GRANVILLE 530 US 57 (2000) THIS COURT DOES NOT
2
HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DENY A FATHER OF HIS
3
4 FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO CARE, CUSTODY AND CONTROL OF HIS
5 OFFSPRING AND MUST ENSURE 50/50 CUSTODY RIGHTS TO THE

6
DEFENDANT/FATHER
7
9 Comes now, the defendant/Father [Type in your name and address

10
and then delete brackets] is a private living Man with blood flowing through his
11
12 body and he is presenting a written notice of motion notifying the public state
13
administrative court that it is sanctioned and limited by a written state constitution
14
15
against private people living in the private side of law and do not wish to get
16 assistance from the public side of law, which is benefits from the State or Federal
17
government.
18
19 Take notice, this public state administrative court is sanctioned and

20
limited by the Supreme Court adjudicated fact Troxel v. Granville, 530 US 57
21
22
20001 and thereby this state administrative court is sanctioned from entering an
23 1
"[T] he interest of parents in the care, custody, and control of their children—is perhaps the
oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by [the Supreme Court.]" Keates v. Koile, 883 F.3d 1228,
24
1235-36 (9th Cir. 2018) (quoting Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65 (2000) (plurality opinion)).
2
25
26
1 order that causes interference with parents' fundamental liberty interest in the care,
2
custody, and management of their children. challenging the court and thereby the
3
4 state administrative court is prohibited under due process of law to rely upon any
5
presumptions.
6
7
Take notice it is a fact the defendant/Father [Type in your name and
8
9 address and then delete brackets] is a living Man with blood flowing through his
10
body and is a private of the state,2 that in the ordinary sense of the Constitution, is
11
a political community of free private citizens, occupying a territory of defined
12
13 boundaries, and organized under a government sanctioned and limited by a written

14
constitution, and established by the consent of the governed. and is filing a Motion
15
16 to Challenge the jurisdiction of the Court to deny the defendant/father the care,
17
custody, and control of his offspring.
18
19
STATEMENT OF FACTS
20
21
22 2
“In the Constitution the term state most frequently expresses the combined idea just noticed, of
23 people, territory, and government. A state, in the ordinary sense of the Constitution, is a political community of free
citizens, occupying a territory of defined boundaries, and organized under a government sanctioned and limited
by a written constitution, and established by the consent of the governed.” Texas v. White, 74 US 700 - Supreme
24
Court 1869
3
25
26
1 1. Take notice the offspring are equally the property of the Defendant/Father
2
and the natural mother and therefore the father must have 50/50 custody and
3
4 property rights cannot be deprived unless by due process.

5
2. Take notice it may not sound natural to refer to offspring as property, but it
6
7
is a fact the offspring are the property of the father and the mother and
8 thereby they must share 50/50 custody and this right to property cannot be
9
deprived unless by due process of law requiring a judgment by peers.
10
11 3. Take notice the defendant is a man and private citizen living within the
12
boundaries of this state and hereby this administrative state court must
13
acknowledge that the defendant/father is not a “person”3 defined under 42
14
15 U.S. Code § 653 Federal Parent Locator Service definition of “person4”

16
means an individual, a trust or estate, a partnership, or a corporation.
17
18
4. Take notice the undersigned Defendant/Father’s inalienable rights are
19
20 secured by a written constitution [Type in your state constitution] that

21
requires the court to inform the Defendant/Father of his rights secured by
22 3
“Person” Defined by 42 USC Section 1301(a)(3) The term “person” means an individual, a
23 trust or estate, a partnership, or a corporation.
4
“person” means an individual, a trust or estate, a partnership, or a corporation. Defined by 42
USC Section 653
24
4
25
26
1 state constitution and explain the legal consequences of the
2
Defendant/Father waiving his constitutional rights.
3
4
5. Take notice the Defendant/Father requires the court to provide proof of a
5
6 document proving the undersigned Defendant/Father knowingly expressed

7
his consent to waive rights secured by state constitution and federal
8
9 constitution allowing the court to assign custody rights and visitation rights
10
without due process in accordance with state constitution and 5th and 14th
11
amendments, because this is the only lawful way the court can assign
12
13 custody and visitation rights against the Defendant/Father’s wishes.

14
15 6. Take notice it is the duty of the court to be watchful for the constitutional
16
rights of the private citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon
17
18 and must provide equal protection of law and ensure the Defendant/Father’s
19
due process rights against the deprivation of life, liberty, and property is
20
21
maintained.
22
23
24
5
25
26
1 7. Take notice it is a fact persons not judges (Judge Surrogates) are coram non
2
judice,5 and thereby they are without judicial authority and cannot yield a
3
4 lawful judgment consistent with due process causing the deprivation of life,
5
liberty, or property.
6
7
RELIEF IS REQUIRED BY STATE ADMINISTRATIVE
8
9 COURT TO BE WATCHFUL TO PROTECT THE INALIENABLE

10
RIGHTS OF PRIVATE CITIZENS LIVING IN THE PRIVATE
11
1. Relief is required by this state administrative court for it is an adjudicated
12
13 fact6 courts are to be watchful against any stealthy encroachments thereon

14
and therefore must ensure the Movant/Defendant/Father retains his
15
16 constitutional right to 50/50 custody of his offspring.
17
2. Relief is required by this state administrative court to prevent any public
18
state agency or state administrative court from interfering with the private
19
20 rights of the father’s constitutional right to 50/50 custody of his offspring.

21
5
“Traditionally that proposition was embodied in the phrase coram non judice, "before a person
22 not a judge" — meaning, in effect, that the proceeding in question was not a judicial proceeding because lawful
judicial authority was not present, and could therefore not yield a judgment. American courts invalidated, or denied
23 recognition to, judgments that violated this common-law principle long before the Fourteenth Amendment was
adopted” Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Marin, 495 US 604 - Supreme Court 1990
6
“It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any
24
stealthy encroachments thereon” Byars v. United States, 273 U.S. 28 (1927)
6
25
26
1
5
Dated this [day] of [Month], [year].
6
8
Your Name spelled in upper & lower case
9 UCC 1-308 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
7
25
26

(4a) Motion To Challenge Custody Rights

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

(4a) Motion To Challenge Custody Rights

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 Your name

24 ADJUDICATED FACT SUPREME COURT ADJUDICATED FACT

4 FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO CARE, CUSTODY AND CONTROL OF HIS

5 OFFSPRING AND MUST ENSURE 50/50 CUSTODY RIGHTS TO THE

9 Comes now, the defendant/Father [Type in your name and address

19 Take notice, this public state administrative court is sanctioned and

13 boundaries, and organized under a government sanctioned and limited by a written

4 property rights cannot be deprived unless by due process.

15 U.S. Code § 653 Federal Parent Locator Service definition of “person4”

20 secured by a written constitution [Type in your state constitution] that

6 document proving the undersigned Defendant/Father knowingly expressed

13 custody and visitation rights against the Defendant/Father’s wishes.

9 COURT TO BE WATCHFUL TO PROTECT THE INALIENABLE

13 fact6 courts are to be watchful against any stealthy encroachments thereon

16 constitutional right to 50/50 custody of his offspring.

20 rights of the father’s constitutional right to 50/50 custody of his offspring.

You might also like