Why Jesus Forgot To Explain Trinity (By Inamullah Mumtaz)

“WHY JESUS FORGOT TO EXPLAIN TRINITY?
” Page |1
“WHY JESUS FORGOT TO

EXPLAIN TRINITY?”
Dizzy Spells?
JESUS PBUH SAYS: JOHN 17:3
“AND THIS IS LIFE ETERNAL, THAT THEY MIGHT KNOW THEE

THE ONLY TRUE GOD, AND JESUS CHRIST, WHOM THOU HAS
SENT”
“WHY JESUS FORGOT TO EXPLAIN TRINITY?” Page |2
NOTE: This little booklet is the part of the main book written by Sheikh
Inamullah Mumtaz by the name of “Paulianity”. Rests of the other issues
in Christianity are dealt in his complete book “Paulianity”. This booklet
deals with the subject of “TRINITY” only.
COPYRIGHT:
It is with the greatest pleasure that we give you our permission to
reproduce or translate this book in any language whether for sale or free
distribution, the “PDF” of this book is absolutely free for the readers, but
make sure not a word should be added and taken out from this book
without the permission of Sheikh Inamullah Mumtaz. If anyone tries to do
it to mutilate the book deliberately for the character assassination of the
writer, then he/she must be in a dock for a trial on the Day of Judgment.
No payment of royalties or copyright is required.
WAllah! If we had the means, we would flood the world with our free
literature. It will be appreciated if a few copies of the reproduction can be
posted to us for our records.
DEDICATED
To my parents who have made this possible after Allah for giving
me all kind of help and support so that I can work as full time Da’ee in the
field of Da’wah. May Allah grant them JannahTulFirdous (highest bliss)
and make my efforts their sadqa jaariya (continuous blessings) forever…
Ameen Ya Rabbal Aalameen. And to my humble wife who follows the
Sunnah and the commandments of Allah without showing me the single
line on the forehead. mashaAllah.!
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Sheikh Inamullah Mumtaz was born in Lahore, Pakistan on 28th,
May, 1985. At the age of 23, he started the work of Deen after getting
inspired by Late Sheikh Ahmed Deedat. As being the Founder & the
President of Qur’anic Da’wah Centre International which was established
on 5th, Nov, 2010 in Lahore, Pakistan. It is the duty of this Centre to
elaborate the missionary work for the readers. The purpose of this
Islamic Centre is to educate maximum people (Muslims & non-Muslims)
in the field of Da’wah; we do comparative studies in various fields &
contrasts like “Islam & Christianity”, “Islam & Science”, “Islam &
Secularism”, “Islam & Atheism”, “Islam & Democracy”, Islam &
Communism, Islam & Capitalism, Islam & Fitnah Dajjal etc. Our pivotal
mission is to call people into the house of Islam, the people who do not
know about the Prophet Muhammad PBUH as being the last and final
messenger and warner of Allah Almighty sent out to this world. Islam is
only the non-Christian faith which makes it an article of faith to its
followers to believe in Jesus Christ PBUH, no Muslim is a Muslim if he or
she does not believe in Jesus PBUH, we believe that he is one of the
mightiest messengers of God, we ought to believe that he quickened the
dead by God’s permission, and healed those born-blind and lepers by
God’s permission, the only parting ways are these: we say he is not the
son of god, not the begotten son of god, and he did not die for anybody’s
sins, he was the messenger and servant of Allah as he claimed to be.
Christians are the highest in filling the census forms than anybody else
and on other hand Muslims are the highest in practicing Deen than
anybody else but still Islam is the fastest growing religion on earth. As
Islam came 600 years after Christianity so in other words Islam is
prevailing and superseding all other way of lives. Islam is the only way of
life which is compatible with this world, all other systems are failed to
provide social justice to humanity. The successful socio-politico-
economic system is only mentioned in the Holy Quran in detail. Do pray
for the Founder/President of ‘QDCI’ that may Allah reward and grant him
success in this field and mission of propagation and protect him from all
kinds of commotions (fitnah) and malevolencies. And accept his efforts
on the Day of Judgment. This Islamic Centre will always be the protégé
of late Sheikh Ahmed Deedat & Dr. Israr Ahmed. Hope the efforts of this
center may fall in result of producing more Da’aes in Islam to propagate
the real Deen throughout the world. AMEEN YA RABBAL ALAMEEN!
PREFACE
All praises be to Allah Who has given me this opportunity to write

down the book regarding the trinity false concept in the Holy Bible.
Christians are busy in defaming Islam as being the worst religion on
earth. How hard they try, they will never be able to prove trinity from the
Bible. There is no root word and actual word of trinity to be found in the
Bible. I would like to thank several names after Allah who has changed
my life to do this Da’wah work for Islam. I will always be the protégé of
Late Sheikh Ahmed Deedat R.A and he will be my mentor in the field of
Da’wah Alhamdulillah! Late Sheikh Ahmed Deedat R.A inspired me for
this cause. After that I would like to pray Allah to give highest Jannah to
the people like, Rahmatullah Karainvi (The writer of Izharul Haq, and the
inspirer of Late Sheikh Ahmed Deedat), Imam Razi R.A, Ibn Jarir Al Tabari
R.A, Ibn Taymiyya R.A, Qasim Nanotwi R.A, Ismael Ibn Kathir R.A, Shah
Waliullah R.A, Abdul Aziz of Dahelvi R.A, Ibn Qayyim R.A, Imam Ghazzali
R.A, Muhammad Ameen Safdar Okarvi R.A, Sheikh Saadi R.A, Dr. Israr
Ahmad R.A, Syed Ataullah Shah Bukhari, Sheikh-Ul- Hind Mahmud Al
Hasan etc. Without these polemicists, clerics and proselytizers, I would
not have done this work easily. Their efforts in the field of propagation
towards Christianity and socio-politico-economic system of Islam have
made my task easy. I pray to ALLAH to produce more Da’aes of Islam
under their guidance and give us respite from the Commotions of Ad
Dajjal (Anti-Christ) before his actual physical appearance. (Ameen Sumaa
Ameen)
Brothers and Sisters I would like to tell you the basic principle of
Da’wah in Islam regarding “Christianity” before starting this book. The
message is regarding “How not to do Da’wah!”. If you ever meet a
Christian who seems to be a gentle, an affable not faasiq (perverted), then
use the Holy Quran, but when you meet any faasiq (perverted), do not
open the Holy Quran on him/her even if he/she forces you to do so
because the Holy Quran & Ahadeeth are not their evidences by any
means but we have some connection with the Bible somehow and we
believe in all the Prophets of the Bible too. Nowadays, these Christians
are getting so much desperate towards their own records that they do
not have any answers to any questions raised by Islam for 14xx years.
So, they turned the tables towards The Holy Quran & Ahadith. They will
ask you regarding the exegesis (explanation books written by Muslim
scholars) of the Holy Quran with such arrogance, that they do not even
know what they are talking about, as they just hear from someone and
pose the question without even knowing the Arabic and basic principles
of Islam. Now, they want to confuse the Muslims to catch them on
exegesis’ names. Then they will jump to Ahadeeth to confuse by quoting
all Zaeef (weak), Mu’zou’ (fabricated) and Hukm Mansookh (abrogated/or
to be valid only at the time of Prophet Muhammad PBUH) Ahadeeth to
catch Muslims in a fraud. Especially, the Arab Christians, they try to
caricature the Qura’nic Arabic to show non-Arabic Muslims that their
religion is false. These Arab Christians do not realize that Islam has not
come today, Islam has the greatest history in Arabic language, we have
million Arabic scholars who know the principles of Arabic language of
the Holy Quran not like these Christians who rely their religion on
translations of the Bible. This is an amazing situation; these Christians
are asking Arabic language of the Holy Quran but they do not even know
the words of Greek & Hebrew of their own records. The Ancient Hebrew
and Greek, there are only few counted scholars available today who can
might decipher the language, on the other hand both Ancient Hebrew and
Greek are dead languages and nobody really speaks now. Arabic
language is an international language, half of the world’s population
speak Arabic language even at the time of Prophet Muhammad PBUH no
Arab enemy questioned on the Arabic grammar of the Holy Quran instead
they were being marveled and flabbergasted. My Muslim brothers and
sisters do not get terrified and petrified with their ingenuities. Christianity
came before Islam and the basic instinct shows us that previous must be
analyzed first. If they ask you about the tafaseer (explanation of books
written by exegesis) of the Holy Quran, then similarly you should ask
them about their tafaseer (explanation of books written by exegesis) of
the Bible and believe me by GOD, they will run away because they do not
carry any book which interprets Bible. Every church and denomination
are making their own interpretations according to their inclinations.
Whenever you ask them about the tafaseer (explanation of books written
by exegesis) they are too arrogant to say that “we do our own tafaseer
(explanation) of the Holy Bible through RUHUL QUDUS (HOLY SPIRIT)
which is inside us”, and every “newborn” has this cheap gift. This gift of
“HOLY SPIRIT” is so cheap that the most hilarious Christian can get it in
a flash without any effort and straightjacketing his/her life even with all
the propensities lumped up together. For example, Reverend Jims Jones
got it, Jimmy Swaggart got it, Marvin Gorman got it, Jim Baker got it,
Benito Mussolini got it, King Louis of France got it, Constantine of
Constantinople got it, the soldiers who mass murdered in Sabira and
Shatila got it. Then these missionaries will tell me, “they are not
Christians, they are not following Bible”, I say who is following Bible?
Who are you to judge people by keeping them in Christian faith and
kicking them out? When any Father, Pastor or Bishop caught up in an
immodest act with the prostitute and then got defrocked by their
churches then these Christians would say “he was not a Christian”, very
easy way out isn’t? But with the same Holy Spirit these all holy men were
committing illicit sex, and that Holy Spirit did not stop them once not to
visit brothel house. What I mean to imply is this, that you cannot say
“WHY JESUS FORGOT TO EXPLAIN TRINITY?” P a g e | 10
these were not Christians but what you have to say that these were bad
Christians, in other words Christianity has failed to stop them. The
system which stops you to go into gutter is better system which allows
you to go in and then come back. What fruits did Christianity produce for
20XX years? As Jesus PBUH said “a little leaven, leaveneth the whole, a
little amount of yeast ferments the whole loaf but if the little amount of
yeast does not ferment the loaf, there is something wrong with your yeast
and wrong with your loaf”, in other words if the seeds are good they will
produce good bread or fruit if not then they will produce evil results. But,
poor missionaries with all their power of “Holy Spirit” they could not
make a tafaseer (explanation) to expound the simple question of mine,
WHY DID GOD CURSE CANAAN in GENESIS 9:20? At last, they do not
believe in the Holy Quran and Islam then why would we waste our time
and discuss with them. We Muslims believe in their Bible somehow under
the sake of correction but they have no connection with the Holy Quran
whatsoever.
It is an experienced advice to the Muslim brothers and sisters who
are doing Dawah against Christianity that never debate and argue on the
unfundamentals of Christianity. Nowadays, Christians are becoming
clever as they stopped discussing these topics anymore. They are
interested in other topics like Hadith and Quran, whereas these both
books have nothing to do with them. I always wonder why Christians are
trying to prove Holy Quran is being wrong. Now, we should follow Bible?
They are showing us silver to leave Gold? Good! Christians!!! You have
to prove your fundamentals first to make our hearts changed. If
Christians come to debate on their fundamentals they are doomed
already.
Christians would say "God can do anything", I say no! He cannot
do anything. It is a logical error in human's mind that the Creator of the
heavens and the earth can do anything. I have to say yes; God can do
anything but whatsoever He does those are Godly things not “monkey
tricks”. Is there anyone who can expect His God to be coming down on
earth dancing and drinking? (may Allah forgive me) no!
Similarly, becoming human is a blasphemy to God's Majesty
because human beings do sex, rest, eat, excrete etc.... I challenge to any
sick mind who differs from me and still would say, "Don’t limit God, He
can do anything". Just say ‘yes’ to these questions, can God throw us
out of His kingdom and rule? Can God create another God, who is
uncreated? How can God throw us out of His kingdom whereas
everything belongs to Him? So, stop making Jesus God by justifying
"God can do anything". God can do anything but whatever He does those
are Godly things. God does not do stupid things as we human brain
thinks. God cannot perform immodest acts it is not His Attributes. We
cannot imagine God as Christian thinks that, ‘God is like a man’, or ‘God
became a man’, look at us, we all are just glorified monkeys, gorillas or
baboons and we are making this image to God? As immodesty always
comes from SATAN alone and God is the creator of everything but it does
not mean that I am limiting GOD as Christian would say! Can GOD create
another GOD? Who has no beginning and no ending? How? When?
Where? Can God throw you out of His dominion/kingdom? Where can He
throw you out? Yes, He can finish you up, eradicate you, but He can’t
throw you out from His Own rule and Dominion but it does not mean that
God is limited; I am protecting His Right Majesty by telling Christians
whatever God Does, He does Godly things. Aborigines of Australia were
better than the educated Christians of today who still believe that Jesus
is God/man. They knew the word “ATNATU” which means someone who
doesn’t have his back to excrete and they rejected the white men’s
preaching of Jesus’ divinity. These white men forced and changed these
Aborigines into Pagans over the period of time. As Holy Quran mentioned
that we have sent many Messengers to different places on Earth to
preach oneness of Allah might some Messenger’s or Prophet’s teachings
were remembered by these Aborigines.
THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: 62:5
“The likeness of those who were entrusted with the (obligation of

the) Taurat (Torah) (i.e. to obey its commandments and to practice its
legal laws), but who subsequently failed in those (obligations), is as the
likeness of a donkey who carries huge burdens of books (but
understands nothing from them). How bad is the example (or the
likeness) of people who deny the Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, signs,
revelations, etc.) of Allah. And Allah guides not the people who are
Zalimun (polytheists, wrong-doers, disbelievers, etc.).”
Let me provide the answer before starting the subject as common
allegation on Muslims that they are hypocrites when using the Bible.
Christians would say, “Muslims say, it is not the word of God and
corrupted”, then they use the same book to prove their case. Brothers
and sisters let me tell you; nowhere the Holy Quran ever says that Torah,
Zaboor (Psalms) and Injeel (Gospel) were being disappeared from the
surface of the Earth. What Holy Quran says again and again that the
changings have been made to it over the period of time till the advent of
Prophet Muhammad PBUH. Holy Quran is “Furqan” which means
“Criterion”. All the previous scriptures’ errors are being rectified and
guarded forever under “quality control” till doomsday. Even now you
can see the changings are being made in the Biblical versions.
NOTE: The founder of the idea of Trinity in Christendom was Athanasius

of Alexandria and opponent was Arian (Arianism) and Arius of Alexandria
but unfortunately in 325 AD by the order of Constantine in the council of
Nicaea, Athanasius Creed was superseded by all other creeds. And
politically by the show of hands Jesus was anointed as God. Rests of the
other Creeds were hammered by force and persecuted. That is why after
the birth of Prophet Muhammad PBUH, Rome was a Christian nation
especially Trinitarians.
1. Isaiah 43:10-11
“Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom

I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand
that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there
be after me. 11I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no
saviour.”
(God says very clearly to the people of Isaiah that God will
never come in a new form, neither he had come before. So, it proves
that God Incarnation was a lie and false understanding and savior
will not even come according to the verse. So, Jesus PBUH was not
the savior in the form of God)
2. John 20:17
“Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet

ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them,
I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your
God.”
(Here Jesus PBUH says, “to my God”, if Jesus was God or
part of the trinity then how could he say “my God”. He himself was
bowing down to another “God”? I cannot understand this, ask
these Christians to explain this anomaly).
Christians are getting so much annoyed by the truth of Trinity

doctrine that it cannot be explained to anyone. New sickness they have
adopted by saying our Trinity is not 1+1+1=3 but it is 1x1x1=1. Great logic
right! But poor Mathematics, this mathematical calculation is illogical and
cannot be limited, as you are multiplying by denying the rules of Math. If
you multiply to make 1x1x1=1, then we have limits of 1, it can be 1000
times one to make it one, WHY LIMIT ONLY 3 to make it 1? Why not more
than 3 ONES? Why God only has 3 personalities? It must be billions as if
it does not affect “Oneness”. Hindus are more consistent than Christians
as they believe in “Pantheism”. Your assumption is false (My dear
Christians), have another hope, because 1+1+1=3 and you have 3
different entities. Then they say, in human body we have a soul, spirit and
a flesh but they are one in essence, again they are making another fall,
ask them when we will die where our body goes? It will be buried into the
ground and will be turned into the dust forever. Then our soul will depart
to God so they both are not the same entities as one will be diminished
forever. If they say Jesus PBUH was God “incarnate” so his flesh must
be divine too, ask them where is the foreskin of Jesus PBUH when he
was circumcised? As, those days, barbers used to throw the foreskins
into the garbage or to the dogs. I am not mocking Jesus PBUH, I am
reasoning if Jesus PBUH was “GOD” his flesh must also be divine. Then
they say every family has a Father, Mother and Children to complete the
natural formula of God, but you know if someone does not have a child
then? Same as if one God is missing from the Trinity? They say that
Jesus was “GOD” then if God came down to earth why he forgot to
explain Trinity? When God says “he is not the author of confusion”.
Thousands of people are confused on Trinity, if GOD came down, then
there should be no confusion and mystery left, but poor Jesus PBUH he
didn’t explain trinity once and left the world. Ask them whenever they
think about Father, do they think about Jesus at that time? No! Whenever
they think about Jesus do they think about Father at that time No! Same
applied to Holy Ghost, and these three are distinct separable mental
pictures. Father is like a “Santa Claus” (envisage or figment), Jesus is
like a “Nordic White Man” and Holy Spirit is like a “Dove” at the
Pentecost. How hard you try you can never superimpose these three
pictures to create one, these three will ever remain three unless your
mind is diseased. This is an infinite sickness to prove Trinity to be right
concept of God. Father in the heaven is ONE, Jesus Christ was in two
forms, one was a spiritual form according to Christians before his birth
and 2nd was after his alleged crucifixion blond hairs and blue eyes and at
last the Holy Spirit came as a dove (an animal bird, which can be eaten
as kosher), and another Holy Spirit who is inside million New Born
Christians. So, how many Gods do these Christians have? As Holy Quran
says, we created everything on this earth out of pairs and we have come
to know the truth of this statement that everything is manufactured in
pairs for example; “negative and positive”, “male and female”, “good and
evil” … etc. Where does this nonsensical Trinity fit in? That is why I say,
Christianity is the mixture of Grecians and Hindus. Anthropomorphism +
Pantheism makes Christianity.
HOLY QURAN SAYS IN SURAH YASEEN 36:36
“Glory be to Him, Who has created all the pairs of that which the
earth produces, as well as of their own (human) kind (male and female),
and of that which they know not.”
1 CHORINTHIANS 14:33
BUT GOD IS CONFUSING HIS ENTIRE CREATION IS NOT IT?

GOD IN UNITY?
“And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is,
Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord” (Mark 12:29)
Jesus PBUH quoting verbatim quotation from his brother Moses

PBUH from Deuteronomy 6:3-5 and Moses PBUH was not having any kind
of trinity concept in worshipping God at his time. So, if Jesus PBUH was
quoting verbatim it means he was also having the same concept of Moses
PBUH in worshipping God. If Jesus PBUH was God, then at his time the
first commandment would be “trinity” not any other. But he is quoting his
brother Moses PBUH verbatim. The Hebrew word is used “Ekhad” which
means the One. As, Holy Quran says in Surah Al Ikhlas (114) “Ahad”.
Both are having the same meanings. In the Bible, mostly there are two
words used for oneness of God.
YACHID vs EKHAD
YACHID means “only (adjective)” NO SPACE FOR TRINITY
EKHAD means “one (numerical)” NO SPACE FOR TRINITY

HOW MANY GODS DO CHRISTIANS HAVE?
Which God should we follow? Father in the heaven or Jesus the

baby or mature God or the Holy Spirit like a dove or a spirit? If u say they
all are one? Then we have to worship 3 gods in one? What nonsense is
this? Or separately? Then 3... Let me count how many Gods are coming
out from the Bible...
1. Father
2. Jesus
3. Jesus’ spirit before birth
4. Jesus appeared as a man according to O.T as Melchizedek
5. Dove
6. Holy Spirit
7. God as a man who wrestled Jacob
8. God as a man who came to Abraham and ate meat
Tell me which God to follow?

There is no difference between Hinduism and Christianity. As
Hindus believe the concept of God Incarnate and reincarnation. Shiva,
Vishnu, Brahman etc. at their times. But Christians did better than that,
they say “Jesus was God Incarnate plus the Begotten Son also”. And by
the way the founder of the idea of LOGOS was Philo of Alexandria (Greek)
long before Jesus PBUH which was thumb sucked into the Gospel of
John and was canonized way later than other three Gospels. That is why,
the Gospel of John was the most doubtful and controversial document
among early Christians to be canonized or not.
Proceed to any discussion further; I want to educate my western

readers about the plurality of the Hebrew language as well as Arabic.
Most of the Christians think that Bible claims trinity in the Old Testament
regarding the statements like “Let us make”. They propound that “us” is
the plural so it means, “three in One”. Let me correct them by educating
about the linguistics of the eastern languages. First we have to remind
ourselves that Bible is not a western book it is totally an eastern book full
of Greco-Roman-Jewish culture. So, remove the Greek/Roman glasses
and read the Bible as Jew read it.
Arabic (2 types of plural = plural of numbers & plural of respect)

Hebrew (2 types of plural = plural of numbers & plural of respect)
Aramaic (2 types of plural = plural of numbers & plural of respect)
Hindi (2 types of plural = plural of numbers & plural of respect)
Urdu (2 types of plural = plural of numbers & plural of respect)
English (1 type of plural = plural of numbers only)
So, the word for God used in the Genesis 1:1 is “Elohim” which
means, “Eloh” is the name and “im” is the plural of respect used for the
proper nouns in the Hebrew language not the plural of numbers. That is
why the first verse of the bible is, “In the beginning God created heavens
and the earth”, not “Gods”. Similarly, Holy Quran speaks in the same
tone by showing plurality in respect towards God. So the deficiency is in
the English language then why to blame God?
THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: SURAH AL HIJR (The Rocky Tract)

15:9
“Indeed, it is We (plural of respect) who sent down the Qur'an and

indeed, We (plural of respect) will be its guardian.”
HEBREWS VERSUS TRINITY
The Encyclopedia of Religion Vol. 15 1987 admits: 'Theologians

today are in agreement that the Hebrew Bible does not contain a doctrine
of the Trinity.'
The New Catholic Encyclopedia: 'The doctrine of the Holy Trinity is

not taught in the Old Testament.'
The Encyclopedia of Religion says: 'Theologians agree that the

New Testament also does not contain an explicit doctrine of the Trinity.'
The Encyclopedia Britannica 1976 observes: Neither the word

Trinity nor the explicit doctrine appears in the New Testament.'
Protestant theologian Karl Barth (as quoted in The New

International Dictionary of New Testament Theology 1976) similarly
states: 'The New Testament does not contain the developed doctrine of
the Trinity. The Bible lacks the express declaration the Father, the Son,
and the Holy Spirit are of equal essence.'
The Encyclopedia Britannica mentions that, “the concept of the

Trinity is of Greek origin, with Jewish input and is a strange mixture made
by Christians, because the religious concepts are taken from the Holy
Bible, but they are filled with foreign philosophies.
So, Jesus Christ was the only person in the history who was made
“GOD” by democratically by the show of hands in the council of Nicaea
in 325 AD. That is why we find the double statements in the Gospels
regarding Jesus’ status. The bona fide and the Modus Operandi of Jesus
PBUH was very clear and succinct.
JESUS PBUH SAYS
“No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and
love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye
cannot serve God and mammon.” (Matthew 6:24)
In this verse, Jesus PBUH is denying even two masters, then how
could you serve three Gods at the same time?
"Why callest me good? There is none good but one, that is God"
(Matthew 19:17)
". . .for my Father is greater than I. . ." (John 14:28)
"My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me." (John 7:16)
"O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me:

nevertheless, not as I will, but as thou wilt." (Matthew 26:39)
"My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" (Matthew 27:46)
"But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels
which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father." (Mark 13:32)
"Who has gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God" (Peter
3:22)
“Call no man your father on this earth, there is only one your father
which art in heaven” (Matthew 23:9)
“I can own myself do nothing…” (John 5:20)
“But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels
which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father” (Mark 13:32)
“And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is,
Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord” (Mark 12:29) verbatim
quotation from Moses PBUH in (Deuteronomy 6:4)”
Moses PBUH was not having any kind of trinity concept in

worshipping God, so if Jesus PBUH was quoting verbatim it means he
was also having the same concept of Moses PBUH in worshipping God.
“I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your
God.” (John 20:17)
THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: SURAH AL-ANBIYA (THE PROPHETS)

21:22
“Had there been therein (in the heavens and the earth) gods
besides Allah, then verily both would have been ruined. Glorified be
Allah, the Lord of the Throne, (High is He) above what they attribute to
Him!”
MATTHEW 6:24
“No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and
love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye
cannot serve God and mammon.”
Same as the Holy Quran says, if there were two Gods instead of
one, then there would have been a fight in the creation of everything.
There is a powerful logic behind these verses of the Holy Quran and the
Bible. As we know in our general way of thinking we cannot have two
presidents sharing one chair of an office. Nowadays, there are still many
people on earth believing in many Gods. Hindus are more consistent than
the Christians as they say, “everything is GOD” implying the theory of
“Pantheism” and on other hand, Christians do claim same thing but on
the basis of one exception that “JESUS is the only begotten son” (John
3:16).
THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: SURAH AL- MAEDA (THE TABLE

SPREAD) 5:73
“Surely, disbelievers are those who said: "Allah is the third of the
three (in a Trinity)." But there is no ilah (god) (none who has the right to
be worshipped) but One Ilah (God -Allah). And if they cease not from what
they say, verily, a painful torment will befall the disbelievers among
them.”
In this verse, Allah is telling to mankind to cease saying the things
of the old to His majesty. Amazing fact is this, The Holy Quran never
speaks about particular “Trinity” rather giving us general warning to this
illogic phantom. As there are Christian missionaries who say that “in the
Holy Quran Surah 5:116-117, Allah speaks about different trinity than the
trinity we believe in.
Let us see what Holy Quran says there
THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: SURAH AL-MAEDA (THE TABLE

SPREAD) 5:116
“And (remember) when Allah will say (on the Day of Resurrection):
"O 'Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)! Did you say unto men: 'Worship
me and my mother as two gods besides Allah?' “He will say: "Glory be to
You! It was not for me to say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such
a thing, You would surely have known it. You know what is in my inner-
self though I do not know what is in Yours, truly, You, only You, are the
All-Knower of all that is hidden and unseen.”
Now, let us ask these Christian missionaries where did Allah use
the word “Trinity” in this Ayah? God in this verse is talking about the
Roman Catholics who say “Mary the Mother of God” and “Hail Mary”.
Holy Quran is very unambiguous regarding the matter of Trinity, in other
verses Allah says, “Trinity of any kind is forbidden as a blasphemy” and
in one place, Allah is exclusively talking about the matter of Jesus PBUH
for the Christians.
THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: SURAH AL-MAEDA (THE TABLE

SPREAD) 5:72
“Surely, they have disbelieved who say: "Allah is the Messiah ['Iesa
(Jesus)], son of Maryam (Mary)." But the Messiah ['Iesa (Jesus)] said: "O
Children of Israel! Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Verily,
whosoever sets up partners in worship with Allah, then Allah has
forbidden Paradise for him, and the Fire will be his abode. And for the
Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers) there are no helpers.”
This is the verse which is very potent regarding the people who say
that Jesus PBUH was God or even the part of the Trinity. Holy Quran says
that, Jesus PBUH said to his people at his time to worship only Allah and
we know this statement from the Bible too in many places.
LUKE 4:8
Jesus replied, "The Scriptures say, 'You must worship the LORD
your God and serve only him.'"
THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: SURAH AN- NISA (THE WOMEN) 4:171
“O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Do not exceed the

limits in your religion, nor say of Allah aught but the truth. The Messiah
'Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), was (no more than) a Messenger of
Allah and His Word, ("Be!" - and he was) which He bestowed on Maryam
(Mary) and a spirit (Ruh) created by Him; so believe in Allah and His
Messengers. Say not: "Three (trinity)!" Cease! (it is) better for you. For
Allah is (the only) One Ilah (God), Glory be to Him (Far Exalted is He)
above having a son. To Him belong all that is in the heavens and all that
is in the earth. And Allah is All-Sufficient as a Disposer of affairs.”
In the Holy Quran, the word for “Trinity” in Arabic is used “salaasa”
which means 3 or triune. On other hand, the word “Trinity’ is not to be
found in any version of the Bible but rather it comes out from the mouth
of the Christian Missionaries in preaching only. Christians are preaching
the translation of the translation to the rest of the world. Trinity was the
Ancient Myth which was adopted in the Christendom under the influence
of Romans and Greeks. On the contrary, more than 2 billion Christians’
salvation is hanging on this conundrum too. So, how can they let it go in
a flash? Remember that, if Trinity is to be proven false then there will be
no Crucifixion, no Atonement, no Redemption and no Resurrection. In

other words, Christianity will be doomed to the slivers.
Great fight between Eastern Churches and Western

Churches on one word “filioque”
Filioque, Latin for "and (from) the Son", is a phrase found in the
form of Nicene Creed in use in most of the Western. It is not present in
the Greek text of the Nicene Creed as originally formulated at the First
Council of Constantinople, which says only that the Holy Spirit proceeds
"from the Father": So, early Christians were confused and added and
subtracted whatever they liked according to their whims and fancies.
Infatuation towards Jesus PBUH made them real polytheists. Eastern
Churches say Holy Spirit was proceeded from Father only and Western
Churches say Father and Son (Jesus) too.
WHY NEEDED TRINITY?
Many centuries B.C, there were triads, or trinities, of gods in ancient

Babylonia and Assyria. The French "Larousse Encyclopedia of
Mythology" notes one such triad in that Mesopotamian area: "The
universe was divided into three regions each of which became the
domain of a god. Anu's share was the sky. The earth was given to Enlil.
Ea became the ruler of the waters. Together they constituted the triad of
the Great Gods." The belief of the triple god existed four thousand years
before the birth of Christ (PBUH). The Babylonians believed in it, when
they divided the gods into three groups, (the god of sky, the god of earth,
and the god of sea). Very few people know that the “TRINITY” was long
before Christianity in different religions and the cults long time before
Jesus’ birth. Before giving the numbers of Trinities, let me quote Paul of
Tarsus what he said in his letter to Romans.
Romans 3:7
“For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto
His Glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?”
Here Paul is reasoning that you can Glorify God in more

extraordinary way even if you have to make lies towards God’s majesty
(Astaghfirullah). You will not be accounted because it was done in the
Glorification only. This was what previous nations did at their times and
that is why real Christianity was diverted by Paul of Tarsus towards
Paganism of the old (Greek Myths). Having both nationalities Hebrew and
Roman, Paul knew Greek and Hebrew. That is why we find Greek for New
Testament and Hebrew for the Old. But Jesus PBUH and all his disciples
were 100 percent Jews and they preached and taught in the Jewish or
Aramaic language to their people. Can you believe that a Prophet came
to the people of Africa but preaching them in the language of Germany?
Let us see what God says in the Bible regarding the same matter.
DEUTERONOMY 12:30
“Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them (the
Pagans), after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou
inquire not after their gods, saying, how did these nations serve their
gods? Even so will I do likewise” EXODUS 23:32-33 SAME.
New Testament evidence shows us too that Paul was preaching to

the people who were in the habit of labeling heroes as Gods of Greeks
and Romans. This event happens after Paul healed the sick person as
same as these Christians are healing today under Jesus’ name.
Remember, the miracles which were given to Jesus PBUH from GOD was
to him only not to every Tom, Dick and Harry. Whereas, Jesus PBUH
healed sick people in God’s name and today’s Christians are healing in
Jesus’ name.
Acts 14:11-18
“When the crowd saw what Paul had done, they shouted in the
Lycaonian language, “The gods have come down to us in human form!”
12 Barnabas they called Zeus, and Paul they called Hermes because he
was the chief speaker. 13 The priest of Zeus, whose temple was just
outside the city, brought bulls and wreaths to the city gates because he
and the crowd wanted to offer sacrifices to them.14 But when the apostles
Barnabas and Paul heard of this, they tore their clothes and rushed out
into the crowd, shouting: 15 “Friends, why are you doing this? We too are
only human, like you. We are bringing you good news, telling you to turn
from these worthless things to the living God, who made the heavens and
the earth and the sea and everything in them. 16 In the past, he let all
nations go their own way. 17 Yet he has not left himself without testimony:
He has shown kindness by giving you rain from heaven and crops in their
seasons; he provides you with plenty of food and fills your hearts with
joy.” 18 Even with these words, they had difficulty keeping the crowd from
sacrificing to them.”
This is an amazing situation that Paul was delivering to these

people the warning but he was also on the same boat.
WHAT IS LYCAONIA?
In ancient geography, Lycaonia was a large region in the interior of

Asia Minor, north of Mount Taurus. It was bounded on the east by
Cappadocia, on the north by Galatia, on the west by Phrygia and Pisidia,
while to the south it extended to the chain of Mount Taurus, where it
bordered on the country popularly called in earlier times Cilicia and in the
Byzantine period Isauria; but its boundaries varied greatly at different
times. The name is not found in Herodotus, but Lycaonia is mentioned by
Xenophon as traversed by Cyrus the younger on his march through Asia.
That author describes Iconium as the last city of Phrygia; and in Acts 14:6
Paul, after leaving Iconium, crossed the frontier and came to Lystra in
Lycaonia. Ptolemy, on the other hand, includes Lycaonia as a part of the
province of Cappadocia, with which it was associated by the Romans for
administrative purposes; but the two countries are clearly distinguished
both by Strabo and Xenophon and by authorities generally.
Now, we can see Paul’s interaction was not with the Jewish people
and their tradition but rather much to the GENTILES (GOYIMS). That is
why the name of PAUL, “SAUL of TARSUS” was changed to “PAUL of
TARSUS” sound more like Roman or Greek instead of a JEW. Similarly,

they did change all the names of Jewish Prophets too into Latin or Koined
Greek intonations. Wherever the name was starting from “Y” they
changed it into “J”. The word “Binyamin” was changed into “Benjamin”
etcetera.
Jesus PBUH told all his disciples’ names and their mission in the
gospel according to Matthew. But Paul is not one of them and neither
prophesied by Jesus at his time.
Matthew 10:5
These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: "Do
not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans.
Matthew 15:24
“He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel."
Acts 9:26
“When he came to Jerusalem, he tried to join the disciples, but they

were all afraid of him, not believing that he really was a disciple.”
That is why the disciples of Jesus PBUH were terrified to join hands
with PAUL of Tarsus because of his background and the reputation of
persecution of the Jesus’ early followers. It was not a Trinitarian sect but
it was a Unitarian. That is why I call “Paulines” instead of Christians. And
Unitarians were the real followers of the Christ, who believe in One God
and Jesus PBUH as the messenger came to the them only.
TRINITY CONUNDRUM
1. FATHER the GOD (Kosher)

2. JESUS the GOD (Kosher)
3. HOLY GHOST the GOD (Kosher)
When Hindus say, we do not worship these idols but God through
them, Christians label them pagans on the highest level and when
Christians say, we worship One God in Three forms it is all kosher.
(Roman Catholics, Protestants, Lutheran, Methodist, 7th Day Adventist,

Mormons, Presbyterians almost all)
1. THE FATHER IS GOD

2. THE SON (JESUS) IS GOD (born on 25th, December)
3. THE HOLY SPIRIT (GHOST) IS GOD
“BUT THERE ARE NO THREE GODS BUT ONE GOD”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. THE FATHER IS HOLY
2. THE SON (JESUS) IS HOLY (born on 25th, December)
3. THE HOLY SPIRIT (GHOST) IS HOLY
“BUT THERE ARE NO THREE HOLIES BUT ONE HOLY”

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. THE FATHER IS ALMGIHTY
2. THE SON (JESUS) IS ALMIGHTY (born on 25th, December)
3. THE HOLY SPIRIT (GHOST) IS ALMIGHTY
“BUT THERE ARE NO THREE ALIMIGHTIES BUT ONE ALMIGHTY”

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. THE FATHER IS A PERSON

2. THE SON (JESUS) IS A PERSON (born on 25th, December)
3. THE HOLY SPIRIT (GHOST) IS A PERSON
“BUT THERE ARE NO PERSONS BUT ONE PERSON”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask these Christians through their “Holy Spirit” who is inside them
that what kind of language is this? English or Gibberish? Can you believe
this? God came down to this earth after billions of years and forgot to
explain Trinity once? These Jews at the time of Jesus PBUH could not
even understand his simple message then how could these later
Christians understand everything? Look, we Muslims have a good
excuse when somebody asks us, “Who is God and what he looks like?”
We Muslims reply, “He is not seen at any time neither we can comprehend
His nature to our minds nor the image. What we think is still our figments
but not a reality, just phantoms”. But when you ask the same question to
the Christians, they will say, “God is mystery”. Indeed, God is mystery
for the Muslims because our test is to worship unseen God. But Jesus
was God according to Christians then this mystery is solved as God
came down. What else do you want?
JOB 11:7
"Can you solve the mysteries of God? Can you discover everything
about the Almighty?
1TIMOTHY 3:16
"And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: GOD

was manifest in the FLESH, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels,
preached unto the Gentiles, BELIEVED ON in the world, RECEIVED UP
into glory."
So, I have to agree with the Christians at this point, but these
Christians say God came down to this earth to help us, to understand us,
to suffer like us and to pay the sins of the world. Now, I am asking, if GOD
HIMSELF came down then there should be no mystery left. When you
sleep with God, talk with God, walk with God, eat with God, “slap your
God”, “lance your God”, “Spit your God” (events happened to JESUS in
his trial before alleged Crucifixion) then there must be no mystery left.
But, unfortunately in whole New Testament not once Jesus ever

preached Trinity neither explained nor said anything regarding it not a
smudge or a doodle in the entire Bible. In fact, the word ‘Trinity” is not to
be found in any version of the Bible on this earth not even in the
Apocryphal ones.
So, my dear brothers and sisters you have no excuse by saying that
“GOD and TRINITY” is a Mystery beyond human’s endeavor. God says,
“He is not the author of confusion” but it seems to be an enigma
everywhere in Christianity even the Bishops are confused regarding the

matter of Trinity.
1 CORINTHIANS 14:33
“For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all

churches of the saints.”
WHAT IS HOLY GHOST OR HOLY SPIRIT?
Holy Spirit is a term introduced in English translations of the

Hebrew Bible, but understood differently in the main Abrahamic
religions. While the general concept of a "Spirit" that permeates the
cosmos has been used in various religions (e.g. Brahman in Hinduism
and Tao in Taoism), the term Holy Spirit specifically refers to the beliefs
held in the Abrahamic religions. For the majority of Christians, the belief
in the Holy Trinity implies the existence of three distinct Holy Persons:
God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit being One Eternal
Triune God. This doctrine and designation, however, are not shared by
all Christian’s denominations, or the other Abrahamic religions.
There are thousand people who never understand what Holy Spirit
really is! In Greek the word for spirit is “Pneuma”. So, the main character
of the Holy Spirit is to move people towards good deeds which all new
born again Christians claim to be having this free cheap gift without any
effort. I seldom ask Christians that if I never commit any sin in my life and
I do not believe in the Holy Spirit then what stops me from the evil?
Actually, the problem is this, under the Greeks influence; Christianity
confused “Holy Spirit” with “Arch Angel Gabriel” who brought down the
revelations. If we take Holy Spirit and put for an Arch Angel Gabriel, the
entire problem is solved. That is why; they depict the picture of wings on
Holy Spirit which was appeared in the form of a dove at Pentecost in the
river Jordon when John the Baptist was baptizing Jesus PBUH.
MATTHEW 3:16
“As soon as Jesus was baptized, he went up out of the water. At

that moment heaven was opened, and he saw the Spirit of God
descending like a dove and alighting on him. 17 And a voice from heaven
said, “This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.”
MATTHEW 12:32
“And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall

be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall
not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.”
That is why Jesus PBUH warned regarding the blasphemy of the

Holy Spirit because he was an Angel Gabriel who brought down all the
revelations from the beginning of the Prophet hood time to time;
similarly, we find the same verse with a correct attitude regarding this
matter in the Holy Quran.
SURAH AL BAQARA 2:97, 98
"Say: Whoever is an enemy to Jibreel (Arch Angel Gabriel) - for he

brings down the (revelation) to your heart by Allah’s will, a confirmation
of what went before, and guidance and glad tidings to those who believe
- Whoever is an enemy to Allah, and His angels and prophets, to Jibreel
and Mikaa’eel - Lo! Allah is an enemy to those who reject Faith."
SURAH AN NAHAL, 16:102
“Say, the Holy Spirit has brought the revelation from thy Lord in
Truth, in order to strengthen those who believe, and as a Guide and Glad
Tidings to Muslims.”
SURAH AL MAEDA, 5:110
“Then will Allah say: "O Jesus the son of Mary! Recount My favour
to thee and to thy mother. Behold! I strengthened thee with the holy spirit,
so that thou didst speak to the people in childhood and in maturity.
Behold! I taught thee the Book and Wisdom, the Law and the Gospel and
behold! thou makest out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, by My
leave, and thou breathest into it and it becometh a bird by My leave, and
thou healest those born blind, and the lepers, by My leave. And behold!
thou bringest forth the dead by My leave. And behold! I did restrain the
Children of Israel from (violence to) thee when thou didst show them the
clear Signs, and the unbelievers among them said: 'This is nothing but
evident magic.'”
HOLY GHOST or HOLY SPIRIT?
Most of the Christians do not know that in the originals there is no

word “Ghost” to be found in the Greek, the word is a “Spirit” which they
got corrected after many decades in the English world. The Greek word
“Pneuma” means “Spirit” not “Ghost”. And in the Hebrew language,
spirit word can also be used for Prophets. These Christians argue with
us on “trinity” and limit 3 personalities into one. Let us see is that true in
reasoning. If we consider the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit as
three separate entities, then we would generally ask these “newborns”
as it shows us that there are millions of Holy Spirits in the world.
Because, Father was always “one” in the essence, Jesus we have two
pictures of him, one was before his human form and a second after his
birth. So, we have two pictures of Jesus to worship and unnumbered Holy
Spirits to receive. As it seems to me like Hindus’ concept of believing
several Gods. If Jesus was god and came down to fulfill the final mission,
why would he pass the buck to somebody else to do the task? As they
say, “Jesus came for us for the final mission”. Jesus PBUH said clearly
regarding someone is coming after him. And it cannot be another “God”
which was a “Holy Spirit”. It was the prophecy of a man coming after him
which was Prophet Muhammad PBUH as being a true “Holy Spirit” to
guide mankind into all truth. Can you believe? God came down to earth
and passed the buck to another God? Why God came down to this earth
when he was unable to complete the entire task by Himself?
THE ANCIENT TRINITIES
THE HINDU TRINITY (TRIMURTI)
LORD BRAHMA the HINDU GOD (Blasphemy)

LORD VISHNU the HINDU GOD (Blasphemy)
LORD SHIVA the HINDU GOD (Blasphemy)
…………………………………………………………………….
THE GREEK TRINITY
ZEUS (THE FATHER)

HERACLES (SON)
HADES (BROTHER OF ZUES)
NOTE: In Greek mythologies, TRINITY varies a lot it is not constant.

…………………………………………………………………….
THE BABYLON’S TRINTIY
NIMROD the FATHER (Blasphemy)

TAMMUZ (ADONIS) the SON (Blasphemy)
SEMIRAMIS the HOLY DOVE or some cult worshiped Nimrod’s WIFE
(Blasphemy)
……………………………………………………………………..
THE BABYLONIAN TRIAD
ISHTAR (Blasphemy)
SIN (Blasphemy)
SHAMASH (Blasphemy)
………………………………………………………………………
BUDDHIST TRINITY
VAJRAPANI
MANJUSRI
AVALOKITESVARA
.....................................................................................
THE EGYPTIAN TRIAD
ISIRIS the FATHER (Blasphemy)

HORUS the SON (Blasphemy)
ISIS the MOTHER (Blasphemy)
………………………………………………………………..
THE EGYPTIAN TRIAD
RAMSES-2 (Blasphemy)
AMON-RA (Blasphemy)
NUT (Blasphemy)
…………………………………………………………………
THE PALMYRA TRIAD
MOON GOD (Blasphemy)

LORD OF THE HEAVENS (Blasphemy)
SUN GOD (Blasphemy)
………………………………………………………………….
THE PERSIAN TRINITY
ORMIZD (Blasphemy)
MITRAS (Blasphemy)
AHRAMAN (Blasphemy)
…………………………………………………………………
THE MAHAYANA BUDDHIST TRUINE
TRANSFORMATION BODY (Blasphemy)

ENJOYMENT BODY (Blasphemy)
TRUTH BODY (Blasphemy)
…………………………………………………………………
THE SCANDINAVIAN TRINITY
AOWEN (Blasphemy)
TORA (Blasphemy)
FREIE (Blasphemy)
………………………………………………………………….
THE MEXICAN TRINITY
TZIKLIBOKA (Blasphemy)
AHOTZLIPO SHTIKI (Blasphemy)
TLAKOMA (Blasphemy)
………………………………………………………………....
ANCIENT TRINITY SYMBOLS

This is an amazing fact that the entire Christendom in their holy
services, they show their symbol by wearing CROSS LOCKETS. If Jesus
was killed on something else, they would have worn different picture.
Now let us see this statement.
1. Crux Ansata (It is like a human figure with outstretched arms, and a
round, hollowed face.
2. Mithra’s Depiction (bear a crucified effigy, and the cross adorned the
tomb of Midas in Phrygia.
3. Trimurti (Agni, the god of light, and placed in the hands of Brahama,
Shiva, Vishnu, Krishna and other gods.
4. Crux Constellation (Crux, the Southern Cross, is the most familiar

constellation in the southern hemisphere. This tiny constellation (the
smallest in the entire sky) was once part of Centaurus, but the sight of
such a brilliant cross in the sky was so compelling that it became a
constellation of its own in the sixteenth century. Thousands of years
ago these four stars were an object of reverence in the countries of
the Near East. In the Biblical days, two thousand years ago, they were
just visible at the horizon. Some might find a religious connotation,
linking their disappearance with the Crucifixion of Christ. Over the
millennia precession has brought the cross far to the south; it is no
longer visible at latitudes north of 25 degrees).
Now, we can see that “crucifixion” and these symbols making

Jesus GOD, killing him on the cross (Crux) and making out the
redemption through blood, then rose up on 3rd day, “son of god”,” alpha
and omega”, “lamb of God”, all these titles and activities are conjecture
and Grecians myths. Everything is like a hotchpotch labyrinth. Dear
readers, we can sense that the myth of this Triune business was long
before Christianity came, that is why Allah sends His messengers time to
time to rectify the mistakes of the misguided people. The Sun was always
the pivotal attraction of the previous religions. As they think that Sun is
the “God” which brings down the light, heat and energy to us and for this
cause, we are surviving. So, they (ancient pagans) translated the “SUN”
of GOD to “SON” of GOD towards their heroes under Greeks and Romans
influences. Holy Quran tells us beautifully regarding the Sun, Moon and
Stars.
Note: Download the Google Earth, and then browse the “SKY”,
search for “CRUX” then you will get the constellation in the shape of
“CRUCIFY” lockets.
THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: SURAH FUSSILAT (EXPLAINED IN

DETAIL) 41:37
“And from among His Signs are the night and the day, and the sun
and the moon. Prostrate neither to the sun nor to the moon, but prostrate
to Allah Who created them, if you (really) worship Him.”
ALL THE NEWER VERSIONS OF THE BIBLE AFTER THE KING

JAMES VERSION, THE CLOSEST VERSE TO THE TRINITY WAS
EXPUNGED FROM THE NEWER VERSIONS AS AN
INTERPOLATION, CONCOCTION AND FABRICATION.
1ST EPISTLE OF JOHN5:7

“Forthere are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the
Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.”
The closest verse in the entire Bible towards Trinity was being
thrown out as a fabrication in Christendom, as Christian scholars say,
“one of the writer’s own marginal note for the edification for his children
came into the text which was not the part of the John’s letter”. So, they
rectified it. Amazing thing is this, when Holy Quran rectifies the Bible
these learned Christians do not hearken to it.
Now, there are only two verses in the entire Gospels where Jesus
PBUH supposed to be saying to his followers to Baptize in the name of
“Father, Son and Holy Ghost”.
MARK 16: 9-20
9 When Jesus rose early on the first day of the week, he appeared
first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had driven seven demons. 10 She
went and told those who had been with him and who were mourning and
weeping. 11 When they heard that Jesus was alive and that she had seen
him, they did not believe it. 12 Afterward Jesus appeared in a different
form to two of them while they were walking in the country. 13 These
returned and reported it to the rest; but they did not believe them either.
14 Later Jesus appeared to the Eleven as they were eating; he rebuked
them for their lack of faith and their stubborn refusal to believe those who
had seen him after he had risen. 15 He said to them, “Go into all the world
and preach the gospel to all creation. 16 Whoever believes and is baptized
will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. 17 And
these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive
out demons; they will speak in new tongues; 18 they will pick up snakes
with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them
at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well.”
19 After the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, he was taken up into heaven
and he sat at the right hand of God. 20 Then the disciples went out and
preached everywhere, and the Lord worked with them and confirmed his
word by the signs that accompanied it.
All these verses of Mark 9-20 have been thrown out as a fabrication
is RSV (Revised Standard Version). You will get these verses under
footnote now. Then Christians will tell us, we got another verse from the
mouth of Jesus Christ in the Gospel of Matthew. Let us see what Pope
Joseph Ratzinger has to say about this?
MATTHEW 28:19
“Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in

the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”
CATHOLIC CARDINALJOSEPH RATZINGER:
THE 1968 EDITION, Introduction to Christianity: By Joseph
Ratzinger. Page 82-83. He makes this statement as to the origin of the
chief Trinity text of Matthew 28:19. "The basic form of our (Matthew 28:19
Trinitarian) profession of faith took shape during the course of the
second and third centuries in connection with the ceremony of baptism.
So far as its place of origin is concerned, the text (Matthew 28:19) came
from the city of Rome."
The Trinity baptism and the text of Matthew 28:19 therefore did not
originate from the original Church that started in Jerusalem around AD
33. It was rather as the evidence proves a later invention of Roman
Catholicism completely fabricated. Very few people know about these
historical facts. Now, I want to ask a simple question to our fellow
Christian brothers that, who bribed Pope to say these words even when
his “Red Dangling Carrot” was also the “Trinity”? Actually, this is what
Holy Quran says regarding Jews and Christians that they hide the truth
to fulfill their dark desires. I challenge to go and visit the Vatican Libraries
then you will be able to see how much the lies the Church uttered and
concealed the truth since the creation of the 1st Church.
Contradiction of Luke and john the Baptist

MATTHEW 3:11
“I baptize you with water for repentance. But after me comes one
who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He
will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. 12 His winnowing fork is in
his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor, gathering his wheat into
the barn and burning up the chaff with unquenchable fire.”
Nowhere in the entire Bible Jesus ever baptizes anyone with “Fire
and Holy Spirit”. And these are two entities only but the formula of
Christian is “in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit”.
So, this verse indicates that there was no trinity in baptism at all.
That is why Pope exonerated the lie and told the truth.
BOOK OF ACTS CH 1-V5
“For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with
the Holy Ghost not many days hence”
Contradiction between Luke and Matthew. As John the Baptist said,
two entities and Luke was sayong one one entity.
CONRADICTION
Matthew (John the Baptist) = Fire & Spirit
Acts (Luke) = Water
Matthew 28:19 = Father & Son & Holy Ghost
CONRADICTION
Absolute proof that Matthew 28:19 was corrupted by Trinitarians by

putting words on Jesus PBUH.
The Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics:
As to Matthew 28:19, it says: It is the central piece of evidence for

the traditional (Trinitarian) view. If it were undisputed, this would, of
course, be decisive, but its trustworthiness is impugned on grounds of
textual criticism, literary criticism and historical criticism. The same
Encyclopedia further states that: "The obvious explanation of the silence
of the New Testament on the triune name, and the use of another (JESUS
NAME) formula in Acts and Paul, is that this other formula was the earlier,
and the triune formula is a later addition."
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28:
"The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form cannot be the

historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be
assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the
[Catholic] church."
The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:
"It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of
the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words]
of Jesus, but...a later liturgical addition."
Wilhelm Bousset, Kyrios Christianity, page 295:
"The testimony for the wide distribution of the simple baptismal

formula [in the Name of Jesus] down into the second century is so
overwhelming that even in Matthew 28:19, the Trinitarian formula was
later inserted."
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263:
"The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus

Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church
in the second century."
Hastings Dictionary of the Bible 1963, page 1015:
"The Trinity.-...is not demonstrable by logic or by Scriptural

proofs,...The term Trias was first used by Theophilus of Antioch (c AD
180),...(The term Trinity) not found in Scripture..." "The chief Trinitarian
text in the NT is the baptismal formula in Mt 28:19...This late post-
resurrection saying, not found in any other Gospel or anywhere else in
the NT, has been viewed by some scholars as an interpolation into
Matthew. It has also been pointed out that the idea of making disciples is
continued in teaching them, so that the intervening reference to baptism
with its Trinitarian formula was perhaps a later insertion into the saying.
Finally, Eusebius's form of the (ancient) text ("in my name" rather than in
the name of the Trinity) has had certain advocates. (Although the
Trinitarian formula is now found in the modern-day book of Matthew), this
does not guarantee its source in the historical teaching of Jesus. It is
doubtless better to view the (Trinitarian) formula as derived from early
(Catholic) Christian, perhaps Syrian or Palestinian, baptismal usage (cf
Didache 7:1-4), and as a brief summary of the (Catholic) Church's
teaching about God, Christ, and the Spirit..."
The Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge:
"Jesus, however, cannot have given His disciples this Trinitarian

order of baptism after His resurrection; for the New Testament knows
only one baptism in the name of Jesus (Acts 2:38; 8:16; 10:43; 19:5; Gal.
3:27; Rom. 6:3; 1 Cor. 1:13-15), which still occurs even in the second and
third centuries, while the Trinitarian formula occurs only in Matt. 28:19,
and then only again (in the) Didache 7:1 and Justin, Apol. 1:61...Finally,
the distinctly liturgical character of the formula...is strange; it was not the
way of Jesus to make such formulas... the formal authenticity of Matt.
28:19 must be disputed..." page 435.
The Jerusalem Bible, a scholarly Catholic work, states:
"It may be that this formula, (Triune Matthew 28:19) so far as the
fullness of its expression is concerned, is a reflection of the (Man-made)
liturgical usage established later in the primitive (Catholic) community. It
will be remembered that Acts speaks of baptizing "in the name of Jesus,
“...”
The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, page 2637, Under

"Baptism," says:
"Matthew 28:19 in particular only canonizes a later

ecclesiastical situation, that its universalism is contrary to the facts of
early Christian history, and its Trinitarian formula (is) foreign to the
mouth of Jesus."
New Revised Standard Version says this about Matthew 28:19:
"Modern critics claim this formula is falsely ascribed to Jesus and

that it represents later (Catholic) church tradition, for nowhere in the
book of Acts (or any other book of the Bible) is baptism performed with
the name of the Trinity..."
James Moffett's New Testament Translation:
In a footnote on page 64 about Matthew 28:19 he makes this

statement: "It may be that this (Trinitarian) formula, so far as the fullness
of its expression is concerned, is a reflection of the (Catholic) liturgical
usage established later in the primitive (Catholic) community, it will be
remembered that Acts speaks of baptizing "in the name of Jesus, cf. Acts
1:5 +."
Tom Harpur:
Tom Harpur, former Religion Editor of the Toronto Star in his "For
Christ's sake," page 103 informs us of these facts: "All but the most
conservative scholars agree that at least the latter part of this command
[Triune part of Matthew 28:19] was inserted later. The [Trinitarian]
formula occurs nowhere else in the New Testament, and we know from
the only evidence available [the rest of the New Testament] that the
earliest Church did not baptize people using these words ("in the name
of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost") baptism was "into"
or "in" the name of Jesus alone. Thus it is argued that the verse originally
read "baptizing them in My Name" and then was expanded [changed] to
work in the [later Catholic Trinitarian] dogma. In fact, the first view put
forward by German critical scholars as well as the Unitarians in the
nineteenth century, was stated as the accepted position of mainline
scholarship as long ago as 1919, when Peake's commentary was first
published: "The Church of the first days (AD 33) did not observe this
world-wide (Trinitarian) commandment, even if they knew it. The
command to baptize into the threefold [Trinity] name is a late doctrinal
expansion."
The Bible Commentary 1919 page 723:
Dr. Peake makes it clear that: "The command to baptize into the
threefold name is a late doctrinal expansion. Instead of the words
baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy
Ghost we should probably read simply-"into My Name."
Theology of the New Testament:
By R. Bultmann, 1951, page 133 under Kerygma of the Hellenistic

Church and the Sacraments. The historical fact that the verse Matthew
28:19 was altered is openly confesses to very plainly. "As to the rite of
baptism, it was normally consummated as a bath in which the one
receiving baptism completely submerged, and if possible in flowing
water as the allusions of Acts 8:36, Heb. 10:22, Barn. 11:11 permit us to
gather, and as Did. 7:1-3 specifically says. According to the last passage,
[the apocryphal Catholic Didache] suffices in case of the need if water is
three times poured [false Catholic sprinkling doctrine] on the head. The
one baptizing names over the one being baptized the name of the Lord
Jesus Christ," later expanded [changed] to the name of the Father, Son,
and the Holy Spirit."
Doctrine and Practice in the Early Church:
By Dr. Stuart G. Hall 1992, pages 20 and 21. Professor Stuart G. Hall
was the former Chair of Ecclesiastical History at King's College, London
England. Dr. Hall makes the factual statement that Catholic Trinitarian
Baptism was not the original form of Christian Baptism, rather the
original was Jesus name baptism. "In the name of the Father and of the
Son and of the Holy Spirit," although those words were not used, as they
later are, as a formula. Not all baptisms fitted this rule." Dr Hall further,
states: "More common and perhaps more ancient was the simple, "In the
name of the Lord Jesus or, Jesus Christ." This practice was known
among Marcionites and Orthodox; it is certainly the subject of
controversy in Rome and Africa about 254, as the anonymous tract De
rebaptismate ("On rebaptism") shows."
The Catholic University of America in Washington, D. C. 1923, New

Testament Studies Number 5:
The Lord's Command To Baptize An Historical Critical

Investigation. By Bernard Henry Cuneo page 27. "The passages in Acts
and the Letters of St. Paul. These passages seem to point to the earliest
form as baptism in the name of the Lord." Also we find. "Is it possible to
reconcile these facts with the belief that Christ commanded his disciples
to baptize in the trine form? Had Christ given such a command, it is
urged, the Apostolic Church would have followed him, and we should
have some trace of this obedience in the New Testament. No such trace
can be found. The only explanation of this silence, according to the anti-
traditional view, is this the short christological (Jesus Name) formula was
(the) original, and the longer trine formula was a later development."
"The Demonstratio Evangelica" by Eusebius:
Eusebius was the Church historian and Bishop of Caesarea. On

page 152 Eusebius quotes the early book of Matthew that he had in his
library in Caesarea. According to this eyewitness of an unaltered Book of
Matthew that could have been the original book or the first copy of the
original of Matthew. Eusebius informs us of Jesus' actual words to his
disciples in the original text of Matthew 28:19: "With one word and voice
He said to His disciples: "Go, and make disciples of all nations in My
Name, teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have
commanded you." That "Name" is Jesus.
By Dr. G. Reckart, Apostolic Theological Bible College
For over 20 years I have predicted the time would come when
evidence would prove that the words "of the Father, and of the Son, and
of the Holy Ghost" were added to Matthew's original Gospel. It did not
make sense to me for baptism to be in the name of the one who died and
was resurrected in Romans 6 and the Father and Holy Ghost had to be
mentioned in baptism. I could not reconcile why the Apostles ignored
Matthew 28:19 as it now exist in our KJV Bible and instead baptized in
the name of Jesus Christ only. Yes, in baptism they were "JESUS ONLY."
No one can find any other baptism in the New Testament. No one can
deny there is then ONE BAPTISM when reference is made to the New
Testament mikvah. Now we have the evidence and the trinity world is in
for a massive shaking.
It was known by the Catholic Church that the Jews had preserved
a copy of the original Gospel of Matthew in the Hebrew language. How
this was preserved and handed down we do not know. In fact, it does not
matter. It exists and that is proof enough that God wanted it
preserved. There have been many attempts to destroy the credibility of
this very valuable Hebrew Gospel for obvious reasons. It is the only
existing manuscript that proves Matthew 28:19 did not originally contain
the Trinitarian baptismal formula. Catholics and Protestants have no
other reason to cast doubt on the validity of this manuscript. Claims that
it is spurious are of course self-serving to Trinitarians. Such denials
make Jesus say what he did not say. This of itself is an abomination. It
is a sin to make Jesus say a Trinitarian baptismal formula and put into
his mouth their Trinitarian godhead doctrine fabricated at Nicaea in
325AD. Now that this manuscript is known among the Apostolic
Oneness, we will promote the fact that the Catholic Church has willingly
lied about Matthew 28:19 and the Catholics in general (including the
Eastern Orthodox) have lied to the world. Everyone who was baptized
with this false baptism has died lost and without salvation, deceived by
the Catholic Church. This damnation of millions is the greatest doctrinal
deception ever placed upon the human mind. If those in Trinitarianism
do not flee from this perversion and be re baptized in the name of Jesus
Christ, they accept their damnation of having no salvation in that false
baptism. It is because of this finding that many Evangelicals now claim
baptism is not essential to salvation and a person can be saved without
it. This Baptist false doctrine was developed when their scholars
discovered the trinity baptismal formula was not in the original Hebrew
Gospel of Matthew. Interesting that a false doctrine could be birthed
based upon what is not in the Bible, rather than what is in the
Bible. Trinitarians hid the knowledge of this Hebrew Gospel from the
Oneness Apostolics. But God made it possible that through a Baptist
scholar, the truth about the missing Trinitarian baptismal formula would
be published.
In 1995 Dr. George Howard translated a copy of Shem Tov's

Matthew Hebrew Gospel. You may purchase a copy of "Hebrew Gospel
of Matthew" from many sources. You can look at the evidence for
yourself. For the first time in modern history the text of Matthew 28:19
from this Hebrew Gospel text is being posted on the internet. I am the
first to post this text. I am sure others will steal my image files and go
make their own page. That’s ok, but at least has the fairness to tell me
you are taking it. At least tell me you are going to make a page. At least
give me credit for being the first to post it.
Shem Tov's Hebrew Matthew Gospel
This is ABSOLUTE proof, Trinity was fraudulently

added to this text
THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: ALE IMRAN (THE FAMILY OF IMRAN)

3:78
“And verily, among them is a party who distort the Book with their
tongues (as they read), so that you may think it is from the Book, but it is
not from the Book, and they say: "This is from Allah," but it is not from
Allah; and they speak a lie against Allah while they know it.”
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Why Jesus Forgot To Explain Trinity (By Inamullah Mumtaz)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Why Jesus Forgot To Explain Trinity (By Inamullah Mumtaz)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Why Jesus Forgot To Explain Trinity (By Inamullah Mumtaz)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

“WHY JESUS FORGOT TO EXPLAIN TRINITY?

“WHY JESUS FORGOT TO

JESUS PBUH SAYS: JOHN 17:3

“AND THIS IS LIFE ETERNAL, THAT THEY MIGHT KNOW THEE

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

All praises be to Allah Who has given me this opportunity to write

THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: 62:5

“The likeness of those who were entrusted with the (obligation of

NOTE: The founder of the idea of Trinity in Christendom was Athanasius

“Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom

“Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet

Christians are getting so much annoyed by the truth of Trinity

BUT GOD IS CONFUSING HIS ENTIRE CREATION IS NOT IT?

Jesus PBUH quoting verbatim quotation from his brother Moses

YACHID means “only (adjective)” NO SPACE FOR TRINITY

EKHAD means “one (numerical)” NO SPACE FOR TRINITY

HOW MANY GODS DO CHRISTIANS HAVE?

Which God should we follow? Father in the heaven or Jesus the

Tell me which God to follow?

Proceed to any discussion further; I want to educate my western

Arabic (2 types of plural = plural of numbers & plural of respect)

THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: SURAH AL HIJR (The Rocky Tract)

“Indeed, it is We (plural of respect) who sent down the Qur'an and

HEBREWS VERSUS TRINITY

The Encyclopedia of Religion Vol. 15 1987 admits: 'Theologians

The New Catholic Encyclopedia: 'The doctrine of the Holy Trinity is

The Encyclopedia of Religion says: 'Theologians agree that the

The Encyclopedia Britannica 1976 observes: Neither the word

Protestant theologian Karl Barth (as quoted in The New

The Encyclopedia Britannica mentions that, “the concept of the

JESUS PBUH SAYS

". . .for my Father is greater than I. . ." (John 14:28)

"O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me:

“I can own myself do nothing…” (John 5:20)

Moses PBUH was not having any kind of trinity concept in

THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: SURAH AL-ANBIYA (THE PROPHETS)

THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: SURAH AL- MAEDA (THE TABLE

Let us see what Holy Quran says there

THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: SURAH AL-MAEDA (THE TABLE

THE HOLY QURAN SAYS: SURAH AL-MAEDA (THE TABLE

“O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Do not exceed the

no Crucifixion, no Atonement, no Redemption and no Resurrection. In

Great fight between Eastern Churches and Western

WHY NEEDED TRINITY?

Many centuries B.C, there were triads, or trinities, of gods in ancient

Here Paul is reasoning that you can Glorify God in more

New Testament evidence shows us too that Paul was preaching to

This is an amazing situation that Paul was delivering to these

In ancient geography, Lycaonia was a large region in the interior of

TARSUS” sound more like Roman or Greek instead of a JEW. Similarly,

“When he came to Jerusalem, he tried to join the disciples, but they

1. FATHER the GOD (Kosher)

(Roman Catholics, Protestants, Lutheran, Methodist, 7th Day Adventist,

1. THE FATHER IS GOD

“BUT THERE ARE NO THREE GODS BUT ONE GOD”

“BUT THERE ARE NO THREE HOLIES BUT ONE HOLY”

“BUT THERE ARE NO THREE ALIMIGHTIES BUT ONE ALMIGHTY”

1. THE FATHER IS A PERSON

“BUT THERE ARE NO PERSONS BUT ONE PERSON”