Solari Report

✕
FREE VIEW
In Google Play

The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine

"What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." ~ William Shakespeare

By Catherine Austin Fitts

I am not a scientist. I am not a doctor. I am not a biotech engineer. I am not an attorney. However, I read, listen,
appreciate, and try to understand those who are.

I was an investment banker until politics made it impossible to continue to practice my art. I was trained as a
portfolio strategist—so I map my world by watching the nancial ows and allocation of resources. I was also
trained as a conspiracy generator and foot soldier—conspiracies being the fundamental organizing principle of
how things get done in our world. It was not until I left the establishment that I learned that those not in the club
had been trained to disparage and avoid conspiracies—a clever trick that sabotages their e orts to gather power.

My response to living at war with agencies of the U.S. government for a time was to answer the questions of
people who were su ciently courageous and curious to solicit my opinion. Over many years, that response
transformed into two businesses. One was The Solari Report, which continues to grow as a global intelligence
network—we seek to help each other understand and navigate what is happening and contribute to positive
outcomes. The other was serving as an investment advisor to individuals and families through Solari Investment
Advisory Services. After ten years, I converted that business to doing an ESG screen. What those who use it want
—that is not otherwise readily available in the retail market—is a screen that re ects knowledge of nancial and
political corruption. Tracking the metastasizing corruption is an art, not a science.

When you help a family with their nances, it is imperative to understand all their risk issues. Their nancial
success depends on successful mitigation of all the risks—whether nancial or non- nancial—that they
encounter in their daily lives. Non- nancial risks can have a major impact on the allocation of family resources,
including attention, time, assets, and money.

Many of my clients and their children had been devastated and drained by health care failures and corruption—
and the most common catalyst for this devastation was vaccine death and injury. After their lengthy and
horrendous experiences with the health care establishment, they would invariably ask, "If the corruption is this
bad in medicine, food, and health, what is going on in the nancial world?" Chilled by the thought, they would
search out a nancial professional who was schooled in U.S. government and nancial corruption. And they
would nd me.

The result of this ow of bright, educated people blessed with the resources to pay for my time was that, for ten
years, I got quite an education about the disabilities and death in icted on our children by what I now call "the
great poisoning." I had the opportunity to repeatedly price out the human damage to all concerned—not just the
a ected children but their parents, siblings, and future generations—mapping the nancial costs of vaccine injury
again and again and again. These cases were not as unusual as you might expect. Studies indicate that 54% of
American children have one or more chronic diseases. Doctors who I trust tell me that number is actually much
higher, as many children and their families cannot a ord the care and testing necessary to properly diagnose
what ails them.

One of the mothers featured in VAXXED—a must-watch documentary for any awake citizen, as is its sequel VAXXED
II: The People's Truth—estimated that a heavily autistic child would cost present value $5MM to raise and care for
over a lifetime. When my clients who were grandparents insisted that they would not interfere with their
children's vaccine choices because it was "none of their business," I would say, "Really? Who has the $5MM? You
or your kids? When your kids need the $5MM to raise their vaccine-injured child, are you going to refuse them?
You are the banker, and it is your money that is at risk here, so it is your business. Do you want to spend that
$5MM on growing a strong family through the generations or on managing a disabled child who did not have to
be disabled?" Often, that $5MM in expenditures also translates into divorce, depression, and lost opportunities
for siblings.

My clients helped me nd the best resources—books, documentaries, articles—on vaccines. You will nd many of
them linked or reviewed at The Solari Report, including in our Library.

Of all the questions that I had, the one that I spent the most time researching and thinking about was why. Why
was the medical establishment intentionally poisoning generations of children? Many of the writers who
researched and wrote about vaccine injury and death assumed it was an aberration—resulting from the
orthodoxy of a medical establishment that could not face or deal with its mistakes and liabilities. That never
made sense to me. Writings by Forrest Maready, Jon Rappoport, Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Arthur Firstenberg
have helped me understand the role of vaccines in the con man trick of saving money for insurance companies
and the legally liable.
Here is one example of how the trick may play out. A toxin creates a disease. The toxin might be pesticides or
industrial pollution or wireless technology radiation. The toxin damages millions of people and their
communities. Companies or their insurance provider may be liable for civil or criminal violations. Then a virus is
blamed. A "cure" is found in a "vaccine." The pesticide or other toxic exposure is halted just as the vaccine is
introduced, and presto, the sickness goes away. The vaccine is declared a success, and the inventor is declared a
hero. A potential nancial catastrophe has been converted to a pro t, including for investors and pension funds.
As a portfolio strategist, I admit it has been a brilliant trick and likely has protected the insurance industry from
the bankrupting losses it would experience if it had to fairly compensate the people and families destroyed.

Thanks to the work of Robert Kennedy and Mary Holland of Children's Health Defense, I now understand the
enormous pro ts generated by so-called "vaccines" subsequent to the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine
Injury Act of 1986 and the creation of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program—a federal no-fault
mechanism for compensating vaccine-related injuries or deaths by establishing a claim procedure involving the
United States Court of Federal Claims and special masters. Call a drug or biotech cocktail a "vaccine," and
pharmaceutical and biotech companies are free from any liabilities—the taxpayer pays. Unfortunately, this
system has become an open invitation to make billions from "injectibles," particularly where government
regulations and laws can be used to create a guaranteed market through mandates. As government agencies and
legislators as well as the corporate media have developed various schemes to participate in the billions of pro ts,
signi cant con icts of interest have resulted.

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREPA or the PREP Act) became law in 2005, adding to
corporate freedoms from liability. The Act "is a controversial tort liability shield intended to protect vaccine
manufacturers from nancial risk in the event of a declared public health emergency. The act speci cally a ords
to drug makers immunity from potential nancial liability for clinical trials of . . . vaccine at the discretion of the
Executive branch of government. PREPA strengthens and consolidates the oversight of litigation against
pharmaceutical companies under the purview of the secretary of Health and Human Services." (~ Wikipedia)

Over time, this has evolved to the engineering of epidemics—the medical version of false ags. In theory, these
can be "psyops" or events engineered with chemical warfare, biowarfare, or wireless technology. If this sounds
strange, dive into all the writings of the "Targeted Individuals."

I learned about this rst-hand when I was litigating with the Department of Justice and was experiencing
signi cant physical harassment. I tried to hire several security rms; they would check my references and then
decline the work, saying it was too dangerous. The last one took pity and warned me not to worry about
electronic weaponry, letting me know that my main problem would be low-grade biowarfare. This biowarfare
expert predicted that the opposing team would drill holes in the wall of my house and inject the "invisible
enemy." Sure enough, that is exactly what happened. I sold my house and left town. That journey began a long
process of learning how poisoning and nonlethal weapons are used—whether to move people out of rent-
controlled apartments, sicken the elderly to move them to more expensive government-subsidized housing,
gangstalk political or business targets, or weaken or kill litigants—and the list goes on. Poisoning turned out to be
a much more common tactic in the game of political and economic warfare in America than I had previously
understood.

After I nished my litigation, I spent several years detoxing from heavy metal toxicity—including from lead,
arsenic, and aluminum. As I drove around America, I realized it was not just me. Americans increasingly looked
like a people struggling with high loads of heavy metals toxicity. In the process of signi cantly decreasing my
unusually high levels of heavy metals, I learned what a di erence the toxic load had made to my outlook, my
energy, and my ability to handle complex information.

This brings me to the question of what exactly a vaccine is and what exactly is in the concoctions being injected
into people today as well as the witches' brews currently under development.

In 2017, Italian researchers reviewed the ingredients of 44 types of so-called "vaccines." They discovered heavy
metal debris and biological contamination in every human vaccine they tested. The researchers stated, "The
quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions ba ed us." They
then drew the obvious conclusion, namely, that because the micro- and nanocontaminants were "neither
biocompatible nor biodegradable," they were "biopersistent" and could cause in ammatory e ects right away—
or later (http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf)

Aborted fetal tissue, animal tissue, aluminum, mercury, genetically altered materials—and what else?

Whatever the ingredients of vaccines have been to date, nothing is more bizarre and unsettling than the
proposals of what might be included in them in the future. Strategies—already well-funded and well on the way—
include brain-machine interface nanotechnology, digital identity tracking devices, and technology with an
expiration date that can be managed and turned o remotely. One report indicates that the Danish government
and U.S. Navy had been paying a tech company in Denmark to make an injectible chip that would be compatible
with one of the leading cryptocurrencies.

I was recently reading Mary Holland's excellent 2012 review of U.S. vaccine court decisions ("Compulsory
vaccination, the Constitution, and the hepatitis B mandate for infants and young children," Yale Journal of Health
Policy, Law, and Ethics) and I froze and thought, "Why are we calling the injectibles that Bill Gates and his
colleagues are promoting 'vaccines'? Are they really vaccines?"

Most people are familiar with how Bill Gates made and kept his fortune. He acquired an operating system that
was loaded into your computer. It was widely rumored that the U.S. intelligence agencies had a back door. The
simultaneous and sudden explosion of computer viruses then made it necessary to regularly update your
operating system, allowing Gates and his associates to regularly add whatever they wanted into your software.
One of my more knowledgeable software developers once said to me in the 1990s—when Microsoft really took
o —"Microsoft makes really sh***y software." But of course, the software was not really their business. Their
business was accessing and aggregating all of your data. Surveillance capitalism was underway.

The Department of Justice launched an antitrust case against Microsoft in 1998, just as the $21 trillion started to
disappear from the U.S. government—no doubt with the help of specially designed software and IT systems.
During the settlement negotiations that permitted Gates to keep his fortune, he started the Gates Foundation
and his new philanthropy career. I laughed the other day when my tweet of one of Robert Kennedy Jr.'s articles
from Children's Health Defense—describing the gruesome technology Gates is hoping to roll out through
"injectibles"—inspired a response: "Well, I guess he is nally ful lling his side of his antitrust settlement."

If you look at what is being created and proposed in the way of injectibles, it looks to me like these technological
developments are organized around several potential goals.
The rst and most important goal is the replacement of the existing U.S. dollar currency system used by the
general population with a digital transaction system that can be combined with digital identi cation and tracking.
The goal is to end currencies as we know them and replace them with an embedded credit card system that can
be integrated with various forms of control, potentially including mind control. "De-dollarization" is threatening
the dollar global reserve system. The M1 and M2 money supply have increased in the double digits over the last
year as a result of a new round of quantitative easing by the Fed. The reason we have not entered into
hyperin ation is because of the dramatic drop in money velocity occasioned by converting Covid-19 into an
engineered shutdown of signi cant economic activity and the bankrupting of millions of small and medium-sized
businesses. The managers of the dollar system are under urgent pressure to use new technology to centralize
economic ows and preserve their control of the nancial system.

Just as Gates installed an operating system in our computers, now the vision is to install an operating system in
our bodies and use "viruses" to mandate an initial installation followed by regular updates.

Now I appreciate why Gates and his colleagues want to call these technologies "vaccines." If they can persuade
the body politic that injectible credit cards or injectible surveillance trackers or injectable brain-machine interface
nanotechnologies are "vaccines," then they can enjoy the protection of a century or more of legal decisions and
laws that support their e orts to mandate what they want to do. As well, they can insist that U.S. taxpayers fund,
through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, the damages for which they would otherwise be
liable as a result of their experiments—and violations of the Nuremberg Code and numerous civil and criminal
laws—on the general population. The scheme is quite clever. Get the general population to go along with de ning
their new injectible high-tech concoctions as "vaccines," and they can slip them right into the vaccine pipeline. No
need to worry about the disease and death that will result from something this unnatural delivered this quickly.
The freedom from liability guaranteed by the PREP Act through the declaration of an emergency—and the ability
to keep the emergency going through contact tracing—can protect them from liability for thousands if not
millions of deaths and disabilities likely to follow such human experimentation. Ideally, they can just blame the
deaths on a virus.

A colleague once told me how Webster's Dictionary came about. Webster said that the way the evildoers would
change the Constitution was not by amending it but by changing the de nitions—a legal sneak attack.

I believe that Gates and the pharma and biotech industries are literally reaching to create a global control grid by
installing digital interface components and hooking us up to Microsoft's new $10 billion JEDI cloud at the
Department of Defense as well as Amazon's multibillion cloud contract for the CIA that is shared with all U.S.
intelligence agencies. Why do you think President Trump has the military organizing to stockpile syringes for
vaccines? It is likely because the military is installing the roaming operating system for integration into their cloud.
Remember—the winner in the AI superpower race is the AI system with access to the most data. Accessing your
body and my body on a 24/7 basis generates a lot of data. If the Chinese do it, the Americans will want to do it,
too. In fact, the rollout of human "operating systems" may be one of the reasons why the competition around
Huawei and 5G telecommunications has become so fractious. As Frank Clegg, former President of Microsoft
Canada has warned us, 5G was developed by the Israelis for crowd control.

In the face of global "de-dollarization," this is how the dollar syndicate can assert the central control it needs to
maintain and extend its global reserve currency nancial power. This includes protecting its leadership from the
civil and criminal liability related to explosive levels of nancial and health care fraud in recent decades.
Which brings me back to you and me. Why are we calling these formulations "vaccines"? If I understand the
history of case law, vaccines, in legal terms, are medicine. Intentional heavy metal poisoning is not medicine.
Injectible surveillance components are not medicine. Injectible credit cards are not medicine. An injectible brain-
machine interface is not a medicine. Legal and nancial immunity for insurance companies does not create
human immunity from disease.

We need to stop allowing these concoctions to be referred to by a word that the courts and the general
population de ne and treat as medicine and protect from legal and nancial liability.

The perpetrators of this fraud are trying a very neat trick—one that will help them go much faster and cancel out
a lot of risk—at our expense. I understand why they are doing it.

What I don't understand is why we are helping them. Why are we acquiescing in calling these bizarre and deeply
dangerous concoctions "vaccines"? Whatever they are, they are not medicine.

So, what shall our naming convention be? What name shall we give to the relevant poisons, neurologically
damaging metals, and digital shackles?

Whatever we call them, I know one thing. THEY ARE NOT MEDICINE, WHICH MEANS THEY SURE ARE NOT
VACCINES.

View the French Translation: The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine (PDF).

View the German Translation: The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine (PDF).

Solari Report Interviews:

Central Bank Stimulus: Quantitative Easing 5.0 with John Titus
Deep State Tactics 101 Part III

Solari Special Reports:

VAXXED II: The People’s Truth with Polly Tommey
Special Solari Report: Vaccine Mandates with Mary Holland, J.D

View the French Translation: The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine (PDF).

French Translation The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine La fraude à l’injection : pourquoi ceci n’est pas un
vaccin.

View the German Translation: The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine (PDF).

German Translation The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine Die injizierte Täuschung: Es ist kein Vakzin!.

Solari Book Reviews:

The Autism Vaccine by Forrest Maready
unvaccinated by Forrest Maready
Crooked: Man-Made Disease Explained by Forrest Maready

Great Articles & Videos:

Childrens Health Defense: COVID-19: The Spearpoint for Rolling Out a “New Era” of High-Risk, Genetically
Engineered Vaccines
Compulsory Vaccination, the Constitution, and the Hepatitis B Mandate for Infants and Young Children by
Mary Holland
Hero of the Week: March 12, 2020 – Former President Of Microsoft Canada, Frank Clegg
Corbett Report: Bill Gates x 5
Collection Cup: Building a List of Best Sources on Vaccine Risks

Related reading:
Children’s Health Defense
VAXXED
VAXXED II: The People’s Truth
Jon Rappoport at nomorefakenews.com