A Crim SB-17-CRM-0168 People Vs Crisologo, Et Al 01-08-2019
A Crim SB-17-CRM-0168 People Vs Crisologo, Et Al 01-08-2019
SANDIGANBAYAN
QUEZON CITY
- versus-
Present:
CABOTAJE-TANG, P.J.,
Chairperson,
FERNANDEZ, S.J., J. and
DANILO REYES CRISOLOGO, FERNANDEZ, B., J. 1
et aZ.
Promulgated:
Accused.
~/~}~
1[------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1[
RESOLUTION
CABOTAJE-TANG, P.J.:
3 p. 1011, Id
4
Resolution -3-
Criminal Case No. SB-17-CRM-0168
People vs. Crisologo, et al.
~
6 pp. 1011-1012, Id
7 p. 1012, Id
8 p. 1012, Id
9 pp. 1014-1019, Id
10 p. 1015, Id
11 p. 1015, Id
Resolution -4-
Criminal Case No. SB-l7-CRM-0168
People vs. Crisologo, et al.
x------------------------ -------------------------------x
12 Footnote omitted ~~
13 Footnote omitted
14 Footnote omitted
15 Footnote omitted
Resolution -5-
Criminal Case No. SB-17-CRM-0168
People vs. Crisologo, et al.
16 Footnote omitted
17 pp. 1015-1016, Id
18 p. 1016, Id
19 p. 1016, Id
20 p. 1016-1017, Id
21 p. 1017, Id
Resolution -6-
Criminal Case No. SB-17-CRM-0168
People vs. Crisologo, et al.
x-------------------------------------------------------x
22 pp. 681-685, Id
23 pp. 614-627, Id
24 p. 4, Resolution; p. 684, Record; Emphasis supplied
~
2S 585 SeRA 267 (2009)
Resolution -7-
Criminal Case No. SB-17-CRM-0168
People vs. Crisologo, et al.
26 Footnote omitted
~
27 Footnote omitted
28 Footnote omitted; Emphasis supplied
Resolution -8-
Criminal Case No. SB-17-CRM-0168
People vs. Crisologo, et al.
x-------------------------------------------------------x
the Court carefully reviewed the records of this case and found
the existence of probable cause against the accused, viz:
~
30 The case stemmed from a complaint filed by the Field Investigation Office of the Office of the Ombudsman ~~
on February 7,2014 I' I~
31 p. 208, Id; Resolution promulgated on February 13,2017; p. 3, Resolution; p. 683, Record .
32 p. 208, Record
Resolution -9-
Criminal Case No. SB-17-CRM-0168
People vs. Crisologo, et al.
x-------------------------------------------------------x
SO ORDERED.
33 See Crespo v. Mogul, 151 SeRA 462 (1987); Fuentes v. Sandiganbayan, 494 SCRA 478 (2006);.Martinez
v. Court of Appeals, 237 SCRA 575 (1994)
,/
Resolution -10-
Criminal Case No. SB-17-CRM-0168
People vs. Crisologo, et al.
x-------------------------------------------------------x
WE CONCUR: