Comparison of The Structures and Mechanism of Arsenic Deactivation of CeO2-MoO3 and CeO2-WO3 SCR Catalysts
Comparison of The Structures and Mechanism of Arsenic Deactivation of CeO2-MoO3 and CeO2-WO3 SCR Catalysts
pubs.acs.org/JPCC
ABSTRACT: The mechanism of arsenic poisoning of CeO2−WO3 (CW) and CeO2−MoO3 (CM) catalysts during the selective
catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx with NH3 was investigated. It was found that the ratio of activity loss of the CW catalyst
decreases as the temperature increases, while the opposite tendency was observed for the CM catalyst. The fresh and poisoned
catalysts were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) temperature-programmed reduction with H2 (H2-TPR), X-ray
photoelectron spectra (XPS), NH3-temperature-programmed desorption (NH3-TPD), in situ DRIFTS, and in situ Raman
spectroscopy. The results indicate that arsenic oxide primarily destroys the structure of the surface CeOx species in the CM
catalyst but prefers to interact with WO3 in the CW catalyst. Additionally, the BET surface area, the number and stability of Lewis
acid sites, and the NOx adsorption for these two types of catalysts clearly decrease after deactivation. According to the DRIFTS
and Raman investigations, at low temperatures, the greater number of sites with adsorbed NH3 in the poisoned CM catalyst leads
to less loss of activity than the poisoned CW catalyst. However, at high temperatures, the greater number of Lewis acid sites
remaining in the poisoned CW catalyst may play an important role in maintaining the activity of this catalyst.
7
3
1.3
0.75
Figure 1. Rates of NO conversion normalized to the BET. Reaction conditions: [NO] = [NH3] = 500 ppm, [O2] = 3%, N2 balance, total flow rate =
400 mL/min, GHSV = 240 000 h−1.
systematically elucidated the factors influencing active sites and water, and excess (NH4)2CO3 solution was slowly added
the deactivation mechanism in As-poisoned Ce-based catalysts. dropwise to the solution mixture with vigorous stirring until the
It is well-known that MoO3 has greater resistance than WO3 pH was 9. After the solution was stirred for 6 h, the precipitate
to the As poisoning of V2O5/TiO2, but there is still no was filtered and then washed with DI water several times,
agreement on the specific mechanism of Mo improvement followed by drying overnight at 120 °C and calcination at 500
effect. Recently, on the basis of experiments and DFT °C for 4 h. The poisoned samples were obtained by immersing
calculations, Peng et al. proposed that the greater dispersion the samples in As2O3 solutions. In a typical synthesis, 30 mL of
of MoO3 on the TiO2 support and reactivity of the surface the As2O3 aqueous solution (2.1 g/L) was added to a 50 mL
Mo−O−Mo and MoO groups than those in WO3 were the beaker containing 2 g of fresh catalyst. The mixture was stirred
reasons for the resistance of MoO3.22 To better improve the for 2 h, dried at 100 °C for 10 h, and then calcined at 450 °C
applicability of CW and CM catalysts, it is necessary to for 3 h. The poisoned samples of the CW and CM catalysts
investigate and compare the effect of As on these two types of were denoted by “CWP” and “CMP”, respectively.
catalysts. Although MoO3 has been proven to be more effective 2.2. Catalyst Activity. Activity measurements were
for resisting deactivation by As in V-based catalysts, it is performed in a fixed-bed quartz reactor (i.d. = 6 mm) using
important to study whether this effect is also present in various 100 mg of catalyst at atmospheric pressure. The feed gas
Ce-based catalysts. Moreover, the study of the deactivation of mixture was controlled as follows: 500 ppm of NO, 500 ppm of
CW and CM catalysts is very different from traditional V-based NH3, 3% O2, 200 ppm of SO2 (when used), 5% H2O (when
catalysts. First, WO3 or MoO3 should be considered the used), and N2 as the balance gas. The outlet gas concentrations
primary active center rather than the catalytic promoter for of NO, NO2, NH3, and N2O were continually monitored using
these two catalysts. Second, Ce-based catalysts have wider a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (MultiGas
temperature windows; therefore, the deactivation effect and 2030 FTIR continuous gas analyzer). The data for the steady-
mechanism at both low and high temperatures are worthy of state activity of the catalysts were recorded after 40 min at each
intense investigation. temperature.
In this study, fresh and poisoned CW and CM catalysts were 2.3. Catalyst Characterization. The N2 sorption isotherm
prepared to investigate the poisoning mechanism by comparing and BET surface area of the samples were acquired at 77 K with
changes in the structural features, redox properties, acidity, a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 apparatus. The crystal structure
surface-adsorbed species, and active sites during the SCR was determined with an X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku, D/max-
process. We also attempted to clarify the relationship between 2200/PC). X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were obtained
the surface species and deactivation mechanism at both low and with an ESCALab220i-XL electron spectrometer from VG
high temperatures. Scientific. H2-TPR and NH3-TPD experiments were performed
using a chemisorption analyzer (Micromeritics, ChemiSorb
2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION 2920 TPx) and an FTIR spectrometer (MKS, MultiGas
2.1. Catalyst Preparation and Poisoning. CW and CM 2030HS), respectively.
catalysts with Ce/W and Ce/Mo molar ratios of 3:2 were In situ IR spectra were recorded on a FTIR spectrometer
prepared by a conventional coprecipitation method that has (Nicolet NEXUS 6700). The spectra were recorded as averages
been previously reported.12,23 In a typical synthesis, 2.605 g of of 32 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1. Additionally, in situ
Ce(NO3)3·6H2O and 1.078 g of (NH4)6W7O24·6H2O (CW) or Raman spectra were recorded with a Raman microscope (InVia
0.706 g of (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O (CM) were dissolved in Reflex, Renishaw) equipped with a deep-depleted, thermo-
18006 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03687
J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 18005−18014
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
electrically cooled, charge-coupled device (CCD) array attributed to Ce2Mo3O13 (PDF-ICDD 31-0331), hexagonal-
detector, and the 532 nm line of the laser was used for phase Ce2O3 (PDF-ICDD 44-1086), and cubic-phase Ce2O3
recording the Raman spectra. (PDF-ICDD 49-1458), were observed for the CM catalysts. No
visible phase of the WO3 species was observed in either the
3. RESULTS fresh or poisoned CW catalysts, signifying that WO3 can be
3.1. Catalytic Activity. The ratios of NO conversion better incorporated into the CeO2 lattice to form WxCe1−xO2−δ
normalized to the BET surface area for two types of catalysts solid solutions with a short-range order.25 The grain sizes of
under a high GHSV of 240 000 h−1 were calculated and are CeO2 on the CM and CW catalysts were also calculated using
presented in Figure 1; their balanced NO conversions are the Scherrer equation based on the (111) plane (Table 1). A
shown in Figure S1 in Supporting Information. It is noteworthy larger CeO2 crystallite size was acquired in the CMP catalyst.
that the loss ratio for the CW catalyst decreases with an However, for the CWP catalyst, the crystallite size was nearly
increase in temperature (from 59.0% at 200 °C to 0.9% at 450 unchanged after the deposition of arsenic oxide. It was
°C), although the difference between the fresh and poisoned postulated that the As-poisoning effect on Ce is likely more
catalysts narrows. In contrast, the reverse trend is observed for serious for CMP than CWP. To confirm this conjecture,
the CM catalyst (from 15.5% at 250 °C to 34.6% at 450 °C). Raman spectroscopy was used to explore the changes in
Despite a reduction of over 30% in the ratio of NO conversion chemical bonds and functional groups before and after
at 200 °C, the CM catalyst exhibits better low-temperature deactivation. As shown in Figure S3, for the CM system, the
antipoisoning performance than CW because the CW catalyst main peak of the cubic-phase CeO2 at 460 cm−1, due to the F2g
has approximately twice the loss ratio of CM at 200 °C. This mode, is reduced sharply after deactivation, but this peak
indicates that the arsenic oxide deactivation effect is different remains nearly the same after As poisoning of the CW
for the two types of catalysts and seems to be related to the catalyst.26 Moreover, compared with the fresh catalyst, CWP
reaction temperature. exhibits an obvious blue shift from 958 to 968 cm−1,
3.2. Structural Characteristics (N2 Physisorption, XRD, corresponding to the WO stretching modes of the
and Raman Spectra). As listed in Table 1, the BET surface isopolytungstate species. Additionally, some new peaks at 804
[νas(W−O)] and 636 cm−1 [νs(W−O−W)] attributed to the
Table 1. Structural and Textural Parameters Measured by N2 octahedral unit can also be shown.27,28 These results indicate
Adsorption, XRD, Raman, and H2-TPR that the deactivation of CeO2 can be mitigated by the
introduction of WO3 due to the stronger interaction between
pore pore position H2 As2O3 and WO3.
BET size volume crystallite of F2g consumption
sample (m2/g) (nm) (cm3/g) size (nm) (cm−1) (μmol/m2) 3.3. Redox Properties (H2-TPR and XPS). H2-TPR is a
CW 85.2 11 0.23 10.9 459 9.6
good method to explore both the reducibility of metal oxide
CWP 70.9 11.8 0.21 10.5 459 32.7
catalysts and the potential to take up oxygen, based on the
CM 32.6 23.8 0.19 12.2 461 42.6
changes in peak position and hydrogen consumption. Figure 3
CMP 24.4 24.5 0.15 14.4 461 66.1
Figure 4. XPS spectra of the fresh and poisoned catalysts over the spectral regions of Ce 3d (a), Mo 3d and W 4f (b), and As 3d (c).
surface area, for both series of samples increased significantly As species. However, no significant changes in the Mo 3d peak
after doping with reducible arsenic (Table 1). Therefore, this positions were observed in the CMP sample compared with the
indicates that the reducibility of the catalyst increases due to the CM sample. These findings suggest that the chemical
simultaneous reduction of As2O3, which may promote the environment of W is influenced more easily than that of Mo
production of N2O as a side reaction, similar to previous after the deposition of As. The XPS results of As 3d for the
reports of As-poisoned V-based catalysts.21 deactivated catalysts are shown in Figure 4c. Two characteristic
Surface information such as element valences and atomic peaks can be observed by fitting the curves: the first peak,
concentrations can be obtained through XPS. The deconvo- centered at 44.6−44.9 eV, can be assigned to As3+, and the
luted Ce 3d XPS results of two series of catalysts are shown in second peak, centered at approximately 45.6 eV, corresponds to
Figure 4a. As illustrated in the figure, the spin-splitting peaks As5+.33 According to the estimation of the peak areas, 6.49% of
correspond to the Ce 3d5/2 spin−orbit components (denoted the As5+ species exist on the surface of the CMP catalyst, while
by ‘“v”’) and the Ce 3d3/2 spin−orbit components (denoted by the surface As atoms on the CWP catalyst are mainly composed
‘“u”’). The bands marked by v, v″, v‴, u, u″, and u‴ (blue of the As3+ species. Additionally, the O 1s XPS for the
colored curves) can be ascribed to surface Ce4+ species with the investigated catalysts are presented in Figure S4. It is clear that
3d104f0 electronic state, whereas the others, labeled as v′ and u′ the surface concentration of oxygen “Oβ” increases in the
(red colored curves), can be attributed to surface Ce3+ atoms deactivated catalysts, which may be primarily due to As−OH
corresponding to the 3d104f1 initial electronic configuration.31 It deposited on the catalyst surface. Therefore, the suppressive
can be seen that the peak positions of Ce 3d are minimally effect of chemisorbed oxygen species provided by CeO2 active
changed in the CWP catalyst with only reductive surface Ce4+. sites could not be obviously observed in the O 1s XPS due to
In contrast, these positions for the CMP catalyst are shifted As−OH compensation.
toward a lower BE by 0.7 eV, with a decreased surface Ce4+/ 3.4. Surface Acidity. Surface acidity is another critical
Ce3+ ratio. Considering that the surface atomic concentrations aspect for evaluating the SCR performance. The influence of
of Ce4+ and the ratio of Ce4+/Ce3+ do not change significantly the added As species on the amount and strength of the acid,
(Table 2), either the surface coverage resulting from As atoms based on NH3-TPD experiments, is illustrated in Figure 5. Both
or the toxic effect on WOx may play the key role in CW catalyst the fresh and poisoned samples exhibit one NH3 desorption
deactivation. However, because the surface Ce4+ concentration
decreases more sharply than the surface Ce3+ concentration for
the CM catalyst (Table 2), the greater loss of surface Ce4+
atoms may be the main reason for the deactivation of the CM
catalyst.
The binding energies of W 4f7/2 and W 4f5/2, centered at 35.6
and 37.8 eV (Figure 4b) for the CW catalyst, were identified as
the energies of W6+, the values of which are close to those
reported by other researchers.12,32 On the basis of previous
reports, a shift to a lower BE in XPS is usually associated with
an increased electron density or reduction to a lower oxidation
state.16 Compared with the fresh catalyst, the W 4f peak
position of the CWP catalyst shifts by 0.23 eV toward a lower
BE, suggesting that some W6+ could be reduced by low-valent Figure 5. NH3-TPD curves of the fresh and poisoned catalysts.
Figure 9. Sequential Raman spectra of CW (a, b) and CWP (c, d) recorded under various atmospheres. The dehydrated catalyst is first treated by
NH3, then NO + O2 is added and the reversed order at 200 °C.
belonging to the arsenic oxide species occurred with the CMP to its basic surface. Therefore, the lower NOx adsorption of
and CWP catalysts (Figure 2), suggesting that the arsenic oxide CMP than of CWP at low temperatures due to the structural
species can be highly dispersed on the surface of catalysts.48 change of CeOx mitigates the deactivation of CMP. When the
Considering that the radius of As3+ (0.58 Å) or As5+ (0.46 Å) is reaction temperature is above 300 °C, the NOx adsorptive sites
less than that of Ce4+ (0.87 Å) combined with W6+ (0.62 Å) or become unimportant, and the reaction between ad-NH3 and
Mo6+ (0.64 Å), the replacement of Ce4+ combined with W6+ or gaseous NO and O2 (the E−R process) is the crucial SCR
Mo6+ by As3+ or As5+ to form a solid solution is unexpected. mechanism for both the CW and CM catalysts (Figure S6 and
Moreover, on the basis of the Raman spectra (Figure S3), the Figure S7). Although some Brønsted acid sites provided by As
Ce−O bonds of the CM catalyst are remarkably influenced by species can be found, these sites are inactive during the SCR
As species; therefore, the deactivation effect on CeOx should be reaction. Therefore, the loss of acid sites may play a key role in
the major reason for the loss of activity. In contrast, for the the high-temperature deactivation. Furthermore, for the CMP
CWP catalyst, the WO bond is shortened, with the catalyst, the reduced quantity of acid and Lewis acid sites,
appearance of a more distorted octahedral geometry and originating from the damage of the surface Ce species and
augmented isopolytungstate groups, indicating that WO3 is MoO bonds, may play the major role in the greater loss of
preferentially affected by As2O3. In other words, WO3 can be activity of this catalyst than CWP.
sacrificed to partly prevent the deactivation of CeO2. Therefore,
a reasonable explanation for the structural changes is that a 5. CONCLUSIONS
portion of the arsenic oxide can be primarily bonded as The mechanism of poisoning of CM and CW catalysts by
amorphous structures to the surface CeO2 (CM) and WO3 arsenic oxide was investigated, compared, and analyzed in this
(CW) via Ce−O−As and W−O−As linkages, respectively. work. It was found that for the CMP catalysts, the degree of
Additionally, because the electronegativity of As (2.18) is activity loss increases with temperature, while the tendency is
stronger than that of Ce (1.12), a portion of the surface Ce4+ reversed for the CWP catalysts. By exploring the changes in the
species of CMP can be reduced to the Ce3+ species after the physical structure, redox properties, acidity, surface-adsorbed
introduction of As due to the electron-withdrawing nature of species and reaction mechanism before and after deactivation,
As. These results, combined with the XPS results (Figure 4 and we determined that the reasons for these results are as follows:
Table 2), which indicate the formation of less excess surface (1) As2O3 has a major impact on CeOx by oxidizing a
Ce3+ on CMP, suggest that a redox process between Ce4+ and portion of the Ce3+ into Ce4+ species for the CMP catalyst.
As3+ may occur and inhibit the self-redox process of the Ce However, As2O3 prefers to interact with WO3 through W−O−
species, hindering the SCR reaction. In contrast, W(IV) hinders As linkages in the CWP catalyst. (2) As2O3 decreases the
the reduction of Ce4+ by As3+, and the strong interaction strength, number, and stability of acid sites for the two types of
between W and As may be the dominant reason for the catalysts. Moreover, CMP exhibits a more serious loss of Lewis
deactivation of CWP. Previous research on CW and CM acid sites with an increase in temperature compared with CWP.
catalysts had indicated that surface Ce atoms and unsaturated (3) According to the results of in situ DRIFTS and Raman
Wn+ cations are the main contributors of Lewis acid sites, while spectra, more Brønsted acid sites and reduced NOx adsorption
WOx (with an appropriate doping amount) or polymeric MoOx mitigate the deactivation levels in CMP catalysts compared with
units promoted the generation of Brønsted acid sites.14,25 CWP at low temperatures. At high temperatures, the greater
Combined with the structure effects discussed above, the loss of quantity of remnant Lewis acid sites in CWP originates from
Lewis acid sites derived from a decreased number of surface Ce the protection of the surface Ce species by WO3 and may play
atoms and distorted WOx species may be the key reason for the the key role in the reduced loss of activity of this catalyst
deactivation of the CMP and CWP catalysts, respectively. Thus, compared with CMP.
■
it is concluded that the surface structures of CWP and CMP are
influenced by As species in two different ways. ASSOCIATED CONTENT
4.2. Influence of As on the Reaction Mechanism. For * Supporting Information
S
the CM catalyst, when the reaction temperature is below 250
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
°C, previous research and our DRIFTS results (Figure 8) reveal
ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03687.
that NH3 adsorption is vital at low temperatures (via the E−R
process).14 Therefore, excessive NOx adsorption has an adverse Figures of activities, N2 adsorption curves, Raman
effect on low-temperature activity because of competitive spectra, XPS spectra, and additional DRIFTS spectra
adsorption. However, when As is introduced to the CM (PDF)
■
catalyst, the NOx adsorption of the poisoned sample becomes
weaker (Figure 6). Some of the ad-NH3 may be released to AUTHOR INFORMATION
retard the loss of activity due to deactivation. In contrast, for Corresponding Author
the CW catalyst, NOx adsorption can also participate in the *E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: +86 10 62771093.
low-temperature SCR process (via the L−H process).49 The Fax: +86 10 62771093.
loss of ad-NOx sites has a great impact on the deactivation of
the CW catalyst. In addition, on the basis of the structural Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
■
analysis of the CMP catalyst, the deposition of arsenic atoms
leads to the loss of surface Ce4+ and thus suppresses the
conversion cycle of Ce4+ to Ce3+. Nevertheless, the existing ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
W(IV) atoms on the CW surface hinder the reduction of Ce4+ This work was financially supported by National Natural
by As3+ because of the formation of stronger interactions Science Foundation of China (Grants 21325731, 21407088,
between W and As. However, the NOx adsorption sites for both and 51478241), National High-Tech Research and Develop-
types of catalysts are mainly provided by the CeO2 species due ment (863) Program of China (Grants 2013AA065401 and
18012 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03687
J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 18005−18014
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
2013AA065304), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (18) Senior, C. L.; Lignell, D. O.; Sarofim, A. F.; Mehta, A. Modeling
(Grant 2013M530643). Arsenic Partitioning in Coal-Fired Power Plants. Combust. Flame 2006,
■
147, 209−221.
(19) Hums, E. A Catalytically Highly-Active, Arsenic Oxide Resistant
REFERENCES V-Mo-O Phase Results of Studying Intermediates of the
(1) Liu, J.; Li, X.; Zhao, Q.; Hao, C.; Wang, S.; Tadé, M. Combined Deactivation Process of V2O5-MoO3-TiO2 (Anatase) DeNOx Cata-
Spectroscopic and Theoretical Approach to Sulfur-Poisoning on Cu- lysts. Res. Chem. Intermed. 1993, 19, 419−441.
Supported Ti−Zr Mixed Oxide Catalyst in the Selective Catalytic (20) Hilbrig, F.; Göbel, H. E.; Knözinger, H.; Schmelz, H.; Lengeler,
Reduction of NOx. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 2426−2436. B. Interaction of Arsenious Oxide with DeNOx-Catalysts: An X-Ray
(2) Meng, D.; Zhan, W.; Guo, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wang, L.; Lu, G. A Highly Absorption and Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Spectroscopy Study. J.
Effective Catalyst of Sm-MnOx for the NH3-SCR of NOx at Low Catal. 1991, 129, 168−176.
Temperature: Promotional Role of Sm and Its Catalytic Performance. (21) Li, X.; Li, J.; Peng, Y.; Si, W.; He, X.; Hao, J. Regeneration of
ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 5973−5983. Commercial SCR Catalysts: Probing the Existing Forms of Arsenic
(3) Habib, H. A.; Basner, R.; Brandenburg, R.; Armbruster, U.; Oxide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 9971−9978.
Martin, A. Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx of Ship Diesel Engine (22) Peng, Y.; Si, W.; Li, X.; Luo, J.; Li, J.; Crittenden, J.; Hao, J.
Exhaust Gas with C3H6 over Cu/Y Zeolite. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 2479− Comparison of MoO3 and WO3 on Arsenic Poisoning V2O5/TiO2
2491. Catalyst: DRIFTS and DFT Study. Appl. Catal., B 2016, 181, 692−
(4) Burch, R.; Scire, S. Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitric-Oxide 698.
with Ethane and Methane on Some Metal Exchanged ZSM-5 Zeolites. (23) Chang, H.; Jong, M. T.; Wang, C.; Qu, R.; Du, Y.; Li, J.; Hao, J.
Appl. Catal., B 1994, 3, 295−318. Design Strategies for P-Containing Fuels Adaptable CeO2-MoO3
(5) Busca, G.; Lietti, L.; Ramis, G.; Berti, F. Chemical and Catalysts for DeNOX: Significance of Phosphorus Resistance and
Mechanistic Aspects of the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by N2- Selectivity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 11692−11699.
Ammonia over Oxide Catalysts: A Review. Appl. Catal., B 1998, 18, 1− (24) Sing, K. S. W. Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid
36. Systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area
(6) Cristiani, C.; Bellotto, M.; Forzatti, P.; Bregani, F. On the and Porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603−619.
Morphological Properties of Tungsta-Titania De-NOxing Catalysts. J. (25) Peng, Y.; Li, K.; Li, J. Identification of the Active Sites on
Mater. Res. 1993, 8, 2019−2025. CeO2−WO3 Catalysts for SCR of NOx with NH3: An in Situ Ir and
(7) Martens, J. A.; Cauvel, A.; Francis, A.; Hermans, C.; Jayat, F.; Raman Spectroscopy Study. Appl. Catal., B 2013, 140−141, 483−492.
(26) Mamede, A. S.; Payen, E.; Granger, P.; Florea, M.; Pârvulescu,
Remy, M.; Keung, M.; Lievens, J.; Jacobs, P. A. Nox Abatement in
V. I. WOx-CeO2 and WOx-Nb2O5 Catalysts Deactivation During
Exhaust from Lean-Burn Combustion Engines by Reduction of NO2
Hexane Isomerization. AIChE J. 2008, 54, 1303−1312.
over Silver-Containing Zeolite Catalysts. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998,
(27) Picquart, M.; Castro-Garcia, S.; Livage, J.; Julien, C.; Haro-
37, 1901−1903.
Poniatowski, E. Structural Studies During Gelation of WO 3
(8) Topsoe, N. Y.; Topsoe, H.; Dumesic, J. A. Vanadia-Titania
Investigated by in-Situ Raman Spectroscopy. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol.
Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of Nitric-Oxide by
2000, 18, 199−206.
Ammonia. 1. Combined Temperature-Programmed in-Situ Ftir and (28) Ross-Medgaarden, E. I.; Wachs, I. E. Structural Determination
Online Mass-Spectroscopy Studies. J. Catal. 1995, 151, 226−240. of Bulk and Surface Tungsten Oxides with Uv-Vis Diffuse Reflectance
(9) Qi, G. S.; Yang, R. T.; Chang, R. MnOx-CeO2 Mixed Oxides Spectroscopy and Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111,
Prepared by Co-Precipitation for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO 15089−15099.
with NH3 at Low Temperatures. Appl. Catal., B 2004, 51, 93−106. (29) Boningari, T.; Ettireddy, P. R.; Somogyvari, A.; Liu, Y.;
(10) Li, F.; Zhang, Y. B.; Xiao, D. H.; Wang, D. Q.; Pan, X. Q.; Yang, Vorontsov, A.; McDonald, C. A.; Smirniotis, P. G. Influence of
X. G. Hydrothermal Method Prepared Ce-P-O Catalyst for the Elevated Surface Texture Hydrated Titania on Ce-Doped Mn/TiO2
Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3 in a Broad Catalysts for the Low-Temperature SCR of NOx under Oxygen-Rich
Temperature Range. ChemCatChem 2010, 2, 1416−1419. Conditions. J. Catal. 2015, 325, 145−155.
(11) Li, P.; Xin, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, L. Ce−Ti (30) Reiche, M. A.; Maciejewski, M.; Baiker, A. Characterization by
Amorphous Oxides for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3: Temperature Programmed Reduction. Catal. Today 2000, 56, 347−
Confirmation of Ce−O−Ti Active Sites. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 355.
46, 9600−9605. (31) Zhang, S.; Zhong, Q.; Shen, Y.; Zhu, L.; Ding, J. New Insight
(12) Chen, L.; Li, J.; Ablikim, W.; Wang, J.; Chang, H.; Ma, L.; Xu, J.; into the Promoting Role of Process on the CeO2−WO3/TiO2 Catalyst
Ge, M.; Arandiyan, H. CeO2-WO3 Mixed Oxides for the Selective for NO Reduction with NH3 at Low-Temperature. J. Colloid Interface
Catalytic Reduction of NOx by NH3 over a Wide Temperature Range. Sci. 2015, 448, 417−426.
Catal. Lett. 2011, 141, 1859−1864. (32) Baek, Y.; Yong, K. Controlled Growth and Characterization of
(13) Shan, W.; Liu, F.; He, H.; Shi, X.; Zhang, C. Novel Cerium- Tungsten Oxide Nanowires Using Thermal Evaporation of WO3
Tungsten Mixed Oxide Catalyst for the Selective Catalytic Reduction Powder. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1213−1218.
of NOx with NH3. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 8046−8048. (33) Lange, F.; Schmelz, H.; Knözinger, H. An X-Ray Photoelectron
(14) Peng, Y.; Qu, R.; Zhang, X.; Li, J. The Relationship between Spectroscopy Study of Oxides of Arsenic Supported on TiO2. J.
Structure and Activity of MoO3−CeO2 Catalysts for NO Removal: Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1991, 57, 307−315.
Influences of Acidity and Reducibility. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, (34) Hadjiivanov, K. I. Identification of Neutral and Charged NXOY
6215−6217. Surface Species by Ir Spectroscopy. Catal. Rev.: Sci. Eng. 2000, 42, 71−
(15) Qu, R.; Gao, X.; Cen, K.; Li, J. Relationship between Structure 144.
and Performance of a Novel Cerium-Niobium Binary Oxide Catalyst (35) Centeno, M. A.; Carrizosa, I.; Odriozola, J. A. NO−NH3
for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3. Appl. Catal., B Coadsorption on Vanadia/Titania Catalysts: Determination of the
2013, 142, 290−297. Reduction Degree of Vanadium. Appl. Catal., B 2001, 29, 307−314.
(16) Liu, Z.; Yi, Y.; Li, J.; Woo, S. I.; Wang, B.; Cao, X.; Li, Z. A (36) Mamede, A. S.; Payen, E.; Grange, P.; Poncelet, G.; Ion, A.;
Superior Catalyst with Dual Redox Cycles for the Selective Reduction Alifanti, M.; Prvulescu, V. I. Characterization of WOx/CeO2 Catalysts
of NOx by Ammonia. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 7726−7728. and Their Reactivity in the Isomerization of Hexane. J. Catal. 2004,
(17) Liu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Li, J.; Ma, L. Promoting Effect of MoO3 on 223, 1−12.
the NOx Reduction by NH3 over CeO2/TiO2 Catalyst Studied with in (37) Wu, Z.; Jiang, B.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Jin, R. Drift Study of
Situ Drifts. Appl. Catal., B 2014, 144, 90−95. Manganese/Titania-Based Catalysts for Low-Temperature Selective