Interactionists believe criminality develops through social interactions and the labeling of potential deviants by agents of social control. What is considered deviant is determined by social norms and can vary by context. No act is inherently criminal, but becomes so when labeled as such by powerful social groups who create rules. When an act is labeled as deviant, secondary deviance and stigmatization can occur where the person internalizes the label and seeks out other labeled individuals.
Interactionists believe criminality develops through social interactions and the labeling of potential deviants by agents of social control. What is considered deviant is determined by social norms and can vary by context. No act is inherently criminal, but becomes so when labeled as such by powerful social groups who create rules. When an act is labeled as deviant, secondary deviance and stigmatization can occur where the person internalizes the label and seeks out other labeled individuals.
Interactionists believe criminality develops through social interactions and the labeling of potential deviants by agents of social control. What is considered deviant is determined by social norms and can vary by context. No act is inherently criminal, but becomes so when labeled as such by powerful social groups who create rules. When an act is labeled as deviant, secondary deviance and stigmatization can occur where the person internalizes the label and seeks out other labeled individuals.
them. • They are interested in how criminality develops in the social interactions between a potential deviant and the agents of social control. “...social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders – the deviant is one to whom that label has been successfully applied” • No actions are by nature criminal or deviant – it depends on the norms of the society and the reaction of members of society of society in different situations and contexts. takes the view that people become criminals when labeled as such and when they accept the label as a personal identity For example, consider the situations where swearing at the top of your voice would and wouldn’t be considered deviant: – In the pub with your friends – On the bus – At home alone – In class – In the supermarket – At a football match • Therefore ‘normality’ and ‘deviance’ is relative • It changes according to cultural context and historical period • Deviance is therefore a matter of interpretation • Provide some examples what is considered deviance changing according to context and period • States there is no such thing as a deviant act. • No act is inherently criminal or deviant in itself, in all situations and at all times. • An act only becomes criminal or deviant when others label it as such. The social construction of deviance requires two activities: 1. One group which normally lacks power, behaves in a particular way. 2. Another group with more power, responds negatively to it and labels it as criminal. • Becker claims a powerful groups create rules or laws to define what counts as deviance and labels those who fail to conform as criminals or outlaws (outsiders) • Agents of social control are made up of group such as the police, the judiciary, and probation workers. • They work on behalf of the powerful groups to label and define behaviour of less powerful. • The behaviour of less powerful is subject to greater surveillance and control by these social agencies. • Distinguished between primary and secondary deviance • Primary deviance is insignificant deviant acts that have not been publicly labelled. • Secondary deviance is the result of societal reaction – of labelling. • Secondary deviance leads to stigmatization where people are shunned and excluded from normal society. • Lemert asserts that the criminal label can become a master status where society interprets all actions and motives within the context of the label. • Secondary deviance leads to prejudice, discrimination and produce a self-fulfilling prophecy and the labelled person may seek refuge with other people branded with a similar label. • Think of the consequences for sex offenders and ex-cons. Once a person has been labeled by others through secondary deviance, it is common for that person to incorporate that label into his or her own self-concept. They develop a stigma, or a powerfully negative label that greatly changes a person's self-concept and social identity. Once people stigmatize an individual, they have a difficult time changing their opinions of the labeled person, even if the label is proven to be untrue. They may also engage in retrospective labeling, interpreting someone's past in light of some present deviance. Similarly, people may engage in projective labeling of a stigmatized person. Projective labeling is using a deviant identity to predict future action.