Title 10 Crimes Against Property Part 1
Title 10 Crimes Against Property Part 1
PROPERTY
Crimes Against Property
MALICIOUS
ARSON
MISCHIEF
Classifications of Robbery
a. Homicide;
b. Rape;
c. Intentional mutilation; or
d. Any of the serious physical injuries
Effect When Both Violence or Intimidation and Force Upon
Things are Present
The crime is robbery with violence against or
intimidation of persons
SPECIAL COMPLEX CRIMES OF ROBBERY WITH VIOLENCE AGAINST OR
INTIMIDATION OF PERSONS
Punishable Acts:
1. When by reason or on occasion of the
robbery, the crime of Homicide is
committed;
Art. 298
Elements:
Art. 299
Mode 1: Entering Effected Through Force
Elements:
1. Offender Entered:
a. An inhabited House; or
b. Public Building
c. Edifice devoted to Religious worship
Mode 1: Entering Effected Through Force
Elements:
2. Entrance was effected by any of the
following means:
a. Through an Opening not intended for entrance or egress;
b. By Breaking any wall, roof, or floor, or door or window;
c. By using False keys, picklocks or similar tools; or
d. By using any fictitious Name or pretending the exercise of public
authority.
Mode 1: Entering Effected Through Force
Elements:
3. Once inside the building, offender Took
personal property belonging to another with
intent to gain.
Mode 1: Entering Effected Through Force
Rules:
1. Offender must "enter the house or building in which
the robbery is committed." The whole body must enter
the building or house.
Elements:
1. Offender is Inside a dwelling house, public
building, or edifice devoted to religious
worship, regardless of the circumstances
under which he entered it.
Mode 2: Acquisition of Property through Force
Elements:
2. Offender takes personal property
belonging to another, with intent to Gain,
under any of the following circumstances:
a. Breaking of doors, wardrobes, chests, or any other
kind of locked or sealed furniture or receptacle; or
b. Taking such furniture or objects away to be broken or
forced open outside the place of the robbery.
Case Summary
1. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES V. FLORENTINO LABUGUEN Y FRANCISCO ALIAS "TINONG," AND ROMEO ZUÑIGA (G.R. No.
223103, February 24, 2020)
ISSUE: Whether or not the accused must be convicted of Robbery With Homicide and Frustrated Homicide.
2. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. FLORENDO CASTRENCE, ET AL., accused; FLORENDO CASTRENCE y CORILLA and XXX (G.R.
No. 227882 ; August 27, 2020)
ISSUE: Whether or not the accused must be convicted of Robbery with Rape and Frustrated Murder.
FORMAT:
>PDF File
>Font size/style: 14/Times new roman
>Margin: 1 inch every side
>Paper size: Letter