The Design of Bullet Train Process Bogie and The Finite Element Analysis of Frame Strength
The Design of Bullet Train Process Bogie and The Finite Element Analysis of Frame Strength
The Design of Bullet Train Process Bogie and the Finite Element
Analysis of Frame Strength
Jun DAI
Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Department, Tangshan College, Tang Shan, 0630000,
He Bei, China
[email protected]
Abstract. The process bogie is a special equipment for bullet train maintenance. Frame is the main
the main load-bearing frame in the process bogie, and its fatigue strength directly affects the safety
performance of the entire process bogie. According to the actual maintenance needs, the project
design a process bogie. Using the finite element analysis software ANSYS, the finite element model
of frame is established, and the frame strength and rigidity is analyzed. Referring to the "Bullet train
bogie frame strength test method" (TB/T2368-2005) and the Ministry of Railways standard
"Railway vehicles strength design and test standard" (TB/T1335-1996), the frame strength is
assessed. The analysis results are consistent with the practical application.
Introduction
With the rapid economic development of China, the development of high-speed railway has now
entered a new stage. The safe and stable operation of bullet Train is becoming more and more
important. Usually, the daily maintenance of the bullet train is implemented through putting the
entire column into the overhaul base for simple maintenance and repair work, but the separation of
the bullet train’s body and bogie is needed when the maintenance level reaches three and above, so
there is a need to develop a set of equipment which can carry traction body and enable the body to
move between different locations.
The bullet train’s process bogie is an special equipment which replaces the high-speed bogie of
EMU and supports the train body to move between maintenance areas in the process state when
different CRH electrical multiple units are in the process of decoding and overhaul, and different
maintenance tasks of the high-speed bogie and the train body can be achieved as a result. Truss is
one of the key components of process bogie, and it not only is the skeleton of the installation of
various parts but also bears and passes the alternating vertical force, horizontal force and
longitudinal force. The fatigue strength of truss directly affects the safety of the entire process bogie
and is of great importance to the safety, reliability and economy of the railway locomotive vehicle
maintenance. Therefore, according to the ministry of railway’s standard-Power bogie frame strength
test method TB/T2368-2005) and Railway vehicle strength design and test specification
(TB/T1335-1996), static strength and fatigue strength of the process bogie’s frame are analysed and
the results can provide insight into the performance of the process bogie frame.
Fig. 2 The 3D model of the framework Fig. 3 The FEM model of the framework
927
to analyze the structure stress condition more comprehensive. The skew symmetric load is also
considered in the calculation.
According to the design requirements, the vertical load borne by each frame is
Vertical load acts, in the form of surface force, on installation surface of the frame’s center plate.
The transverse load must be considered in the calculation of frame’s strength, whose calculation
formula is:
Fy 0.5( Fz 0.5m g )
(2)
where m+ is the weight of the frame itself which takes the value 5t. Fz is the operating vertical load
which takes F/2=95.36KN. As a result, each frame’s operating transverse load calculated is
59.94KN, and it acts on the center plate bearing surface.
Skew symmetric load is a set of counter-balanced vertical force which acts on the frame and is
antisymmetric to the two axises of the frame. It takes the value Fxie =14.72KN in this calculation.
The FEM’s Design Condition of Frame
According to the standard TB/T2368-2005, the rolling coefficient , in the normal operating
condition, takes 0.10, and the floating coefficient takes 0.20. We only considered the floating of
the train body, so the floating coefficient takes =0.20. Table 1 shows six combined conditions
adopted in the calculation of the condition of the frame’s operating load.
e 0.5 1 2 2 2 3 2 3 1 2 (3)
928
According to TB/T1335-1996, for the no weld area, the greatest possible load or the allowable
stress under excessive load is the material’s yield limit. Under the applied load, the allowable stress
is the ratio of the material’s yield limit to the 1.5 times of the safety factor. For the weld area, the
greatest possible load or the allowable stress under excessive load is the ratio of the material’s yield
limit to the 1.1 times of the safety factor, and under the applied load, it is the ratio of the material’s
yield limit to the 1.65 times of the safety factor.
In this calculation, the working conditions are operating conditions, therefore under operating
conditions, the allowable stress of the Q235 steel plate weld structure material is 142MPa.
The calculation result of the frame’s stiffness
The structure of the frame will deform under the action of static load (operating condition 1), and
the maximum deformation appeared on the center plate bearing surface of the frame (4.247mm).
The minimum deformation appeared in the position of frame’s axle box (1.935mm) shown in
Figure3. In calculation the boundary element of the spring is set to linear stiffness, so it is very close
to the stiff spring in practice. The relative displacement of the center bearing surface of the frame to
the position of the axle box is 2.312mm. Seeing from the actual structure deformation and image of
the deformation effect, the principle deformation is the vertical one, and the 2.312mm relative
displacement is ideal, so the stiffness of the frame is enough. Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the
deformation cloud image of the frame in the first and second operating condition.
Fig. 4 Frame’s deformation in the first Fig. 5 Frame’s deformation in the second
operating condition operating condition
The Calculation Result of the Frame’S Strength
Figure 6 to Figure11 and Table2 show the calculation result of the maximum equivalent stress of
the frame’s operating load condition. From the figure, we see that the maximum equivalent stress of
the operating load condition is 116.719MPa, and it appears in the joint between the frame’s beam
and side beam.
Tab. 2 The calculation results of the frame’s maximum equivalent stress in operating load
condition(MPa)
Maximum
Calculation
equivalent The maximum equivalent stress location
conditions
stress(MPa)
Condition1 86.101 The joint between the frame’s beam and side beam
Condition2 103.321 The joint between the frame’s beam and side beam
Condition3 103.476 The joint between the frame’s beam and side beam
Condition4 136.719 The joint between the frame’s beam and side beam
Condition5 105.666 The joint between the frame’s beam and side beam
Condition6 114.356 The joint between the frame’s beam and side beam
929
Condition1: MAX=86.101MPa Condition2: MAX=103.321MPa
Fig. 6 von mises stress nephogram in Fig. 7 von mises stress nephogram in
condition1 condition2
Fig. 8 von mises stress nephogram in Fig. 9 von mises stress nephogram in
condition3 condition4
Fig. 10 von mises stress nephogram in Fig. 11 von mises stress nephogram in
condition5 condition6
930
Conclusion
Through the frame strength analysis of the bullet train’s process bogie frame, we can draw
conclusions as follows:
When the frame is under static load, the maximum relative displacement is 2.312mm. From the
stiffness calculation result of the frame’s FEM model, the stiffness of the frame is enough.
In the working condition described in TB/T2368-2005, the maximum equivalent stress of the
frame in working condition is 116.719MPa, and it is lower than 142MPa which is the alloable stress
standard of Q235 steel in working condition. The stiffness of the frame satisfied with the
requirement.
References
[1] Xiang-hui song, wang hong,yue-jin shang. Train bogie frame strength analysis [J]. Mechanical
Research & Application, 2012, (01): 1-3.
[2] Shen yi. Application of adjustable process bogie joist [J]. Railway Locomotive workers [J],
2011(1): 4-6.
[3] Li tao. Since the technology oriented diameter bogie frame design [J]. Electric locomotive and
the urban rail vehicles, 2003, (26): 25-27.
[4] Hua-jun luo, xi-hong chen, gong-an tao. The structure features and research strength of
ZMA100 type bogie frame [J]. Electric locomotive and the urban rail vehicles, 2014, (01): 10-14.
[5] Qing-qun lan, wang wei, li rui. Track inspection car bogie frame strength experiment and fatigue
assessment [J]. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, 2011 (02): 61-64.
[6] Hong-yan ye, ping-bo wu. Bogie weled frame static strength analysis and fatigue strength
evaluation [J]. Railway Locomotive workers 2013, (10): 23-28.
[7] Zhong-ming lv, jing-quan bi. The railway passenger car bogie frame structure optimization
analysis [J]. Railway vehicle, 2011, (07): 16-19.
[8] Railway industry standards of the People`s Republic of China, strength design and appraisal
regulations for railway vehicle TB/T1335-1996.
931