LIBERI V BELCHER, Et Al. (N.D. TX) - 185.0 - RESPONSE AND OBJECTION - Gov - Uscourts.txnd.205641.185.0
LIBERI V BELCHER, Et Al. (N.D. TX) - 185.0 - RESPONSE AND OBJECTION - Gov - Uscourts.txnd.205641.185.0
Filed 08/15/11
Law Offices of: PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE Identification No. 09867 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Ph: (610) 825-3134 Fx: (610) 834-7659 Email: [email protected] EVELYN ADAMS, Plaintiff c/o PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Ph: (610) 825-3134 Fx: (610) 834-7659 Email: [email protected]
Attorney in pro se and as Counsel for the Plaintiffs upon approval of Pro Hac Vice admission
LISA OSTELLA, and GO EXCEL GLOBA, Plaintiffs c/o PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Ph: (610) 825-3134 In Pro Se, Pending Mr. Bergs Pro Fx: (610) 834-7659 Email: [email protected] Hac Vice Admission LISA LIBERI, Plaintiff c/o PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Ph: (610) 825-3134 Fx: (610) 834-7659 Email: [email protected]
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION _____________________________________________ : LISA LIBERI, et al, Plaintiffs, : CIVIL ACTION : vs. : : Case No. 2:11-cv-00090-J : LINDA SUE BELCHER, et al, : Honorable Mary Lou Robinson : Defendants. :
1 Liberi, et al Plaintiffs Resp. in Opp to Def. Edgar Hales MTD
Filed 08/15/11
TO THE HONORABLE COURT: Plaintiffs Philip J. Berg, Esquire, in pro se and as Counsel for the Plaintiffs upon Pro Hac Vice admission, and Plaintiffs Evelyn Adams, Lisa Liberi, Lisa Ostella, Go Excel Global and the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg and files the within Response in Opposition to Defendant Edgar Hales [hereinafter at times Defendant or Hale] Motion to Dismiss. In support hereof, Plaintiffs avers as follows: 1. Plaintiffs filed suit against Defendant on May 4, 2009 in the U.S.
District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Docket Entry No. [Dkt. No.] 1. 2. Defendant Edgar Hale on behalf of himself filed an Answer and
Motion to Dismiss on May 26, 2009, Dkt No. 25. The Hales hired counsel who also filed an additional brief in support of Hales Motion to Dismiss on June 24, 2009. See Dkt No. 70. 3. Defendant failed to raise any Affirmative Defenses and failed to raise
the issue of protections under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution in his Answer (Affirmative Defense) and/or in his previous Motion to
Filed 08/15/11
Dismiss, Dkt No. 25 and therefore, is precluded from doing so now as they are waived; See Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [Fed. R. Civ. P.] 12(h). 4. Further, a Defendant in a lawsuit is precluded from bringing
additional Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, raising issues, defenses or objections that were available to the Defendant at the time he filed his original Motion to Dismiss. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(g)(2). Hales Motion to
Dismiss does not fit in any of the exceptions to these rules as outlined in Fed. R. Civ, P. 12(g)(2) and therefore, must be Dismissed. 5. Plaintiffs also object to the entry of Defendant Hales Exhibits 1
through 16 and the six (6) Cds. Plaintiffs were not served with the six (6) CDs and all these Exhibits are hearsay, double hearsay, unauthenticated and under dispute in violation of the Federal Rules of Evidence, [Fed. R. Evid.] 801(c), 805, 901, 902 and 1005 and are therefore, inadmissible, Fed. R. Evid. 802. 6. Moreover, Defendant Hales Exhibits 1 through 16 and his six (6)
unknown CDs are irrelevant in violation of Fed. R. Evid. 401 and 402 and therefore, inadmissible pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 402. 7. Even if Defendant Edgar Hales Motion was proper, which it is not,
false allegations, accusations and reporting of the false information are not Free Speech protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. See
Filed 08/15/11
Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250, 72 S. Ct. 725, 96 L. Ed. 919 (1952), (the Court held that libelous speech is not protected by the U.S. Constitution). 8. Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant Hales Motion to Dismiss is based
upon this Response in Opposition; Plaintiffs Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed herewith; the files and records on file with this Court and any oral argument which may be presented. WHEREFORE, for the reasons outlined herein and in Plaintiffs Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to Deny Defendant Edgar Hales Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs also seek travel expenses in the amount of Two Thousand Five Hundred [$2,500.00] Dollars for each Plaintiff, for a total amount of Ten Thousand [$10,000.00] Dollars payable within fourteen [14] days of this Courts Order payable through Philip J. Berg, Esquire, if a Hearing is set and held on Defendants Motion for each of the Plaintiffs forced to fly in and attend any such Hearing. // // // // // // // // // //
4 Liberi, et al Plaintiffs Resp. in Opp to Def. Edgar Hales MTD
Filed 08/15/11
Respectfully submitted, Dated: August 15, 2011 /s/ Philip J. Berg PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Identification No. 09867 (610) 825-3134 Attorney in pro se and as Counsel for the Plaintiffs upon approval of Pro Hac Vice admission Dated: August 15, 2011 /s/ Evelyn Adams EVELYN ADAMS, Plaintiff c/o PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Ph: (610) 825-3134 Email: [email protected]
/s/ Lisa Ostella LISA OSTELLA, and GO EXCEL GLOBAL, Plaintiffs c/o PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Ph: (610) 825-3134 Email: [email protected] /s/ Lisa Liberi LISA LIBERI, Plaintiff c/o PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Ph: (610) 825-3134 Email: [email protected]
5