Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Welfareeconomy2021 Chapter4
Welfareeconomy2021 Chapter4
Chapter 4
Efficiency and equity
We present the instruments to analyze inequality
and the questions linked to the equity efficiency
trade-off
• Distribution of income
• Lorenz curve
• Poverty threshold
• Headcount ratio
• Giny index
• Trade-off equity efficiency
Map of the talk
1) Measures of inequality
Poverty index, poverty gap, Lorenz curve and Gini index,
Dalton-Atkinson measures
Other dimensions of inequalities
Definition
The poverty threshold, poverty limit or poverty line is the minimum level
of income deemed adequate in a particular country.
The common international poverty line has in the past been roughly $1 a day.
Determining the Poverty threshold
The basic needs approach is one of the major approaches to the measure-
ment of absolute poverty in developing countries. It attempts to define the
absolute minimum resources necessary for long-term physical well-being,
usually in terms of consumption goods. The poverty line is then defined as
the amount of income required to satisfy those needs.
Determining the poverty line is usually done by finding the total cost of
all the essential resources that an average human adult consumes in one
year. The largest of these expenses is typically the rent required to live in
an apartment, so historically, economists have paid particular attention to
the real estate market and housing prices as a strong poverty line affector.
Individual factors are often used to account for various circumstances,
such as whether one is a parent, elderly, a child, married, etc. The poverty
threshold may be adjusted annually.
Headcount ratio
Definition
The Head count ratio (HCR) is the proportion of a population that
exists, or lives, below the poverty line.
For example, The New York Times in July 2012 reported the poverty
headcount ratio as 11.1% of American population in 1973, 15.2%
in 1983 and 11.3% in year 2000
Poverty GAP
Given an household, the poverty gap is the relative difference bet-
ween the household ’s income and the poverty threshold. For ins-
tance, if the poverty threshold is $ 1,25 and that one household
income is $ 0,50, then the poverty gap is
1, 25 − 0, 50
= 0, 6 = 60%.
1, 25
Definition
The poverty gap index is defined as the average poverty gap in the
population as a proportion of the poverty line
q
1 X z − yj
N the size of the population, q
PGI = the number of households which
N j=1 z
income is below z, q/N being
the HCR.
Features of the Poverty GAP
The poverty gap index is an important measure beyond the commonly used
headcount ratio. Two regions may have the similar headcount ratio, but
distinctly different poverty gap indexes. A higher poverty gap index means
that poverty is more severe.
Country Poverty line ($/month) Headcount ratio Poverty gap index Year
Albania 38 0.62 0.19 2008
Brazil 38 6.14 3.62 2009
Cameroon 38 9.56 1.2 2007
Comoros 38 46.11 20.82 2004
Laos 38 44 12.1 2002
Congo, Dem. Rep. 38 87.72 52.8 2005
Iran 38 1.45 0.34 2005
Yemen 38 17.5 4.2 2005
Australia 959 12.4 2.93 2010
France 861 7.1 1.44 2010
Germany 918 11 3.67 2010
Ireland 934 14.8 3.08 2010
Switzerland 1148 8.7 3.37 2010
United Kingdom 1027 8.3 2.06 2010
United States 1232 17.1 6.55 2010
Lorenz curve
Definition
The curve is a graph showing the proportion of overall income or wealth as-
sumed by the bottom x% of the peoplePoints on the Lorenz curve represent
statements like “the bottom 20% of all households have 10% of the total income”
- The situation of the country is depicted by
the curve between the area A and B
- A perfectly equal income distribution would
be one in which every person has the same
income. In this case, the bottom N% of so-
ciety would always have N% of the income.
This can be depicted by the straight line y =
x ; called the "line of perfect equality."
- By contrast, a perfectly unequal distribution
would be one in which one person has all the
income and everyone else has none. In that
case, the curve would be at y = 0% for all x
< 100%, and y = 100% when x = 100%. This
Comparing Lorenz curve (case of Denmark, Hungary and Namibia)
As you can see the income distributionst of Hungary and Denmark are almost
the same
Lorenz curve and GINI index
Definition
A distribution of income is a mathematical function that provides the probabi-
lities of occurrence of different level of income.
How to read the picture :
- 50% of the population
have an income below $
53.700
- 45% of the population
(different from the prece-
ding group) have an in-
come between $ 53.700 and
$206.600
- The top 5% have an in-
come above $206.600
The measure introduced by Sir Hugh Dalton is based on the premise that socie-
ties, under the assumption of a same mean, prefer more egalitarian distributions,
as the right distribution “equitable” in the next figure :
low and big income receive less weight, intermediaries income receive more.
This is the contrary of a spread. HOWEVER, this reconcentration is not always
possible when the mean is preserved.
Other representations : The Dalton-Atkinson measure
Definition
The Dalton-Aktkinson measure of inequality is the fraction of mean income a
society be willing to give up to obtain a situation where income is completely
equally distributed
Let define ill health as the rate of mortality. Deaton in a no so recent study
(2001) concludes that there is no direct link from income inequality to ill health.
However,
Indeed, in the US, White mortality and incomes are lower in places
where the fraction of blacks is higher.
Inequality in weath and growth
The growth and inequality literature has recognized that it may be the distribu-
tion of assets, rather than income, that underlies effects of inequality on growth
by restricting access to credit markets (Stiglitz and Weiss, 1981).
Inequality reduces income growth for the poor, but not for
the rich.
2a. Reducing the inequalities
Most of the inequity has been eliminated, but in the process, the total
number of oranges available has been diminished.
Efficiency and inequity trade-off, two possible disagreements
(this is a state of nature of anarchy, with limited recognition of the rights of others.)
Unanimously approved activities (bet. N & C )
With a benthamist social welfare function, one can argue that some
point on the efficient frontier (between N 0 & R) could be chosen by
the government. In the case of the picture, W is the best choice,
relative to the criterium of the particular dotted SWF.
In the considered case, the Egalitarian solution is far from the Rawl-
sian solution.
2b. Reducing the inequalities