Ye Olde Magic Mag Vol - 07 - Issue - 02
Ye Olde Magic Mag Vol - 07 - Issue - 02
Ye Olde Magic Mag Vol - 07 - Issue - 02
Vol.7
2
Mar. 2021
Copyright © 2021 Marco Pusterla
65
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
objects sold in the past quarter, and we ing the situation and following govern-
have the return of Chewing the (Magic) ment advice: in the UK the vaccination
Fat with observations on the history of programme is currently making great
magic and on magic collecting. strides and the expectation is to have
In this issue we have a few Classi- almost all the population vaccinated by
fied Ads (just below) and I have fixed a the end of the Summer. What we do not
problem we had with our website that know (and we cannot predict) is how
was preventing visitors from posting ads logistics will be for EMHC. At the end
and contacting us! If you look for magi- of March, we will take a decision and
cal memorabilia and/or have objects to send out an email: if you would like to
dispose of, please visit our website and come to London and meet up with fel-
book an ad: it is completely free! low magic collectors and historians, and
I had a few requests about what is visit some incredible magic collections,
going to happen with the next Europe- please visit https://emhc2021.com and
an Magic History Conference, planned subscribe to the mailing list to make
for September 2021 in London, organ- sure you won’t miss any information. A
ized by Fergus Roy with my support. quarter of the available places have al-
Of course, the Covid–19 situation is ready been reserved and we really hope
still ongoing and changing weekly, if not to be able to host a conference that will
daily, and government advice is chang- be safe, secure and magical!
ing, confusing and controversial. For the Take care, stay safe and enjoy this
time being, Fergus and I are monitor- issue of Ye Olde Magic Mag!
MP
Classified Ads
WANTED BOOKPLATES. Wanting to FOR SALE MAGICOL. Many
trade with other collectors: email me duplicates available; email for list
[email protected] [email protected]
67
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
It was a copy of this first edition an abbreviated third edition was pub-
that was offered for sale by a book dealer lished much later in 1744. The author
in Suffolk in the East of England. Sadly it – the wonderfully named and likely
was defective as it was lacking the hand- imaginary Theophilus Lucas – claimed
coloured folding frontispiece. Such to have inherited a large estate, which
are the fluctuation of prices in a niche he gambled away. The book therefore
market like ours that a good copy of the serves as a warning on the dangers and
Allman edition can vary dramatically; ills of gambling.
perhaps anywhere from £2,000–£3,500. The copy offered in March was a
Indeed an Allman edition was listed on nice copy of the first edition, in a con-
eBay in 2020 and remains on sale at the temporary binding and with good prov-
time of writing priced at $4,000. With- enance. It sold for £1,200 (£1,440).
out the folding frontispiece, however,
the dealer’s asking price of £1,200 for In last year’s article I noted the sale
the Hodgson edition looked too steep. of a very rare US book of the nineteenth
Nonetheless it is a rarity and was sold century, The Book of Experiments, or,
quickly, albeit at a lower price. Wonders and Secrets Made Plain (Bos-
ton, 1850) (TS102). Remarkably an-
On 4th March Dominic Winter other copy appeared on the market in
Auctions offered a copy of a rarely seen June, offered by a New York bookseller.
title on gambling, which includes “all More remarkable than the appearance
the most sharping Tricks and Cheats of another copy of this rare book was
(us’d by slight of Hand)”. Memoirs of the asking price – $8,900! Considering
the Lives, Intrigues, and Comical Ad- the copy lacks the original covers and
ventures of the most Famous Gamesters has been rebound, I can only assume
and Celebrated Sharpers (TS437) was that the bookseller may have been con-
first published in 1714. A second edi- ducting his own “experiments” with il-
tion appeared later in the same year and licit substances when setting the price.
For those interested, the copy
is unsurprisingly still for sale
at the time of writing.
69
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
72
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
magic book that comes up for sale to my of The Merry Medley for Gay Gallants
personal collection, sadly my pockets and Good Companions. Containing Di-
are not as deep as a number of other col- verting Stories, Choice Jests, Dextrous
lectors and many books elude me. I do, and Delightful Tricks in Leger–de–
however, like to track those books that I Main (1748), which is a later reprint of
cannot afford and enjoy watching their TS287/288. The book was bound with
travels between collections and, more other contemporary titles. This was pur-
often than not, across continents. chased by a book dealer who promptly
Last year I included two copies separated all the titles and rebound
of Engstrom’s The Humorous Magi- them for sale individually. The books
cian Unmasked (1836) (TS278). One of originally sold for £1,900 (£2,422) but
these copies has now found a home in The Merry Medley alone was listed for
a magic collection. It was the copy that sale at £3,950. Until recently it remained
was on eBay and purported to be signed on sale but appears now not to be. Per-
by Engstrom himself. Not only has the haps you are the new owner? If you are I
book now found a new owner in the US would love to know!
but I’m also happy to report that the sig- That’s it for another year. Para-
nature that I originally doubted has now phrasing Frier Bacon’s brazen head,
been cross–referenced against a known “2020 is. 2020 was. 2020 past.” Many
Engstrom signature and does appear to of us will be glad to see the back of last
be genuine. Certainly the best buy of the year and look forward to better things
two copies that were for sale! in 2021. Stay safe…and keep reading!
The final book I featured last year
was an exceedingly rare Dublin edition
75
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
Deodato
at 10 am on 18 December 1867. His
name in the registry office appears to be:
Giuseppe Salvatore Deodato. His father
was called Saverio Deodato of Giuseppe
(he was 45 years old when he registered
his son) by profession “Paratore” (the
person in charge of the decorations of
churches or public places). The mother
was called Maria Diana Palaia of Sera-
fino (38 years old at registration), a
stitcher. The witnesses present at the
recording were Antonino Rizza and
Domenico Rizza, both shoemakers.
The deed was signed only by the mayor
because both Saverio Deodato and the
witnesses were illiterate. You can see the
Mesoraca, where Deodato was born birth certificate on the facing page.
From the birth certificate, we The information gathered about
learn that the future magician was born Giuseppe Deodato’s artistic activity in
76
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
77
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
June 1908 p.308, writes that in America narily attractive. The costumes
there is little talk of Italian conjurers of himself and his assistant are
and this can be a good opportunity to very neat. The act should make
meet the magician Joseph Deodato good in any of the smaller 2–day
who is now in America and take the houses, and is well worth $100.
opportunity to know, study and magi- and 3 shows where the continuos
cians should familiarize with the style is in vogue.
of European magicians. From the article It was interesting to discover that
published in 1908 it is clear that Deo- Houdini and Deodato found them-
dato had been practicing the profession selves residing in New York with their
of magician for many years and that he residences quite close by. Deodato was
had lived in America at least since 1907. living at 189 Grand Street and Harry
In addition to being a prestigious magi- Houdini at 278 West 113th Street in
cian called “The King of Fire,” the effect New York (Harlem). We may speculate
that characterized him most was that of that the two may have had a certain re-
a sword swallower. He claimed to have lationship. But it is the attention and ad-
managed to swallow a 28–inch (71.12 miration that Houdini placed towards
cm) sword. One day, with the blade en- this artist that leads us to think that they
tirely swallowed, a cough caused him were friends. Of the two, Deodato was
internal injuries with haemorrhage. seven years older. His repertoire, was
This incident stopped him for some based above all on novelty, breathtaking
time with the result of eliminating the effects, and escapes, in a sense required
effect from the repertoire, considered the same qualities (courage, determina-
by Houdini to be taboo for American tion, ruthlessness and physical skills)
magicians. In his shows he was helped that Houdini also used in his perfor-
by his son and both managed to face mances.
the audience even if they did not have a Deodato and Houdini were on the
complete command of the English lan- same bill the week of 8th May 1908 at
guage. At the end of the article, Houdini the Keith’s Philadelphia and the man-
hopes that as many of his magician col- ager (C. E. Barns) had to say:
leagues met him, giving him a kind wel- Deodato. On at 7:03 19 min. Full
come, as happens abroad for American stage. This is a showy act, his
magicians always received in a cordial work rather stilted, but Deodato
makes a good appearance. Ex-
way.
hibits considerable skill, one or
Carl D. Lothrop, manager of the two of his acts were quite new.
Keith’s Theater in Boston, put Deodato Good applause and curtain call.
up as the first act on the week of 20 Deodato followed Houdini on this
April 1908 and said: bill (with the Kinetograph as the inter-
Deodato. On at 1:40, 19 min, full
mission) so was following quite a diffi-
stage; can close in 1, if neces-
sary; 3 shows. An Italian who is cult act, which proved very popular that
a very clever magician and has a night – when Houdini escaped from a
very good equipment, the stage “crazy cot” in eleven minutes. Houdini
settings being more than ordi- mentioned Deodato both in the May
78
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
79
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
Glenn Gravatt
The other magic related celebrities
in our series all received a somewhat
jaundiced, if not whimsical, treatment
in the press. Their stories all included
marriages in which the man was con-
siderably older than the woman. Their
escapades provided good copy and
amusement for readers, even though
the events may have been much more
82
e/385559387 Downloaded on Aug 30, 202
84
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
85
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
88
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
89
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
Notes:
1. The Toscani panel was already described – without mention of the conjurer – by Paul
Schubring in 1915 in his survey on cassoni (cf. Truhen und Truhenbilder Der Italienischen
Früh–Renaissance. Ein Beitrag zur profanmalerei im Quattrocento, Leipzig, KW Hiersemann,
1915, no.427, p. 320). It was revealed (by Volker Huber?) to collectors fortunate enough to
attend the EMHC Congress in Berlin (2007). Pierre Taillefer then showed its importance
in the iconographic corpus of illusionism in his study (unpublished) on La représentation
de l’escamoteur dans l’art de la Renaissance: la fortune éphémère d’un thème iconographique
(Master 1 in art history, Université Paris 1 Panthéon–Sorbonne, 2009, dir. Philippe Morel),
as well as in an iconographic study (“Bildbeschreibung” for “Einführung in die Bildkünste”
module, Leipzig University, 2008, unpublished). This discovery remained confidential in
France until the publications of Fanch Guillemin (F. Guillemin and S. Laurens, Art, illusion
& secrets, Saint–Evarzec, Artishow Editions, 2011, p. 36 and F. Guillemin, Histoire illustrée
de la magie blanche avant Robert–Houdin (3rd ed.), Lorient, Marchand de Trucs, 2017, plate
E).
For my part, not being linked at that time to collectors of magic, I discovered Toscani’s panel
in 2013, through the luck of my master’s research at the EHESS on illusionism in the Renais-
sance (dir. Yves. Hersant). I published it in my thesis Illusion du surnaturel et illusionnistes à
la Renaissance: entre théories et pratiques, conceptions techniques et représentations sociales,
Paris, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 2018, as well as in L’illusionnisme renaissant entre secrets et
merveilles. Vers une illusiographie, in Arcana Naturae, n. 1, 2020, p. 51–69
2. The “fishing scene” is quite ambiguous and could also lead to other interpretations. Marco
Pusterla (private conversation) interestingly suggested to me that it could perhaps represent
a children’s game, in which the girls are trying to collect the moon or the sun reflected in the
water. But, it is worth mentioning that fishing was also a courtly pastime, as blindfold games.
The whole panel is certainly an illustration of an old, as yet unidentified, story. Indeed, Tos-
cani was used to paint literary works (like Boccaccio’s Decameron). Further investigation is
ongoing.
3. Hocus Pocus Junior, The Anatomie of Legerdemain, London, Printed by T. H. for R. M.,
1635, sig. E2 r°.
4. Huber quickly made it known: cf. Peter Rawert, “Der erste aller Gaukler”, Frankfurter
allgemeine sonntagszeitung, 02/01/2005, p. 49. It was also visible in France during the ex-
hibition “Tours et detours de l’Escamoteur” in Saint–Germain–en–Laye (16/11/2016 –
31/12/2016) and reproduced in the exhibition catalogue (cf. Landeau Blandine, Le Chanu
Patrick, Taillefer Pierre, Virole Agnès, Tours et détours de l’escamoteur de Bosch à nos jours,
[Saint–Germain–en–Laye], 2016, p. 32–33).
5. A. C. Cooper, Giovanni di Marco (Giovanni dal Ponte) – cerchia – sec. XV – Cassone con
episodi tratti da una novella, London, ca. 1984 (Fototeca Zeri, inv. 33102).
6. Cf. Prévost, La Première partie des subtiles et plaisantes inventions..., Lyon, Antoine Bastid,
1584.
90
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
in his bed, who woke up and denied ve- their eyes and started to pronounce
hemently to have stolen the coin from some mystic words. Suddenly, the miss-
the bag. The Cards then explain that “a ing ecu materialized in the air and fell to
friend” of Lodovico, who was staying in the feet of Lodovico, who calmed down
the house, heard the fracas and ran to again and became very sweet towards
the room, to stop the poor woman from the lady, who, on the contrary, became
being further pummelled by the angry furious and assaulted and repeatedly bit
man. Once he managed to separate the him.
two lovers, this friend told them to close The important paragraph says:
Brothers in Deceit?
The Juggler and the Thief in Bosch’s
Iconic Painting by Jan Isenbart
very magician with at opposite poles may explain, in part, the
93
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
other), or in well known sayings such as ous than it may seem. Various analysts
“Hold on to your wallets, the magician have argued yes and no; they have al-
is coming!”, not to mention magicians ternately identified the nun as another
who are also explicitly announced as possible accomplice, also the child and
(stage) pickpockets. even the victim himself (!), the latter
“The Juggler” is in the centre one as a moral case displayed about
of many questions and speculations “the deceiver being deceived.” I disagree
among both art historians and magic with this stretched position, as I will ar-
aficionados. Was the painting we know gue and show further down.
and admire actually painted by Bosch I am particularly grateful to Dr.
himself? (Short answer: likely not; it Steffen Taut, who inspired me last year
seems to be a later work from Bosch’s with his exciting and instructive lecture,
workshop or a follower, but likely based News about Bosch’s ‘Juggler,’ at the 8th
on an earlier painting by Bosch which European Magic History Conference
was sadly lost over time, but of which in Vienna, to turn toward the painting
two early sketches have survived). again and analyse it in detail from a dif-
Another debatable question: Are ferent perspective. (Please check out his
the juggler and the thief accomplices or fine article summarizing his decade–
not, or is the thief just taking advantage long research in the recent issue No. 30
of the situation? The answer is less obvi- of Gibecière, Vol. 15, Summer 2020.)
A moral dilemma?
Before we dive into the detailed The juggler may anticipate the mo-
analysis of painting, let’s consider the ment of the theft and even facilitate it by
exact setup of the scene for a moment. directing the audience’s attention, but
Judging by the straight right edge of the he cannot see the act of thievery from
table, we are standing in a direct line his point of view; the spectators cannot
with it, in a slightly elevated position see it either, with the possible exception
which allows us to look onto the table of the red–dressed lady’s companion,
and into the juggler’s basket, but not whose left hand points somewhat am-
high enough to look over and beyond biguously either to the lady’s necklace
the bordering wall in the background. or at least in the direction of the thief. A
Concerning its dramaturgy, it master of his craft, the cut–purse shields
should first be noted that the painter his action from the spectators to his left
has chosen a perspective that allows us with his body position.
external observers a panoramic view of As a result, the full overview of the
the entire scene: the juggler, his table scene is only granted to us external on-
and props, the victim, the audience, and lookers. Thus, we are in the comfortable
the act of the cut–purse to be watched situation of being “omniscient” specta-
“live,” and thus his discovery and ex- tors (comparable to the omniscient nar-
posure, despite his innocent and mis- rator in fiction), and it is only through
directing gaze towards the sky (refer to this trick that we can grasp the entire
the centre spread). scene and evaluate the people and their
94
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
actions. This either puts us into the role nent, rich and goggling citizen is being
of an accomplice, a casual observer or robbed off his money, probably well de-
a policeman. It may also put us into a servedly so?
moral dilemma: Are we about to shout I like the thought that Bosch may
at the victim and alert him? Should we have composed the scene exactly this
lunge toward the thief and try to catch way in order to give us the full view, but
him? Or do we remain silent, as amused also a moral choice!
bystanders, and watch how an emi-
Independent actors or allied accomplices?
In my following analysis, which the right and the thief to the left (see
is part of a bigger study on the paint- the centre spread again). So both are
ing recently published in German in juxtaposed, “controlling” the scene and
Wittus Witt’s edition No. 4 of his A– the crowd between them, which would
B–C der Taschenspieler–Kunst (Vol. 2, make perfect sense for a crooked duo. In
Autumn 2020). I would like to focus on addition, an imaginary horizontal line
one central question: Is there any visual connects almost perfectly the tip of the
“proof ” that the juggler and the thief juggler’s hat with the thief ’s tilted fore-
are, in fact, accomplices? (Spoiler alert: head. In other words, both figures were
my answer is yes, but there’s more to placed on the canvas at the same height,
it!) So let’s take a very close look at the in the upper third of the painting.
painting and at possible indications, as 2. Only the juggler, the thief and
probably intended by the artist, for their the victim are shown in profile, while
connection. all other spectators stand facing us, the
1. The first observation is pretty viewer, more or less fully. In my opinion,
obvious: Both figures frame the scenery this is no coincidence either; it rather
which is displayed here, the juggler to underlines the intentionally established
Fig. 2
95
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
96 97
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
connection between these agents. After 4. If we measure the thief and the
all, it would have been easy to depict ei- juggler (without his hat) from head to
ther the thief or the juggler in a different toe, we find that they are practically of
perspective (just like an early pen draw- the same height (Fig. 3). Hardly a co-
ing by Bosch does, which likely served incidence, I would argue, as all other
as a study for this painting). figures in the painting clearly feature
3. A connection between the two divergent heights.
agents can also be established in terms 5. On closer inspection, the two
of colour: In high magnification, as al- agents under discussion appear much
lowed by the high–resolution images on more similar in terms of physiognomy
the fine website of the Bosch Research than one would think at first glance,
and Conservation Project (see http:// obscured by their formal distance (a
boschproject.org/#/book/), it becomes deliberate spatial misdirection by the
clear that the magical dark turquoise of artist?), different clothing and head
the evening sky is not only reflected in posture. If you put their heads face to
the magic props, but also in the clothing face in an image editing software, some
of both the juggler (see collar and shoe) great similarities become apparent: first
and the thief (see glasses and doublet, and foremost, the size and shape of
Fig. 2). their sharp noses and longish nostrils,
Fig. 3
98
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
Fig. 4
the somewhat almond–shaped eyes, but handle of another knife (Fig. 5, a discov-
also the well–defined mouth and chin ery and interpretation by Steffen Taut).
area, and finally their light Adam’s ap- Together, blade and pommel in the two
ples (Fig. 4). As further proof, their nos- different hands of the two agents merge
es can be exchanged in an image editing into one tool by one crook to commit
software and will fit, when mirrored, his damnable crime!
almost perfectly into each other’s face. 7. Regarding the painting’s geo-
Can this really be another coincidence? metrical composition (which is another
Or are we not rather talking brothers in focus of my bigger study), it is interest-
deceit here?! ing to note that the juggler’s misdirect-
6. Juggler and thief are not only ing right hand and the thief ’s executing
visually facing each other, but both are right hand lie at opposite ends of a clear
engaged in acts of secret manipulations: corridor of vision that runs diagonally
The thief is holding a knife in his right through the centre of the painting (Fig.
hand and cutting off the victim’s purse; 6). Its upper end is margined by the vic-
while directing the audience’s atten- tim’s chin, the lower end by the cone on
tion to the ball (or pearl?) in his right the table. Additionally, it should be no-
hand, the juggler covers an unidentified ticed that the juggler’s hand was placed
metallic object in his closed left hand, in the upper half of the painting, thus
which could very well be the knob or somewhat representing the “superficial”
99
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
100
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
Fig. 7
act of deception, “above the surface”, so known as the Fibonacci spiral) in the
to speak, while the thievery takes place composition of the picture. According
in its lower half, somewhat hidden “out to art theory, a picture motif based on
of focus” and “below the surface” of the this geometric construction is regarded
misleading action. in our culture as aesthetically pleas-
8. I would also like to point out ing and highly harmonious, in other
the obvious “triangular relationship” words as “beautiful.” The spiral starts
between the heads of juggler, victim at the painting’s key object, the big ball
and thief, respectively. As the horizontal or pearl in the right hand of the juggler,
auxiliary lines show, the three faces are then it curls around his body, brushes
positioned on the canvas at three differ- the foot of the juggler’s table, cuts the
ent heights, barely overlapping (Fig. 7). corpus delicti and ends just behind the
Thus, the juggler in his centred position thief ’s head (Fig. 8). Again, just a major
represents the link between the thief coincidence along the lines of “seek and
and his victim. While the knife is the ye shall find” or a conscious choice of
thief ’s internal tool, the juggler serves the painter for his meticulous composi-
as his external tool for misdirection. tion?
9. One of my most interesting dis- 10. Finally, I am convinced that
coveries in analysing the painting is the the painting displays, deliberately or
possible use of the golden spiral (also not, an optical illusion, which also
101
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
102
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
serves as a strong link between juggler that action field No. 1 is much longer
and thief. Let’s look at Fig. 9 and two than No. 2, right? In fact, both fields are
particular areas which I would term almost of the same length (see Fig. 9).
“fields of action.” Field No. 1 extends In other words: If you were to draw a
from the victim’s wide eyes in a direct circle from the center (the victim’s eye)
horizontal line to the right, to the raised through the juggler’s ball with a pair of
hand of the juggler and the object in it. compasses, this circle would roughly
This field links the moment of distrac- also intersect the thief ’s hand on the
tion with the spellbound victim watch- victim’s purse. In my interpretation, this
ing in awe. Field No. 2 connects the is not only an interesting optical illu-
distracted victim with the simultaneous sion; it also establishes a mathematical
theft of his purse. (thus “logical”) connection between
When you compare the distances juggler and thief, using the victim’s face
between the connected points on Fig. as the centre point.
1, you will probably get the impression
Conclusion
In summing up these findings, I erate unwanted attention and distrust.
would conclude a) that the juggler and With just a few resources and brush
the thief are not only most certainly ac- strokes, Bosch succeeded 500 years ago
complices, but, in fact, brothers in de- in an astonishing way to present us with
ceit, and b) that the painter has obvious- a precise and historically significant,
ly and deliberately resorted to all sorts early, wordless representation of the
of creative means (yes, let’s call them core psychology and mechanics of de-
“tricks”!) in order to establish this con- ception!
nection in a variety of ways, some more It is a second exciting thought
subtle, some others less. to me that Bosch might have critically
From a magician’s point of view I transferred the concept of Christian
find it rather fascinating that the painter Trinity, which was ubiquitous in his
not only carves out the importance of time, to a secular triangular combina-
the juggler’s body tension, silence and tion of “the distracting deceiver,” “the
gesture for the “magic moment” here, distracted victim” and “the larcenous
the inherent distraction which the thief accomplice who takes advantage of the
uses to execute his act; he also displays distraction” (dressed in religious guise!)
the distracting head posture and the here. Thus, he demonstrates geometri-
innocent look into the air of the per- cally the closely intertwined structural
petrator, but precisely because of this relationship of magic, deception and
“over-proving” the thief stands out from deceit.
the crowd and is unmasked, at least for Maybe Bosch deserves to be con-
us external viewers. As every magician sidered, beyond his already unique po-
knows today, “over–proving” and un- sition in art history, an early analyst and
natural behaviour achieve the opposite theorist of magic and deception?
of the intended effect and tend to gen-
103
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
Auction Action
document which should prove invalu-
able for any research on this long–for-
gotten, minor Dutch magician.
105
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
106
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
107
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
with more features than that most simi- “on the side” at home in the evening, so
lar to it, Yogano’s “Madrid.” it is not surprising he could make clever
mechanical alterations to a watch to
perfect a classic effect.
Another little–seen magical ef-
fect that raised a spectacular price, was
a copy of Ted Lesley’s Bending Wine
Glass, a trick devised by the late German
mentalist and magician from an idea by
Lee Earle presented in his show “Mani-
festations” (between 1987 and 1989).
The trick, described in detail in Lesley’s
Jon Martin’s watch: $9.500
book, Paramiracles, requires a wine
A very unusual object made by glass whose stem has been bent, and a
famed British magic builder Jon Martin faked book that allows an imperceptible
in the 1940s by modifying a solid silver rotation of the glass sitting on it. Lesley
pocket watch to make it perform a time had these books made and commercial-
prediction effect, was the second–high- ized in the early 1990s, but as the book
est paid item in the sale, fetching $9,500 had a German title visible on the spine,
($11,400). This is a very unusual item not many sold outside German–speak-
(Martin had made some Silver Hunter ing countries. I was surprised to see this
– double face – prediction watches in trick sell for $4,000 ($4,800) and attract
the late 1940s) made for Graham Ad- a spectacular number of bids: 43, mak-
ams (who was undoubtedly Martin’s ing it the lot with most bids in this sale.
major customer) who later sold it to The group of apparatus was fol-
Ken Brooke. The secret mechanism of lowed by around 20 lots of Italian books
this watch is such that it is almost im- from the collection of Gianni Pasqua,
possible to discover and far superior to most of whom seemed having only a
that of the highly collectible “Stull” pre- passing connection to magic and most
diction watch. Jon Martin was a watch- of which sold for over their high esti-
maker by trade and repaired watches mate, at prices that I don’t feel repre-
sent value for money. A clear example
was a copy of the third edition of Pietro
Aretino’s Le Carte Parlanti, published in
1650 (the first edition was from 1543).
This edition is probably the least inter-
esting, as the text had been edited to
remove some of the most controversial
words by Aretino, in a valiant effort to
make the book approved by the Church.
Unfortunately, these efforts were not
successful, as the book ended up in the
Index librorum prohibitorum, or the list
Ted Lesley’s bending glass: $4,000
108
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
109
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
113
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
115
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
On Bookes
for to Rede is my Delyte
and the numerous letters between him ago who had an obsession still shared
and Houdini (and the letters by Robert by a few people today. Highly recom-
Evans, his nephew, following Evanion’s mended.
death) are part of the Harry Ransom • Early English Conjuring Collectors: James
Center at the University of Texas and Savren and Henry Evanion • Jim Hagy •
Reginald Scot Books, Glenview, IL, 2020 •
were the primary source on which
196 pages • 18 x 18 cm • softcover • $45 •
James Hagy worked on. [email protected]
A smaller part of the book deals
with the enigmatic James Savren, of
whom a few broadsides exist, who ap-
parently had a shorter professional ca-
• Maryland’s Ambassador of
reer and was contemporary of Evanion. Magic: Phil Thomas and the
The information provided here is im- Yogi Magic Mart
portant, but data on the magical doings by Mark Walker, Mike Rose
of Savren is as scarce as hen teeth and I Reviewed by Marco Pusterla
believe most is between these two cov- Books on the history of magic
ers. The production of the book is nice, come in all shapes and forms, from
keeping the same (square) size of James those talking about magicians long
and Sage Hagy’s previous book (Fair dead, to those printed on demand on
Tricks: The Magicians at the Columbian your doorstep; the latest work by Mark
Exposition, Chicago 1893) which we re- Walker (of Spook Shows fame) and
viewed in Vol. 6 n. 1, and it is limited to Mike Rose (owner of a business dealing
500 copies. Many colour pictures enrich with magic antiques) is a nice change
the volume (but their captions are still in this direction. The subject, Balti-
quite faint) and 645 endnotes provide more’s magic dealer Phil Thomas, is a
all the extra information you can ever character still alive in the memory of
need. Six appendixes provide a pleth- more mature magicians, having owned
ora of information on both Evanion an important magic shop in Maryland
and Savren, like listing all their known from 1944 to 1985 and having passed
shows (and I was pleasantly surprised away only in 1998. And the book is not
to discover that Evanion performed a print on demand job, but a nice, limit-
in Bury St. Edmunds, my town, in the ed edition of 500, on high quality paper,
same building where also Prof. Ander- rich with many black and white photos
son and myself did), the list of Evanion’s of Thomas, friends, the shop, and of a
tricks, his addresses, and more. few performances.
The personality of Evanion and The story of how a magic enthusi-
his importance for the preservation of ast became a professional performer for
magic history really comes out in the private parties closer to his home, and
book and I believe it to be a worthy ad- how he owned a large magic shop (and a
dition to the library of any magic collec- noteworthy collection of apparatus and
tor or anybody interested in the story of magic memorabilia) and a magic club,
the creation and preservation of a col- is narrated in a very conversational way
lection, introducing a gentleman of long by the two authors, both of whom, as
118
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
or so in the late 19th century. When both seemed to think so), Dante, Er-
she retired from the stage, she eventu- nest Thorn, and Clinton Burgess, as
ally settled in Berlin and began a sec- well as her father, her uncle Alexander,
ond successful career as a singing coach and her aunt Adelaide, who was a few
with her own studio. What makes her months younger than Blanche. Spoiler
of possible interest to magic historians alert: I enjoyed learning that her fa-
is that she was the only surviving child ther’s favourite hobby was fishing and
(a younger sister died in infancy) of the that although he may have spoken as
great magician Compars Herrmann many as 9 languages fluently, he could
(1816–1887) and his first wife, the op- neither read nor write, though he did
era diva Róza Csillag (1832–1892). A learn to sign his name. In her pursuit
chance encounter in a bank in Berlin of an inheritance from the estate of the
with a young American college gradu- late Adelaide Herrmann, she claims to
ate, Hall Lippincott, in 1928 when she have been responsible for convincing
was 75 resulted in a friendship and cor- Alexander to marry “Addie.” Ultimately
respondence that lasted until Septem- this is not a book about magic and ma-
ber 1939. This book provides transcrip- gicians, but letters revealing Corelli’s in-
tions of the 72 surviving letters she sent creasingly difficult circumstances dur-
to Lippincott (note: the letters written ing the Great Depression and then the
between March 1935 and June 1939 Third Reich. Lippincott becomes her
have been lost) and a careful reader will benefactor, sending small sums of badly
be rewarded with mentions of Houdini needed cash with each letter, in return
(who may have been related to her on for which she would occasionally send
her mother’s side. She and Houdini him memorabilia from her collection,
such as her father’s watch chain (pic-
tured in the book and still in the Lip-
pincott family), a candid photo of her
friend Enrico Caruso, and letters from
Houdini (which have been sold, but are
depicted in the book). Because she was
Jewish, her life becomes increasingly
precarious under the Third Reich, as the
Nazis increased the restrictions on her
person, such as requiring her to use her
birth name Dora Ch[awa] Herrmann in
lieu of her stage name. At the time the
final letter was written on September
25, 1939, she was 86.5 years old in dire
financial need and poor health, so we
can safely assume that she did not sur-
vive to suffer the coming horrors of the
Holocaust, but at present her exact date
of death is not known. Of the 341 pages,
120
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
or magic societies, for example. I believe and life in the context of the Jewish
this was a good editorial choice: strip faith, a subject that has not been suf-
out all the fat and just leave the essential ficiently covered in previous works on
story, which gives a more modern view the magician, and that may give us an-
of Houdini to the contemporary reader other approach to examine the reasons
without bogging them down with every behind his artistic and life choices. We
single escape or river jump, mostly ap- are not talking here of a book that at-
preciated by readers of this magazine. tempts to examine Houdini’s psyche, as
A few errors have crept in (like the other sources, from the 1970s onwards,
date of the beginning of the Magicians’ have tried to, yet I believe the book’s ap-
Club – it is 1911 rather than 1913), but proach could open a source of discus-
these are inconsequential and may only sion and investigation for historians
interest the most obsessed Houdini and amateurs of the Houdini lore.
historian. The book contains numer- While not indispensable to the
ous photographs, all of which already knowledge of Houdini’s life and career,
known and generally from public col- this is an excellent title for a more gen-
lections (most from the Library of eral view of Houdini and his myth and
Congress) and the print quality of the I’m sure you will want to add it to your
volume is excellent, from high–quality collection.
paper to the design and print: no cheap • Houdini – the Elusive American • Adam
“print on demand” here. Begley • Yale University Press, New Haven,
What I found of most merit in 2020 • 232 pages • 14.6 x 21 cm • hardcover•
$26 • https://www.jewishlives.org/books/
this book is the vision of Houdini’s feats
houdini
the episode to refresh your memory on ence or study; but for those with a more
his approach to magic collecting. substantial collection, a large propor-
One of the things that David said tion of these objects remain in storage,
and that particularly impressed me, is in boxes, drawers, dark rooms. A very
his concept to use the collection as a small number of collectors sometimes
vehicle for storytelling. Briefly (but, as present part of their possessions in pub-
I repeat, please check the talk), David lic displays or lend them to museums
extracts stories from the objects in his for sporadic exhibitions, but these can
collection and presents these stories to be counted on the fingers of two hands.
visitors of his magic museum, explain- What could the average collector take
ing why some performers, or some lo- from David’s concept and bring it to
cations resonate more with him, taking their collection?
the audience to a journey in magic past, Every magic object has a story,
and into magic that is or was meaning- and when a group of heterogeneous
ful to David Copperfield. objects are together, they can provide a
This idea made me think, deeply, richer story, in which some individual
once again, on how a collector could items are more interesting than oth-
share his collection with the world at ers: a publicity photo of a long–dead
large, and how he or she could make magician is less interesting than, say, a
these magic artefacts meaningful for box this magician used on stage. If the
other people. What do you do with your photo were to show the same box, then
collection? From a personal point, and the story created by the two objects be-
from what I see many friends do, we of- comes more interesting, worth narrat-
ten accumulate objects or papers for our ing. But there are also objects in people’s
own pleasure: sometime we decorate a collections that cannot tell a story as
home, an office, or a den; other times such: books or newspaper clippings, for
we use part of our collection for refer- example. Unless these objects are spec-
tacularly important (like a copy of The a life of work and continued fine–tun-
Discoverie of Witchcraft), then they can ing, how to narrate a story in a succinct
only tell a story when grouped together: yet emotional way, with the story be-
they may perhaps talk of the collector ing either a magic trick presented si-
who acquired thousands of books, or lently on a stage, or a talk about his first
of the magician who has written these visit to Tannen’s Magic Shop. I’ve seen
books. Of course, books and clippings many presentations about magic his-
allow the student to learn about the his- tory, mostly as talks or conferences for
tory of magic, allow him or her to create magicians, and only very few speakers
a story to be shared with the public. If were engaging and able to provide the
you have a library of – let’s say – chil- essential information in a way that was
dren books with magicians, I’m sure you not academic or just boring. I therefore
could create an engaging story about it, believe that to share a magic collection
perhaps talking about the pictures, the with a “storytelling” approach, one re-
tricks shown, the apparatus, the cloth- ally needs to work hard on the narrative,
ing; or maybe even explain why you are on the story – and perhaps even on the
attracted to that niche subject. personality of the speaker. A good per-
But I personally see some prob- former is often better suited to this type
lems with collectors using Copperfield’s of presentation than a non–performer.
approach to the sharing of their own But once we have decided on the
collections. First of all, to tell a story, in narrative to accompany our collection,
an engaging way, is difficult! It is a skill we generally encounter another prob-
that must be honed, rehearsed and that lem, that is: where to present it? Of
requires work. Then, many collectors course, a story could be written, objects
and – especially – historians are often could be put in a room with labels next
attracted by the minutiae of a subject, to them narrating part of the story, cre-
by the exact shade of the paint used by ating a path where a captive audience is
Thayer, by the time of the day a can- let loose to read and admire the single
did photo may have been taken, by the objects. Having attempted this experi-
manufacturer of the trick represented ment, I’m not sure it is the best way to
in a magic poster. These details may be present the collection: in a museum
important for the collector, the curator there are distractions; the audience may
or the restorer of an object, but they not follow the order laid out (just think
are hardly of any interest in the biggest of a cluster of people in front of an ex-
scheme of the narrative of the life of a hibit: you are bound to have somebody
magician, or by the narrative of a pres- skip it and look at another object, thus
entation. Heck! I see that myself when breaking the narrative of the story you
I present my talks about Chefalo: some have so hardly worked on). You may
of the things I find fascinating do not think that perhaps by having a “guide”
progress the story, and I should bet- or a recorded path is the way forward,
ter remove them or keep them for an- and that surely is, but of course in this
other occasion. David Copperfield is a case you get more challenges. I think
great storyteller and has learned after that for magic, having a live “storyteller”
124
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
(or guide) is essential, but there is a big a mini museum to display your collec-
difference between the collector himself tion, would you be happy and have the
and a guide who has learnt the patter necessary resources and time to create a
and is repeating it for a group of peo- business to give you the satisfaction to
ple. I’m sure that what Copperfield does share your collection?
when he takes tours around his collec- While I believe that David Cop-
tion has a different feel than the same perfield’s approach to his museum and
presentation given by somebody else, his collection is the ideal one to pro-
even if they repeat the exact same patter. mote the history and the art of magic,
There is a difference between the person as preserved in one’s collection, unfor-
who has a passion for his/her subject, tunately there are many challenges to
and years of gathering the collection, replicate this model outside the physical
and those who are only repeating – as structure that Copperfield has created.
skilled as they may be – somebody’s But magicians are well known to do
else story. Another thing that must be the impossible, and I would like to see
considered is that stories are tied to the how this model could be adapted, on a
sensibility of the storyteller: while a smaller scale, by fellow collectors. Per-
story may resonate with a person for a sonally, I have some ideas that I hope to
number of reasons (and here I’m think- be able to test out in the real world once
ing particularly of Copperfield’s own this Covid emergency is no more – hop-
experience at Tannen’s), they may be to- ing I will still be relatively middle–age!
tally alien to somebody else, like a tour But what do you think? What would
guide who never had the same emotions you do?
COURTIER. There are cases,
as the storyteller.
when one studies the history of magic,
Of course, it is almost always im-
that people are taken by the enthusiasm
practical to have the collector act as a
of a discovery to make it bigger than
guide in a museum that can temporar-
what it really is. We have all seen exam-
ily host the exhibition, and in this case
Copperfield’s setup is the perfect en- ples of this, the most common being the
vironment, where the museum is in a attempt to associate the identity of the
property owned (?) by the owner of the mysterious “S. W. Erdnase,” the author
collection, with his own team around, of The Expert at the Card Table, to vari-
and with no other event going on (or ous characters, most of whom (if not all
planned to replace a temporary magic of them) never had anything to do with
exhibition). This is of course impossible this influential book. Many years ago,
for almost any other collector: would my dear friend Gianni Pasqua, “Roxy,”
you open your own home to groups of made an astonishing statement about
tourists to visit your collection, with you the first mention of the “bottom deal”
guiding them around? I am not talking technique, which has since been taken
about a few magic friends visiting once for granted and is treated as the original
a year, but about a self–supporting busi- source of this information. The “bottom
ness model. Even if your home is such deal” is the technique where the bottom
as to allow some rooms to be used as card of the deck is dealt during a card
125
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
127
This copy belongs to: Roberto Mansilla ([email protected]) - 18900
early presentations: nothing too excit- how many methods there are to ac-
ing, but I always found it funny to read complish it (I estimate about 20 major
Selbit’s exhortation to “bring your own variants). For your edification, I’ve put
saw” to the theatre to cut the lady in on the previous page an image from
two yourself. I like to visualize these a Chinese book, Magic of All Nations
men getting into a theatre with a lum- (萬國魔術) by Zhu Hongyu (朱宏譽),
berjack’s saw and not wanting to leave first published in 1955, which shows
it at the cloakroom: “no, no! t’is me own an interesting variant, being a mix of
saw and I’ll cut the woman up meself to- the Selbit/Goldin method (but with
night! I don’t trust the magic man, me!” the clever use of the table which neither
The fall–down of the publicity of originally used) and one of Zati Sun-
The Magic Circle had BBC Radio Suf- gur’s principles for the “thin sawing.”
folk call me for an interview about the Many happy returns to this incredible
illusion, and we briefly talked about illusion and may your saw never slip!
MP
128