Lesson 6 - Hbo
Lesson 6 - Hbo
Performance Appraisal
The supervisors measure the pay of employees and compare it with targets and plans.
The supervisor analyses the factors behind work performances of employees.
The employers are in position to guide the employees for a better performance.
It is said that performance appraisal is an investment for the company which can be justified by
following advantages:
Through performance appraisal, the employers can understand and accept skills of
subordinates.
The subordinates can also understand and create a trust and confidence in superiors.
It also helps in maintaining cordial and congenial labor management relationship.
It develops the spirit of work and boosts the morale of employees.
Following are the tools used by the organizations for Performance Appraisals of their
employees.
Ranking
Paired Comparison
Forced Distribution
Confidential Report
Essay Evaluation
Critical Incident
Checklists
Graphic Rating Scale
BARS
Forced Choice Method
MBO
Field Review Technique
Performance Test
Ranking Method
The ranking system requires the rater to rank his subordinates on overall performance.
This consists in simply putting a man in a rank order. Under this method, the ranking of
an employee in a work group is done against that of another employee. The relative
position of each employee is tested in terms of his numerical rank. It may also be done
The “whole man” is compared with another “whole man” in this method. In practice, it is
very difficult to compare individuals possessing various individual traits.
This method speaks only of the position where an employee stands in his group. It does
not test anything about how much better or how much worse an employee is when
compared to another employee.
When a large number of employees are working, ranking of individuals become a difficult
issue.
There is no systematic procedure for ranking individuals in the organization. The ranking
system does not eliminate the possibility of snap judgements.
This is a ranking technique where raters are required to allocate a certain percentage of
rates to certain categories (eg: superior, above average, average) or percentiles (eg: top
10 percent, bottom 20 percent etc). Both the number of categories and percentage of
employees to be allotted to each category are a function of performance appraisal
design and format. The workers of outstanding merit may be placed at top 10 percent of
the scale, the rest may be placed as 20 % good, 40 % outstanding, 20 % fair and 10 %
fair.
The limitation of using this method in salary administration, however, is that it may lead
low morale, low productivity and high absenteeism.
Employees who feel that they are productive, but find themselves in lower grade (than
expected) feel frustrated and exhibit over a period of time reluctance to work.
Under this method, the manager prepares lists of statements of very effective and
ineffective behavior of an employee. These critical incidents or events represent the
In this system, a large number of statements that describe a specific job are given. Each
statement has a weight or scale value attached to it. While rating an employee the
supervisor checks all those statements that most closely describe the behavior of the
individual under assessment. The rating sheet is then scored by averaging the weights
of all the statements checked by the rater. A checklist is constructed for each job by
having persons who are quite familiar with the jobs. These statements are then
categorized by the judges and weights are assigned to the statements in accordance
with the value attached by the judges.
Managers commit mistakes while evaluating employees and their performance. Biases and
judgment errors of various kinds may spoil the performance appraisal process. Bias here refers
to inaccurate distortion of a measurement. These are:
Therefore, while appraising performances, all the above biases should be avoided.
Although these terms are often used interchangeably, reward and recognition systems
should be considered separately. Employee reward systems refer to programs set up by
a company to reward performance and motivate employees on individual and/or group
levels. They are normally considered separate from salary but may be monetary in
nature or otherwise have a cost to the company. While previously considered the
domain of large companies, small businesses have also begun employing them as a tool
to lure top employees in a competitive job market as well as to increase employee
performance.
As noted, although employee recognition programs are often combined with rewards
programs they retain a different purpose altogether. They are intended to provide a
psychological—rewards a financial—benefit. Although many elements of designing and
maintaining reward and recognition systems are the same, it is useful to keep this
difference in mind, especially for small business owners interested in motivating staffs
while keeping costs low.
In designing a reward program, a small business owner needs to separate the salary or
merit pay system from the reward system. Financial rewards, especially those given on a
regular basis such as bonuses, profit sharing, etc., should be tied to an employee's or a
group's accomplishments and should be considered "pay at risk" in order to distance
them from salary. By doing so, a manager can avoid a sense of entitlement on the part
of the employee and ensure that the reward emphasizes excellence or achievement
rather than basic competency.
Merit pay increases, then, are not part of an employee reward system. Normally, they
are an increase for inflation with additional percentages separating employees by
competency. They are not particularly motivating since the distinction that is usually
made between a good employee and an average one is relatively small. In addition, they
increase the fixed costs of a company as opposed to variable pay increases, such as
bonuses, which have to be "re-earned" each year. Finally, in many small businesses
teamwork is a crucial element of a successful employee's job. Merit increases generally
review an individual's job performance, without adequately taking into account the
performance within the context of the group or business.
There are a number of different types of reward programs aimed at both individual and team
performance.
Variable Pay
Bonuses
Bonus programs have been used in American business for some time. They usually
reward individual accomplishment and are frequently used in sales organizations to
encourage salespersons to generate additional business or higher profits. They can also
be used, however, to recognize group accomplishments. Indeed, increasing numbers of
businesses have switched from individual bonus programs to one which reward
contributions to corporate performance at group, departmental, or company-wide levels.
According to some experts, small businesses interested in long-term benefits should
probably consider another type of reward. Bonuses are generally short-term motivators.
By rewarding an employee's performance for the previous year, they encourage a short-
term perspective rather than future-oriented accomplishments. In addition, these
programs need to be carefully structured to ensure they are rewarding accomplishments
above and beyond an individual or group's basic functions. Otherwise, they run the risk
of being perceived of as entitlements or regular merit pay, rather than a reward for
outstanding work. Proponents, however, contend that bonuses are a perfectly legitimate
means of rewarding outstanding performance, and they argue that such compensation
can actually be a powerful tool to encourage future top-level efforts.
Profit Sharing
Stock Options
Previously the territory of upper management and large companies, stock options have
become an increasingly popular method in recent years of rewarding middle
management and other employees in both mature companies and start-ups. Employee
As more small businesses use team structures to reach their goals, many entrepreneurs
look for ways to reward cooperation between departments and individuals. Bonuses,
profit sharing, and stock options can all be used to reward team and group
accomplishments. An entrepreneur can choose to reward individual or group
contributions or a combination of the two. Group-based reward systems are based on a
measurement of team performance, with individual rewards received on the basis of this
performance. While these systems encourage individual efforts toward common
business goals, they also tend to reward under-performing employees along with
average and above-average employees. A reward program which recognizes individual
RECOGNITION PROGRAMS
For small business owners and other managers, a recognition program may appear to
be merely extra effort on their part with few tangible returns in terms of employee
performance. While most employees certainly appreciate monetary awards for a job well
done, many people merely seek recognition of their hard work. For an entrepreneur with
more ingenuity than cash available, this presents an opportunity to motivate employees.
Nor will the entrepreneur be far off the mark. As Patricia Odell reported, writing
for Promo, "Cash is no longer the ultimate motivator." Odell cited data from the Forum
for People Performance Management and Measurement at Northwester University—
which had discovered that non-cash awards tend to be more effective; the exception
was rewarding increasing sales. "The study found," Odell wrote, "that non-cash awards
programs would work better than cash in such cases as reinforcing organizational values
and cultures, improving teamwork, increasing customer satisfaction and motivating
specific behaviors among other programs."
In order to develop an effective recognition program, a small business owner must be
sure to separate the program from the company's system of rewarding employees. This
ensures a focus on recognizing the efforts of employees. To this end, although the
recognition may have a monetary value (such as a luncheon, gift certificates, or
plaques), money itself is not given to recognize performance.
Recognition has a timing element: it must occur so that the performance recognized is
still fresh in the mind. If high performance continues, recognition should be frequent but
cautiously timed so that it doesn't become automatic. Furthermore, like rewards, the
method of recognition needs to be appropriate for the achievement. This also ensures
that those actions which go farthest in supporting corporate goals receive the most
attention. However, an entrepreneur should remain flexible in the methods of
recognition, as different employees are motivated by different forms of recognition.
Finally, employees need to clearly understand the behavior or action being recognized.
A small business owner can ensure this by being specific in what actions will be
recognized and then reinforcing this by communicating exactly what an employee did to
be recognized.
Recognition can take a variety of forms. Structured programs can include regular
recognition events such as banquets or breakfasts, employee of the month or year
recognition, an annual report or yearbook which features the accomplishments of
employees, and department or company recognition boards. Informal or spontaneous
recognition can take the form of privileges such as working at home, starting late/leaving
early, or long lunch breaks. A job well done can also be recognized by providing
additional support or empowering the employee in ways such as greater choice of
assignments, increased authority, or naming the employee as an internal consultant to
other staff. Symbolic recognition such as plaques or coffee mugs with inscriptions can
also be effective, provided they reflect sincere appreciation for hard work. These latter
expressions of thanks, however, are far more likely to be received positively if the source
SUPPLEMENTAL READINGS/REFERENCES:
1. Explain how money can both be an economic and a social medium of exchange? As a
student, how do you use money as a social medium of exchange?
2. Think of a time when you assessed, either formally or informally, someone else’s level of
performance and found it deficient by your standards. To what did you attribute the
reasons for the inadequate performance? Were you engaging in any attributional
tendencies? How could you avoid doing so?