Name: Michaella Pagadura

2-A Psych

ETHICS MIDTERM PAPER:

“My Home Ethical Standards: An analysis”

Ethics, also referred to as ethical philosophy, is a branch of philosophy that involves system of
principles, guarding, and proposing concepts of wrong or right behavior. How is it possible to know what
is morally correct when cultures differ so greatly? There is a gray area when it comes to moral dilemmas,
which can occasionally make it difficult to resolve issues surrounding these. It was interesting reading
the questions on chapter one's quick test on ethical beliefs. I found many of the questions realistic, well
put, and can say that I agree that this test can make oneself wrestle with where they stand and not
where they believe to stand ethically. Ultimately, regardless of the background, there are hard moral
foundations within yourself to stand on and make smart conscience decisions based on your moral
standings. The New Oxford American Dictionary defines ethics as "moral principles that regulate a
person's or group's behavior," therefore in an ideal situation, ethics ought to be the deciding factor in
any choice. Ideally, all decisions should be made totally based on ethics if ethics are the principles that
one uses to guide their actions. This is regrettably not always the case. Making an ethical choice presents
a few challenges, especially for leaders. First, various people may have different definitions of ethics. For
instance, what I consider ethical is based on my religious and spiritual convictions. Others, however, may
base their sense of ethics on the law or their own perception of what is good or wrong. In general, I do
think there are some actions that we can all agree are morally right or wrong. For instance, most
individuals are aware that killing someone or stealing from them are bad things to do. Because of these
variations in how people view ethics, it can be challenging to have the same ethical expectations of
others as one has of oneself. Additionally, there are instances in which a leader may find it simpler to act
unethically to obtain an instant advantage or satisfy the demands of others. Leaders who steal money or
engage in other shady business practices are examples of this.

Making moral judgments is often the objective for most leaders. I genuinely think that most of the
time, CEOs do act morally for the benefit of their company or organization. In certain situations, it may
be simpler to make an immoral choice, but when faced with such a choice, a leader's genuine character
is put to the test. Making the simpler choice isn't always the best course of action for a leader personally
or for the group/company. Although not all choices are morally righteous, one's moral convictions serve
as a guide for their actions and decision-making. So, while making decisions, ethics do (and should) play
a significant part. My personal ethics are shaped by my religious and spiritual views, as was already
established. I was imbued with a believe in God and His teachings, as per the Bible, from an early age
since I was raised in a highly Christian home. A spiritual journey and a connection with God are personal
and cannot be readily taught or given by others, I am finding as I become older. I will thus be the first to
say that as I continue my own path with God, my personal ethics are continuously evolving. I no longer
have the same views on some acts that I may have formerly considered to be acceptable. As an excellent
leader, I have a lot of love for the organizations I am a part of, especially S.M.A.R.T. My love for the
organization keeps me committed to it. But because of this enthusiasm, when things don't go the way, I
want them to, I could speak in a way that other people would find rude. Others may have been
disrespectful because of my tone, my voice volume, or the things I've said. Personally, I think it's wrong
to treat others with contempt. I may not have intended to insult them, but that is what I have done.
While I formerly justified my "lashing out" by saying that it was fueled by my "burning love for the
organization," I now recognize that this behavior is inappropriate. Regardless of how I feel, I should
constantly strive to treat others with respect as a leader and as a person. I was also able to see how my
actions were affecting the other members of my executive board, who started to believe it was OK to act
in a similar way. Values like empathy, truthfulness, compassion, and justice are part of my own code of
ethics. I usually give these four ideals the greatest thought when choosing, along with how my choice
could benefit the company. To constantly help improve a company or someone else is my ultimate
objective. These four principles usually aid me in making well-rounded, moral judgments. I've previously
hinted at how respect influences my choices. I think about the decision and how I may convey it to
others, or I think about other facets of people's life and how this decision might affect them. I try to
make sure that every choice I make respects other people. I also try to make decisions that are always
truthful. I ask for aid when I need it. I make every effort to be as open and honest about whatever
decisions I make and their justifications. I am always eager to explain my thinking and am receptive to
criticism. When I'm making a choice, my sympathetic side also comes out. I make a sincere effort to
consider the needs and circumstances of others in most situations. Because S.M.A.R.T. might be
demanding, for instance, I constantly think about the other areas of our members' life and how my
actions can burden rather than benefit them. Finally, I try to ensure that my choices are equitable for all
parties. I would much sooner inconvenience or treat someone unfairly than someone else. Concerning
personal ethics, communication is essential. As was already said, various people have different ethical
standards. As a result, I find it far more challenging to attempt to comprehend others' ethical
justifications than to express my own. I'm usually a straightforward person. I'm quick to the point,
especially when I'm a leader. I just share my beliefs and values with others as a result. Additionally, I
express my ethical principles through my behavior. If I make judgments based on my ethical convictions,
others should be able to infer my own values from my actions. Overall, I place a lot of value on making
moral decisions. As a leader, I am aware that my choices and actions have an impact on how people see
right and wrong. My goal is to constantly offer a positive example for others and being ethical is the
cornerstone of that example. In terms of ethics, the proverb "actions speak louder than words" is true.
By my activities, I hope to demonstrate to others what my moral principles are. It might be challenging
at times because I may allow my emotions to affect my decision-making, but ultimately, doing the right
thing for the benefit of others is what matters most to me. It is challenging to make moral judgements
consistently. Most decisions must be taken considering economic, professional, and social influences,
which can provide challenges to our moral objectives and obscure or muddle moral dilemmas. Making
ethical decisions is difficult since there are frequently numerous conflicting interests and ideals to
consider. Other times, important details are unclear or unknown. Since many decisions are likely to
benefit some individuals at the expense of others, the decision-maker must be skilled at forecasting the
likely outcomes of various options and must prioritize opposing moral demands. An ethical individual
frequently decides to go above what the law calls for and what the law permits. Ethics offers a set of
idealistic standards that aids in decision-making and offers justifications for fair decisions. Resolutions
involving faith and ethical issues frequently clash. While many faiths encourage ethical decision-making,
others frequently do not recognize an individual's entire range of ethical choices. Most faiths reject or
restrict specific conduct that they may not deem to be morally acceptable, such as particular sexual
orientations or habits. Many people base their moral or ethical judgments on their religious or spiritual
beliefs.
 In conclusion, morality is unquestionably among humanity's top needs. Furthermore, a world devoid of
ethics would have been a chaotic and horrible one. Additionally, without ethics, mankind cannot grow.
The young in the community need to be well-aware of ethics. A moral compass is necessary for people
to navigate life. Many people may believe they can manage without one, but it's likely that they are
egoists and do have a principle that directs them. It's okay for me to do anything if it makes me feel
good, happy, like it, and I can live with it. Until one starts to think about it, that may appear like a
desirable premise by which we may make judgments. If the idea served as a universal guide, it would
and does result in numerous disputes. What is needed in a moral code is something that will enable
humans to live with one another in an order rather than in chaos of self-interested action. A person
would pick which theory to use to support the decision they were making in a way that would give them
the outcome they most desired if they were inclined to suppose that multiple of the theories might be
applied in a single life. This strategy is consequentialist in nature and places emphasis on the result for
the decision maker. In other words, EGOISM would be the true guiding concept. Therefore, someone
who claims to use one principle on one occasion with one scenario and then another principle on
another occasion would be employing whatever makes them happy and produces the result they want.
The most important aspect is that this person wants the desired result. The SELECTION of a theory is
based on personal preference, but it need not be random. Each individual weighs the benefits and
drawbacks, as well as the strengths and weaknesses, and makes a decision that is compatible with their
ideals. Everyone should become more conscious of their core beliefs and which theory best aligns with
what they perceive as the good by thinking about the various theories and evaluating how they might be
applied to the many scenarios and challenges concerning medical practices and organizations. Then,
such a theory would provide moral direction. When deciding what is ethically right to do, people should
have some sort of guiding principle. Sometimes acting morally upright may not result in happiness for
the performer other than knowing that they were right. The only person who believes performing what
is right must always make the actor happy is the egoist. You could be right in assuming that most
individuals in the world are ethical egoists (EE), meaning they put their own interests first. But perhaps it
is now or never for humanity to develop, mature, and employ reason to choose what each of us will live
and die for. What will the GOOD principle be that will be used to moral judgments? Do you want to
make decisions that put yourself first or do you want to THINK and come up with a principle that is
compatible with your beliefs that you will use to make moral decisions and that you will try to get others
to use as well so that moral disputes may be resolved? Because there is no universality or consistency in
EE, it lacks reasoning. Since no EE in a disagreement has agreed to a concept of the GOOD, it cannot
resolve moral disputes. Violence and power struggles as a result. To resolve disputes and prevent
bloodshed, the United Nations operates under the utilitarian premise. Other principles exist. The DIVINE
COMMAND concept is followed by religious extremists that use violent and terrorism-related
techniques, such as Islamicists. The international society doesn't seem to want to embrace this idea as
the foundation for resolving moral disputes. What strategy will the world employ to try to stop the
violence? So, which rule are we to follow to guide our lives and give them purpose and worth via our
decisions? Each person decides. In philosophy, an effort is made to think about the principle that would
serve best, the principle with the fewest drawbacks, and, ideally, to find a principle that is the best to
meet the demands of the current global situation and is correct in setting people on a path of behavior
that serves the fundamental values of the human community. People frequently reflect on their life
when they are faced with the prospect of death. Few people evaluate something's value solely on how
much they own. Most individuals believe that the way they treat others and are treated themselves is
considerably more important than having material stuff. In hindsight, one's moral sensibility is therefore
recognized as one of the most crucial aspects of a person's existence. Is doing the right thing more
significant than whether I have as much as I could or if I am as happy as I could be? Responsible moral
actors should investigate the justifications for the ideas they hold about what is ethically right to come
to a decision about what is the right thing to do. People should examine their views to ascertain the
underlying concepts and values that support the notion that one ethical guideline should take
precedence over another. The rational and responsible person would provide justifications for what they
believe to be morally proper as well as arguments in support of the claims they would make when taking
a stance on a moral problem or trying to conclude about what is morally right. People should analyze
and evaluate the moral reasons in a continuous process. All arguments presented in favor of opinions
espoused and forced upon others must be critically analyzed. The critical assessment would check to
determine whether the reasoning was consistent and logical as part of the continual process of inquiry
into the fundamental thinking and the way in which principles are employed. Revisions may be required
if the arguments do not seem to be well-reasoned or to be adequately supported, and the original
argument may even need to be abandoned in favor of one that was either inspired by the inquiry itself
or resulted from it. The new justification for the new viewpoint then becomes a candidate for further
critical analysis. It is said that this ongoing process is dialectical. Humans are maturing as morally
responsible individuals when they engage in the process of moral inquiry, even down to the level of
questioning the most fundamental principles and values that are being applied. Humans are defining
and growing the moral side of their personalities and moral personhood while they accomplish this. The
conclusions or viewpoints reached via the process of dialectical inquiry and review will be the focus of a
continuing process of review and critique in which people will weigh all of their options. Humans will
utilize their intellectual abilities to study and re-evaluate moral theory and ethical principles if they are
conscious, have a fundamental sense of morality, and can reason. Over time, it has become clear that
the solutions to moral issues that have been pushed on human groups in our planet need to be revised.
Imposing moral absolutes on all peoples of the globe is not the best way for the inhabitants of planet
Earth to reach a shared understanding on how to deal with moral issues and find answers to
conundrums. It wouldn't be acceptable either to agree that all moral thinking and ethical concepts are
equally valuable and useful. The dialectical method does disclose weaker arguments, separating them
from stronger ones that are more helpful, appropriate for the tasks at hand, and applicable to situations
as they arise. Hope for individual and societal progress in moral maturity can be found in the open-
ended and continuing process of moral inquiry. We discover more about morality itself, about what and
how we value, and about how we may approach resolving our conflicts and quandaries via the process
of continual moral inquiry. By following that process, people may come to an understanding of the
values, ideas, and lines of thinking that are most conducive to human settlement of moral and physical
problems without the use of any kind of violence. There are many distinct aspects that come into play
when one is presented with a situation that requires an ethical or morally linked choice or action. The
sort of ethical or moral mentality that somebody has may be greatly influenced by society, culture,
media exposure, and personal circumstances. Technology, politics, and economy could also have an
effect on a person's ability to make moral judgments as well as on whether or not they live ethically or
morally. There are moments when it seems that our culture is less inclined to live by ethics and morals.
We could specifically live in a society of uncertainty and mistrust for this reason. When one thinks about
ethics and morals, they frequently picture values and standards imparted in children. Numerous studies,
however, have demonstrated that these values are shaped and formed even beyond infancy. These
principles can be influenced by a variety of circumstances, including those related to society, culture,
technology, politics, economy, the effects of others, biology, and situational awareness. These various
factors that affect our ethics and morality and the reasons behind our choices are summarized and
accumulated in the annotated list below. Which values will direct your choices is entirely up to you.
Although you can and will receive counsel from others, the choice is ultimately yours. Choose carefully.
For Plato, helping someone make good decisions and select what is actually pretty good was the
fundamental goal of philosophy.