STS READINGS No. 2
STS READINGS No. 2
STS READINGS No. 2
Module 2
Chapter 1: The Nature and Relationships of Science, Technology, and
Society
Characteristics of Science and Technology: The Scientific Method
Scientific method
A process or sequence of activities undertaken to gather information and to come to conclusions
about the natural world.
- The prefix "super" means "above." So supernatural means "above (or beyond) the natural." The
toolbox of a scientist contains only the natural laws of the universe; supernatural questions are outside
their reach.
- Man has the inherent capacity to observe the things around him. Careful observation could make
one recognize that there is a problem or a phenomenon that is worthy of further attention and study.
After initial observations, details not previously observed can be determined using instrumentation.
Search and review of related literature (books, scientific journals, online sources, etc.) should also
be undertaken to learn more about the problem.
2. Formulation of Hypothesis
(Use of inductive reasoning to provide a tentative solution to the problem)
- Scientists use generalizations to come up with a hypothesis, which is an intelligent guess that is a
possible explanation for a natural event. The hypothesis is presented as an actual statement and must
be testable.
- In the development and proving of hypotheses, scientists use inductive and deductive logic.
Example: a person tasted a green mango and found it sour and slightly tangy to the taste buds. Then
he subsequently tasted 24 other mangoes and found the same result. Based on the these 25
samplings, he may then conclude that all green mangoes are sour and tangy to the taste.
Inductive logic thus proceeds from several specific observations to a generalization - Cell Theory,
the Theory of Biological Evolution by Natural Selection, and the theory of plate tectonics, all these
are generalizations arrived at by inductive reasoning.
Example:
After testing 25 green mangoes and finding them sour and tangy, one may hypothesize that the next
mango he will taste will be sour and tangy. This kind of reasoning is used to formulate a new
hypothesis after a generalization.
The scientists may further formulate a new hypothesis using deductive logic. If 25 green mangoes
are sour and tangy, then the next green mango I will taste should be sour and tangy. If indeed the
mango tasted sour and tangy, then the validity of the original generalization has gained greater
probability (or credibility). Thus, the scientific procedure; or science progress by the interplay of
inductive and deductive reasoning.
3. Testing of Hypothesis
(Experimentation and Conduct of Further Observations)
- In this phase, the scientist uses deductive reasoning involving the “if, then” logic. Foresight or the
capability to predict what will happen next is necessary to guide the scientist on how to go about his
experiment. The scientist must come up with an experimental design that will make him generate
meaningful results. Usually a “control” or “control group” is set up side by side with the experimental
group. This contains all components and undergoes all parts of the experiment except for the factor
being tested.
- In any experiment, we can really only test one thing at a time. So we try to control all the variables
except one that we will change.
Independent variable = the variable that you change during the experiment.
Dependent variable = the variable that you observe changes in (depends on the independent
variable)
4. Experimentation
5. Drawing of Conclusion
(Analysis of Data to Determine whether the Hypothesis is Supported or Not, Publication of Results)
- Data are results of the experiment which may lead one to accept or reject the hypothesis initially
formulated. These should be observable and objective. Mathematical data are usually presented in
tabulated and graphical forms and may require statistical analysis to confirm validity or significance.
- A conclusion is the answer to the problem and based on a supported hypothesis. Science is a
progressive process such that the conclusion of one experiment can lead to the hypothesis for
another experiment. The results that do not support the hypothesis may be used by scientists to
formulate another hypothesis to be tested.
- Conclusions from many different but related experiments may lead to the development of a
Scientific Theory, a general concept about the natural world.
- A theory, therefore, is a hypothesis that has been repeatedly and extensively tested and always found
to be true. However, no theory in science is ever absolutely and finally proven. Scientists should be
ready to alter or even abandon their most cherished generalizations when new facts contradict them
(Keeton and McFadden, 1983).
1. J. Watt’s invention of the condensation steam engine that was a prime mover of transport and
industry, was made possible by the concept of latent heat discovery of J. Black.
2. London’s synthetic dye industry came from the accidental of aniline dye magenta by W. Perkins
attempt to synthesize quinine.
3.Hermann von Helmholtz’s study on sound waves inspired A. Graham Bell to create the telephone.
4. The electrical industry owes much to the works of H.C. Oersted on magnetic fields produced by
electric currents which was used by A. Volta who invented electrical batteries.
5. The dynamo, alternator and transformer were made based from the works of M. Faraday on
interrelated concepts of motion, magnetism and electricity.
Scientific Processes
Intellectual Honesty - This attitude allows a scientist to recognize the work done by other scientists
before him. This attitude is also shown by reporting data truthfully.
Curiosity - This attitude/quality-curiosity-enables a scientist to try to discover more about the things
around him.
Risk taker, confident and persistent - These attitudes are very important because it enables a scientist
to continue a project despite obstacles and failures.
Objectivity - A scientist must be objective in declaring results of his/her experiments and judgment
is based on observable phenomena and not influenced by emotions or personal prejudices.
Precision - A scientist must always consider the precision of his work if it forms a pattern or
repeatedly occurring in nature. Lack of precision to a work would mean inconsistency.
Responsibility - The moral, social, and personal responsibility and accountability of a scientist to all
of his works must be observed.
Collaboration and Readiness to reach consensus - “No Man is an Island.” All people need others
criticism for us to know if this can be widely accepted or not. Two minds are better than one.