Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Francis Feng

Professor Dan Kellum

International Writing Workshop II

3.21.2020

Further Analysis on Eve Babitz

Eve Babitz is a writer who would sacrifice meaning-making for pure amusement. In her

writing ethics, fun is imperial; satire is essential; and flippant judgments are there to spice up the

first two. It is common that her swarm of wisecracks and Los Angeles lingo flies around and

dilutes storylines and claims, making them hardly visible, yet the entirety of her essay,

nevertheless, never fails to arouse a trenchant feeling in the readers—It feels like she casted a

spell on her words to make them talk beyond literal limitations. How does she keep her work

from being simply a game of words or a clever gimmick that attracts Americans who just want to

feel the nostalgia?

The more I read Babitz, the more I see the answer. After reading her “No Onion,” a

collection of shorter, subtitled passages coalesced under one title, I came to realize a little more

about the driving forces behind her writing. “No Onion” is about American comic books and

magazines, teen romances and kisses, onions and garlic, but most importantly, about the odors

that linger in Eve Babitz’s memories. “They seemed to understand that the consequence of

Archie saying ‘no onions’ would result in an ‘out-of-gas’ car with hearts coming up from the

roof.” (Babitz, 69) Again, opening with an ambiguous sentence exclusively validated through a

comic book character, Babitz flirts with her readers, challenging them to guess the subject matter

of this prose. While I did not grow up in the U.S., I assume those who grew up consuming
American pop culture can get her point right away: it is about kissing, kissing without eating

onions beforehand because it is just unacceptable—what a piece of tacit and classical American

teen knowledge.

“No Onion” ironically details Babitz’s onion-phobia moments—how she felt obliged to

abide the rule—and the anomalies she encountered growing up that made her doubt the rule’s

credibility, such as the skater boy in her high school who didn’t mind kissing her after having hot

dogs with onions. It is almost like her memoir about first loves—in fact, it is—but she seems to

have said more. The No Onion Rule itself might be intellectually insignificant and childlike, but

what it represents is the pop culture’s bigger-than-imagined influence on teenagers. While we

think Babitz’s writing merely functions to recount the cultural scene of her time, she reflects—

through the most minor and unexpected lenses—on the determinants of the cultural mentality she

shares with her even-aged. However, Babitz never tells us what to think: the trenchant feelings

her work arouse in us would, eventually, turn into understandings, except that they are not from

her but from us. This might also explain why she intends to keep her work elusive—she wants us

to have the story.

As readers, we can take Eve Babitz’s work merely as a nostalgic stunt that transmits us

back to our youthful past or to the passionate land we all have dreamed to live on, but we can

also choose to dig deeper and see the critical thinking, dissecting the entire golden era, behind

those jokes.

WORKS CITED
———————————————————————————————————————
Babitz, Eve. I Used to Be Charming. “No Onion”, page 69 - 75. New York Review Books, 2019.

You might also like