Geddes - Chapter - 1 2019
Geddes - Chapter - 1 2019
INTRODUCTION
1
2 The dynamics of regional migration governance
tional migration and mobility that are included within regional cooperation
frameworks. We distinguish between ‘mobility’ and ‘international migration’
because there are important instances of regional cooperation to promote
mobility or free movement between participating states, which introduces
a legal and political distinction between those who move between states within
the regional grouping (labelled mobility) and those who move from outside
this regional setting (labelled international migration). We also conceptualise
states as non-monolithic entities, formed by different components, which have
a variety of ideas, identities and interests, which could sometimes lead to
apparently contradictory positions on openness and closure to migration and
mobility.
The focus for the analyses contained within this book can be quite simply
stated – the dynamics of regional migration governance – but this point of
reference actually requires much closer examination. Analyses of regional
cooperation and integration have more commonly focused on economic- and
trade-related aspects of regional integration (for an overview see Börzel and
Risse 2016). This is not surprising, as these aspects have typically been to the
fore as key driving forces in regional cooperation and integration. Scholars of
international migration have tended to devote less attention to regional inte-
gration, although this is beginning to change (e.g. Lavenex et al. 2016; Geddes
and Scholten 2016; Margheritis 2018). For example, there is clear evidence
reported in this book of attempts to include migration and mobility, including
schemes – or aspirations to develop such schemes – for intra-regional mobility
in key regional groupings.
This introduction has two main tasks. The first is to break down this book’s
focus into its core components in order to specify more clearly what is meant
by ‘regional’, ‘migration’ and ‘governance’. Looking at each in turn provides
the basis for a common vocabulary that allows the various chapters in this book
to focus on the dynamics of cooperation (and non-cooperation) on migration
and mobility in various types of regional setting. Its second task is to specify
questions that help inform the common framework, which are addressed in
each chapter and to which we return in the concluding chapter. Before under-
taking these tasks, we begin with a brief exposition of the relationship between
borders, boundaries, states and international migration to locate the analysis
within the wider context of analyses of the global politics of migration.
borders of states that can be found at land, air and sea points of entry. At these
territorial borders, would-be migrants can be asked to present a claim for entry
and decisions are then made about whether access to the state territory be
granted, for what purpose and for what duration. While most crossings of state
borders occur in a regular fashion, it is also well known that considerable effort
can also be made by would-be migrants and those who seek to facilitate their
movement, such as people smugglers, to avoid state controls and cross borders
irregularly. The wider analytical point is that it is the borders and boundaries
of states that define international migration. An obvious extension of this
argument is that states and their borders come in many different forms. Not
only have there been important historical changes in the location and presence
of state borders across the world, but it is also very clearly evident that the
capacity of states to regulate their borders and entry to their territory can vary
significantly.
It is not only these territorial borders and boundaries that play a key role in
defining international migration. There are other kinds of borders that can also
give meaning to international migration as a social and political process. In
particular, organisational borders and boundaries more typically found within
states rather than at their external frontiers can play a key role in defining inter-
national migration. In major destination countries, there are important relations
between migration, social rights and the provision of welfare services as key
organisational boundaries. This can work in two ways: migrants contribute
through taxation and employment to help sustain welfare provision while
migrants and their families also use welfare services. The purpose of this book
is not to delve into this debate about migration and the welfare state, but to
observe that these important organisational boundaries are ‘internal’ to states,
but clearly play an important role in defining international migration as a social
and political issue. Again, we must add the proviso that there is huge interna-
tional variation in the provision of social rights and welfare. Some countries
have highly developed welfare states while others struggle to guarantee basic
social protections for their own citizens, never mind migrants.
To the impact of social rights and welfare states that tend to have a strong
national resonance we can also add the role played by labour markets. Labour
markets are often not strictly ‘national’, as they can cross national borders
in complex production, supply and value chains. It is, however, clearly the
case that international migration is powerfully defined by its relationship to
employment and labour markets. How these labour markets are organised and
how they relate to wider patterns of economic change plays an important role in
shaping international migration. By this is meant economic effects articulated
through employment and the labour market can shape definitions of ‘wanted’
and ‘unwanted’ migration and migrants, defined, for example, by skills or edu-
cational levels. There can also be tensions, paradoxes and even contradictions.
4 The dynamics of regional migration governance
enhance their capacity to regulate access to their territory. In both cases, what
may ostensibly seem to be ‘national’ questions acquire a regional resonance
linked both to the dynamics of migration itself and to the ways in which it can
impact upon inter-state relations. Interdependence does not necessarily impel
cooperation. International migration in the context of interdependence in the
Middle East has played a more coercive role in relations between states (see
Chapter 8). In North America, President Trump targeted Mexico and Mexicans
for harsh anti-immigration rhetoric, threatened to tear up agreements with the
Mexican government if it didn’t control migration and demanded – without
success – that Mexico pay for his infamous border wall (Chapters 9 and 10).
In Southeast Asia and Europe, boat arrivals by migrants and asylum-seekers
strained ideas about regional solidarity in the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations (ASEAN) and the European Union (EU), respectively (see Chapters
5, 6 and 11).
To further develop these points, we now unpack the three core elements of
this book’s analysis, beginning with the ‘regional’ component of migration
governance.
WHAT IS A REGION?
GOVERNANCE
The term governance is much used, although often with more attention paid to
the adjectives attached to it (multi-level, experimental, regulatory, pluricentric,
networked, deliberative to name six) than to the meaning of the term itself.
Governance is generally seen as ‘a signifier of change’, by which could be
meant change in the meaning, processes, conditions or methods of governing
(Levi-Faur 2012: 7). Peters (2012: 19–22) recognises the ‘ambiguity’ of the
concept before noting that ‘successful governance’ has four functional require-
ments: goal selection with these integrated across all the levels of the system;
goal reconciliation and coordination to establish priorities; implementation;
and feedback and accountability as individuals and institutions must learn
from their actions.
We develop an understanding of governance that is related to the specificity
of international migration. This understanding proceeds from the basic obser-
vation that international migration happens because other things change, i.e. it
is epiphenomenal. These changes may be economic, political, social, demo-
graphic or environmental. For example, relative inequalities of income and
wealth can be key drivers of international migration. So too can be political
factors linked, in particular, to the effects of conflict either within or between
states. These economic and political factors can be powerfully affected by the
existence of migration networks linking would-be migrants to those who have
already migrated. This imparts a social dimension to international migration.
It is also the case that younger people are more likely to migrate than older
people and that the demographic structure of a population can interact with
economic and political change as well as with the social effects of migration
networks to stimulate and channel international migration. Finally, the effects
of environmental and climate change can interact with people’s livelihoods to
cause people to migrate. The point that we can take forward from this is that
migration governance is necessarily related to a much wider set of economic,
political, social, demographic and environmental conditions.
Migration governance centres on the various roles and actions of organi-
sations. These may be organisations with specific migration responsibilities
or for which migration is part of their remit. These governing organisations
must try to make sense of what is going on ‘out there’ and also, on the basis
of the understandings that they develop, decide what to do next. Migration
governance as an organisational process can thus be understood to possess
Introduction 9
a dual meaning as, first, efforts to conceptualise the effects of change in under-
lying social systems. As already noted, these are economic, political, social,
demographic and environmental. Second, governance systems will seek to
steer, manage or coordinate these effects. This steering, management and coor-
dination can and does involve regional organisations of varying types and with
varying degrees of involvement in migration governance. As noted earlier, this
governance occurs within a multi-level system within which states continue to
play a key role but within which we can see increased involvement by regional
organisations. It is also important to note that multi-levelness has a dimension
related to the spatial allocation of authority across the sub-national, national,
regional and international levels. It is also possible to observe changes in the
actor composition of governance networks with involvement by public and
private actors. Finally, the development of regional cooperation signifies the
presence of more – not fewer – organisations in the migration governance
field. This reinforces the point that migration governance is an organisational
process defined by the relationship between governing organisations and the
environment within which they operate. These governing organisations must
seek to respond to pressures from their environment but, through their actions,
can also play a powerful role in shaping their environment.
The role that governance organisations can play in shaping their environ-
ment leads to a final observation about governance. There can be a tendency to
explore the effects of international migration on regional governance systems
and to understand international migration as a challenge to these systems. It is,
however, the case that governance systems, including those at regional level
can play a powerful role in defining the challenge or problem that is to be
addressed and also, through their wider economic and political effects, pow-
erfully affecting the drivers of international migration. We need to understand
governance systems, including those at regional level, as potential shapers of
their environment and not merely as passive or reactive.
The comparability of regions depends not only on the research questions but
also on the discursive and practical contexts in which the (social) construction
of the region occurs (De Lombaerde et al. 2010; Geddes 2012; Börzel and
Risse 2016). This book centres on migration-related discourses and practices
that lead to migration governance outcomes.
To facilitate comparison, our approach focuses on the essential character-
istics of regions, governance and regional migration governance. At the same
time, these characteristics capture specific regional dynamics that differentiate
them from non-regions. As previously noted, regions are political and social
constructs that aim to promote cohesiveness. Regions can then interact with
10 The dynamics of regional migration governance
other regions with regard to migration governance as well as with the interna-
tional governance level.
These interactions can form part of diffusion processes. As a consequence
of interdependence, regions could look to other regions for examples of
problem-solving, to legitimise certain decisions or because they consider that
behaviour appropriate. Diffusion is a social process in which regions are active
agents that choose which practices they will or will not emulate or which prior
example they will or will not follow. They could also choose to promote their
own practices. Diffusion processes rarely lead to institutional isomorphism,
that is, to complete convergence or adoption of specific migratory measures.
More often they lead to selective adoption, adaptation and/or transformation
(Risse 2016). Persistent divergence in patterns of regional migration govern-
ance means that the regional system can be located within an international
migration ‘regime complex’ comprising loosely coupled systems of institu-
tions without an overall architecture to structure the whole set. This can lead
to migration governance regimes coexisting in the same issue-area without
a clear hierarchy (Keohane and Victor 2010: 4).
The understanding of governance developed in the previous section helps us
to move beyond state-centric approaches to include non-state actors as active
policy-making agents and, thus, to explore the link between the processes
of regionalism and regionalisation in multi-level contexts. In governance
processes governmental and non-governmental actors interact and take part in
formal and informal institutions and policy-making, including coalitions and
policy networks (see Börzel 2016).
The analyses that follow do not consider any particular regional organ-
isation either as a model or template for others or as a unique case to be
understood only in relation to its own specificities. Rather, regional migration
governance experiences can be assessed alongside each other to establish
an analytical dialogue. Assessment of the scope for diffusion of ideas and
practices within and between regions can help to develop understanding of dif-
ferences, commonalities and interactions. This approach also builds from the
social nature of regional constructs, recognising their pluralism, and analysing
interactions between the national, regional and international levels. By doing
so, we develop a truly global perspective of both the discursive and practical
context of migration and mobility to address a set of key questions that we
now specify.
The chapters in this book address a series of questions that analyse not only the
dynamics of regional migration governance, but also the interactions that occur
within and between regional migration governance systems and the types of
Introduction 11
migration governance they produce. We are conscious too that debates about
migration governance are nested within much wider debates about the state
and international relations in each of our regions. Contributors are sensitive to
the traditions within each region from which regional governance processes
emerge, as well as the factors at regional level that can generate cooperation,
tension or conflict on issues related to international migration.
The first set of questions relates to the role of regions in migration gov-
ernance. Our contributors analyse the relevance and position of migration in
regional cooperation and integration and the extent to which aspects of mobil-
ity and migration have been included in specific regional governance systems.
This means identifying the factors that can account for the incorporation of
mobility and migration within specific regional settings, the form that coop-
eration has taken and the forms or types of migration that have been the focus
for cooperation. We see markedly ‘uneven’ governance with both more formal
and informal structures and processes.
The second set of questions relates to structures and actors/action. All con-
tributors share an interest in the relationships between structures, processes,
actors and the context in which they act. Regional migration governance is
a multi-actor field comprising, for example, national governments, regional
organisations, business groups, employers, trade unions, international organ-
isations, civil society organisations, think tanks and academic researchers.
Power in migration governance is not equally distributed. Some actors – more
often than not at state level – wield considerably more power and influence in
regional migration governance systems. The chapters in this volume are sen-
sitive to both the relationships between structures and actors and to the power
relations that these encapsulate.
The third set of questions relates to the comparative dimension. Across
time and space, the chapters in this book compare regions, not only to
understand similarities and differences, but also to understand how, why and
with what effects ideas and practices about migration governance can travel
between regions. One thing to emphasise from the outset is that the EU is not
taken-for-granted as a model or template. The EU arose from highly specific
conditions and ideas about the ‘sharing’ or ‘pooling’ of national sovereignty
that are not evident in other regions. It would be Eurocentric and limiting to
use the EU as the standard by which we judge cooperation and integration in
other regions. It is true that ideas and practices can travel. It is also true that
regions may look to the EU. But, as we also see, this can include viewing the
EU as a negative example, as occurred in South America during the 2000s.
To begin with, in Chapter 2, the book provides a conceptual overview of
the dynamics of regional migration governance. Lavenex and Piper survey
approaches that they label ‘top down’ and ‘bottom up’ and by doing so reveal
the multi-level and multi-actor complexities of regional migration governance.
12 The dynamics of regional migration governance
the reach and efficacy of regional structures. Rother shows how in Southeast
Asia only limited spaces for regional migration governance have been opened
and also makes an important distinction between governance of, for and by
migration and migrants that highlights the need to be attentive to power rela-
tions in regional migration governance. Chapter 12 extends the geographic
focus north to explore developments in the post-Soviet space and Eurasian
region. Leonov and Korneev show how Eurasian regionalism has served to
re-integrate the previous Soviet space because of the economic, social and cul-
tural significance of migration in the region. Chapter 13 concludes the book by
drawing lessons from the chapters and considering the significance of regional
migration governance for the global governance of migration.
NOTE
1. While our understanding of mobility is broadly informed by the mobility turn in
social sciences and the social implications of diverse forms of mobility, here we
refer specifically to mobility within an institutional framework of regional integra-
tion processes (see Lavenex et al. 2016). For the mobilities paradigm see Sheller
and Urry (2006) and Cresswell (2010).
REFERENCES