BioscienceDiscovery 17
BioscienceDiscovery 17
net/publication/334416767
CITATION READS
1 60
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Checklist of Angiosperms of Bhor Taluka, Pune District, Northern Western Ghats of Maharashtra, India, Based on Herbarium Records View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Ravi Pandurang Patil on 12 July 2019.
Crude Fat (C Fat) Content: The crude fat content amount of crude fat extracted per 2g of sample was
was estimated using soxhlet extractor with measured and calculated as percent of dry matter by
chloroform: methanol (70:30) as a solvent The the following equation.
Crude Protein (CP): The nitrogen content (N) was determined by micro-Kjeldahl method (Bailey, 1967) and
the crude protein (CP) was expressed as N x 6.25.
Total Ash Content: Total ash content was estimated following the A. O. A. C. (1970) methods and total ash
obtained per 2g of sample and was calculated as percent of dry matter (DM).
Total Ash % = Weight of ash X 100
Weight of sample
Acid Insoluble Ash (AIA): AIA content was estimated following the A. O. A. C. (1970) methods The AIA
was determined per unit weight of the sample used for ashing and calculated it as per cent of DM.
AIA % = Weight of ash X 100
Weight of sample
NFE and Total Carbohydrate (TC): The Nitrogen free extract was obtained (on dry matter basis) when the
sum of crude protein, crude fat, crude fibre and total ash was subtracted from the factor 100.
Phosphorus: The amount of phosphorus was measured following Fiske and Subba Rau (1925) as described
by Oser (1979).
Gross Energy: The chromic acid oxidation method described by O’shea and Maguire (1962) was followed
to determine gross energy (GE) and the amount of GE was determined and calculated in Kcal per g of sample
using the following equation:
GE (Kcal/g DM) = ml 1.5 N K2Cr2O7used to oxidize 1g sample
(23.39 – 0.069 P + 0.000226 P2)
Where p is the crude protein content.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 5.6%, 35%, 15%, 10%, 24.09%, 59.09%, 3.65%,
The proximate and mineral composition of treated 0.92%,0.20% respectively and was high While, in
and control cultivated non-legumes were studied and control Maize crop the concentration recorded with
results were recorded. In treated Maize crop the 20.70%, 18.75%, 4.9%, 33.29%, 14.23%,
concentration of dry matter, crude protein, crude fat, 9.39%,22.28%,58.12%, 3.12%, 0.69%,0.16%
crude fibre, total ash, acid insoluble ash, nitrogen respectively and was found to be low comparatively.
free extract, total carbohydrate, gross energy, In treated Jowar crop the concentration of dry matter,
calcium, phosphorus recorded with 22.30%, 20.31%, crude protein, crude fat, crude fibre, total ash, acid
Table 1: The Proximate and mineral Analysis of cultivated treated non-leguminous fodder crops.
Table 2: The Proximate and mineral Analysis of cultivated control non-leguminous fodder crops.
60
50
40
30
Zea mays (treated)
20 Zea mays (control)
10
0
Graph.1: The proximate composition (%) of Zea mays (L).treated and control.
70
60
50
40
30 Sorghum bicolor (treated)
20 Sorghum bicolor(control)
10
0
Graph.2: The proximate composition (%) of Sorghum bicolor (L.) treated and control.
45
40
35
30
25 pennisetum typhoides
20 (treated)
15
pennisetum typhoides(control)
10
5
0