Note: 

There seems to be evidence that the Jesuit Order had a heavy role to play in the
affairs of Germany during World War II. Here is the hidden history of the attempted
extermination of the Jews who kept the Seventh-Day Sabbath (see the quote from Francis
Xavier below). Some interesting things to note:

I. THE NAZI PARTY WAS STRUCTURED AFTER THE JESUITS

 It was Adolf Hitler who said, "I can see Himmler as our Ignatius of Loyola."
—Adolf Hitler, “Libres Propos”  (Paris: Flammarion, 1952): 164.
o Heinrich Himmler, Reichsführer of the Schutzstaffel, was closely
associated with the Jesuits through his father (Josepth) and
brother. Himmler was one of the most powerful men in
Germany and was also a prominent occultist who incorporated
esoteric symbolism and rituals into the Nazi Schutzstaffel (S.S.).
Occultism had a heavy role to play in Nazi Germany because it
is through spirit communication that they receive ‘instruction’
and ‘guidance’ from supposed disembodied spirits of the dead.
o Ignatius De Loyola (b.1491–1556) was the founder and Superior
General of the Society of Jesus (aka ‘Jesuit Order’) and was a
contemporary of Martin Luther (1483-1546) which means that
the Jesuit Order was founded during the midst of the Great
Protestant Reformation. The main purpose for its existence is to
purge the world of Protestant and ‘liberal’ ideologies that
denounced the supremacy of the bishop of Rome and to
reestablish universal papal supremacy as confirmed by Pope
Paul III in the year AD 1540. The term ‘liberal’ that they use
does not necessarily refer to a political party the word ‘liberal’
used by the Jesuits refers to anything that doesn’t adhere to
the laws and teachings of the Papacy.
 “Hitler spoke of Heinrich Himmler, commander-in-chief of the SS, as ‘my
Ignatius Loyola’… In many respects, the SS was indeed modeled on the
Jesuits, and made deliberate use of Jesuit techniques in such spheres as
psychological conditioning and education [this is known as Ignatian ‘spiritual
exercises’]. But the Jesuits themselves had derived much of their structure and
organization from the still older military-religious-chivalric orders like the
Knights Templar and the Teutonic Knights (Deutschritter). Himmler himself
conceived of the SS as an Order in precisely this sense, and saw it, quite
specifically, as a reconstituted Deutschritter — a modern equivalent of the
white-mantled knights with black crosses who, seven hundred years before,
had spearheaded an earlier Germanic Drang nach Osten (‘drive to the East’)
into Russia.”
—Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, & Henry Lincoln in “The Messianic
Legacy”, p. 152. [Authors of "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail"]
o Here the authors connect the Knights Templars with the Jesuits
and this statement is also verified under the writings of Grand
Commander Albert Pike, in his textbook “Morals and Dogma”
which is one of the highest esoteric sources you can get today
on the ‘secret doctrine’ of esoteric knowledge:

“...The TEMPLARS were unintelligent and therefore unsuccessful

JESUITS.”
—Albert Pike (33rd Degree), “Morals and Dogma of the
Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry”, p.817,
819
//Above: Albert Pike (b.1809 - 1891), 33rd degree Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite
Freemasonry

 History reveals that Hermann Rauschning, the former national-socialist

chief of the Danzig government, quoted Adolf Hitler in 1939 about his
comments on the Nazi Party’s hierarchical structure which affirms what
Hitler said in “Libres Propos (1952)”:
o Rauschning quoted Adolf Hitler:
“‘I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits… Until now, there
has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the
hierarchical organization of the Catholic Church. I transferred
much of this organization into my own party… I am going to let
you in on a secret… I am founding an Order… In my ‘Burgs’ of
the Order, we will raise up a youth which will make the world
tremble…’”
—Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist chief of
the government of Dantzig: “Hitler m’a dit” (Ed. Co-
operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 SS).
 According to Rauschning, Hitler stopped his speech
and abruptly said, “I can’t say anymore”. What
Rauschning was referring to with, “we will raise up a
youth” was the group called “the Hitler Youth” which
was a paramilitary youth organization divided into
two subgroups which recruited from boys aged 10
to 18. The Hitler Youth was formed earlier in 1922
and was given more prominence after Hitler took
the political reins of Germany in 1933 up until the
end of the Second World War in 1945.
 It is very interesting to note that the Jesuits always
start with the youth. Did you know that the
ecumenical movement, which attempts to
reconnect all of Christendom and the non-Christian
world into the fold of the Papacy in one form or
another, was pioneered under the Young Men’s
Christian Association (Y.M.C.A.)? The Y.M.C.A.
(Young Men's Christian Association) is founded in
England by John Mott, a Freemason, which later
went into the U.S.A. The Y.M.C.A was a pioneer for
the global ecumenical movement.
//Above: Photograph of Walter Schellenberg (b.1910 - 1952)
  According to Chief of the Nazi Sicherheitdienst, Walter Shellenberg,
“The SS had been organized by Heinrich Himmler according to the principles
of the Jesuit Order. The rules of service and spiritual exercises prescribed by
Ignatius de Loyola constituted a model which Heinrich Himmler strove
carefully to copy. Absolute obedience was the supreme rule; every order had
to be executed without comment [perinde ac cadaver].”
—Walter Schellenberg, as quoted in World War Two in the News:
"Death of Heinrich Himmler."
 According to Franz von Papen, the powerful Nazi Vice-Chancellor of
the Nazi Reich said,
“The Third Reich is the first world power which not only acknowledges but
also puts into practice the high principles of the papacy (emphasis in
original)”.
—Franz von Papen, as quoted in Robert d’Harcourt, Franz von Papen
l’homme à tout faire," (L’Aube, October 3, 1946).

//Above: A. Hitler and F.V. Papen together on the "Day of Potsdam” (Opening of the Reichstag
by a state ceremony at the Garnison Church in Potsdam), 21 March 1933.

 When the historian P. D. Stuart had heard Franz Von Papen’s claims,
he responded with this statement:
"Now, are we to regard it as sheer coincidence that von Papen was not only
Vice-Chancellor of the Nazi party, but also a member of the Catholic Center
Party in the parliament of the Weimar Republic (1919-1933)? And is it
merely coincidental that von Papen was also given the honorary dignity
 (title) of Papal Chamberlain by Pope Pius XI; or that the said honour was
revived on July 24, 1959 by Pope John XXIII?"
—P. D. Stuart, “Codeword Barbêlôn: Danger in the Vatican” (London:
Lux Verbi, 2008): 206.
 The Historian P. D. Stuart continued to ask questions concerning the
connections that the Nazi party had with the Jesuits of Rome:
o “Why were Hitler’s closest advisers Jesuits? Why did Mr. Hitler
admire and copy the Jesuits? Are these just mere coincidences?
Or are we once again seeing the Jesuits playing the chameleon,
and eclipsing the wiles of Ovid?...let us not mince words here,
Hitler, the faithful ‘son of the Catholic Church,’ was the Pope’s
Malleus Papa—his hammer.”
—P. D. Stuart, Codeword Barbêlôn: Danger in the Vatican
(London: Lux Verbi, 2008): 202.
 See quote from Spanish dictator Francisco Franco,
below.
 “[SS General Heinrich] Himmler owned an extremely large and excellent
library on the Jesuit Order and for years would sit up late studying the
extensive literature. Thus he built up the SS organization according to the
principles of the Jesuits. The Spiritual Exercises of Ignatius of Loyola served as
the foundation; the supreme law was absolute obedience, the execution of
any order whatsoever without question. Himmler himself, as Reichsfuhrer of
the SS, was the general of the order. The structure of leadership was
borrowed from the hierarchical order of the Catholic Church. He took over a
medieval castle, the so-called Wevelsburg at Paderborn in [Roman Catholic]
Westphalia, and had it repaired so that it might serve as a kind of ‘SS
monastery’. Here the general of the order would hold a secret consistory once
a year attended by the top leadership of the order. They would take part in
spiritual exercises and practice sessions in concentration [as does every
professed Jesuit, while led by a guide, studies ‘The Spiritual Exercises’ of St.
Ignatius Loyola once a year for thirty days, much of the time spent in silence
and “meditation”]. In the large meeting hall each member had his particular
chair with his name engraved on a silver plaque. No doubt these mystical
leanings of [Bavarian-born] Himmler go back in part to his attitude toward
the Catholic Church, which might be called ‘love-hate;’ and in part to his
strict upbringing by his [Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor] father with its stern
Catholic code of conduct, from which he fled into... [Loyola’s] romanticism...”
{27} [Emphasis added]
—Walter Schellenberg, 1950 SS/SD Nazi General “The Labyrinth:
Memoirs of Walter Schellenberg”, Eric Jon Phelps, Vatican Assassins III
(page 1037)
 Furthermore, it is important to know that the Jesuits have a two-
doctrine structure:
o “The TEMPLARS, like all other Secret Orders and Associations,
had TWO DOCTRINES, one CONCEALED and reserved for the
Masters, which was [1] Johannism; the other public, which was
the [2] Roman Catholic.”
—Albert Pike (33rd Degree), “Morals and Dogma”, p.817
o "Thus, from the beginning, the knights of the Temple [TEMPLAR]
served two doctrines. One was concealed from all except the
leaders and certain trusted members; the other, publicly stated
and practiced for the sake of appearances, conformed with the
regulations of the Church.”
—Manly P. Hall, Orders of the Quest, The Holy Grail (Adept
Series), p.32
o “The tendencies and tenets of the [TEMPLAR] Order were
enveloped in profound mystery, and it externally professed the
most perfect orthodoxy. The Chiefs alone knew the aim of the
Order; the subalterns followed them without distrust.”
— Eliphas Levi
 The Jesuits of Rome follow the teaching of, “Perinde
Ac Cadaver” → “in the manner of a corpse”.
o “The Order of the Temple [TEMPLARS] was indeed constituted of
seven ‘exterior’ circles dedicated to the minor mysteries, and of
three ‘interior’ circles corresponding to the initiation into the
great mysteries.”
— Jean Robin
o “The TEMPLARS were unintelligent and therefore unsuccessful
JESUITS.”
—Albert Pike (33rd Degree), ”Morals and Dogma”, p.819
o Adolf Hitler also incorporated this two-doctrine structure into
the Nazi Party. This is why he says one thing and does another.
It is Jesuit politics. This is why Hitler claimed to be a Catholic yet
killed and persecuted them at the same time if he saw the
means fit to secure the ends of “the will of the Lord” he thought
he was doing.
 "Persecution of the Catholic Church in Germany has
been directed only against those elements which did
not entirely submit to the ever-increasing
centralization of authority in Church and State...With
the extinction of liberal Catholicism and the
imprisonment of liberal Protestant leaders, Vatican
absolutism was triumphant. Of supreme satisfaction
 to the Jesuit Catholic faction was the dissolution of
Protestantism in Germany."
—Leo II Leo Herbert Lehmann, Behind the
Dictators. (New York Agora Publishing Co. 1942)
p44.49.55
 You have to understand that the Society of Loyola
(“the Jesuit Order”), was created (via papal bull) in
order to eradicate Protestantism by any means
necessary through a fanatic sense of loyalty to the
Order under perinde ac cadaver (referring to the
Jesuits’ obedience “in the manner of a corpse”).
II. ADOLF HITLER AND CATHOLICISM

 "Adolf Hitler,  son of the Catholic Church, died while defending Christianity.
It is therefore understandable that words cannot be found to lament over his
death, when so many were found to exalt his life. Over his mortal remains
stands his victorious moral figure. With the palm of the martyr, God gives
Hitler the laurels of Victory".
—Spanish dictator (Francisco Franco, Knight of the Order of Christ)
published on the 3rd of May 1945, the day of Hitler's death.
("Reforme", 21st of July 1945.)
o See the quote by P.D. Stuart above.
 Hitler’s father, Alois Hitler (1837-1903), and his mother, Klara Hitler (1860–
1907), were both Catholics. Adolf Hitler’s mother was a devout Catholic and
went to church regularly. His father, Alois, was baptized as an infant into
the Roman Catholic Church and he remained Roman Catholic his entire life.
A young Adolf Hitler received religious instruction from Catholic schools.
Because of his Catholic upbringing, Hitler was heavily inclined and
convinced that he was doing God’s work on planet Earth as evident from
his writings:
o “And so I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with
the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the
Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord. … Therefore, I am
convinced that I am acting as the agent of our Creator. By
fighting off the Jews, I am doing the Lord’s work. … I believe
today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the
Almighty Creator.”
–Adolf Hitler, Chapter 2, “Mein Kampf”.
o In 1941, Adolf Hitler wrote to General Herhad Engel and
said,
“I am now as before a CATHOLIC and will always remain so.”
 —John Toland (1992). “Adolf Hitler”. New York: Anchor
Publishing, p. 507.
o "Hitler was also ready to discuss with the Bishop his views on the
Jewish question: ‘As for the Jews, I am just carrying on with the
same policy which the Catholic church has adopted for fifteen
hundred years, when it has regarded the Jews as dangerous and
pushed them into ghettos etc., because it knew what the Jews
were like. I don't put race above religion, but I do see the danger
in the representatives of this race for Church and State, and
perhaps I am doing Christianity a great service.’"
—“The Nazi Persecution of the Churches" by J.S. Conway,
p. 25-26, 162.
III. A JESUIT PRIEST HAD GHOST WRITTEN HITLER’S BOOK “MEIN KAMPF”

 According to former Catholic Priest L. H. Lehmann, "It was a priest, Father

Staempfle, not Hitler, who really wrote Mein Kampf."
—L. H. Lehmann, “Behind the Dictators: A Factual Analysis of the
Relationship of Nazi-Fascism and Roman Catholicism” (1942): 26.
//Above: Photograph of Fr. Bernhard Stempfle (1882-1934) in 1928.

 "The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of the Catholic Zentrum,
only five years before, but most of the objectives cynically revealed in 'Mein
Kampf were already realized; this book, an insolent challenge to the western
democracies, was written by the Jesuit Father Staempfle and signed by Hitler.
For—as so many ignore the fact—it was the Society of Jesus which perfected
the famous Pan-German programme as laid out in this book, and the Fuhrer
endorsed it."
—Edmond Paris, The Secret History of the Jesuits (Chino, CA: Chick
Publications, 1975).
 Otto Strasser, a former member of the Early Nazi party and a
contemporary of Hilter, wrote, “Good Father Staempfle, a priest of great
learning, editor of a paper at Miessbach, spent months rewriting and editing
Mein Kampf. He eliminated the more flagrant inaccuracies and the
excessively childish platitudes. Hitler never forgave Father Staempfle for
 getting to know his weaknesses so well. He had him murdered by a ‘special
death squad’ on the night of June 30, 1934.”
—Otto Strasser, "Hitler and I" (London 1940), p. 49
o Stempfle was found murdered during the purge known as ‘the
Night of the Long Knives’ on the 30th of June, 1934 at the
command of Hitler using S.S. (“Schutzstaffel”) forces. Hitler
instigated a 'blood purge' of the S.A. (“Sturmabteilung”)
leadership which exterminated dozens of S.A. leaders. After this
event, the S.A. no longer played a major political role in Nazi
affairs (“SS | History, Meaning, & Facts”, Encyclopedia
Britannica).
o Otto Strasser’s brother, Gregor Strasser (the figurehead of the
leftist-leaning Strasserist faction of the Nazi Party), was also
murdered during this night.
IV. THE JESUIT ORDER HAVE VOWS TO DESTROY ‘HERETICAL’ GROUPS SUCH AS ‘THE
JEWS’ WHICH MATCHES NAZI-ANTISEMITISM

 It must be understood that the Jesuits of Rome (Catholic Faith Militant),

who were led by Ignatius De Loyola as “general”, was established to
counter the Protestant Reformation along with any other dissenting party.
Ignatius De Loyola (1491–1556) was a contemporary of Martin Luther
(1483–1546).
 “Between 1555 and 1931 the Society of Jesus was expelled from at least 83
countries, city states and cities, for engaging in political intrigue and
subversion plots against the welfare of the State, according to the records of
a Jesuit priest of repute…Practically every instance of expulsion was for
political intrigue, political infiltration, political subversion, and inciting to
political insurrection.”
—J. E. C. Shepherd (Canadian historian), “The Babington Plot: Jesuit
Intrigue in Elizabethan England” (Toronto, Canada: Wittenburg
Publications): 12:
o It is historical fact that the Jesuits were so notorious throughout
the world for their meddling in state affairs as the Jesuit priest
of repute had already noted that they were banned in so many
countries including Catholic Nations.
 An excerpt from the infamous ‘Jesuit Oath’:
“My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among
Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your
own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to
be a reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the
Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a
Protestant, and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their
pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy
Religion and the Pope; and EVEN TO DESCEND SO LOW AS TO BECOME A
JEW AMONG JEWS, that you might be enabled to gather together all
information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope…
Now, in the presence of Almighty God, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed
Michael the Archangel, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the holy Apostles St.
Peter and St. Paul and all the saints and sacred hosts of heaven, and to you,
my ghostly father, the Superior General of the Society of Jesus, founded by St.
Ignatius Loyola in the Pontificate of Paul the Third, and continued to the
present, do by the womb of the virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus
Christ, declare and swear, that his holiness the Pope is Christ's Vice-regent
and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout
the earth; and that by virtue of the keys of binding and loosing, given to his
Holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings,
princes, states, commonwealths and governments, all being illegal without
his sacred confirmation and that they MAY SAFELY BE DESTROYED. I do
further declare that the doctrine of the churches of England and Scotland, of
the Calvinists, Huguenots and others of the name Protestants or Liberals TO
BE DAMNABLE and they themselves damned who will not forsake the same. I
furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, MAKE
AND WAGE RELENTLESS WAR, secretly or openly, AGAINST ALL HERETICS,
PROTESTANTS and LIBERALS, as I am directed to do, TO EXTIRPATE and
EXTERMINATE THEM FROM THE FACE OF THE WHOLE EARTH; and that I
will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay,
strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and
wombs of their women and crush their infants' heads against the walls, in
order TO ANNIHILATE FOREVER THEIR EXECRABLE RACE. That when the
same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the
strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of
the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may
be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be
directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of
the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus [Jesuit Order].”
—Oath was taken from, ”Subterranean Rome” by Carlos Didier, which
was translated from the French and published in New York in 1843. Dr.
Alberto Rivera escaped from the Jesuit Order in 1967, and he describes
his Jesuit oath in exactly the same way as it appears in this book,
“Semper idem: always the same”. [The Jesuit Oath of Induction is also
recorded in the Congressional Record of the U.S. (House Bill 1523,
Contested election case of Eugene C. Bonniwell, against Thos. S.
Butler, Feb. 15, 1913, pp. 3215-3216)].
 “For professing faith contrary to the teachings of the church of Rome, history
records the martyrdom of more that one hundred million people. A million
Waldenses and Albigenses [Swiss and French Protestants] perished during a
crusade proclaimed by Pope Innocent III in 1208. Beginning from the
establishment of the JESUITS in 1540 to 1580, nine hundred thousand were
destroyed. One hundred and fifty thousand perished by the Inquisition in
thirty years. Within the space of thirty-eight years after the edict of Charles V
against the Protestants, fifty thousand persons were hanged, beheaded, or
burned alive for heresy. Eighteen thousand more perished during the
administration of the Duke of Alva in five and a half years.”
—“Brief Bible Readings”, p. 16
 “The papacy acknowledges that they have done just this when they said, ‘The
church has persecuted. Only a tyro [novice] in history will deny that…
Protestants were persecuted in France and Spain with the full approval of the
church authorities. We have always defended the persecution of the
Huguenots and the Spanish Inquisition.’”
—“Western Watchman”, a Roman Catholic periodical, December 24,
1908.
o Read this for more historical details on Papal
Genocides: Martin White's answer to What happened to the
Waldensian Protestants?
//Above: Painting of St. Bartholomew’s massacre of the Huguenots by the painter  François
Dubois.

 “Of eighty popes in a line from the thirteenth century on, not one of them
disapproved of the theology and apparatus of Inquisition. On the contrary,
one after another added his own cruel touches to the workings of this deadly
machine.”
—Peter de Rosa, Vicars of Christ: The Dark Side of the Papacy (New
York, NY: Crown Publishers, 1988): p.175
 “From the birth of Popery in 606, to the present time, it is estimated
[conservatively] by careful and credible historians, that MORE THAN FIFTY
MILLIONS of the human family have been slaughtered for the crime of heresy
by popish persecutors, an average of more than forty thousand murders for
every year of the existence of Popery.”
—John Dowling, “History of Romanism,” pp. 541, 542. New York: :
Imperial Jewels 1655 AD the Waldensian [Protestant] Church is
Massacred at Piedmont, Italy by Catholics under the sinister influence
of Jesuits

“Alas! alas! these poor people were undone. They [Waldensian Protestants]
had received under their roof the executioners of themselves and their
families. The first two days, the 22d and 23d of April, passed in peace, the
soldiers sitting at the same table, sleeping under the same roof, and
conversing freely with their destined victims … At last the blow fell like a
thunderbolt. At four of the clock on the morning of the 24th April the signal
was given from the Castle of La Torre. But who shall describe the scenes that
followed? On the instant a thousand assassins began the work of death …
LITTLE CHILDREN WERE TORN FROM THE ARMS OF THEIR MOTHERS, and
DASHED AGAINST THE ROCKS; or, more horrible still, they were held betwixt
two soldiers, who, unmoved by their piteous cries and the sight of their
quivering limbs, tore them up into two halves. Their bodies were then thrown
on the highways and the fields. Sick persons and old people, men and
women, were burned alive in their own houses; some were hacked in pieces;
some were bound up in the form of a BALL, and precipitated over the rocks
or rolled down the mountains … Some were slowly DISMEMBERED, and FIRE
APPLIED TO THE WOUNDS to staunch the bleeding and prolong their
sufferings; some were FLAYED ALIVE; some ROASTED ALIVE; others were
DISEMBOWELLED; some were horribly and SHAMEFULLY MUTILATED, and of
others the FLESH AND BRAINS WERE BOILED AND ACTUALLY EATEN by
these cannibals.”
– By Jean Leger, “L'Histoire Générale des Eglises Evangeliques des
Vallées de Piemont ou Vaudoises”
 This massacre is also noted by prolific writer, J.A. Wylie:
“Little [Waldensian] children were torn from the arms of their mothers,
clasped by their tiny feet, and their heads dashed against the rocks; or were
held between two soldiers and their quivering limbs torn up by main force.
Their mangled bodies were then thrown on the highways or fields, to be
devoured by beasts. The sick and the aged were burned alive in their
dwellings. Some had their hands and arms and legs lopped off, and fire
applied to the severed parts to staunch the bleeding and prolong their
suffering. Some were flayed alive, some were roasted alive, some
disemboweled; or tied to trees in their own orchards, and their hearts cut out.
Some were horribly mutilated, and of others the brains were boiled and
eaten by these cannibals. Some were fastened down into the furrows of their
own fields, and ploughed into the soil as men plough manure into it. Others
were buried alive. Fathers were marched to death with the heads of their
 sons suspended round their necks. Parents were compelled to look on while
their children were first outraged [raped], then massacred, before being
themselves permitted to die.”
–Wylie, J. A. (1996) [1860]. “History of the Waldenses”. Hartland, p.
132.
o This is historically known as the Piedmont Easter massacre. It is
estimated that around 1,700 Waldensians were slaughtered in
such a brutal manner that it aroused severe indignation
throughout Europe. The forms of torture here wouldn’t be too
far-fetched for the Nazis who hate the Jews and virtually
everyone else who isn’t them.
 "And we have it on good authority that the Jesuits have been active in
forming other holy orders (or sodalities), such as the Knights of Peter Claver
and the Knights of Columbus, over which they retain immense control. For it
is an old trick on the part of the sons of Loyola, that whenever their Order is
UNDER THREAT or SUSPICION they swell their numbers by means of
sodalities of 'new' orders."
—P.D. Stuart, Codword Barbelon: Danger in the Vatican (London: Lux
Verbi, 2008): p. 212.
o Interestingly, the Knights of Columbus have a similar Oath as
the Jesuits. It is part of the classic Art of War to make new
fronts in your army to ensure that the general is protected from
harm and blame.
 "Moreover, the Pope has thousands of secret agents worldwide. They include
Jesuits, the Knights of Columbus, Knights of Malta, Opus Dei, and others. The
Vatican's Intelligence Service and its field resources are second to non."
—Guiseppe Mazzini, Letter to Grand Commander Albert Pike (33rd
Degree), January 22, 1870.
 "There is considerable analogy between Masonic and Jesuitic degrees: and
the Jesuits also tread down the shoe and bare the knee, because Ignatius
Loyola thus presented himself at Rome and asked for the confirmation of the
Order."
—Charles Heckthorn, (1900), as quoted in Lady Queensborough,
Occult Theocrasy (South Pasadena, California: Emissarv Publications.
1980): p. 313.
//Above: Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (1831-1891), the greatest esoteric spiritist writer of the
New Age. She is highly esteemed in esoteric circles because she is essentially the prophetess
of Satan.

“It is curious to note too that most of the bodies which work these, such as
the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, the Rite of Avignon, the Order of the
Temple, Fessler's Rite, the "Grand Council of the Emperors of the East and
West—"Sovereign Prince Masons," etc., etc., are nearly all the offspring of the
sons of  Ignatius Loyola. The Baron Hundt, Chevalier Ramsay, Tschoudy,
Zinnendorf, and numerous others who founded the grades in these rites,
worked under instructions from the General of the Jesuits. The nest where
these high degrees were hatched, and no Masonic rite is free from their
baleful influence more or less, was the Jesuit College of Clermont at Paris
(emphasis added).”
—Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, “Isis Unveiled” (Los Angeles, CA: The
Theosophy Company, 1968): 390.
THE PURPOSE OF THE JESUITS:

 "Its [the Jesuit Order's] objective was, and is still, to destroy the effects of the
Reformation and to re-establish the Holy Roman Empire of the GERMAN
NATION... A GREATER GERMANY, in other words, must be made again the
center of a REVIVED HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE."
 —Leo H. Lehmann (an American Historian), "Behind the Dictators",
(New York: Agora Publishing Co., 1942) p. 26.
 “The papacy is but the ghost of the Roman Empire, sitting crowned upon the
grave thereof.”
—J. Gaskin (ed.), Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (Oxford University Press,
1998):463.
 “...those are the worst of the Catholics, the Inquisitors, the Jesuits!... They are
simply the Romish army for the Earthly sovereignty of the world in the future,
which the Pontiff of Rome for Emperor... that’s their ideal, but there’s no sort
of mystery of lofty melancholy about it... its simple lust of power, of filthy
earthly gain, of domination - something like a universal serfdom with them
as master - that’s all they stand for. They don’t even believe in God perhaps.”
—“The Brothers Karamazov”, by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, (New
York:Random House, 1950; originally published in 1880) p. 309.
o Note on Author: Dostoevsky died less than four months after
“The Brothers Karamazov” publication.
 According to Abraham Lincoln,
“The Protestants of both the North and South would surely unite to
exterminate the priests and the Jesuits, if they could learn how the priests,
the nuns, and the monks, which daily land on our shores, under the pretest of
preaching their religion... are nothing else but the emissaries of the Pope, of
Napoleon III, and the other despots of Europe, to undermine our institutions,
alienate the hearts of our people from our constitution, and our laws, destroy
our schools, and prepare a reign of anarchy here as they have done in
Ireland, in Mexico, in Spain, and wherever there are any people who want to
be free.”
—Restated in ¨Fifty Years in the Church of Rome¨ by Charles Chiniquy,
(Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Book House, 1968; originally
published in 1886) p. 499.
o Charles Chiniquy hired Abraham Lincoln as a lawyer. Chiniquy
was a long-term Catholic priest before he broke his allegiance
to the Bishop of Rome.
 “The Roman Catholic [Marquis de] Lafayette warned... ‘It is my opinion that if
the liberties of this country - the United States of America - are destroyed, it
will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the
most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have
instigated most of the wars of Europe.’”
—”Romanism: A Menace to the Nation”, Jeremiah J. Crowley, (Aurora,
Missouri: The Menace Publishing Co., 1912) p. 140.
o Marquis de Lafayette was a French military officer and aristocrat
who fought in the American Revolutionary War. He
 commanded American troops in several battles which included
the Siege of Yorktown.
 An example as to how the Jesuits planned for a “War in Europe”:

On May 28, AD 1588, the Spanish Armada, under Jesuit influence, with the
Duke of Medina-Sidonia departed Lisbon to invade England when England
was under the queenship of Queen Elizabeth I, a Protestant Queen.
o "The Jesuits were called to help and they said, 'We must
undermine the Bible of the Protestants and destroy their
teachings.'... The Queen of England realizing the damage the
Jesuit [Douay] Bible would do, sent to Europe for Beza, who was
with John Calvin, to help...Thomas Cartwright... With one hand
he took hold of all the Greek manuscripts and with the other
hand he took hold of all the Latin manuscripts from the Received
Text, and he hit the Jesuit Bible blow after blow... Finally the
Spanish Armada came against England with 136 armed ships
some with 50 cannons... England could only gather thirty ships
and these were lead by Sir Francis Drake. Freak storms came
down the English Channel and the Spanish ships were found
wrecked right up to the Scottish coast and England became a
great sea power."
—Les Garret, 1982. Which Bible Can We Trust? Christian
Centre Press. P. 60)
 The historical context here is that the Jesuits had a
grudge for England and her Protestant Queen
Elizabeth the First. Because of this enmity the
Jesuits, as required of the Jesuits in their solemn
oath, had planned for England’s destruction by
using the Spanish fleet of Spain to destroy England
when England was vulnerable; however, the Lord
God of Heaven had stretched out his hand upon
the seas and destroyed the Spanish Armada, with a
Freak Storm, to save his people and the Protestant
Bible.The Jesuits were instrumental in manipulating
the tensions between Protestant Queen Elizabeth I
and the Catholic Queen of Scotts, who Elizabeth
had as a prisoner. The Jesuits had planned for Mary,
the Queen of Scotts (a representation of a Catholic
Monarchy), to be executed by her cousin Elizabeth
for a staged conspiracy against the Queen of
England. The execution happened and the intent
 was that an enraged Spain (a Catholic Nation)
would wage war against England.
o “Most of our encyclopedias and history textbooks do NOT tell us
that the purpose of the attempted invasion of England in 1588
by the Spanish Armada was to land troops in England to be
joined by local Roman Catholics in an effort to overthrow the
government and bring England [under the rule of the Protestant
Queen of England, Queen Elizabeth I], by force, back under the
authority of Papal Rome! The Roman Catholic King of Spain
(Philip II) wanted financial ‘compensation’ for launching this
invasion. And so the Roman pontiff, Pope Sixtus V, promised
King Philip II 200,000 crowns as soon as the Spanish Armada
had set sail for England, and more cash to follow later. Thus the
Papacy was helping to fund the planned invasion of England (all
emphasis in original)!”
—Darryl Eberhart, "Deceitful Revisers," Tackling the Tough
Topics (January 20, 2006).
 Pope Sixtus V treated the invasion of England as
another crusade.
 In 1816, John Adams wrote to President Thomas Jefferson,
“Shall we not have regular swarms of them [Jesuits] here, in as many
disguises as only a king of the gypsies can assume, dressed as painters,
publishers, writers, and schoolmasters? If ever there was a body of men who
merited eternal damnation on Earth and in hell it is this Society of Loyola’s”
—“The New Jesuits”, George Reimer, (Boston, Massachusetts: Little,
Brown & Co., 1971) p. 14.
 Samuel Morse (Founder of the Morse Code) on the Great Jesuit
Conspiracy:
"The author undertakes to show that a conspiracy against the liberties of this
Republic is now in full action, under the direction of the wily Prince
Metternich of Austria, who knowing the impossibility of obliterating this
troublesome example of a great and free nation by force of arms, is
attempting to accomplish his object through the agency of an army of
Jesuits. The array of facts and arguments going to prove the existence of such
a conspiracy, will astonish any man who opens the book with the same
incredulity as we did.”
—“Foreign Conspiracy Against the Liberties of the United States”,
Samuel Morse. (Boston, Massachusetts: Crocker & Brewster, 1815) Vol.
I, p. 4.
 An example of Jesuit Church espionage:
o Jesuits concerning their agenda to undermine the
Protestant Church of England:
 “Before the English people could go the way of the Continent and
be brought to question their great English Bible, the course of
their thinking must be changed. Much had to be done to
discredit, in their eyes, the Reformation—its history, doctrines,
and documents—which they looked upon as a great work of
God.  This task was accomplished by those who, while
WORKING UNDER COVER, passed as friends.  In what
numbers the  JESUITS  were at hand to bring' this about the
following words, from one qualified to know, will reveal:”
—Benjamin G. Wilkinson, “Our Authorized Bible
Vindicated”, Leaves of Autumn Books, Inc., 1996
o According to a priest at Rome, Professor of Theology and
the official Theological Censor of the Inquisition,
"The English clergy were formerly too much attached to their
Articles of Faith to be shaken from them. You might have
employed in vain all the machines set in motion by Bossuet and
the Jansenists of France to reunite them to the Romish Church;
and so the Jesuits of England tried another plan. This was to
demonstrate from history and ecclesiastical antiquity the
legitimacy of the usages of the English Church, whence, through
the exertions of  the JESUITS CONCEALED among its
[protestant] clergy, might arise a studious attention to
Christian antiquity. This was designed to occupy the clergy in
long, laborious, and abstruse investigation, and to alienate them
from their Bibles."
—Gaetano De Sanctis, “Popery and Jesuitism in Rome”, pp.
126,134; quoted in Walsh, “Secret History of Oxford
Movement”, p. 33.
 John Henry Newman (canonized as a Saint by
Pope Francis I—the Jesuit Pope—in 2019),
leader of the Oxford movement who later
became a Catholic Cardinal, wrote in 1841:
“Only through the English Church can you act upon
the English nation. I wish, of course, our Church
should be consolidated, with and through and in
your communion, for its sake, and your sake, and for
the sake of unity.”
—J.H. Newman, “Apologia”, p. 225 [Newman
and his associates believed that Protestantism
was Antichrist]
 F.W. Faber one of the associates of John Henry
Newman (the leader of the Oxford movement)
 in the Oxford Movement, said:
“Protestantism is perishing: what is good in it is by
God's mercy being gathered into the garners of
Rome... My whole life, God willing, shall be one
crusade against the detestable and diabolical heresy
of Protestantism."
—J.E. Bowden, “Life of F.W. Faber” (1869), p.
192

“For  today Rome considers the Fascist regime the nearest to its dogmas and interest.
We have not merely the Reverend (Jesuit) Father Coughlin praising Mussolini's Italy as ‘a
Christian Democracy,’ but Civilita Cattolica, house organ of the Jesuits [official periodical of
the Society of Loyola], SAYS QUITE FRANKLY ‘Fascism is the regime that corresponds most
closely to the concepts of the Church of Rome.’"
—Pierre van Paassen, Days of our Years (New York: Hillman-Curl, 1939): 465.

 Optional Read: Martin White's answer to What is the political and

economic policy of the papacy?

Are the Jesuits still relevant in the Catholic Church?

 Pope Benedict XVI to the Jesuits (February 21, 2008):

"For this, I have invited you today to also reflect, in order to find again a
sense of fuller obedience to the Successor of Peter, so that it does not only
involve the cases of sending you on missions to far lands, but also - in the
most genuine ignited spirit of "feeling with the Church and in the Church" -
"to love and to serve" the Vicar of Christ on earth with that "effective and
affective" devotion that must make of you the precious and irreplaceable
collaborators in the service for the universal Church."
—Translated From The Original Latin: “DISCORSO DI SUA SANTITÀ
BENEDETTO XVI AI PADRI DELLA CONGREGAZIONE GENERALE DELLA
COMPAGNIA DI GESÙ.” Sala Clementino Glovedi, 21 febbraio 2008
Have the Jesuits AND the Catholic Church Changed over the centuries?

 Extract of Pope Benedict XVI in a letter to Jesuits prior to the election

of the new Jesuit General, Peter-Hans Kolvenbach:  "I too gladly wish to
 take this opportunity of a General Congregation to bring such a contribution
to light .... which might be of encouragement for you and a stimulus to
implement ever better the ideal of the Society, in full fidelity to the
Magisterium of the Church, such as described in the following formula which
is well familiar to you: ‘To serve as a soldier of God beneath the banner of
the Cross and to serve the Lord alone and the Church, his spouse, under the
Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ on earth’ (Apostolic Letter Exposcit
debitum, 21 July 1550). One treats here of a ‘peculiar’ fidelity confirmed also,
by not a few among you, in a vow of immediate obedience to the Successor
of Peter ‘perinde ac cadaver’. The Church has even more need today of this
fidelity of yours, which constitutes a distinctive sign of your Order, in this era
which warns of the urgency of transmitting in an integral manner to our
contemporaries — distracted by many discordant voices"
—Pope Benedict XVI, Letter to Fr. Peter-Hans Kolvenbach (January 10,
2008; made public on January 18).
o The phrase “perinde ac cadaver”  refers to obedience “in the
manner of a corpse”.
 "What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us
too, and it cannot be all of a sudden entirely forbidden or even considered
harmful."
—Pope Benedict XVI, “Summorum Pontificum” (2007)
 The Papacy itself says that no doctrines were changed during Vatican
II:
“FIRST QUESTION: Did the Second Vatican Council change the Catholic
doctrine on the Church?
RESPONSE: The Second Vatican Council  neither changed nor intended to
change this doctrine, rather it developed, deepened and more fully
explained it.  This was exactly what John XXIII said at the beginning of the
Council. Paul VI affirmed it and commented in the act of promulgating the
Constitution Lumen gentium: “There is no better comment to make than to
say that this promulgation really changes nothing of the traditional doctrine.
What Christ willed, we also will. What was, still is. What the Church has
taught down through the centuries, we also teach. In simple terms that which
was assumed, is now explicit; that which was uncertain, is now clarified; that
which was meditated upon, discussed and sometimes argued over, is now put
together in one clear formulation (emphasis added).”
—Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, “Responses to Some
Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine on the Church”,
Vatican.va [official website of the Papacy]
o The same sentiments in the past regarding the Church’s role in
wiping out “heretics” is the same as it was then and now.
 o In actual fact, the quotation directly above, sourced from the
official website of the Vatican, is written by the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith which is formerly known as the
“Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and  Universal
Inquisition”.
o “Between  1555 and 1931 [thats a long span of time]  the
Society of Jesus [the Jesuits] was expelled from at least 83
countries, city states and cities, for engaging in political intrigue
and subversion plots against the welfare of the State, according
to the records of a Jesuit priest of repute…Practically every
instance of expulsion was for political intrigue, political
infiltration, political subversion, and inciting to political
insurrection.”
—J.E.C. Shepherd (Canadian historian), “The Babington
Plot: Jesuit Intrigue in Elizabethan England” (Toronto,
Canada: Wittenburg Publications): 12:
 Catholic Sources on “Heresy”:
o “The papacy acknowledges that they have done just this when
they said, ‘The church has persecuted. Only a tyro [novice] in
history will deny that… Protestants were persecuted in France
and Spain with the full approval of the church authorities. We
have always defended the persecution of the Huguenots and the
Spanish Inquisition.’”
—”Western Watchman” (a Roman Catholic periodical),
December 24, 1908.
o “Heretics (those who are not members of the Catholic Church or
who do not hold to Catholic doctrine) worship a God who is a
liar, and a Christ who is a liar.”
—St. Augustine, (quoted in “Patrologiae Cursus Completus:
Series Graca”, by Fr. J. P. Migne, Paris: 1866, 42:207).
o “Heresy is the obstinate post-baptismal denial of some truth
which must be believed with divine and catholic faith or it is
likewise an obstinate doubt concerning the same;.... schism is the
refusal of submission to the Roman Pontiff or of communion
with the members of the Church subject to him.
—"Faith," The Catechism of the Catholic Church (Liguori
Publications, 1994): 507.
o “When confronted with heresy, she (Catholic Church) does not
content herself with persuasion, arguments of an intellectual and
moral order appear to her insufficient, and she has recourse to
force, to corporal punishment, to torture.”
—The Rector of the Catholic Institute of Paris, H.M.A.
 Baudrillart, quoted in “The Catholic Church, The
Renaissance, and Protestantism”, p. 182-183.
o “A heretic merits the pains of fire....By the Gospel, the canons,
civil law, and custom, heretics must be burned.”
—”The American Textbook of Popery”, p 164 (quoting
from the “Directory for the Inquisitors”).
o “For today Rome considers the Fascist regime the nearest to its
dogmas and interest. We have not merely the Reverend (Jesuit)
Father Coughlin praising Mussolini's Italy as "a Christian
Democracy," but Civilita Cattolica, house organ of the Jesuits
[Catholic Society of Loyola], says quite frankly ‘Fascism is the
regime that corresponds most closely to the concepts of the
Church of Rome.’"
—Pierre van Paassen, Days of our Years (New York:
Hillman-Curl, 1939): 465.
o “There is no graver offense than heresy... and therefore it must be
rooted out with fire and sword.”
—Catholic Encyclopedia, volume 14 (1911): 767-768
o "Whoever denies or places in doubt any truth that must be
believed with divine and catholic faith, or repudiates the
Christian faith as a whole, and does not come to his senses after
having been legitimately warned, is to be punished as a
heretic...whoever obstinately rejects a teaching that the Roman
Pontiff or the College of Bishops, exercising the authentic
Magisterium, have set forth to be held definitively, or who affirms
what they have condemned as erroneous, and does not retract
after having been legitimately warned, is to be punished with an
appropriate penalty."
—Pope John Paul II, in his apostolic letter Ad Tuendam
Fidem (May 18, 1998)
o When the Jesuit St. Francis Xavier arrived in India he
immediately requested the pope to set up the Inquisition
there.
"’The Jewish wickedness” of which Xavier complained was
evidently the Sabbath-keeping among those native Christians...
When one of these Sabbathkeeping Christians was taken by the
Inquisition he was accused of having *Judaized*; which means
having conformed to the ceremonies of the [Jews]."
—Account of the Inquisition at Goa, Dellon, p.56. London,
1815
According to historical writings of the most translated woman writer in the entire
history of literature and most translated American author of either gender:

 “Throughout Christendom, Protestantism was menaced by formidable foes.

The first triumphs of the Reformation past, Rome summoned new forces,
hoping to accomplish its destruction. At this time the order of the Jesuits was
created, the most cruel, unscrupulous, and powerful of all the champions of
popery. Cut off from earthly ties and human interests, dead to the claims of
natural affection, reason and conscience wholly silenced, they knew no rule,
no tie, but that of their order, and no duty but to extend its power. (See
Appendix.) The gospel of Christ had enabled its adherents to meet danger
and endure suffering, undismayed by cold, hunger, toil, and poverty, to
uphold the banner of truth in face of the rack, the dungeon, and the stake. To
combat these forces, Jesuitism inspired its followers with a fanaticism that
enabled them to endure like dangers, and to oppose to the power of truth all
the weapons of deception. There was no crime too great for them to commit,
no deception too base for them to practice, no disguise too difficult for them
to assume. Vowed to perpetual poverty and humility, it was their studied aim
to secure wealth and power, to be devoted to the overthrow of Protestantism,
and the re-establishment of the papal supremacy. [235]”
—White, E. G. (2015). “The Great Controversy”. Originally published in
1858.
 “The defenders of the papacy declare that the church has been maligned,
and the Protestant world are inclined to accept the statement. Many urge
that it is unjust to judge the church of today by the abominations and
absurdities that marked her reign during the centuries of ignorance and
darkness. They excuse her horrible cruelty as the result of the barbarism of
the times and plead that the influence of modern civilization has changed
her sentiments[563]. Have these persons forgotten the claim of infallibility
put forth for eight hundred years by this haughty power? So far from being
relinquished, this claim was affirmed in the nineteenth century with greater
positiveness than ever before. As Rome asserts that the “church never erred;
nor will it, according to the Scriptures, ever err” (John L. von Mosheim,
Institutes of Ecclesiastical History, book 3, century II, part 2, chapter 2, section
9, note 17), how can she renounce the principles which governed her course
in past ages? [564]. The papal church will never relinquish her claim to
infallibility. All that she has done in her persecution of those who reject her
dogmas she holds to be right; and would she not repeat the same acts,
should the opportunity be presented? Let the restraints now imposed by
secular governments be removed and Rome be reinstated in her former
 power, and there would speedily be a REVIVAL OF HER TYRANNY AND
PERSECUTION [564].”
—White, E. G. (2015). “The Great Controversy”. Originally published in
1858.
o The church of Rome has never changed its teachings. They are
tied to the teaching of “Semper Idem” meaning, “always the
same”.
 “There is another and more important question that should engage the
attention of the churches of today. The apostle Paul declares that “all that
will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.”  2 Timothy 3:12. Why is
it, then, that persecution seems in a great degree to slumber? The only
reason is that the church has conformed to the world's standard and
therefore awakens no opposition. The religion which is current in our day is
not of the pure and holy character that marked the Christian faith in the
days of Christ and His apostles. It is only because of the spirit of compromise
with sin, because the great truths of the word of God are so indifferently
regarded, because there is so little vital godliness in the church, that
Christianity is apparently so popular with the world. Let there be a revival of
the faith and power of the early church, and the spirit of persecution will be
revived, and the FIRES OF PERSECUTION WILL BE REKINDLED. [48]″
—White, E. G. (2015). “The Great Controversy”. Originally published in
1858.

Behold, this is the Crusade of the Twentieth Century.