Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Core Lab All Com 10-24-22
Core Lab All Com 10-24-22
Laboratory
For questions about the use of the Checklists or Checklist interpretation, email [email protected] or call
800-323-4040 or 847-832-7000 (international customers, use country code 001).
The Checklists used for inspection by the College of American Pathologists' Accreditation Programs
have been created by the CAP and are copyrighted works of the CAP. The CAP has authorized copying
and use of the checklists by CAP inspectors in conducting laboratory inspections for the Council on
Accreditation and by laboratories that are preparing for such inspections. Except as permitted by section
107 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. sec. 107, any other use of the Checklists constitutes infringement
of the CAP's copyrights in the Checklists. The CAP will take appropriate legal action to protect these
copyrights.
All Checklists are ©2022. College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 3 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY OF CHANGES....................................................................................................................4
UNDERSTANDING THE CAP ACCREDITATION CHECKLIST COMPONENTS................................ 6
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................... 6
DEFINITION OF TERMS....................................................................................................................... 6
ALL COMMON CHECKLIST............................................................................................................... 12
PROFICIENCY TESTING.................................................................................................................................................. 12
QUALITY MANAGEMENT................................................................................................................................................. 18
GENERAL ISSUES..................................................................................................................................................... 18
SPECIMEN COLLECTION AND HANDLING............................................................................................................. 20
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL.......................................................................................................................23
RESULTS REPORTING.............................................................................................................................................. 25
REAGENTS................................................................................................................................................................. 27
INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT............................................................................................................................30
Instrument and Equipment Maintenance/Function Checks.................................................................................. 30
Thermometers....................................................................................................................................................... 32
Temperature-Dependent Instruments, Equipment, and Environments.................................................................33
Volumetric Glassware and Pipettes...................................................................................................................... 34
Analytical Balances............................................................................................................................................... 36
WAIVED TEST IMPLEMENTATION..................................................................................................................................37
TEST METHOD VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION - NONWAIVED TESTS..................................................................38
INDIVIDUALIZED QUALITY CONTROL PLAN (IQCP).....................................................................................................49
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 4 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
● Master — contains ALL of the requirements and instructions available in PDF, Word/XML or Excel
formats
● Custom — customized based on the laboratory's activity (test) menu; available in PDF, Word/XML or
Excel formats
● Changes Only — contains only those requirements with significant changes since the previous checklist
edition in a track changes format to show the differences; in PDF version only. Requirements that have
been moved or merged appear in a table at the end of the file.
A repository of questions and answers and other resources is also available in e-LAB Solutions Suite under
Accreditation Resources, Checklist Requirement Q & A.
NOTE: The requirements listed below are from the Master version of the checklist. The customized checklist
version created for inspections and self-evaluations may not list all of these requirements.
COM.01300 09/22/2021
COM.01400 09/22/2021
COM.01500 09/22/2021
COM.01600 09/22/2021
COM.01700 09/22/2021
COM.01800 09/22/2021
COM.04000 09/22/2021
COM.06300 09/22/2021
COM.10000 09/22/2021
COM.10100 09/22/2021
COM.30000 10/24/2022
COM.30350 09/22/2021
COM.30400 09/22/2021
COM.30450 09/22/2021
COM.30575 10/24/2022
COM.30750 09/22/2021
COM.30775 09/22/2021
COM.30800 09/22/2021
COM.30840 09/22/2021
COM.30870 09/22/2021
COM.30980 10/24/2022
COM.40300 09/22/2021
COM.40350 09/22/2021
COM.40640 09/22/2021
COM.40700 09/22/2021
COM.40800 09/22/2021
COM.40805 09/22/2021
● Policy/Procedure Icon:
❍ The placement of the icon next to a checklist requirement indicates that a written policy or
procedure is required to demonstrate compliance with the requirement.
❍ The icon is not intended to imply that a separate policy or procedure is required to address
individual requirements. A single policy or procedure may cover multiple checklist requirements.
● NOTE:
❍ Additional detail used to assist in interpreting the requirement. Information in the NOTE is
considered integral to the requirement and must be complied with as part of the declarative
statement itself, unless it is expressed as a best practice or recommendation.
● Evidence of Compliance (EOC):
❍ A listing of suggested ways to demonstrate compliance with the requirement; some elements
are required
The Master version of the checklist also contains references and the inspector R.O.A.D. instructions (Read,
Observe, Ask, Discover), which can provide valuable insight for the basis of requirements and on how
compliance will be assessed.
INTRODUCTION
The All Common Checklist (COM) contains a core set of requirements that apply to all areas performing
laboratory tests and procedures. In some instances, the same requirement exists in both the COM Checklist and
in a discipline-specific checklist, but with more specificity in the discipline-specific checklist. In these situations,
the discipline-specific requirement takes precedence.
One COM Checklist is provided for inspection of each laboratory section or department. If more than one
inspector is assigned to inspect a section, each inspector must be familiar with the COM requirements and
ensure that all testing is in compliance.
Certain requirements are different for waived versus nonwaived tests. Refer to the checklist headings and
explanatory text to determine applicability based on test complexity. The current list of tests waived under CLIA
may be found at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfClia/analyteswaived.cfm
The use of the term "patient" within checklist requirements when referring to specimens, records, testing,
reports, and other required elements is intended to apply broadly to the population served by the laboratory and
may also include donors, clients, and study participants.
Laboratories not subject to US regulations: Checklist requirements apply to all laboratories unless a specific
disclaimer of exclusion is stated in the checklist. When the phrase "FDA-cleared/approved test (or assay)" is
used within the checklist, it also applies to tests approved by an internationally recognized regulatory authority
(eg, CE-marking).
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Addendum - Information appended to a final report with no changes to the original test result(s); original report
is intact and unchanged, the addendum is added as an attachment or supplement to the original report.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 7 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
Alternative performance assessment - A system for determining the reliability of laboratory examinations for
which no commercial proficiency testing products are available, are not appropriate for the method or patient
population served by the laboratory, or participation is not required by the accrediting organization.
Analytical performance characteristics - For a specific test, the properties of a test identified from data
collected during analytical validation or analytical verification studies.
Analytical validation - The process used to confirm with objective evidence that a laboratory-developed or
modified FDA-cleared/approved test method or instrument system delivers reliable results for the intended
application.
Analytical verification - The process by which a laboratory determines that an unmodified FDA-cleared/
approved test performs according to the specifications set forth by the manufacturer when used as directed.
Authority - The power to give orders or make decisions: the power or right to direct someone or control a
process
Biorepository - An entity that collects, processes, stores, manages, and distributes biospecimens for research
purposes. The term laboratory may also be used in the checklist to generically refer to a biorepository
participating in the CAP's Biorepository Accreditation Program.
Check - Examination to determine the accuracy, quality or presence of any attribute of a test system
Clinical performance characteristics - For a specific test, the properties of a test identified from data collected
during studies of clinical validation, clinical utility, or clinical usefulness.
Clinical validation - The determination of the ability of a test to diagnose or predict risk of a particular health
condition or predisposition, measured by sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values
Commutable - The property of a reference material that yields the same numeric result as would a patient's
specimen containing the same quantity of analyte in the analytic method under discussion (ie, matrix effects are
absent).
Corrected/correction - A change in a previously issued clinical pathology test report intended to correct an
inaccuracy, including changes in test results, patient identification, reference intervals, interpretation, or other
content.
Corrective Action - Action taken to eliminate the cause of a detected nonconformity or other undesirable
situation
Credentialing - The process of obtaining, verifying, and assessing the qualifications of a practitioner to provide
care in a health care organization
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 8 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
Device - Any reagent, reagent product, kit, instrument, apparatus, equipment or related product, whether used
alone or in combination, intended by the manufacturer to be distributed for use in vitro for the examination of
human specimens
Digital image analysis - The computer-assisted software detection or quantification of specific features in
an image following enhancement and processing of that image, including analysis of immunohistochemistry
samples, DNA analysis, morphometric analysis, and in situ hybridization
Distributive testing - Laboratory testing performed on the same specimen, or aliquot of it, that requires sharing
between two or more laboratories (with different CLIA/CAP numbers) to provide a final, reportable result for the
originally-ordered test. The laboratories involved may perform separate steps of "wet" testing, or may perform
calculations, data analysis/informatics processing, or interpretive processes; all such models fall under the term
distributive testing.
Equipment - Single apparatus or set of devices or apparatuses needed to perform a specific task
Examination - In the context of checklist requirements, examination refers to the process of inspection of
tissues and samples prior to analysis. An examination is not an analytical test.
External quality control - A stable material designed to simulate a patient specimen for monitoring the
performance of a test procedure or system to ensure reliable results. Common examples include positive and
negative liquid materials or swabs provided with test kits; assayed and unassayed liquid controls provided by
an instrument manufacturer, third party supplier or prepared by the laboratory; and control slides purchased
or prepared by the laboratory to demonstrate appropriate reactivity or staining characteristics. In contrast to
internal quality control processes, external quality control materials are not built into the performance of the
clinical assay. External quality control materials are not to be confused with external quality assessment (EQA)
program materials (external proficiency testing).
FDA - 1) For laboratories subject to US regulations, FDA refers to the US Food and Drug Administration, which
is the regulatory body under Health and Human Services (HHS) with authority to regulate in vitro diagnostic
products such as kits, reagents, instruments, and test systems; 2) For laboratories not subject to US regulations,
FDA refers to the national, state or provincial, or local authority having jurisdiction over in vitro diagnostic test
systems.
Function Check - Confirmation that an instrument or item of equipment operates according to manufacturer's
specifications prior to initial use, at prescribed intervals, or after minor adjustment (e.g. base line calibration,
balancing/zero adjustment, thermometer calibration, reagent delivery).
High complexity - Rating given by the FDA to commercially marketed in vitro diagnostic tests based on their
risks to public health. Tests in this category are seen to have the highest risks to public health.
Instrument - An analytical unit that uses samples to perform chemical or physical assays (e.g. chemistry
analyzer, hematology analyzer)
Instrument platform - Any of a series of similar or identical analytical methods intended by their manufacturer
to give identical patient results across all models
Internal quality control - Processes integrated into the testing instrument and/or test system designed to
monitor the performance of a test to ensure reliable results. Internal quality control may include electronic, built-
in, or procedural control systems. On instruments/test systems with internal QC processes, performing the
internal QC is typically a physical requirement of performance of the assay on clinical specimens.
Laboratory - Term used to refer to a clinical laboratory, biorepository, forensic drug testing laboratory, or
reproductive laboratory participating in the CAP accreditation programs.
Laboratory Director - The individual who is responsible for the overall operation and administration of
the laboratory, including provision of timely, reliable and clinically relevant test results and compliance with
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 9 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
applicable regulations and accreditation requirements. This individual is listed on the laboratory's CAP and CLIA
certificate (as applicable).
Maintenance - Activities that prolong the life of an instrument or minimize breakdowns or mechanical
malfunctions. Examples include cleaning, lubrication, electronic checks, or changing parts, fluids, or tubing, etc.
Moderate complexity - Rating given by the FDA to commercially marketed in vitro diagnostic tests based on
their risks to public health
For laboratories subject to US regulations, this includes modifications to FDA-cleared/approved tests. For
laboratories not subject to US regulations, it also includes modifications to tests approved by an internationally
recognized regulatory authority (eg, CE marking).
Non-conforming event - An occurrence that: 1) deviates from the laboratory's policies or procedures; 2) does
not comply with applicable regulatory or accreditation requirements; or 3) has the potential to affect (or has
affected) patients, donors, the general public, or personnel safety.
Pathologist - A physician who has successfully completed an approved graduate medical education program in
pathology.
In the US, a physician is defined as a doctor of medicine, doctor of osteopathy, or doctor of podiatric medicine
who is licensed by the state to practice medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry within the state in which the laboratory
is located. In jurisdictions not subject to US regulations, a physician is defined as an individual who has a
primary medical school degree (eg, MBBS, MBChB, MD, DO) in keeping with the standards of that particular
jurisdiction.
Performance verification - The set of processes that demonstrate an instrument or an item of equipment
operates according to expectations prior to initial use and after repair or reconditioning (eg, replacement of
critical components)
Personnel - The collective group of employees and contractors employed in the laboratory organization.
Contractors may include those individuals contracted by the laboratory, such as pathologists, medical
technologists, or nurses who perform patient testing. It would not include those individuals contracted outside
the authority of the laboratory, such as medical waste disposal contractors, instrument service representatives,
or cleaning contractors.
Policy - Written statement of overall guidelines, strategy, approach, intentions and directions endorsed by
laboratory leadership that direct or restrict a facility's plans, actions, and decisions.
Predictive marker testing - Immunohistochemical, immunocytochemical, and in situ hybridization tests used
to predict responsiveness to a specific treatment independent of other histopathologic findings. Rather than
confirming a specific diagnosis, these tests differentiate predicted responsiveness to a targeted therapy among
cases of the same diagnosis.
Preventive action - Action taken to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity or any other undesirable
potential situation
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 10 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
Primary source verification report - A document, usually prepared by a third party agent or company that
confirms that a job applicant's degree, certificate, or diploma is authentic, licenses were granted, and reported
work history (company names, locations, dates and positions held) is accurate. The confirmation is obtained
through direct contact with an institution, former employer, or their authorized agents.
Primary specimen - The body fluid, tissue, or sample submitted for examination, study or analysis. It may be
within a collection tube, cup, syringe, swab, slide, data file, or other form as received by the laboratory.
Procedure - Set of specific instructions that describe the stepwise actions taken to complete a process,
operation, activity, or task
Process - 1) A set of related tasks or activities that accomplishes a work goal; 2) A set of interrelated or
interacting activities that transforms inputs into outputs
Qualified pathologist - A pathologist who has training in the specific functions to be performed (eg, an
anatomic pathologist for anatomic pathology functions, a clinical pathologist for clinical pathology functions, or
an anatomic pathologist or dermatopathologist for skin biopsies).
Quality management system (QMS) - A QMS is a set of policies, processes, procedures, and resources
designed to ensure high quality in an organization's services.
Reagent - Any substance in a test system other than a solvent or support material that is required for the target
analyte to be detected and its value measured in a sample.
Reference interval - The range of test values expected for a designated population of individuals.
Report errors - A report element (see GEN.41096) that is either incorrect or incomplete
Root cause analysis (RCA) - A systematic process for identifying the causal factor(s) that underlie errors or
potential errors in care.
Scope of Service - The scope of service is the description of the tests/services that the laboratory provides to
its customers/clients (eg, tests offered, hours of operation, turnaround times).
Secondary specimen - Any derivative of the primary specimen used in subsequent phases of testing. It may
be an aliquot, dilution tube, slide, block, culture plate, reaction unit, data extract file, image, or other form during
the processing or testing of a specimen. (The aliquots or images created by automated devices and tracked by
internal electronic means are not secondary specimens.)
Section Director - The individual who is responsible for the technical and/or scientific oversight of a specialty or
section of the laboratory.
Sentinel event - An unexpected occurrence that reaches a patient and results in death, permanent harm, or
severe temporary harm, unrelated to the natural cause of the patient's illness or underlying condition.
Subject to US Regulations - Laboratories located within the United States and laboratories located outside of
the US that have obtained or applied for a CLIA certificate to perform laboratory testing on specimens collected
in the US and its territories for the assessment of the health of human beings.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 11 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
Telepathology - The practice of pathology and cytology in which digitized or analog video, still image(s), or
other data files are examined and an interpretation is rendered that is included in a formal diagnostic report in
the patient record. It also includes the review of images by a cytotechnologist when a judgment of adequacy is
recorded in the patient record.
Test - A qualitative, semiqualitative, quantitative, or semiquantitative procedure for detecting the presence of, or
measuring of an analyte
Testing personnel - Individuals responsible for performing laboratory assays and reporting laboratory results
Test system - The process that includes pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic steps used to produce a
test result or set of results. A test system may be manual, automated, multi-channel or single-use and can
include reagents, components, equipment and/or instruments required to produce results. A test system may
encompass multiple identical analyzers or devices. Different test systems may be used for the same analyte.
Waived - A category of tests defined as "simple laboratory examinations and procedures which have an
insignificant risk of an erroneous result." Laboratories performing waived tests are subject to minimal regulatory
requirements.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 12 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
The extent of a laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) and alternative performance assessment policies and
procedures must be sufficient for the extent and complexity of testing performed in the laboratory. They must
address preanalytic, analytic, and post analytic processes, such as:
● Enrollment in required PT or development of alternative performance assessment processes
● Proper handling and analysis of testing materials
● Review and reporting of results
● Evaluation of results
● Investigation of each unacceptable result to evaluate the impact on patient test results and to correct
problems identified in a timely manner.
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.01100 Ungraded PT Challenges Phase II
The laboratory director or designee assesses its performance on proficiency testing (PT)
challenges that are ungraded.
NOTE: The laboratory's CAP Activity Menu must include all patient/client testing performed by
the laboratory.
● For laboratories with a CLIA certificate, it includes all testing and activities performed
under that CLIA certificate.
● For laboratories not subject to CLIA, it includes all testing and activities meeting all of the
following criteria: 1) performed under the same laboratory director, 2) under the same
laboratory name, and 3) at the same physical premises (contiguous campus).
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 13 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
The testing and activities must be listed on the laboratory's CAP Activity Menu regardless of
whether it is also accredited by another organization. The laboratory must update its CAP
Activity Menu when tests are added or removed by logging into e-LAB Solutions Suite on
cap.org and going to Organization Profile - Sections/Departments. In order to ensure proper
customization of the checklists, the laboratory must also ensure its activity menu is accurate for
non-test activities, such as methods and types of services offered.
Some activities are included on the Master Activity Menu using more generic groupings or
panels instead of listing the individual tests. The Master Activity Menu represents only those
analytes that are directly measured. Calculations are not included, with a few exceptions (eg,
INR, hematocrit).
Laboratories are not required to include testing performed solely for the purpose of research on
their activity menus, but may opt to include such testing if the laboratory wants it to be inspected
by the CAP. Testing performed for research is defined as laboratory testing on human specimens
where patient-specific results are not reported for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of any
disease or impairment of, or the assessment of the health of, human beings. If patient-specific
results are reported from the laboratory, the testing is subject to CLIA and must be reported to
the CAP.
If an inspector identifies that a laboratory is performing tests or procedures not included on the
laboratory's CAP Activity Menu, the inspector must do the following:
● Cite COM.01200 as a deficiency
● Contact the CAP (800-323-4040) for inspection instructions as requirements may be
missing from a laboratory's customized checklist
● Record whether those tests/procedures were inspected on the appropriate section page
in the Inspector's Summation Report (ISR).
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.01300 PT Participation Phase II
The laboratory participates in the appropriate required proficiency testing (PT)/external
quality assessment (EQA) program accepted by CAP for the patient testing performed.
CAP is unable to deliver PT due to oversubscribed programs, stability issues or customs denial,
contingent on CAP approval. If unable to participate, however, the laboratory must implement an
alternative performance assessment procedure for the affected analytes.
NOTE 5: Refer to COM.01520 for PT and alternative performance assessment requirements
for predictive marker testing performed using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization
methods.
NOTE 6: For purposes of photograph/image identification in CAP PT Programs, it is strongly
recommended that current educational resources be available to the bench technologist.
Examples include the bench top resource guides, color atlases, and the Surveys Hematology
Glossary, as applicable.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records such as CAP PT order confirmation indicating that the laboratory is enrolled in CAP
PT Programs for all analytes that CAP requires PT OR record of completed/submitted result
forms for all analytes on the activity menu
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.01400 PT Attestation Statement Phase II
The proficiency testing attestation statement is signed (physical or electronic signature)
by the laboratory director or qualified designee and all individuals involved in the testing
process.
NOTE: If electronic signatures are used for the PT attestation, the laboratory must be able to
show that they are traceable to the event (eg, electronic record with a date/time stamp for the
activity) and are only used by the authorized person (eg, password protected account). A listing
of typed names on the attestation statement does not meet the intent of the requirement. The
signature of the laboratory director or designee need not be obtained prior to reporting results to
the proficiency testing provider.
Designees must be qualified through education and experience to meet the defined regulatory
requirements associated with the complexity of the testing as defined in the Personnel section of
the Laboratory General Checklist.
● For high complexity testing, it may be delegated to an individual meeting the
qualifications of a technical supervisor or section director (GEN.53400). For the
specialties of Histocompatibility, Cytogenetics, and Transfusion Medicine, refer to
specific requirements for the qualifications of section directors/technical supervisors in
the associated checklists (HSC.40000, CYG.50000, and TRM.50050).
● For moderate complexity testing, it may be delegated to an individual meeting the
qualifications of a technical consultant (GEN.53625).
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Appropriately signed attestation statement from submitted PT result forms
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.01500 Alternative Performance Assessment Phase II
For tests for which CAP does not require proficiency testing (PT), the laboratory at least
semiannually exercises an alternative performance assessment system for determining
the reliability of analytic testing.
accordance with good clinical and scientific laboratory practice. Specimens used for alternative
performance assessment must be integrated into the routine workload, where applicable (refer to
COM.01600).
NOTE 2: For in situ hybridization testing other than predictive marker testing, and other
complex molecular and sequencing-based tests (including but not limited to microarray-based
tests, multiplex PCR-based tests, and next generation sequencing-based tests), alternative
performance assessment may be performed by method or specimen type rather than for each
analyte or tested abnormality. For tests such as allergen testing, alternative performance
assessment may be performed in batches of analogous tests.
NOTE 3: Semiannual alternative performance assessment must be performed on tests for which
external PT is not available.
NOTE 4: This checklist requirement applies to both waived and nonwaived tests.
The list of analytes for which CAP requires enrollment and participation in a CAP-accepted
PT program is available on cap.org through e-LAB Solutions Suite under CAP Accreditation
Resources, Master Activity Menu Reports. Also, the inspection packet includes a report with this
information for each laboratory section/department.
A form, Alternative Performance Assessment (APA) Test List, is available on cap.org through e-
LAB Solutions Suite to help laboratories track compliance with this requirement.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ List of tests defined by the laboratory as requiring alternative performance assessments AND
✓ Records of review and evaluation of assessments by the laboratory director or designee
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.01600 PT and Alternative Performance Assessment Specimen Testing Phase II
The laboratory integrates all proficiency testing (PT) and alternative performance
assessment specimens within the routine laboratory workload, where applicable, and
those specimens are analyzed by personnel who routinely test patient/client specimens,
using the same primary method systems as for patient/client/donor specimens.
NOTE: Repetitive analysis of any proficiency specimen by one or more individuals is acceptable
only if patient/client specimens are routinely analyzed in the same manner. With respect
to morphologic examinations (identification of cell types and microorganisms; review of
electrophoretic patterns, etc.), group review and consensus identifications are permitted only for
unknown specimens that would ordinarily be reviewed by more than one person on an actual
patient specimen.
Laboratories that are subject to regulation by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS) are not permitted to test the same analyte from the same PT product on more than one
instrument or method unless that is how the laboratory tests patient specimens and laboratory
procedures are written to reflect that process.
If the laboratory (under one CLIA license) uses multiple methods for an analyte, proficiency
specimens must be analyzed by the primary method at the time of the PT event, or be rotated
among primary methods each PT shipment. Laboratories subject to CMS regulation are not
allowed to order multiple PT kits for the purpose of testing the same specimens/analyte on
multiple instruments or methods prior to the due date for submitting results to the provider.
The educational purposes of PT are best served by a rotation that allows all testing personnel
to be involved in the PT program. PT records must be retained and can be an important part of
the competency and continuing education records in the personnel files of the individuals. PT
materials and specimens specifically used for semiannual alternative performance assessment
purposes must be integrated within the routine workload, where applicable.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 16 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
The US Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
laboratories are subject to different regulations. For both the DOD and the VA, multiple
proficiency testing kits may be ordered, with results reported, from the same proficiency testing
provider on the same analyte; however, laboratories may not compare results from multiple kits
until after the deadline for submission of results to the provider.
Laboratories not subject to US regulations may order multiple proficiency testing kits and
report results from the same proficiency testing provider on the same analyte. They may not
compare results from multiple kits until after the deadline for submission of results to the provider.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Instrument printout and/or work records
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.01700 PT and Alternative Performance Assessment Result Evaluation Phase II
There is ongoing evaluation of proficiency testing (PT) and alternative performance
assessment results by the laboratory director or designee with appropriate corrective
action taken for each unacceptable result.
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.01800 PT Interlaboratory Communication Phase II
There is no interlaboratory communication about proficiency testing specimens and
results until after the deadline for submission of data to the proficiency testing provider.
PT records must not be shared with and should be inaccessible to personnel of other
laboratories, including an affiliated laboratory until after the deadline for submission of results.
Laboratories that share a common computer system or personnel must have strict policies
and procedures to ensure that personnel do not access proficiency testing records from other
laboratories.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ PT records
NOTE 1: The laboratory director must define and enforce written proficiency testing policies that
strictly prohibit referral or acceptance of proficiency testing specimens for analysis from other
laboratories. This applies even if the second laboratory is in the same health care system. This
prohibition takes precedence over the requirement that proficiency testing specimens be handled
in the same manner as patient specimens. For example, a laboratory's routine procedure for
review of patient abnormal CBC blood smears might be referral of the smear to a pathologist
located at another site (different CAP/CLIA number). For proficiency testing specimens, the
laboratory must NOT follow its routine procedure to refer the specimen. If the PT specimen
meets laboratory-defined criteria for referral to a pathologist prior to reporting and the pathologist
is at another site, the pathologist must review the PT specimen at the physical location of the
laboratory performing the PT. Alternatively, the laboratory must refer to the PT provider kit
instructions on how to record a result for a test not performed in the laboratory.
NOTE 2: Laboratories that perform testing using a distributive testing model where portions of
the process are performed at another laboratory with a different CAP/CLIA number must not
participate in formal PT, as this is considered PT referral by CMS and is strictly prohibited. An
alternative performance assessment must be performed at least semiannually in lieu of formal PT
in these situations. Common examples of distributive testing include:
● In situ hybridization and slide interpretation performed at separate laboratories
● Next generation sequencing wet bench process, bioinformatics processes, and/or
interpretation performed at different laboratories
● Leukemia/lymphoma flow cytometry panels and pathologist interpretation of the data at
different laboratories
For laboratories that do not perform staining on site, immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides are
permitted to be sent to another facility for staining only.
NOTE 3: Records of training on referral and acceptance of PT specimens is strongly
recommended.
Refer to 'Tips for Avoiding Proficiency Testing Referral' on the CAP website (http://www.cap.org)
through e-LAB Solutions Suite.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Proficiency testing records
NOTE: In order to resume patient testing, the laboratory must meet the conditions as outlined in
the cease patient testing notification.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 18 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of communication notifying staff/physicians that testing is suspended for the
required period of time OR
✓ LIS report verifying that no patient results were reported for the affected analyte or
subspecialty during the cease testing time frame OR
✓ Patient reports indicating name and address of the referral laboratory where testing was
performed during the affected period OR
✓ Send-out log to referral laboratory
QUALITY MANAGEMENT
GENERAL ISSUES
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.04000 Quality Management System (QMS) Phase II
The laboratory's QMS (as described in GEN.13806) is implemented in each section
(department) of the laboratory.
NOTE: The program must ensure quality throughout the pre-analytic, analytic and post-analytic
phases of testing, as appropriate for each section (department) of the laboratory.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records reflecting conformance with the QMS as designed
NOTE: One common method is review of results by a qualified person (technologist, supervisor,
pathologist) before release from the laboratory, but there is no requirement for supervisory review
of all test results before or after reporting to the patient record. In computerized laboratories,
there should be automatic "traps" for improbable results.
The process for detecting clerical errors, significant analytical errors, and unusual laboratory
results must provide for timely correction of errors, ie, before results become available for clinical
decision making. For confirmed errors detected after reporting, corrections must be promptly
made and reported to the appropriate clinical personnel or referring laboratory, as applicable.
If laboratories use delta checks as a mechanism to detect errors prior to the reporting of patient
results, the laboratory must have written procedures describing the actions to be taken when
acceptability criteria are exceeded and a process for approval of new or changed delta checks by
the laboratory director or designee.
Error detection and correction procedures must include listings of common situations that may
cause analytically inaccurate results and must address such analytic errors or interferences. This
may require alternate testing methods; in some situations, it may not be possible to report results
for some or all of the tests requested.
The intent of this requirement is NOT to require verification of all results outside the reference
interval.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of review of results OR records of consistent implementation of the error detection
processes AND
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 19 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
NOTE: The CAP does NOT require supervisory review of all test results before or after reporting
to the patient record. Rather, this requirement is intended to address only that situation for
"high complexity testing" performed by trained high school graduates qualifying under the CLIA
regulation 42CFR493.1489(b)(5)(i) when a qualified supervisor/general supervisor is not present.
The qualifications to perform high complexity testing can be accessed using the following link:
CAP Personnel Requirements by Testing Complexity.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of result review for specified personnel
NOTE: If problems are identified (eg, maintenance not performed as scheduled), the reviewer
must record corrective action. The review of the records related to tests that have an approved
individualized quality control plan (IQCP) must include an assessment of whether further
evaluation of the risk assessment and quality control plan is needed based on problems identified
(eg, trending for repeat failures, etc.).
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of monthly review
NOTE: This requirement applies to tests performed on the same or different instrument makes/
models or by different methods, even if there are different reference intervals or levels of
sensitivity. It includes primary and back up methods used for patient testing. The purpose of the
requirement is to evaluate the relationship between test results using different methodologies,
instruments, or testing sites.
This requirement is not applicable to:
● Calculated parameters
● Waived methods
● Laboratories with different CAP numbers
The following types of materials may be used to generate data for comparability studies:
● Patient/client specimens (pooled or unpooled) are preferred to avoid potential
matrix effects
● Quality control materials for tests performed on the same instrument platform,
with both control materials and reagents of the same manufacturer and lot
number.
● Alternative protocols based on quality control or reference materials for cases
when availability or pre-analytical stability of patient/client specimens is a limiting
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 20 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
factor. The materials must be validated (when applicable) to have the same
response as fresh human specimens for the instruments and methods involved.
This requirement only applies when the instruments/reagents are producing the same reportable
result. For example, some laboratories may use multiple aPTT reagents with variable sensitivity
to the lupus anticoagulant to perform different tests, such as aPTT for heparin monitoring and a
lupus-like anticoagulant screen. If these are defined as separate tests, this requirement does not
apply unless each type of aPTT test is performed on more than one analyzer.
For Microbiology testing, this requirement applies when two instruments (same or different
manufacturers) are used to detect the same analyte. Two or more detectors or incubation cells
connected to a single data collection, analysis and reporting computer need not be considered
separate systems (eg, multiple incubation and monitoring cells in a continuous monitoring blood
culture instrument, two identical blood culture instruments connected to a single computer
system, or multiple thermocycler cells in a real time polymerase chain reaction instrument). This
checklist requirement does not apply to multiple analytical methods (eg, antigen typing versus
culture or detection of DNA versus a biochemical characteristic) designed to detect the same
analyte.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of comparability studies reflecting performance at least twice per year with
appropriate specimen types
NOTE: Statistically defined acceptability limits should be used for quantitative assays.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of comparability studies with evidence of review and action taken, as appropriate
NOTE: The proximity of the patient to the test site does not preclude the need for proper
identification systems to prevent reporting of one patient's result to another's record. Refer to the
Specimen Collection section of the Laboratory General Checklist for additional information on
patient identification. The specimen collection manual may be in paper or electronic format.
NOTE: A primary specimen container is the innermost container that holds the original
specimen prior to processing and testing. This may be in the form of a specimen collection
tube, cup, syringe, swab, slide or other form of specimen storage. Data files received from
other laboratories for analysis are considered a specimen and must contain acceptable patient
identifiers. Criteria for acceptable specimen labeling and the handling of sub-optimal specimens
must be defined.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 21 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
Examples of acceptable identifiers include, but are not limited to: patient name, date of birth,
hospital number, social security number, requisition number, accession number, unique random
number. A location (eg, hospital room number) is not an acceptable identifier. Identifiers may be
in a machine readable format, such as a barcode.
For prepared slides submitted to the laboratory, if the slides are labeled with only one identifier,
they must be securely submitted in a container labeled with two identifiers.
In limited situations, a single identifier may be used if it can uniquely identify the specimen. For
example, in a trauma situation where a patient's identification is not known, a specimen may be
submitted for testing labeled with a unique code that is traceable to the trauma patient. Other
examples may include forensic specimens, coded or de-identified research specimens, or donor
specimens labeled with a unique code decryptable only by the submitting location.
For specimens where site of origin is critical to the analysis (eg, site specific cultures, surgical
and cytology specimens), the primary specimen container and/or the requisition must clearly
identify the site of origin, and as appropriate, the laterality of the specimen (right versus left). If
more than one specimen container is submitted with one requisition, each container must be
labeled in a manner to ensure linkage of the specimen to the site of origin and laterality.
This requirement does not apply to the labeling of specimens collected for immediate bedside
patient testing performed in the presence of the patient. If the specimens are (or may be) utilized
for testing away from the patient, the labeling criteria defined in this requirement apply.
NOTE: A single, unique identifier may be used to label materials derived from the primary
specimen for use in subsequent phases of testing. The specimen identification system used
must provide reliable identification of the secondary specimen and be linked to the full particulars
of patient identification, collection date, specimen type, etc. The specimen identifier(s) must
be indelible, legible, and able to withstand all stages of processing and conditions of storage.
Identification may be text-based, numeric, bar-coded, etc. The form of this system is entirely at
the discretion of each laboratory.
Slides prepared from specimens in the laboratory are considered secondary specimen
containers. Slides prepared in the patient setting and brought to the laboratory (eg, fine needle
aspiration, bone marrow preparations) are considered primary specimen containers and must
follow the labeling requirements for primary specimen containers.
For histology specimens, each block of tissue must be identified by a unique identifier traceable
to the primary specimen (eg, accession number) assigned to the case and by any descriptive
letter(s)/number(s) added by the prosector during the dissection. If additional blocks are prepared
later, all lists and logs must reflect these additions. Identification number and letter(s)/number(s)
must be affixed to all blocks in a manner that remains legible. Each slide must be identified by
the unique identifier traceable to the primary specimen and descriptive letters unique to the block
from which it is cut. Other appropriate identifiers should be included as applicable (eg, levels of
sectioning). Automated prelabeling systems are acceptable.
**NEW** 09/22/2021
COM.06250 Specimen Aliquoting Phase II
The process used for aliquoting specimens prevents cross-contamination and mix up of
specimens and aliquots.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 22 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
NOTE: Aliquots must not be returned to the original specimen container for specimens to be
used for molecular-based testing or forensic drug testing, or for biorepository storage. For
specimens used for other types of testing, the laboratory must consider contamination and the
potential for specimen mix up when defining its procedure.
If previously aliquoted specimens are used for additional testing, the procedure must define when
and how they can be used.
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.06300 Specimen Rejection Criteria Phase II
The laboratory defines and follows criteria for the rejection or special handling of
specimens that do not meet established laboratory criteria for the requested test(s). The
laboratory retains records of these specimens in the patient/client report and/or quality
management records.
NOTE: The test report must indicate information regarding the condition and disposition of
specimens that do not meet the laboratory's criteria for acceptability for the specific test(s)
requested.
If there is a pre-analytic problem with a specimen, there must be a mechanism to notify clinical
personnel responsible for patient care and record the deviation from the collection instructions. If
the responsible clinical individual (eg, physician) desires the result and the laboratory agrees to
perform testing, the laboratory must note the condition of the specimen on the report and inform
the individual that results from these specimens must be interpreted with caution as some or all
of them may be inaccurate. The laboratory must retain a record of this communication (eg, in
patient report or another laboratory record). For referral laboratories, this may be performed by
the referring laboratory as part of the service agreement.
Examples of specimens not meeting established pre-analytic parameters include:
● Improperly collected, handled (eg, specimen leakage), or stored specimens
● Desiccated specimens, if appropriate
● Specimens submitted beyond their stability time limits
● Insufficient quality/quantity of specimen
● Inadequate specimen labeling or requisition information
● Broken slides
● Hemolyzed, lipemic, or grossly contaminated specimens
● Tissue specimens with inadequate or inappropriate fixation or processing for the specific
test(s) ordered (eg, frozen section specimen submitted for IHC HER2 testing).
For surgical pathology/cytology specimens, some types of specimens may be acceptable for
some types of analysis and not for others. For example, a breast tissue specimen processed for
frozen section would not be acceptable for HER2 IHC testing but is acceptable to use for breast
cancer diagnosis.
For newborn screening specimens, rejection criteria must be consistent with the criteria defined
in the current edition of the CLSI NBS01 Standard, Blood Collection on Filter Paper for Newborn
Screening Programs.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of rejected specimens AND
✓ Records of communications with clinical personnel for specimen deviations AND
✓ Records of disposition of unacceptable specimens
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 23 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
All laboratory testing, functions, and/or processes must be defined in written policies and/or
procedures, with appropriate approval, to assure clarity and consistency.
The manual must address relevant pre-analytic and post-analytic considerations, as well as the analytic
activities of the laboratory. The specific style and format of procedure manuals are at the discretion of the
laboratory director.
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.10000 Policy and Procedure Manual Phase II
A complete policy and procedure manual is available in a paper-based, electronic, or web-
based format at the workbench or in the work area.
NOTE 1: All laboratories testing, functions and/or processes must be defined in written policies
and/or procedures. Procedures must match the laboratory's practice.
NOTE 2: The use of inserts provided by manufacturers is not acceptable in place of a procedure
manual. However, such inserts may be used as part of a procedure description, if the insert
accurately and precisely describes the procedure as performed in the laboratory. Any variation
from this printed or electronic procedure must be detailed in the procedure manual.
NOTE 3: A manufacturer's procedure manual for an instrument/reagent system may be
acceptable as a component of the overall departmental procedures. Any modification to or
deviation from the manufacturer's manual must be clearly recorded and approved.
NOTE 4: Card files or similar systems that summarize key information are acceptable for use as
quick reference at the workbench provided that:
**NEW** 09/22/2021
COM.10050 Procedure Manual Elements Phase II
The procedure manual includes the following elements, when applicable to the test
procedure:
● Principle and clinical significance
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 24 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.10100 Policy and Procedure Review Phase II
The laboratory director or designee reviews all technical policies and procedures at least
every two years.
NOTE: The laboratory director must ensure that the collection of testing policies and technical
procedures is complete, current, and has been thoroughly reviewed by a knowledgeable person.
Technical approaches must be scientifically valid and clinically relevant.
To minimize the burden on the laboratory and reviewer(s), the CAP suggests using a schedule
whereby roughly 1/24 of all technical policies and procedures are reviewed monthly. Paper/
electronic signature review must be at the level of each procedure, or as multiple signatures on a
listing of named procedures. A single signature on a Title Page or Index is not a sufficient record
that each policy or procedure has been carefully reviewed. Signature or initials on each page of a
policy or procedure is not required.
The laboratory may record review of electronic procedures by:
● Including statements such as "reviewed by [name of reviewer] on [date of review]" in the
electronic record
● Using a secure electronic signature
● Using paper review sheets.
Only technical policies and procedures are addressed in this requirement. Biennial review is not
required for other controlled documents.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of policy or procedure review
NOTE: This review may not be delegated to designees in laboratories subject to the CLIA
regulations.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 25 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
COM.10250 New Policy and Procedure Approval (Not Subject to US Regulations) Phase II
For laboratories not subject to US regulations, the laboratory director or designee who
meets CAP director qualifications reviews and approves all new technical policies and
procedures, as well as substantial changes to existing documents before implementation.
NOTE: The form of this system is at the discretion of the laboratory director. Annual procedure
sign-off by testing personnel is not required.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records indicating that the testing personnel have read the policies and procedures, new
and revised, OR records of another written method approved by the laboratory director
NOTE: The laboratory must follow its document control system to archive discontinued policies
and procedures.
Discontinued policies and procedures must generally be inaccessible to the working areas of the
laboratory (GEN.20375).
For testing on minors (under the age of 21), stricter national, federal, state (or provincial), or local
laws and regulations may apply to retention of discontinued policies and procedures.
RESULTS REPORTING
NOTE: The laboratory must report reference intervals or interpretations with patient/client
results, where such exist to allow for proper interpretation of patient/client data. Age- and/or
sex-specific reference intervals or interpretive ranges must be reported with patient test results,
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 26 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
as applicable. In addition, the use of high and low flags is recommended. It is not necessary to
include reference intervals when test results are reported as part of a treatment protocol that
includes clinical actions, which are based on the test result (eg, activated clotting time in cardiac
surgery).
Under some circumstances it may be appropriate to distribute lists or tables of reference intervals
to all users and sites where reports are received. This system is acceptable if rigidly controlled.
**REVISED** 10/24/2022
COM.30000 Critical Result Notification Phase II
The laboratory immediately notifies physicians or other clinical personnel responsible
for patient care when results of designated tests exceed established "critical" values.
Records of notification are retained.
NOTE: Alert or critical results are those results that may require prompt clinical attention to avert
significant patient morbidity or mortality. The laboratory director, in consultation with the clinicians
served, must define the critical values and critical results that pertain to its patient population.
The laboratory may establish different critical results for specific patient subpopulations (for
example, dialysis clinic patients).
An appropriate notification includes a direct dialogue with the responsible individual or an
electronic communication (eg, secure email or fax) with confirmation of receipt by the responsible
individual.
For communication of significant and unexpected surgical pathology and cytopathology findings,
refer to ANP.12175 and CYP.06450 instead.
Allowing clinicians to "opt out" of receiving critical results is strongly discouraged.
Records must show prompt notification of critical results to the appropriate clinical individual and
include the following:
● Date of communication
● Time of communication
● Responsible individual communicating the result
● Person notified using identifiers traceable to that person (a first name alone is
inadequate)
● Test results.
Any problem encountered in accomplishing this task must be investigated to prevent recurrence.
Referral laboratories may report critical results directly to clinical personnel, or to the referring
laboratory. The referral laboratory must have a written agreement with the referring laboratory
that indicates to whom the referral laboratory reports critical results.
In the point-of-care setting, the identity of the testing individual and person notified need not be
recorded when the individual performing the test is the same person who treats the patient. In
this circumstance, however, there must be a record of the critical result, date, and time in the test
report or elsewhere in the medical record.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of notification within the established timeframe
NOTE: If critical results are transmitted electronically (eg, secure email or fax), the laboratory
must confirm receipt by the responsible individual; however, no read-back is necessary.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 27 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of critical result notification, including read-back as necessary
REAGENTS
NOTE: There is no requirement to routinely label individual containers with "date opened";
however, a new expiration date must be recorded if opening the container changes the expiration
date, storage requirement, etc.
If the manufacturer defines a required storage temperature range, the temperature of storage
areas must be monitored daily. Refer to the Temperature-Dependent Instruments, Equipment,
and Environment section of the checklist for requirements for monitoring and recording
temperature.
If the laboratory identifies a problem with a reagent that was used for patient testing (eg, expired
vial or reagent subjected to unacceptable storage conditions, etc.), the laboratory must evaluate
the potential impact on patient test results and retain records of the evaluation and actions taken.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of reagent storage and handling consistent with manufacturer's instructions,
including refrigerator, freezer and room temperature monitoring
The remaining checklist requirements in the REAGENTS section do not apply to waived tests.
NOTE: The above elements may be recorded in a log (paper or electronic), rather than on the
containers themselves, providing that all containers are identified so they are traceable to the
appropriate data in the log.
While useful for inventory management, labeling with "date received" is not routinely required.
There is no requirement to routinely label individual containers with "date opened"; however,
a new expiration date must be recorded if opening the container changes the expiration date,
storage requirement, etc. For containers with multiple individual reagent units (eg, cartridges), the
expiration date must be recorded on each unit if stored outside of the original container.
This requirement also applies to the labeling of chemicals used in the laboratory to prepare
reagents or during the preanalytic and analytic phases of the testing process. Requirements
relating to precautionary labeling for hazardous chemicals are included in the Chemical Safety
section of the Laboratory General Checklist.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Properly labeled reagents OR logs traceable to the reagents
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 28 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.30350 Reagent Storage and Handling - Nonwaived Tests Phase II
All reagents (chemicals, stains, controls, media, antibodies, test strips, testing cartridges,
etc.) are stored and handled as defined by the laboratory and following the manufacturer's
instructions.
NOTE: Reagents must be stored and handled in a manner that will prevent environmentally-
induced alterations that could affect reagent stability and test performance. Prepared reagents
must be properly stored, mixed, when appropriate, and discarded when stability parameters are
exceeded.
If the manufacturer defines a required storage temperature range, the temperature of storage
areas must be monitored daily. Refer to the Temperature-Dependent Instruments, Equipment,
and Environment section of the checklist for requirements for monitoring and recording
temperature.
If the laboratory identifies a problem with a reagent that was used for patient testing (eg, expired
vial or reagent subjected to unacceptable storage conditions, etc.), the laboratory must evaluate
the potential impact on patient test results and retain records of the evaluation and actions taken.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of reagent storage and handling consistent with manufacturer's instructions,
including refrigerator, freezer and room temperature monitoring
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.30400 Reagent Expiration Date - Nonwaived Tests Phase II
All reagents (chemicals, stains, controls, media, antibodies, test strips, testing cartridges,
etc.) are used within their indicated expiration date.
NOTE: Expiration dates assigned by a manufacturer must be observed. The laboratory must
assign an expiration date if an expiration date is not provided by the manufacturer. The
laboratory must base the assigned expiration date on known stability, frequency of use, storage
conditions, and risk of deterioration.
Transfusion service laboratories may use rare reagents (ie, rare antisera and selected panel red
cells to determine the specificity of red cell antigens and antibodies) beyond their expiration date
if appropriate positive and negative controls are run each day of use and react as expected. The
laboratory must have in-date reagents for routine antigen typing and antibody panel testing
For histology and cytology, laboratories may satisfy confirmation of ongoing acceptable
performance of stains until the expiration date by technical assessment of case material
containing suitable material for evaluation of stains, or by use of suitable control specimens.
Laboratories not subject to US regulations and military laboratories in overseas locations, may
use expired reagents only under the following circumstances: 1) The reagents are unique, rare
or difficult to obtain; or 2) Delivery of new shipments of reagents is delayed through causes
not under control of the laboratory. The laboratory must retain records of verification of the
performance of expired reagents in accordance with written laboratory procedure. The laboratory
must also retain records of its efforts to obtain reagents in a timely manner and the rationale for
continuing to perform the test instead of referring it to another laboratory.
Laboratories subject to US regulations must not use expired reagents.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records confirming acceptability of any reagent used beyond its expiration date (in
jurisdictions where allowed)
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 29 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
COM.30450 New Reagent Lot and Shipment Confirmation of Acceptability - Nonwaived Phase II
Tests
New reagent lots and shipments are checked against previous reagent lots or with
suitable reference material before or concurrently with being placed in service.
NOTE: This requirement applies to reagents that provide a chemical or biological reaction to
detect and/or measure a target analyte and would not apply to inert ingredients (eg, reagent
water, saline) or materials used for specimen preparation.
The purpose of this check is to confirm that the use of new analytic reagent lots and shipments
do not affect patient results. Matrix interferences between different lots of reagents may impact
the calibration status of instruments and consistency of patient results. Improper storage
conditions during shipping of reagents may have a negative impact on their ability to perform or
exhibit the same levels of reactivity as intended.
The minimum extent of the reagent check is described below; however, the check must be at
least as extensive as described in the manufacturer's instructions. The laboratory may determine
the number of specimens tested.
Qualitative: For qualitative nonwaived tests, minimum cross-checking includes retesting at least
one positive and negative specimen with known reactivity against the new reagent lot. Utilization
of a weakly positive specimen is recommended for confirmation of acceptability.
Examples of suitable reference materials for qualitative tests include:
A variety of instruments and equipment are used to support the performance of analytical procedures. Examples
of equipment include, but are not limited to centrifuges, microscopes, incubators, heat blocks, refrigerators,
freezers, biological safety cabinets, fume hoods, glassware, pipettes, etc. This section contains general
requirements that apply to most laboratory sections and types of testing. The laboratory is also responsible for
any additional instrument and equipment requirements found in the discipline-specific checklists, as applicable.
**REVISED** 10/24/2022
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 31 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
NOTE: The procedures must include steps to perform an emergency shutdown and handling
of workload during instrument downtime, as applicable. These may be separate approved
procedures or be included in the testing procedure for a specific analyte.
NOTE: Maintenance and function checks may include (but are not limited to) cleaning, electronic,
mechanical and operational checks.
The purpose of a function check is to detect drift, instability, or malfunction, before the problem is
allowed to affect test results.
For equipment without manufacturer's instructions defining maintenance and function check
requirements, the laboratory must establish a schedule and procedure that reasonably reflects
the workload and operating specifications of its equipment.
NOTE: The defined tolerance limits must follow the manufacturer's specified limits. Function
checks must be within the defined tolerance limits prior to use for testing patient samples.
The action related to tests that have an approved Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP)
must include an assessment of whether further evaluation of the risk assessment and quality
control plan is needed based on problems identified (eg, trending for repeat failures, etc.).
NOTE: Effective utilization of instruments and equipment by the technical staff depends upon the
prompt availability of the records (copies are acceptable) to detect trends or malfunctions. Off-
site storage, such as with centralized medical maintenance or computer files, is acceptable if the
inspector is satisfied that the records can be promptly retrieved.
Microscopes are clean, adequate (eg, low, high dry and oil immersion lenses as
appropriate for the intended use), optically aligned, and properly maintained with records
of preventive maintenance at least annually.
NOTE: Koehler illumination must be maintained for optimal resolution. Phase contrast
microscopy should be available when indicated (eg, manual platelet counting, urinalysis
microscopy).
NOTE: Having a process to track the length of time the bulb is in use and limit bulb usage based
on the manufacturer's recommendations (as applicable), is an example of an acceptable process
to monitor the adequacy of the source intensity.
The use of filters or slides not matched properly to the assay(s) performed can lead to erroneous
results. Written procedures must specify the excitation and emission filters used for fluorescence
microscopy. Fluorescence microscopes should be used in an area where ambient lighting can be
minimized.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of microscope monitoring
THERMOMETERS
NOTE: Thermometric standard devices must be recalibrated, recertified, or replaced prior to the
date of expiration of the guarantee of calibration or they are subject to requirements for non-
certified thermometers.
Thermometers should be periodically evaluated for damage (eg, separation of columns).
Thermometers with obvious damage must be rechecked for continued use.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Thermometer certificate of accuracy
TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENT INSTRUMENTS,
EQUIPMENT, AND ENVIRONMENTS
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.30750 Temperature Checks Phase II
The laboratory monitors and records temperatures using a calibrated thermometer as
defined in written procedure for the following:
● Temperature-dependent storage devices (eg, refrigerators, freezers, incubators)
● Temperature-dependent equipment (eg, water baths, heat blocks)
● Temperature-dependent environments (eg, ambient reagent or specimen storage,
conditions for instrument operation and test performance)
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.30775 Temperature Range Phase II
Acceptable ranges are defined for all temperature-dependent storage devices, equipment,
and environments (including test-dependent ambient temperature) in accordance with the
manufacturer's instructions.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Temperature log or record with defined acceptable range
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.30800 Temperature Corrective Action Phase II
The laboratory takes corrective action when acceptable temperature ranges for
temperature-dependent storage devices, equipment, and environments are exceeded,
including evaluation for adverse effects.
NOTE: If acceptable temperature ranges are exceeded, stored reagents, controls, calibrators,
or other materials must be checked to confirm the accuracy or quality of the material before use,
with records retained.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of corrective action for unacceptable temperatures
checked for accuracy and reproducibility initially and according to the manufacturer's
recommended interval, or at least annually if not specified, and the results are recorded.
NOTE: The following Table shows the American Society for Testing and Materials' calibration
(accuracy) specifications for Class A volumetric pipettes:
NOTE: The initial calibration may be performed by the manufacturer or other outside facility,
but in such cases the laboratory must have a record from the manufacturer or other facility that
includes the technique used to check calibration, the method of shipment to prevent damage
in transit, and the bias and precision of the pipette(s). The bias and imprecision must meet the
specification established by the laboratory.
If the facility performs pipette checks in house, they must be performed following manufacturer's
instructions, at minimum, and as defined in laboratory procedure. Such checks may be done
by gravimetric, colorimetric or other validation procedures. Alternative approaches include
spectrophotometry and the use of commercial kits.
For analytic instruments with integral automatic pipettors, this checklist requirement applies,
unless such checks are not practical for end-user laboratory. Manufacturers' recommendations
must be followed.
This requirement is not applicable for pre-calibrated inoculation loops that are used in the direct
plating of clinical specimens such as urine cultures.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of initial and ongoing verification of pipette accuracy and reproducibility
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 36 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
NOTE: In contrast with the more stringent accuracy requirements of glass pipettes, ASTM
requirements for plastic pipettes are ± 3% of the stated volume. The procedure manual must
specify when the use of non-class A measuring devices is permissible.
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.30840 Pipette Carryover Phase II
The laboratory evaluates its automatic pipetting systems for carryover.
NOTE: This requirement applies to both stand-alone pipette systems and to sample pipettes
integrated with analytic instruments.
One suggested method to study carryover is to run known high patient samples, followed by
known low samples to see if the results of the low-level material are affected. If carryover is
detected, the laboratory must determine the analyte concentration above which subsequent
samples may be affected, and define this value in the procedure. Results of each analytical run
must be reviewed to ensure that no results exceed this level. If results that exceed the defined
level are detected, then the appropriate course of action must be defined (repeat analysis of
subsequent samples, for example).
Carryover studies must be performed, as applicable, as part of the initial evaluation of an
instrument and be repeated after major maintenance or repair of the pipetting assembly of the
instrument. The laboratory may use the data from carryover studies performed by instrument
manufacturers, as appropriate.
In practice, carryover is a problem only for analytes with a wide clinical range of analyte
concentration, such that a minute degree of carry-over could have significant clinical implications.
Examples include immunoassays such as hCG, certain enzymes (eg, CK), and certain drugs of
abuse (eg, benzoylecgonine [cocaine metabolite], which may be present in high concentrations).
The laboratory should select representative examples of such analytes for carryover studies.
Evaluation for carryover is not required for automatic pipettes that use disposable tips.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Record of carryover studies, as applicable
ANALYTICAL BALANCES
An analytical balance is a class of balance designed to measure mass accurately in the milligram to sub-
milligram range. They are typically used for measuring chemicals used to prepare standards.
For other types of balances or weight measurement devices (eg, scales), refer to the Instrument and Equipment
Maintenance/Function Checks section and to discipline-specific requirements, as applicable (eg, ANP.32450 for
autopsy pathology, TRM.32200 for blood volume standardization).
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.30870 Analytical Balance Placement Phase I
Analytical balances are placed in locations that permit accurate and precise
measurements. If subject to vibrations that may interfere with readings, they are placed on
vibration-damping tables or surfaces.
NOTE: This requirement applies to analytical balances used to measure mass in the milligram
and sub-milligram range.
NOTE: The verification of accuracy of the analytical balance must be performed at a defined
interval to ensure accurate creation of analytical calibrators and/or weighed-in controls from
standard materials, as well as when gravimetrically checking the accuracy of pipettes.
Accuracy must be verified at least every six months if used for weighing materials to make
standard solutions for method calibration. Accuracy must be verified at the time of installation and
whenever a balance is moved. Acceptable ranges must be defined.
External verification of accuracy requires the appropriate class of ASTM specification weights.
ASTM Class 1 weights are appropriate for calibrating high precision analytical balances (0.01
to 0.1 mg limit of precision). ASTM Class 2 weights are appropriate for calibrating precision
top-loading balances (0.001 to 0.01 g precision). ASTM Class 3 weights are appropriate for
calibrating moderate precision balances, (0.01 to 0.1 g precision).
Laboratories located outside of the United States may use equivalent certified weights if ANSI/
ASTM class standard weights are not available.
NOTE: Weights must be well-maintained (covered when not in use, free of corrosion) and only be
handled by devices that will not leave residual contaminants on the weights. Certified weights will
only meet their specifications if maintained in pristine condition.
This section applies to waived testing performed following the manufacturer's instructions, without modification.
The current list of tests waived under CLIA may be found at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/
cfClia/analyteswaived.cfm.
**REVISED** 10/24/2022
COM.30980 Waived Test Implementation and Approval Phase II
The laboratory director or designee meeting CAP director qualifications approves the
introduction of new waived tests.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 38 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
NOTE: After initial approval, the introduction of additional identical waived instruments performing
identical previously approved waived tests does not require approval by the director or designee,
providing manufacturer instructions for instrument verification are followed and recorded.
Waived testing must be performed following the manufacturer's instructions. If the laboratory
modifies a waived test, the checklist requirements for high complexity testing apply, including the
requirements for validation of the method performance specifications.
The laboratory director's signature on the written test procedure may be used to show approval of
the test for use in patient testing.
This requirement also applies to tests with FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) specifically
designated by the FDA or other entities as designated by the US Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) Secretary for use in patient care settings in the EUA Letter of
Authorization. Such tests are deemed to be CLIA waived tests.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of test approval
NOTE: This section does not apply to waived tests performed following manufacturer's instructions.
ANALYTICAL VALIDATION/VERIFICATION
Analytical verification is the process by which a laboratory determines that an unmodified FDA-cleared/approved
test performs according to the specifications set forth by the manufacturer when used as directed. Analytical
validation is the process used to confirm with objective evidence that a laboratory-developed or modified FDA-
cleared/approved test method or instrument system delivers reliable results for the intended application. See
below for requirements for laboratories not subject to US regulations.
Laboratories are required to perform analytical validation or verification of each nonwaived test, method, or
instrument system before use in patient testing, regardless of when it was first introduced by the laboratory,
including instruments of the same make and model and temporary replacement (loaner) instruments. There
is no exception for analytical validation or verification of tests introduced prior to a specific date. The
laboratory must have data for the validation or verification of the applicable method performance specifications
and retain the records as long as the method is in use and for at least two years after discontinuation.
If an FDA-cleared or approved method was verified by someone other than the laboratory's personnel (eg,
manufacturer's representative), the laboratory must ensure that the verification correlates with its in-house test
performance by showing confirmation of performance specifications by laboratory personnel testing known
specimens.
The method performance specifications (ie, the applicable analytic performance characteristics of the test,
such as accuracy, precision, etc.) must be validated or verified in the location in which patient testing will be
performed. If an instrument is moved, the laboratory is responsible for determining that the method performance
specifications are not affected by the relocation process or any changes due to the new environment (eg,
refer to the manufacturer's manual regarding critical requirements, such as set-up limitations, environmental
conditions, etc.). The laboratory must follow manufacturer's instructions for instrument set up, maintenance,
and system verification. Separate requirements for verifying the performance of instruments and equipment
to confirm that they function according to expectations for the intended use and within the defined tolerance
limits are found in the Instrument and Equipment Maintenance and Function Checks section (COM.30550,
COM.30600).
QUALITATIVE TESTING
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 39 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
Not all method performance specifications apply to qualitative tests. For qualitative tests, the laboratory must
verify or establish the method performance specifications that are applicable and clinically relevant.
● For unmodified FDA-cleared or approved tests, the laboratory may use information from
manufacturers, or published literature, but the laboratory must verify such outside information
on accuracy, precision, reportable range, and reference intervals.
● For modified FDA-cleared or approved tests and laboratory-developed tests (LDTs), the
laboratory must establish accuracy, precision, analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity
(interferences), reportable range, and reference intervals, as applicable; data on interferences
may be obtained from manufacturers or published literature, as applicable.
LABORATORY-DEVELOPED TESTS:
For the purposes of interpreting the checklist requirements, a laboratory-developed test (LDT) is defined as
follows: A test used in patient management that has both of the following features:
1. The test is performed by the clinical laboratory in which the test was developed wholly or in part;
AND
2. The test is neither FDA-cleared nor FDA-approved (or, for laboratories not subject to US
regulations, the test is not approved by an internationally recognized regulatory authority).
Laboratories must verify the test method performance specifications as applicable to the test's FDA-designed
authorized setting, which can be found in the EUA Letter of Authorization.
● For tests authorized for use in a patient care setting, the laboratory must follow manufacturer's
instructions for waived test implementation (COM.30980) at minimum.
● For tests authorized for use in moderate or high complexity testing laboratories only, laboratories must
verify the test method performance specifications as defined in COM.40300 and follow manufacturer's
instructions for verification, if provided. While the objective is to fully verify the test method performance
specifications, a more limited approach is acceptable if sufficient numbers and types of positive
specimens and standard materials are unavailable (eg, early in an emergency disease outbreak, with
outbreaks that are geographically limited, or with agents that pose a particularly high biosafety risk).
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 40 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
Laboratories using an EUA assay must follow the assay or test system's protocol as authorized by the FDA
without modification, except for modifications allowed by the FDA. Note that the FDA and the CAP may require
studies prior to implementing certain modifications. The laboratory must document any alternative mechanism
employed to ensure accurate test results.
Under emergency conditions, sampling devices and transport media may become limited and it may be
necessary to obtain them from multiple sources. If EUA regulations specifically address these items, the
laboratory must follow them. Otherwise, the laboratory director or designee meeting CAP director qualifications
has discretion to determine which devices and media are acceptable for use; a full, formal verification study for
each device or media is not necessarily required, but the laboratory must have defined criteria for specimen
acceptance.
Information on current EUA assays can be found on the FDA website (www.fda.gov).
Laboratories not subject to US regulations may use US FDA EUA assays or other types of assays (eg, World
Health Organization Emergency Use Listing) as allowed by national, federal, state (or provincial), or local
regulations.
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.40300 Verification of Test Performance Specifications - FDA-cleared/approved Phase II
Tests
Prior to clinical use of each unmodified FDA-cleared or approved test, the laboratory has
performed a verification study and prepared a written assessment of each of the following
test method performance specifications, as applicable, using a sufficient number of
characterized samples:
1. Analytical accuracy
2. Analytical precision
3. Reportable range
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 41 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
NOTE 1: This requirement also applies to tests with FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) in
moderate or high complexity testing laboratory settings.
NOTE 2: Accuracy is verified by comparing results to a definitive or reference method, or
an established comparative method. Use of matrix-appropriate reference materials, patient
specimens (altered or unaltered), or other commutable materials with known concentrations
or activities may be used to verify accuracy. The use of routine quality control materials or
calibrators used to calibrate the method is not appropriate.
NOTE 3: Precision is verified by repeat measurement of samples at varying concentrations/
activities within run and between run over a period of time.
NOTE 4: The reportable range of an assay is the range of test result values over which the
laboratory has verified accuracy of the instrument or test system measurement response.
NOTE 5: If multiple identical instruments or devices are in use, there must be records (data and
written assessment) showing that the method performance specifications have been separately
verified for each test and instrument or device.
NOTE 6: If a method is verified by someone other than the laboratory's personnel (eg,
manufacturer's representative), the laboratory must have records to show that the verification
correlates with its in-house test performance by showing confirmation of performance
specifications by the laboratory personnel testing known specimens.
NOTE 7: The requirement for a written assessment applies to all tests implemented after June
15, 2009; however, all nonwaived tests must have records of completed analytical verification,
regardless of the implementation date. The written assessment must include an evaluation of
each component of the verification study, including the acceptability of the data. If data include
discordant results, there must be a record of the discordance and investigation of any impact on
the approval of the test for clinical use.
Templates for analytical verification written assessment can be found on cap.org in e-LAB
Solutions Suite - Accreditation Resources - Templates.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of verification and written assessment of each component of the test method
performance specifications for each test
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.40350 Validation of Test Performance Specifications - Modified FDA-cleared/ Phase II
approved Tests and LDTs
Prior to clinical use of each modified FDA-cleared or approved test and laboratory-
developed tests (LDTs), the laboratory has performed a validation study and prepared a
written assessment of each of the following test method performance specifications, as
applicable, using a sufficient number of characterized samples:
● Analytical accuracy
● Analytical precision
● Reportable range
● Analytical sensitivity (lower detection limit)
● Analytical specificity
● Any other performance characteristic required to ensure analytical test
performance
NOTE 1: For laboratories not subject to US regulations, this requirement also applies to:
● Tests that are not approved by an internationally recognized regulatory authority
● Approved tests that have been modified by the laboratory
NOTE 2: Accuracy is validated by comparing results to a definitive or reference method, or
an established comparative method. Use of matrix-appropriate reference materials, patient
specimens (altered or unaltered), or other commutable materials with known concentrations
or activities may be used to validate accuracy. The use of routine quality control materials or
calibrators used to calibrate the method is not appropriate.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 43 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of validation and written assessment of each component of the test method
performance specifications
NOTE: This checklist requirement is applicable only to nonwaived tests implemented after June
15, 2009; however, all nonwaived tests must have records of completed analytical validation or
verification, regardless of their implementation date.
The approval must include: 1) review of the written assessment of the validation or verification
study, including the acceptability of the data and investigation of any discordant results; 2)
signed approval statement, such as, "I have reviewed the verification (or validation) data for
the performance specifications listed below for the (insert instrument/test name), and the
performance of the method is considered acceptable for patient testing."
If a validation or verification study (accuracy, precision, reportable range, etc.) was not performed
or is missing required components, the appropriate, related checklist requirements must also be
cited (eg, COM.40300, COM.40350).
If multiple identical instruments or devices are in use, there must be records (data and written
assessment) showing that the method performance specifications have been separately
validated/verified for each test and instrument or device.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of approval of validation and verification studies and approval for clinical use
NOTE: Interfering substances may pose a significant problem to the clinical laboratory and
healthcare providers who may be misled by laboratory results that do not reflect patient clinical
status. The laboratory must be aware of common interferences by performing studies or
referencing studies performed elsewhere (such as by the instrument-reagent manufacturer).
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Document listing known interferences for each test and plan of action when they are present
NOTE: Reference intervals are important to allow a clinician to assess patient results against an
appropriate population. The reference intervals must be established or verified for each analyte
and specimen source (eg, blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid), when appropriate. For example, a
reference interval can be verified by testing samples from 20 healthy representative individuals;
if no more than two results fall outside the proposed reference interval, that interval can be
considered verified for the population studied.
If a formal reference interval study is not possible or practical, then the laboratory should carefully
evaluate the use of published data for its own reference intervals, and retain records of this
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 45 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
evaluation. For many analytes (eg, therapeutic drugs, cholesterol, and CSF total protein),
literature references or a manufacturer's package insert information may be appropriate.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Record of reference interval study OR records of verification of manufacturer's stated interval
when reference interval study is not practical (eg, unavailable normal population) OR other
methods approved by the laboratory/section director
NOTE: This requirement applies directly to body fluid testing that the laboratory offers as a
routine, orderable test. If the test is routinely performed on the fluid, there must be a written
procedure. The requirement COM.40475 for a method validation or verification approval applies.
Method performance specifications for blood specimens may be used for body fluids if the
laboratory can reasonably exclude the existence of matrix interferences affecting the latter either
by reference in the procedure manual to published literature or by evaluation for interferences
due to matrix effects by performing an appropriate study (eg, a dilution study using admixtures
of samples, spiking samples, further dilution). Alternative performance assessment is required
(COM.01500) and may be performed using clinical assessment by chart review.
The reference intervals must be defined and reported with the results, unless the concentration
of the analyte is reported in comparison to its concentration in a contemporaneously collected
blood specimen. If the result is to be interpreted by comparison to the patient's blood, serum,
or plasma, such results must be accompanied by an appropriate comment such as, "The
reference interval(s) and other method performance specifications are unavailable for this
body fluid. Comparison of this result with the concentration in the blood, serum, or plasma is
recommended." Reference interval citations from the manufacturer's insert or published literature
citations may be used to determine the reference interval (COM.40605). However, reference
intervals have not been published for many body fluid analytes and obtaining normal fluids to
establish reference intervals may not be feasible.
A request for a test on a body fluid specimen that is not listed on the laboratory's test menu that
requires clearance by the section director or designee is considered a clinically unique specimen,
rather than a routine, orderable test. Typically, these specimens are submitted due to an unusual
clinical concern in a specific patient or situation (eg, pathologic states where the analyte is not
normally found in the fluid type) and it may not be possible to establish a comparative metric. In
such cases, the result must be accompanied by a comment such as, "The reference interval(s)
and other method performance specifications have not been established for this body fluid. The
test result must be integrated into the clinical context for interpretation."
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 46 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of validation or verification studies with evaluation and approval AND
✓ Records of reference interval study OR records of verification of manufacturer's stated
interval or published literature OR other methods approved by the laboratory/section director
**NEW** 09/22/2021
COM.40625 Clinical Claims Validation - FDA-cleared/approved Tests Phase II
For FDA-cleared/approved tests, the laboratory validates clinical claims not included in
the manufacturer's instructions.
NOTE: For laboratories not subject to US regulations, this requirement also applies to tests that
are approved by an internationally recognized regulatory authority.
A clinical claim is a communication from the laboratory to its users (including but not limited
to clinicians and patients) regarding a test's sensitivity and specificity, predictive values for a
disease or condition, clinical usefulness, cost-effectiveness or clinical utility.
To adequately support a clinical claim, the laboratory must perform a clinical validation
study, unless the clinical validity of the test is documented in peer-reviewed literature or
textbooks. The clinical validation study must include at least 20 samples and must include both
positive and negative samples. If the laboratory uses fewer samples, the laboratory director or
designee meeting CAP director qualifications must record the criteria used to determine the
appropriateness of the sample size.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of clinical studies performed by the laboratory OR peer-reviewed literature that
reasonably substantiates all claims made by the laboratory about a test
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.40640 Clinical Performance Characteristics Validation - Laboratory-developed Phase II
Tests
The laboratory validates clinical performance characteristics for laboratory-developed
tests.
NOTE: Clinical performance characteristics include statements about a test's sensitivity and
specificity, and may include determining predictive values for relevant disease(s) or condition(s),
as applicable.
These characteristics must be established by the laboratory unless the clinical validity of the test
is documented in peer-reviewed literature or textbooks. The clinical validation study must include
at least 20 samples and must include both positive and negative samples. If the laboratory
uses fewer samples, the laboratory director must record the criteria used to determine the
appropriateness of the sample size.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records of clinical studies performed by the laboratory OR peer-reviewed literature that
reasonably substantiates all claims made by the laboratory about a test
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.40700 Method Performance Specifications Availability Phase II
For current test methods, the laboratory makes the following available to clients and the
inspection team upon request:
● Summary of the analytical performance specifications for each method, validated
or verified by the laboratory to include analytical accuracy, precision, analytical
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 47 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
NOTE: Information may be provided to clients in a summary format referring to the supporting
data, statistics, and published studies, as appropriate. Clients include healthcare entities, other
laboratories, and licensed independent practitioners. This requirement does not apply to patients
or their authorized representatives.
The laboratory may require clients to treat the data as confidential and not to use such
proprietary information for its own test development or share such data with any other party
except as required by law. The CAP inspection team is instructed to treat all such data as
confidential and to review them solely for accreditation purposes.
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.40800 Analytical Methodology Changes Phase II
If the laboratory changes its analytical methodology so that test results or their
interpretations may be significantly different, the change is explained to clients.
NOTE: This requirement can be accomplished in any of several different ways, depending on
local circumstances. Some methods include directed mailings, laboratory newsletters or part of
the test report itself.
Common examples of assays where changes to the method may significantly affect results
include tumor markers and high-sensitivity troponin assays.
Evidence of Compliance:
✓ Records such as directed mailings, laboratory newsletters or comment on the patient report
advising of the change
**REVISED** 09/22/2021
COM.40805 Intermittent or Seasonal Testing Phase II
For tests taken out of production for a period of time (eg, seasonal testing for influenza),
the laboratory meets the following requirements prior to resuming patient testing, as
applicable:
1. PT or alternative assessment performed within 30 days prior to restarting
patient testing
2. Method performance specifications verified, as applicable, within 30 days prior
to restarting patient testing
3. Competency assessed for analysts within 12 months prior to restarting patient
testing
NOTE: A test is considered to be taken out of production when (1) patient testing is not offered
AND (2) PT or alternative assessment, as applicable, is suspended. It does not apply to
situations where a proficiency testing challenge is not performed due to a temporary, short-term
situation, such as a reagent back order or an instrument breakdown. In those situations, the
laboratory must perform alternative assessment for that testing event.
For tests for which PT is required by CAP, if a PT challenge is not offered during the 30-day
period prior to restarting patient testing, the laboratory may perform an alternative assessment
of the test. The laboratory must participate in the next scheduled PT event, if the Laboratory
Accreditation Program requires external PT for that analyte.
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 48 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
NOTE: For laboratories not subject to US regulations, the list must also include tests approved by
an internationally recognized regulatory authority that have been modified by the laboratory.
A form is available on the CAP website that may be used for maintaining this list and can be
downloaded from the CAP website (cap.org) through e-LAB Solutions Suite.
NOTE: The procedures must define the frequency, number, and concentration of calibrators and
controls to be used.
For laboratories not subject to US regulations, this requirement also applies to tests that are not
approved by an internationally recognized regulatory authority and to approved tests that have
been modified by the laboratory.
NOTE: For laboratories subject to US regulations, the following disclaimer statement must be
included on the patient report: "This test was developed and its performance characteristics
determined by <insert laboratory/company name>. It has not been cleared or approved by the
US Food and Drug Administration."
Laboratories not subject to US regulations do not need to use the above disclaimer but must
include a statement that the test was developed by the laboratory.
The laboratory may put a single disclaimer on the patient report for all studies (eg, immunostains,
in situ hybridization, or flow cytometry) collectively used in a particular case. Separately tracking
each reagent used for a case and selectively applying the disclaimer is unnecessary.
The CAP also recommends (but does not require) including additional information in the patient
report, such as the following:
● The FDA does not require this test to go through premarket FDA review.
● This test is used for clinical purposes. It should not be regarded as investigational or for
research.
● This laboratory is certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments
(CLIA) as qualified to perform high complexity clinical laboratory testing.
This requirement does not apply to laboratory-developed tests that are traditional methods, such
as manual microscopy, conventional microbiologic cultures, conventional cytogenetics, and
manual hematology and immunology tests.
The FDA defines ASRs as reagents (eg, antibodies, both polyclonal and monoclonal, specific
receptor proteins, ligands, nucleic acid sequences), which through specific binding or chemical
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 49 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
reaction with substances in a specimen are intended for use in a diagnostic application for
identification and quantification of an individual chemical substance or ligand in biological
specimens.
An ASR is the manufacturer-provided active ingredient in a laboratory-developed test system.
Class I ASRs are not subject to preclearance by the US Food and Drug Administration or to
special controls by the FDA. When manufacturers have assembled ingredients towards the
development of a test, the product is no longer an ASR. The following types of reagents do not
meet the FDA's definition of an ASR: reagents that are sold in kit form with other materials and/or
an instrument, and/or with instructions for use, and/or when labeled by the manufacturer as Class
I for in vitro diagnostic use (IVD), Class II IVD, or Class III IVD.
A class I ASR is the manufacturer-provided active ingredient in a laboratory-developed test
system. Class I devices are those classified by the FDA as posing the lowest patient risk.
Class I ASRs are therefore exempt from FDA clearance/approval. A class I ASR is provided by
the manufacturer as a single reagent and is not combined with other materials, nor does the
manufacturer provide instructions for use.
Reagents subject to FDA clearance or approval are not class I ASRs; therefore, this checklist
requirement does not apply. Examples include:
● Reagents that are sold as kits in combination with other materials and/or an instrument,
or with manufacturer's instructions for use
● Class I, II and III products labeled "for in vitro diagnostic use (IVD)"
This section applies to laboratories using an IQCP approved by the laboratory director for nonwaived testing
to reduce external control analysis to a frequency less than the limits defined in the CLIA regulations and CAP
checklists. Laboratories are not required to implement an IQCP; however, one is required if the laboratory
decides to perform QC at a frequency less than specified in the CLIA regulations. A laboratory may not
implement an IQCP that allows for quality control to be performed less frequently than indicated in the
manufacturer's instructions. This section does not apply if the type and frequency of external quality control
already meets or exceeds minimum quality control requirements defined in the CLIA regulations and CAP
checklist requirements.
If a laboratory is located in a state that does not accept IQCP as an option for reducing the frequency of external
quality control, the laboratory must follow the state regulations and perform external quality control following the
frequency defined in the state regulations and CAP checklists.
Eligibility for use of an IQCP is limited to testing meeting all of the following criteria:
Testing performed using microbiology media and reagents used for microbial identification and susceptibility
testing is eligible for IQCP as defined in the Microbiology Checklist.
IQCP requirements do not apply to waived testing. A search tool is available on the FDA website to confirm
the complexity of tests performed and can be accessed at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/
cfCLIA/search.cfm
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 50 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
The CAP has a variety of tools available on cap.org through e-LAB Solutions Suite under Accreditation
Resources, IQCP Toolbox, including frequently asked questions, examples, forms, and links to CMS and CDC
resources.
Note that development of an IQCP only impacts quality control requirements. All other checklist requirements
remain unchanged and applicable. For a listing of specialties/subspecialties and general regulations which
are designated as "eligible" for IQCP refer to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid State Operations Manual
(www.cms.gov) interpretive guidelines for regulation 42CFR493.1256(d), Table 1: Eligibility for IQCP.
NOTE: The form may be downloaded from cap.org through e-LAB Solutions Suite under
Accreditation Resources, IQCP Toolbox.
The use of the CAP form is required, even if standardized forms and templates are used by the
laboratory.
NOTE: The risk assessment must include a process to identify the sources of potential failures
and errors for a testing process, and evaluate frequency and impact of those failures and sources
of error.
The laboratory director must consider the laboratory's clinical and legal responsibilities for
providing accurate and reliable patient test results. Published data and information may be used
to supplement the risk assessment but are not substitutes for the laboratory's own studies and
evaluation. The laboratory must involve a representative sample of testing personnel in the
process of conducting the risk assessment. It is not necessary for all personnel to be involved.
The risk assessment for laboratories with multiple identical devices must show that an
evaluation was performed if there are differences in testing personnel or environments
where testing is performed, with customization of the quality control plan, as needed.
The QC study to assess the performance and stability of the tests must support the QC
frequency and elements defined in the laboratory's quality control plan. At a minimum, the
study must include laboratory data representing the maximum interval between runs of external
quality control. Consecutive days of data collection are not specifically required if testing is done
sporadically, or is not performed seven days a week. Laboratories may use historical data for
tests already in place, and may supplement the study with data from published literature. For
new tests, devices, and instruments introduced into the laboratory, the laboratory must collect in-
house data and may need to define a more frequent QC interval until sufficient data is available
Texas Health Hospital Frisco
Laboratory 51 of 52
All Common Checklist 10.24.2022
to support a longer time interval between runs of external QC. For susceptibility testing guidance,
refer to MIC.21910.
For affiliated laboratories (eg, systems) with integrated procedures, each accredited laboratory
must have its own IQCP approved by the laboratory director. There must be records
demonstrating that risks specific to the site were evaluated involving a representative sample of
local testing personnel to conduct the risk assessment and that laboratory-specific QC data were
used in the study to support the defined frequency of quality control. Laboratories may use data
from other sites to supplement risk assessments and to support their findings.
NOTE: The quality control plan may be part of a test procedure or be a separate written plan.
As an efficiency, a single plan may address multiple tests performed on one device. A separate,
quality control plan approved by the laboratory director must be in place for each laboratory with
a separate CAP and CLIA number.
NOTE: The components of the quality control plan must meet regulatory and CAP accreditation
requirements and be in compliance with the manufacturer instructions, at minimum. The quality
control plan must control the quality of the test process and ensure accurate and reliable test
results.
External control material samples must be analyzed with new lots and shipments of reagents or
more frequently if indicated in the manufacturer's instructions.
NOTE: If ongoing assessments identify failures in one or more components of the quality control
plan, the laboratory must investigate the cause and consider if modifications are needed to the
quality control plan to mitigate potential risk. Common examples of failures include unacceptable
proficiency testing results, recurrent out-of-range reagent storage or room temperatures,
unacceptable quality control results, use of unvalidated specimen types, and the IQCP not being
followed as written.
An example form is available on cap.org through e-LAB Solutions Suite under Accreditation
Resources, IQCP Toolbox that may be used for recording ongoing assessments of the IQCP.