Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Civil Pro (Pre-Test)

    Uploaded by

    ZL ZL
    The document contains 10 multiple choice questions about principles of civil procedure in the Philippines, including anticipatory breach, jurisdiction, joinder of causes of action, necessary and indispensable parties. Specifically, it asks about when objection to jurisdiction can be made, the appellate powers of the Court of Appeals, whether foreclosure and collection cases can be joined, and if non-joinder of indispensable parties is grounds for dismissal.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Civil Pro (Pre-Test)

    Uploaded by

    ZL ZL
    18 views2 pages
    The document contains 10 multiple choice questions about principles of civil procedure in the Philippines, including anticipatory breach, jurisdiction, joinder of causes of action, necessary and indispensable parties. Specifically, it asks about when objection to jurisdiction can be made, the appellate powers of the Court of Appeals, whether foreclosure and collection cases can be joined, and if non-joinder of indispensable parties is grounds for dismissal.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    civil pro(pre-test)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document contains 10 multiple choice questions about principles of civil procedure in the Philippines, including anticipatory breach, jurisdiction, joinder of causes of action, necessary and indispensable parties. Specifically, it asks about when objection to jurisdiction can be made, the appellate powers of the Court of Appeals, whether foreclosure and collection cases can be joined, and if non-joinder of indispensable parties is grounds for dismissal.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    18 views2 pages

    Civil Pro (Pre-Test)

    Uploaded by

    ZL ZL
    The document contains 10 multiple choice questions about principles of civil procedure in the Philippines, including anticipatory breach, jurisdiction, joinder of causes of action, necessary and indispensable parties. Specifically, it asks about when objection to jurisdiction can be made, the appellate powers of the Court of Appeals, whether foreclosure and collection cases can be joined, and if non-joinder of indispensable parties is grounds for dismissal.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    PRE-TEST

    REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW I


    ATTY. ZEHAN LOREN E. TOCAO- TALIPASAN, REB

    I. What is the principle of anticipatory breach?


    II. When should objection to jurisdiction over the subject matter be
    made? Can it be tackled motu propio for the first time on appeal?
    III. Does the Court of Appeals have the power to try cases and conduct
    hearings, receive evidence and perform acts necessary to resolve
    factual issues?
    IV. Is an action for foreclosure of a real estate mortgage an action
    incapable of pecuniary estimation?
    V. A filed a complaint against B for collection of sum of money
    amounting to Php 400,000.00 before the Regional Trial Court.
    However, after the trial the Court found that the liability is only up
    to Php 350,000.00 only hence it rendered judgment dismissing the
    case for lack of jurisdiction. Is the Court action valid?
    VI. N sued S for injuries he suffered when S drove his car recklessly
    and bumped into N. S confessed judgment and was adjudged to
    pay Php 5,000.00. N became blind because of the injuries he
    sustained in the accident. He filed another suit against S this time
    for P 100,000.00 May S plead the filing of the first complaint in
    abatement of the second suit and contend that the judgment on the
    merits in the first case constitutes a bar in the second?
    VII. A files a collection suit against B. In the same complaint he included
    a petition for judicial foreclosure of mortgage.Is joiner proper?
    VIII. A, a Manila resident, filed a complaint against B, a resident of Iloilo
    City. In the RTC of Manila. The complaint joins causes of action:
    one for collection of Php 500,000.00 and the other for title to real
    property in Iloilo City with an assessed value of Php 20,000.00, both
    cause of action being unrelated to each other. Was there a proper
    joinder of causes of action?
    IX. Is the non-joinder of necessary party or indispensable party a
    ground for motion to dismiss?
    X. O sold a parcel of land to B. Subsequently O sold and delivered the
    same parcel of land to C, who filed with the RTC an application for
    original registration of the land. The application was granted and an
    original certificate of title (OCT) was issued in the name of C. B filed
    an action for reconveyance against C. Judgment was rendered in
    favor of B. On appeal, C argued that B should have impleaded the
    seller O who is an indispensable party. Is C‟s argument correct?

    -end-

    You might also like