Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Eric Ed431596
Eric Ed431596
ABSTRACT
The information provided in this booklet is meant to give
the necessary background information so that the science of black holes can
be taught confidently to secondary students. The featured activities can be
used to engage and excite students about the topic of black holes in
different disciplines and in a number of ways. Activities include: (1) Model
a Black Hole; (2) Tin Foil, Balloons, and Black Holes; (3) Gravity Is as
Gravity Does; (4) Testing Einstein 101; (5) Crossing the Event Horizon; (6)
How Much Do You Know?; (7) Inevitable Mathematics; and (8) So, You Want to Be
a Black Hole? A poster and a CD-ROM accompany this guide. (WRM)
********************************************************************************
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made
from the original document.
********************************************************************************
ili.n.111),Ak`),J+0
1110
1111 flo
Written by
This booklet, along with its matching poster, is meant to be used in conjunction with the
IMAGINE ME UNIVERSE! Web site or CD-ROM.
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Table of Contents i
Preface 1
Answers 21
Glossary 25
Related Resources 27
4 1
National Mathematics and Science Content Standards
for the Activities in this Booklet
All Standards are for Grades 9-12
NSES NCTM
5
How Much Do You Know?
Inevitable Mathematics
6
iv
Preface
WELCOME to the second in a series of posters and activity booklets produced in
conjunction with the Imagine the Universe! Web site. The poster/booklet sets are intended to
provide additional curriculum support materials for some of the subjects presented in the
Web site. The information provided for the educator in the booklet is meant to give the
necessary background information so that the topic can be taught confidently to students. The
activities can be used to engage and excite students about the topic of black holes in a
number of disciplines and ways. All activities can be photocopied and distributed for
educational, non-commercial purposes!
For additional materials and information, visit the Imagine the Universe! Web site at
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/. We also look forward to hearing your opinions about this
poster/booklet set! Our email address is [email protected].
7
1
The Anatomy of Black Holes
I. Welcome to an Amazing Universe
Black holes exert a strong pull on both the scientific and the popular imaginations. They
often prove beyond the limits of our abilities to comprehend. Indeed, they sound like a lot of
nonsense from a bad movie. Nevertheless, black holes have gone from being a "purely
theoretical fancy" to being the objects of cutting-edge scientific study. We have strong
evidence that black holes not only exist, but may exist in the centers of every galaxy. We
have a good theory, general relativity, that describes what happens around a black hole. It is a
theory which completely overturned our commonplace notion of space and time, and
nowhere do we see its amazing conclusions so strikingly as around black holes. Through a
study of black holes, we will begin to piece together our picture of the fundamental physics
of spacetime. And no doubt, the Universe will hold many surprises for us in our quest!
Let us begin our journey with a brief discussion of the difference between the world as we
experience it in our everyday lives (the Newtonian world), and the world we must enter in
order to understand the superstrong gravity which leads to a black hole (the world of
Einstein). Let us consider what is experienced by a person standing on the surface of a non-
rotating moon. According to the Newtonian view, the gravitational force this person is
subjected to is proportional to the product of the moon's mass and the person's mass, and
inversely proportional to the squared radius of the moon. Einstein's view of gravity would
yield a value of the force slightly greater than Newton's value ("slightly" is a word we will
define later). Let us suppose that the moon is now magically crushed. Its radius becomes
smaller and smaller while its mass remains constant. According to Newton, contraction by a
factor of two increases the force by a factor of four. Einstein predicts that the force increases
slightly faster (there is that word again slight/A So in fact, the smaller the radius of the
moon, the greater the difference between the force predicted by Newton and that predicted by
Einstein. According to Newton, as the size of the moon tends toward a point, gravitational
force tends toward infinity. According to Einstein, infinite gravitational force occurs as the
radius of the moon approaches the so-called "gravitational radius" of the body (which can be
far from being point-size). The size of the gravitational radius is determined by the amount of
mass: the smaller the mass, the smaller the gravitational radius. For Earth, the gravitational
radius is about 1 centimeter; for the Sun, its is about 3 kilometers. Thus, we come to the heart
of the difference between Newton's view of gravity and Einstein's: if the actual size of an
object is much larger than its gravitational radius, the differences in the gravitational force
calculated by the two theories is extremely small. (On the Earth's surface, for example, the
difference is one billionth of the value of the force a very slight difference indeed!). Only
when the compressed radius of the object approaches its gravitational radius do the values
calculated by the two theories begin to differ significantly...and the value given by Einstein's
theory proves to be the correct one.
8
2
II. Introduction to Black Holes
Only in the last few decades as astronomers started looking at the Universe in radio, infrared,
ultraviolet, X-ray, and gamma-ray light have we learned very much about black holes.
However, the concept of a black hole has been around for over 200 years. English clergyman
John Michell suggested in 1784 that some stars might be so big that light could never escape
from them. A few years later, French mathematician Pierre Simon de Laplace reached the
same conclusion. Michell and Laplace both based their work on the ideas about gravity put
forth by Isaac Newton in 1687. Newton had said that objects on Earth fall to the ground as a
result of an attraction called gravity. The more massive (heavier) an object is, the greater its
pull of gravity. Thus, an apple would fall to Earth. His theory of gravity ruled unchallenged
until 1915 when Einstein's general theory of relativity appeared. Instead of regarding gravity
as a force, Einstein looked at it as a distortion of space itself.
Shortly after the announcement of Einstein's theory, German physicist Karl Schwarzschild
discovered that the relativity equations led to the predicted existence of a dense object into
which other objects could fall, but out of which no objects could ever come. (Today, thanks
to American physicist John Wheeler, we call such an object a "black hole") Schwarzschild
predicted a "magic sphere" around such an object where gravity is so powerful that nothing
can move outward. This distance has been named the Schwarzschild radius. It is also often
referred to as the event horizon, because no information about events occurring inside this
distance can ever reach us. The event horizon can be said to mark the surface of the black
hole, although in truth the black hole is the singularity in the center of the event horizon
sphere. Unable to withstand the pull of gravity, all material is crushed until it becomes a
point of infinite density occupying virtually no space. This point is known as the singularity.
Every black hole has a singularity at its center.
Ignoring the differences introduced by rotation, we can say that to be inevitably drawn into a
black hole, one has to cross inside the Schwarzschild radius. At this radius, the escape speed
is equal to the speed of light; therefore, once light passes through, even it cannot escape.
Wonderfully, the Schwarzschild radius can be calculated using the Newtonian equation for
escape velocity
Vesc = (2GM/R)1/2.
For photons, or objects with no mass, we can substitute c (the speed of light) for Vesc and find
the Schwarzschild radius, R, to be
R = 2GM/c2.
This equation implies to us that any object with mass M can become a black hole if it can
achieve a radius of R!
3
A. Rack oles Come in All Sizes (Masses).
Black holes can be said to "come in all sizes", meaning that they have a wide range of
masses. There are at least two different types of black holes. The types differ by their masses.
We are perhaps most familiar with "stellar-size black holes"; these are the black holes which
form from the death of a very massive single star. They tend to have masses in the range of a
few to a few tens of solar masses. Next, there are what are called the "supermassive black
holes"; these objects have the mass of a few billion to hundreds of billions of solar masses.
They exist in the centers of galaxies.
The most common types of black holes have a mass of between about four and a few tens of
solar masses. They are the remains of supernovae the explosions of massive stars. To
understand how such black holes can form, let us briefly review the life cycle of a massive
star.
For stars some 10 or more times as massive as our Sun, fate has something very special in
store when they begin to run out of hydrogen to fuse into helium. After the outer layers of the
star have swollen into a red supergiant (i.e., a very big red giant), the core begins to yield to
gravity and starts to shrink. As it shrinks, it grows hotter and denser, and a new series of
nuclear reactions begin to occur, temporarily halting the collapse of the core. However, when
the core becomes essentially just iron, it has nothing left to fuse (because the nuclear
structure of iron does not permit its atoms to fuse into heavier elements) and fusion ceases. In
less than a second, the star begins the final phase of its gravitational collapse. The core
temperature rises to over 100 billion Kelvin as the iron atoms are crushed together. The
repulsive force between the nuclei overcomes the force of gravity, and the core recoils out
from the heart of the star in an explosive shock wave.
So what, if anything, remains of the core of the original star? Unlike in smaller stars, where
the core becomes essentially all carbon and stable, the intense pressure inside the supergiant
causes the electrons to be combined with the protons, forming neutrons. In fact, the whole
core of the star becomes nothing but a dense ball of neutrons. It is possible that this core will
remain intact after the supernova, and be called a neutron star. However, if the original star
was very massive (say 10 or more times the mass of our Sun), even the neutrons will not be
able to withstand the core collapse and a black hole will form.
Such black holes may exist all by themselves in the vast reaches of space, or may be part of a
binary system of stars. There are certain conditions under which a star can start out in a
binary system (the usual condition for a star), undergo a supernova explosion, and yet still
remain locked into the binary system. It is possible in such systems that there will be a flow
of gas from the outer layers of the normal star into the gravitational field of the black hole
4
10
companion. This gas cannot simply fall onto the black hole, the orbital motion of the pair of
stars will make it go into rotation and form a disk around the black hole. Friction between the
disk components will heat the gas to 10,000,000 Kelvin before it reaches the event horizon,
and a gas of such temperature emits X-rays.
We now have objects called quasars, Seyferts, and blazars...all of which we believe may be
galaxies with supermassive black holes in their centers. In fact, one currently popular model
states that these three types of objects are all the same type of object (a regular galaxy with
an active center due to accretion onto a supermassive black hole) viewed from different
angles.
The closest possible black hole to us will be a stellar-mass black hole. A stellar-mass black
hole requires a massive progenitor. The nearest such star is tens of light-years away. The
event horizon of such a back hole is at most a few tens of kilometers in diameter. Thus, the
angular size of this hypothetical black hole is 0.00000001 seconds of arc. Bottom line: a
black hole floating alone in space would be hard, if not impossible, to see. Nevertheless,
there is now a great deal of observational evidence for the existence of both stellar-mass and
supermassive black holes. How has this happened?
If a black hole passes through a cloud of interstellar matter, or is close to another "normal"
star, the black hole can accrete matter into itself. As the matter is pulled towards the black
hole, it gains kinetic energy, heats up, and is squeezed by tidal forces. As it gets hotter, its
peak radiation moves progressively through the ultraviolet, X-ray, and gamma-ray
wavelengths. In fact, we expect X-ray emission to occur just before the matter crosses the
Schwarzschild radius, and can use this radiation to probe the most extreme environments of
gravity, density, temperature, and velocity. However, it is not as simple as this may sound.
ii 5
To search for X-ray emission from black hole binary systems was first suggested in 1966 by
Igor Novikov and Yakov Zel'dovich not long after the discovery of the first cosmic X-ray
sources. Ever since, a "signature" in the emission properties of a source to classify it as a
black hole (versus a white dwarf or neutron star) has been sought. We know that the mass
calculated for the condensed star must exceed 3 solar masses in order to be considered as a
black hole; we know that a characteristic "double-horn" shape will be introduced into the
spectrum of a black hole due to a gravitational redshift; we know that the X-ray emission
from a black hole should be highly variable in time. But are any of these methods a foolproof
way of identifying black holes to the exclusion of any other type of celestial object? The
answer is not yet clear. Several objects, starting with Cygnus X-1, have been tentatively
identified as black holes via such methods, and while some scientists believe these absolutely
are black holes, other scientists still wait for confirming evidence.
Suppose that you are in a spaceship safely orbiting a 10 solar mass black hole. You decide to
get closer to the event horizon, which has a radius of about 30 km. At a radial distance of
around 15,000 km you already know that something strange is going on. Inside your
spaceship, with your head toward the stars and your feet toward the black hole, you begin to
feel a slight pull downward on your feet and upward on your head. This is the onset of the
amazing tidal forces surrounding a black hole. These are the same forces as the Earth exerts
on you when you stand on its surface. However, the difference between the force exerted by
the Earth on your head versus your feet because one is further away from the center than the
other is miniscule...less than one part in a million. For the superstrong gravitational field of
black hole, however, it is not so trivial. Even at a large distance from the event horizon such
as 15,000 km, the difference between the gravitational pull on your head and your feet is
about 1/8 of the Earth's gravitational pull. Uncomfortable, but not painful, you continue to
spiral in slowly to a distance of about 8,000 km. At this point, you experience a stretch of 4
times the Earth's gravity. Things are not fun anymore, but continue on toward 3,000 km.
There is now a 15g stretching force. You cannot stand it. You give up and move your
spaceship back to a comfortable distance. Whew!
Do all black holes have such strong tidal forces at such large distances from the event
horizon? No, and this may sound odd, but the larger the mass of the black hole, the weaker
the tidal forces will be! This seemingly paradoxical situation has a simple origin: the tidal
force is proportional to the hole's mass divided by the cube of its circumference. So as the
mass grows and the horizon radius grows proportionally, the near-horizon tidal force actually
6 12
decreases. For a black hole weighing a million solar masses, the tidal force is 10 billion times
weaker than what they are for a 10 solar mass black hole.
Thus, it is most instructive, phenomenologically, to fall into a very massive black hole like
the kind you would find in the center of an active galaxy. We will try to understand what
happens both from the perspective of the one who is falling (which we will call the Explorer)
and from the perspective of those watching from a safe distance away (which we will call the
Watchers). The journey will appear to be completely different from those two perspectives,
thanks to the amazing behavior of space and time in the clutches of a black hole's
gravitational pull.
As our Explorer begins to fall toward the black hole, for the first few minutes of the journey
nothing will appear out of the ordinary. Clocks on board our intrepid Explorer and on board
the safe-distanced Watchers are in unison. Space is not distorted and the light coming from
the Explorer is normal. As our Explorer approaches the event horizon, she begins to be
stretched out because gravity is pulling more strongly on her feet than on her head. Although
to our Explorer time is still running along in a normal fashion, the Watchers now see her
clock running slow. The strong gravity of the black hole is now distorting both space and
time. The Watchers also notice that the Explorer now appears to look redder than normal, as
light loses energy in its struggle with gravity to pull away from the hole. Just above the event
horizon, the elongated Explorer is almost invisible. The light has become extremely red and
dim as it loses most of its energy in its fight with gravity. Amazingly, the Watchers never see
the Explorer fall into the black hole. Because time runs slower and slower near the hole., she
never appears to cross the event horizon, but seems to hover just above it for infinite time.
The experience, however, is quite different for the Explorer, who feels herself being pulled
faster and faster into the black hole. As she crosses the event horizon, the black void is
suddenly replaced by an unimaginable array of views. We do not know what she may see
inside the black hole and, unfortunately, she can never communicate her discoveries back to
the Watchers. Within a few seconds, she is swept into the singularity.
13
7
heavens "light up" with wavelengths too short or too long for the human eye to see, and most
objects can only be fully understood by combining observations of behavior and appearance
in different regions of the EM spectrum.
The value of the EM radiation we receive from the Universe can be realized by considering
the following: Temperatures in the Universe today range from 1010 Kelvin to 2.7 Kelvin (in
the cores of stars going supernova and in intergalactic space, respectively). Densities range
over 45 orders of magnitude between the centers of neutron stars to the virtual emptiness of
intergalactic space. Magnetic field strengths can range from the 1013 Gauss fields around
neutron stars to the 1 Gauss fields of planets such as Earth to the 10-7 Gauss fields of
intergalactic space. It is not possible to reproduce these enormous ranges in a laboratory on
Earth and study the results of controlled experiments; we must use the Universe as our
laboratory in order to see how matter and energy behave in these extreme conditions.
Understanding this behavior is central to our ability to take our current models and
extrapolate them successfully into "what will become of our Universe?"
As we develop better observing technologies and techniques, we can ask and answer
fundamental questions, such as:
What happens to pressure, to temperature, and to the states of matter in the intense gravity
near a black hole? Black holes give us access to conditions that exist no where else in the
Universe and future X-ray missions will be able to probe very close to the event horizon of a
black hole. An emission line in the gravitational field of a black hole has a characteristic,
8
14
identifiable shape; it is redshifted (gravitational redshift) with a peculiar double peak. Current
instruments do not have enough collecting area to gather enough information on the short
timescales required by the changing emission from a supermassive black hole. On timescales
of an hour, we need to get enough photons for a good observation with enough resolution to
be able to observe the characteristic shape of the line in order to be an effective probe.
o How does matter flow in an accretion disk around a black hole? Less powerful, but closer,
active galaxies will allow us to probe the outer portions of the accretion disks. Recent Very
Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) observations have enabled us to measure the mass of
the central black hole with unprecedented accuracy. Extending this technique to more distant
and smaller galaxies, requiring a full-scale space-based VLBI capability, is the next step to
fully understand how gas in the outer part of the disk is fed inward to the black hole.
What causes jets? Numerous observations show that cosmic jets are a frequent natural
consequence of accretion disks. These collimated beams shoot out perpendicular to the
accretion disk around the compact object. First discovered by radio astronomers, they are
now regularly seen at optical, X-ray, and gamma-ray wavelengths as well. Understanding
how these jets are formed and what role they play in the accretion process is a major
unsolved question. In particular, we need to determine if they are launched and collimated by
magnetic stresses or if the pressure of the intense radiation fields (or some other
phenomenon) is responsible. The jets accelerate electrons up to nearly the speed of light,
producing gamma-rays which can be used as a probe of the jet environment. In addition,
from high resolution X-ray spectra, we can estimate the velocity distribution of high energy
electron populations and deduce magnetic field strengths.
15 9
IV. Activities and Problems Related ti Black Holes
Model a Black Hole
This demonstration allows for a visual depiction of the effect of a large mass on the fabric of
spacetime. In particular, what effect a black hole does or does not have on the other stars
around it and how that effect depends on the mass of the black hole. Remember that Newton
saw objects with increasing mass as having an increasing escape velocity; Einstein saw them
as making deeper "dents" in the fabric of spacetime!
Black Hole
E
4- _vent
4
Horizon
A black hole makes such a deep "dent" that it forms a bottomless well. The sides of the well
are so steep that even light cannot escape once it has fallen deeper into the well than the
event horizon depth.
Materials:
* Large latex balloon cut open and pulled flat, or sheet of latex
* Round bowl, roughly 4" in diameter
* Tape
* Package of small round beads (such as you might find in the cake decorating section of
a grocery store)
* 1" solid ball bearing (the eraser end of a pencil can be used as a replacement)
10 16
Procedure:
1. Tape the sheet of latex (this represents space-time) tightly across the top of some round
object, such as a bowl or even a coffee cup. The sheet should not be so tight that it will tear if
stretched further, but should be taut enough that there are not any wrinkles!
Note: This is much easier to do with the help of a partner!
2. Scatter a few beads on the sheet of latex (this represents matter that is near the black hole).
Make sure they are spread out to all parts of the sheet.
3. Gently place the ball bearing onto the sheet of latex (this represents the black hole). Try
not to let it bounce! If you don't have a ball bearing, gently push down on the center of the
sheet with the eraser end of a pencil.
4. Explain what happened to the matter when the black hole was put into place. Why did this
occur?
5. What would happen if the ball bearing was heavier (or if you push harder on the pencil)?
What physical analogy to the black hole may be made?
Materials:
Blow up the balloon so that it has a diameter of about 5 inches. Tie the end so it remains
inflated. Cover the outside of the balloon with tin foil so that it stays on the balloon. Be
generous with the tin foil and cover the balloon thoroughly. It works best if you use long
sheets and wrap around twice, rather than using several short sheets. Use tape if necessary.
We will consider this to be our star, with the balloon representing the "core" and the tin foil
representing the "outer layer material". Weigh the star on the scale and record this (and all
future) measurement in a data table. Now squeeze your star such that the balloon bursts
inside the tin foil. (Think of this as the simulation of the enormous mass of the star collapsing
inward toward the core.) Now carefully crumple the tin foil into a loosely compacted ball.
Weigh it again. Measure its diameter. Now crush it into a smaller ball. Weigh it and measure
11
17
its diameter. Crush it into as small a ball as you can with your hands. Weigh it and measure
its diameter.
What do you notice from your measurements about the weight of the crumpled ball as the
size of the ball changes? What about changes in the density of the ball, where density equals
3
mass divided by volume (for a sphere, the volume is equal to 4/3 TC r )? How small would
you have to make the ball of tin foil for it to achieve the average density of the Sun (1.4
3
g/cm )? What about the density of a neutron star (1037 g/cm3)? How small would you have
to make the ball for it to become a black hole?
Hint: Use the equation for the Schwarzschild radius! G = 6.67x10-11 m3/kg-sec2 and
8
c=3x10 rn/sec.
Based on an idea from Jeffrey F. Lockwood, Mercury Magazine, Volume 27, No. 2, p. 5,
1998.
Gravity, whether it is holding you to the Earth's surface or swallowing light in a black hole,
is the same force obeying the same laws at all places in the observable Universe.
We can measure it with this simple lab...
PURPOSE: To confirm the numerical value of g using two different experimental methods.
MATERIALS: Part A: tuning forks with frequencies between 256 384 Hz; adding
machine tape; carbon paper; masking tape; hooked 100 g or 200 g masses; ruler or meter
stick. Part B: ring stand or other device to support a pendulum; one meter of string per lab
station; a pendulum bob, or hooked mass; a stop watch.
12
18
PROCEDURE Part A
Measure a length of paper tape slightly greater than the distance from the lab bench to the
floor. Make several folds in the end of the paper tape, and secure it with masking tape. Poke
a hole through the reinforced end of the paper tape and insert the hook of the laboratory
mass. Tape a piece of masking tape or other smoother tape to the edge of the lab bench. Cut
a piece of carbon paper which is the same size as the width of the paper tape with the height
of the edge of the lab bench. Stick this piece of carbon paper onto the sticky side of another
piece of tape so the part of the carbon paper that makes it black is facing the edge of the lab
bench. Loosely tape the carbon paper over the other piece of tape. Thread your paper tape
between the carbon paper and the taped edge of the lab bench. Hold the paper tape so that
the mass is hanging freely just below the edge of the lab bench. Strike the tuning fork on a
rubber mallet or the heel of your hand. Touch the edge of the vibrating tuning fork to the
tape that has the carbon paper on it and release the paper tape so that the hooked mass falls to
the floor. The tuning fork must stay in contact with the carbon paper during the entire fall.
The vibrating tuning fork should make a series of dots on the paper tape. These dots should
be increasingly farther from each other. It may take several tries to acquire a suitable tape.
For a good analysis, the tape needs to have at least 50 dots in a straight line. Results are
better with 60 dots, because the first few dots cannot be used, nor can dots that are
equidistant be used.
After a suitable tape has been obtained, students should label with an A one of the first dots
that is clearly formed near the beginning of the tape. Count 10 spaces between the dots and
mark the end of the tenth space with a B. Continue marking every tenth dot with a letter until
the end of the tape is reached or the dots become equidistant. With a ruler or meter stick
measure the distances AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AG, etc. Record these measurements in a data
table with the frequency of the tuning fork you used.
ANALYSIS
From your tape you can see that the mass falls further during each time interval. When you
subtract each of the distances, AB, BC, CD, ... from the previous distance, you find that the
increase in distance fallen is a constant. That is, each difference BC AB = CD BC = DE
2.
CD = gt This quantity is the increase in the distance fallen in each successive 10 dot
interval and is an acceleration.
From your data table make a table of calculated values of AB, BC, CD, DE, etc. In the next
column of your table of calculated values, place values of BC AB, CD BC, and so on.
These values should be reasonably constant. WHY? Average these values. This represents
the constant increase in distance during each time interval. To find the time, divide 10 by the
frequency of the tuning fork. Each blank space between dots represents one vibration of the
tuning fork, and you counted 10 spaces or 10 vibrations between letters.
13
19
To calculate g divide the average distance by the time squared. If you used cm your answer
2.
should be 980 cm/s Calculate your percent error. It should be less than 10%. You might
want to repeat the experiment if your percent error is greater than 12%.
List some sources of error in this experiment. What errors would be introduced by using a
tuning fork whose vibrations are slower than about 100 Hz? higher than about 400 Hz?
PROCEDURE Part B
The best pendulum to use is one whose bob is a metal sphere hung by a fine thread.
However, acceptable results can be obtained with a hooked laboratory mass or a washer and
any kind of string or thread.
Obtain about one meter of string and a pendulum bob. Attach the string to a suitable stand (a
ring stand, for example) and then attach the string to the pendulum bob. The pendulum
should be able to swing freely without hitting anything. Measure the length, L, of the
pendulum from its point of attachment to the middle of the bob. Set the pendulum swinging
with small swings (not more than 10 degrees from the vertical.) Time at
least 20 complete round trips. Repeat the timing of 20 complete swings until you are
confident that you have a reproducible result. By timing many round trips instead of just one
you make the error in starting and stopping the stopwatch a smaller fraction of the total time
being measured.
ANALYSIS
Divide the total time by the number of complete swings to find the time T of one swing. This
time is called the period of the pendulum. Using this equation for the period of a pendulum,
T = 2 'IL (L/g)1/2, calculate the value for g. If you measured L in cm, your value should be
2.
980 cm/s Calculate your percent error, it should be about 1%.
If you believe it was your measurement of length and you think you might be off by as much
as 0.5 cm, change your value of L by 0.5 cm and recalculate the value of g. Has g changed
enough to account for your error? (If g went up and your value of g was already too high,
then you should have altered your measured value of L in the opposite direction. Try again!)
If your possible error in measuring is not enough to explain your difference in g (your %
error), try changing your total time by a few tenths of a second a possible error in timing.
Then you must recalculate T and g.
14 4U
If neither of these attempts work (nor both taken together in the appropriate direction) then
you almost certainly have made an error in arithmetic or in reading your measuring
instruments. In this case you should repeat the experiment. Your value for g should not
differ from the accepted value more than one unit in the third digit.
QUESTIONS
4. Which experiment gave you the lowest percent error? Explain fully.
EXTENSION
Isaac Newton made a number of contributions to our understanding of gravity and the
parameters upon which it is dependent. Consider the table of information below about the
Sun and planets in our solar system. Then answer the questions which follow.
1.....16,11,1,,11.4.111.I. NAL
Object Mass (kg) to gravity (ruj
Sun 1.991 x 103° 293.0
21 15
1. Based on the data, what generalization seems most appropriate?
4. In what way would your weight vary, if at all, if you were to find yourself on each of the
bodies in the table? Explain your answer.
5. From which body would the least energy be required to launch a projectile into space?
Explain your answer.
This Extension activity is based on one found in the book Physics Principles and Problems
by P. Zitzeitz, et al.
16 4f)2
Testing Einstein 101
In 1915, Albert Einstein published an article in which he outlined his general theory of
relativity. Amongst its many predictions, or predicted consequences, was that light should be
deflected by a gravitational field. This idea, certainly radical at the time, seemed impossible
to detect. However, scientists at the Royal Astronomical Society of London soon proposed an
experiment that they believed would test Einstein's prediction. The experiment would be
performed on March 29, 1919 at two separate locations: in northern Brazil and on an island
off the West Coast of Africa. On that day, at those sites, a total eclipse of the Sun would be
observed. The drawing below shows the position of the star as seen during the eclipse and the
actual position of the star as had been established six months earlier. Study the drawing
(exaggerated for clarity) and the answer the following questions.
Actual position
Observed of star
position of star
Sun in total
eclipse
This activity is based on one found in Physics Principles and Problems by P. Zitzeitz, et al.
The relationship of the Schwarzschild radius to the black hole mass is simple:
2
R = 2GM/c
This can be easily understood by looking at the equation for the escape velocity from any
spherical body such as a planet or star, namely, v = (2GM/R)1/2, where M and R are the mass
and radius of spherical object. For a black hole, the escape velocity is equal to c, the speed of
light.
1. What would be the radius of a black hole with the mass of the planet Jupiter?
2. How would the period of the Earth's revolution change if the Sun suddenly collapsed into
a black hole? Note that this can never happen!
3. Suppose the Earth were collapsed to the size of a golf ball...becoming a small black hole.
What would be the revolution period of the Moon, at a distance of 381,500 km? of a
spacecraft that had been hovering 300 m above a point on the surface of the Earth before its
collapse? of a fly orbiting at 0.5 cm?
There are many popular myths concerning black holes, many of them perpetuated by
Hollywood. Television and movies have portrayed them as time-traveling tunnels to another
dimension, cosmic vacuum cleaners, and so on. Here is your chance to show what you
know...or think you know! Decide if each of the following statements is either true or false.
Explain how you came to your conclusions.
00 r
2:4a Ti
18
1. Black holes move around the Universe sucking up everything in sight.
2. Black holes will eventually suck in all the matter in the Universe.
Inevitable Mathematics
Scientists believe that if an object reaches a critical radius near a black hole, the object will
inevitably be drawn into the singularity. In mathematics, a similar situation can occur. Some
mathematical expressions and operations will result in a numerical 'black hole' no matter
where you start!
A. Follow the below procedure starting with a positive integer. We show you the results for
the beginning values of 5 and 7.
Why does this procedure always give the answer 4? Let us examine the steps.
Go through the procedure again with the starting value of "B".
Notice that the final result is 4, regardless of the initial value. That is, all beginning numbers
fall into the 'black hole' 4.
Now it is your turn. Can you create a numerical 'black hole' whose value is always 10?
19
25
B. Examine the procedure below.
2
Continue this process 12 +0 = 1
What finally
happens? 12 = 1
In this example, the beginning number falls into the numerical 'black hole' 1. Repeat the same
steps with a starting value of 97. What number results?
Does starting with 81 yield the same type of numerical 'black hole' as starting with 97? Let
us investigate:
81 82 +12 or 65, which becomes 62 + 52 or 61. Following this through, you'll see the
following pattern emerge:
81-> 65-> 61-> 37 -> 58-> 89 145-> 42-> 20 4 -> 16-> 37-> 58...
Notice that this sequence has begun to repeat and, in fact, falls into a cyclic numerical 'black
hole'. The sequence eventually becomes periodic.
C. Now try 204. Does this create a new numerical 'black hole'? Justify your answer.
D. Can you describe without computation what happens if you start the procedure with 420?
In theory, any object can become a black hole as long as it can get small enough! For
example, a person weighing 70 kg can become a black hole... if that person had the same
mass, but was much, much smaller than the size of a hydrogen atom!
Recall the relationship of the Schwarzschild radius to the mass of the black hole:
R = 2GM/c2
20 26
Let's use that equation to prove how small a person weighing 70 kg would have to be to
become a black hole:
1. What would be the radius of the event horizon of a black hole with the mass of the planet
Jupiter? how about Earth?
2. How large in mass would an object have to be in order to become a black hole with an
event horizon the size of a basketball (consider the diameter of the ball to be 35 cm)?
V. Answers
Model a Black Hole
The heavy object representing the black hole will distort the latex surface (representing
spacetime) and cause the small objects on the surface to be pulled in toward it... but not if
you are too far away. A heavier ball bearing, however, would affect beads further out in the
latex
sheet...just as a more massive black hole creates a larger distortion in spacetime, thus
affecting objects further away.
Extension:
1. Even though there are exceptions, the data tend to support the generalization that
acceleration due to gravity varies directly with the mass of the object. This would be
2.
expected from this rearrangement of Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation: g = GM/r
2. The exceptions are that Saturn and Neptune are in reverse order and so are Earth and
Uranus.
3. Since acceleration due to gravity is measured at the surface of an object and since gravity
increases exponentially as the distance between the surface of an object and its center
decreases, an object of lesser mass but smaller radius may possesses a greater acceleration
due to gravity than an object of greater mass and greater radius. When a table of planetary
radii is consulted, it is found that the radius of Neptune in less than half that
21
27
of Saturn and the radius of Earth is about 1/4 that of Uranus. Based on the equation given in
2, it is reasonable to conclude that the radii of these objects account for what at first glance
appear to be exceptions to the rule.
4. Your weight would change depending on the value for the acceleration due to gravity.
Weight is a measure of the force that varies directly with the acceleration due to gravity, or
simply F = mg. Thus, the larger the value of g, the greater your weight!
5. Since Pluto possesses the lowest acceleration due to gravity, thus the lowest force of
attraction to its surface, less energy would be required to overcome that force than would be
the case on any of the other objects.
2. If the star was visible in the sky during the day in March, six months earlier it was visible
in the night sky. Since the position of stars relative to Earth remains essentially constant,
determining the position of the star during the night (six months earlier) provided the
scientists with valid data about the star's actual position.
3. Since the observed position of the star was more distant from the Sun's disc than its actual
position, the scientists could conclude that light from the star was deflected toward the Sun
by its gravitational field. Thus, the experiment supported Einstein's theory.
3. The lunar orbit would take the same as it does now, - 27.3 days. The orbit of a spacecraft
that had been hovering just over the surface of the Earth would be the same as the current
rotation period of Earth, 24 hours. The fly would be inside of the event horizon...so we have
no idea what is happening to it!
22 28
How Much Do You Know?
A black hole is not a cosmic vacuum cleaner! A black hole has an "event horizon" which is
the region from inside of which you can't escape. If an object crosses the event horizon, it
will invariably hit the singularity. As long as the object stays safely outside of the horizon, it
will not necessarily get sucked in. Far outside of the horizon, the gravitational field of a black
hole is no different from the field surrounding any other object of the same mass. A black
hole is not better than any other object at "sucking in" distant objects.
Consider this: if our Sun were suddenly replaced with a black hole of the same mass, the only
thing that would change would be the Earth's temperature. The gravity we feel here on Earth
from the "black hole Sun" would not change.
2. Black holes will eventually suck in all the matter in the Universe.
Not true. First, to be sucked into a black hole, you have to be near the event horizon. Far
outside the event horizon, stars and.planets and people are affected just as if the mass in the
singularity was the mass of a burning star occupying the space of the event horizon. You see,
as far as the gravitational pull on an object well outside the event horizon goes, it is only the
amount of mass that is important, not how it is arranged.
Furthermore, it has been shown theoretically by Stephen Hawking that when virtual particles
(undetectable quantum particles that carry gravity and light) enter the event horizon and get
sucked into the singularity, they use up more energy than they have and so contribute
negative energy (remember that this is a quantum process and not obvious to the minds of us
mere humans) to the black hole. As a result, the mass of the singularity decreases and the
black hole can eventually "evaporate" in this way.
What causes the creation of these virtual particles? Fluctuations of the electromagnetic and
gravitational fields, especially prevalent near superstrong gravity sources, can create pairs of
virtual particles (given this name because we can not detect them in any way as they exist in
this form). Left to themselves, the pairs (a particle and its antiparticle) will move apart
slightly, then back together to annihilate each other on a very short timescale. However, if the
pair is created right along the event horizon, as they move slightly apart one can become
trapped inside the event horizon and one left outside it. They cannot then get back together to
annihilate. This has profound consequences:
1. Without its virtual partner, the escaping particle becomes a real particle and appears to us
on Earth (watching it happen) to be radiation coming "from the black hole". This is called
Hawking Radiation, and actually radiates from just outside the event horizon.
23
29
2. The particle with negative energy that was captured by the black hole will reduce the mass
of the singularity. If this happens enough for a long enough period of time, the black hole
will simply "evaporate" away.
Inevitable Mathematics
A. Take any number, Multiply it by 12: Add 40 to the result: Divide by 4: Subtract three
times the original number.
B. 1
C. With this procedure, this number will fall into a cyclic 'black hole' like 81.
D. Again, by following through with this procedure, this number will fall into a cyclic 'black
hole' like 81.
-11 3 2 8
G=6.67X10 m /kg-sec and c =3X10 m/sec
27
1. Using the Schwarzschild equation, we input the mass of Jupiter (1.9X10 kg) to see that
the radius of a Jupiter-mass black hole would occur at 2.82 meters.
We can also input the mass of Earth (5.97X1024 kg) to see that the radius of an Earth-mass
black hole would occur at 8.8 X 10-3 meters.
2
2. We would solve for M in the Schwarzschild equation to find M = c Ri2G.
If the radius of the basketball is 17.5 cm, the necessary mass to be 1.18 X 1026 kg. This is
approximately the mass of Neptune.
The Visible/UV image is from a Hubble Space Telescope observation of NGC 4261. The
image is courtesy of H. Ford and L. Ferrarese (Johns Hopkins), W. Jaffe (Leiden), and
NASA.
The radio image is of the nearby active galaxy Cygnus A. This image has been used with
permission from National Radio Astronomy Observatory /AUI.
24
30
The X-ray spectrum is from an ASCA observation of the active galaxy MCG-6-30-15. This
figure is from a paper entitled "Gravitationally Redshifted Emission Implying an Accretion
Disk and Massive Black Hole in the Active Galaxy MCG:-6-30-15 by Y. Tanaka et al.,
published in Nature, Volume 375, p. 659, 1995.
The X-ray image is from a Roentgen Satellite observation of the active galaxy NGC 1275 at
the center of the Perseus cluster of galaxies. The contour lines show the radio structure as
given by VLA observations. The image is courtesy of the Max Planck Institute.
The X-ray light curve is from a Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer observation of the micro-quasar
GRS 1915+105. The figure is from a paper entitled "A Unified Model for the Spectral
Variability in GRS 1915+105" by T. Belloni et al ., published in the Astrophysical Journal,
Volume 488, p. L109, 1997.
The scales provided on the diagram are typical values for an active galaxy.
VII. Glossary
Accretion Disk a swirling, heated accumulation of dust and gas in orbit around a compact
object such as a neutron star or black hole. Matter from this environment continues to fall
onto the disk and eventually spirals into the central object.
Cygnus X-1 a stellar black hole candidate. Cygnus X-1 was the first X-ray source found in
the constellation Cygnus.
Electromagnetic Spectrum the range of different light or radiation. Oscillating electric and
magnetic fields transfer radiant energy through space. Wavelength, energy, frequency, or
temperature can classify these electromagnetic waves.
Escape Velocity the velocity needed to escape the gravitational influence of a massive
body. It depends on the distance you are away from the center of the body and the mass of
the body. The closer you are, the harder it is to escape.
25
311
Event Horizon a boundary that defines the point-of-no-return for a black hole. Once this
boundary is crossed, no escape or communication with the outside world is possible.
Neutron Star the final stage of existence for stars born three to seven times more massive
than our Sun. Neutron stars are produced by supernova explosions. In these objects, material
is so highly compressed that all the protons, electrons, and neutrons are piled together,
breaking down the normal structure of an atom.
Nuclear Fusion an energy-generating process that occurs where the pressure and the
temperature are so enormous that lighter atoms such as hydrogen can fuse together to make
heavier atoms such as helium, releasing enormous amounts of energy. Nuclear fusion occurs
in the cores of stars; the energy eventually emerges from the surface and we see it as
sunlight/starlight.
Singularity a geometric point with no dimensions where the laws of physics break down. It
is a theoretical point of zero volume and infinite density.
Spacetime the combination of the three spatial dimensions (length, width, and height) with
time. The four together form the 4-dimensional nature of our Universe. The effects of gravity
can be regarded as a result of the curving of spacetime due to the presence of massive
objects.
Speed of Light the ultimate speed limit in the Universe: 300,000 kilometers/second.
Stellar Evolution Theory the theory of how stars evolve from birth to death. Stars are born
in huge gas and dust clouds and end as a white dwarf, neutron star, or black hole, depending
on initial mass.
Supernova a dramatic explosion marking the death of stars much more massive than our
Sun. Neutron stars or stellar black holes are the objects left behind.
White Dwarf an end-stage of life for stars with masses similar to our Sun's. A white dwarf
is a stellar cinder about the size of the Earth. White dwarfs no longer have nuclear reactions
taking place in their cores, but are still quite hot from their past activity. After billions of
years, they will cool completely and be thought of as a black dwarf.
26
32
VIII. Related Resources
Websites
Besides the information you will find about black holes in the Imagine the Universe! Web
site, try these other sites:
http://jean-luc.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Movies/
This Web site has virtual reality and informational movies on black holes. This site is
associated with NCSA, and is for students in middle school and above.
http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/xte/learning center/
More about the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer and some related education activities
http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/rosat/rhp geninfo.html
More about the Roentgen Satellite
http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/asca/ahp geninfo.html
More about the ASCA Satellite
http://cossc.gsfc.nasa.gov/cossc/PR.html
More about the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory
http://oposite.stsci.edu/pubinfo/education/amazing-space/
More about the Hubble Space Telescope at their education site Amazing Space
http://www.nrao.edu/
More about the National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Books
Couper, Heather and Henbest, Nigel, Black Holes, Dorling Kindersley Publ., 1996. A
colorful introduction to the many strange behaviors and appearances of black holes. Intended
for middle school to high school levels.
33 27
Gaustad, John & Zeilik, Michael, Astronomy: The Cosmic Perspective second edition,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1990. This text was designed for an introductory astronomy course
for upper high school or undergraduate students who want a comprehensive view and
understanding of modern astronomy, including black holes (see Chapters 20 & 21).
Novikov, Igor, Black Holes and the Universe, Canto Edition, Cambridge University Press,
1995. A well-written, non-technical introduction to black holes and their phenomena. An
interested high school student can easily enjoy this book.
Mitton, Jacqueline & Simon, The Young Oxford Book of Astronomy, Oxford University
Press, Inc., 1995. This book explains many concepts in astronomy from the Solar System,
galaxies, and the Universe, including black holes. Intended for the middle or high school
student.
Seward, Frederick D. and Charles, Philip A., Exploring the X-ray Universe, Cambridge
University Press, 1995. Explains X-ray astronomy and astrophysics. Intended for the
undergraduate science major, or above.
Voyage Through the Universe: Stars, Time-Life Books. This volume is one of a series that
examines the Universe in all its aspects. General information for the upper high school
student (and above), related to black holes, will be found in the 'Neutron Stars and Black
Holes' chapter.
Magazine Articles
Berstein, Jeremy, "The Reluctant Father of Black Holes", Scientific American, June 1996,
vol. 274, no. 6. Discusses the details of how Einstein's equations of gravity are the foundation
of the modern view of black holes. Intended for the high school student who is interested in
science, and above.
Charles, Philip A. & Wagner, R. Mark, "Black Holes in Binary Stars: Weighing the
Evidence", Sky and Telescope, May 1996, vol. 91, no. 5. From this article, one can
understand that by making X-ray observations, astronomers are sometimes able to detect
black holes (especially when coupled to a normal star in a binary system). Intended for the
high school student interested in science, or above.
34
28
Schulkin, Bonnie, "Does a Monster Lurk Closebyr, Astronomy, September 1997, vol. 25,
no. 9. Describes the possibility of a massive black hole existing at the heart of our Milky
Way Galaxy. Intended for the high school student interested in science, or above.
Videos
Mysteries of Deep Space, "Exploding Stars and Black Holes", PBS Home Video,
Turner Home Entertainment (60 minutes). This is a well-told story that explains the life
cycle of massive stars that will eventually die as black holes. Intended for the high-school
student and above.
"Search For Black Holes", New River Media (60 minutes). This is a video that contains
interviews with all of the 'who's who' in black holes research. Some of the animations are
quite clever. Intended for the high-school student and above.
Stephen Hawking's Universe Series, "Black Holes and Beyond" (60 minutes). The
animations in this video are very attractive. Intended for the high-school student and above.
35
29
Produced by
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics
36
U.S. Department of Education
Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)
National Library of Education (NLE)
ERIC
Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)
NOTICE
REPRODUCTION BASIS
EFF-089 (9/97)