Graduate School of Development Studies

Screening War:
Gender, Sexuality and Nationhood in Cinematic
Representation of Liberation War in Bangladesh

A Research Paper presented by:

Afroza Bulbul
(Bangladesh)

in partial fulfilment of the requirements for obtaining the degree of

MASTERS OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

Specialization:
[Women, Gender and Development]
(WGD)

Members of the examining committee:

Dr Dubravka Zarkov [Supervisor]
Dr Amrita Chhachhi [Reader]

The Hague, The Netherlands

November, 2011
Disclaimer:
This document represents part of the author’s study programme while at the
Institute of Social Studies. The views stated therein are those of the author and
not necessarily those of the Institute.
Research papers are not made available for circulation outside of the Institute.

Inquiries:

Postal address: Institute of Social Studies

P.O. Box 29776
2502 LT The Hague
The Netherlands

Location: Kortenaerkade 12
2518 AX The Hague
The Netherlands

Telephone: +31 70 426 0460

Fax: +31 70 426 0799

ii
Contents

Chapter 1: Introduction 1
1.1 Statement of the Research Problem 1
1.2 Contextual Background and Justification 1
1.2a Political History of Bangladesh 1
1.2b Liberation War of Bangladesh 2
1.2c Islamization and Political Turmoil 2
1.2d The Dilemma of Gendered Contribution to the Liberation
War 4
1.2e Cinema History of Bangladesh and War Movies 4
1.3 Research Objective and Questions 5
1.4 Methodology and Data Collection 6
1.5 Limitations of the Research 8

Chapter 2: Drawing Theoretical Connections and Prior Empirical

Research 9
2.1 Gender and Nation 9
2.2 Gendered Nature of War 10
2.3 Cultural Representation 11
2.3a War Films as a Genre 12
2.3b Representation of Gender in Film, Particularly in War Film 12
2.4 Analytical Tools 14
2.4a Feminist Approach 14
2.4b Narrative Analysis 14
2.4c Intersectionality 15

Chapter 3: Representation of Nation, National Identity and War 16

3.1 Gendering the Nation 16
3.2 Construction of National Identity- Intersections with Religion 17
3.3 Representation of War 18
3.3a Victim vs. Perpetrators, Self-vs. Other 19
3.3b Framing of War - Trends and Changes Within the
Narratives 19
3.4 Concluding Thoughts 22

iii
Chapter 4: Femininity and Female Sexuality 23
4.1 Three Faces of Womanhood - Service Provider, Source of Inspiration,
Emotional 23
4.2 Imaging Rape 25
4.2a A Distinct Category 25
4.2b Female ‘Chastity’, ‘Purity’ and Three Unavoidable ‘Solutions’ 26
4.2c Masculine Gaze and Visual Pleasure 28
4.4 Concluding Thoughts 30

Chapter 5: Dominance of Masculinity and the Politics of Visibility

and Invisibility 32
5.1 Masculine Men – Eligible to be Freedom Fighter 32
5.2 Sexual Victimhood of Men – Under the Carpet? 34
5.3 Adolescent Youth - Hand in Hand with Masculine Men 36
5.4 Concluding Thoughts 37

Chapter 6: Conclusion 39

iv
List of Figures

Image 1: Islamic Kazi with a background of ‘modern’ Bangladesh 18

Image 2: Comparison between President Ziaur Rahman (left) and filmic
army officer (right) 21
Image 3: stereotypical images of raped woman 26
Image 4: The rapist and the raped woman 29
Image 5: Raped women at the shooting target with anonymous persons
(left image), close up long shot from leg to breast (right image) 30
Image 6: Macho masculine freedom fighter 32
Image 7: Sexual assault on men during 1971 35

v
Acknowledgements:
The completion of this research would not have been possible without the
support of many individuals. I would like to express my gratitude to all of
them–
To my supervisor Dr. Dubravka Zarkov for her superb guidance, support
and advice.
To my reader Dr. Amrita Chhachhi for her valuable directions during
seminars.
To my discussants Irmasanthi Danadharta, Shyamika Jayasundara and
Shuchi Karim for their constructive feedbacks.
To Rajib Nandy for kindly providing me with DVD sources.
To my fellow colleagues at the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh, specially
to Dr. Gitiara Nasreen, Dr. Fahmidul Haq, Khorsed Alom and Kajalie
Shehreen Islam for their support throughout my study period in the Hague.
To my fellow Bangladeshi students in the ISS for their hearty company
and guidance.
To my WGD classmates for the moral support they have given me in
difficult times.
To the Dutch Government for providing me with financial sponsorship
through the Nuffic Fellowship Programme.
To my beloved husband Md. Masum Ahmed and my sweetest daughter
Progya Paromita Babui – who have suffered so much to support me in the
completion of this study programme and have grown tired of waiting since
September 2010.

vi
List of Acronyms
BAL Bangladesh Awami League
BNP Bangladesh Nationalist Party
JI Jamaat-e-Islami
GHADANIC Ghahtok Dalal Nirmul Committee

vii
Abstract
This research examines representation strategies of Liberation war of
Bangladesh and also discusses how the issues of gender within that war
narrative has been represented in Bangladeshi movies using ten movies from
mainstream and independent films. Taking Stuart Hall’s theories of
representation as broader theoretical background, the study analyses how the
war has stereotypically been represented within the dichotomous
representation of self-vs. other and how the national identity was represented
according to the identity of dominant community of Bangladesh overlooking
the existences of ‘other’ groups.
This paper also found that the films portrayed the nation in ‘sacred’ and
‘pure’ image of motherhood and the representation of femininity, masculinity
and sexuality has sprung from that feminized image of nationhood. Hence,
representation of gender and sexuality was predominantly prejudiced in films
around social construction of heterosexuality, manhood and womanhood, and
around the exclusivity of female sexuality.
The findings suggest that although representation strategy have been
shifting due to national and global political changes, films in both mainstream
and independent production have consistently used dominant notions of
gender and heteronormativity.

Relevance to Development Studies

Cinema, being a powerful part of mass media, can be a mobilizing tool by
educating, informing and facilitating decision making process; therefore it is
inextricably linked to development. It can work as a pressure group for the
government to safeguard citizens’ rights like economic, political and human
rights. In Bangladesh, after 40 years of independence, the present generation
had to mostly rely on mass media to learn about history of their country.
Important part of this was cinematic representation of Liberation War of
Bangladesh. Moreover, when the trial of war criminals is the burning issue of
the country today, no doubt representation of Liberation War becomes one of
the political tools for the government, citizen and for the accused.
Representation of gender is directly related to the issue of human rights that
can instigate a campaign against existing gender discrimination in the society.
This study will pay critical attention to the gendered and sexualized
representations of Liberation War which now in Bangladesh received
significant concern of the policy makers due to both political and feminist
movement.
Keywords
Cinematic Representation, Liberation War, Bangladesh, Gender, Sexuality

viii
Chapter 1: Introduction

1.1 Statement of the Research Problem

This research explores how Liberation War of Bangladesh and the issues of
gender and sexuality within the war narratives have been represented in films
of Bangladesh. Taking Stuart Hall’s theories of representation as a larger
theoretical background, this study focuses on the strategies of representing the
war, the nation, gender and sexuality in the cinematography of Liberation War.

1.2 Contextual Background and Justification

Recent controversy around the representation of the Liberation War of
Bangladesh in film “Meherjaan” has inspired me to work on the issue. Main
allegation against the film was that it undermines suffering of Bangladeshi
women raped by Pakistani forces during the war, by telling a love story
between a Pakistani soldier and a Bangladeshi woman. According to the
director “the film tried to capture different narrative of the Liberation War, but
as it does not follow the dominant theme of the struggle” it is facing
controversy (Hossain, 2011). Hence, my quest is how has the Liberation War
of Bangladesh been represented in the Bangladeshi cinema since independence.
In this section I will discuss briefly the cinema history of Bangladesh.
Nevertheless, since the cinema history is closely related with the national
history (Raju, 2000) it is necessary to look at political history of Bangladesh
when looking at its history of film. Therefore, I start with the political history
of Bangladesh with particular focus on Liberation War of 1971. Afterwards I
discuss the representation of nationalist struggle in movies, particularly in war
movies, from a feminist point of view and also how this representation process
takes place in the cinema of Bangladesh. This in turn creates the paradigmatic
rationale of my study.

1.2a Political History of Bangladesh

Bangladesh, earlier named Bengal province, was the part of India under British
rule (1757-1947). In 1947, independence came in the form of partition between
‘India’ and ‘Pakistan’ incorporating Bengal with Pakistan, renaming it East-
Pakistan. The region had experienced major political upheavals as part of
Pakistan, and after achieving independence. Chronologically these are:
Language Movement (1952), Liberation War against Pakistan (1971), military
coup following assassination of President Sheikh Mujibur Rahman (1975),
other coups that brought military rule (during 1980s) and mass movement
(1990) against military backed autocracy that brought changes to the state
power.

1
1.2b Liberation War of Bangladesh
It is said that, Islam was the sole principle of statehood in East and West
Pakistan, with differences in all other respects. Two nations emerged within
one state and over the period various administrative, military, linguistic, civil
and financial controls by West Pakistan toward the East Pakistan led to a
Liberation War in 1971. After nine months bloody war, Bangladesh become
liberated and established as the Peoples’ Republic of Bangladesh. The war of
1971 is generally referred to by a name: the Liberation War of Bangladesh
(Saikia, 2004).
During the nine months of the war, Pakistani Army with the assistance of
local Bengali collaborators (i.e. Razakars, Al-bodor, Al-shams, and Shanti Bahini1)
killed 300,000 (Mookherjee, 2006) men and women from all walks of life, and
raped about 200,000 women and girls (Ibid). After the independence, the then
government declared all raped women of 1971 as Birangona (War Heroines).
This was an attempt to reduce social ostracism of rape toward the women and
enable their smooth social re-absorption (Mookherjee, 2006).
However, political turmoil did not disappear. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was
assassinated in a military coup in August, 1975, and two other military coups
followed (3rd November and 7th November of 1975) with killing of political
leaders who were involved with Mujibur’s Parliament. After that, there were 15
years of military rule (1975-1990) followed by a major change in the ideology
of the state power.

1.2c Islamization and Political Turmoil

It is argued that a secular notion of Bengali culture had served as the keystone
for the rise of Bengali nationalist discourses that challenged Pakistani-Muslim
identity and ultimately made possible the independence of Bangladesh (Raju,
2011). Following this spirit, after independence, the new ‘modern’ first
government (1972-1975) introduced “Bengali nationalism” and “secularism” as
principles of the Constitution. Next government of Ziaur Rahman (1976 - ’81)
introduced “Bangladeshi Nationalism” and declared that "absolute trust and faith
in the Almighty Allah shall be the basis of all action” instead of “secularism” in the
preamble of Constitution. General Ershad’s government (1982- 1990) changed
the Constitution again and introduced "Islam" as state religion and took the
nation from secular modernist to "Islamic nationalism" (Samad, 1998). This
transformation was not limited to the constitutional change but there was a
systematic effort to incorporate “Islam as an integral part of socio-cultural life”
(Raju, 2011) like making Islamiat2 as a compulsory course in school education,
establishing more madrassa etc. What is common in all these efforts of changing
national identity and promoting new culture is a quest for homogenization –

1 These are the names of organizations that were formed by local Bengalis during

Liberation War to assist Pakistan Army against independence of Bangladesh.

2 Text on Islam

2
propelled toward the majority community. The Bengali identity was respectable
and suitable for use when Bengalis were being oppressed in the name of
religion by West Pakistan. But once the hegemony of West Pakistan was
removed with the creation of Bangladesh, the Muslim identity came to the
fore. However, different regimes introduced different identity but never
accommodated minorities of Bangladesh3
The process of Islamization was not conducted only through
constitutional change. Another major step was the effort of integrating Jamaat-
e-Islami (JI) - the prominent group involved in war crimes collaborating with
Pakistan - into the state power. Immediately after independence, Mujibur’s
government banned the JI. Later on the Islamic Academy was revived and
upgraded to Foundation, unconditional pardon was announced for the war
criminals, and diplomatic ties with Pakistan were developed (Samad, 1998).
Still, secularism was Constitutional principles.
Consequently, the Islamic communalist groups like the JI, re-emerged in
the politics of Bangladesh during the late 1970s and 1980s and since then are
propagates the “establishment of an Islamic State” (Raju, 2011). During the
’80s and ’90s, under the rule of Ershad, a form of state supported religious
communalism gained momentum and JI emerged as a powerful political party
in the context.
In 1990, Bangladesh faced a mass upheaval that had overthrown the
autocratic military regime and brought an atmosphere of democracy with
regular national elections. In that democratic environment and with the spirit
of `90s mass upheaval, memories of 1970 have emerged that brought up issues
of trial of collaborators like Gholam Azum, chief of JI. In 1992 Gono Adalot
(People’s Tribunal) - a massively mobilized movement led by ‘left-liberate
cultural elites’ - was held under the organizational support named Ghahtok
Dalal Nirmul Committee (committee to abolish Pakistani agent - GHADANIC)
(Mookherjee, 2006).
The spirit of the `90s protests or the efforts of GHADANIC were not
sustained as the two major political parties, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party
(BNP) and Bangladesh Awami League (BAL), have found it politically
expedient to create space for political Islam in their own campaign rhetoric and
to form short- and long-term alliances with Islamist political parties (Hossain,
2010). However, since December 2008 election, government led by the BAL
started to bring Bengali collaborators to trials, and as part of its declared
election manifesto the latest Constitutional Amendment of 2011 restored
secularism (Daily Star, 2011). Contradictorily, this Amendment keeps Islam as
state religion and allowed religion based politics.

3 Bangladesh
is home of 45 different ethnic communities and several other religious
communities including Hindu, Buddhist and Christian (Mohsin, 2004).

3
1.2d The Dilemma of Gendered Contribution to the Liberation
War
There is no dilemma encompassing men’s role in the Liberation War. The only
question mark is about women’s contribution. From the very beginning of the
independence, women were identified as the victim of war, as raped women
who have lost their izzat4 – who contributed their ‘honour’ for the sake of the
nation. Looking from the patriarchal-mainstream point of view, it will be
obvious that the raped women of 1971 are not forgotten; they appear in
national history textbooks, popular literature and even in the museums, looking
from the feminist point of view, the overall ambiguity around the
representation of women in 1971 is apparent (Hossain, 2009). By losing the
‘most valuable resource (i.e. izzat).’ the raped women become ‘fallen women’ in
the eye of the nation and only option for them in the national history was
silence, utmost effort to hide the ‘dark side’ of independence – a crucial
interrelationships between memory and secrecy (Mookherjee, 2006).
According to the declaration, ‘War Heroines’ (Birangonas) are only those
who were raped in the war. But how about those heroines who fought with
arms in the battlefield along with the male combatants directly against the
Pakistan Army? It is important to mention that, although there was no specific
women’s agenda in the nationalist movement in 1971, women took up arms
and joined the underground resistance. Taramon Bibi was awarded the title of
Bir Protik5 in 1973 for her courageous contribution with direct fighting in
armed conflict. After independence there was no trace of her whereabouts. In
1995 a researcher found out where she lived and consequently the women’s
organization brought her into the light (Daily Star, 2006). As Taramon Bibi was
honoured by the then government, it was possible at least to look for her.
However, Geeta Kar (Ibid), Bithika Biswas, Shishir Kona, Shahana Parvin
(Murshid, 2008), and other unidentified female freedom fighters fought in the
war. Yet they are not honoured, even not recognized in the mainstream
discourses of war. After forty years of independence, in 2010, a three member
parliamentary sub-committee has been formed to collect information on the
role played by women in Bangladesh’s Liberation War (Daily Star, 2010).

1.2e Cinema History of Bangladesh and War Movies

For long it was established by notable historians of Bangladesh that cinema of
Bangladesh began with the making of The Face and The Mask in 1956, directed-
produced-written and acted by Abdul Jabbar Khan. However, Raju (2000)
argued that “as the film historians were operating from within a nation
building, they do not seem to be able to evaluate other possibilities for

4
According to dictionary ‘izzat’ refers to honour, chastity, and dignity. Thus ‘loss of izzat’ means to
lose one’s prestige, honour, chastity. In the culture of Bangladesh, especially in public rhetoric, the
word is frequently used to indicate the raped women.
5
Bir Protik (symbol of bravery or idol of courage) is the fourth highest gallantry award in
Bangladesh. Freedom fighters were adorned with four different insignia in recognition of their
extraordinary and highest sacrifice in the Liberation War of Bangladesh.

4
beginning the history of cinema in Bangladesh and so earlier decades are seen
only as a pre-historic sense”. Hiralal Sen from the East Bengal started first
filming actuality footage in Calcutta and Dhaka during 1898-1901 (Ibid). While
this earlier history of Bengali and Bangladeshi film is important, I will not
address it here because of word limitations6.
The film industry of Bangladesh - Bangladesh Film Development
Corporation (BFDC) was established in 1957. Since the establishment of the
film studio, the theme and story line of Bangla cinema has taken several shifts.
The major genre of films made at the end of 1950s and `60s was social realism
like Akash ar Mati (The Sky and The Soil), Abanchita (Unwanted, 1969). In the
`7os the genre was social, particularly rural social life such as Lathial (The Stick
Fighter, 1975), Sareng Bou (The Wife of boatswain, 1979);in the `80s costume
fantasy like Nagin (Serpent-Vergin, 1980), Beder Meya Jotsna ( The Gypsy Girl
Jotsna, 1989). In the `90s there were two genres – teenage romance like Chadni
(1991) and violence such as Ammajan (The Mother, 1999). The 2000 was
wholly dominated by violent films with pornographic insertions (Haq, 2008).
There has also been a genre of war movies throughout the years –
sometimes with the spirit of the Liberation War and sometime with nationalist
spirit. The country’s first ‘political’ film was Jibon Theke Neya (Glimpses of Life
1970) by Zahir Raihan. It faced multiple opposition from Pakistan (Raju,
2000). After independence, during 1972-1974 with active encouragement from
the government, film industry took the Liberation War as principle theme.
Some of the notable war films of that time were, Ora Agaro Jon (Those 11
Freedom Fighters, 1972), Orunodoer Ognisakshi (In The Flames of Sunrise,
1972), Alor Michil (The Procession, 1974) etc.

1.3 Research Objective and Questions

The overall objective of this research is to understand the ways in which the
Liberation War of Bangladesh has been represented in movies of Bangladesh
and how gender, sexuality and nation have been employed in that
representation.
In correspondence with this objective, the main research question is
hence: How are gender, sexuality and nationhood used in the cinematic
representations of the Liberation War in Bangladesh?
The sub-questions are:

What aspects of femininities and masculinities, and female and male
sexualities dominate the representations? Especially, how are those
employed in the representations of sexual violence against women and
men?

6 See for details Rajadhyaksha (1994), Quader (1993), Zaki (1997), Razu (2000) and

Kabir (1979).

5

How the nation and national identity are represented within the war
discourses, and how are they gendered and sexualized?

Do the representation strategies vary between Mainstream movies and
Independent movies?

1.4 Methodology and Data Collection

This is a qualitative and explorative research based on secondary data. I
selected ten movies based on purposive sampling method, for specific reason-
differences in the narrative plot, popularity, award winning category, year of
release and availability. Most importantly, I selected movies based on the
existing categorization of films in Bangladesh - mainstream film and
independent films.
Mainstream films have been identified as commercial films that have been
released widely all over the country in the movie theatres. Primary goal of these
movies is to maximize profits. So they are easily accessible, predictably linear,
star centred and tending to tie up a happy ending. They are mainly part of
popular culture, although at present the common idea is that mainstream films
are throwing popular culture in a crisis, they have no sense of history and are
very poor in representing reality (Nasreen & Haq, 2008). Independent films are
those that are mainly produced outside the main film studios. Primarily these
films were non-commercial, mainly funded by the directors themselves with
support of friend and family members. Independent film makers appear to
have “at least some social responsibility. They stood against the wave of
money-making illusion and presented some remarkable films on Liberation
War” (Quader, 1993:22). These films try to provide their audiences with
alternative thoughts like raise question to the existing power structure of state,
malpractices of society and so on. The target audience of these films are
international film festivals and advanced and literate audiences.

Films I analysed based on above mentioned criterion are

Film Director (Year)

Ora Agaro Jon Chasi Nazrul Islam (1972)
(Those 11 Freedom Fighters)
Mainstream Film

Megher Onek Rong (The Rainbow) Harunur Rashid (1976)

Kalmilata Shahidul Huq Khan (1981)
Aguner Poroshmoni Humayun Ahmed (1994)
(Touch of Fire)
Joy Jatra (Journey to Victory) Taukir Ahmed (2004)
Guerilla Nasiruddin Yousuff (2011)
Agami (Time Ahead) Morshedul Islam (1984)
Nadir Nam Modhumoti Tanvir Mokammel (1995)
Independent

(The River Named Modhumoti)

Etihaas Konya Shameem Akhter (1999)
(Daughter of History)
Film

Matir Moyna (The Clay Bird) Tareque Masud (2002)

Ora Agaro Jon is the first Liberation War movie of Bangladesh. Megher Onek
Rong is the movie praised by several film critiques due to variations in its
narrative plot. The film was withdrawn from all cinema theatres just one day
after it was released, for yet unknown official reasons (Quader, 1993). Kalmilata

6
is a film of 1981 when Bangladesh was under military rule for the second time.
The film was made before 1981 at the reign of President Ziaur Rahman who
was the first military ruler of Bangladesh, and it was released on 23rd Dec. 1981
– after the assassination of president Zia – amidst the military rule of president
Ershad. Aguner Poroshmoni is a national award winning movie directed by
Humayun Ahmed – one of the popular novelists of the country. Joy Jatra is
produced by a private television channel – “Channel I”. Film production by
television channels is a recent trend in Bangladesh. The film was firstly released
on TV and then in movie theatre. Joy Jatra also achieved national cinema award
in Best Director category. Guerrilla is the latest war movie of Bangladesh based
on Syed Shamsul Huque’s novel and the director’s personal war-time
experience as a freedom fighter. The movie was released at 13 movie theatres
across the country at a time.
Three movies on Liberation War were released in 2011- Meherjaan,
Guerrilla and Amar Bondhu Rashed (My Friend Rashed). As stated in the first
chapter, Meherjaan raised huge controversy all over the country.7 Guerrilla and
Amar Bondhu Rashed received both the audience’s and film critique’s
compliment. I planned to analyse at least two of these films including
Meherjaan, but due to the unavailability of Meherjaan and Amar Bondhu Rashed I
analysed Guerilla.
Agami, Nadir Nam Modhumoti, Etihaas Konya and Matir Moyna are four
independent movies.. Although there is some controversy around the first
independent movie of Bangladesh, “most of the film buffs consider Agami as
the starting point of independent film making. Because of its critical and
commercial success, independent filmmaking arrives as an ‘alternative
movement’” (Haq, 2007). Agami got the Silver Peacock in the best director
category in Delhi International Film Festival in 1985.
Tanvir Mokammel is another pioneer of independent films of Bangladesh.
That is why I’ve selected Nadir Nam Modhumoti, in addition to its narrative plot.
Etihaas Konya is directed by a female director Shameem Akhter. It tries to raise
some significant questions around the war. Matir Moyna won the International
Critic’s prize at the 2002 Cannes Film Festival and became Bangladesh’s first
film to compete for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. Due
to some religious overtones, Bangladesh Film Censor Board banned the film,
but with the judgement of Appeal Board, the decision of the government was
reversed.
I have placed detailed synopsis of these films in Aappendices and analysed
them according to the analytical tools described in chapter two under section
2.4.

7 Meherjaan is a film I could not see due to its withdrawal from the movie theatres.
Nevertheless, I have included a short discussion about the film based on the debate
published in daily newspapers in the following chapter, under “Representation of
gender in films, particularly in war films”.

7
1.5 Limitations of the Research
As already stated, my analysis will focus on representational strategies
employing gender, sexuality, and nationhood, but not other social relations of
power. Furthermore, the proposed research analyses only ten films. This is not
enough to make a generalization about the representations of Liberation War
movies, but offers insights into some trends. In addition, from my childhood, I
have watched films of the Liberation War: in every anniversary national
television and all other private TV channels broadcast these movies repeatedly.
Thus, I am fairy familiar with the genre and can use my experience in selection
and reflections.
Language created a limitation while describing the dialogues in the films.
Every language has its own emotion, rhythm, resource that cannot be
translated exactly to another language. In Bangladesh, using English subtitle in
film is a very recent addition, yet not all films use subtitle. Thus, translating is
challenging, specifically keeping in mind the word limits of the dissertation.

Due to personal restrictions, such as the care of my nineteen month old

baby, it was not possible for me to go to Bangladesh to collect data. Therefore,
I have collected DVDs of the selected films in the Netherlands.

8
Chapter 2:
Drawing Theoretical Connections and Prior
Empirical Research

This chapter presents my theoretical perspectives and analytical tools I use to

analyse cinematic representations. I use three main analytical concepts: war,
gender and the politics of representation, though of course there are many
overlaps in terms of sub-groupings and practices. This research can therefore
be broken down into two primary areas; the theories related to gender, nation
and war and the theories related to the media/cinematic representation.

2.1 Gender and Nation

Researchers (Yuval-Davis and Anthias 1989, Walby, 2000, Enloe, 1990) view
nations and national projects as gendered – “whether already stabilised within a
nation-state, or energetic political movements aspiring for a state of their own,
they hold ideals as to the proper place of women and men in society” (Walby,
2000: 523). The relationship between nation and the state is also seen as
gendered, as men and women share differently the goals and responsibilities
for a national project.
Nira Yuval-Davis and Floya Anthias (1989) provided ground breaking
theory exploring the link between nationalism and gender. Drawing from
different geographical and political experiences, they sum up various ways in
which women can and do participate in ethnic and national processes and in
relation to the state practices. Women are: (a) biological reproducers of
members of ethnic collectivities; (b) reproducers of the boundaries of the
ethnic/national groups, (c) participants in the ideological reproduction of the
collectivity and transmitters of its culture; (d) signifiers of ethnic/national
differences; (e) participants in national, economic, political and military
struggles (Yuval-Davis, 1997). Those women’s roles actually reflect the
masculinist definition of femininity and of woman’s ‘proper’ place in the
nation.
Classical theorists (i.e. Anderson 1983, Gellner 1983) marginalised the
issue of gender in nation formation but praised women’s role as mother.
Ideology of ‘woman as mother’ or symbolic representation of woman’s body as
the national territory expose the position of women in national projects.
Theorists also defined nation as natural expansion of family and kinship
relations based on ‘natural’ sexual divisions of labour, in which men protect the
women and children (Yuval-Davis, 1997). So what is generally expected from
women for the nation is aligned with what is expected from them in the family:
caring for others, bearing children, educating etc. Women are subordinated in
nationalist movements and politics, being symbolic ‘mother in the fatherland’
(Koonz, in Nagel, 2001) and expected to safeguard the honour of the nation
and ‘their’ men.
Cynthia Enloe argues, “nationalism has typically sprung from masculinized
memory, masculinized humiliation and masculinized hope” (1990: 45).
9
Motherland as woman to be protected by brave male warriors is a very
common metaphor. It is therefore perceived that the culture and ideology of
hegemonic masculinity go hand in hand with the culture and ideology of
hegemonic nationalism (Nagel, 2001).
In South Asian perspective, it is argued that the theme of ‘women and
sacrifice for the nation’ is woven into the dominant nationalist thought
(Choudhuri, 2000). Lata Mani (1998) analysed the discourse on women, culture
and Indian society by critically examining the representation of sati8 and argued
“women are neither the ‘subject’ nor the ‘object’ but grounded for discourse of
tradition and modernity” (in Mankekar, 1999:107). Sati were viewed as
‘emblematic of tradition’, or ‘pathetic or heroic victims’. Even the abolition
procedure of sati was not on the ground of ethics; it was revived with the logic
of “enforcing the truest principle of Hindu religion” (Mani, 1998:15).
Therefore, it can be said that religion has an important place in the
discourse of national identity politics particularly in the South Asian context.
Religious nationalism also used gendered rhetoric as a political strategy.
Agarwal (1995) explained how during 1992/93 Hindu-Muslim riots in India
Hindu men were rebuked for not being ‘manly enough’ to protect the Hindu
women and so to protect their national honour. Moreover, rape of ‘other’
religious group was justified using this language of vindication and dishonour.
Regarding women’s participation in Nationalist movement Kabeer (1991)
argued, although women participated in the armed struggles for Bangladesh,
they relied on the good intentions of the nationalist government to represent
their interests and remedy social injustices. But they were accorded a place in
state discourse focusing on their domestic role. Researchers9 also noticed how
the patriarchal Bangladesh excluded women and ethnic and religious minorities
from the nationalist discourse.

2.2 Gendered Nature of War

Joshua Goldstein (2001) argues that it is difficult to ‘do war’ without ‘doing
gender’ and vice versa. He showed, gender norms during war actually reflect
the prevailing gender norms of the society. Constructions of manhood and
womanhood have been used as the basis for the naturalization of the gender
division of labour in wars. Therefore, society tries to develop all men as
warrior. To help overcome soldiers’ reluctance to fight, cultures develop
gender roles that equate ‘manhood’ with toughness under fire and women are
given feminine war support roles (Ibid).
The sexual violence perpetrated in war is gendered from this point of view
that all types of sexual attack uphold a metaphorical feminization. It

8 Sati refers to Hindu widow woman who burns herself to death on her husband’s
pyre either by choice or by force.
9 For instance Mookherjee (2006, 2008, 2011), Mohsin (1984, 2004),Kabeer (1991),

Samad (1998), Shafie & Kilby (2009), Hossain (2009), Rahman (2009).

10
symbolically genders the victor as male and the defeated as female (Goldstein,
2001).
There has been mounting evidence suggesting that women and girls
experience war differently than men and boys, with women usually facing more
insecurity, disadvantage and marginalization (Denov, 2006). In terms of
women’s participation in war, it can be said, in almost every war, women either
supported or participated directly with arms. They involved themselves in
cadres and military units. Despite their bravery, “it is often the case that
feminist nationalists are themselves once again under the thumb of
institutionalized patriarchy once national independence is won” (Nagel,
2001:353).
It is also argued that women and girls are the common victims of wartime
sexual crime mainly because of their gender, and their bodies are used as
figurative and literal sites of combat (Denov, 2006). It can also be said that this
is because of the patriarchal society. Where gender inequalities already exist,
war actually worsens the existing situation.
Becoming a war refugee is also a gendered experience (Yuval-Davis,
1997). For selective killing in war, most of the time men are selected, taken
away, and then disappear. On the other side, as they are often absent, attached
to fighting or hiding to avoid being arrested, women, old men and children are
left alive.

2.3 Cultural Representation

Stuart Hall describes representation as an essential part of the process by which
meaning is produced and exchanged between members of a culture. It does
involve the use of language, of signs and images which stand for or reference
objects, people and events in the material world (Hall, 1997). However, the
process is not simple or straight forward as they can also reference imaginary
things and fantasy world or abstract ideas which are not part of the material
world. In fact, representation is the act of re-presenting the object or incidents
that connect meaning and language to culture. Meaning are produced at several
different sites and circulated through several different processes or practices.
Hence, the meaning is not in the object or person or thing nor is it in the
world; it is the human being “who fix the meaning so firmly that after a while it
comes to seem natural and inevitable” (Ibid: 21). Moreover, the relationship
between signs, the concept and the objects is not fixed, but rather entirely
arbitrary, intervened by the social, cultural and linguistic convention that
change over time, thus never can be finally fixed.
For Hall, ideology and power fixes the meanings. The interpretation of an
idea, people or event is constituted through the medium by which it is
distributed i.e. image, word, in addition to social and cultural input. The
communication of these ideologies is always “linked with power and those
groups that have control over what is represented in the media” (Hall, 2006).
Thus, those in control of the media have control of the meaning that is
represented in the media. Using the example of race, Hall argues that media
construct for us a definition of what race is, what meaning the imagery carries
and what the ‘problem race’ is understood to be. Therefore, understanding of

11
race in the society is through the representation of the society received through
media. The media is biased in its representation of different groups of people.
Media controls what content we are allowed to invite into our reality and into
our world of shared cultural and social perception (Hall, 1996).
2.3a War Films as a Genre
‘Genre’ is a French word meaning ‘type’ or ‘kind’ defined as “a system of
codes, conventions and visual styles, which enables an audience to determine
rapidly and with some complexity the kind of narrative they are viewing”
(Turner, 1999:99). It also includes specific system of expectation and
hypothesis which spectators bring with them to the cinema and which interact
with film during the course of the viewing process (Ibid).
War film has always been a popular genre all over the world. Generally it
contain a certain formula, suggested by Sobchak as a narrative where “a group
of men, individuals thrown together from disparate backgrounds … must be
welded together to become a well-oiled fighting machine” (2003:111). Along
with the general genre restrictions, war films usually also portray battles of
good versus evil and right versus wrong. War films inspires patriotic fervour
and a sense of satisfaction in a job well done, reflecting the seemingly
undeniable victory for the film producing country (Hill-Parks, 2004). Litchy
and Carroll (2008) describe the genre of Hollywood war movies as easy to
identify through convention including a plot beginning with training and
following a specific unit into battle, troops depicted as heroes; the enemy
fanatical.
2.3b Representation of Gender in Film, Particularly in War Film
Feminists like Smelik (1999) observed film as a cultural practice representing
myths about women and femininity, as well as about men and masculinity.
Clair Johnston (1991) first mentioned how women are mythically represented
in movies. Drawing on Roland Barthes' notion of 'myth', she argues women as
a structure or convention refers to the ideological meaning that 'woman' is for
men and they are represented as ‘not –men’ (in Smelik, 1999).
Laura Mulvey in her ground-breaking work 'Visual Pleasure and Narrative
Cinema' (1975) explained that classical cinema works on the axis of activity and
passivity where the binary opposition is gender. Through the concept of
scopophilia (desire to see), she argues cinema produce the male characters as
‘active’ and ‘powerful’; female characters as passive and powerless. Dramatic
action of cinema is organized around the male characters and women become
the object of desire for the male character(s). Cinema has prepared the
machinery suitable for male desire (in Smelik, 1999).
Film scholars (Basinger 1995; Gauntlett 2008; Haskell, 1987) also noticed
that stereotypes fuel gender representation in films. Female characters are very
much passive and let men are the active characters. Nasreen and Haq (2008)
researched that the female characters of contemporary mainstream Bangladeshi
movies do actually nothing except being the lover girl and therefore a singing
partner of hero. Even heroines in profession are not projected in professional
life. Contrary to that, men are the heroes in all the films and everything in the
plot revolved around them and their actions. Masculinity in culture revolved

12
around body size of the man, the more muscular the man the more masculine
he is (Leham & Lurh, 2003).
Karen Gabriel (2005), in her in-depth research on sexual economies on
mainstream Bombay films shows that the construction of sexual economies
controls the representation of Bombay cinema and it occurs within normative
understandings of gender and sexuality where women’s sexual choice
interrupts the organization of the sexual economy. She further reveals, cinema
as a tool of propaganda whether by government or the industry or by the
spectators – they control the representation process.
War has always been presented in media from a patriarchal point of view.
Several studies show that media representation supports the theory that
popular culture still upholds a masculinist paradigm of war. For instance Zotto
(2002) reveals that traditionalism, commercialism and nationalism inform
mainstream media, contributing to a gendered coverage of war. Women are
seen as passive victims rather than activists and combatants. Even, while with
the span of time, other forms of media like journalism and posters started to
identify women’s different roles, cinematic representations of women focus on
dominant imagery and overlook alternative contemporary images (Reynaud,
1999).
In Bangladesh, although Liberation War figured prominently as a theme in
a number of films, there is very little critical research from feminist
perspectives, except some newspaper article where it is acknowledged that in
Bangladeshi movies, the subject of ’71 is often compromised by two major
pitfalls: firstly, the tendency to fall back on time worn conventions and
sentimental clichés, and secondly, an inability or unwillingness to maintain a
dispassionate distance from their subject matter (Masud, 2004).
Nayanika Mookherjee (2002), who did her doctoral thesis on the
Liberation War of Bangladesh, finds media’s representation strategy gendered.
She argues the horrors of rape and raped women in media are predominantly a
victim who is muted by the trauma of the war and going through a consequent
suffering – physical, social, emotional. Mookherjee (2002) further argues,
although the violence on women in war is recognized, what constitutes the
history of Birangona is still unaddressed.
Saikia (2004) also explored that in media, raped women of 1971 are almost
absent, except for news on the rehabilitation programmes, otherwise
portraying the subject as ‘unthinkable’, ‘a matter of shame’.
The recent movie Meherjaan is an example of what happens to a movie if it
does not follow the dominant narrative of war or social construction of gender.
This film - directed by a female director Rubaiyat Hossain - portrays a wartime
story of love of a local girl (Meher) with enemy soldier and agentive role of
raped women (Neela) who seeks revenge by joining the war. Moreover, there
were issues like visibility of women’s sexual desire, homosexuality, freedom
fighters’ tiredness about fighting and indication of the wider structural context
within which violence against women is normalized in non-war situation. Such

13
portrayal introduced huge debate10 in Bangladesh and the movie was taken out
of cinema theatre within 15 days of its release.
If the film is considered a counter narrative of war, it’s reception is
understandable given that “where art is expected to function as reportage,
anything outside a dominant narrative of unblemished heroism is seen as insult
and hostility” (Mohaiemen, 2011). Hence, the patriarchal Bangladeshi society
could not allow different tones that are not woven in the hegemonic discourse
about their nationalist movement and also about femininity and female
sexuality. It is ‘normal’- if a woman is raped she ‘should hide it’, not exercise
her agency. A woman ‘should suppress her sexual desire’. ‘Proper Bengali men’
should feel proud to fight for the country; and most of all, ‘Pakistani soldiers
should always be portrayed as villainous’.

2.4 Analytical Tools

For the purpose of the current study I utilized a combination of feminist
approach, narrative analysis approach and the Intersectionality perspective.
Combination of these three approaches allows for an analysis and
understanding of the films’ representation process in relation to society’s
existing ideologies.
2.4a Feminist Approach
Feminists argue that communication is gendered and by using feminist
approach as a tool of analysis it is possible to identify sex related biases and the
social implications of those biases (Deese, 2010).
A key concept in feminist approach is ‘gender’. The post structuralist
understanding of gender is continually shifting and interacting in contradictory
structural and cultural managements, enacted and articulated in daily life
(Zoonen, 1994). Based on post structural explanation, relevant question arising
about media discourse are: how is gender discourse constructed in the various
‘moments’ of mediated production? How is gender discourse encoded in
media texts; which meaning is available and from which discourses do they
draw, what are the related social practices, etc. Such conceptualization of
gender as a process and the social interaction and power relation embedded
into it were the guideline of my analysis.
2.4b Narrative Analysis
A narrative is defined as organized sequence of events into a whole so that the
significance of each event can be understood through its relation to that whole.
Therefore, key features of narratives are a) they are chronological (they are
representations of sequence of events), b) they are meaningful and c) they are
inherently social and produced for a specific audience (Elliott, 2005). Mass
media productions are not just an account or representation about events but a

10See
for the debates - Ferdous,Babu,Gayen & Priovashini (2011); Hossain (2011);
Mookherjee (2011); Waheed (2011); Chowdhury (2011).

14
construction of the events created through a narrative and stories within the
narrative using textual, audio, visual and other means.
Zarkov (2011) argues, there is usually more than one narrative in media
events, often supporting and building each other; sometimes dominant
narratives exclude or marginalize alternative accounts of events by silencing
them or ridiculing them. In most of the time there is one meta narrative of
events that provides the main framework for understanding the meanings of
events. She also points out that media narrative often present the world view
of special social, corporate, political positions of broadcasters or groups that
own, support them and at the same time it is also grounded in historical
traditions, myths and their reconstructions in popular ideologies and social
practices (e.g. in war related events; Zarkov, 2011). Therefore, this indicates
that narratives are represented through the cover of discourses and practices
that already exist in a society.
2.4c Intersectionality
Intersectionality addresses the most central, theoretical and normative concern
within feminist scholarship by acknowledging the differences among women
(Davis, 2008). It addresses the interaction between gender, race and other
categories of difference in individual lives, social practices, institutional
arrangements and cultural ideologies and the outcomes of these interactions in
terms of power (Ibid).
Leslie McCall (in Nash, 2008) has noticed three types of intersectional
methodological tools: ‘anticategorical complexity’ that deconstructs analytical
category, ‘intracategorical complexity’ that look for complexity of lived
experience within marginalized groups and ‘intercategorical complexity’ –used
to analyse inequality among social groups. I have used both intracategorical
and intercategorical complexity methodology while examining the cinematic
representations of war, through the intersectional lens of gender, sexuality and
nationhood. It is important to add here that other social relations of power,
such as religion, ethnicity and class are also significant for the dynamics of the
Liberation War, and certainly for its representation. However, I will not be
consistent in examining those intersections due to time and word limitations of
this research. For example, I will only look at religion in relation to
nationhood, but not gender and sexuality.
To understand the strategic meaning of representation in the larger
spectrum of the politics of media representation of gender, sexuality and
nationhood in war movies, along with the above dominant approaches, I will
also use categorization as an analytical tool, as given by Leudar, Marsland and
Nekvapil (2004). The authors explain categorization as a formal analysis of
visual and textual representations that gives meaning to the strategies media
employ to make sense of other people and their activities. It provides the views
that representation and actions are closely related – representations of events
provide moral accounts of past actions and prepare the ground for the future
actions (Ibid, 2004). Categorization is always situated in a concrete socio-
political context, in time and space and given a history to legitimize it.

15
Chapter 3: Representation of Nation, National
Identity and War

This chapter will focus on the representational strategy about the nation,
national identity and war. First two segments will analyse how the war movies
represented Bangladesh and its national identity and second segment deals with
representation of war.

3.1 Gendering the Nation

O my motherland, to thee I bow.
On you are goddess mother’s sari’s end.
You are mixed with my body; you are mingled with my breath and soul.
Your dark soft image is planted in my essence.
Oh mother, born in your lap, I will die on your breast
I play on you in my joy and sorrow.
You fed me by hand, bathed me in cool water.
You bear all, carry all, you are mother’s mother.
Above song by Rabindranath Tagore was used at the very starts of Ora
Agaro Jon. Through this song the country was addressed as mother and the
country’s activities toward its citizen were compared with the care of a mother
and maternal body for her children. This feminization of the nation through
the symbol of mother actually indicates the essentialist gender roles for women
within nationalist discourses.
Representation of the nation as mother is found similar in independent
films if we concentrate on the following conversation:
“Bachu – What does country mean? Is it paddy field, jute field, river?

Akhter- It is more than that…Mother and mother land is holier than heaven. Listen
carefully, as if a mother is crying. The country is now in deep sorrow”

(Film- Nodir Nam Modhumoti)

Here, the mournful image of mother as “crying” depicts pathos and pain
and encourage a patriotic feeling. Because the mother is attacked and raped,
she needs protection and urges her sons to remain vigilant, make supreme
sacrifices for her cause or for the protection of her honour.
Therefore, woman’s position in the nationalist discourse of Bangladesh is
restricted within women of certain categories – those who have the procreation
capacity. Those who are not part of this maternal model are not included. This
is reminiscent of Werbner’s theory of “political motherhood” (in Mookherjee,
2008) which is situated at the point that breaks down public/private
dichotomy. Werbner argues such feminization of citizenship responsibilities
portrayed women not as victims but rather as active agents concerned for
family and community. In return, the nation also demands citizenship
16
responsibilities from its ‘sons’ to protect and preserve women’s honour and
purity. This prescribed role of protector and preserver of honour actually
establishes hegemony of men over women.
Tagore’s song hailing the mother incorporates nature imagery in an
attempt to make a connection between several separate cultural and aesthetic
constructs, nature, space, earth and motherhood. Using this aesthetic notion of
nature, linking it with motherly image, was seen as an inevitable part of the
complex sentimentality of the nationalistic feeling of Bangladesh (Kaviraj,
2007). Thus nature has given both political and emotive meaning to invoke
nationalism. This is the ‘selfing of nature’ (Ibid) – giving meaning to abstract
image and place through the self. In this representation nature stands for the
symbol of beauty, purity and sacred entity while the aesthetics of ‘mother
Bengal’ retell the mother’s image as sacred, pure and beautiful as the nature.
The process of representation of gendered nation is evident in the war
discourse of Bangladesh. Although women became the ground upon which
nationalism flourish, their role has been authorized only within the domestic
paradigm: as mother, wife, sister, nurse. Moreover, being only in the role of
mother, their sexuality was denied and it was limited to the realms of
reproduction and child rearing. Respectability and chastity of mother subverted
the existence of raped women in that discourse. In this context, raped women
and those mothers who were impregnated unwillingly during war were
excluded from the nationalist discourse (will discuss further in chapter 4).

3.2 Construction of National Identity- Intersections with

Religion
National identity is not represented only as gendered but also in intersection
with religion. Since religion has been used in nation building process of
Bangladesh (discussed in chapter 1) through instituting religious ideals into the
state structure (Mohsin, 1984), independent film makers have promoted
‘national’ identity in opposition to the political endeavour of forming an
Islamic national identity.
Realising the importance of cinema in forming a secular and democratic
Bangladesh, independent film makers organized Independent Film Movement
in the mid ’80s with the notion to raise the spirit of Bengali nationalism
considering it as the only inspiration of Liberation War and to resist religious
communalism in the form of Islamism. They mainly focused on Islam as a
negative component of the society as a way to resist Islamic communalism.
As a consequence, Razakars (Pakistani agent) became one of the common
characters of independent movies, visualized as a representative of orthodox
Muslim or in the role of Moulobi (Muslim priest). They were typically
represented as wearing traditional Muslim dresses like pajama-panjabi, Islamic
cap and beard. This became a stereotypical character who, despite being
religious, was involved in atrocious activities like killing, slaughtering, raping,
snatching others’ assets, etc. (e.g. Agami; Nodir Nam Modhumoti).
It is true that Razakars of the ’71 were members of different Islamic
political parties. However, not all of them wore Islamic dress or were aged
persons as the films represented. Many of them used western dresses i.e. T-
17
shirts, trousers and were young like freedom fighters represented in the films.
Not all Moulobi were Razakar in ’71 (Haq, 2008). Hence, I argue, combining
Islamic mannerism with an absolutely negative war role has the motive to
propagate anti-Islamic ideology to its audience.
Moreover, despite of three different roots of the Bangladeshi community -
Bengaliness, Muslimness and folk religion (Haq, 2008) these film makers
wanted to accept only Bengaliness - the ethno linguistic identity. They
represented this identity within the framework of ‘modernity’ and
‘progressiveness’ portraying Muslimness as the ‘other’, as an ‘anti-modern
force’. The identity of ethnic minorities is also excluded from this ‘modern’
discourse. However, this is also an effort to propagate a homogenized national
identity through Bengaliness, locating Muslimness and other ethnicities outside
or against it.

Image 1: Islamic Kazi with a background of ‘modern’ Bangladesh

Source : Film – Matir Moyna (2002)

The framework of modernity has been represented from another

perspective in Matir Moyna (image 1) through the reflection of conflict between
Islamic and anti-Islamic characters, Kazi and Milon. Kazi is the representative of
old, orthodox Muslims who sends his son Anu to Madrassa for education.
Contrarily, Milon - young, liberal and progressive, influences the boy Anu with
his beliefs and practices. Anu does not like Madrassa’s culture, and during the
Liberation War he leaves it as a symbolical representation of his quest for a
modern way of life.
Therefore, to resist Islamic national identity, independent film makers, like
the state authorities, tend to ‘other’ Islam.

3.3 Representation of War

This part discusses how the selected films framed the war narratives and what
changes and shifts in representation process have been observed within those
narratives. First, I will define how the categories of ‘victim’ and ‘perpetrator’ in
the 1971 war have been represented, then what is the tendency of
representation in relation to the historic time lines and social, political context.

18
3.3a Victim vs. Perpetrators, Self-vs. Other
Representations of victims and perpetrators in the selected films followed
simplistic modes – West Pakistan as ‘enemy’ and ‘perpetrators’, Bengalis as
‘victim’. The West Pakistani soldiers were represented as killers of innocent
people including children and women, rapists, savages (Kalmilata), unjust -
depriving Bengalis of their legal rights (Ora Agaro Jon). Contrary to that,
Bengalis were visualised as kind, humane (Aguner Poroshmoni), respectable,
responsible (Ora Agaro Jon), and careful. Killing by the Bengali freedom fighters
was justified as a response to the aggressive attacks and injustice of the West
Pakistanis, thus, a way of taking revenge on the ‘janwar’ (animal) like enemy
(Kalmilata).
Clearly, the identity construction of West Pakistani soldiers and Bengali
freedom fighters followed a juxtaposition of binary logic between ‘self’ vis-à-
vis the ‘other’ where Bengalis are the ‘self’ and West Pakistanis are the ‘other’.
Representation of the West Pakistanis as ‘other’, with negative attributes, was
used to provide a moral ground for the Bengalis’ actions. Hence, the same
activities (shooting, killing) done by Bengalis were represented as rational,
deserved and justifiable. Recalling the category analysis of Leudar, Marsland
and Nekvapil (2004) it is very clear that this categorization relies on
oppositional context like brutal vs. kind, rapist vs. respectful to women, unjust
vs. just.
Compared to the mainstream movies, the focus of independent movies
was more on the enemy within the country than on the West Pakistan. It was
the Bengali collaborating forces who received maximum emphasis as enemies.
So, in independent movies, Bengali collaborating forces were represented as
the ‘other’ guilty of ‘opportunism’, ‘mercilessness’, ‘rape’, and ‘brutality’
(Agami; Nodir Nam Modhumoti ). The freedom fighters were constructed as the
‘self’ who possessed the opposite characteristics, just as in mainstream movies.
3.3b Framing of War - Trends and Changes Within the Narratives
Visualization of war in the mainstream movies mostly revived around the
specific incidents of 1971 like killing of innocent Bengalis, looting, capture of
property, abduction, rape of women etc. But how once cherished Pakistan
become an enemy is not very clearly depicted. Maybe this is because of “the
difficulties in narrating a historical event in popular cultural form” (Viswanath
& Malik, 2009). Yet, both the mainstream and independent movies have their
own point of view regarding the issue of war.
Generally, war movies follow a linear narrative of war like - there is an
enemy party who unjustly invade the territory or attacked the innocent people
and there is a native group who fights against the invasion and sacrifices their
lives for the sake of their ‘motherland’. At the end, the enemy party had to
surrender and the story finished with the theme of triumph of good over evil.
Mainstream movies of Bangladesh are also to some extent a reflection of such
linear narrative of war: West Pakistan is the enemy and freedom fighters are
the heroes. Nevertheless, West Pakistan’s presence in movies was not very
visible except the presence of soldiers participating in the war and in some
cases in Radio news, like Radio Pakistan, “Swadhin Bangla Betar Kendre’’ (Free
Bengal Wireless Station) or Voice of America. In some movies, the name of
19
West Pakistan was not even uttered. Instead of introducing the enemy clearly
they were addressed as ‘military’, ‘hanader’ (attacker) ‘dokholdar’ (occupier), or
‘janwar’ (animal). For instance, in Kalmilata the name of West Pakistan or
Pakistan was not mentioned in a single statement. The film used indirect
words: ‘they want to kill us’, ‘enemy is coming forward’, ‘torture by military is increasing
day by day’. Even in the issue of local collaborators there is a message of
forgiveness: “we should hate the crime not the criminals”. Moreover, Razakars
activities were not clearly portrayed in the film.
Clearly, mainstream movies do not have a historical or objective
documentary approach to war but represent personal statement of directors
and their own understanding of the event, coupled with dominant notions of
nationhood and patriotism. Yet, this particular strategy of representation
indicates a specific resemblance with the country’s changing status of political
ideology of the ’80s when the government was trying to improve relation with
Pakistan. Keeping Pakistan hidden in the war discourse and also hiding
Razakar’s brutal activities, is an attempt to create a positive socio-political
environment so that their actions do not seem to be ‘unusual’. Kalmilata was
released at the midst of changing political ideology of Bangladesh when the
party of JI, which is publicly termed as ‘party of Razakrs’, was started to be
patronized by the government. Hence the representation in this film is an
attempt to support government’s activities, to lessen Pakistan’s responsibility
and to act as a pro-government agent.
Moreover, this is the first film of Bangladesh that somehow upholds the
role of Bangladesh Army in Liberation War. Accordingly, this representation of
Army as leaders is obviously a new aspect of war movies of Bangladesh.
Earlier, and even after this film, heroism of civilians and middle class young
freedom fighters was dominant in representations. Bangladesh Army,
Bangladesh Police, and Bangladesh Rifles (BDR)11 were totally absent. New
visibility of the Army, it may be argued, carried the influence of the military
government and of President Major General Ziaur Rahman, who was the
commander of Sector 1 and later of Z Force during the war, and had the
intention to highlight Army’s role in achieving independence. The
photographic comparison (Image 2) between Zia and the commander of Army
in the film shows how one role had inspired the other.

11A para- military force of Bangladesh that also heroically participated in the war, now
renamed as Boarder Guard Force (BGD).

20
 Image 2: Comparison between President Ziaur Rahman (left) and filmic army officer
(right)

Source: Film – Kalmilata (1981)

Contrary to Kalmilata, Etihaas Konya tried to give an opposite message to its

audience. The film demanded trials of war criminals, apologies from Pakistan’s
government, and investigation about Pakistani citizen’s wartime role. Pakistani
female character was acted by Sara Zaker, a Bengali actress. The textual
analysis of these two films reveals quite different types of representation.
However, if we move from textual analysis to contextual analysis, we will find,
these two films were produced and released in different socio-political
contexts. Kalmilata was released in a military atmosphere of ’80s whereas
Etihaas Konya was released after the mass upheavals of ’90s – in a democratic
environment. Moreover, with the international recognition of rape as a war
crime, the issue of sexual violence in Liberation War re-emerged in the public
discourse (Mookherjee, 2003). Hence, directly or indirectly, these films were
influenced by the socio-political contexts of ’80s and ’90s.
Accordingly, Guerilla also highlighted directly war time role of Pakistan
army and Razakars, specifically JI’s role. I would like to argue that this
representation is also influenced by the present political context of Bangladesh
and have some motifs to influence the war crime trials of Bangladesh. The
ideology of director Nasiruddin Yousuff - a freedom fighter and one of the
members of GHADANIC- is clearly exposed in this film. The production and
distribution of Guerrilla is at the time when BAL started Trials of war criminals.
So far, the criminals who were arrested and brought to trial are all members of
JI Bangladesh (Khan, 2010). In Guerilla, Razakars were boldly represented as
members of JI. Their brutal activities were represented so vividly and so many
times that it obviously indicates the consequence of political context on the
film, and the hopes to have impact on the current political elites.
Therefore, with the case of films like Etihaas Konya and Guerrilla it is not
only the influence of social context that inspired the directors to look at the
issue from different standpoint, it is also a matter of the directors’ personal
background and interest.

21
 Representation of Razakars only through Islamic mannerism or in the
characters of Moulobi has changed in new millennium. the For instance, Joy Jatra
and Guerrilla has the characters of Razakars. Simultaneously, they have two
other characters: Taslim Sarder (Guerrilla) and Imam (Muslim priest, Joy Jatra)
who are just the opposite of ‘Razakar’. Joy Jatra’s Imam protested against the
atrocious attack of Pakistani military and he is the first martyr of the film. On
the contrary, Taslim Sarder, being a motivated Muslim, even with typical Muslim
attire was represented as protesting against misdeeds of Razakars, conscious
about women’s honour, supported freedom fighters, helped them to escape
from Pakistani attack and was eventually killed by the Razakars.
The changing ideology about the role of Moulobi or the intention to
represent Islam positively has a causal relation with 9/11. One of the effects of
9/11 was that the West started to look at Islam and Muslim as the ‘other’, as
the enemy, terrorist. So, while earlier some film makers wanted to be the part
of Western modernity by depicting Muslimness as the ‘other’, after 9/11, they
formed symbolic community with that ‘other’ Muslim, turning it into the ‘self’.
Furthermore, Haq (2008) argues, due to the changing global politics, audience
will also prefer to see Muslim characters in the film in a positive role, even with
the sentiment of Liberation War.

3.4 Concluding Thoughts

From the above discussion, a number of representational strategies can be
summarised. The first strategy is the metaphoric representation of the nation as
mother. The notion of ‘sacredness’ and ‘purity’ become an inevitable traits of
mother that relates to Butalia’s argument: “sacredness and purity is essential for
self-legitimizing the nation and the community” (1998:144). This iconography
has given the state a ‘logical ground’ to discuss the history of rape only in
collective form and also to aestheticize this brutal history in Bangladesh’s
nation building project.
Second, representation of national identity followed the dichotomous
representation between ‘self’ and ‘other’- Bengaliness as the ‘self’ and
Muslimness and other ethnicities as the ‘other’. This representation tends to
overlook the existence and rights of the ‘other’, promotes incorporation of
dominant community.
Third, mainstream movies like Kalmilata used war discourse to propagate
government’s activities. Contrary to this, independent films (Agami; Nodir Nam
Modhumoti) followed the same strategy to exercise their own agenda to protest
government’s activities. Hence, although independent movies did not work as
pro-government agents, it is undeniable that they tried to highlight their own
viewpoint by implying specific representation strategy around the issue of
Liberation War.
Fourth, process of representation has been changed over time depending
on national and global change. Contextual analysis of state’s and world’s socio
- political shifts helps to unveil the reason behind changes in representational
strategies of films and changes in film makers’ agenda.

22
Chapter 4: Femininity and Female Sexuality

This chapter presents analysis and findings related to the question of femininity
and female sexuality mentioned in sub question 1.

4.1 Three Faces of Womanhood - Service Provider, Source of

Inspiration, Emotional
The majority of women represented in these films were in the role of
supporters and service providers like cooking for the male warriors, collecting
funds, nursing etc. These roles are explicitly represented as less important than
men’s role of fighting. When Khosru (Ora Agaro Jon) was trying to acknowledge
the service of a cook, she replied, “you are fighting for the country, compared to that I
am doing nothing”. While, implicit intention in this statement was to highlight
freedom fighters contribution, another meaning has emerged from the practice
of “private patriarchy” (Walby, 1990) which considers household work as
woman’s ‘essential’ duty, hence valueless.
Guerilla is considered as one of the most progressive cinematic ventures in
the history of war movies in Bangladesh due to its unorthodox selection
women as the main protagonist and thereby, emphasizes the contribution of
women freedom fighters. The director reveals this while talking to journalists:
“Countless women actively took part in the war and sacrificed their lives as fearlessly as
their male counterparts. But when it comes to documentation, whether historical or artistic,
all we find is an incomplete list of rape victims who, too, were badly treated after the war.
Well, then what about the real female fighters? Have we ever paid a tribute to their
immense contribution? That's why I've cast a strong female fighter as my protagonist”
(Munim, 2011).
It is true; Bilkis in Guerilla is more heroic and active than any other female
character in the war movies of Bangladesh. She courageously works with other
male freedom fighters, wants to go to India to find her husband, risks her life
providing grenades and explosives to co-fighters, works as messenger, delivers
supportive ingredients, publishes a bulletin in support of war, installs
explosives at the Pakistan Army’s dinner party and so on. Yet, these are all
auxiliary jobs compared to fighting on the battlefield, which male characters
Alam, Shahadat or Bilkis’s brother Khokon frequently do in the film. It seems
that the film could not cross the last dividing gender line and show a woman
actually fighting in a battle.
Interestingly, the director could not overlook Bilkis’s domestic
responsibilities – she was represented not only as a selfless, committed
freedom fighter and a banker by profession but also an ideal housewife who
could not overlook her domestic duties. Therefore, Bilkis was represented as
the paragon ‘perfect woman’ who excels in both her public and private sphere
as described by Lughod (1998). Moreover, it may be argued that by splitting
Bilkis’s life between conventional binary opposition – public and private sphere
- showing her heartiest efforts to balance between these two, the film indeed

23
highlighted how problematic it is for women of Bangladesh to enter into a
warlike situation.
Megher Onek Rong also represented women’s contribution but again, in the
stereotypical role –of a nurse, a supportive character who rather than acting
agentially, reacts to the conflict and violence around her and to the incidents
happening in her life. Furthermore, the romantic relationship between the
doctor (Dr. Omor) and nurse (Mathin) is a very typical representation in most
war films. When a nurse becomes a soldier’s or doctor’s girlfriend, these two
roles blend into one another.
This is the only one of the selected films that represents ‘other’ ethnic
group. Yet it represents the Bengali ethnicity as superior (Bengali man as
husband, ethnic woman as wife; Bengali man as doctor, ethnic woman as
nurse).
The main focus of the film is to represent an ‘eternal image’ of a woman
as mother. Mathin possesses the urge to be a mother but hesitates to accept her
husband’s previous son. At last the ‘motherhood hiding into every woman’ achieves
the victory. She embraces the child with motherly love. Although Mathin had
several questions, confusions and, objections regarding her husband’s silence
around the matter, by accepting the child she was represented as a ‘good
mother’ who reproduces socially dominant discourse about motherhood: there
is no rigidity of right or wrong in the relation between a mother and a child.
Mother-child relationship achieved more importance than husband-wife
relationship.
Mothers were also represented as a source of inspiration who sacrificed
their sons for independence (Ora Agaro Jon; Kalmilata). For instance, in
Kalmilata, Moti’s mother supported Moti in his decision to go to war. Even
when his dead body was brought back, she strongly protested saying: “Why do
you bring him back? He told me he would come back after the country become independent!
The country is not freed, why did you bring him?” In response to her patriotic bravery
she was admired by the freedom fighters, “If Bangladesh would have a mother like
you in every house, it could have avoided being exploited for 23 years”.
Portrayal of woman as mother and as a source of inspiration is actually a
combination of “motherhood, maternity and sacrifice” – indicating three
essentialist capacities of women – reproduction, child rearing, and sacrifice.
These three capacities are indeed the means through which society maintains
patriarchy. Women’s child bearing and child rearing functions are seen as
‘natural’ and ‘inevitable’. Consequently, inability to conceive is regarded as a
severe threat to ideas of womanhood – unless the childless woman rears a
child of another woman. Sacrifice is the main prerequisite for a ‘good mother’
– it is regarded as the central feature of the ideology of motherhood and is
linked with women’s ‘happiness’. As Seiter demonstrated, “motherhood is
discussed only in terms of suffering and sacrifice, omitting through either
oversight or deliberate neglect the promise of happiness that should 'naturally'
have been the result” (1986:65). The stereotype of the ‘good mother’ supposes
that the capacity to sacrifice is innate in all women. This concept is the product
of an oppressive patriarchal social structure, where this mythic ideal quality is
impossible to achieve, and therefore put extra burden on women.

24
 Aguner Poroshmoni portrays the image of emotional woman through the
character of Ratri who was represented as a typical Bengali woman who
possesses natural beauty but is governed by her emotions - she cries while
reading a novel, suffers from nightmares and eventually falls in love with Bodi
(freedom fighter cum hero). Although for the first part of the film, she was
very annoyed with the hero thinking him just an outsider, when she discovered
his real identity as a freedom fighter; she instantly falls in love with him. The
symbol of his impressive masculinity was his rifle: after seeing him with the
rifle Ratri’s feelings turned around. The rifle made the difference between the
two Bodi’s – from an annoying, foreign man to a lovable man. Here the
message can be translated this way: to win female hearts, show your real
manhood by signing up for the war and wearing guns.
Ratri’s emotional nature is mainly based on the stereotype that women are
more emotional as well as more emotionally expressive and more skilled in the
use of non-verbal emotional cues (e.g. laughing, crying, annoyance) than men
(Brody, 2008). Contrary to Ratri, we see in Ora Agaro Jon the male hero was
urging his friend to control his emotions.

4.2 Imaging Rape

Rape was one of the common themes of Bangladeshi war movies and was
invariably represented as being committed either by the Pakistani Army or by
their local Bengali collaborators. Within the rape discourses in the selected
movies I have noticed three different features, which I discuss below.
4.2a A Distinct Category
Film like Kalmilata represented raped women as a distinct category by shooting
them in parallels. For example, the anonymous refugee woman who was raped
by the Pakistan soldier and lost her husband and daughter in the same military
attack is portrayed as totally distressed, hunted by the atrocious memory and
always remembering her previous happy family life. Moreover, she was
represented as having lost all interest in material life. Banu, the heroine of the
film, was trying to bring the refugee woman back to life but she (Banu) reacted
same way when she too was raped. Although we see Banu exercised her agency
in later life involving herself in the struggle to survive, determined not to beg
for support from her rich uncle strongly announcing, “it is sure everyone will die,
still then we should fight for life”. She also submits to and reproduces patriarchal
prejudices about sexuality and femininity concerning rape. When her beloved
Koli, who lost one leg in the war, offered to marry her, she rejected him saying:
“I won’t be able to form a family ever in my life”. She thinks that being raped she no
longer possesses the capability of morality for marriage and motherhood.
Although she proposes “If any day I can remove this disgrace, I will submit myself to
you”, it is obvious, in a society like Bangladesh, where losing virginity makes a
women more vulnerable than a one-legged man, the woman will never be able
to gain the moral courage to start her marital life.
Banu and the above mentioned refugee woman function as parallels within
the film. Both condemn their fate, assuming their future to be hopeless and
helpless. Such representation reinforces the assumption that all rape victims are
subject to the same treatment, same fate, and same life structure without hope
25
of forming a family or being happy in life. Additionally, although rape is
universally acknowledged as a gendered strategy of war violence, the films
portray rape as an inevitable female fate. So the film also instigates the Bengali
audience’s prejudice expressed in an utterance: ‘all is God’s will

Image 3: stereotypical images of raped woman

Source: Film – Ora Agaro Jon (left, 1972) &

Nodir Nam Modhumoti (right, 1995)

Symbolic representation of raped women through the stereotypical

markers (Image 3) of messy hair and dress, loosely draped sari12, vacant look in
eyes, listless walking, imbalanced and hysterical behaviour, is observed as the
most common way of framing raped women both in mainstream and
independent movies. These common body images are intended to testify to
their shocking experience. Research shows that women may face mental
unwellness, damage to self-esteem, depression, etc. from the shock they
experience (Jordan et al, 2010). Hence, this image also symbolically represents
their distress and victimhood – that the incident of rape demolished not only
their body but also their life. However, when this representation is applied
consistently and stereotypically to every and all raped women, its problematic
link is exposed to the social norms of female sexual ‘chastity’ and ‘purity’.
4.2b Female ‘Chastity’, ‘Purity’ and Three Unavoidable ‘Solutions’
Although raped women of 1971 were declared ‘War Heroines’, their portrayal
in films was as victims rather than heroines. The message surrounding the
‘victimhood’ is very clear - rape means disgrace, shame, destruction,
disappointment. That is why Banu (Kalmilata), Mita (Ora Agaro Jon) and Ruma
(Megher Onek Rong) are all shown to feel that they are “not able to live with such
disgrace ...have lost all of their lives, only death can save”. This is because the discourse
around rape in Bangladesh is limited to a context where chastity plays the most

12 Local dress used by Bengali women.

26
important social role for women (Hossain, 2009). The metaphor applied to
raped women having ‘lost their all’, reinforces a prevalent social norm – that “a
women’s ‘all’ lies in her virginity in the case of unmarried women, in her
chastity in the case of married women, and in a woman’s sexual exclusivity in
general” (Islam, 2009:26). Hence, raped women become stigmatised as ‘fallen’,
‘nosta’ (damaged), ‘sinners’ who have lost their moral position in the society,
and with it a chance to merry their beloved or to return to their husband.
Therefore, relying on the myth of female ‘virginity’, and ‘chastity’, the
films repeatedly used symbolic purging of such “transgressive females” (Hoek,
2010) from society, to restore the moral order. Death is offered as a primary
and immediate solution. Importantly, death is justified by the ‘realisation’ of
the victim that the crime which occurred against her is a shame and she is
responsible for her fate, Ruma in Megher Onek Rong, thus declares, “What will I
do with my life? I don’t want to live any more. I can’t survive with this shame and disgrace, it
is impossible for me”. She decides to commit suicide. Accordingly, Shila and Keya
(Ora Agaro Jon), Konika (Etihaas Konya), Hasu’s mother (Agami) embraces same
solution - either by choice or due to the cruel torture of the perpetrators.
Sometimes even woman’s choice of death, rather than being raped, is
glorified in the films. Bilkis (Guerilla) killed herself through a suicidal explosion
in army camp. When caught by the army and about to undergo sexual assault,
she resisted. Rather allowing her body to be molested she blows herself up,
simultaneously destroying the enemy camp. Thus, the director actually follows
the dominant norms of femininity and reinforced the myth of women’s sexual
chastity implying that death is preferable to being raped.
Another solution prescribed for sexually violated women is – silence.
Etihaas Konya portrays both remedies (death and silence) simultaneously. Two
women – Konok and Konika who were kept in the army camp and faced sexual
violence made different decisions about their lives. After independence,
Konok’s family members all having been killed in the war, both women returns
to Konika’s family home. Both of them remain absolutely silent about rape.
Later Konika commits suicide and Konok continues with her silence.
In fact, in a patriarchal society like Bangladesh – major decisions about
sexuality are determined by the dominant group. Hence, if anything happened
which does not match the dominant ‘social norm’, individuals do submit. The
importance of virginity of women and the ‘established values’ around female
sexuality are important for a woman to be respected or even to survive. As
Konika came back to such a society and she had all the familiar faces around
her who repeatedly make her remember about the incidents and her status in
the society. She surrendered to her life failing to face the ‘society’ again and
again. On the contrary, Konok, being a sheltered woman, and comparatively
relieved from social pressure as she was anonymous in this surrounding, could
manage to hide herself and so she survived. But she became silent.
Silencing the rape victims also has its roots in the silence about female
sexuality. It is a duality of the national politics where by state proclamation
raped woman has become available as a public idiom for female sexuality.
Judith Butler calls this “regulation that states what it does not want stated” (in
Hoek, 2010:146). In reality, the stories about the torture women endured
during war were mostly bypassed as being ‘too terrible to describe’. Over the
27
years, less and less information was available on rapes, with government
officials claiming that the material had been lost, destroyed or was not easily
accessible (Islam, 2010).
We can explain Konok’s attempt to survive as her agentive role, but actually
both Konok and Konika were silent. They didn’t protest, didn’t share, and were
even discouraged from share. They were basically controlled by social ‘values’
and ‘norms’. Representational strategies thus supported the national narrative
as stated by Hossain (2009) and Saikia (2004) where the raped women were not
allowed any space or freedom to speak about the violence inflicted on their
minds and bodies during the nine months period. To avoid social stigma, to
save their and their family’s face, most importantly due to the absence of
support groups, they were supposed to seal their mouths.
Marriage with the rapist is the third solution provided in the films. Shanti
(Nadir Nam Modhumoti) confirms the value of ‘chastity of a woman’ from this
perspective. Through the characterization of Shanti – widowed daughter of a
Hindu teacher, the message is conveyed that even marrying a rapist is more
moral option for the woman than being raped. Shanti therefore asks Motaleb
(killer of her father and occupier of her property) to marry her before he rape
her. The marriage indicates that irrespective of religion and cast, society feels
more comfortable with raped woman marrying the rapist than being sexually
available to a man who is not her husband, even in a war situation, where rape
has been used as a weapon.
Applying the incidents of Shanti to the broader context, it may be argued
that such representation reinforces the socio-cultural values that consider
marriage to be a moral and religious shield. General presumption is that
married individuals may have lower victimisation rates than unmarried persons.
Moreover, although victimisation by violence varies according to gender, race,
ethnicity and religion, benefits of marriage are seen as a universal shield. Shanti
– being a woman and a member of the minority Hindu community, was more
exposed to sexual violence, as well as subject to lose her land property.
Although Shanti is a wartime story, it also echoes Amena Mohsin’s argument
about the situation of religious minority women in independent Bangladesh -
“since the principles and ideology of the state is to privilege the dominant
community, it threatened individuals autonomy” (1984:488). Hence Hindu
women become most vulnerable among the vulnerable. That is why Shanti
needs the protection of a Muslim husband – even the one who raped her - at
the cost of her religion and sexuality.
The case of Shanti discloses the male hegemony of the state power of
Bangladesh that works to deprive and marginalize women from centres of
power. Oppression of vulnerable groups such as religious minorities has a
specifically victimising effect on minority women, reinforcing the underlying
patriarchal nature of the country (Guhathakurta, 2008).

4.2c Masculine Gaze and Visual Pleasure

Jean Marsden (1996) argues, representation of rape is used since seventeenth
century as a strategy for sexual display. Projection of rape in war movies of
Bangladesh can also be analysed as a form of sexual display. The

28
cinematography of rape scenes or the image of distressed women is the
purposeful representation of female sexuality. The literal visualisation of rape
of Ruma (Megher Onek Rong), involves a close-up shot of upper portion of her
body while she is being raped, a scene in which the rapist tears her blouse, thus
exposing her brassiere and focuses on soldier’s laughter and pleasure (image 4).
These shots are an intentional reproduction of sexual imagery and are
fundamentally voyeuristic where spectators are the voyeurs and the female
character’s vulnerable and exposed position is the object of the collective gaze.
A common feature of the representation of rape – woman’s struggle to resist
the rape (Agami) and her eventual overpowering - transform the rape into a
pleasure spectacle, returning to a male fantasy of control and possession of
female sexuality.
The post - rape representation of Keya (Ora Agaro Jon) standing before the
drawn rifles of the enemy was actually erotic. In this footage, she is shown
wearing two pieces of cloth that hardly cover her body. She holds one piece of
cloth over her breast as a cover. The condition of her clothing signifies both
her vulnerability as well her sexuality (Image 5). The way she stands before the
camera, the action of covering her breasts, and above all, the long shot which
pans slowly from her bloody legs to her face all seem to exhibit the rape victim
as a sexual object. The camera traces the contours of her body in voluptuous
detail, actually accommodating the viewer’s gaze.

Image 4: The rapist and the raped woman

Source : Film – Megher Onek Rong (1976)

29
Image 5: Raped women at the shooting target with anonymous persons (left image),
close up long shot from leg to breast (right image)

Source: Film Ora

Agaro Jon (1972)

Visual significance of rape in the war movies of Bangladesh is supported

by film theorist Laura Mulvey: “women are simultaneously looked at and
displayed, with their appearance coded for strong visual and erotic impact so
that they can be said to connote to-be-looked-at-ness. Women displayed as
sexual object is the leitmotif of erotic spectacle, she holds the look, plays to
and signifies male desire” (Mulvey 1975/2001:346). Hence, the representation
of rape scenes is the accumulation of several elements: woman in her sexual
victimization, the camera accommodating the gaze of the viewer and indicating
the intentions or actions of the rapist, and the ideologies of the director
dictating the scene. Therefore, the politics of representation of rape turn
women’s pain into her ‘sexiness’, so rape becomes titillation.

4.4 Concluding Thoughts

This chapter examined the representational strategies around femininity and
female sexuality. Through the application of analytical tools, I have identified
several key features of representation. Women are represented as a supportive
force in war, not directly fighting the armed conflict. The visualization of
women is influenced by the dominant notion of femininity existing in
patriarchal society – highlighting their ‘essential’ femininity (motherhood,
30
domestic responsibility). Women are symbolised as victims of war, particularly
victims of sexual violence. All the victims are framed as a distinct category with
similar stereotypical markers of victimhood.
Within this victimhood, femininity was represented as sexual cinematic
material, hence, subject to male gaze. The context of ‘chastity’ and ‘purity’
determined by the patriarchal society played an important role in representing
the ‘fate’ (rape and consequent silence or death) of War Heroines. Finally,
messages conveyed around femininity in mainstream and independent films are
the same.

31
Chapter 5:
Dominance of Masculinity and the Politics of
Visibility and Invisibility

The prevalence of the war/masculinity relationship is considered to be

grounded on some commonalities like aggression, rationality or physical
courage that are identified both as essential components of war and also of
masculinity (Hutchins, 2008). This chapter discusses how this relation has been
portrayed in Bangladeshi war movies.

5.1 Masculine Men – Eligible to be Freedom Fighter

Ora Agaro Jon is considered as “absolutely a war movie” (Islam, 2001). It shows
11 freedom fighters, all of whom are male and heroic. They dare and are
capable to fight without arms, snatching them from the enemy. Through
traditional and stereotypical warrior imagery, the film reinforces the idea that
‘war is a masculine activities’.
In the film, the group was led by Khosru – visualized as a macho man
(Image 6).

Image 6: Macho masculine freedom fighter

Source: Film - Ora Agaro Jon (1972)

His leadership qualities were represented by his masculine muscle,

responsibility towards the country and also towards his comrades, toughness
while fighting and influences over fellow combatants. On the other hand, he is
sympathetic while consoling victims. However, he reproduces gendered divides
by scolding his friend “we should not cry, tears do not match in our eyes” reinforcing
stereotypical manhood lessons embedded in ‘patriarchal masculinity’ (Nagel
2001). Such manhood oblige a self-destructive identity, a mechanistic denial,
shrinkage of the self that to be a ‘proper man’ one should destroy ones
vulnerable side, to avoid the tag of ‘femininity’.
In Kalmilata, there was an attempt to represent female combatants. Arms
are seen being distributed among them and they are given fighting training. But
32
this promising start reaches no conclusion. In no scene are women shown
fighting in the front. On the contrary, every young man is depicted as willingly
participated in the war. Even Koli – who had no interest in material life or
injustice done by West Pakistan - was accused by his brother of
‘irresponsibility’ and could not avoid the patriotic call of the country. In fact,
this is one of the main reasons why men go to war – to avoid being called
‘coward’, ‘wimp’, ‘pussy’. Avoidance of ‘patriotic call’ may bring the risk of
disdain and separation from the family or community (Nagel, 2001). Thus, to
avoid such discredit and to be an ‘honourable’ member of society men try to
response positively to the call of arms.
Joy Jatra depicts a different story of the Liberation War where a group of
affected people start an uncertain journey to escape. Here, Boidhan represents
hegemonic masculinity. From the very beginning of the journey, he leadership
of the team. At the midst of highest tension he decides to fight declaring “it is
time to fight. Sitting hours after hours made us cowards, we should fight”. In the real
world men take part in wars for various reasons – for money, honour,
patriotism, brotherhood, in self-defence, for liberation, to liberate others
(Cockburn, 2001). But male positioning in patriarchal gender system, and the
masculine identities it generates, ignore these reasons. The construction of the
masculine fighting force dominates : to be a real man is to be ready to fight and
ultimately to kill or to be killed.
Looking through gendered lens, this journey resembles the patriarchal
structure of society – a journey governed by men, and women in assisting
roles. In fact, masculinity is the discourse intertwined with the concept of
patriarchy. The construction of masculinity leads society to establish different
role based differences in sexes, patronises heterosexuality and places one
gender superior to the other (Sowad, 2010). When the group took shelter in a
house to take some rest, there was a clear division of labour: women became
involved in cooking and men in searching for food. Division of household
labour was thought very traditional where wives take the maximum burden.
But household labour remains highly segregated by sex regardless on marital
situation (Greenstein, 2000). In this film, all the characters were not married to
each other. Hence, it is ‘gendered identity’ that fixes the division of labour.
Such division reinforces the ideological framework that essentialises women’s
domestic role as ‘natural’ and men as decision maker, controller, and
breadwinner as their natural vocation.
Within the context of these films, it is also important to locate how the
leadership role is restricted to a particular age group - 25 - 35 years and gender.
There was an old man in the journey who was portrayed as inactive but pious.
This strategic representation strengthens stereotypical normative ideologies
about the qualities of a leader - should be a young male, therefore ignored
women and old aged person’s agency.
From the discussion of masculine characters represented in the movies, it
is perceived that the films followed the normative approach of masculinity
which emphasizes manly ideals, or gender role stereotypes (Nagel, 2001).
According to the normative definition, masculinity is a social norm for the
behaviour of men, and allows that different men approach the standard in
different degrees. So the emphasis on an ideal type of masculinity excludes not

33
only women but many men too. Main focus of this definition is what men
ought to be. Therefore, recalling Connell’s (2001) argument, I would also like
to argue that this idealised standard of masculinity as represented in the movies
can be hardly met by any men. Very few men would be able to acquire this
filmic qualities of masculinity. Hence, the construction of masculinity in films
creates an imaginary picture and idealises specific characteristics of a man
(Sowad, 2010).

5.2 Sexual Victimhood of Men – Under the Carpet?

During the Liberation War, it was also a common occurrence that Pakistani
Army and their collaborators sexually harassed Bengali men by undressing
them to check the signs of circumcision. As the war had a religious and cultural
dimension there was an attempt of systematic ‘religious cleansing’ of non-
Muslim men, “fuelled by an abiding anti-Bengali racism, especially against the
Hindu minority” (Rummel, 1997:335). Moreover, one of the main Pakistani
discourses about rape of women was that Bengali Muslims were
‘Indianized/Hinduized’, so rape occurred as a means ‘to improve the genes of
the Bengali Muslims’ (Mookherjee, 2008). From the same perspective, Bengali
and other non-Bengali men, regardless of religion, were subjected to
harassment through forced nudity in a public place. Looking for the sign of
circumcision Pakistani soldiers decided whether the man is Hindu or Muslim
and whether he should be killed or not. Hence, this was not only a type of
sexual violence that ended with murder of an individual man, but also a
deliberate ethnic/religious, and collective humiliation before friends and
family, before community and the nation, that made a man a victim where by
force he was bound to display his sex organ.
It took 22 years to portray a man as a victim of sexual harassment in a
movie, although, in every movie including the first one (Ora Agaro Jon) the
image of women as rape victim has been projected as a ‘common’ feature.
Only three movies, among the ten selected, showed men as victims of wartime
sexual crimes. Those movies, all mainstream, are Aguner Poroshmoni, Joy Jatra
and Guerilla. Aguner Poroshmoni, directed by Humayun Ahmed, is the first
Liberation War movie that visualized men as victims of sexual crime. This film
has shown the incident of undressing men comparatively more vividly than the
other two. Interestingly, this movie did not show a single image of raped
women, but showed the scene of undressed men and the insult they faced as
the Pakistani soldiers compelled them to sit and stand continuously, in nude.
Hence, this film brings a new dimension into the representation of Liberation
War and also attempts to overcome the stereotypical notion that only women
become sexual victim. Nonetheless, this film could not bring any revolutionary
changes in the pattern of representation as it photographed the nude people
from the backside (Image 7) whereas raped women usually pictured
elaborately, even sometimes the act of rape are shown very descriptively.

34
 Image 7: Sexual assault on men during 1971

Source: Film - Aguner Poroshmoni (1994)

Representation of nude men from the backside reminds Linda Williams

(1991) on ‘sartorial divisions’ in films, as she noted, “men seem to cover up all
the more as the women become naked” (Ibid, : 13). So although three men
were shown naked, their penis was out of sight. This is because of the
tendency of patriarchal society where the camera’s gaze tends to focus solely
on the female body, and avoids showing male bodies. Hoek (2010), while
researching popular films of Bangladesh reveals that except for the intrusion of
Western pornography, males’ sexual organs remain absent from the films.
Strategy of such representation is directly related to the patriarchal,
heteronormative culture where “cinema is made and consumed by men in
groups” (Ibid: 142). For the heteronormative society, showing naked male
body before male audience will not give any pleasure or satisfy the heterosexual
audience. Thus, it can be said that although Humayun Ahmed did something
new in his film, he did it within the dominant gender and heronormativity
frameworks of the society. In addition, the men who were seen naked were not
those belonging to the ‘self’. They were the members of minority ethnic-
religious groups. Visualizing humiliation of those men remains within the
dominant nationalist-cum-religious discourses that define Bangladeshi men as
Muslim.
Two other movies - Joy Jatra and Guerilla - also gave the touch of such
incidents but these films did not visualize the acts. The scenes were
constructed in different ways: as an attempt to undress the men; as a voice
from the background: ‘Oh, it is a Malaoune’13 (Guerilla); as an order of the army
officer: ‘Take off the Lungi’14 and then the sound of shooting (Joy Jatra).

13 Hindus are locally called as Malaoune in Bangladesh

14 Lungi is a local dress used by Bengali men instead of trouser.

35
 The issue of men’s sexual victimhood because of their ‘otherness’ were
totally absent in the analysed independent films. This is surprising given that
representational strategy of independent movies was around secularism,
Bengaliness and against Islamic communalism (analysed in third chapter).
Thus, one could expect that – as a critique of mainstream political use of
religious identities - victimhood of the ‘other’ (such as religious minorities)
would be highlighted. Moreover, as such violence could be construed also as
an ethnic insult to the Bengali nation15, these films could have upheld the
ethnic unity through visualization of Pakistan Army’s misdeeds. Unexpectedly,
it was not represented in any form, not even as information.
Invisibility of men as a victim of sexual humiliation supports the idea that
men’s victimhood is directly “related to the position of masculinity and male
body” within the dominant political and national(ist) discourses (Zarkov, 2001:
78). As the notion of victimized manhood defeats the dominant notions of
power of masculinity, adult men of dominant social groups are seldom
depicted as victimized. This is all the more relevant for sexual violence, where
national and ethnic belonging intersect with heteronormativity. Thus, next to
the stereotypical assumption that women are ‘victim’ and men are
‘perpetrators’, there is also an assumption that ‘our men’ are powerful and
manly, while the ‘other’ men are weak and unmanly (ibid).

5.3 Adolescent Youth - Hand in Hand with Masculine Men

Representing juvenile freedom fighters is not new in Bangladesh’s war films,
yet Moti (Kalmilata) received more importance than any other character, and
was represented as the only martyr of the film. He was symbolised as an ideal
son of the country, whose participation in the war and sacrifice was not born
of his childish enthusiasm, but rather of his highly developed patriotic feelings.
Noticeably, Moti went to war with the permission of his mother, who
didn’t hesitate to allow him to fight because she saw a “different blaze in his eyes to
take revenge against the enemy”. This same mother did not contemplate sending
her elder daughter to the war, but advised her to run away to her grandfather’s
village to escape from the military attacks and possible rape. Thus, the mother
was portrayed as courageous and in a sense, patriotic. Yet, she was actually
supporting the existing norms of patriarchal society where women are not
considered capable of fighting armed conflict and where women’s ‘virginity’ is
thought to be a resource more precious than the freedom of the country. This
is in fact the reflection of “classical patriarchy” (Kandiyoti,1988) where women
nurture patriarchal dominance by guiding the next generation of women
(daughters, daughters in law) with the same control they experienced in their
lives.
Regarding the representation of adolescent youth, this researcher found
some dissimilarities between the representation processes of two film streams.

15Sexual humiliation of men along with women also may occur to show the conquered nation less
powerful, defeated and as a lesser nation (Denov, 2006).

36
For example, Bachu, (Nadir Nam Modhumoti) has been visualized as opposite to
Moti: a symbol of confused boyhood, who is interested in theatre, feels love for
women and follows his beloved without thinking of right or wrong. He is not clear
about “what does country mean’’, “what is this war for”. Bachu’s father’s activities as a
Pakistani collaborator embarrassed him socially. He was judged by his fellow
fighters not as a freedom fighter, but according to his father’s deeds and so
frequently faced his friends’ teasing. However, at the end of the film we see that
peer pressure has made him mature and determined to fight against his
forefathers.
These young boys were portrayed within the existing dominant forms of
masculinity with the aim of showcasing patriotic feelings. However, generally,
children or adolescent youths are compared to women due to their
‘vulnerability’ to be protected. But in these films male children were
represented as being more capable than women in terms of physical strength
and operating weapons.
Therefore, it remains a question, why is a young boy considered capable of
fighting armed conflict, while an adult woman is not? In fact, it is not an issue
of physical power or intelligence. In the patriarchal Bangladeshi society, the
discrepancy in the treatment of males and females starts at birth when a male
child is welcomed by Ajan (call for prayer) but female child is not greeted this
way (Chowdhury, 2009). This is also related to socio-cultural ‘norms’ about
female sexual exclusivity. In the public arena women are seen as sexual objects
and patriarchy is maintained through sexual harassment. So women’s
movement outside of the family is restricted, their education and career is
hampered and parents are relieved by their early marriage that attaches
women’s sexuality to her husband exclusively. Hence, women will not be
permitted to enter a risky environment like war, or any other such situation
where her sexuality might become accessible to other men.

5.4 Concluding Thoughts

Representation of masculinity in war movies followed the dominant notion of
masculinity whether in the case of representing the freedom fighters as heroes,
or men as victims, or youth as the carrier of future adult masculinity.
Gendering of war through the images of male freedom fighters shows men’s
prescribed position and duties in the patriarchal society. Men who possess the
characteristics prescribed by hegemonic ideals are depicted as able to fight and
to lead. The fighter is represented to be stripped of all ‘feminine’ emotions.
Moreover, men’s visualised role resonate men’s prescribed position in the
nationhood as protector of women, children and the ‘motherland’. It is also
revealed that, compared to women, considering all aspects of existing
manhood and female hood, even including ‘capabilities’ of male child – men
are represented as an asset for the society where as women is a liability.
The invisibility of male victimisation is also a consequence of patriarchal
norms, where men stands for strong, active, protector, not a weak, passive,
victim. The representation strategy therefore followed a ‘complex interplay’ of
gender, sexuality and hetero-normativity within which men are not considered
to be a victim, especially not of sexual crimes (Zarkov, 2007). The male body

37
can be naked before audience only exceptionally, and in specific visuals, due to
the patriarchal norms that sanction seeing and interacting with male and female
nudity.
Notably, independent films followed the same strategies like mainstream
films regarding the representation of freedom fighters. Normative approach to
masculinity excluded women from the discourse of freedom fighters, while it
allowed their representation as rape victims. With men, it was the other way
around.
There is a strategic silence in portraying the involvement of old aged
people in freedom fighting. The war activities and contributions visualized in
the movies are restricted to the young and adult. Contrary to that, older
generations were either absent or portrayed in a stereotypical image of pious
but inactive.

38
Chapter 6: Conclusion

This research analysed the significance of gender and sexuality in national

representation of war in cinematic images of the Liberation War produced in
Bangladesh. Throughout the paper, I have argued the following points. First,
representation of nation and national identity is gendered in both mainstream
and independent movies. Both streams have applied particular representational
strategies to promote their own agenda. Second, cinematic representation
followed the prescriptive gender stereotypes where men are strong, active,
warrior and protectors of the nation and women; and women are weak, passive
and vulnerable, bearers of national honour. Third, the norms of sexuality as
represented in the films have evoked existing patriarchal societal rules, in
intersections with nationalist discourses. Fourth, in terms of generic
representation, both mainstream and independent films reflect hegemonic
normative ideology regarding gender and sexuality.
In this concluding chapter, I will summarize how the research journey has
led me to construct the above mentioned arguments.
Chapter three offers that the notions of nation, national identity and war
are assembled together under the signs of gender and twinned senses of self-vs.
other. The nation has been allegorically compared with mother reinforcing the
patriarchal notion of femininity. The feminised notion of motherhood equates
the image of a ‘good mother’ with the concepts of child bearing, child rearing,
sacredness and sacrifice. Hence, national discourse excludes those women who
physically cannot be mothers or who have been raped. In contrast, men were
praised as freedom fighters, protectors of woman’s and national honour, hence
heroes of the nation. Therefore, I argue that it is within the gendered
framework that cinematic representations of the nation “have sprung from
masculinized memory and masculinized hope” (Enloe 1990:45).
It has been observed, independent films were far more vocal than their
mainstream counterparts regarding the question of national identity. While
propagating for a unified, ‘secular’, modern Bengali national identity,
independent film makers excluded Islam representing it as an ‘anti-modern’
force. Islamism was thus represented as part of anti-independence movement.
Consequently, representation aimed towards a homogenisation of nationality,
incorporating only dominant ‘Bengali’ ethnic group, keeping other ethnic
groups as outsiders. This mode of representation supports Gabriel’s (2005)
argument that film production is used as a propaganda tool of its owner’s
agenda. Similarly, the Liberation War was represented through the
dichotomous categories of self (Bengali freedom fighters) vis-a-vis the other
(West Pakistan soldiers) to claim the moral ground of freedom fighters
activities.
Representation of femininity and masculinity in the context of the
Liberation War was framed within social constructions of womanhood and
manhood. The movies’ portrayal in this regard replicates Goldstein’s (2001)
conceptualisation of war as gendered. Battlefront represented as male domain
where women are only supporters, not combatants. Moreover, it essentialises

39
the normative ideologies of gendered division of labour by linking women with
domestic sphere like cooking, nurturing, assisting male freedom fighters.
Contrary to that men were represented as warriors, breadwinners, decision
makers. Even the male youth were represented as the carrier of male
adulthood. Through the stereotypical projection of masculinity and femininity
patriarchy has re-established itself in the war movies.
Eberwein argued, “in the dominant versions of men at war, men are
permitted to behave towards each other in ways that would not be allowed
elsewhere, caressing and holding each other, comforting and weeping together,
admitting their love” (2008:112). Bangladeshi war movies, however, portray
socially prescribed different images of ‘masculine men’ - muscular and
powerful, not shedding tears. The power to provide, protect and defend as well
as to control is symbolically represented in the character of freedom fighters.
Consequently, adult men as victims of sexual abuse were seldom represented:
visualized only once and even then those were not Bengali men – the ‘self’ of
the nation. As ‘masculinized nationalism’ praise only heroic masculinity – as
the protector, vigilant guard of national honour, victimized manhood received
less importance in the representational strategy. Film production of
Bangladesh, being a male centred domain represents hegemonic masculine
ideology and suppresses what contradicts. Such strategies of representation are
grounded in Hall’s (2006) explanation of ‘politics of representation’ as he
argued, “ideology of power fixes the meaning. Communication of these
ideologies is always “linked with power and those groups that have control
over the society, have control over what should be represented in the media”16.
Discourses of sexuality as portrayed in the films have found their roots in the
power relations of patriarchal society.
Representation of femininity and female sexuality carries the nationalist
burden of ‘chastity’ and ‘purity’. As it is revealed (chapter 3) that the nationalist
rhetoric includes only sacred mother, raped women were screened as violated,
disgraced, and a separate category which holds no moral position in the
nationalist discourse, therefore deserves death or marriage with the rapist;
otherwise should be silent about their ‘misfortune’ (chapter 4).Therefore, the
representation strategy replicates Hoek’s observation that “the representation
of female sexuality comes in the form of punishment, first in rape, then in
death. ‘Transgressive’ female characters are cleansed from the order of
patriarchy by death” (2010: 146). Rape in these films was framed within the
historical and political context of Bangladesh and the film makers draw on
cinematic resources based on already established social norms. This includes
the representation of rape within the frame of eroticized female sexuality.
Surprisingly, representations of gender and sexuality did not differ greatly
in mainstream and independent. Both streams were influenced by the
dominant socio-cultural discourses and normative ideologies of gender and

16This statement has taken from Hall’s video speech titled “Representation and the
media: Featuring Stuart Hall” available at
http://media.litmuse.net/vocabulary/bias/representation

40
sexuality. In some cases, this influence is more obvious in the independent
films than the mainstream. For instance, male victimhood is absolutely absent
from the independent films. Message around femininity and masculinity as well
as sexuality are almost the same, differing only in the framing of the war and
construction of national identity. It is noteworthy, while independent directors
aimed at creating a modern Bengali identity and protesting the state’s efforts to
create an Islamic state, they paradoxically followed the gender subtext of state
policy where “women were positioned primarily as wives and mothers and are
persistently bracketed with children in both administrative structures and
development plans” (Kabeer,1991:47). Otherwise, “women [were] disturbing
spectacle, a deviation from the normal order, if they somehow slipped from
their place in the social - and moral – order (i.e. if they are raped or use their
sexuality even due to ensure their survival)” (Ibid)
The use of intersectional lens in terms of age, ethnicity and religion,
though not thoroughly explored in this research, helps to unpack another
strategy about filmic representation. Leadership roles are limited to young male
adults, 25-35 of age, strengthening the normative ideology that only young
males deserve to be leaders, thereby, ignoring old men’s and woman’s agency.
Religious and ethnic minorities were also represented with less importance
than the dominant Bengali group. This is also within the state’s patriarchal and
nationalist frameworks showing how religious minority worsen women’s
vulnerable position and how the ‘other’ ethnic groups are represented as
inferior. When representation is considered as a mediated “reality” related to
power, non-representation indicates powerlessness. Focusing on one group
and excluding ‘others’, resonate with Gerbner and Gross’s(1976) concept of
“symbolic annihilation” - exclusion or selective inclusion, broadens or narrows
the spectrum of views presented.
Examination of representational strategies has revealed that cinematic
representation particularly of gender and sexuality is structured by the varied
organisations of patriarchal society. These representations emerge as
emblematic of an ideal society where gender and sexuality are mutually
regulated17. Consequently then, all genres employ the same strategy.
I hope that this research has contributed to the exploration of cinema as a
complex phenomenon with diverse contents and representational strategies. It
brings to light the necessity of analysing movies beyond their texts and images,
situating them in their specific social-political and historical contexts. The
study reveals complex affiliations of cinematic representation of Liberation
War with social relations of power, and helps unpack the politics surrounding

17Although it can be argued, visibility of incidents does not necessarily means that the director
is in support of such incidents – s/he may portray it from the perspective to criticise the
society. Here the strategy lies – if the director wanted to criticise or question the social practice,
there must be at least subtle message protesting the practice or – must be some alternate
characters doing alternate practices (as we see in Meherjaan). Unfortunately, they were nowhere
in the films, hence give us the message that through ‘reflective’ approaches (meaning resides in
the real world and representation reflects that meaning) (Gabriel, 2005) films actually
reproduced and reinforced existing social practices.

41
nation, gender and sexuality in particular moments of time of Bangladesh post-
independence history. I hope that this study therefore offers a unique
contribution to understanding the relationships between cinematic
representations of the Liberation War and the dynamics of gender, sexuality
and nationhood in contemporary Bangladesh.

42
References

Abu-Lughod, L. (1998) Remaking Women: Feminism and Modernity in the Middle

East, Princeton Univ Pr.
Agarwal, P. (1995) ‘Surat, Savarkar and Draupadi: Legitimizing Rape as a Political
Weapon’ in Women and Right-Wing Movements: Indian Experiences, London: Zed
Books,
Basinger, J. (1995) A woman's view: How Hollywood Spoke to Women 1930-1960,
Wesleyan Univ Pr.
Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2008) ‘Gender and Emotion in Context’, in Handbook of
Emotions, 395-408.
Butalia, U. (1998) The Other Side of Silence: Voices From the Partition of India, New
Delhi, Viking Penguin, India.
Chowdhury, A. (2011) ‘Meherjaan Controversy: It is not About the Film but About Us
and Our History’, in bdnews24.com, available at
http://opinion.bdnews24.com/2011/02/06/meherjan-controversy-
it%E2%80%99s-not-about-the-film-but-about-us-and-our-history/ accessed on
12.11.2011
Chowdhury, F. D. (2009) ‘Theorizing Patriarchy: The Bangladesh Context’, Asian
Journal of Social Science, 37(4), 599-622.
Choudhuri, M. (2000) ‘Gender in the Making of the Indian Nation-State’ in Nation and
National Identity in South Asia, by Sharma, S.L. & Oommen, T.K. (edt), Orient
Longman
Cockburn, C. (2001) ‘The Gendered Dynamics of Armed Conflict and Political
Violence’ in Moser, C., & Clark, F. C. (eds). Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Zed
Books.
Connell, R. W. (2001) ‘The social organization of masculinity’, in The Masculinities
Reader, 30–50.
Davis, K. (2008) ‘Intersectionality as buzzword: Sociology of Science Perspective on
What Make a Feminist Theory Successful’, Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67.
Denov, M. S. (2006) ‘Wartime sexual violence: Assessing a Human Security Response
to War-Affected Girls in Sierra Leone’, Security Dialogue, 37(3), 319.
Eberwein, Robert, T. (2008) ‘As a Mother Cuddles a Child: Sexuality and Masculinity
in World War II Combat Films’ in Gabbard, K., & Luhr, W. (eds)Screening genders,
Rutgers Univ. Pr.
Elliott, B. J. (2005) Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative
approaches, Sage Publications Ltd.
Enloe, C. H. (1990) Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of
International Politics, Univ. of California Pr.
Ferdous, R., Babu, M., Gayen, K., Priovashini, F. (2011) ‘Miktijudho O Narir Proti
Obomanoner Chobi (A Film Disobeying the Liberation War and Women of
Bangladesh), The Daily Star, available at http://www.prothom-
alo.com/detail/date/2011-01-26/news/126435 accessed on 12.11.2011
Gabriel, K. (2005) Imaging a nation: The sexual economies of the contemporary
mainstream Bombay cinema (1970-2000), Shaker Publishing BV.
Gauntlett, D. (2008) Media, Gender and Identity: An introduction, Psychology Press.

43
Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976) ‘Living with television: The violence profile’, Journal
of Communication, 26(2), 172-194.
Goldstein, J. S. (2001) War and Gender, Springer.
Greenstein, T. N. (2000) ‘Economic Dependence, Gender, and the Division of Labor
in the Home: A replication and extension’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2),
322-335.
Guhathakurta, M. (2008) ‘Minorities, Women and Peace: A south Asian perspective’,
Women in Peace Politics, 3, 218.
Hall (2006) ‘Representation and the Media: Featuring Stuart Hall’, available at
http://media.litmuse.net/vocabulary/bias/representation accessed on
12.10.2010.
Hall, S. (1997) ‘The Work of Representation’, Representation: Cultural Representations and
Signifying Practices, 13–74.
Hall, S. (1996) ‘Racist Ideologies and the Media’, Media Studies: A Reader, 271-282.
Haq, F. (2008) Bangla Cinema: An Industry in Decay, The Daily Star, available at
http://www.thedailystar.net/magazine/2008/05/05/cover.htm accessed on
05.09.2011.
Haq, F. (2007) Independent Film of Bangladesh. The Daily Star, available at
http://www.thedailystar.net/magazine/2008/05/05/cover.htm accessed on
08.09.2010.
Haskell, M. (1987) From Reverence to Rape: The Treatment of Women in the
Movies, University of Chicago Press Chicago.
Hill-Parks, E. E. (2004) ‘The Formation of Ideologies in Narrative Film:
Understanding War through Three Kings AND Black Hawk Down’, MA thesis,
Georgetown University, Washington DC.
Hoek, L. (2010) ‘Cut-pieces as Stag Film: Bangladeshi Pornography in Action
Cinema’, Third Text, 24(1), 135-148.
Hossain, M. K. (2011) ‘Fraternal Relative Deprivation of a Tribal Population in
Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh’, Journal of Life and Earth Science, 3(0), 29-32.
Hossain, M., & Curtis, L. (2010) ‘Bangladesh: Checking Islamist Extremism in a
Pivotal Democracy’, Heritage Foundation, March, 15.
Hossain, R. (2011) ‘Meherjaan Ja Bolte Cheache (What Meherjaan Wanted to say)’, The
daily Prothom Alo (2011), available at http://www.prothom-
alo.com/detail/date/2011-01-26/news/126435 accessed on 27.10.2011.
Hossain, R. (2009) ‘Trauma of the Women, Trauma of the Nation: A feminist
discourse on izzat’, Second International Conference on Genocide, Truth and
Justice, 30–31.
Hutchings, K. (2008) ‘Making Sense of Masculinity and War’, Men and Masculinities,
10(4), 389.
Islam, Baby (2001) ‘Cholochitro o Bangladesher Muktijudho (Cinema and the
Liberation War of Bangladesh)’, Rhetoric, Issue – Film (ed) Fahmidul Haq.
Islam, K., S. (2009) ‘Breaking Down the Birangonas: Examining the
Media Discourse on the War Heroines of Bangladesh’s Independent Movement’,
MA dissertation (Unpublished), School of Oriental and African Studies,
University of London.
Islam, K., S. (2010) ‘The Invisible Heroines’, The Daily Star, Vol. 9, Issue
13, available at http://www.thedailystar.net/magazine/2010/03/04/perspective.htm
accessed on 25.09.2011.

44
Johnston, C. (1991) ‘Women's Cinema as Counter-Cinema’, Notes on Women's
Cinema, 24-31.
Jordan, C. E., Campbell, R., & Follingstad, D. (2010) ‘Violence and Women's Mental
Health: The impact of physical, Sexual, and Psychological Aggression’, Annual
Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 607-628.
Kabeer, N. (1991) ‘The Quest for National Identity: Women, Islam and the state in
Bangladesh’, Feminist Review, 38-58.
Kabir ,A. (1979) Film in Bangladesh ,Dhaka: Bangla Academy
Kandiyoti, D. (1988) ‘Bargaining with Patriarchy’, Gender & Society, 2(3), 274-290.
Kaviraj, S.(2007) ‘The Making of a Language of Patriotism in Modern Bengali’ in
Leoussi, S., A. & S. Grosby(eds) Nationalism & Ethnosymbolism, Edinburgh Univ.
Pr. Ltd, p.248-264
Lehman, P., & Luhr, W. (2003) Thinking About Movies: Watching, Questioning,
Enjoying, Blackwell.
Leudar, I., Marsland, V., & Nekvapil, J. (2004) ‘On Membership Categorization:
‘us’,‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ Political Discourse, Discourse & Society, (Special
Issue. Interpreting Tragedy: language of 11 September 2001) 15(2-3): 243-266.
Litchy, L. W., & Carroll, R. L. (2008) ‘Fragments of War: Oliver Stone’s Platoon’, In
P. C. Rollins & J. E. O’Connor (Eds.), Why We Fought: America’s wars in film and
history (pp. 390-403). Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky.
Mani, Lata (1998) Contentious Traditions: The Debate on Sati in Colonial India,
University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles, California.
Mankekar, P (1999) Screening Culture, Viewing Politics: Ethnography of Television,
Womanhood, and Nation in Postcolonial India, Duke University Press, Durham
& London.
Marsden, J. I. (1996) ‘Rape, Voyeurism, and the Restoration Stage’, Katherine, D., &
M. Quinsey (eds) Broken Boundaries: Women and Feminism in Restoration Drama, Iniv.
Press in Kentucky, 185–200.
Masud, Catherine (2004) ‘Bangladesh National Cinema in the Age of Globalization’,
available at http://www.thedailystar.net/magazine/2004/12/03/cinema.htm
Mohaiemen, N. (2011) ‘Mekerjaan’s Women on the Verge’, The Daily Star, available at
http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=171091
Mohsin, A. A. (2004) ‘Gendered Nation, Gendered Peace’, Indian Journal of Gender
Studies, 11(1), 43.
Mohsin, A.A. (1984) ‘Religion, Politics and Security: The Case of Bangladesh’, Studies,
8.
Mookherjee, N. (2011) ‘Mobilising Images: Encounters of ‘Forced’ Migrants and the
Bangladesh war of 1971’, Mobilities, 6(3), 399-414.
Mookherjee, N. (2011) ‘Love in the Time of 1971: The Furore over Meherjaan’,
Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XLVI, No 12.
Mookherjee, N. (2008) ‘Gendered Embodiments: Mapping the Body-Politic of the
Raped Woman and the Nation in Bangladesh’, Feminist Review, 88(1), 36-53.
Mookherjee, N. (2006) ‘Remembering to Forget: Public Secrecy and Memory of
Sexual Violence in the Bangladesh war of 1971’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological
Institute, 12(2), 433-450.
Mookherjee, N. (2003) ‘Ethical Issues Concerning Representations of Narratives of
Sexual Violence of 1971’, Excerpts from Doctoral Thesis in Social
Anthropology, SOAS, University of London. Available Online at
Http://www.Drishtipat.org/1971/docs/war_nayanika.Pdf,
45
Mookherjee, N., 2002. ‘A Lot of History’: Sexual Violence, Public Memories and the
Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971. Ph. D. London: School of Oriental and African
Studies, University of London.
Mulvey, L. (1975) ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’ in Media and Cultural studies:
Key works, (Rpt 2001).
Munim, Riffat (2011) ‘Guerilla: The Making of an Epic’, Star Weekend
Magazine, The Daily Star, Volume 10, Issue 17, available at
http://www.thedailystar.net/magazine/2011/05/01/cover.htm accessed on
10.06.2011.
Murshid S. (2008) ‘Women Warriors’, FORUM, Monthly Publication of The Daily
Star, available at http://www.thedailystar.net/forum/2008/june/women.htm accessed
on 06.06.2011.
Nagel, J. (2001) ‘Masculinity and Nationalism: Gender and Sexuality in the Making of
Nations’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(2), 242-269.
Nash, J. C. (2008) ‘Re-thinking Intersectionality’, Feminist Review, 89(1), 1-15.
Nasreen, G. and Haq, F. (2008) Bangladesher Cholochitro Shilpo: Songkote
Jonosangskriti (The Film Industry of Bangladesh: Popular Culture in Crisis),
Dhaka: Shrabon Prokashoni.
Quader, M., T. (1993) The Bangladesh film industry (in Bengali) Dhaka: Bangla
Academy.
Rahman, A. (2009) ‘Fighting Exclusion: Towards Understanding the Predicament of
Adivasis in Bangladesh’, Political Governance and Minority Rights: The South and South-
East Asian Scenario, 104.
Rajadhyaksha, A. W. P. (1994) Encyclopaedia of Indian Cinema, National Film
Archive of India, & British Film Institute. British film institute.
Raju, Z. H. (2000) ‘National Cinema and the Beginning of Film History in/of
Bangladesh’, Screening the Past, 11, 1-25.
Raju, Z. H. (2011) ‘Cinema, Nation and Communalism in a Globalizing Bangladesh’,
in Communalism and Globalization in South Asia and its Diaspora, NY, Rutledge.
Reynaud, D. (1999) ‘Convention and Contradiction: Representations of Women in
Australian War Film 1914-1918’, Australian Economic History Review, 39(2), 215-
230.
Rummel, R. (1997) Death by Government, USA: Transaction Pub.
Saikia, Y. (2004) ‘Beyond the Archive of Silence: Narratives of Violence of the 1971
Liberation War of Bangladesh’, History Workshop Journal, 58(1) 275.
Samad, S. (1998) ‘State of Minorities in Bangladesh: From Secular to Islamic
Hegemony’, Country Paper Presented at Regional Consultation on Minority
Rights in South Asia, 20–22.
Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009) ‘Men, Masculinity, and Manhood Acts’, Annual
Review of Sociology, 35, 277-295.
Seiter, E. (1986) ‘Feminism and Ideology: The" Terms" of Women's Stereotypes’,
Feminist Review, 59-81.
Shafie, H., & Kilby, P. (2009) ‘Including the Excluded: Ethnic Inequality and
Development in Northwest Bangladesh’, Labour and Management in Development,
4(0)
Smelik, A. (1999) ‘Feminist Film Theory’, The Cinema Book, 2, 353-365.
Sobchack, T. (2003) ‘Genre Film: A Classical Experience’, In B. K. Grant (Ed.), Film
Genre Reader III (pp. 103 - 114). USA: Univ of Texas Pr.

46
Sowad, A. S. Mohammad (2010) Masculinity and Male Beauty: Changing Perception
among the Male Students of University of Dhaka, Lap Lambert Academic
Publishing.
The Daily Star (2011) ‘Silent Features of 15th Amendment of Constitution’, available on
http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/latest_news.php?nid=30610 accessed on
01.11.2011.
The Daily Star (2010) ‘Women’s Role to be Documented’, available at
http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=134331
The Daily Star (2006) ‘Tales of Endurance and Courage’ by Aasha M. A.,
Lavina A. A. and Shamim A., Available at
http://www.muktomona.com/Special_Event_/16December/courage161206.ht
m accessed on 15.06.2011.
Turner, G. (1999) Film as social practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Rutledge:
Psychology Press.
Viswanath, G., & Malik, S. (2009) ‘Revisiting 1947 Through Popular Cinema: A
Comparative Study of India and Pakistan’, Economic and Political Weekly, 44(36),
61-69.
Waheed, K. (2011) ‘Meherjaan: Love in a Time of War’, The Daily Star, available at
http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=169905 accessed
on 12.11.2011
Walby, S. (2000) ‘Gender, Nations and States in a Global Era’, Nations and Nationalism,
6(4), 523-540.
Walby, S. (1990) ‘From Private to Public Patriarchy’ in Theorising Patriarchy, Blackwell
Publishers Ltd, Oxford, UK.
Williams, L. (1991) ‘Film bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess’. Film Quarterly, 44(4),
2-13.
Yuval – Davis, N. (1997) Gender and Nation, London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Yuval-Davis, N. and Anthias, F.Y.(edt) (1989) Women-Nation-State, London,
Macmillan
Zaki, S. S. (1997 "A Brief Review of Bangladesh Cinema", key-note paper at the
seminar of the Fifth International Short and Alternative Film Festival, Dhaka, 2-
9 January, (unpublished).
Zarkov, D. (2010) Handout distributed in class of “Unpacking the Social in Text and
Images”, Course ISS 4313: Violent Conflict, Media and the Politics of Representation.
Žarkov, D. (2007) The Body of War: Media, Ethnicity, and Gender in the Break-up of
Yugoslavia, Duke University Press Books.
Zarkov, D. (2001) ‘The Body of the Other Man: Sexual Violence and the
Construction of Masculinity, Sexuality and Ethnicity in Croatian Media’ in
Victims, Perpetrators Or Actors, Zed Books, 69-82.
Zoonen, L., Van. (1994) ‘Research Methods’ (Chapter 8) in Feminist Media Studies, Sage
Publications Ltd.15
Zotto, A. C. d. (2002) ‘Weeping women, Wringing Hands: How the Mainstream
Media Stereotyped Women's Experiences in Kosovo’, Journal of Gender Studies,
11(2), 141-150.

47
Appendices
(Note: The name is given below under the heading ‘casting’ are the names of
the main characters including the names of the actors/actress within bracket.)

Synopsis of Films Analysed in the research Paper

Title Ora Agaro Jon (Those 11 freedom fighters)
Year/Director 1972/Chasi Nazrul Islam
Genre Mainstream
Cast Khosru (Khosru), Mita (Shabana), Parvej (Razzak),
Shila (Nuton)
Synopsis Khosru – a young politically conscious man joined the
Liberation War and leads a group of young freedom
fighters. His sister Mita – who was a student of medical
college also participated the war as a nurse but raped by
Pakistani soldiers. Khosru’s fiancée Shila also faced
sexual violence who was kept in Pakistani Army camp
and she died at the eve of independence. The film is full
of fighting which is ended up through the independence
of Bangladesh.

Title Megher Onek Rong (The Rainbow)

Year/Director 1976/Harunur Rashid
Genre Mainstream
Cast Dr. Omor (Omor Elahi), Mathin (Mathin), Ruma
(Rowshon Ara), Adnan (Adnan)
Synopsis This is the immediate story after the independence of a
family that was affected severely during the war. Dr.
Omor was detached from his wife (Ruma) and son
(Adnan) in a military attack during the war. Later he
joined the war as a doctor where he met an indigenous
woman Mathin who was working as a nurse. They were
fall in love and after independence got married.
Meanwhile, Ruma, who was raped in war, came to
rehabilitation centre where Omor was the concerned
doctor. But Ruma, hiding herself send Adnan to
Omor’s house to ensure his proper care and place.
Being ensured she committed suicide.

Title Kalmilata
Year/Director 1981/Shahidul Huq Khan
Genre Mainstream

48
Cast Koli(Bulbul Ahmed), Oli (Elias Kanchon),
Banu(Kobori), Moti(Master Shakil), Moti’s Mother (Roji
Samad), Talukder (Mustafa), Major (Sohel Rana)
Synopsis Banu and Moti, brother and sister of a poor family lived
with their mother who tried hard to meet their daily
necessities. Koli and Oli, two sons of a school teacher
Koli was a vagabond and in love with Banu. The war
broke, refugee people took shelter in the village and the
young boys of the village including Koli and Oli
organized to fight under the leadership of a force of
Bangladesh Army. Moti also joined the war and become
martyr. Talukder, who was portrayed in a negative role
used wartime situation to increase his resource.
Eventually, after liberation he was caught by the
freedom fighters who have a vision to remove poverty.
Finally, inspired by the proverb “hate the crimes, not
the criminals’’, they forgave Talukder although at the
end he was dead in a cross fighting.

Title Aguner Poroshmoni (Touch of Fire)

Year/Title 1994/Humayun Ahmed
Genre Mainstream
Cast Bodi (Asaduzzaman Nur), Ratri (Bipasha Hayat),
Motiuniddin Saheb (Abul Hayat)
Synopsis Story of a middle class family with husband
(Motinuddin Saheb), wife, two daughters (Ratri and
Opala) and a maid servant (Binti) living in the blocked
Dhaka city always fearing of military attack. Bodi- a
freedom fighter came with a specific scheme of
operation in the Pakistani military camp situated in the
Dhaka city. He took shelter in Motinuddin’s house.
Ratri was fall in love with Bodi. Bodi was severely
wounded in an operation although the film made it
unanswered whether he died or not.

Title Joy Jatra (Journey to Victory)

Year/Director 2004/Taukir Ahmed
Genre Mainstream
Cast Boidhan (Mahfuz Ahmed), Howa (Bipasha Hayat),
Adom (Azizul Hakim), Ponchanon Saha (Humayun
Faridi), Torofdar (Tariq Anam Khan).
Synopsis The story of the film begins with the Liberation War,
when the Pakistani occupation forces attack a small
village, killed people randomly and burn the houses of
villagers. The villagers’ idyllic existence changes forever.
The survivors have to embark their ancestral homes on

49
 a journey to reach a safe place. Some passengers were
searching for Indian border to find a camp where they
can be trained professionally in guerilla warfare so that
they can fight the enemy. There is nothing but a small
boat that gives them hope to reach another life.

Title Guerilla
Year/Director 2011/Nasiruddin Yousuff
Genre Mainstream
Cast Bilkis (Joya Ahsen), Taslim Sarder (A.T.M.
Shamsuzzaman), Altaf Mahmud (Ahmed Rubel), Mrs.
Khan (Shompa Reza), Hasan (Ferdous).
Synopsis The film is divided into two parts – part one from the
director’s personal experience of war and the other part
is based on Syed Shamsul Huque’s novel “Nishidho
Loban” (forbidden smell). The first part is about the
fighting incidents of ’71, brutalities of Pakistani Army
and their local Bengali collaborators. Bilkis – the main
protagonist of the film – while looking for her missing
husband actively took part in the resistance with her
friends. On the second part, at the eve of Pakistani
Army’s freedom fighter hunt operation, Bilkis escaped
from the city with a target to meet her freedom fighter
brother Khokon commander. Before meeting together,
Khokon was slaughtered by the Razakars and Bilkis was
caught by the Pakistani soldier. While Bilkis was about
to face sexual violence by the Pakistani officer, she
killed herself with a suicidal Bomb explosion destroying
the army camp also.

Title Agami (Time Ahead)

Year/Director 1984/Morshedul Islam
Zenre Independent
Cast Azmol (Pijush Banerjee), Hasu (Sohel), Bodor Munshi
(Ali Zaker)
Synopsis The film depicts a comparison between present
economic status of freedom fighters of Liberation War
and those who moved against the liberation of
Bangladesh. Freedom fighters Azmol and his fellow
fighters has shown passing miserable days in poverty
whereas the village leader Bodor Munshi who
collaborated Pakistani Army and is still doing anti- living
a rich life. Hence he is exercising power over the
helpless freedom fighters that were begging support
from human activity like occupying other’s land
property is him for their survival. The film projected

50
 hopes on future generation expecting that they will
protest against such injustice and bring good days for
the country.

Title Nadir Nam Modhumoti (The River Named

Modhumoti)
Year/Director 1995/Tanvir Mokammel
Genre Independent
Cast Bachu (Tauquir Ahmed), Motaleb (Ali Zaker), Shanti
(Sara Zaker), Akhter (Raisul Islam Asad)
Synopsis During the 1971 war against Pakistan, in a remote
village beside the river Modhumoti, A local leader
Motaleb Mollah collaborated with the Pakistan Army.
Motaleb had married the widow of his brother who had
a son named Bachu. Young Bachu joined the liberation
force inspired by his bosom but senior aged friend
Akhter. Bachu’s unit was deployed on the other side of
the river Modhumoti. As Motaleb was Bachu’s father,
his comrades were procrastination to take action against
him. Then one evening Bachu took a decision and
crossed the river with a determined sense of mission.

Title Etihaas Konya (Daughter of History)

Year/Director 1999/Shameem Akhter
Genre Independent
Cast Nanu (Abul Khaer), Monica (Rahnuma Ahmed),
Konika (Nazneen Akhter Shefa), Anonya (Nasreen
Shiraj Any)
Synopsis The film is about revealing what happened in 1971 by a
Pakistani journalist cum feminist researcher named
Lalarukh. Her quire is for research purpose and she
proceed with her work with the help of a Bangladeshi
family who is also affected extremely by the war that
was not disclosed until the end of the film. The film
upholds the feelings of the family who lost one of their
daughters Konika as she committed suicide after being
raped during war and given birth to a war child Anonya.
The film gives the message that Liberation War was not
just about valour and heroism, rape and genocide was
also equally a part of the reality of war.

Title Matir Moyna (The Clay Bird)

Year/Director 2002/Tareque Masud
Genre Independent

51
Cast Anu (Nurul Islam Bablu), Kazi (Jayanto Chattopadhya),
Ayesha (Rokeya Prachi), Milon (Soaeb Islam) Rokon
(Russel Farazi)
Synopsis Set against the backdrop of the turbulent period in the
late 1960s leading up to Bangladesh’s independence, the
film tells the story of a family torn by religion and war.
Anu- the shy but curious boy of a village is sent away to
a strict Muslim boarding school by his father Kazi – an
orthodox Muslim who dominates his family strictly.
Anu’s uncle Milon- follower of Marxist ideologies
accompanies Anu most of the time with his liberal
belief. On the breaks of Liberation War liberal Milon
participated in the war and become a martyr, extremist
Kazi faced a neo conflict in him why and how a Muslim
can kill another Muslim. Surrounded by such confusion
Kazi decided to stay in his burnt, damaged house
ignoring Anu and his Mother Ayesha’s repeated request.
Amidst of the devastation, Ayesha makes her own life
choice to survive and Anu finds a new path into
adulthood.

52