Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

July 24, 2023

Mr. James P. Rubin


Special Envoy and Coordinator
Global Engagement Center
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20520

Dear Mr. Rubin:

The Committee on Small Business, Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and


Regulations writes to follow up on our June 7, 2023 letter requesting information on the Biden
Administration’s funding of entities that pressure advertising and social media companies to
remove small businesses from their platforms because of their apparent political positions or the
political opinions of the business owners.1 To date, other than confirmation of receipt of the
letter, we have not heard back; despite repeated attempts to reach your staff for an update. The
requested documents were due back to us no later than June 21, 2023. The documents requested
were intentionally narrowly tailored to enable a quick response. There is no excuse for failing to
timely fulfill the Committee’s request or failing to provide staff an update on the status of the
response.

Since our initial letter establishing this investigation, a preliminary injunction on the
Biden Administration’s proxy suppression of speech has been placed through State of Missouri
et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, et al., and the Administration’s Motion to Stay has been denied.2
Members of your staff were explicitly named in the judgement concerning what the judge called
arguably “the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history”.3 The
Committee’s request is now more timely than ever.

As previously mentioned, this Committee wishes to understand the use of any Global
Engagement Center funding of entities whose actions have resulted in small businesses’ loss of
economic opportunities from the freedom of engaging in uncensored speech on online platforms.

1
Letter from Roger Williams, et al., Chairman, H. Comm. on Small Bus., to James P. Rubin, Special Envoy and
Coordinator, Global Engagement Center, U.S. Dep’t of State (Jun. 7, 2023).
2
State of Missouri, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden Jr., et. al., No. 3:22-cv-01213-TAD-KDM (W.D. La. filed Jul. 4, 2023);
see also State of Missouri, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden Jr., et. al., No. 3:22-cv-01213-TAD-KDM (W.D. La. filed Jul.
10, 2023).
3
Id.
Mr. James P. Rubin
July 24, 2023
Page 2 of 2

The federal government cannot circumvent constitutional protections by using private actors to
accomplish what the State itself is prohibited from doing.4

The Committee is reiterating its request for the following documentation as soon as
possible and would appreciate your prompt attention:

1. Unredacted list of all GEC grant recipients and associated award numbers from FY 2019
– present.

2. Unredacted copies of all GEC Award Purpose and Objective Alignment documents from
FY 2019 – present.

To schedule the delivery of your response or ask any related follow-up questions, please
contact the Committee on Small Business Staff at (202) 225-5821. The Committee on Small
Business has broad authority to investigate “problems of all types of small business” under
House Rule X. Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this inquiry.

Sincerely,

__________________________ __________________________
Roger Williams Beth Van Duyne
Chairman Chairman
Committee on Small Business Subcommittee on Oversight,
Investigations, and Regulations

cc: The Honorable Nydia M. Velasquez, Ranking Member


Committee on Small Business

The Honorable Kweisi Mfume, Ranking Member


Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Regulations

4
Norwood v. Harrison, 413 U.S. 455, 465 (1973), “The government “may not induce, encourage, or promote private
persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”; Biden v. Knight First Amendment
Institute at Columbia Univ., 141 S. Ct. 1220, 1226 (2021), A private entity thus violates the First Amendment “if the
government coerces or induces it to take action the government itself would not be permitted to do, such as censor
expression of a lawful viewpoint.” (Thomas, J., concurring).

You might also like