Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 43

RES 1

Lesson 2: Writing Effective


Introduction, Literature
Digging and Research
Paradigm

Presented by: Mr. Vincent Anthony de Vera


Discussion Points

Initial Routine Team Worksheet


01 Checking of attendance,
Mindfulness Activities
02 Collaborative Discussion

Discussion Discussion
03 How to Write an Effective
Introduction
04 Literature Digging
Research Paradigm
Mindfulness
Let’s kick start our day by
participating in this mindfulness
activity.
Discussion
Team
Worksheet
How to Write an
Effective
Introduction
How to Write an Effective Introduction?
1. Look into what the global landscape is saying about the
topic.
2. From the global perspective, connect how it is being
seen from the national perspective.
3. From the national perspective, how it is in the research
locale
4. From the research locale, state why there is a pressing
need to have the study conducted. This is where you will
write your research gap/problem of the paper.
5. And with that problem in mind, what is now the aim of
your paper? Put it in this part.
6. Finally, present your topic and briefly discuss its
perceived significance.
Literature Digging
As a researcher, what
do you think are the
benefits of literature
review in your
research?
As a researcher, you
should ultimately know
the literature related to
your topic very, very
well. An extensive
literature review has
many benefits:
It can help you ascertain whether
other researchers have already
addressed and answered your
research problem or at least
some of its subproblems
It can offer new ideas,
perspectives, and
approaches that may
not have occurred to
you.
It can inform you about other
individuals who conduct work
in this area. Individuals whom
you may wish to contact for
advice or feedback.
It can alert you to controversial
issues and gaps in
understanding that not yet been
resolved. Issues and gaps you
might address on your own
work.
It can show you how others
have handled
methodological and design
issues in studies similar to
your own.
It can reveal sources of
data you may not have
known existed.
It can introduce you to
measurement tools that
other researchers have
developed and effectively
used.
It can bolster your confidence
that your topic is one worth
studying, because you will find
that others have invested
considerable time, effort and
resources in studying it.
Strategies for
Locating Literature
You might find literature related to
your topic in a number of
places—for instance, in books,
journals, newspapers, government
publications, conference
presentations, and Internet
websites.
A good way to start is to identify
one or more keywords—words or
short phrases summarizing your
research topic—that can point you
toward potentially useful resources.
A prime source of such keywords is
your statement of your research
problem.
Research
Paradigms
Research Paradigm
A research paradigm is a philosophical framework
that your research is based on. It offers a pattern
of beliefs and understandings from which the
theories and practices of your research study
operate. A research paradigm consists of ontology,
epistemology, and research methodology.
Ontology
Answers the question: “What is
reality? That is, does a single
reality within your research?
Epistemology
Epistemology is the study of knowledge. It
answers the question: “How is it possible to
know reality?”. Epistemology incorporates
the validity, parameters, and methods of
acquiring knowledge.
Research
Methodology
Answers the question: “How do we go about
discovering the answer or reality?. This includes
the process of data collection and analysis.
Research methodology should outline how you
conduct your research and demonstrate that
the findings are valid.
Why are research
paradigms
important?
Research paradigms are important because
they form the philosophical basis of a
research project. Research paradigms
influence how different schools of learning
undertake research. Once a research
philosophy has been determined, an
appropriate methodology can be chosen.
Furthermore, a knowledge of the
philosophical foundation of your research
will increase its quality and improve your
performance in any analysis you may have
to undergo.
Common
Examples of
Research
Paradigms
1. Positivism
Positivists believe that there’s a single reality
that’s possible to measure and understand.
Because of this they likely to use quantitative
methods in their research. Typically, positivists
propose a hypothesis that can be proved or
disproved using statistical data analysis.
1. Positivism
Positivism tends to investigate the
existence of relationship between two
variables rather than the reason
behind it.
2. Constructivism
Constructivists believe that there’s no
single reality or truth, but rather multiple
realities. They devote themselves to
understanding and interpreting the
meaning attached to an action.
2. Constructivism
For this reason, constructivists tend to
use qualitative research methods, such
as interviews or case studies, which
focus on providing different
perspectives.
2. Constructivism
Constructivism aims to provide the answer to
“why” for example, asking “why do 25 percent of
the employees of an organization regularly
arrive late to work?” rather than merely
establishing the relationship between the two
variables (e.g time of arrival at work and
availability of nearby parking).
3. Pragmatism
Pragmatists believe that reality is continually
interpreted and renegotiated against the
backdrop of new and unpredictable
situations. Because of this, the philosophy
they apply in research methods depends on
the research question itself.
3. Pragmatism
Pragmatists often combine positivist and
constructivist principles in the same research
project, using both qualitative and quantitative
methods to investigate different components of
a research problem. They believe that the
optimal research method are those that most
successfully answer the research question.
Thanks!

CREDITS: This presentation template was created by Slidesgo, including


icons by Flaticon and infographics & images by Freepik
Please keep this slide for attribution

You might also like