Effects of Puddling
Effects of Puddling
Effects of Puddling
Sample had been taken out of the wet condition and weighted. The value was
recorded.
Sample was kept in the oven for 24 hours, oven dry soil sample had been weighted and
recorded.
10ml 30% H2O2 had been added into the mixture & heated in a hot plate till
frothing removed, mixture was kept in a cold place.
5% 100ml calgon had been added into the mixture and stirred; the mixture was
kept for overnight
Mixture had been taken in a mechanical stirring machine and stirred for a
minute, then volume into 1000ml, added some ethanol to remove frothing.
Mixture had been had plunged by plunger for a minute. The reading had taken
by stop watch and hydrometer with carefully at 0.67min(40sec), 120 min.
Before Puddling After Puddling
Core Bulk Average , Depth Depth (cm) Bulk
density Db (g/cm3 (inches) Density, Db
)
2 5.08 0.935
C1 0.916 4 10.16 0.921
C2 0.841 0.939 6 15.24 0.869
C3 1.06 8 20.32 0.779
(Surface)
Surface Soil Sub Surface Soil Deep soil
% (silt + clay) 88.91 66.11 62.96 57.43
Soil samples were mixed and taken into the small metal cup of Abbott’s apparatus. Volume of
the empty metal cup and weight of soil with metal cup were taken.
The weighted sample was mixed with 47.88 ml (12.5% moisture) water and taken into the
metal cup. Medium weight of force (2.59 kg) was used for measuring compaction with 1
impact.
After compaction process, the reduced height of the cup and soil sample was recorded.
sequentially 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 impacts were applied to the soil sample and the corresponding
height reductions were measured .
Small amount of soil was taken from the metal cup after completion of total compaction (at
6 impacts) for determining bulk density of the sample ultimately.
The same procedures were applied for medium and large weight of the metal cups.
With constant force but different level of moisture content:
soil samples were mixed thoroughly and then taken into the small metal cup of Abbott’s
compaction apparatus. Volume of the empty metal cup and weight of soil with metal cup were
taken.
Sample was mixed with 5 ml water and taken into the metal cup. A medium weight of force
(2.59 kg) was used for compaction process with 6 impacts (constant).
After completing the compaction with 6 impacts process the height of volume reductions
were measured.
Some portion of the soil was taken to Al-cup and placed in oven dry machine for
determination of moisture content, mass of soil solid and ultimately bulk density.
Same procedures were run with adding 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 ml water for same weight
of force with 6 constant impacts.
Blown No Bulk density (Db) Constant Mosture %
Blown Size
Small 0 1.03
03 1.06
06 1.11
09 1.16
12 1.16
15 1.16
Medium 0 1.10
03 1.17
06 1.18 9.46
09 1.23
12 1.25
15 1.25
Large 0 1.26
03 1.41
06 1.43
09 1.49
12 1.49
15 1.49
Relationship between applied forces (different no. of impacts with different
weights) and Bulk density of a soil with constant moisture content during
compaction.
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
Bulk Density, Db
0.8 Small
Medium
0.6 Large
0.4
0.2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Impacts
Here constant force was applied with a metal body & number of
impact was 6
Core Name % moisture content Bulk density (Db)
Blue 10 1.52
Brown 15 1.54
Brown 20 1.63
Green 25 1.75
Green 30 1.67
Relationship between different moisture contents and bulk density of soils with
a constant force during compaction.
1.8
Proctor limit
1.75
1.7
1.65
Db
1.6
1.55
1.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
% moisture content
As we know, Bulk density increases with compaction and tends to
increase with depth.
Soils with a bulk density higher than 1.6 gm/cm3 tend to restrict root
growth.
Here, we can see with the increasing moisture content and increasing
energy on the surface of the soil can increase the bulk density.
High soil moisture increases soil compaction caused by field traffic
and machinery.
Maximum soil compaction occurs when soil moisture is at or near
field capacity because soil moisture works as a lubricant between soil
particles under heavy pressure from field equipment.