Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 1 - Santol Siopao - 1
Chapter 1 - Santol Siopao - 1
I. INTRODUCTION
Santol, or Cotton fruit, is native to the tropical countries of Malaysia,
Southern Laos, and Cambodia and was later introduced to the Philippines,
where it is now widely available in most markets Even so, this fruit is still
underrated compared to mango and banana, resulting in waste and spoilage.
Meanwhile, a Chinese immigrant to the Philippines named Ma Mon Luk was
selling Baozi in his small restaurant, which later became popular and relevant
to Filipino cuisine and is now called Siopao. (Fredericks, 2023). However,
despite its popularity, the actual Siopao has a high calorie density and
contains risky components that may include saturated fat and cholesterol.
The previously mentioned problem was compensated by some bakers like
Johnlu Koa, who created a healthier version of siopao, which he called vegan
siopao, a variation of siopao that uses vegetables as its filling (Moran, 2021).
The other stated problem regarding the wastage and spoilage of Santol was
settled by cooking a variety of recipes using Santol as the main ingredient,
such as Sinantolan (ginataang santol), which is even used as a souring agent
in many sour broth and milkfish dishes.
However, the stated solution is still limited in its extent. The Vegan siopao,
for example, might be sold at a higher price since the volume of agricultural
produce shipped to the metropolis declined, resulting in an increase in prices
of P10 to P40 per kg (Lagare, 2022). On the other hand, santol fruit as a
souring agent may also cause some health issues as it increases gastric acid,
leading to heartburn, ulcers, mouth ulcers, etc. (Gaius, 2021).
Acceptability Accessibility
A
Successful
Solution
Affordability Awareness
Process Output
Input
-Grating
-Grated inner rinds of
santol -Chopping
Input
Process
-Taste
Output -Statistical treatment
-Aroma
Product acceptability -Product evaluation
-Appearance
of Santol Siopao -Sample testing
-Texture
-Survey
-Size
Product Acceptability
3. What are the responses of the respondents in terms of the following:
3.1. Taste/Flavor,
3.2. Odor/Aroma,
3.3. Appearance/Color,
3.4. Texture/Mastication stage,
3.5. After Taste/Residual, and
Market Acceptability
4. What are the responses of the respondents in terms of the following:
4.1. Acceptability,
4.2. Affordability,
4.3. Accessibility, and
4.4. Awareness?
In this part, the researchers explained the unfamiliar terms used in this
study, which are the following: