Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Arrest Under Official Secrets Act

drishtiias.com/printpdf/arrest-under-official-secrets-act

Why in News
Recently, Delhi police has arrested a strategic affairs analyst under the Official Secrets
Act (OSA), 1923 for passing information such as the deployment of Indian troops on the
border to Chinese intelligence officers.

Key Points
Official Secrets Act:
OSA broadly deals with two aspects — spying or espionage and
disclosure of secret information of the government.
However, the OSA does not define the secret information, the
government follows the Manual of Departmental Security
Instructions, 1994 for classifying a document as secret.
Generally secret information includes any official code, password,
sketch, plan, model, article, note, document, or information.
If guilty, a person may get up to 14 years’ imprisonment, a fine, or both.
Both the person communicating the information and the person receiving the
information can be punished under the OSA.
Background:
OSA has its roots in the British colonial era. The Indian Official Secrets Act
(Act XIV), 1889 was brought in, with the objective of muzzling the voice of a
large number of newspapers that had come up in several languages, and were
opposing the British policies.
The Act XIV was amended and made more stringent in the form of The
Indian Official Secrets Act, 1904, during Lord Curzon’s tenure as Viceroy of
India.
In 1923, a newer version was notified, the Indian Official Secrets Act (Act
No XIX of 1923).
It was extended to all matters of secrecy and confidentiality in
governance in the country.
1/3
Issues Involved:
Conflict with Right to Information Act: It has often been argued that the
OSA is in direct conflict with the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005.
Section 22 of the RTI Act provides for its primacy vis-a-vis
provisions of other laws, including OSA. So if there is any
inconsistency in OSA with regard to furnishing of information, it will be
superseded by the RTI Act.
However, under Sections 8 and 9 of the RTI Act, the government can
refuse information. Effectively, if the government classifies a document as
secret under OSA, that document can be kept outside the ambit of the RTI
Act, and the government can invoke Sections 8 or 9.
Misinterpretation of Breach of National Security: Section 5 of OSA,
which deals with potential breaches of national security, is often
misinterpreted.
The Section makes it a punishable offence to share information that may
help an enemy state.
The Section comes in handy for booking journalists when they publicise
information that may cause embarrassment to the government or the
armed forces.
Suggestions Made:
In 1971, the Law Commission in its report on ‘Offences Against National
Security’, observed that merely because a circular is marked secret or
confidential, it should not attract the provisions of the OSA if the publication
thereof is in the interest of the public and no question of national emergency
and interest of the State as such arises.
The Law Commission, however, did not recommend any changes to
the OSA.
In 2006, the 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC)
recommended that OSA be repealed, and replaced with a chapter in the
National Security Act, 1980 containing provisions relating to official
secrets.
It observed that OSA was unsuitable with the regime of
transparency in a democratic society.
In 2015, the government had set up a committee to look into provisions of the
OSA in light of the RTI Act which submitted its report in June 2017,
recommending that OSA be made more transparent and in line with
the RTI Act.

Way Forward

2/3
The definition of "secret" needs to be clearly defined in the OSA, so that there is no
scope of misinterpretation. Also there is a need for OSA to be brought in line with the
RTI Act.

Source: IE

3/3

You might also like