Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RRL Final
RRL Final
developing skills needed in the 21st century which includes problem-solving abilities
explore their own ideas, self-evaluate their own learning styles, and identify their
opportunity to choose how they would like to be assessed, and how to develop their
skills based on their own learning styles and talents (Moon et al., 2020).
strengths and weakness in relative to the learning goals and self-regulate their own
learning to move forward and eventually achieve the targeted learning goals.
(Pozas & Schneider, 2019). In mastery learning, the focus is on developing skills
rather than competition. Students have clear learning goals, and the teacher
regularly monitors students and provides progress feedback and feedforward. This
en‐ courages students to self-monitor and re-set goals with their teacher, so the
process is dynamic. Both HET and DI advocates recognize the importance of goal
Flexible Grouping
levels, and the range of abilities and achievement levels is continuously increasing,
as are the students’ specific educational needs. One frequently used way to
lessons using a cycle of differentiation which start with the teachers analyzing
students’ current skills and dividing them into three groups (low, average and high
achieving). In the next part of the cycle, the teacher sets goals for each set of
group and individual instruction. Next, the teacher provides practice tasks that are
differentiated for each group and, last, the teacher evaluates the effectiveness of the
assessment at the middle and end of the school year, over a two-year period.
Overall, the results showed that ability grouping in these schools was mildly
successful. Students in the low group experienced more increases in success than
those in the higher groups. Teachers who were experienced, committed to the
program and focused on the specific needs of individual students were essential to
from implementing flexible grouping. It is not unusual for teachers in the elementary
setting to employ grouping, but simply meeting with various homogenous groups
does not suffice (Smets, 2017). Flexible grouping allows teachers to embrace
different interests and varying levels of readiness within the same classroom (Smets,
need to be challenged.
Individualized Support
After the first ten years of experimenting with the new model, there are mixed
feelings on how successful the implementation of the model has been. However, up
to date there has been relatively little research evidence on the efficacy of support
given in schools and the practices between municipalities have been varying. The
most recent development is that similar model is being adopted also in Early
Often the complaints relate to the required paper work related to increasing
support from one level to the next. These aspects are repeatedly mentioned by
comments by the Trade Union of Education in Finland. One central fear that seems
to be shadowing the effort to maintain good education services is that the ideology of
inclusion is used as a rational to save from sup‐ port services and that children with
special needs are “integrated” without ad‐ equate support into mainstream classes.
towards making inclusion work. One argument behind these kind of statements is
that classroom teachers and subject teachers do not have the necessary skills to
teach students with various needs, an argument that has been an element of
international critique of inclusion from the early years tens of years ago.
Tiered Assigment
their taxonomy are: (1) tiered assignments; (2) intentional composition of student
groups; (3) tutoring systems within the learning; (4) staggered nonverbal learning
aids; (5) mastery learning; and (6) open education – i.e., granting autonomy to
students. According to Pozas and Schneider (2019), tiered assignments are the
most applied differentiated instruction practice. It needs to be stressed that the term
“assignment” does not imply that the tasks need to be assigned by teachers (Pozas
evidence of the significant role that teachers’ use of differentiated instruction can
results have indicated that students’ rating of their teachers’ differentiated instruction
explanation for this result might be the fact that students feel more appreciated and
included in the social emotional and academic classroom setting when they perceive
their teachers’ ambition to provide adequate teaching and learning stimuli for them..
their curriculum materials and what they believe makes for effective materials to
anchor their instruction. Data from Kaufman et al. (2020) and Kaufman and Berglund
(2018) suggest that teachers’ use of materials might be related to their perceptions
of the extent to which the material is engaging and appropriately challenging for
In this report, we build on past studies by using survey data from a nationally
representative sample to examine how middle and high school ELA and
to which the instructional materials pique and sustain student interest and attention.
By appropriately challenging, we mean that the materials address the academic and
components that teachers desire and that are easy to enact or adapt to meet the
spent a large amount of time on tasks that were below grade-level, meaning that
disabilities, from low-income families, and those who were English learners [ELs])
created by teachers were “generally less likely than those provided by the district to
Districts and schools could provide professional learning that highlights the
teacher perspectives and the need to develop teachers’ understanding and use of
the adopted materials while ensuring that modifications do not undermine quality
and rigor.
The literature and studies from the research cited above about
the differentiated instructional practices and the academic performance
in Mathematics have given the researcher valuable insights that will be
used in this study.