FreeCourseWeb Com How To Think Like A Manager For The CISSP Exam
FreeCourseWeb Com How To Think Like A Manager For The CISSP Exam
Thank you for your time in reading this book and for your
support of Study Notes and Theory.
A. Human error
B. Adherence to security policy
C. Confidentiality
D. Shredder calibration
Get your exam mentality in gear to face four choices that seemingly are
correct, but only one will be the ultimate high-level answer. Focus on the
words “most important reason”.
The new CISSP computer adaptive testing (CAT) style exam was
implemented on December 18, 20171. Now you have a maximum of three
hours to complete the exam instead of the previous six hours. Whether
you have just started studying for the exam, or are a few days away from
it, take your time with practice questions. You will not be able to go back
and review questions on the real exam anymore.
With this and all other questions, argue with yourself over why choice A,
B, C, or D is the most important reason. Alternatively, you can also take
this practice question and look for the least important reason first. This
technique increases your chances of getting the question correct by
eliminating a choice that may seem less important than the others, while
getting you closer to the most important reason. If shredder calibration
is less important than accounting for human error, choice D can be
eliminated.
Exam Essentials
Look for the choice that plays an all-encompassing and
authoritative role in all of the other remaining choices.
“Why does the CISSP exam want me to know the most important reason
to verify that there is no data leftover after sanitization?”
Adhering to the security policy is the most important reason to verify the
sanitization process as it will answer the who, what, when, and why. B is
the only choice that ideally would include accounting for human error,
upholding confidentiality, and the maintenance of physical destruction
devices in a policy and any other supporting document such as a
standard, baseline, or procedure.
C. Confidentiality
Confidentiality is one of the core foundations upon which security is
built, along with integrity and availability. Hard drives that contain
residual data even after sanitization methods have been performed
would breach confidentiality, making choice C the next best choice. Why
is choice B more important than choice C? Because it takes a data
security policy from senior management to initiate a data classification
process - to label something as “confidential”. A policy is what essentially
determines which data is to be classified as confidential, sensitive,
private, or any other classification9.
D. Shredder calibration
A hard drive shredder does one thing: it shreds. It does not shred some
or a portion of the data, it shreds everything. There is less worry about
the result of a hard drive shredder containing data remanence than the
other three choices. The sanitization method of physical destruction
provides visual and absolute verification, there is nothing to check
afterwards except pieces of metal. For added security, material unrelated
to the original data can be mixed in to add another level of confusion in
case of reconstruction efforts10. Choice D is the least important reason to
verify the sanitization process.
Think Like a Manager
Data is not recoverable after going through a shredder, and
neither is a hard drive. Physical destruction is not an option
if the organization wants to save money and reuse media.
Always think about saving money while also trying to
maximize security. If the business does not make money,
there will be no security.
QUESTION 2
Rymar Tech's management would like to prepare a
baseline of risks to their organization. They will
need to identify the vulnerabilities that can be
exploited from the events originating from various
threat sources. This information will be further
analyzed to determine the likelihood of occurrence
and the impact it will have on the company’s
operations, assets, and information security in
general.
A formal executive briefing will be held to report
and share the results of the assessment with
mission owners and information system managers.
If ongoing assessments become required to
monitor changes to the established baseline, the
initial report will be properly maintained to reflect
changes in risk factors affecting the organization.
primary adjective1
1 Of chief importance
2 Earlier in time or order
Policies or initiatives are not created for the sake of security, a primary
business justification always comes first. The correct choice will serve as
the overall reason for the new initiative, whereas the other choices can
be ordered chronologically to support the primary reason. Initiatives are
created to ultimately maintain the momentum and progress of the
organization2.
Evaluation
Analysis
Assessment
Mitigation
Monitoring
Documenting
Exam Essentials
If you are still unsure of the answer, take this time to
research each choice individually. The habit of researching
each choice goes a long way in preparing for the real exam. It
is like performing your own due care and due diligence. Taking practice
questions is due care for the exam, and studying topics that still are
unclear is performing due diligence.
C. Selecting controls
A baseline risk assessment identifies the controls currently in place.
Changes to an organization require another risk assessment, after which
new controls will be selected to either adjust the existing baseline
controls or implement new ones. This is not the correct answer because
the primary initiative is to first have a baseline risk assessment to
account for existing controls, whereas the need for selecting additional
controls comes afterwards8.
D. Performing due diligence
Going through an in-depth focused risk assessment, allocating time,
expending effort, and practicing a posture of doing everything possible to
prepare for unforeseeable risk is performing due diligence. Due diligence
is not an initiative, it's an attitude. It comes with being proactive about
researching long-term plausible threats.
A. Data User
B. Data Owner
C. Data Custodian
D. Data Processor
Exam Essentials
Master the critical skill of eliminating two choices to increase
your chances of getting the question correct.
Answer the question in your mind first and then look to see if it matches
any of the given choices. It's tiring, but taking CISSP practice questions
shouldn’t feel like a chore that you just want to finish and move on. Treat
each practice question as if it is the real exam. Any sentence, phrase,
term, or concept you do not recognize, proceed to study and nail those
unknowns until you are confident in the subject matter. Take the time
now to fully research and learn any unfamiliar topics to be better
prepared for the real exam later on, it's worth it.
Three out of the four choices are closely tied together whereas one is the
outlier. Which three terms are used internally to an organization and
which leftover term is commonly associated with an external entity? Also
understand that a data owner is not the same thing as data ownership1.
QUESTION 3 - EXPLANATION
A. Data User
A data user is just someone who uses the data within an organization for
their job function2. It takes the data owner, custodian, systems
administrator, information security officer, and senior management to
make sure information for the data user is3:
B. Data Owner
One of the primary responsibilities of the data owner is to classify a
specific set of data4. Classifying the data means to decide which
information is or is not valuable. Gerard was the first to “classify” the
data when there was no formal data classification policy at DS
Technology. He is doing so using an informal classification scheme of
"important, useful, or negligible." When Gerard takes on a more formal
role as the data owner, he will use the more traditional classification
labels associated with organizations.
Assigning classifications and labels is the job of a data owner. The words
“organized" and "valued” hinted to the fact a data owner is required.
Classification organizes data into different subsets that are dependent on
their value. The higher the value, the higher the classification. The words
“available at all times” hints to the primary responsibility of a data
custodian: upholding availability. This is done through marking, labeling,
or backing up data.
A data owner organizes and assigns values to data, and a data custodian
sets up security controls to ensure data remains available to each
business function. As DS Technology grows into a bigger company, and
given their current responsibilities, Gerard would be the data owner and
Troy would be the data custodian. In exam language, the data owner is
ultimately responsible for the data and for classifying the data. While
initially Troy volunteered to help Gerard, the data owner also would
assign the responsibilities of the data custodian. With proper
governance, Gerard would assign Troy to be a data custodian6.
C. Data Custodian
Troy is the data custodian because he initially helped to archive the data
(think availability and a proper archiving process). More importantly, he
put the useful data to an external server which provides a method to
ensure there is no single point of failure in case of a disaster - this
upholds availability7. Troy deals with maintaining the data for
availability, and not classifying the data. Troy’s responsibility is closest to
the role of someone in security operations and furthest away from senior
management8.
D. Data Processor
In terms of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), if a company
collects personal information, they are a data controller9. Think of a data
processor as a third-party legal entity or agency that handles the data
given to them by a data controller. These terms are synonymous with the
topic of personal data privacy within the GDPR. The GDPR states third-
party data processors must ensure the privacy of the data they are
handling and implement security controls such as encryption,
tokenization or pseudonymization10. Both Gerard and Troy work within
DS Technology and are handling their own data, nobody is processing it
for them. Additionally, DS Technology is not handling private user data,
only data from space. Data processor is a term external to an
organization while the other choices are internal.
A. Vulnerability scanning
B. Penetration testing
C. Hacking
D. Ethical hacking
Choices A, B, and D sound similar, right? All three of these choices appear
to be something a security consultant would be hired to do for an
organization. But because they are three different choices, they must
have properties that set them apart.
For choice C, the security consultant does not seem like she is hacking
the organization, or is she? If the answer is choice C, is there anything in
the context of the question to make it sound like she has ulterior
motives? Or could she just be a victim of circumstance?
It seems like she is going through the steps of someone with the role of a
penetration tester or ethical hacker1:
These also seem like the systematic and chronological steps a security
professional or a hacker would take to compromise security controls.
Yet, a major task draws the line between a hacker and an ethical hacker.
Hint: Has the first and last step of the penetration testing process been
followed by the consultant? Aside from finding and exploiting
weaknesses, these two steps serve to formally validate the overall
process. Which choice would provide a true test of a company's
protection mechanisms?
Think Like A Manager
What process was broken by the consultant that may or may
not discredit all her work? What crucial step did the security
consultant forget to do that can lead to a legal issue?
QUESTION 4 - EXPLANATION
A. Vulnerability scanning
Vulnerability scanning is a part of the overall vulnerability assessment
process. It can be technical in nature using various tools to look for
weaknesses in devices such as routers, firewalls, or servers. Using
scanners is an easier and faster method than using manual methods with
human involvement2. They can also in turn provide a list of targets for
further penetration testing. Scanners have some limitations in that they
use a database of signatures to match for existing vulnerabilities3. These
signatures need to be updated on a consistent basis and especially right
before a scan. An organization should maintain a regular signature,
version, or firmware upgrade schedule in order to avoid surprises.
B. Penetration testing
Penetration testing goes beyond a vulnerability scan. One of the key
differences between choice A and choice B is that vulnerabilities can
actively be exploited in a penetration test, whereas vulnerabilities are
just meant to be discovered in a vulnerability scan. Penetration testing
takes a high degree of skill and can cause real-world damage to real-
world systems. Given this, they also are one of the best ways to
determine an organization's ability to react to real-world threats4.
Following are the general steps of a penetration test5:
Plan the process - Establish goals, scope, and rules. Make sure to first
get management approval in writing.
Gather target intelligence - Identify IP addresses, port numbers,
network drives, host names, applications, or employee information.
Exploit vulnerabilities - Successful exploitation is the core of a
penetration test.
Provide report - Documentation is maintained throughout all the
previous steps. A final report is then securely sent to stakeholders with
accompanying mitigation techniques.
The final report will serve to determine the ability for the organization to
tolerate real-world attacks, gauge the level of skill required, understand
defensive capabilities, and add any additional security controls that can
be used to thwart future attacks6. The security consultant followed the
proper steps, except for the most important first step: obtaining written
permission from the bank’s senior management team to touch their
systems.
C. Hacking
The correct answer is C, the security consultant was hacking the bank. If
the bank hired the security consultant to exploit their weaknesses, how
come she still is considered to be hacking? In order to “hack” an
organization within legal bounds, one must first get permission from
senior management. In this case, even though the security consultant
was being proactive about her urgent job, she did not wait for formal
written permission from the senior management of the bank who were
on holiday.
D. Ethical hacking
The terms ethical hacking and penetration testing can be related, but are
not mutually exclusive. They are both an attempt to actively exploit the
weaknesses within an organization’s system8. Just because someone is
an ethical hacker doesn’t also mean they are a penetration tester, and
vice versa. An ethical hacker is one who understands the path a real
hacker may take to attack a system, but does not do so illegally or for
personal gain - they follow a code.
QUESTION 5
You are presented with a pop-up screen after
logging into a Windows 10 operating system at
your new job as a network security engineer. It
states the following:
A. Policy
B. Standard
C. Guideline
D. Procedure
Exam Strategy and Mentality
Hint: One of the choices is a document that does not have to be followed,
it is a strongly advised suggestion.
QUESTION 5 - EXPLANATION
A. Policy
Policies are high-level documents written by senior management. They
can begin with a general announcement by the leadership of the
organization on the importance and commitment to security. A security
policy does not go into specifics by naming individuals or their specific
roles, but more about their responsibilities, why it's required, and what
will happen if it is not followed4. You will not see the steps to create a
public/private key pair written in a policy. Policies are the master
security framework upon which standards, baselines, procedures, and
guidelines are based5. Policies are official, there is no choice but to follow
them. The other documents are to be crafted to only support and follow
the policy. There can be three types of policies: regulatory, advisory, or
informative6.
• Policy
• Example: Information traveling over Rymar Tech's computer network
should be available to support business functions.
• Standard
• Example: Firewalls must be clustered with high-availability
capabilities in an active/standby pair.
• Procedure
• Example: Open PuTTY sessions to both firewalls
Configure VRRP on primary firewall
Configure VRRP on secondary firewall
Set priority on primary firewall to 100
Set priority on secondary firewall to 90
Save configuration on primary
Save configuration on secondary
Log out of PuTTY sessions to both firewalls
• Guideline
• Example: If failover does not occur, manually increase priority
on the secondary firewall to initiate a failover.
• Baseline
• Example: Firewalls should be hardened per NIST per 800-
417 specifics before being put into production.
B. Standard
Standards present a uniformed and efficiently managed enterprise that
benefits from better consistency, integration, and a higher quality of data
and systems management8. In other words, it is easier for a company to
maintain users who are all on the same operating system (Windows)
instead of having a heterogeneous environment (Linux, macOS, Ubuntu).
It saves time, money, and is logistically easier to apply updates, buy
software, or plan for end-of-life devices.
C. Guideline
The definition of guidelines is easy to remember because it’s the only
statement that is recommended9 - guidelines are not enforced. Consider
guidelines as a helpful suggestion. You can either follow guidelines or
not, but remember they are based on some of the best practices and
methods in the security industry.
D. Procedure
Procedures contrast with other high-level documents by providing
specific and detailed step-by-step instructions10 to accomplish a task,
such as setting up a public/private key pair using PuTTYgen. Procedures
are enforced and must be followed. Procedures are repeatable, detailed,
and created for all users, not just for IT security.
Choice A
Compliance and privacy probably are the most important as they deal
with abiding by the law of the land. The second canon of the (ISC)2 Code
of Ethics states, “Act honorably, honestly, justly, responsibly, and legally”1.
A security professional must act legally and within the bounds of the land
upon which they are rendering services. The law always will supersede
any of an organization's internal policies. These two terms also are
important because violations of compliance and privacy can result in a
monetary fine.
Choice B
The Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) provides a framework
for vendors to continuously increase the maturity of their software
development methods, procedures, processes, and overall principles. It is
not enough to want to have better security, but to know how to plan for
it3. An organization that tries to be better than it was the day before is
one that takes their security development seriously. But should the
verification of a CMMI take place first?
Choice C
There is an urgency for the startup company to find a vendor who can
quickly start to meet customer deadlines. Choice C is exactly what the
startup is looking for a software vendor to do for them. But is this
consideration the first thing that should take place? In terms of the exam
and information security in general, should this chronologically occur
before any of the other choices? Should the startup be talking business
before doing their due diligence?
Choice D
Understanding the risks before going into any venture is a prime
example of a company performing proper due diligence. It is especially
important when it comes to third-party organizations who are outside
the bounds of your own organization’s policies and best practices. A
business exposes themselves to financial, reputational, operational, legal,
and regulatory risk when engaging with a third-party4. Would this be a
good reason for a risk assessment first?
QUESTION 6 - EXPLANATION
A. Confirm compliance, privacy policy, governance, and SDLC
It’s a must to confirm third-party vendor frameworks for compliance,
privacy guidelines, governance structure, and their software
development life cycle. It is the confirmation of these factors that enables
a customer to verify whether the company they are doing business with
is reputable with a strong security foundation. It also can expose
whether the vendor shows a professional front-end to customers, but in
reality, has chaotic and unmanaged backend business structures without
a proper maturity level5.
A. Clark-Wilson (CW)
B. Bell-LaPadula (BLP)
C. Brewer and Nash (B&N)
D. Biba
Whichever the case, please note whereas the core principles do not
change, security models are not rigid in their approach. Each can be
adopted differently depending on the company security policy.
Hint: Look at the word "alteration" and "directly modify". The security
model that provides a combination of both these terms will be the
correct answer.
This model should be used for the new system because the CFO (user)
will create and send (TP) financial statements (CDI) to different entities.
The CEOs (users) will then approve (TP) the documents (CDI). If there
were documents considered UDIs, the CEOs and CFO would be able to
modify them directly without going through a TP. Whether large-scale
corporate acquisitions or a simple billing invoice, inconsistent numbers
will ruin the entire transaction.
B. Bell-LaPadula
This choice could have been eliminated right away as the Bell-LaPadula
model is only meant to uphold confidentiality. It is primarily used in
military or government sectors where maintaining a secret can be of
national importance. For BLP, preventing the disclosure of information is
more important than the alteration of it. Here is how it is done:
D. Biba
While the Biba model does address integrity, it does not practice
separation of duties. Even so, integrity is maintained for subject-to-
object access with data flowing directly between higher and lower
integrity level subjects. Rymar Tech could have used the Biba model, but
the requirements were that nobody except a middle interface was to
conduct actions. Following are the Biba Model's properties:
I. SYN flood
II. Smurf Attack
III. Fraggle Attack
IV. Ping flood
A. III, IV
B. I, II
C. II, III
D. II, IV
This may seem like a short and simple question, but it tests your
knowledge of the OSI model. Not only do you have to know each layer
and function, but also at which OSI layer each type of attack would occur.
Exam Essentials
Each communication device, protocol, technology, or
network can be allocated in a layer of the OSI model.
"SYN" and "Ping" flood are the only choices that directly
provide some insight into which layer of the OSI model the attacks occur.
To figure that out, you’d have to know the protocols synonymous with
using a “SYN” and the protocol used for “Ping”. Knowing this can help
you confirm which of the choices can be eliminated right away.
Hint: The question is looking for attacks that occur at OSI Layer 3. SYN
floods use TCP1, so now you know it operates at Layer 4. Knowing this
eliminates choice B. If you know a Ping flood uses ICMP, which is in Layer
32, then you know either choice A or D is correct. This process of
elimination has now left only two choices.
SYN, SYN-ACK, ACK are the three parts necessary to establish a full TCP
connection. One of the benefits of having a full TCP three-way handshake
is that it allows data packets to be retransmitted if lost during
transmission4.
A. Implement tokenization
B. Request data encryption
C. Conduct a risk assessment
D. Data obfuscation
Exam Essentials
Get to know these fairly new security terms: tokenization,
pseudonymization, and anonymization.
The SaaS cloud vendor can implement encryption for their supply chain
(data in motion) and for their data custodians (data at rest) to uphold
confidentiality. Like choices A and D, the request for encryption stems
from an assessment to see which cryptographic controls are first lacking
and which ones are already in place.
Following are some questions Rymar Tech could ask their SaaS vendor to
address their privacy issues10:
D. Data obfuscation
Unlike encryption and tokenization, obfuscation is not as complex and
merely uses obscurity to mask the data11. Obfuscating data can be as
simple as re-arranging the letters of a word or converting from ASCII to
ANSI format. Obfuscation may not always provide the guaranteed
confidentiality of encryption nor does it use a token to represent the
original data12. The vendor could obfuscate Rymar Tech's data, but it
would be less effective than encryption or tokenization. Still, it would
only be a request after a risk assessment.
QUESTION 10
What is the greatest advantage of an IaaS in a
private cloud over a public cloud?
A. System granularity
B. Dedicated resources
C. Cost-effective solution
D. Multi-tenant architecture
The cloud is the next frontier for the security professional. For the CISSP
exam and the real world, be prepared to know the following cloud types:
public, private, community, and hybrid. Also know the following cloud
services: Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS),
and Software as a Service (SaaS). Most importantly, as entire businesses
or some of their processes start moving to the cloud, it is the CISSP's job
to ensure the security of their data is treated the same as it was within
the organization.
Hint: The answer can be found even if you do not know anything about
an IaaS. All you have to know is the main difference between a private
cloud and a public cloud. Only one choice represents why an
organization will specifically go for a private cloud over a public,
community, or hybrid cloud.
Knowing about cloud types and cloud service models allows you to ask
the following questions, which would help in eliminating some of the
choices:
This may seem like a simple question, but in actuality requires basic
knowledge of the common cloud computing terms to answer correctly. It
is advised to know your cloud.
These security concerns are for when using the cloud in general, but
strongly suggested when using a public cloud because resources and
data may flow through shared systems.
QUESTION 10 - EXPLANATION
A. System granularity
B. Dedicated resources
C. Cost-effective solution
D. Multi-tenant architecture
The greatest advantage of a private cloud for any of its services, not just
IaaS, are dedicated resources for a single cloud tenant. A public cloud
offers their service to multiple tenants who share resources3.
Cloud Types4
Public cloud
A public cloud deployment model has a multi-tenant
architecture, meaning it provides services to more than
one customer and can be used by the general public.
Example: AWS, Google Cloud, or Microsoft Azure.
Private cloud
A private cloud provides dedicated resources to a
single tenant. It can exist either on- or off-premise.
Management of a private cloud can fall on the customer
or a third-party.
Example: A government agency uses an on-premise
private cloud behind a firewall to safeguard their critical
operations.
Community cloud
A community cloud is also a multi-tenant environment
like a public cloud, but does not function for everyone. It
is for a similar community of organizations.
Example: Financial organizations sharing a common
cloud accounts payable software. Data processing
companies accessing a community cloud for data parsing
software.
Hybrid cloud
A hybrid cloud is a combination of public, private, and
community clouds with the workload traversing each
cloud type. Interoperability of a technology between
multiple infrastructures is a key attribute of hybrid
clouds.
Example: Organizations with an on-site private cloud,
off-site public cloud, and an outsourced community
cloud.
Core Concept
Just because something is cheaper does not automatically
make it a cost-effective solution. A risk analysis will
determine if a control, software, system, countermeasure, or
vendor is too costly or within budget for the organization.
QUESTION 11
The IT Department Head (DH) is looking into
purchasing a security control for a system that
hosts processes owned by the Sales program
manager. The system is valued at $5,000,000. The
options for the cost of the control are either
$2,000,000 from one vendor or $4,000,000 from a
different vendor. The IT department initially
chooses the $4,000,000 purchase option, but the
head of Sales interjects and requests an analysis
comparing the two different solutions. After some
discussion, both departments decide to go with
the $2,000,000 solution.
A. Data owner
B. System owner
C. Business owner
D. Data processor
A lot of numbers are thrown around in this question. Does that mean you
should immediately start remembering the formulas for single loss
expectancy (SLE) or the annual loss expectancy (ALE)? Not always.
Remember the CISSP exam is not a math test, it is a test of concepts and
managerial thought process. However, it's still important to know the
formula for calculating both the SLE and ALE1:
SLE = Asset Value x Exposure Factor
ALE = SLE x ARO
(ARO stands for annualized rate of occurrence)
We are given the asset value of $5,000,000, but not the exposure factor -
we will not be able to determine the SLE. Because we cannot determine
the SLE, we are unable to determine the ARO. When values are missing,
the correct choice will be determined by knowing the concepts.
• A. Data owner
• Who is the data owner? Is anyone in the Sales or IT department a
data owner? If so, what “data” do they own?
• B. System owner
• What exactly is a system owner?
• What is the difference between a data and system owner? Or are
they the same entity?
• C. Business owner
• How does the role of business owner differ from a data or system
owner?
• D. Data processor
• How come choices A, B, and C end in “owner” and choice D ends in
“processor”?
Even without being given the details of the "discussion", which entity
would have the ultimate decision about spending money?
Hint: Out of the four choices, the role with "owner" at the end of it is the
correct answer. When it comes to financial decisions, the buck stops with
someone who has final ownership.
IT wanted to go with the most expensive control, but the head of Sales
had a problem with that decision. What could have been the intention to
request an analysis of the two prices in order to use the cheaper option?
Whatever the reason, think about whether the request of a system owner
would supersede a business owner. Does a data owner have any say on
purchasing new systems?
B. System owner
Let’s say a network security engineer manages the firewall for Rymar
Tech, a company in the middle of a huge project to migrate their
database and file servers to a new location. Under the direction of the IT
DH, multiple change requests are being issued for both the servers and
the firewalls protecting those servers. A security engineer will configure
ACLs, VPNs, and NAT among other necessary changes on the firewall.
Then a server administrator will make changes on each server such as
creating new passwords, updating the operating system, setting RDP
access levels, disabling NetBIOS over TCP/IP, or configuring allowable
Kerberos encryption types. The changes to the firewall and servers will
support the business processes. In this case, the IT DH is the system
owner4. This person knows how the system works, supports making
required security changes on the system, and understands the value the
system will provide to support the business.
Exam Essentials
Different books and study guides have various definitions of
system owners, as well as NIST 800-185. As with everything
CISSP, knowing the exact definition is not necessary, know the general
concept.
C. Business owner
Ideally, there should be a compromise between security and cost. IT
chose a control that did not cost more than the system itself, but it still
was the more expensive control. Perhaps IT saw new and advanced
technologies that would better protect their systems. But the business
owner may have thought the control picked by IT went overboard or
maybe the $4,000,000 control provided more security than necessary.
After further analysis, the cheaper option was chosen. Either way, IT still
has a control that provides adequate security, and the business owner
just saved the company $2,000,000. Bottom line: the role of the business
owner grants them the authority to put cost over security if necessary.
The business owner cares about maximizing value and profit6. IT does
not generate profit for the company; information technology actually is
an expenditure. The Sales team makes money. Human life is always the
#1 priority in an organization, but making money is a close second.
Security professionals want the very best technology when protecting
business processes. This does not always align with the mindset of a
business owner, or the CISSP exam. The best is not always the most cost-
effective. The cheaper option was chosen to control cost.
A. Nonrepudiation
B. Confidentiality
C. Integrity
D. Authentication
Cryptography provides a high degree of trust that the data we are storing
and sending back and forth retains its confidentiality, privacy and
integrity.
If you have no idea how to even begin answering the question, then try to
eliminate which basic cryptographic service has been provided. For
example, we know the secret message will be hashed with the SHA256
algorithm. This means at some point the service of integrity has been
provided2, eliminating choice C as the correct answer. Cryptography also
provides confidentiality, authentication, and nonrepudiation3, so what
still has not been achieved by the CISO? To fully understand the choices,
start by learning about asymmetric encryption, public key infrastructure
(PKI), hashing algorithms, and how a VPN works.
The CISO's objective is to get a secret message to her CEO. If it were not
blocked, a remote VPN would have provided confidentiality, integrity,
and authentication4. Does that make nonrepudiation the correct answer?
No, because nonrepudiation was achieved when the CISO signed the hash
with her private key. Digitally signing a message means a sender can
never deny sending the message (assuming the sender is always in
possession of their private key). This leaves us with either choice B or D.
How has confidentiality or authentication not been achieved by the
CISO's actions? The security officer's suggestion is not wrong; however,
it doesn't go far enough to achieve the full measure of the security
considerations that should be taken by the CISO.
SENDER'S RESPONSIBILITY9
• Step 1 - Create plaintext message
• No cryptographic service
• Step 2 - Hash plaintext message with SHA256
• The resulting hash digest provides maintenance of integrity
• Step 3 - Sign the resulting hash with private key
• This provides nonrepudiation and authentication
• Step 4 - Send plaintext message and digitally signed hash
• Appending the plaintext to the signed hash lets the receiver, or
anyone else, read and confirm the message has not been changed in
transit. There is no confidentiality provided
RECEIVER'S RESPONSIBILITY11
• Step 1 - Receive digital signature and plaintext message
• Receives signed hash and plaintext message
• Step 2 - Decrypt the signed hash with sender public key
• Decryption with public key reveals original SHA256 hash
• Step 3 - Hash plaintext message with SHA256
• Hash plaintext to compare to the decrypted SHA256 hash
• Step 4 - Compare decrypted hash with computed hash
• Message integrity is intact if both hash digests match
Exam Essentials
The word “least” means that all the choices are close to being
correct, but one choice did not play as important of a role as
the other choices. It takes a complete analysis of the question context
and the choices to figure out which one is the “least” important.
Hint: The primary site was unavailable but then rapidly made available
by a hot site. Which of the choices is most likely not required for this type
of site? Did all the choices contribute equally to the BCP/DRP?
Recovery means to restore critical business functions at the hot site and
restoration means to build and repair the damage caused by the
earthquake at the primary site1.
Core CISSP Concept
High-level policies matter more than low-level operations.
For the CISSP exam, high-level security objectives must be
complete before any of the objectives in security operations.
If there is something that is going to be the “least” useful,
then it is going to be something that has to do with low-level
operations.
Cold Site2 A cold site does not contain any of the infrastructure, systems,
or software required to bring up the organization right after a disaster.
At the least, it will contain the HVAC, plumbing, electrical wiring, and
some furniture. Everything else required to bring up the site will have to
be delivered at the time of the disaster. Cold sites provide a low-cost
solution with the longest recovery time.
Warm Site3 Associate the word “partial” when thinking of a warm site;
everything is partially ready. Routers, switches, firewalls, or servers may
be ready, they just need to be physically connected. The initial network
connectivity may need to be set up. Server images, ISOs, or data may still
need to be delivered to the site. Warm sites provide a medium-cost
solution with a medium-length recovery time.
Hot Site4 For a company that requires a fully operational site with
critical networking hardware, server software, and capacity
considerations ready to go immediately or within a few short hours,
regardless of the cost, hot sites are the solution. Depending on their
BCP/DRP planning, data may already be at the hot site via backups,
remote journaling, or electronic vaulting. This type of assurance comes
with a heavy cost as hot sites are the most expensive solution with the
shortest recovery time.
B. Standardized assets
The standardization of assets can provide the confidence necessary for a
smooth BCP/DRP process. Imagine your organization experiences a total
disaster, transfers to a warm site, then realizes that the disaster recovery
team brought over copies of Windows when the recovery site only has
machines available for Linux distributions. This considerable difference
can make or break an organization’s maximum tolerable downtime
during BCP/DRP. It is important to make sure the equipment used at the
primary business site matches that of the recovery site. For maximum
efficiency, standards should be mandatory6.
A. Two-tier I
B. Two-tier II
C. Three-tier I
D. Three-tier II
DMZ is Required
Since a DMZ is "required", it means at least three choices contain a DMZ
network. If all choices contain a DMZ, then it’s a matter of looking at
which of the other requirements are missing. DMZs are traditionally
separated from the internal network, so even a single firewall
architecture will be able to have multiple networks. Firewalls
traditionally contain multiple interfaces for segmenting multiple
networks.
Exam Essentials
Different terminology exists for firewalls and networking.
For the exam, stick with the terms in the official guides.
With the pen and paper provided at the testing center, quickly sketch out
what an architecture with two firewalls protecting a DMZ and a private
network would look like. Chances are you will draw the one with the
least administrative overhead first.
While this architecture has a DMZ and is easier to manage than the other
choices, it consists of only one deployed firewall.
B. Two-tier II
Two-tier II deployments practice defense-in-depth, as it requires two
firewalls to inspect traffic inbound to the private network4. A DMZ exists
inline and is protected by the first firewall. This deployment requires
increased routing and access-control rules.
Choice B meets the requirements of at least two firewalls, a DMZ, and of
all the other choices, has the least administrative complexity.
C. Three-tier I
Three-tier systems can be the most secure as traffic is filtered from
subnet-to-subnet until reaching the private network. Three-tier I
deployments consist of three firewalls5. A single routing change on the
network may require updated routes and ACLs on all three firewalls,
making them the most complex architecture to manage.
D. Three-tier II
This matches the two-tier II deployment in terms of the DMZ and
number of firewalls used, but this design also creates a transaction
subnet between the two firewalls that must be managed6.
The transaction subnet creates an added layer of administrative
complexity just like with three-tier I deployments.
The CISSP is not about getting into the real specifics of a topic. Think
about who is involved in this situation? What were their responsibilities?
Did anyone fail to do their job? Did Rymar Tech do everything in their
power to control this type of risk?
If not, what would lessen the risk of this type of incident from happening
again? Would any other types of laws have been broken if Rymar Tech's
security guards tried to physically stop and search the employee?
Exam Essentials
The "best” choice requires applying deep-level CISSP
concepts. The answer cannot be looked up in a book.
Security breaches have become serious business as they can lead to fines,
firings, class-action lawsuits2, and business closures.
Hint: Here is the secret to getting this question correct: know the
difference between due care and due diligence. Think of which one will
be scrutinized in an investigation from a legal standpoint.
QUESTION 15 - EXPLANATION
A. Compliance
Privacy and the right to privacy has brought the creation of multiple laws
and regulations in order to better protect private information. The GDPR,
PCI DSS, and PIPEDA are forms of privacy protection laws aimed at
making sure organizations are doing their due care to keep user
information safe3. Failure to follow compliance can result in legal action
that could incur multiple fines and penalties4. Making sure to understand
compliance requirements is a part of the due diligence process, while
implementing the controls to uphold compliance would be due care.
Rymar Tech was not following any particular compliance, nor is it a
reason to reduce fines if followed.
B. Due diligence
Conducting due diligence falls on the responsibility of those in senior
management. It is the act of due diligence that results in the actions of
due care; for without due diligence there is no due care5. Disabling
personal USB drives on corporate computers (technical), conducting
background checks (administrative), having security guards, CCTVs, and
badge readers (physical) are examples of due care security controls.
These controls only exist as a result of policies created by a wider risk-
focused research program initiated by management.
The due diligence done before the breach is proactive, while due
diligence after the breach is reactive. Reactive due diligence is about
understanding the reason behind an incident, event, or breach and
making sure the steps to rectify the situation are done within measured
risk parameters. Whether it is mandated from within the company or
under legal action, due diligence has the primary responsibility of
making sure the same incident does not occur twice.
C. Due care
A lack of assigned due care controls by executives can lead to legal
action6. For Rymar Tech, the fines were reduced because they had in
place adequate technical, administrative, and physical due care security
controls. Despite the insider attack being able to circumvent the controls,
the company was proactive in their approach to risk management. It
takes due diligence to make sure all these due care measures are in place
and continuously maintained. Essentially, Rymar Tech did everything
they could to mitigate their risk of a data breach, just short of a full body
search. They were not able to completely eliminate this risk. Moving
forward, a policy limiting employee privacy in the workplace could
provide a pathway to search personal employee property, including
emptying out pockets.
D. Risk assessments
Conducting proper risk assessments throughout the organization at least
once a year is a part of performing due diligence. The results of a risk
assessment are the formal way to determine due care controls.
Exam Essentials
Sometimes due care is an action that should most likely be
taken, and due diligence is an action that may not be
necessary, but is best for the long-term.
QUESTION 16
Rymar Tech is conducting a quantitative analysis
of their financial file server. The SLE for the server
is $50,000. The organization wants to account for
the file server to fail once every two years. Three
different managers have provided their
suggestions for the necessary security controls
required to protect the file server from a potential
breach, denial of service, or other types of
compromise.
Hint: It is best to calculate the value of the asset first and then compare it
to the cost of the suggested controls.
Exam Essentials
Study the technical terms and concepts in order to
understand the question, not to answer it.
If the value of the file server is $50,000, and it fails once every two years,
then the annual loss will be $25,000.
B. Manager 2
When a badge and PIN are used for gaining access to an asset, two-factor
authentication is taking place6. By removing the use of a badge and a PIN,
Manager 2 has actually made access to the file server less secure, as two-
factor authentication is more secure than single-factor authentication
any day of the week. If a biometric system replaced both these two forms
of authentication, it would be using single-factor authentication. As
technologically accurate as it may be, a biometric system by itself is just
proving something you are. Entering biometric information coupled with
something you have (badge) or something you know (PIN) would work
better to uphold confidentiality and integrity. From a manager’s
perspective, biometric devices are an expensive cost. It costs money not
just to buy it, but to hire the professionals who need to administer the
system, enroll users, generate templates, balance the crossover error
rate, and provide continuous administrative support7. Ultimately,
Manager 2’s suggestion is not the most effective choice because it
increases cost and lessens the security posture of the organization.
C. Manager 3
Manager 3’s suggestion is not correct due to: the addition of a load
balancer. A load balancer is meant to mathematically distribute network
traffic proportionally across multiple servers or network devices8. The
question focuses only on one financial file server. There is not another
server to distribute the traffic load coming into the network; a load
balancer is not necessary. The cost of an additional IPS, IDS, load
balancer, and hot site were not mentioned and they all combined could
have been more or less than the cost of the file server itself, but that was
not the determining factor. However, all the additional devices sans the
load balancer could provide adequate security for the file server
depending on cost.
D. Manager 1 & 3
Only Manager 1’s suggestion is correct.
QUESTION 17
A security operations center (SOC) has lost three
firewall engineers and does not have the budget to
hire replacements. Management has given Casey,
the service desk technician, the additional
responsibility of only viewing firewall
configurations for customer tickets. She is to make
sure the right firewall policies, VPN usernames,
and network address translation rules exist on the
firewall, as well as verifying if site-to-site IPSec
tunnels are active. The security administrator has
created an account for Casey that enables her to
view the firewall configuration and deploy any
necessary changes as long as it is approved by a
senior engineer.
A. Need to know
B. Least privilege
C. Job rotation
D. Separation of duties
Casey's current role deals with service desk tasks and not firewall issues.
She would not have as much experience in her new technical role as the
previous SOC engineers. This can lead to mistakes and has to be
accounted for when considering what level of access to provide Casey. In
this regard, the systems administrator has given her read access as well
as write access, but only with prior approval. This follows a proper
change management process in security operations.
Casey's new role will require an additional level of need to know access.
Least privilege will then further restrict that access to just the tasks
related to her job. Presently, Casey has not only need to know access to
perform her job as a service desk technician, but will also require read-
only access to the firewalls.
In due time, when more engineers have been hired, Casey's firewall
rights and privileges will have to be revoked. The glaring security flaw
that has not been followed will stand out to two types of people: security
professionals with years of experience or those who have thoroughly
understood their CISSP concepts. There is no experience requirement to
take the CISSP exam, but it is highly recommended. Spending time
understanding concepts, whether at work or at home, is the only way to
gain security knowledge and to accumulate the wisdom to fix broken
processes.
QUESTION 17 - EXPLANATION
A. Need to know
Giving only the access required to do the job is practicing proper need to
know4. The goal of implementing need to know is to prevent unapproved
access. This was followed when management gave Casey need to know
access to customer firewalls in order to accommodate her new job role.
However, she is supposed to be only "viewing" and "verifying" the
configurations, as management did not state she is to make any kind of
changes to the firewall. The security administrator fulfilled Casey's need
to know by creating a firewall account to view the configuration, but
violated the directive by also allowing Casey to deploy changes. This is
not the correct choice because Casey was given need to know access to
the firewall, but her least privilege was not restricted to just read
operations.
B. Least privilege
By allowing Casey to have write access to the firewall as well as read-
only access, the security administrator failed to follow the principle of
least privilege. Least privilege will fine-tune a subject's access to an
object by assigning just the very minimum rights and permissions to it5.
Casey required need to know access to the firewall with management's
permission to read configurations only, not the additional privilege to
make actual changes.
C. Job rotation
One of the primary reasons to enforce job rotation is to uncover or
minimize the acts of collusion and fraud7. If a user knows that someone
else will come in and perform their job for a while, they are less likely to
commit a crime. While job rotation may commonly mean a previous
position was relinquished, in Casey's circumstance she was temporarily
rotated to an engineering role while also maintaining her service desk
role. This goes along with the secondary reasons for job rotation: backup
for employee shortages, preparation for a succession plan, and
improvement of skills.
D. Separation of duties
Separation of duties prevents a single person from performing a high-
impact task8. A single firewall engineer who can request, design, and
implement changes to a firewall by themselves and without permission,
has a significant degree of power. They can collude with outside entities
to give them unfettered access to the protected network behind the
firewall, or the firewall itself. Even if a security professional remains
virtuous, a compromise of their own account would lead to the attacker
now having the same access. Even though it was a mistake for the
security administrator to give Casey write access to the firewall,
separation of duties still was followed as all changes had to be first
approved by a senior engineer.
Exam Essentials
Need to know, least privilege, and separation of duties are
preventative controls9. Job rotation is a detective control10
(meant to uncover, not prevent). All four choices fall under
administrative controls.
QUESTION 18
Expenses, extra responsibilities, and reduced
profits are a result of what?
A. Security
B. Efficiency
C. Convenience
D. Operability
Only one of the choices will result in all three of the outcomes presented
in this question. Ideally, a business would like to attain all four of the
choices: maximum security, high efficiency, ultra-convenience, and
smooth operability. Each of the choices has its own strengths and
weaknesses.
Security
Think of how security is perceived during our CISSP exam studies. Is
security a negative or positive addition to an organization? Does a
business actively seek out security? Does it look to security to lower
expenses, reduce responsibilities, or increase profits? Would security be
an obstacle, necessity, or a cost which contributes to or reduces these
effects? Emotionally, think of how you and your fellow security
professionals feel about security as compared to your senior
management team.
Efficiency
High efficiency--that is a manager’s dream. Efficiency for a business
means to squeeze every bit of work out of daily tasks in order to further
focus on more complex problems. Developers want to focus on building
new software, not to keep patching and updating old software. Network
engineers want to fine-tune the organization’s bandwidth usage, not
continuously troubleshoot connectivity issues. By increasing efficiency,
we also are increasing the effectiveness of measured security controls.
Would this result in any of the outcomes in the question?
Convenience
Security professionals and business executives may not consider
convenience to be one of their top priorities, yet it absolutely must be.
Not everyone in a company may be highly technical or aware of security
in their role, so some require a modest level of convenience to perform
their job. When employees can perform their job, productivity goes up.
We can say that convenience can increase productivity, which will
increase profits. As a CISSP, we must provide a balance between security
and user convenience. For example, two-factor authentication is useless
if a user does not know how to correctly use it.
Operability
Operability can be likened to reliability in that there is a high degree of
confidence that something will work from start to finish. A security
professional may practice a “security” mindset at their organization, but
if that same security professional were to go skydiving, they would want
the parachute to have greater operability instead of a high level of
security. In an enterprise, operability and security must be balanced to
provide something that works as it is supposed to and with the least
amount of risk while doing so. When it comes down to it, is operability
expected to increase expenses or revenue for the company? Will it add
more work to maintain a certain level of operability? Will it cut into the
bottom line?
B. Efficiency
Peak efficiency and effectiveness of programs and systems occur if they
are operating as intended, have correctly implemented security controls,
and are meeting desired outcomes3. If an intrusion prevention system
(IPS) is blocking network traffic containing malicious signatures, it is
operating as intended. Security controls such as frequent IPS signature
updates, restrictive access control, and high-availability add to its
desired effectiveness in reducing the total amount of security incidents.
Expenses are lowered, additional responsibilities are not necessary, and
profits are increased when a company does not have to deal with
frequent security events.
C. Convenience
Security is not here to be convenient, but security and convenience have
to play nice with each other. If users find memorizing long and complex
passwords too inconvenient, they will write it down on a piece of paper.
To provide both convenience and security, the security advisor can
suggest using passphrases, as they are easier to remember while
satisfying password complexity requirements.
D. Operability
The CISSP is an exam for security professionals, but it also takes a
business executive's frame of mind to succeed. Both want a secure and
operational system, but given a choice, operability drives the business. At
the same time, operability needs the functions of security to prevent or
lessen its own downtime. Operability is not an added expense with extra
responsibilities that cuts into the profit margin; operability is mandatory.
The result of operability is a functioning business continuing to be fully
engaged in cutting cost, reducing overhead, and focusing on profits.
QUESTION 19
Fred has been contracted as a penetration tester.
He will have access to the internal lines of code
and general design of an application that needs to
be tested. Fred always has had malicious intent.
Howard is testing the same software without any
prior knowledge. He will approach his duty as if
thinking like a malicious attacker. Howard is a
security professional.
A. Fred
B. Howard
C. Robin
D. Gary
Hint: The context of the question gives insight into the background and
the extent of each individual's knowledge.
Factors such as scope, level of access, and total knowledge of the system
determines the type of testing required. One type of test does not work
for every company and it is advised to use multiple types to get a holistic
view. Likewise, not all systems are alike and each one requires a different
testing tool.
Fred is performing white box testing. This kind of test provides him
detailed information on the internal workings of software and the lines
of code before any kind of test is even conducted6. White box testing
helps target a specific area of software vulnerabilities for a more
comprehensive result. The fact that Fred knows all about the software
before testing it, provides him the knowledge to perform penetration
tests from multiple known vectors. In other words, Fred does not have to
do any kind of reconnaissance on the target to find vulnerabilities. Out of
all the types of testing, white box testing provides the most cost-effective
technique7, however, someone having full knowledge before conducting
an external attack is not realistic of actual real-world threats. It takes
black box testing to understand all the possible and unseen ways an
adversary will try to compromise a system.
B. Howard
Howard is performing black box testing. Because he is approaching the
system with zero knowledge of how it works or functions, black box
testing can provide results most reflective of the real world11. The
insight gained from this type of test not only helps discover new threat
vectors, but also prioritize risks and remediate them in order of
importance. Howard is conducting black box testing in a professional
capacity. It should be cautioned that black box testing also gives Howard
the chance to inadvertently affect parts of the system beyond the scope
of the test. Without any prior knowledge of the internal workings of the
system, Howard also may fail to fully test the controls that actually need
to be tested12. If there was any damage, it would most likely come from
making mistakes or unintentionally affecting interdependent systems.
Either way, by giving permission to conduct black box security testing,
the organization has accepted the risk of potential damage.
C. Robin
Robin is performing gray box testing, which can be used to patch the
spots missed by both black and white box testing13. Gray box testing
makes up for the internal controls missed by black box testing and
provides an added element of realism missing in white box testing. Any
damage caused by Robin is either unintentional or done so in a
controlled manner. As an ethical hacker, Robin has already obtained
management's acceptance to expect this kind of damage.
D. Gary
Gary would cause the least amount of damage because SQL injections
performed on his database will never leave the confines of his lab.
A. Initiation
B. Development/Acquisition
C. Implementation/Assessment
D. Operations and Maintenance
Exam Essentials
Besides the SDLC, the initiation phase of any other process
should have security from the beginning. These include
BCP/DRP, PKI, IoT, mobile security, chain of custody, or
governance and compliance.
B. Development/Acquisition
Users and system experts work together in this stage to turn the initial
requirements into a maturely designed reality. If the project
requirements have changed, then security risks to the system should
continue to be assessed looking for unexpected weaknesses and threats.
Security controls are to be selected and documented as to where, when,
and how they will be applied to the architectural design of the system. It
is at this point when security has formally been applied to the system,
that complete consideration has been given to how it affects other
business and IT interdependencies12. This is the very definition of
implementing security early, not waiting until completion, but during
development. Software and hardware acceptance testing should then be
conducted to validate that the new system matches both functional and
security requirements. Complete documentation should accompany all
activities in this phase as well as all the other phases.
C. Implementation/Assessment
Utmost care must be practiced once the delivery, installation, or
deployment of the new system is established in a critical production
environment. The system must undergo a complete certification process
and the results sent to the system owner, developer, and other
stakeholders. Management will then provide accreditation, marking the
final risk decision on the new system as well as how it interacts with
other systems in operation13.
A. Data Classification
B. Access Control
C. Cryptography
D. Network Security
Hint: The correct choice is part of an overall life cycle that includes an
acquisition, usage, archival, and disposal stage3.
C. Cryptography (Domain 3)
A multitude of cryptographic controls exist from which to choose, each
one with its own price and complexity. Classification labels help to
narrow down the decision within budget and resources. For example,
classifications help to decide whether to use Perfect Forward Secrecy for
an IPSec VPN tunnel, or use the Diffie-Hellman key exchange in Phase 1.
It provides the criticality level of data at rest and in motion to determine
whether the company should buy Trusted Platform Modules or install
software-based encryption.
Because the CISSP exam involves high-level subject matter, the concepts
learned in each domain can be applied to a wide span of heterogeneous
industries and environments for their information security management.
Concepts do not change; they are high-level principles and can address
multiple types of enterprise requirements. The context of the question
does not matter, only that subjects need access to objects with a few
restrictions. It may take a single or hybrid combination of controls for
just the right type of access.
The humans would like the aliens to feel free to look around the
information system, which would serve as a gateway to learning about
mankind's entire existence. They want to be careful what they show
because this kind of knowledge will reveal human strengths and
weaknesses. Decisions must be made, such as would it be better to
blatantly restrict and confine the alien's access like in a MAC system? If
so, it may insult the aliens or show a lack of trust. How about customizing
access rights for each and every file in the database like in DAC? It would
certainly allow the beings to only view the files chosen by the human
data owners.
Information has value. This value determines who can have access to it.
Security professionals are not here to help users get access to valuable
information; they are here to protect information from unauthorized
access. Access control models are most effective when built into the
system so it serves as a technical preventative control as part of a
layered defense approach.
The most optimal access control model is one that does not expose any
information to extraneous entities1. The security professional must
consider capability, performance, cost, metrics, and the upkeep of an
access model2. Once implemented, it brings with it the complexities of
any new system. The impact of which can affect user productivity
throughout the enterprise or be isolated to a single operational
function3. Use policies, models, and security mechanisms when designing
the access control system.
QUESTION 22 - EXPLANATION
A. Mandatory Access Control
The MAC model is all about keeping secrets, but the humans want to
seem open in showing their history without looking too secretive. MAC is
the most restrictive form of access control as it significantly scales down
the amount of choices a user has when accessing information on an
operating system. A user may even know there are many other objects in
existence on the system, but they do not have access to anything outside
their boundaries. The MAC model is commonly used in government or
military environments where confidentiality is of the highest regard.
Mandatory access control is a nondiscretionary control as it has a
predetermined set of security labels that can only be accessed by those
who have the security clearance matching those labels4. The humans
would not use MAC at all because it is for highly secretive data, which is
not the type of information they are trying to present to the aliens in the
first place.
A. Defense-in-depth
B. Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design (CPTED)
C. Natural Access Control
D. Target Hardening
Hint: Look for the answer that may seem like an assortment of separate
controls, but at a high-level are meant to all work in concert with each
other.
CPTED makes it difficult for an attacker to get away with their actions
without being seen by creating an area of high public visibility. Natural
surveillance, territorial reinforcement, designated spaces, and scheduled
maintenance ensures a place where people practice awareness to
prevent crime and maintain security2. Is this what the corporation is
trying to do? Is CPTED an incomplete approach for the facility?
In order to protect all human life, critical assets, and remain profitable, a
business has to look at themselves from a holistic perspective, from a
high-level view. This means to have a strong physical perimeter (fences,
biometrics, motion detector, dogs), a network architecture based on a
sound security foundation (VPN, web application firewall, WPA2, fiber
optics) and a strong set of controls preventing direct access to the asset
(access control, encryption, antivirus). The idea being if one control fails
to protect the asset, there are multiple other controls that still need to be
overcome by an attacker6.
The correct choice will not only fix broken communication channels, but
also bring strategic and operational processes together. The solution will
make sure that if the exact same problem occurs again, it will be handled
more cohesively. Although it may take some time, money, and
considerable initial effort, the ultimate solution will actually create a
more organized business that can handle sudden changes with ease and
a proper governance structure.
Hint: Which choice will be able to align, enable, enhance, and increase
security effectiveness?
All the choices seem like they would work to help align IT with the
business. If this is true, then the "best" answer is the one that will have
the biggest and most long-term positive impact. Which one will not be
practiced in just a single silo, but every part of the enterprise? Which
choice would work to account for each issue in the question?
A. Change management
B. Regression testing
C. Threat modeling
D. Extreme Programming (XP)
It may first help to see which choice is about performing due care. Due
care means to direct prompt focus on the best thing to do for a certain
situation at that given moment. Which choice would have helped the
most to perform just before the new software was deployed? Which
choice may have detected the reason behind the server locking up?
Threat modeling can take two forms: one done during risk management
and one during software development. Both work to look for the number
of probable threats in correlation with existing vulnerabilities, instead of
the ones which are just possible3. Is this choice a due care measure and
could it have detected the software malfunction before it locked up the
server?
Hint: Are the choices in chronological order? Does one choice come first
then the other when it comes to making a software change?
QUESTION 25 - EXPLANATION
A. Change management
More changes are occurring within the enterprise now than any other
time in telecommunications5. Software updates, hotfixes, vulnerability
patches, upgrading old devices, failover testing, and firewall rules all
require a change management process. It is important to make sure
rapid technology changes do not wind up creating unexpected issues
once implemented. There must be a formal method to request, design,
approve, test, deploy, rollback, and document all changes. Integrity is the
primary goal of change management and it is achieved by having
multiple eyes verifying that information remains consistent before,
during, and after a new change6. This is not the correct answer because
deploying compression software that is "pending approval" insinuates
the developers have an existing change management process in place
already. There is a software release schedule to be followed, minimizing
ad hoc changes. Change management is a form of due diligence as it is a
long-term objective.
B. Regression testing
Regression testing is making sure new code does not alter software that
is already in place. Changes to software, however big or small, must be
tested before being put into a live enterprise. The idea is not only that
regression tests should be performed before making a change that may
or may not affect a system, but to just test the overall system once again
since initial deployment7. A single interactive acceptance test by humans
may not always root out flaws hidden deep within the lines of software
code8. Think of regression testing as not only to check the validation of
new code, but also a way to make sure previously corrected development
issues are not recurring. This is the correct choice because testing
something before deploying it is just a prudent thing to do, which is the
definition of due care. For software engineers, regression testing is to
make sure the software update is working properly. For managers, it's a
way to prevent a disruption to the performance of the business, which
could lead to increased cost and lowered productivity. For security
professionals, it is to make sure a new change does not inadvertently
open up new vulnerabilities or widen existing ones.
The other two types of testing are unit and integration. In unit testing a
single part of the overall software is tested, while integration testing
determines whether all the parts are able to work together per the
design. A combination of both these tests will provide an optimal degree
of confidence in the application's ability to reduce risk9. Please note:
software should never be tested in a production environment.
C. Threat modeling
The importance of this model is to take into consideration the reasonable
types of insider or outsider threats to the application whether in a
malicious capacity or in the form of a mistake. Then proceed to map how
these probable attacks can be realized with the existing or new
vulnerabilities in the software. Threat modeling is a type of due diligence
because of the amount of research put in beforehand and is most
effective during the design phase of software development11. Regression
testing is the more accurate answer.
D. Extreme Programming
There is a cute reason for the name of this programming model, it
consists of an extreme amount of teamwork. The engineers, senior
developers, team leads, managers, and the customers are considered
equals in a bid to turn out software as quick as possible12. Part of the
Agile methodology, XP brings people together without overburdening its
developers with a lot of processes to follow13. Unit testing may be used
in XP at a minimal level as only the minimal amount of code will be used
to pass the test. This process could have tested for server lock-ups before
deployment. XP provides software releases as fast as possible without a
set schedule, making this an incorrect choice. XP is also a software
development model that is not a form of due care.
WHY THE CISSP IS WORTH IT
If you want job security, the CISSP is worth it. If you want to spend
more time with your family, the CISSP is worth it. If you lose your job
and need to get another job fast before your mortgage is due, then the
CISSP is worth it. If you are 100% qualified for a high-paying job, but
one of the requirements is that you have a CISSP, you don't have to
worry about a missed opportunity because you didn't have
something. If you want to be part of a global community of security
professionals (okay maybe you don't need the CISSP for that, but it
helps!) the CISSP is worth it. There was so much I didn't know about
security before studying for the CISSP. While studying I learned about
polyinstantiation, referential integrity, known-plaintext attacks,
procedures, policies, ISO 27001, bollards, and one-time pads. I
learned the power of mathematics while studying about Diffie-
Hellman, the importance of encryption throughout history, the
meaning of data remanence, or the different types of fires and how to
best extinguish them. Studying for the CISSP, even if you don't pass,
helps you correlate the many facets of security and how they all
eventually relate to each other. If you want to stop yourself from
constantly needing motivation, but instead cultivate a sense of
discipline that will follow you for the rest of your life, the CISSP is
worth it.
Final Words From Luke
The journey to the CISSP, it’s an epic adventure. The harder you study,
the more you lessen the fear of failing. In the testing center, when the
timer begins to count down, there is nothing to focus on except the
computer terminal in front of you presenting deep-level security
questions. You take everything you learned in all those thousands of
pages of your study guides, all those hours of watching videos, all those
days of going over nothing but practice questions, and focus it all into the
glow of the monitor. The exam is so intense it is as if you took a breath,
and when you exhaled the exam was over; your fate is either a pass or a
fail. You have to push yourself to pass this thing, you have to want it
more than anything at this point of time in your life.
Imagine the exam ends and you walk toward the testing center proctor,
the longest walk you’ll ever take, and wait to hear the laboring engine of
the printer writing up the destiny of your information security career.
You’re either going to feel a crushing feeling of disappointment or a
warm moment of the impossible realization that you have passed.
Whatever the outcome, you’re still not the same person that you were
just a few hours, days, or months ago. You’ve improved. You have gained
a greater perception of information security concepts than ever before.
You can navigate your way around conversations with both technical
engineers and C-level executives. You see the reality that nothing is
perfect and you can’t eliminate every risk. Ultimately, it doesn’t really
matter if you pass or fail, the journey to the CISSP is the real prize.
By now I've spent over 2,000 nights grinding as a CISSP instructor.
Similar to your journey to the CISSP, mine has also been filled with
sleepless nights creating CISSP videos, practice questions, flashcards, and
managing multiple social media platforms. This whole security thing is
not a job, it's a commitment.
I am truly grateful for all those who have allowed me to be a part of their
CISSP journey. Your stories inspire me every day.
Question 2
1 “Primary: Definition of Primary by Lexico.” Lexico Dictionaries | English, Lexico Dictionaries.
Powered by Oxford., 2020, www.lexico.com/en/definition/primary.
2, 3 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security
Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
4 “ICGN Guidance on Corporate Risk Oversight.” ICGN International Corporate Governance
Network, ICGN International Corporate Governance Network, 2015, www.icgn.org/sites/default
/files/ICGN%20Corp%20Risk%20Oversightweb_0.pdf.
5, 6, 7, 8 “Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments - NIST.” National Institute of Standards and
Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Sept. 2012, nvlpubs.nist.gov
/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-30r1.pdf.
Question 3
1, 5, 6, 7 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016
2, 4, 8, 9, 10 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems
Security Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
3 McCormack, George. “Data Users.” Outcome 1: Describe the Legislation That Applies to the IT
Profession, Higher National Computing: E-Learning Materials, Mar. 2008, www.sqa.org.uk/e-
learning/ITLaw01CD/page_19.htm.
11 Sagan, Carl, 1934-1996. Carl Sagan's Cosmic Connection : an Extraterrestrial Perspective.
Cambridge ; New York :Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Question 4
1 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed. New
York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
2, 3, 4, 5, 6 NIST 800-15 Scarfone, Karen, et al. “Technical Guide to Information Security Testing
and Assessment.” National Institute of Standards and Technology, National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Sept. 2008, nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800
-115.pdf.
7 Eltringham, Scott. “Prosecuting Computer Crimes.” The United States Department of Justice,
Office of Legal Education Executive Office for United States Attorneys, 14 Jan. 2015, www.justice
.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-ccips/legacy/2015/01/14/ccmanual.pdf.
8 Daniel Regalado. Shon Harris. Allen Harper. Chris Eagle. Jonathan Ness. Branko Spasojevic. Ryan
Linn. Stephen Sims. Gray Hat Hacking The Ethical Hacker's Handbook, Fourth Edition. McGraw-
Hill/Osborne, 2015.
Question 5
1 Puttygen.com
2, 3, 4, 10 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
5, 6, 8, 9 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems
Security Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
7 “Guidelines on Firewalls and Firewall Policy.” Computer Security Resource Center, National
Institute of Standards and Technology, Sept. 2009, csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-41
/rev-1/final.
Question 6
1 “Code of Ethics: Complaint Procedures: Committee Members.” Code of Ethics | Complaint
Procedures | Committee Members, 2020, www.isc2.org/Ethics.
2, 3, Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed. New
York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
4, 8, 10 “Why Is Third Party Risk Management Important?” Third Party Risk Management
Managing Risks in Your Extended Enterprise, Deloitte, 2017, www2.deloitte.com/content/dam
/Deloitte/sg/Documents/risk/sg-risk-third-party-risk-management-brochure.pdf.
5, 7, 9 Gordon, Adam. Official (ISC)2 Guide to the CISSP CBK ((ISC)2 Press). 4th ed. Taylor and
Francis Group, LLC. 2015.
11 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security
Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
6 “CMMI Institute.” CMMI Institute - CMMI Levels of Capability and Performance, ISACA, 2020,
cmmiinstitute.com/learning/appraisals/levels.
Question 7
1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th
ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
2, 5 Blake, Sonya. “The Clark-Wilson Security Model.” Global Information Assurance Certification
Paper, Global Information Assurance Certification Paper, 17 May 2000, www.giac.org/paper/gsec
/835/clark-wilson-security-model/101747.
Question 8
5, 16, 17 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information
Systems Security Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
1, 2, 15 “DDoS Quick Guide.” National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center,
National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center, 29 Jan. 2014, www.us-cert.gov
/sites/default/files/publications/DDoS%20Quick%20Guide.pdf.
9 Specht, Stephen, and Ruby Lee. “Taxonomies of Distributed Denial of Service Networks, Attacks,
Tools, and Countermeasures.” Taxonomies of Distributed Denial of Service Networks, Attacks,
Tools, and Countermeasures, Princeton Architecture Laboratory for Multimedia and Security, 16
May 2003, www.princeton.edu/~rblee/ELE572Papers/Fall04Readings/DDoSSurveyPaper_
20030516_Final.pdf.
13 Real-world experience
Question 9
1 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed. New
York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
2 “Art. 50 GDPR - International Cooperation for the Protection of Personal Data.” GDPR.eu,
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), 14 Nov. 2018, gdpr.eu/article-50-countries-outside-
of-europe-cooperation/.
3 “Art. 17 GDPR - Right to Erasure ('Right to Be Forgotten').” GDPR.eu, General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR), 14 Nov. 2018, gdpr.eu/article-17-right-to-be-forgotten/.
4 “Art. 34 GDPR - Communication of a Personal Data Breach to the Data Subject.” GDPR.eu,
General Data Protection Regulation, 14 Nov. 2018, gdpr.eu/article-34-communication-of-a-
personal-data-breach/.
5, 9 “Tokenization Product Security Guidelines – Irreversible and Reversible Tokens.”
Tokenization Product Security Guidelines, PCI Security Standards Council, Apr. 2015, www.
pcisecuritystandards.org/documents/Tokenization_Product_Security_Guidelines.pdf.
6, “All You Need to Know about Tokenization.” All You Need to Know about Tokenization, VISA
Inc., usa.visa.com/dam/VCOM/download/security/documents/visa-security-tokenization-
infographic.pdf.
7, 10 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security
Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
8, 12 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed. New
York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
11 McCallister, Erika, et al. “Guide to Protecting the Confidentiality of Personally Identifiable
Information (PII).” Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology,
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Apr. 2010, nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP
/nistspecialpublication800-122.pdf.
Question 10
1 Mell, Peter, and Timothy Grance. “The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing.” Recommendations
of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, National Institute of Standards and
Technology, Sept. 2011, nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-145
.pdf.
2, 3, 4, 5 Jansen, Wayne, and Timothy Grance. “Guidelines on Security and Privacy in Public Cloud
Computing.” Guidelines on Security and Privacy in Public Cloud Computing, National Institute of
Standards and Technology, Dec. 2011, nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecial
publication800-144.pdf.
Question 11
1, 2, Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed. New
York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
3 Gordon, Adam. Official (ISC)2 Guide to the CISSP CBK ((ISC)2 Press). 4th ed. Taylor and Francis
Group, LLC. 2015.
4, 6, 7, 8 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems
Security Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
5 Swanson, Marianne, et al. “NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-18 Rev. 1, Guide for ...” Guide for
Developing Security Plans for Federal Information Systems, National Institute of Standards and
Technology, Feb. 2006, csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-18/rev-1/final.
Question 12
1 Hoffman, P., and B. Schneier. “Doc: RFC 4270: Attacks on Cryptographic Hashes in Internet
Protocols.” Attacks on Cryptographic Hashes in Internet Protocols, Network Working Group, Nov.
2005, www.hjp.at/doc/rfc/rfc4270.html.
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th
Edition. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
7 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security
Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
Question 13
1, 8 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security
Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
2, 3, 4, 6, 7 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
5 Swanson, Marianne, et al. “Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems .”
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-34, National Institute of
Standards and Technology, May 2010, nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecial
publication800-34r1.pdf.
Question 14
1, 2, 4, 5, 6 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems
Security Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
3 “Firewall Interfaces Overview.” Firewall Interfaces Overview, Palo Alto Networks, 30 Apr. 2020,
docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/8-1/pan-os-web-interface-help/network/network-
interfaces/firewall-interfaces-overview.
Question 15
1 “NIST Risk Management Framework Overview.” NIST Risk Management Framework Overview,
National Institute of Standards and Technology, 28 Mar. 2018, www.nist.gov/system/files
/documents/2018/03/28/vickie_nist_risk_management_framework_overview-hpc.pdf.
2 Xu, William; Grant, Gerald; Nguyen, Hai; and Dai, Xianyi (2008) "Security Breach: The Case of
TJX Companies, Inc.," Communications of the Association for Information Systems: Vol. 23, Article
31.
3 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security
Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
4, 5, 6 Gordon, Adam. Official (ISC)2 Guide to the CISSP CBK ((ISC)2 Press). 4th ed. Taylor and
Francis Group, LLC. 2015.
Question 16
7 Gordon, Adam. Official (ISC)2 Guide to the CISSP CBK ((ISC)2 Press). 4th ed. Taylor and Francis
Group, LLC. 2015.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th
ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
8 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security
Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
Question 17
1 2 3 5 6 9 10 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th
ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
4 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security
Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
7 8 Gordon, Adam. Official (ISC)2 Guide to the CISSP CBK ((ISC)2 Press). 4th ed. Taylor and
Francis Group, LLC. 2015.
Question 18
1, 2 Chew, Elizabeth, et al. “I N F O R M A T I O N S E C U R I T Y .” Performance Measurement
Guide for Information Security, National Institute of Standards and Technology, July 2008,
nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-55r1.pdf.
3 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security
Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
Question 19
1 2 7 8 Scarfone, Karen, et al. “Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment.”
Special Publication 800-115, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Sept. 2008, nvlpubs.
nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-115.pdf.
3 9 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security
Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
4 5 6 11 12 13 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th
ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
10 “Combating the Insider Threat.” National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration
Center, US Department of Homeland Security, 2 May 2014, www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files
/publications/Combating%20the%20Insider%20Threat_0.pdf.
Question 20
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 10 11 12 14 15Kissel, Richard, et al. “Security Considerations in the System
Development Life Cycle.” NIST Special Publication 800-64 Revision 2, National Institute of
Standards and Technology, Oct. 2008, nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecial
publication800-64r2.pdf.
9 13 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed. New
York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
6 https://cve.mitre.org/cve/
Question 21
1 2 3 4 5 6 8 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th
ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
7 “Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations.” NIST
Special Publication 800-53, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Apr. 2013, nvlpubs.
nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-53r4.pdf.
Question 22
1 2 3 7 Hu, Vincent, et al. “Assessment of Access Control Systems.” Assessment of Access Control
Systems, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Sept. 2006, nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs
/Legacy/IR/nistir7316.pdf.
4 11 12 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
5 6 “Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations.” NIST
Special Publication 800-53, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Apr. 2013, nvlpubs
.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-53r4.pdf.
8 9 10 Hu, Vincent C, et al. “Guide to Attribute Based Access Control (ABAC) Definition and
Considerations.” NIST Special Publication 800-162, National Institute of Standards and
Technology, Jan. 2014, nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/specialpublications/NIST.SP.800-162.pdf.
Question 23
1 5 8 Chapple, Mike, and James M Stewart. (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security
Professional Official Study Guide. 8th ed., Wiley, 2018.
2 10 11 12 Hoon, Tan. “CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN.” National
Crime Prevention Council, National Crime Prevention Council, Oct. 2003, rems.ed.gov/docs
/Mobile_docs/CPTED-Guidebook.pdf.
3 4 9 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed. New
York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
6 Barnum, Sean, et al. “Defense in Depth.” Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA,
United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team, 2005, www.us-cert.gov/bsi/articles
/knowledge/principles/defense-in-depth.
7 McGuiness, Todd. “Defense In Depth.” Information Security Reading Room, SANS Institute, 7
May 2020, www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/basics/defense-in-depth-525.
Question 24
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th
ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
Question 25
1 https://cmmiinstitute.com/learning/appraisals/levels
2 3 9 10 13 Harris, Shon. and Maymi, Fernando. CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, 7th Edition. 7th ed.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 2016.
4 12 extremeprogramming.org
5 6 11 Gordon, Adam. Official (ISC)2 Guide to the CISSP CBK ((ISC)2 Press). 4th ed. Taylor and
Francis Group, LLC. 2015.
7 8 Libes, Don. “Regression Testing and Conformance Testing Interactive Programs.” Testing
Interactive Programs, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 12 June 1992, tsapps.nist
.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=821305.
About the Author
Luke Ahmed is a CISSP instructor and the founder of Study Notes and
Theory. He provides a different way to study for the CISSP exam by
striving to come up with a casual and conducive learning environment
using a mix of high-level concepts and technical terminology. Luke is a
perpetual optimist dedicated to helping those on their journey to the
CISSP and becoming a better security professional.