Submission-Guidelines LIJDLR
Submission-Guidelines LIJDLR
com
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
• The Authors shall be completely liable for any dispute that arises out of my
or our manuscript, including copyright, defamation, offensive content, or
contempt, and they undertake to bear the loss (if any) that is caused by
breaching copyright or any other rights.
• On the first page of the manuscript, the author should include the title of the
paper, the names of the authors, and their affiliation with the respective
institutions, along with email ids, followed by an abstract and keywords. The
LIJDLR www.lijdlr.com
abstract needs to be clear and concise, while still conveying all the necessary
information.
• Footnotes should be written in Times New Roman style, font size 10, with
1.0 line spacing and the main body of the book should be written in Times
New Roman style, font size 12, with 1.5 line spacing. Each heading is
required to have a structure that is consistent throughout.
• There must be a standard citation style used throughout both the text and
the footnotes. Eg: Bluebook 20th Edition, OSCOLA.
• Microsoft Office word is the recommended file format for any articles (2003
or above). It is necessary to insert illustrations at the right points
throughout the paper. It's important to take care of the numbering. No
borders or other decorative implementations shall be entertained anywhere
in the entire text. The following sections must be included in the
manuscript:
i. Title page
ii. Abstract
iii. Keywords
iv. Introduction
v. Research & Analysis divided into various Sub-Headings
vi. Conclusion and Suggestions
vii. References
Head Notes
< Key Provisions > – < Issue in question of law > – < Material
facts which are directly related to the ratio decidendi in 2 to 3
phrases > – < The Ratio Decidendi beginning with the word ‘held
that’ > – < obitur dictum (if necessary)>
For example, in the case of MC Mehta v. Union of India 2 which was
concerned with the ‘Rule of Absolute Liability’ the head note may be as
follows:
Every reader has a purpose for research. The Head Note helps the reader to
have an overview of the case and to adjudge as to whether the instant case
analysis is relevant for his or her purpose of research. It is the only thing
that differentiates all the law journals and manuals like AIR (All India
Reporter), SCC (Supreme Court Cases), etc. The more comprehensive &
precise the Head Note, the more ease will be for the reader in doing legal
research.
Abstract
Primary Details of a case include the case number, jurisdiction (name of the
forum / Court / Tribunal and provision defining the jurisdiction), date of
pronouncement of judgment, Name of the Judges, Legal Provisions
Involved, and name of the person who has prepared the case analysis, and
other case-specific particulars, for example,
a. if the case is concerned with a Writ Petition then the size and type of
the Bench (division bench, social bench, or single bench) are to be
included; or
b. if the case is a Criminal Writ Petition then the name of the
Prosecution Witnesses & Defence Witnesses are to be included under
a separate sub-heading; etc.
General Details
Specific Details
P.W. 1 A D.W. 1 B
{Note: All the categories of general and specific details are not covered in the
aforementioned example. The analyst has to mention every preliminary detail of the
case.}
c) Procedural Background
All the material facts of the case should be elucidated in brief in ‘Factual
Background’. The major issue which arises here is related to the identification
of ‘material facts. Now, for determining as to which fact is material and
which is not we use Goodhart’s Rule of Determining the Ratio which was
published in the Yale Law Journal. Identification of the material facts not
only helps in differentiating between the ratio decidendi and the obiter dictum
but it also helps in culling out the major legal arguments and in knowing
what part of judgment must be mentioned and what not. The rule is further
elucidated in Chapter – VI. Whereas, in the procedural background the series
of events related to the Court Procedure or lex fora must be elucidated
chronologically.
Issues
Generally, the judgment is per se explicit on the issues dealt with in the case
but if the judgment has dealt with the issues ‘simultaneously’ and not
‘subsequently’ then all the issues about the questions of law shall be included
in the case analysis. Questions of fact may be avoided if not crucial for
determining the ratio decidendi.
Provisions involved
All the statutes and provisions which are involved in the case must be
elucidated in the case analysis to make it easy for the reader to understand
the use of those provisions. Provisions not only include the Statutes but also
other components of the ‘Rule of Law’. The ‘Rule of Law’ included, inter
alia, the following:
a) Statutory Provisions;
b) Decided Judicial Precedents (which are not overruled or surpassed);
c) Jurisprudential Principles;
d) International Law Principles;
e) Principles of Common Law; or
f) And any other legal principle used in the judgment.
LIJDLR www.lijdlr.com
Party’s Arguments
Judgement
A judgment has various parts including, inter alia, the ratio decidendi, and the
obiter dictum. This heading must thus be classified into two parts, i.e., the
Ratio Decidendi and the Obiter Dictum. The analysis of the Court on each
issue must be explicated under separate sub-headings. Further, there must
be a clear distinction between the ratio and dicta by making use of Goodhart’s
Rule which is explained further in detail in Chapter – IV.
Commentary
4 https://www.yorku.ca/khoosh/PPAS%202200/case_commentary.htm
LIJDLR www.lijdlr.com
will almost invariably include a brief chronicle of how the court has decided
on similar cases. The point of supplying such a legal context is to help
determine not only what the law has been in a certain area but also the
extent to which the subject case affirms or departs from a line of precedents.
In short, a legal history helps highlight why the chosen case is important.5
“How does one determine the legal history of a particular subject matter that
has come before the courts? To begin with, the Judgment you are examining
invariably will contain a list of cases that the Court considered when
reaching its decision in the present case. These cases are in one way or
another relevant precedents so you can quickly look at them to see what
courts have decided in the past in this particular area of the law. Two general
texts on Canadian constitutional law that help point out how courts have
decided broad areas of the law are.6”
Describing the details of a case and its legal context does not exhaust the
requirements of an effective case comment cases have not only legal but
social and political significance. In other words, court rulings often have
weighty social and political consequences, indeed, may not be understood
outside the social and political environment that gave rise to them. Hence
in most instances, a successful case comment will draw on a wider political
and social context to better explain and analyze a specific ruling. Such a
wider context may help illuminate where, why, and how certain legal
controversies arise. The broader social and political context may be key to
identifying why a case is important enough to warrant an extended
commentary.7 One thing which must be noted is that the comment must be
fair i.e. based on facts and appropriate reasoning & must be bonafide to avoid
contempt of court.
5 Id.
6 Id.
7 Id.
LIJDLR www.lijdlr.com
{Note: An analyst may include the cases overruled by the instant case and the
cases which overruled the instant judgment and the rationale behind such
judgment.}
1. Your case note must be concise, clear, useful, and relevant. This increases
the readability of the work. The more readable is the work, the easy it is for
the reader to ascertain your opinion.
2. However, to make it more effective, you should try to inculcate the essential
elements in it, and eliminate the non-essential things which simply reduce
your efficiency. An effective case note should have the following:9 (1) When
did the cause of action arise? (2) When the complaint was registered? (3)
What legal issues were involved? and (4) What statutory provisions were
used in declaring the verdict?