Reply of Bail Cancel

IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF ADDI.
DISTRICT &
SESSION JUDGE -07 ALIGARH U.P.
IN THE MATTER OF:
STATE VS. ARJUN SINGH & OTR.
FIR NO. 212/2021

U/S: 147/323/325/504/506 IPC
2A/3A MP ACT
P.S.: QUARSI
REPLY TO THE APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF

BAIL OF ARJUN SINGH , DEEPAK , SUMIT AND AMIT.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS:
1. That the present application is not
maintainable as at the time of granting
regular bail on 02.03.2021, no specific
conditions were imposed upon the accused
and as such, there is no violation of
such condition. It is submitted that
even the complainant has not
reported/disclosed any such condition in
the instant entire application.
maintainable as the complainant has
concealed the material facts.

2
maintainable.
maintainable as the accused/applicant is
neither allegedly tempering with the
evidence nor he is not available for the
trial, which is envisaged in another
judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court titled as
“Bhagirath Singh Vs. State of Gujarat”
1984(1) Crimes 334.
maintainable as the matter section 2A of
medical prevention act of definition of
commit the offence and 3A section of
medical prevention act is commit the
offence shall be punished with the
punishment for a term which may extend
to tree year or with the fine.
REPLY ON MERITS:
1. That para No.1 of the application needs
no reply.
3
2. That para No.2 of the application is
wrong and denied.
partly admitted to the extent that the
applicant/ accused was granted interim
bail on 02.03.2021, but subsequently he
was granted regular bail and no specific
terms and conditions were imposed upon
him and so violation of such condition
is not alleged in the application. It is
submitted that the matter is pending
before the trial court and listed for
the 03.11.2023 on charge. It is
pertinent to mention here at the time of
bail application section 2A of medical
prevention act in FIR when argument on
bail application section 2A of medical
prevention act is the definition of the
commit offence and section 3A of medical
prevention act 2013 is punishment of
alleged offence. Charge sheet has been
filed before the concern court and IO
has been added section 2A/3A of medical
prevention act in the final report.

4
wrong and denied. It is denied that the
accused person grant the bail without
the consider the prosecution facts .it
is pertinent to mention here that on
bail order clear mention that object the
bail application by the prosecutor. And
concern court consider the all facts and
given the proper opportunity of the
both the parties and grant the bail of
the accused person and mention that the
committed offence is less then 7 year of
punishment.
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that
the application be dismissed with cost, in the
interest of justice.
ACCUSED
ALIGARH.
DATED: THROUGH
COUNSEL
5
IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF ADDI. DISTRICT &

IN THE MATTER OF:
FIR NO. 212/2021

U/S: 147/323/325/504/506 IPC
2A/3A MP ACT
P.S.: QUARSI
AFFIDAVIT
I Arjun singh s/o Ram lal R/o village –

ushmanpur khurja nagar , Distt- bulandshar,
U.P. do hereby solemnly affirm and declare
under:-
1.That I am residing above given address.
2.That I am deponent in the above affidavit
and being well conversant with the fact
and circumstance of the affidavit/case and
competent to swear to present affidavit.
3.That the content of said bail application
are not repeated herein for the save
brevity, however the maybe read as part
and this affidavit.
4.That my statement is true and correct.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified at Aligarh on ____ day of oct
2023 that the contents of above said affidavit
are true and correct to my knowledge and on the
basis of knowledge received from lawyer and
believed to be correct and nothing is false and
nothing has been concealed from the court.
DEPONENT
6

IN THE MATTER OF:
FIR NO. 212/2021

U/S: 147/323/325/504/506 IPC
2A/3A MP ACT
P.S.: QUARSI
AFFIDAVIT
I deepak s/o satish chand R/o village –

ushmanpur khurja nagar , Distt- bulandshar,
U.P. do hereby solemnly affirm and declare
under:-
and this affidavit.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
7

IN THE MATTER OF:
FIR NO. 212/2021

U/S: 147/323/325/504/506 IPC
2A/3A MP ACT
P.S.: QUARSI
AFFIDAVIT
I sumit s/o suresh chand R/o village -karsua

PO-karsua PS -Lodha, Distt-Aligarh, U.P. 202140
do hereby solemnly affirm and declare under:-
and this affidavit.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
8

IN THE MATTER OF:
FIR NO. 212/2021

U/S: 147/323/325/504/506 IPC
2A/3A MP ACT
P.S.: QUARSI
AFFIDAVIT
I amit s/o jogendra R/o village -karsua PO-

karsua PS -Lodha, Distt-Aligarh, U.P. 202140 do
hereby solemnly affirm and declare under:-
and this affidavit.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
9

Reply of Bail Cancel

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reply of Bail Cancel

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF ADDI.

IN THE MATTER OF:

STATE VS. ARJUN SINGH & OTR.

FIR NO. 212/2021

REPLY TO THE APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the present application is not

maintainable as at the time of granting

regular bail on 02.03.2021, no specific

conditions were imposed upon the accused

and as such, there is no violation of

such condition. It is submitted that

even the complainant has not

reported/disclosed any such condition in

the instant entire application.

2. That the present application is not

maintainable as the complainant has

concealed the material facts.

3. That the present application is not

4. That the present application is not

maintainable as the accused/applicant is

neither allegedly tempering with the

evidence nor he is not available for the

trial, which is envisaged in another

judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court titled as

“Bhagirath Singh Vs. State of Gujarat”

1984(1) Crimes 334.

5. That the present application is not

maintainable as the matter section 2A of

medical prevention act of definition of

commit the offence and 3A section of

medical prevention act is commit the

offence shall be punished with the

punishment for a term which may extend

to tree year or with the fine.

1. That para No.1 of the application needs

2. That para No.2 of the application is

wrong and denied.

3. That para No.3 of the application is

partly admitted to the extent that the

applicant/ accused was granted interim

bail on 02.03.2021, but subsequently he

was granted regular bail and no specific

terms and conditions were imposed upon

him and so violation of such condition

is not alleged in the application. It is

submitted that the matter is pending

before the trial court and listed for

the 03.11.2023 on charge. It is

pertinent to mention here at the time of

bail application section 2A of medical

prevention act in FIR when argument on

bail application section 2A of medical

prevention act is the definition of the

commit offence and section 3A of medical

prevention act 2013 is punishment of

alleged offence. Charge sheet has been

filed before the concern court and IO

has been added section 2A/3A of medical

prevention act in the final report.

4. That para No.4 of the application is

wrong and denied. It is denied that the