ADJU 201 Chapter 3 Lecture
ADJU 201 Chapter 3 Lecture
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, students should be able to
• Summarize the development of criminological theory, including the role of social research in that
development.
• Describe the Classical School of criminology, and show how it continues to influence criminological
theorizing.
• Describe the basic features of biological theories of crime causation and their shortcomings.
• Explain how the mapping of human DNA has enhanced contemporary psychobiological
understandings of criminal behavior.
• Describe the fundamental assumptions of psychological explanations for crime and their
shortcomings.
• Describe the basic features of sociological theories of crime causation.
• Describe social process theories of criminology, including the kinds of crime-control policies that
might be based on them.
• Describe conflict theories of criminality, including the kinds of crime-control policies that might be
based on them.
• Summarize three emergent theories of crime causation.
Chapter Overview
Chapter 3 provides an overview of theories used to explain the causes of crime. It begins with an introduction
to theory building in criminal justice, emphasizing the importance of research for testing hypotheses. The
chapter is organized into eight general categories, and Table 3-1 is an extraordinarily useful tool for its
summary of the characteristics of these theories and of the people most noted for their development.
Chapter 3 first discusses the criminological theories of the Classical School, including the works of
Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham. The text discusses the five basic assumptions of classical theory:
1. Crime is caused by the individual exercise of free will.
2. Pain and pleasure are the two central determinants of human behavior.
3. Crime disparages the quality of the bond that exists between individuals and society.
4. Punishment is necessary to deter violators of the law and to serve as an example to others.
5. Crime prevention is possible through swift and certain punishment.
Theories in the Biological School search for physical or biological explanations of
crime. Influenced by medical and technological advances, these theories have evolved over time. Compare the
early biological theories of Gall, Lombroso, and Sheldon to contemporary biochemical theories. Gall argued that
skull shape determined personality and behavior. Lombroso considered various parts of the body in his
atavistic explanation for crime. Criminals, he argued, were throwbacks to earlier stages of evolution. William
Sheldon used somatotyping (or body typing) to categorize each individual’s physique by its mesomorphic,
endomorphic, and ectomorphic characteristics. Sheldon found that juveniles with dominant mesomorphic
physiques were most likely to commit crime. Richard Dugdale has considered biological inheritance as applied
to criminal families in his examination of the Jukes’ family tree and Henry Goddard’s study of the Kallikaks.
Biological theories have advanced with medical technology. For example, chromosome theories look to
internal gene structure to understand the causes of crime. The XYY chromosome theory was popular in the
1960s and early 1970s, but later studies question the ability of the XYY theory to predict criminal behavior.
Other biological theories have examined the effects of chemical imbalances, hormones, and allergic reactions
to food on criminal behavior.
Psychological explanations argue that criminal behavior results from inappropriately conditioned
behavior or from abnormal, dysfunctional, and inappropriate mental processes. One thread of psychological
theories presented in the text is behavioral conditioning. Another thread focuses on personality
disturbances and diseases of the mind. People who believe in conditioning hold that the frequency of any
behavior can be increased through rewards, punishments, and/or association with other stimuli. Sigmund
Freud argued that personality was developed from the interaction of the id, the ego, and the superego. One
source of criminal behavior is the ability of a person’s superego to control his or her id.
Sociological explanations of crime examine the effects on behavior of environmental forces such as
poverty, urban decay, and unemployment. For example, Shaw and McKay’s social ecology theory argues that
certain areas of a city—those with high rates of poverty, unemployment, and lack of schooling—are socially
disorganized and likely to produce crime. Merton, borrowing the concept of anomie from Émile Durkheim,
argued that since the means to achieve goals are not equally available to all groups, individuals are forced to use
illegitimate means such as crime to accomplish goals. On the other hand, subcultural theories argue that the
goals of various groups are different and some groups view committing crime as a legitimate goal. For example,
Marvin Wolfgang and Franco Ferracuti found that murder was an acceptable goal for certain groups.
Chapter 3 also discusses social process theories, conflict theories, and some emerging theories such as
feminist criminology. Social process theories explain deviant behavior by highlighting the process of
interaction between individuals and society. Conflict theories consider law a tool of the powerful, which is
used by the powerful to further their own interests. Feminist criminology emphasizes gender issues in
criminology. None of these theories provide a definitive explanation of why people commit crimes. However,
understanding how these theories explain the causes of crime is important because they have an impact on
the development of criminal justice policy and the criminal justice system’s response to crime.
Outline
I. Introduction
• Define deviance, and explain the difference between criminal and deviant behavior.
Deviance A violation of social norms defining appropriate or proper behavior under a particular set of
circumstances. Deviance often includes criminal acts.
X. Emergent Perspectives
A. Feminist Criminology
Feminist Criminology A developing intellectual approach that emphasizes gender issues in criminology.
B. Constitutive Criminology
Constitutive Criminology The study of the process by which human beings create an ideology of crime
that sustains the notion of crime as a concrete reality.
C. Postmodern Criminology
Postmodern Criminology A branch of criminology that developed following World War II and that
builds on the tenets of postmodern social thought.
Deconstructionist Theories One of the emerging approaches that challenges existing criminological
perspectives to debunk them and that works toward replacing them with concepts more applicable to the
postmodern era.