Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essentials of Sociology
Essentials of Sociology
Essentials of Sociology
Essentials
of Sociology
Recent Sociology Titles from
W. W. Norton
Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions by Myra Marx Ferree and Lisa Wade
The Real World: An Introduction to Sociology, Fifth Edition by Kerry Ferris and
Jill Stein
Mix It Up: Popular Culture, Mass Media, and Society, Second Edition
by David Grazian
Families as They Really Are, Second Edition edited by Barbara J. Risman and
Virginia E. Rutter
Sex Matters: The Sexuality and Society Reader, Fourth Edition edited by
Mindy Stombler, Dawn M. Baunach, Wendy O. Simonds, Elroi J. Windsor, and
Elisabeth O. Burgess
American Society: How It Really Works, Second Edition by Erik Olin Wright and
Joel Rogers
Essentials
of Sociology
Anthony Giddens
London School of Economics
Mitchell Duneier
City University of New York Graduate Center
Princeton University
Richard P. Appelbaum
University of California, Santa Barbara
Deborah Carr
Rutgers University
Copyright © 2017, 2015, 2013, 2011, 2008 by Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier,
Richard P. Appelbaum, and Deborah Carr
Copyright © 2006 by Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier, and Richard P. Appelbaum
W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10110
wwnorton.com
W. W. Norton & Company Ltd., 15 Carlisle Street, London W1D 3BS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
Contents
PREFACE xix
Contents v
5. Carry Out the Research 25
6. Interpret the Results 25
7. Report the Findings 26
vi Contents
Globalization by the Numbers: Internet Connectivity 67
Globalization and Local Cultures 68
The Big Picture 70
Contents vii
HOW DO WE MANAGE IMPRESSIONS IN DAILY LIFE? 109
Impression Management 109
Focused and Unfocused Interaction 109
Audience Segregation 111
viii Contents
Technology and Modern Organizations 146
The “McDonaldization” of Society 148
Contents ix
Chapter 7: Stratification, Class, 190
and Inequality
WHAT IS SOCIAL STRATIFICATION? 193
Slavery 193
Caste Systems 194
Class 195
Theories of Stratification in Modern Societies 196
Digital Life: Does the Digital Divide Still Matter? 197
x Contents
Digital Life: Can Apps Heal Global Inequalities? 233
Hunger and Malnutrition 234
Education and Literacy 235
Child Labor 235
Contents xi
WHAT ARE THE GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES 278
OF GENDER INEQUALITY?
How Gender Inequality Affects Our Lives 279
The Big Picture 280
xii Contents
HOW DO SOCIOLOGICAL THEORIES 320
CHARACTERIZE FAMILIES?
Functionalism 320
Feminist Approaches 321
New Perspectives in the Sociology of Families 323
Contents xiii
The Social Reproduction of Inequality 363
Intelligence and Inequality 364
Educational Reform in the United States 365
xiv Contents
WHAT ARE KEY ELEMENTS OF THE MODERN ECONOMY? 411
Corporations and Corporate Power 411
Contents xv
Sexual Orientation 449
How Does the Social Context of Bodies, Sexuality, and Health 453
Affect Your Life?
The Big Picture 454
x vi Contents
Chapter 16: Globalization in a 494
Changing World
HOW DOES GLOBALIZATION AFFECT SOCIAL CHANGE? 497
The Physical Environment 498
Political Organization 499
Culture 500
Economic Factors 501
GLOSSARY A1
BIBLIOGRAPHY A11
CREDITS A41
INDEX A43
INDEX OF INFOGRAPHICS A60
Contents x vii
Preface
We believe that sociology plays an essential role in modern intellectual culture
and occupies a central place within the social sciences. We have aimed to write
a book that merges classic sociological theories with up-to-the-minute social
issues that interest sociologists today. We also believe that sociologists must
use rigorous research methods in order to study and understand human behavior. We
highlight findings from ethnographic studies to document the hows and whys of social
behavior, and also present current statistical data to document important social trends.
We aim to present material in a “fair and balanced” way. Although each of the authors has
his or her own perspective on social theories, methods, and social policy, we have worked
hard to ensure that our treatment is unbiased and non-partisan. We strive to present the
most complete picture of sociology possible. Given the vast array of topics encompassed
by sociology, however, we made difficult choices about what the most essential topics in
sociology are today. We hope readers are engaged, intrigued, and occasionally inspired by
the ideas presented in this book.
Major Themes
The book is constructed around four basic themes that provide its character. The
newest theme is applying sociology to everyday life. Sociological thinking enables
self-understanding, which in turn can be focused back on an improved understanding of
Preface xix
the social world. Studying sociology can be a liberating experience: It expands our sympa-
thies and imagination, opens up new perspectives on the sources of our own behavior,
and creates an awareness of cultural settings different from our own. Sociological ideas
challenge dogma, teach appreciation of cultural variety, and allow us insight into the
working of social institutions. At a more practical level, the text shows how technology
affects our daily experiences (new “Digital Life” sections) and how countries across the
globe compare on key metrics such as incarceration rate, maternity leave benefits, and
gender inequality (full-page “Globalization by the Numbers” infographics).
Our second theme is inequalities. Throughout the text, we highlight that import-
ant resources—whether education, health, income, or social support—are not fairly or
evenly distributed to all individuals. We highlight the ways that gender, race, social class,
and age shape our daily lives in the United States. We also pay keen attention to global
inequalities, and reveal how differences in economic and natural resources throughout
the world powerfully influence even very personal experiences—including health, reli-
gion, and relationships.
A third theme of the book is that of social and historical context. Sociology was
born of the transformations that wrenched the industrializing social order of the
West away from the lifestyles characteristic of earlier societies. The pace of social change
has continued to accelerate, and it is possible that we now stand on the threshold of
transitions as significant as those that occurred in the late eighteenth and nineteenth
centuries. Sociology has the prime responsibility for charting the transformations of
our past and for grasping the major lines of development taking place today. Our under-
standing of the past also contributes to our understanding of institutions in the present
and future.
The fourth fundamental theme of the book is globalization. For far too long, sociology
has been dominated by the view that societies can be studied as independent entities.
But even in the past, societies never really existed in isolation. Today we can see a clear
acceleration in processes of global integration. This is obvious, for example, in the expan-
sion of international trade across the world. The emphasis on globalization also connects
closely with the weight given to the interdependence of the industrialized and develop-
ing worlds today.
Despite these interconnections, however, societies have their own distinctive attri-
butes, traditions, and experiences. Sociology cannot be taught solely by understanding the
institutions of any one particular society. While we have slanted our discussion toward the
United States, we have also balanced it with a rich variety of materials drawn from other
regions—especially those undergoing rapid social change, such as the Middle East, Asia,
Africa, and Eastern Europe. The book also includes much more material on developing
countries than has been usual in introductory texts.
All of the chapters in the book have been updated and revised to reflect the most recent
available data. Each chapter opens with a contemporary news event or social trend—
ranging from the most local and seemingly trivial (like an email from Yale University
administrators about Halloween costumes) to the most global and profound (such as the
catastrophic earthquakes in Haiti and Japan). These events are used to motivate and explain
the key sociological concepts, themes, and studies that are elaborated throughout the text.
Other substantive changes include:
xx Preface
Chapter 1 Sociology: Theory and Method
The chapter opener has been updated with more current data on cyberbullying and also
includes the findings of a new school climate study focused on the experiences of LGBT
students. The Digital Life box, “Bullying Goes Viral,” has been reworked to reflect the
recent use of anonymous messenger apps like Yik Yak as a medium for cyberbullying,
highlighting the controversies the app has caused on multiple college campuses. The
chapter also features a new discussion of the work of Herbert Spencer. The discussion of
conflict theories in sociology has been expanded. A new full-page Globalization by the
Numbers infographic, titled “Opinion of the United States,” captures the considerable
differences among nations in the proportion of the population that holds favorable atti-
tudes toward the United States—and how these attitudes have changed over time. This
data is also now presented in a new table.
Chapter 4 Social Interaction and Everyday Life in the Age of the Internet
A new discussion of Internet “trolling” has been added in the section on interactional van-
dalism. The section on race in the public sphere has been expanded with a new discussion
Preface x xi
of Elijah Anderson’s recent work The Cosmopolitan Canopy. A new Digital Life box, titled
“Turning Away from Face-to-face Interaction,” explores how technology is changing the
nature of face-to-face communication by making it possible to hold simultaneous conver-
sations online and in real life. The box draws on a 2015 Pew Research Center study on how
often people use their phones during social activities as well as MIT researcher Sherry
Turkle’s recent work on how smartphone usage has detrimental effects on our ability to
experience empathy. A new full-page Globalization by the Numbers infographic compares
the rates of smartphone ownership in different countries across the globe to provide a
picture of this new digital divide. The section on women and men in public now includes a
discussion of a recent video demonstration conducted on the streets of New York City that
brought attention to the issue of street harassment.
x xii Preface
distribution, mean household income by income group and race, and racial disparities in
wealth have all been updated. The discussion of poverty in the United States has been
updated with more current statistics, including poverty rates by age and race. The figure on
the relative social prestige of U.S. occupations has been updated. The new edition explores
how the 2008 recession and slow economic recovery have affected Americans’ perceptions
of whether they consider themselves to be middle class or lower class, whether poverty
is a result of circumstances beyond one’s control or the fault of individuals, and feelings
regarding the U.S. economic climate. A new Digital Life box, titled “Does the Digital Divide
Still Matter?” provides an up-to-date look at the state of the digital divide in 2015. The box
looks at gaps in smartphone ownership and highlights a new Pew Research Center report
on how people of varying socioeconomic backgrounds use technology to search and apply
for jobs. The full-page Globalization by the Numbers infographic on income inequality now
reflects the most recent data. The discussion of homelessness has been updated with more
current statistics, including the number of homeless, the demographic breakdown of the
homeless population, and the proportion of renters who spend more than 30 percent of
their income on rent.
Preface x xiii
participation, representation in government, and participation in secondary school. A new
section on gender inequalities in entrepreneurship provides statistics on women-owned
business firms and discusses Sarah Thébaud’s 2015 experimental research on perceptions
of female business owners. Global data on women’s labor force participation have been
updated. The section on balancing work and child care now includes the term motherhood
penalty, introduces the topic of public policies that can be effective in counteracting employ-
ers’ stereotypical views of mothers in the workplace, and references Michelle Budig’s 2012
cross-cultural study of public attitudes toward working mothers in twenty-two countries.
The section on housework and the second shift now includes a discussion of a 2015 study of
young adults and how they would like to share earning and household/caregiving respon-
sibilities as well as a 2015 study on how same-sex couples share household responsibilities.
The data in the section on gender inequality in politics have been updated. Data on intimate
partner violence have been updated. The section on rape now discusses recent protests
against sexual assault on college campuses, highlighting Emma Sulkowicz’s 2015 protest at
Columbia University. A new “Theories of Intersectionality” section includes a discussion of
transnational feminism, which has been added as a key term.
x xiv Preface
families and the rise of single-person households. The discussion of divorce has been
reworked and now includes coverage of recent research. The section on child abuse has
been updated with more current research. The section on intimate partner violence now
includes a discussion of the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey. The
discussion of cohabitation now includes coverage of research into men’s and women’s
differing reasons for cohabitating as well as cohabitation as a “stage in the process.” The
section on same-sex-parent families has been updated with the most recent data and
now introduces the terms second-parent adoption and joint adoption. The discussion of
same-sex-parent families now discusses the controversial Regnerus study of children of
same-sex parents. The Globalization by the Numbers infographic for this chapter, titled
“Maternity Leave,” has been updated with new data on countries’ current leave policies.
The Digital Life box, titled “Dating and Mating Online,” has been updated with references
to new dating apps and now discusses Kevin Lewis’s research on the preferences of dat-
ing site users.
Preface xxv
on where Americans receive their news have been updated. In the section on voting, the
authors have added more current data on party identification. The discussion of interest
groups now highlights a statistical analysis of nearly 1,800 policy issues and the role of
money in politics. Data on incumbents was updated to consider the 2014 elections, and
data on women’s participation in politics were updated. The discussion of military spend-
ing, as well as the accompanying figure, were updated with 2015 data. A new discussion
of terrorism considers ISIS and Boko Haram as well as hate groups in the United States.
The section on labor unions includes updated statistics on labor union membership and
public opinion of unions as well as a new discussion of why labor unions have confronted
difficulties in the past few decades. The figure showing work stoppages has been updated.
The coverage of types of corporate capitalism now features a new discussion of global
capitalism, whereby giant transnational entities are becoming increasingly stateless. The
new Digital Life box, titled “Will a Robot Take Your Job?” looks at how American com-
panies are employing fewer workers thanks to advances in technology and how rapid
advances in software hold the promise of automating occupations that currently require
college degrees. It also discusses strides in additive manufacturing, or 3D printing. Data
on unemployment, as well as the number of people who have given up looking for work,
have been updated.
x x vi Preface
urbanization have been updated and the discussion of the environmental challenges of
urbanization now considers climate-related problems in Pakistan, including the country’s
water woes. The discussion of possible consequences of demographic changes has been
expanded to include a discussion of widespread migration, referencing the Syrian civil
war and Syrian refugee crisis. A new table detailing the five countries with the oldest and
youngest populations in 2015 has been added. Data on birth rates, death rates, and infant
mortality rates across the globe have been updated. The global map detailing population
growth rates around the world has been updated with new data, and a new figure on the
demographic transition has been added. The section on the demographic transition now
includes a discussion of what the United Nations have deemed the “least developed coun-
tries.” The discussion of global warming and climate change now includes a comparison
of China and the United States, summaries of recent IPCC reports on global warming,
and a discussion of the 2015 Paris agreement. A new section, titled “A New Ecological
Paradigm?” has been added that details the historical treatment of environmental issues
within the field of sociology, introducing the terms human exceptionalism paradigm, new
ecological paradigm and Anthropocene. The new Digital Life box, titled “Tracking Your
Ecological Footprint,” encourages readers to think critically about their current energy
consumption and to visit a site whereby they can learn how many Earths would be
required if every person were to achieve that same lifestyle.
Organization
There is very little abstract discussion of basic sociological concepts at the beginning of
this book. Instead, concepts are explained when they are introduced in the relevant chap-
ters, and we have sought throughout to illustrate them by means of concrete examples.
Preface x x vii
While these are usually taken from sociological research, we have also used material from
other sources (such as newspaper or popular magazine articles). We have tried to keep the
writing style as simple and direct as possible, while endeavoring to make the book lively
and full of surprises.
The chapters follow a sequence designed to help achieve a progressive mastery of the
different fields of sociology, but we have taken care to ensure that the book can be used
flexibly and is easy to adapt to the needs of individual courses. Chapters can be skipped or
studied in a different order without much loss. Each has been written as a fairly autono-
mous unit, with cross-referencing to other chapters at relevant points.
Study Aids
Every chapter in the Sixth Edition of Essentials of Sociology features:
■■ “Digital Life” boxesin every chapter get students thinking critically about how
the Internet and smartphones are transforming the way we date, manage our
health, and even practice religion.
■■ “Big Picture” Concept Mapsat the end of every chapter, which integrate the
“Big Questions,” key terms, and “Concept Checks” into a handy and visually
interesting study tool, serve as both a pre-reading guide to the chapter as well as
a post-reading review.
■■ Learning Goalsare outlined at the start of the chapter and then recur throughout
the chapter in marginal notations at the beginning of the relevant sections to
promote active learning.
Acknowledgments
Many individuals offered us helpful comments and advice on particular chapters, and, in
some cases, large parts of the text. They helped us see issues in a different light, clarified
some difficult points, and allowed us to take advantage of their specialist knowledge in
their respective fields. We are deeply indebted to them. Special thanks go to Jason Phillips,
who worked assiduously to help us update data in all chapters and contributed significantly
to editing as well; and Dmitry Khodyakov, who wrote thought-provoking Concept Check
questions for each chapter.
We would like to thank the many readers of the text who have written us with
comments, criticisms, and suggestions for improvements. We have adopted many of
their recommendations in this new edition.
x x viii Preface
Adalberto Aguirre, University of California, Kalyna Lesyna, Palomar College
Riverside Danilo Levi, Delgado Community College
Colleen Avedikian, University of Ke Liang, Baruch College
Massachusetts Dartmouth
Devin Molina, Bronx Community College
Debbie Bishop, Lansing Community College
Jayne Mooney, John Jay College of Criminal
Kim Brackett, Auburn University Justice
Joy Branch, Southern Union State Community Kendra Murphy, University of Memphis
College
Rafael Narvaez, Winona State University
Edith Brotman, Towson University
Takamitsu Ono, Anne Arundel Community
Tucker Brown, Austin Peay State University College
Susan Cody-Rydzewski, Georgia Perimeter Carolyn Pevey, Germanna Community College
College
Robert Pullen, Troy University
Caroline Calogero, Brookdale Community
Matt Reynolds, College of Southern Idaho
College
Fernando Rivera, University of Central Florida
Paul Calarco, Hudson Valley Community College
Dan Rose, Chattanooga State Community
Karen Coleman, Winona State University
College
Dawn Conley, Gloucester County College
Rachel Stehle, Cuyahoga Community College
Raymonda Dennis, Delgado Community College
Larry Stern, Collin College
Jason Dixon, Walters State Community
Daniel Steward, University of Illinois at
College
Urbana-Champaign
Jonathon Fish, Trident Technical College
Karen Stewart-Cain, Trident Technical College
Matthew Flynn, University of Texas at Austin
Richard Sweeney, Modesto Junior College
Clare Giesen, Delgado Community College
Adrienne Trier-Bieniek, Valencia College
Ron Hammond, Utah Valley University
Thomas Waller, Tallahassee Community
Nicole Hotchkiss, Washington College College
Howard Housen, Broward College Candace Warner, Columbia State Community
Annie Hubbard, Northwest Vista College College
Onoso Imoagene, University of Pennsylvania Tammy Webb, Goodwin College
Kristin Ingellis, Goodwin College Jessica Williams, Texas Woman’s University
Jennifer Jordan, University of Kristi Williams, Ohio State University
Wisconsin-Milwaukee Annice Yarber, Auburn University
Ryan Kelty, Washington College Erica Yeager, Anne Arundel Community
Andrew Lash, Valencia College College
We have many others to thank as well. Nina Hnatov did a marvelous job of copyedit-
ing the new edition. We are also extremely grateful to project editor David Bradley , who
managed the countless details involved in creating the book. Assistant editor Miranda
Schonbrun skillfully tracked all the moving parts that go into publishing this compli-
cated project. Production manager Sean Mintus did impressive work guiding the book
through production, so that it came out on time and in beautiful shape. We also thank
Eileen Connell, our e-media editor, and Mary Williams, our associate e-media editor, for
developing all of the useful supplements that accompany the book. Agnieszka Gasparska
and the entire team of designers at Kiss Me I’m Polish gave the Sixth Edition a stunning
new design and also managed to digest a huge amount of data to create the “Globalization
by the Numbers” infographics throughout Essentials of Sociology.
Preface x xix
We are also grateful to our editors at Norton—Steve Dunn, Melea Seward, Karl
Bakeman, and Sasha Levitt—who have made important substantive and creative contri-
butions to the book’s chapters and have ensured that we have referenced the very latest
research. We also would like to register our thanks to a number of current and former grad-
uate students—many of whom are now tenured professors at prestigious universities—
whose contributions over the years have proved invaluable: Wendy Carter, Audrey
Devin-Eller, Neha Gondal, Neil Gross, Black Hawk Hancock, Paul LePore, Alair MacLean,
Ann Meier, Susan Munkres, Josh Rossol, Sharmila Rudrappa, Christopher Wildeman,
David Yamane, and Katherina Zippel.
Anthony Giddens
Mitchell Duneier
Richard Appelbaum
Deborah Carr
xxx Preface
SIXTH EDITION
Essentials
of Sociology
1
THE BIG QUESTIONS
Theory and
tions sociologists address in their research.
Method
Learn the steps of the research process and
be able to complete the process yourself.
Sociology is the scientific study of human social life, groups, and societies. It is a
dazzling and compelling enterprise, as its subject matter is our own behavior as
social beings. The scope of sociological study is extremely wide, ranging from the
analysis of how people establish social connections with one another to the investi-
gation of global social processes such as the rise of Islamic fundamentalism.
Sociology teaches us that what we regard as natural, inevitable, good, or true may not be
such and that the “givens” of our life—including things we assume to be genetic or biological—are
strongly influenced by historical, cultural, social, and even technological forces. Understanding
the subtle yet complex and profound ways in which our individual lives reflect the contexts of
our social experience is central to the sociological outlook. A brief example will provide a taste
of the nature and objectives of sociology.
Anyone who has attended middle school or high school knows that bullying is a common
occurrence. Through much of history, teachers, principals, and parents turned a blind eye, often
far-reaching solutions. Sociology can help us understand the questions of what, why, and how
public issues and personal troubles arise.
Studying Sociology
The sociological imagination allows us to see that many behaviors or feelings that we view
as private and individualized actually reflect larger social issues. Try applying this sort of
outlook to your own life. Consider, for instance, why you are attending college right now.
You may think that you worked hard in high school, or that you have decided to go to col-
lege so that you have the academic credential required to find a good job; yet other, larger
social forces may also have played a role. Many students who work hard in high school
cannot attend college because their parents cannot afford to send them. Others have their
schooling interrupted by large-scale events like wars or economic depressions. The notion
that we need college to find a good job is also shaped by social context. In past eras, when
most people worked in agricultural or manufacturing rather than professional jobs, college
attendance was rare—rather than an expected rite of passage.
Although we are all influenced by the social contexts in which we find ourselves, none
of us is simply determined in his or her behavior by those contexts. We possess and create
our own individuality. It is the goal of sociology to investigate the connections between what
society makes of us and what we make of ourselves. Our activities structure—give shape
to—the social world around us and at the same time are structured by that social world.
Social structure is an important concept in sociology. It refers to the fact that the social
contexts of our lives do not just consist of random assortments of events or actions; they
are structured, or patterned, in distinct ways. There are regularities in the ways we behave
and in the relationships we have with one another. But social structure is not like a physical
structure, such as a building, which exists independently of human actions. Human societ- structuration
ies are always in the process of structuration. They are reconstructed at every moment by The two-way process
the very “building blocks” that compose them—human beings like you. by which we shape our
social world through our
individual actions and by
Developing a Global Perspective which we are reshaped
As we just saw in our discussion of the sociological dimensions of drinking a cup of by society.
coffee, all our local actions—the ways in which we relate to one another in face-to-face
4. How does the concept common. Individuals began to initiate marriage relationships on the bases of emotional
of social structure help attraction and personal fulfillment. The idea of “falling in love” as a precondition for mar-
sociologists better under- riage was formed in this context.
stand social phenomena? Sociology was founded by thinkers who sought to understand the initial impact of
5. What is globalization? How transformations that accompanied industrialization in the West. Although our world today
might it affect the lives of is radically different from that of former ages, the original goal of sociologists remains: to
college students today? understand our world and what future it is likely to hold for us.
What Theories Do
Sociologists Use?
Learn about the Sociologists do more than collect facts; they also want to know why things happen. For
development of sociology
instance, we know that industrialization has had a major influence on the emergence of
as a field. Be able to
name some of the leading modern societies. But what are the origins and preconditions of industrialization? Why
social theorists and the is industrialization associated with changes in methods of criminal punishment or in
concepts they contributed family and marriage systems? To respond to such questions, we must construct explana-
to sociology. Learn the tory theories.
different theoretical
Theories involve constructing abstract interpretations that can be used to explain a
approaches modern
wide variety of situations. Of course, factual research and theories can never be completely
sociologists bring to
the field. separated. Sociologists aiming to document facts must begin their studies with a theory
that they will evaluate. Theory helps researchers identify and frame a factual question,
yet facts are needed to evaluate the strength of a theory. Conversely, once facts have been
obtained, sociologists must use theory to interpret and make sense of these facts.
Theoretical thinking also must respond to general problems posed by the study of
human social life, including issues that are philosophical in nature. For example, based on
their theoretical and methodological orientations, sociologists hold very different beliefs
about whether sociology should be modeled on the natural sciences.
Early Theorists
Humans have always been curious about why we behave as we do, but for thousands of
years our attempts to understand ourselves relied on ways of thinking passed down from
AUGUSTE COMTE
Many scholars contributed to early sociological thinking, yet particular credit is given to
the French philosopher Auguste Comte (1798–1857), if only because he invented the word
sociology. Comte originally used the term social physics, but some of his intellectual rivals Auguste Comte (1798–1857)
at the time were also making use of that term. Comte wanted to distinguish his own
views from theirs, so he introduced the term sociology to describe the subject he wished
to establish.
Comte believed that this new field could produce a knowledge of society based on
scientific evidence. He regarded sociology as the last science to be developed— following
physics, chemistry, and biology—but as the most significant and complex of all the
sciences. Sociology, he believed, should contribute to the welfare of humanity by using
science to understand, predict, and control human behavior. Late in his career, Comte
drew up ambitious plans for the reconstruction of both French society in particular and
human societies in general, based on scientific knowledge.
HERBERT SPENCER
Herbert Spencer (1820–1903) — a British philosopher, biologist, anthropologist, and
political theorist—was both highly influenced by and highly critical of Comte’s writing.
Spencer held that development is a natural outcome of individual achievement. In The
Study of Sociology (1873), he argued that society can change and improve the quality of
life for all people only when everyone changes their behavior to maximize their indi-
vidual potential. In other words, he believed privileged members of society enjoyed a
high quality of life because they had earned this status. He further argued that the state
should not assist in improving the life chances of individuals, as it interferes with the
natural order: The best persons succeed and the rest fall behind due to their own lack of
effort or ability.
While Spencer’s writings are considered an important influence on functionalist per-
spectives, which we will learn about later in this chapter, his ideas have fallen out of favor
with many contemporary sociologists. His ideas were roundly attacked by Lester Frank
Herbert Spencer (1820–1903)
Ward, the first president of the American Sociological Association (Carneiro and Perrin
2002). However, Spencer’s belief in the “survival of the fittest” had a profound influence on
economics and political science, especially among scholars and policymakers endorsing a
“laissez-faire” approach.
under communal ownership, and a more equal society than we know at present will
be established. materialist
Marx’s work had a far-reaching effect in the twentieth century. Through most of the conception of
century, until the fall of Soviet communism in the early 1990s, more than a third of the history
world population lived in societies whose governments claimed to derive their inspiration The view developed by Marx,
from Marx’s ideas. In addition, many sociologists have been influenced by Marx’s ideas according to which material,
about class inequalities. or economic, factors have
a prime role in determining
MAX WEBER historical change.
Like Marx, Max Weber (pronounced “VAY-ber”; 1864–1920) cannot be labeled simply a
sociologist; his interests and concerns ranged across many areas. Born in Germany, where capitalism
he spent most of his academic career, Weber was educated in a range of fields. Like other
An economic system based
thinkers of his time, Weber sought to understand social change. He was influenced by on the private ownership of
Marx but was also strongly critical of some of Marx’s views. He rejected the materialist wealth, which is invested
conception of history and saw class conflict as less significant than Marx did. In Weber’s and reinvested in order to
view, economic factors are important, but ideas and values have just as much effect on produce profit.
social change.
Neglected Founders
Durkheim, Marx, and Weber are widely acknowledged as foundational figures in sociology,
yet other important thinkers from the same period made valuable contributions to sociolog-
ical thought as well. Very few women or members of racial minorities were given the oppor-
tunity to become professional sociologists during the “classical” period of the late nineteenth
and early twentieth centuries. Their contributions deserve the attention of sociologists today.
HARRIET MARTINEAU
Harriet Martineau (1802–1876) was born and educated in England. She was the author
of more than fifty books and numerous essays. Martineau is now credited with intro-
ducing sociology to England through her translation of Comte’s founding treatise of the
field, Positive Philosophy (Rossi 1973). She also conducted a firsthand systematic study of
American society during her extensive travels throughout the United States in the 1830s,
which is the subject of her book Society in America.
Martineau is significant to sociologists today for several reasons. First, she argued
that when one studies a society, one must focus on all its aspects, including key political,
religious, and social institutions. Second, she insisted that an analysis of a society must
include an understanding of women’s lives. Third, she was the first to turn a sociological
eye on previously ignored issues such as marriage, children, domestic and religious life,
and race relations. Finally, she argued that sociologists should do more than just observe;
they should also act in ways that benefit society. Martineau herself was an active propo-
Harriet Martineau
(1802–1876) nent of women’s rights and the emancipation of slaves.
W. E. B. DU BOIS
W. E. B. Du Bois (1868–1963) was the first African American to earn a doctorate at Harvard
University. Du Bois made many contributions to sociology. Perhaps most important is the
Marx 1. The main dynamic of modern development is the expansion of capitalism. Rather than being cohesive,
society is divided by class differences.
2. Marx believed that we must study the divisions within a society that are derived from the economic
inequalities of capitalism.
Weber 1. The main dynamic of modern development is the rationalization of social and economic life.
2. Weber focused on why Western societies developed so differently from other societies. He also emphasized the
importance of cultural ideas and values on social change.
concept of “double consciousness,” which is a way of talking about identity through the
lens of the particular experiences of African Americans (Morris 2015). He argued that
American society lets African Americans see themselves only through the eyes of others:
“It is a particular sensation, this double consciousness, this sense of always measuring
one’s soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity. One ever
feels his two-ness—an American, a Negro, two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled
strivings, two warring ideals in one dark body, whose dogged strength alone keeps it from
being torn asunder” (1903). Du Bois made a persuasive claim that one’s sense of self and
one’s identity are greatly influenced by historical experiences and social circumstances—
in the case of African Americans, the effect of slavery and, after emancipation, segregation
and prejudice.
Throughout his career, Du Bois focused on race relations in the United States. As he
said in an often-repeated quote, “The problem of the twentieth century is the problem of
the color line.” His influence on sociology today is evidenced by continued interest in the
questions that he raised, particularly his concern that sociology must explain “the contact
of diverse races of men.” Du Bois was also the first social researcher to trace the problems
faced by African Americans to their social and economic underpinnings, a connection that
most sociologists now widely accept. Finally, Du Bois became known for connecting social
analysis to social reform. He was one of the founding members of the National Association
W. E. B. Du Bois
for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and a longtime advocate for the collec-
(1868–1963)
tive struggle of African Americans.
Later in his life, Du Bois became disenchanted by the lack of progress in American
race relations. He moved to the African nation of Ghana in 1961 when he was invited
by the nation’s president to direct the Encyclopedia Africana. He died in Ghana in 1963.
SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM
The work of George Herbert Mead (1863–1931), a philosopher teaching at the University of
Chicago, had an important influence on the development of sociological thought, in partic-
symbolic ular through a perspective called symbolic interactionism. Mead placed great importance
interactionism on the study of language in analyzing the social world. He reasoned that language allows
A theoretical approach in us to become self-conscious beings—aware of our own individuality. The key element in
sociology developed by this process is the symbol, something that stands for something else. For example, the
George Herbert Mead that word tree is a symbol that represents the object tree. Once we have mastered such a con-
emphasizes the role of
cept, Mead argued, we can think of a tree even if none is visible; we have learned to think
symbols and language as
core elements of all human of the object symbolically. Symbolic thought frees us from being limited in our experience
interaction. to what we actually see, hear, or feel.
Unlike animals, according to Mead, human beings live in a richly symbolic universe.
This applies even to our very sense of self. Each of us is a self-conscious being because we
symbol learn to look at ourselves as if from the outside—we see ourselves as others see us. When a
One item used to stand for child begins to use “I” to refer to that object (herself) whom others call “you,” she is exhibi
or represent another—as ting the beginnings of self-consciousness.
in the case of a flag, which
Virtually all interactions between individuals involve an exchange of symbols, accord-
symbolizes a nation.
ing to symbolic interactionists. When we interact with others, we constantly look for clues
to what type of behavior is appropriate in the context and how to interpret what others are
doing and saying. Symbolic interactionism directs our attention to the detail of interper-
sonal interaction and how that detail is used to make sense of what others say and do. For
instance, suppose two people are out on a date for the first time. Each is likely to spend a
good part of the evening sizing the other up and assessing how the relationship is likely to
develop, if at all. Both individuals are careful about their own behavior, making every effort
to present themselves in a favorable light; but, knowing this, both are likely to be looking
for aspects of the other’s behavior that would reveal his or her true beliefs and traits. A com-
plex and subtle process of symbolic interpretation shapes the interaction between the two.
functionalism
A theoretical perspective FUNCTIONALISM
based on the notion that
Symbolic interactionism is open to the criticism that it concentrates too much on things
social events can best be
that are small in scope. Symbolic interactionists have found difficulty in dealing with
explained in terms of the
functions they perform— larger-scale structures and processes—the very thing that a rival tradition of thought,
that is, the contributions functionalism, tends to emphasize. Functionalist thinking in sociology was originally
they make to the continuity pioneered by Comte and by Spencer.
of a society. To study the function of a social activity is to analyze the contribution that the activ-
ity makes to the continuation of the society as a whole. The best way to understand this
CONFLICT THEORIES
conflict theories
A third influential approach is conflict theory. In general, conflict theories underscore
A sociological perspective
the role of coercion and power in producing social order. Social order is believed to be that emphasizes the role
maintained by domination, with power in the hands of those with the greatest political, of political and economic
economic, and social resources; historically, this would include white men with ample power and oppression as
economic and political resources. Two particular approaches typically classified under the contributing to the existing
social order.
broad heading of conflict theories are Marxism and feminist theories.
Marxism Marxists, of course, trace their views back to the writings of Karl Marx. But
numerous interpretations of Marx’s major ideas are possible, and today there are schools Marxism
of Marxist thought that take very different theoretical positions. In all of its versions, A body of thought deriving
Marxism differs from non-Marxist perspectives in that its adherents see it as a combi- its main elements from
nation of sociological analysis and political reform. Marxism is supposed to generate a Karl Marx’s ideas.
and Macrosociology
One important distinction among the different theoretical perspectives we have dis-
cussed in this chapter involves the level of analysis at which each is directed. The study
of everyday behavior in situations of face-to-face interaction is usually called micro
sociology. Macrosociology, by contrast, is the analysis of large-scale social systems, like
the political system or the economy. It also includes the analysis of long-term processes of CONCEPT CHECKS
change, such as industrialization. At first glance, it may seem as though micro and macro
perspectives are distinct from each other. In fact, the two are closely connected (Giddens 1. What role does theory
play in sociological
1984; Knorr-Cetina and Cicourel 1981).
research?
Macro analysis is essential if we are to understand the institutional background of
daily life. The ways in which people live their everyday lives are shaped by the broader 2. According to Émile
Durkheim, what makes
institutional framework. For example, because of societal-level technological develop-
sociology a social
ments, we have many ways of maintaining friendships today. We may choose to call, send science? Why?
an email or text message, or communicate via Facebook or Skype, yet we may also choose
3. According to Karl Marx,
to fly thousands of miles to spend the weekend with a friend.
what are the differences
Micro studies, in turn, are necessary for illuminating broad institutional patterns. between the classes
Face-to-face interaction is clearly the main basis of all forms of social organization, no that make up a capitalist
matter how large scale. Suppose we are interested in understanding how business corpo- society?
rations function. We could analyze the face-to-face interactions of directors in the board- 4. What are the differences
room, staff working in their offices, or workers on the factory floor. We would not build between symbolic
up a picture of the whole corporation in this way, since some of its business is transacted interactionist and
through printed materials, letters, the telephone, and computers. Yet we would certainly functionalist approaches
gain a good understanding of how the organization works. to the analysis of society?
In later chapters, we will explore further examples of how interaction in micro 5. How are macro and
contexts affects larger social processes, and how macro systems in turn influence more micro analyses of
confined settings of social life. society connected?
Developmental Has this happened What have been the patterns of childbearing
Question over time? over time?
Theoretical What underlies Why are more women now waiting until
Question this phenomenon? their thirties and older to bear children?
What factors would we look at to explain
this change?
CONCEPT CHECKS
to real-world concerns. In this chapter, we further explore such issues by asking
whether it is possible to produce objective knowledge. First, we examine the steps 1. Why is sociology
involved in sociological research. We then compare the most widely used research considered a science?
methods as we consider some actual investigations. As we shall see, there are often 2. What are the differences
significant differences between the way research should ideally be carried out and between comparative and
real-world studies. developmental questions?
Ethnography
One widely used qualitative method is ethnography, or firsthand studies of people using
qualitative observations, interviews, or both. Here, the investigator socializes, works, or lives with
methods members of a group, organization, or community. In the case of participant observation, the
Approaches to sociological researcher may participate directly in the activities he or she is studying. An ethnographer
research that often rely on
cannot secretly infiltrate the groups she studies but must explain and justify her presence to
personal and/or collective
its members. She must gain the cooperation of the community and sustain it over a period
interviews, accounts, or
observations of a person of time if any worthwhile results are to be achieved. Other ethnographers, by contrast, may
or situation. observe at a distance and may not participate directly in the activities under observation.
For a long while, research reports based on participant observation usually omitted
any account of the hazards or problems that the researcher had to overcome, but more
quantitative recently the published reminiscences and diaries of field-workers have been more honest
methods
and open. The researcher may be frustrated because the members of the group refuse to
Approaches to sociological
talk frankly about themselves; direct queries may be welcomed in some contexts but met
research that draw on
with a chilly silence in others. Some types of fieldwork may be emotionally isolating or
objective and statistical
data and often focuses even physically dangerous; for instance, a researcher studying a street gang might be seen
on documenting trends, as a police informer or might become unwittingly embroiled in conflicts with rival gangs.
comparing subgroups, or In traditional works of ethnography, accounts were presented without very much infor-
exploring correlations. mation about the observer. It was believed that ethnographers could present “objective”
observations of the things they studied. More recently, ethnographers have been willing to
talk and write about themselves and the nature of their connection to the people under study,
even acknowledging possible sources of bias in their observations. For example, a researcher
ethnography
might discuss how her race, class, gender, or sexual orientation affected the work, or how
The firsthand study of
the status differences between observer and observed distorted the dialogue between them.
people using observation,
in-depth interviewing, or
ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF FIELDWORK both. Also called fieldwork.
Where it is successful, ethnography provides rich information on the behavior of people in
real-world settings. We may develop a better understanding not only of the group but of
social processes that transcend the situation under study.
participant
observation
But fieldwork also has serious limitations. Only fairly small groups or communities
A method of research
can be studied. And much depends on the skill of the researcher in gaining the confi-
widely used in sociology
dence of the individuals involved; without this skill, the research is unlikely to get off the
and anthropology in which
ground at all. The reverse is also possible. A researcher may begin to identify so closely the researcher takes part in
with the group that she loses the perspective of an objective observer. Or she may reach the activities of the group or
conclusions that are more about her own effects on the situation than she or her readers community being studied.
ever realize. Finally, the findings of field studies are seldom generalizable, meaning that
researchers’ conclusions may not hold true for other groups or settings.
survey
Surveys A method of sociological
research in which
Quantitative methodologists have a range of analytical tools and data resources at questionnaires are
their disposal, but surveys are the most commonly used. When conducting a survey, administered to the
researchers ask subjects to provide answers to structured questionnaires. The population being studied.
researcher may administer the survey in person or mail it to a study participant who
Ethnography Usually generates richer and more in-depth Can be used to study only relatively small
information than other methods. groups or communities.
Provides a broader understanding of social Findings might apply only to groups or
processes. communities studied; not easily generalizable.
Surveys Make possible the efficient collection of data Material gathered may be superficial; if
on large numbers of individuals. questionnaire is highly standardized, important
differences among respondents’ viewpoints
Allow for precise comparisons to be made
may be glossed over.
among the answers of respondents.
Responses may be what people profess to
believe rather than what they actually believe.
Experiments Influence of specific variables can be Many aspects of social life cannot be brought
controlled by the investigator. into the laboratory.
Are usually easier for subsequent researchers Responses of those studied may be affected by
to repeat. the experimental situation.
SAMPLING
Often sociologists are interested in the characteristics of large numbers of individuals—
for example, the political attitudes of the American population as a whole. It would be
impossible to study all these people directly, so researchers’ solution is to use sampling—
they concentrate on a sample, or small proportion, of the overall group. Sampling strat-
egies, or the processes through which one selects cases or individuals to study, is an representative
important step in both quantitative and qualitative research. However, for reasons we sample
will see later, it is much more likely that a quantitative sample will be generalizable to A sample from a larger
the overall population. We can usually be confident that results from a population sample population that is
can be generalized to the total population, as long as the sample was properly chosen. statistically typical of
that population.
Studies of only 2,000–3,000 voters, for instance, can give a very accurate indication of
the attitudes and voting intentions of the entire population. But to achieve such accuracy,
we need a representative sample: The group of individuals studied must be typical of the
random sampling
population as a whole.
Sampling method in which
A single best procedure for ensuring that a sample is representative is random sam
a sample is chosen so
pling, in which a sample is chosen so that every member of the population has an equal that every member of
probability of being included. The most sophisticated way of obtaining a random sample the population has the
is to assign each member of the population a number and then use a computer to generate same probability of
a random numbers list from which the sample is derived—for instance, by picking every being included.
tenth number. Random sampling is often done by researchers doing large population-based